Imagine being a king, fighting a war, dying, and being found HUNDRENDS of years later under a parking lot.
@michaeliceman55122 ай бұрын
To be fair, Richard III was an evil bastard.
@Steph-sk3xb2 ай бұрын
We’re probably gonna find Alexander the Great under a McDonald’s
@jodif9162 ай бұрын
Under the letter R!!! They’ve been looking into the princes in the tower by the same lady who found Richard III, in charles II reign they did alterations in the Tower and bones were uncovered under the stairs,the bones found are entombed in Westminster Abbey, they wanted to do a DNA and age test but our Queen Elizabeth II said to leave them entombed, now it’s up to our King Charles to give permission if he does it would be the end of the story.
@starchild15952 ай бұрын
@@Steph-sk3xb omg imagine 😂😂😂
@bastardofdoom2 ай бұрын
Or a Burger King. 😂
@jumaris28Ай бұрын
WOW centuries back kings armored up snd took up on the battles. Those were real kings then ! Today they dress up with medals and titles and won’t even get the shoes wet or muddy ! Always a delightful to listen to you. Thank you 👍💕💕😊 Greetings from Panama 🇵🇦
@aarons6935Ай бұрын
Actually the medals they have are legitimate military medal because alot of them were formely soldiers who served. Or the bare minimum were their fathers
@JB-3794Ай бұрын
It's probably more important for a king to remain alive and not injured in order to lead a nation.
@junrobin933515 күн бұрын
In my country they don't often wear medals but they do serve time and usually are required to reach level of commander at the very least. Including the female members that got a right to the throne. If they can't lead the army they can't make decissions over them. Considering being able to make militairy decissions is part of their job, if they fail to reach the right rank their position can be taken into question.
@Papag532 ай бұрын
We just love opening things - don’t we.
@ijsbrandleendert83502 ай бұрын
Hij lag niet in een kist, en het doel was hem te vinden en te begraven met eer naast zijn familie, en die eer heeft hij gekregen.
@mangot589Ай бұрын
I find it amazing that Henry VIII is buried under a flagstone with some frankly Bizzare array of others.
@glengrieve5443 ай бұрын
A great history lesson they should teach this in all high schools I'm 62 and I certainly learned a thing or two Australia 🎉❤🎉
@alysoncaddick6344Ай бұрын
I always imagine that medieval times were the most terrible times to have been born, for rich and poor alike.
@3bah4y3 ай бұрын
Wow!!!! Thank you!!!! I’ll be watching this while cooking tonight!!!
@unclechris42523 ай бұрын
Enjoy your Richard III body soup.
@jackreacher56672 ай бұрын
Poor King Richard, His wife and son dead and with no heir and almost insane with grief, and with treachery all around him, from the men who supported him ,he sold his life dearly and was brave and courageous to the end.
@DarrenMalinАй бұрын
he murdered children. his own blood.
@pilijones48013 ай бұрын
Extra entertaining and interesting. Loved it. Thank you !
@justinneill50033 ай бұрын
There was a further interesting incident in those final moments before Richard’s last stand; after skewering William Brandon with his lance, he used the broken end to knock John Cheyne off his horse. John Cheyne was Henry’s personal guard, a jousting champion, and was known to be a giant of a man; when they opened his grave centuries later they found a thigh bone, the length of which puts his height at 6’8” (a colossal stature for those times.) More recently a study was done using a man of similar stature to Richard who had an almost identical case of scoliosis; they taught him to ride and how to use a lance, and were able to determine that Richard (trained in combat from childhood, as was the norm for those of his social standing) most certainly would have had the skill, balance and coordination to deliver the necessary impact.
@sharonwaterman8533 ай бұрын
Go job 😂
@jeanwillis26463 ай бұрын
@@sharonwaterman853polite question ….what does ‘go job’ mean
@SteveHornshaw3 ай бұрын
Thank you. An incredible presentation and research piece
@justinneill50033 ай бұрын
@@jeanwillis2646 I’m guessing she meant “good job” but her keyboard is the same make & model as mi 😄
@billbombshiggy92542 ай бұрын
@@justinneill5003 me tea
@KimberlyPatton-x1n2 ай бұрын
One of my very favorite anecdotal snippets about the Bosworth battle is how Lord Stanley stayed on the sidelines and waited to join in the battle on the side that seemed to be winning- then entered to fight for the victor(Henry VII) ..Talk about hedging your bets! A smart strategy considering those times where treason hardly needed a reason!
