Maja a gya sir bhot bhot dhanyawad apke her lecture proper samjha me ata ha ji 🌹🌹🌹
@prasadkamble53173 жыл бұрын
your are best teacher
@ProPakistani-r4t4 жыл бұрын
Good lecture
@khushendusharma28784 жыл бұрын
shandar sir g
@biedhakumar95893 жыл бұрын
Sir ji ur teaching style is very excilence
@PremPrakash-cd4wm2 жыл бұрын
thanks, from the bottom of my heart ❤️ you have cleared my all doubts your videos help me a lot to cover my syllabus.
@Vismaad04 жыл бұрын
Great job Mr. Kahlon
@AshishAwasthiMBALLB5 жыл бұрын
बहुत ही शानदार
@akashrai228110 ай бұрын
Such a great teacher ❤
@sarikasalgaonkar4824 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your knowledge Sir, your lectures are so informative and in detail, I also make my notes listening to your lectures, keep it up Sir👍
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Welcome g
@johnybisht70494 жыл бұрын
So so grateful,,thanks😊
@sabakalimshaikh42153 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😊
@manishabhutani82565 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much!! Ur teaching help me a lot in my exams
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
Welcome g
@jorasingh72364 жыл бұрын
Guru ji jab app bolte ho Thik ah ji Muje bhut acha lagta hai
@rinkysingh51623 жыл бұрын
Sir aap bahut accha samjhate ho but plz aap ek lecture Constitution of india par bhi daliye
@jigarpurohit17003 жыл бұрын
Sir you teaching so good 😊🙏🏻🙏🏻
@jigarpurohit17003 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir for giving provided law lecture at you tube ❣️❣️
@ardxxxxx4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful lecture sir...
@mahimasharma26143 жыл бұрын
Sir u r great 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@AdvKr4 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir ...you are amazing ...clear many doubts ....thanks sir
@imaramalik76904 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir for this amazing lecture.... Stay happy😊
@sukhanaftab77185 жыл бұрын
Simple to comprehend. Thanks.
@balkrishna23534 жыл бұрын
Very nicely explained SIRJI. Thank u.👍
@fatimibhat82114 жыл бұрын
Please add cases that makes it convenient
@tajamullislam29844 жыл бұрын
Sir words are very easy to understand and u r teaching in a good path...
@umairshafiquemughal82094 жыл бұрын
Great Job
@karamsingh42794 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir g
@shruti-ch1mr2 жыл бұрын
Sir ji please also make lectures on TPA 🙏🏻🙏🏻
@legalentity4353 жыл бұрын
Sir mai apke lecture se judiciary ki prepration kar rhi hu mai apke saree lecture dekhti hu oor notes v bnaya h
@harpreetsinghkahlon28273 жыл бұрын
Good
@GadiWalaBhaiyaa4 жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@mohamedabdulmajeed97693 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@ranvijaysingh51094 жыл бұрын
Happy blated teachers' day sir,💐💐🙏🙏
@sanjeevverma97894 жыл бұрын
👌👌👌
@tathagatapal19103 жыл бұрын
Sir because of you law become so easy for students like me . Thank you so much for such kinds of video like this ❤️
@harpreetsinghkahlon28273 жыл бұрын
Welcome g
@PoojaGupta-nq3wj3 жыл бұрын
thku so much sir
@babyrani44314 жыл бұрын
Very Nicely explained Sir .Thanku
@vrushalinarwade62182 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir
@adv_hemraj.kangale4 жыл бұрын
Pranam sir ji Thanku sir ji
@nikitasingh6423 жыл бұрын
@harpreetSinghkahlon sir apko iske heading change kr k sec 59-66 kar dene chahiye..really a helpful lecture
@harpreetsinghkahlon28273 жыл бұрын
Ji
@Sehrawat_legal0024 жыл бұрын
धन्यवाद sir
@PoojaGupta-nq3wj4 жыл бұрын
Thku so much sir
@harshittiwari7198 Жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏
@nehagupta78653 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir
@aamaadmilegal45984 жыл бұрын
Sir hats off to you... i am absolutely clear with the provisions taught in this video. Sir eagerly waiting for your upcoming videos on further sections of Evidence Act and kindly complete the whole Act. Thank you Harpreet Sir. 🙏
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Plz check the playlist as I have completed the evidence act, u can check all my vedios in playlist
@My_lyf993 жыл бұрын
Thanku so much sir..
