Orthodox Christian MISQUOTES Jesus to Prove His Point!

Рет қаралды 12,194

Күн бұрын

In a dialogue between orthodox Kyle and ‪@NeedGodnet‬, Kyle misquotes John 3:5 to support his argument concerning baptismal regeneration. Unfortunately, this is all too common amongst Catholics and Orthodox. Let's be sure to hold ourselves and others accountable for accurately citing scripture in its context.
HOW TO GO TO HEAVEN: • The Bible Way To Heaven
SUBSCRIBE: / @onodiamante
INSTAGRAM: / onodiamante
PATREON: / onodiamante
DONATE: www.paypal.com...
#salvation #bible #christianity

Пікірлер: 675

@jhenningkelloggia Ай бұрын

as an unbeliever seeking to prove the Bible wrong, John chapter 3 changed my life. I realized, the Bible ain't wrong... I'm wrong

@BornAgainBrother Ай бұрын

Welcome to Christ my friend

@SimplePerson-zq9tj Ай бұрын

Yes my friend, don't listen to people who will put you under bondage by loading works requirement on your back, Salvation Is A Free GIFT for GOD to Give and to be Received by man Freely, not to be "earned"

@digidox7900 Ай бұрын

@@SimplePerson-zq9tjIt's not about a works requirement. The Acts of the Apostles shows us that there are things that must be done as a member of the church. People who did not do as Christ commanded were punished. This is also evident in Paul's epistles and Revelation. Christians are to submit themselves to the authority of the leaders of the church. It's right in the book. The Holy Spirit is administered through the church.

@o.s.adizzy4700 Ай бұрын

@@digidox7900the Holy Spirit is administered through Christ

@digidox7900 Ай бұрын

@@o.s.adizzy4700 Yes but the reception of the holy spirit is mediated through the church. Read acts. It's never given to anyone without the church's mediation. It was initially given to the Church at pentecost. After that, the church administered it because it is Christ on earth.

@SonoftheLivingGod7 Ай бұрын

The truth is a stumbling block to the prideful.

@lchimenz Ай бұрын

When a woman gives birth, her water breaks....born of the flesh.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

Naw

@thundershadow Ай бұрын

And when a person is reborn it is by being buried into Christ's death whereby we are raised to a new life by he who raised Jesus from the dead. It is by faith that we believe if we are planted in the likeness of his death we shall also be raised with him into this new life. We do not see salvation in Baptism because you can't see what is future. We see salvation because the Scripture tells us to see it.

@consolecoach Ай бұрын

@@thundershadow A believer is baptized by one Spirit into the body of Christ according to 1 Corinthians 12:13. That happens the moment someone is saved. That's spiritual baptism.

@CandiceGoddard Ай бұрын

Yes, that's why you need to be baptised to kill that old flesh so you can be reborn and filled with the spirit. Let's not forget the bible says that all are, "born in sin' . Christians should consider the parallel between the flood Genesis 7 and baptism. The holy ghost at the first Pentecost coming in the form of tongues of fire, Acts 2:1-4 and how God will destroy the world and annihilate all who are not going to heaven during the second death. Revelations 20:11-15. I guess people really do skip reading the law section of the bible when the Israelites are told to destroy idols by burning them and then submerge the ashes in water. The human body is an idol in so much as that the purpose of idols is to hold spirits. So the original dolls were not toys but ritual objects made to look like people so that demons could inhabit them and interact with people. Just like how god made a model of himself from clay and breathed life into it. The human flesh was corrupted by sin in Genesis 3. Further tainted by actual shagging of demons as mentioned in Genesis 6 (and afterwards).

@CandiceGoddard Ай бұрын

@@thundershadow So why did Jesus who was perfect and sinless need to be baptised before the Holy Spirit descended on him like a dove in Matthew 3:13-17, Mark 1:9-11, Luke 3:21, 22 and John 1:32? Don't let Satan fool you. People need to be baptised in water. It's clear if you study the bible and understand that demons are real and the flesh is corrupted.

@mkplusultra4171 Ай бұрын

Ryan is amazing. His calming and sober minded spirit is needed in these types of discussions with strangers.

@RobRoy1372 Ай бұрын

Well done.

@limejelo Ай бұрын

That's very generous, God bless you sir! ✝:)

@BornAgainBrother Ай бұрын

Fifty dollars? My guy, make sure you can still get food dropping donos like that

@RobRoy1372 Ай бұрын

@@BornAgainBrother All glory to God. He provides my friend.

@voldmerot Ай бұрын

A Ryan and Ono collab would be awesome to see!

@mranumous Ай бұрын

Careful, he (Ryan) backloads.