@Wysteria-Whisper2 ай бұрын
And today the Stanley tools still at work.....how ironic😜
@Maya-bu2rfАй бұрын
There were two Stanley brothers and they took opposite sides so they were always on the right side.
@2FRESH-4U2 ай бұрын
Interesting to think how different the world would be if Richard had been able to get Henry on that battlefield
@TheSamstergangsterАй бұрын
Glad ifoundyour channel
@rj-zz8im2 ай бұрын
Does anybody ever feel that rummaging through someone's grave is in poor taste? Imagine if we did that to graveyards today. These people were laid to rest respectfully by their loved ones for eternity.
@stevenrubisch629Ай бұрын
I've got no sympathy for the posthumous humiliation of fancy pants rich people who thought they were better than everyone else, only to discover they were, in fact, mortal. Richard III murdered two children to grab onto power. Just imagine all the things these people did that we don't know about.
@clare2401Ай бұрын
We do in England and Wales. You only get 99 years on a plot unless a family member claims you a renews the lease.
@Bishop228Ай бұрын
Oh geez. Cry me a river. What a weird little hill to die on. You’re just complaining to complain. Those folks are long gone. I’m sure they couldn’t care less what happened to their bodies in the distant future.
@sulynn722 ай бұрын
It shows how propaganda on the winning side can change history. Henry Tudor only became king because of his mother and uncle. He was insecure about his standing the rest of his life. That's the only reason he married Elizabeth of york. She could have been queen on her own. It would take her granddaughter Elizabeth I to be one of greatest female monarchs
@lisaalene2 ай бұрын
In school we were always taught that Richard III was a coward. I'm glad that you told me otherwise!
@timothymercer35262 ай бұрын
I think anybody who would have killed his Nephews and hid their bodies would in fact be a coward.
@adamsmith83072 ай бұрын
Thank you for the KZbin video. I enjoyed watching the video. ❤❤❤
@Maya-bu2rf2 ай бұрын
The Stanley brothers always played both sides of every battle
@zoeycharlottetaylor1438Ай бұрын
I also realized that, following the series The white princess, the Stanley brothers always switched instantly to the winning side. Sort of like unloyal and not trustworthy.😮
@mikefiell8103Ай бұрын
Perhaps a bit of audio mix would help with the slight bit of echo with your voice over? A respectful suggestion.
@margaretcastell9429Ай бұрын
I believe John of Gaunt's home was where the Savoy Hotel in London now stands.
@Daisy-tl2lh3 ай бұрын
many Kings and Queens were buried at night by candle light with little ceremony and as a result many were lost then forgotten. Women by custom did not attended funerals in Britain until relatively recently. Jane Austin's sister Cassandra had to watch her beloved Jane be taken away for burial by her brothers. At the time of her death Jane was not famous and it is therefore remarkable she was buried in Winchester Cathedral.
@kaitoi1383 ай бұрын
Really?? I thought kings and queens had elaborate funerals. This channel has videos on elaborate funerals, 2 being Jane Seymour and Anne of cleves
@_HimToo2 ай бұрын
Right. I believe that's why the comment was started off with the word '*Many*'.
@spanglerthings55852 ай бұрын
Would depend on the time and situation and the royal persons standing
@Daisy-tl2lh2 ай бұрын
@@spanglerthings5585 Long Live the King or Queen but as soon as they drop dead that's it, its Long live The King or Queen!
@CactusJack602 ай бұрын
I don't think this is 100% accurate.
@martinisherwood28543 ай бұрын
Henry VIII's coffin was opened. King Charles I a coffin, suspected to be stillborn from Queen Anne and Jane Seymour not disturbed; King Richard II's coffin opened, at the moment, it's all I can remember.
@mirandadepriest90952 ай бұрын
Most interesting unboxing video.
@martinisherwood28543 ай бұрын
Henry VIII coffin was opened King Charles I and Richard II, I can remember at this point a still born and Jane Seymour there coffins were not opened
@furrythefox628518 күн бұрын
Poor Catherine of Valois. Her horrific treatment made me tear up and left me speechless. Women cannot escape se*ual assault, in life or in death.
@cjjudd12 ай бұрын
Title was extremely miss leading
@thetruthhurts-j7j3 күн бұрын
So is your sentence.