@harshitasharma7684 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir.
@SukhwinderSingh-ul2vh Жыл бұрын
Harpreet sir.... according to sec63(5)...it includes hearsay evidence?
@chandraprakashtripathi11042 жыл бұрын
Sir newspapers are primary or hearsay Eevidence
@ushatheriseofvedicbharat28734 жыл бұрын
Status of Copy of a page of field book related to a land prepared in writing by hand by patwari with his signature. Status of it. Is it original or duplicate. Is it Secondary or primary. Do we need it to be proved and in what manner. Is it a public document.
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
The mutation document and jamabandi entries are relevant fact under Section 35 of Indian Evidence Act because these are prepared by public officials under special legislation i.e. the Land Revenue Act (like HP Land Revenue Act, 1954, as in the instant matter) in discharge of their official duty , this is also a public documents. Smt. Urmila Devi vs. Baldev Raj Himachal Pradesh HC, 01.10.2015
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
It's a primary evidence
@tariqmahmood41284 жыл бұрын
Plz upload video of class on section 17 to 23 Indian evidence act
@ashu76703 жыл бұрын
Sir, when any document lost, the we need to lodge FIR or DDR.? Plz advise..
@harpreetsinghkahlon28273 жыл бұрын
DDR is sufficient
@lawcraze10215 жыл бұрын
Good evening sir g... Sec 66 ki proviso ki sub clause 2 ki b plz koi example bta dyen. Thanku so much sir g....👍
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
A in his plaint specifically mentioned that the original in the possession of B, so there is no requirement to give notice to B, as the plaint is itself a notice.
@lawcraze10215 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Thanks alot sir g👍
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
Plz keep sharing the channel in ur group or with ur friends
@lawcraze10215 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 G sir sure! Anay walay kuch time mein aap k channel pe sab sy zayda subscriber hoon gay puray youtube pe .Aisa lagta hai jaisay aap k samnay beth k class mein lecture lay rahay hain law k . All the best sir g👍
@ushatheriseofvedicbharat28734 жыл бұрын
Sir Status of certified copy like map of colony , audit report and a letter issued by registrar to his subordinates obtained through RTI. Are these certified copy of public documents. Please tell me about its admissibility.. registrar is party in suit and but auditor are subordinate to. him.
@viveksingh-nd1uk4 жыл бұрын
Sir what is status of newspaper report? Is it no evidence or secondary evidence? It has been asked in several exams. Please answer 🙏.
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
newspaper is at best a second-hand secondary evidence.
@viveksingh-nd1uk4 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thank you so much sir for clearing my doubt.🙏 I have been your follower since your limitation law lectures, I just want to tell you that you are the best teacher sir.
@mohitS5324 жыл бұрын
Newspaper is a oral evidence
@ashu76703 жыл бұрын
Sir, in video u told that newspaper is a primary evidence because it made from one resource.. Plz clarify
@TheMehulkhanna2 жыл бұрын
Newspaper is a primary evidence whereas, ie in the cases of libel defamation they are admissible in practice.
@lawgicaliq87885 жыл бұрын
Sir if hearsay evidence is unopposed by defence,is it admissible?
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
No it's not, Bcz hearsay until fall under exceptions depose nothing but just narrated the facts disclosed to him by other person
@lawcraze10215 жыл бұрын
Good afternoon sir g Sir g ...jo sec 59 ki 1st proviso hai jis m expert khud nai a raha hai oral evidence deny ku k wo dead , cannot found,delay,expenses etc... to jo treatise produce kren gay court mein wo documentary evidence hoga?
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
He is just producing the document that is treatise
@Mytwinsbaby1234 жыл бұрын
Sir ji pre ke liye books bataiye pls🙏
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Universal is good and a. K. Jain book on objective questions is really technical and gives u wise knowledge
@Mytwinsbaby1234 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thank u sirji
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Welcome g
@inderpreetsinghbedi6710 Жыл бұрын
Sir you forget to explain sec 65 A and 65B in evidence act
@ushatheriseofvedicbharat28734 жыл бұрын
How all newspapers are primary where master piece of them kept with newspaper agency in there computers. Where Newspaper are prepared by machine through a mechanical process like Xerox machine. Please clarify my doubts
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
It's a soft copy, and newspaper is a hard-copy regarding which law consider it a primary source, and all the copies being printed under a one process be considered as primary evidence