@carolthomas80043 ай бұрын
Richard III was killed in the Battle of Bosworth -- by Sir Rhys aps Thomas... my many times Great-Grandfather. Sir Rhys served 3 monarchs -- Henry VII, Henry VIII, & Elizabeth I. Sir Rhys was indeed "The Welshman" who killed Richard III. Sir Rhys was made the "Shire Reeve" (Sheriff)& Governor of Wales, & for a brief period held the Title of "Prince of Wales."
@basilvineagarette5662 ай бұрын
Richard III murder is not something anyone should be proud of
@tesseract236523 күн бұрын
@@basilvineagarette566 This is why the world is doomed, these kids are tarded.
@MMattJ722 ай бұрын
I adore your voice.
@quicksilver25102 ай бұрын
I was surprised when I visited King Georges chapel in Windsor, how unassuming King Henry the 8th's grave marker was. Then again, it was probably payback for this aweful person.
@Illusivem8ne2 ай бұрын
The old queen was no fool. Of course she wouldn’t want information to be out that it was really the 2 princes.
@Bishop228Ай бұрын
I still find it fascinating at the number of armchair history experts who did nothing more than read a Wikipedia article, then come to the comments to correct the experts. It’s one of the saddest things I’ve ever seen.
@eh-i184122 күн бұрын
Where do you think the ‘experts’ get their content?
@pioneercynthia13 ай бұрын
I actually took notes to verify facts and drive further inquiry. ❤
@martinisherwood28543 ай бұрын
We do not have a constitution written or otherwise the late Queen in 1991 gave a speech to both houses of Congress in America she went on to say your contract is in your constitution ours is custom and will so we have custom and will.
@amkii2Ай бұрын
Interesting about Catherine of Valois' horrific treatment of her body... reminds me a lot of Catherine Parr. :(
@awiyaann28262 ай бұрын
people forget that lord Stanely later changed sides against henry even tho he was married to henrys mom
@basilvineagarette5662 ай бұрын
Treacherous Stanley betraying Richard then the pretender Henry Twydr (Tudor)
@toyfischer2 ай бұрын
king richard was overwhelmed and having had his helmet either stripped or him losing it they bashed his head in. the rondel dagger likely killed him and then the other wounds were probably the bashing in of his head.
@Rotary_Phone2 ай бұрын
I wonder what became of Richard III's armor after he was killed? The lady here says he was stripped naked, and displayed, but surely someone at the time of his death kept some of his armor as a spoil of war, or something of that nature. I think about these things. Too much time on my hands...LOL
@burrellbikes49693 ай бұрын
I have NEVER heard King Henry Bolingbroke was viewed as one of the worst kings.
@Pretermit_Sound3 ай бұрын
She didn’t say Henry was one of the worst. She said he deposed Richard II, who WAS viewed as one of the worst
@theravagedgrapefruit81902 ай бұрын
Why would Henry 7 bury Richard in an Abbey if Richard had killed his nephews? I don’t believe Richard did. I think Richard was made a villain by Shakespeare to garner support for the Tudors.
@juniemoon1528Ай бұрын
I don’t believe Henry VII had Richard buried. Think it was monks who buried him under the choir, secretly.
@P-G-772 ай бұрын
Think... reflect on how life used to be. If you were poor, certainly some disease even now we consider how a cold could... take you away. If you were rich, certainly you had everything you wanted but when you went into battle there was a "butchery on the field" when it comes to swords, shields, hammers etc... even if they had armor the damage was UNIMAGINABLE... the things you saw on the battlefields were... UNIMAGINABLE... today as absurd as war is "it seems to be cleaner..." absurd thing to say... and yet once breaking, crushing, splitting, cutting etc... were things of the order of the day... I think many have seen scenes... that we now do not even see in our worst nightmares....
@carolynandrade26483 ай бұрын
fascinating
@rogerchadwick34522 ай бұрын
Richard III got a bad rap from history....
@nayjackson90642 ай бұрын
Interesting! Could do with removing the unnatural pauses, which I assume was due to the script pages being turned.
@eh-i184122 күн бұрын
Not ‘off of’,just ‘off’.
@francesmeyer84783 ай бұрын
Richard III introduced the printing press to England.🇺🇸
@cireenasimcox10812 ай бұрын
I think you must have got hold of a piece of - unfortunately - non-verified information. Everyone who studies this time period will cite Caxton as the person who brought the printing press to England. I've never come across anything, anywhere, which drags Richard into it. Caxton was the only person in the UK who knew how to work Johannes Gutenberg's invention. He brought it into the UK. And, really, changed our lives.
@patricioc68832 ай бұрын
The Tudors did not use Catherine of Valois marriage to claim the English throne. But through Henry Vii's mother, Margaret Beaufort, who descended from the line of John of Gaunt.
@moniquedavison53593 ай бұрын
My family on my mother's side are direct descendants of Henry Tudor....the family tree including various coats of arms and the names of my direct relatives, my children and even their Father are there. I have to say its quite overwhelming and a little bizarre when I look at it properly. Getting to the point, I am an actual descendant , and I have been learning from this history lesson and I'm only 10 minutes in. A very fascinating essay, thankyou.
@susanbrand75033 ай бұрын
There's no possible way that you're a direct descendant of Henry Tudor...the only way if it were true ...if you're somewhat related to the modern royal family. .. the only reason why the royal family is in anyway it's because of his Daughter Margaret Tudor...but good luck with that
@familycompactthegrange70142 ай бұрын
@@susanbrand7503 There are many descendants of Henry VII through, as you say, Margaret Tudor and her sister, Many Tudor. I am directly descended through James VI and I, Charles I and Charles II, who had numerous illegitimate progeny. It is great fun to work these connections out, but there are hundreds of thousasnds of us!! I remember reading a book about genealogy in the early days of the internet which stated that the descendants of William the Conqueror numbered in the hundreds, whereas there is a later theory that Edward III is "father of the nation" in that anyone who has four English grandparents is descended from him - who of course was descended from William. It is mind-boggling, but don't dust off the ermine quite yet!!
@mattwalla3652 ай бұрын
You should try to claim the throne then if you have a legitimate claim and heritage
@Sylveon10022 ай бұрын
No one cares. Being related to some from the 1500’s is like being related a stranger in a store.
@P461692 ай бұрын
Someone once said they were a direct descendent of Anne Boleyn 😂, who only had one child Elizabeth 1st , who had no children.
@martinisherwood28543 ай бұрын
No, we don't
@SteffiReitschАй бұрын
Fore centuries fighting, murdering rivals to be KING!
@johnlynch-kv8mz2 ай бұрын
8:18. The way they solved problems back then, mm mm mmm!
@AlwiellandQBelloАй бұрын
More likely he was betrayed and killed by his own bodyguards.
@michaeltowler26323 ай бұрын
It does make you wonder about the DNA of the boys, The late queen must have thought it was them. The whole line in succession is questionable anyway because somewhere far back didn't one of the King's have a wife who gave birth after a 11month pregnancy because he was absent for that amount of time from England on crusade !!
@sharonwaterman8533 ай бұрын
🥰😇🤑🤑🤑🤑🤐
@sharonwaterman8533 ай бұрын
🇦🇺🍌🍋🍓🍉🍐🥥🍎🍇🥜are good 🤤🤤
@lajasnjohu52643 ай бұрын
It was a time when they believed a woman's uterus could walk around the body. Sooo...yeah...no surprise really...
@ingloriousbetch43022 ай бұрын
@@lajasnjohu5264to be fair, they thought our uterus traveled well into the late 1800s if not early 1900s. Leg pain? It moved to the leg. Chest pain? It moved into the chest. Wearing heels? Totally makes your uterus wiggle about in your body.
@Raven-qj8xk2 ай бұрын
@@lajasnjohu5264 hysteria!
@johnlynch-kv8mz2 ай бұрын
2:16. They sure didn’t worry if they painted him pretty, huh?
@mn4169Ай бұрын
so two open coffins and the others?
@Rexag13 күн бұрын
Or, under your house or apartment and now you wonder why you keep shopping for kilts with the eagerness to wear one
@Doc-149Ай бұрын
One wife unburied for 400 years? Hmmm 🧐actually, she sounds familiar. 🤢
@donnadees19712 ай бұрын
Amazing facts…never followed in book about England’s history. Too too complicated.
@Howie-du7ov2 ай бұрын
They could make a "Game of Thrones" like series of the royal family complete with associated drama and inbreeding!
@MysticalBlueRseАй бұрын
On the Princes in the Tower; gendering skeletons is a guessing game. Archeologist look at “common” characteristics of genders (such as larger pelvises being common for women and/or the items buried with said skeleton) but they are realistically guessing the gender and readily admit this. Thus, the only way to gender the two children skeletons, especially as there were no remains of burial items and the bones are of prepubescent age (where changes in the skeleton would sway someone is of one gender over another), would be to have their DNA tested.
@MsTraceymitchell2 ай бұрын
I don't think i have ever heard it pronounced Dun-firm-a-line before
@jannetteberends87303 ай бұрын
This is only about English royalty?
@pioneercynthia13 ай бұрын
Yes. Not unexpected, but still kind of a bummer. One tidbit for you is that many of the tombs of the kings and queens of France were lost during the revolution.
@jjthomas229711 күн бұрын
Ummm....you didn't open a single coffin or even have photographs...WTF?
@chrissmith53102 ай бұрын
King Richard was murdered
@auntheidi93892 ай бұрын
King Richard lll was killed in battle.
@LoriSuddath2 ай бұрын
His mother killed those babies
@tech10k14Ай бұрын
Troyes is pronounced 'Twah'
@christinakling61233 ай бұрын
😂😂 She makes no sense 😅😅😅
@jamesdaves3363Ай бұрын
Could Richard the 3rd have been killed by a spiked war hammer or something similar
@sharleenehurst42502 ай бұрын
i wish the Harris ads on these videos would end. I am not voting for her no matter how many ads KZbin runs.
@CherokeeBird2 ай бұрын
💯💯💯
@modernmoneylab51192 ай бұрын
The ads are targeted at you - they reflect what you search for. We don't all get them.
@shurikuuuАй бұрын
Кто были все эти люди.... уже давно - не важно. Одно только истинно - в прах все превратились... и короли, и графья там всякие, князья и простолюдины.. Одно МЕРИЛО - ДЛЯ ВСЕХ
@brendadion78683 ай бұрын
Topically interesting but phrasing and pronunciation could use improvement
@Howie-du7ov2 ай бұрын
This is KZbin not the freaking BBC.
@mercderkler2 ай бұрын
Why did you watch it then?
@Tampon_TimАй бұрын
Didn't Robert the Bruce turn on Mel Gibson?
@JimStanfield-zo2pz2 ай бұрын
And then they should throw that trash out
@robertagardner54612 ай бұрын
DNA has shown that Richard had blue eyes and blond hair. As for the princes in the tower, Richard did not murder them.
@Howie-du7ov2 ай бұрын
And you know this for certain, how? We're you there?
@Howie-du7ov2 ай бұрын
Oh, I know. Jack the Ripper killed them.
@summondarknessАй бұрын
this title is misleading af
@KISTOVI2 ай бұрын
Title is misleading as I realise..
@AnnCorrigan-y2n3 ай бұрын
Wonderful! But for Heavens sake fix the spelling, it drives nuts!!!!!! 🙏🙏🙏
@dellchica23732 ай бұрын
Did he have scoliosis??
@leighc29822 ай бұрын
Yes.
@Recepalp472 ай бұрын
Tüm dünyanın anasını ağlatan GÜYA İNANÇLI ( CÜNÜP GÜRUH )
@morrisfelton6993 ай бұрын
Please do not use that rather silly non-verb, "to coronate"
@pioneercynthia13 ай бұрын
Given that it's in the OED and has been in use since 1893, I would say you're sadly mistaken.
@Howie-du7ov2 ай бұрын
Some people pick on the most miniscule things. I wish they would find some happiness in their existence.
@rg3412Ай бұрын
Clickbait
@carolinejohnson223 ай бұрын
WHY? Just leave them alone. It's disgusting. When royalty died far away their bodies were dismembered and the flesh boiled off. Carrying a rotting corpse for hundreds of miles, taking months was not viable so they took the bones back to the burial place. ......
@JohnGalt19602 ай бұрын
Kings and queens seem ridiculous to Me.
@charliewelshans3301Ай бұрын
Tudors suck
@daveerickson95242 ай бұрын
verbose likes listening herself
@Howie-du7ov2 ай бұрын
Annoying likes bad mouthing people on the internet ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆
@Willow-fs8dq3 ай бұрын
Why do this? It’s disgusting to disturb their coffins not to mention disrespectful for what? Because science is nosey and could care less that they were breathing, living human beings. Leave them at rest. It’s the right thing to do.
@gabrielagarciamayagoitia15993 ай бұрын
Sorry, they don’t do it physically but gather information, old and new to give us a glimpse at the lives and deaths of historic persons.
@michaeltowler26323 ай бұрын
They are not at rest, they are just a bundle of old bones uncared for and unloved, just like the hundreds of billions of people and animals who have died before and no trace is left and that is going to be our fate too.
@Crocs4cats3 ай бұрын
Couldn’t. It’s couldn’t care less…
@pioneercynthia13 ай бұрын
Many of the graves were hasty and disrespectful in and of themselves. Do you not think that Richard III deserved a better burial than a car park?
@patricial.67582 ай бұрын
@pioneercynthia1 Richard III wasn't buried "in a car park." He was buried in a church structure that was demolished a hundred years later. The land eventually, 300+ years later, was covered by a paved parking lot. Gotta park the cars somewhere.
@richardtalley8213 ай бұрын
No coffins opened.
@malo59513 ай бұрын
I don't understand this morbid fascination w digging up old royal bodies. Is this a Christian thing to do? There is nothing necessary to learn about these poor people. They had their time in the sun, now let them lie in peace. Trying to couch this in terms of learning and history is barbaric and insulting. Simply voyeurism.
@Galaxie500IN2 ай бұрын
we have morbid curiosity. But they’re all the stuff of legends. I know it isn’t probably healthy, but it’s sort of cool the Russians get to see Lenin’s face. I don’t know if he remains a hero to them, though. As an American, I’d go visit Lincoln (well, I have visited his tomb), but it is hard to explain this fascination we have. Even when I go to my father’s grave, I can’t help wondering what he looks like. I pray he looks the same in Heaven.
@allischalmersrescueofbarab94852 ай бұрын
I can't understand the ridiculous fascination with live royal bodies.
@ShannaNL3 ай бұрын
So you are blablablabla about the history of Englands kings. But nothing on topic eh. Clickbait.
@pioneercynthia13 ай бұрын
Did you even watch the video?
@JoC-bg3tf3 ай бұрын
i am watching this but so far it's mostly history I already know and not about opening coffins.
@debrajohnston17902 ай бұрын
Listen again.@@JoC-bg3tf
@JohnGalt19602 ай бұрын
No more kings or queens!
@martinisherwood28543 ай бұрын
You are wrong the sovereign has never been covered by the law which is why King Charles I execution was murder as he was above the law the monarch can NOT commit treason, it would leave the crown open to prosecution which is not possible as they can't be tried in there own court the monarch can do no wrong the Tudors were quick at getting rid of it. Crown immunity is only supposed to be for the Crown Ministers Crown. It is pretty well known the monarch is above the law; the only country majorly changed by the Magna Carta is America as it was used to form their written constitution. We don't have one.
@jeni0408663 ай бұрын
Presumably you mean we don't have a written or codified constitution, it's slightly unclear in your comment? We have an uncodified constitution in the UK and most of the Magna Carta clauses have been eliminated from it over the years.
@martinisherwood28543 ай бұрын
@@jeni040866 We don't have a constitution of any kind in the UK we have custom and will, I've studied the monarchy for 28 years and continue to study as you never stop learning.
@jeni0408663 ай бұрын
@@martinisherwood2854 Yes we do, it's uncodified so it isn't written down in one place like codified constitutions are, customs etc form part of it as do useage, precedent, case law, statutes and and legal instruments. The monarch is a figurehead since it is a constitutional monarchy, the real power for good or bad resides in the legislative body. You should try studying the wider governance of the UK not just the monarchy who are a little cog within it with influence but no actual legislative power.
@martinisherwood28542 ай бұрын
I will say this again for people in the UK does not have a constitution, and I think I, Jen, if you bet would show you that the monarch still legislates under the Royal Prerogative of Henry VIII power's, and it is how some of us legislation is done today. Power is given to the monarch in different ways, not only the royal prerogatives, which the first Ist Queen Elizabeth used as they trace them back to the start of the monarchy; under the new Marriage Act, some people who want to marry overseas have to ask the monarch. So go find the Act and read it, I just show you anyway all the political power belongs to the monarch there is no Parliaments sovereign next you'll believe that on the state Opening of Parliament the door is shut because of the sovereign, unfortunately you would be wrong it is to do with black rod who was always late nothing to do with the Crown. Now if you watched David Starkey you may learn something I tend to agree with David that the Windsor's are happy to sit back and let democracy continue I am hoping that William will be a head of state in the way they should
@martinisherwood28542 ай бұрын
If the legislation is an Order in Council, the power conferred by subsection D of (3) is exercisable by Her Majesty in Council. I
@iluvfrankmorethanyall2 ай бұрын
0:07 Caseoh
@ElohimJim2 ай бұрын
yet if I open grave its a crime...
@MeCaveManStrong2 ай бұрын
I really enjoyed this video a lot please make more just like this one..🤍🤍 God Bless