@voldmerot Ай бұрын

@@mranumousbackloads? What does that mean?

@toofargonemcoc Ай бұрын

@@mranumous he also affirms some calvinist views such as double predestination

@a-sheepof-christ9027 Ай бұрын

Ryan is a work-inspection backloader i.e.: "do you love your sins?". He believes faith is shown by action. He confuses the real fruit (testimony as evidence of faith) with his version of fruit (works as evidence of faith).

@Flame1500 Ай бұрын

@@a-sheepof-christ9027 Not exactly, he believes that works and fruits of the spirit are necessary for *men* to know if you are saved and retain good moral standing. Since humans cannot see into our heart they must rely on outward signs. But before God it’s only a matter of faith. If you listen to Ryan you can tell he’s a free gracer he even said if you trust in Christ and sin 1 minute after and then die you’re still saved.

@therealmorganofficial Ай бұрын

Your ministry has utterly confirmed the purest and simplest gospel! Thank you!

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

A simplified gospel doesn’t mean a correct gospel

@Jayyyynmg Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 “But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.” ‭‭2 Corinthians‬ ‭11‬:‭3‬ ‭KJV

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@Jayyyynmg nice try. “For if he that cometh *_preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.”_* ‭‭2 Corinthians‬ ‭11‬:‭4‬ ‭KJV‬‬ That another Jesus, 👆🏾 is the Protestant, nondenominational, Baptist, Pentecostal etc.. Jesus.

@Jayyyynmg Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 yeah sure

@lightbeforethetunnel Ай бұрын

@@Jayyyynmg question: is repentance included as a requirement for salvation? Is that what is being taught here? Just curious.

@MrErpman Ай бұрын

I have difficulty understanding why some want to add requirements to salvation. The veil of the temple was torn to give us free access with our faith.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

Why are you adding faith to the finished work. You don’t need to add your faith.

@MrErpman Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 Your faith/belief is the requirement. Nothing is being added. ????

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@MrErpman so you’re adding to the finished work of Christ because your faith was not needed for Him to accomplish this finished work.

@MrErpman Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 To receive the gift of his sacrifice you must have faith in him. Not everyone will be saved. That isn't an additional requirement. John 3:16 lays it out concisely.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@MrErpman so is repentance a requirement?

@Solosomnia Ай бұрын

I notice a wave of people putting their faith in “Worldly Church Fathers.” And religious authorities but seem to be cutting Jesus out entirely. Lord have mercy 🙏🕊️.

@q-petebassin2557 Ай бұрын

They aren’t cutting out Jesus. This is a classic Protestant objection that has 0 merit if you actually study the Bible and church history

@Solosomnia Ай бұрын

The difference between slaves and friends is a matter of obedience. A slave of my friend is a friend of mine. Yea if we both be slaves then let’s toil together for the yoke is easy. What is this argument? Where does church history and the bible remove the merit of the argument?

@q-petebassin2557 Ай бұрын

@@Solosomnia because holding to apostolic traditions isn’t cutting out Jesus. You’re being intellectually dishonest. The Protestants churches have derailed Christianity to an unrecognizable degree. If sola scriptura were true then there shouldn’t be 40,000 denominations. Traditions are very important as are the sacraments

@gregorylatta8159 Ай бұрын

@@q-petebassin2557Scripture to support your assertion???

@gregorylatta8159 Ай бұрын

@@q-petebassin2557You mean your chosen tradition!

@consolecoach Ай бұрын

1 John 5:6 (same author of John 3:5) This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.

@tongakhan230 Ай бұрын

1 John 2:27 And as for you, the ANOINTING that you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to be teaching you; Those who get anointed with holy spirit know it. These are the born again followers of Jesus. Only a few get chosen. Matthew 22:14 “For there are many invited, but few chosen.”

@Dlee-eo5vv Ай бұрын

No. The contrast is not water vs Spirit. It is the whole verse 5 against flesh birth as summarized in verse 6. Water is not flesh birth. Christ is speaking to a man already born. He does not need to be reborn of his mother. Therefore the water must be conjoined to the action of the Spirit.

@Asura10x10 Ай бұрын

So is born from the water must accept Christ that alone is how we are saved not through a silly baptism?

@Dlee-eo5vv Ай бұрын

No. Repentance, ( silly) baptism.is the birth. More is required to sustain.

@debbiewareing1178 Ай бұрын

@@Dlee-eo5vv So the thief on the cross was not born again? Yet Jesus told him he would be in paradise with him!

@Dlee-eo5vv Ай бұрын

@debbiewareing1178 Christ can make exceptions, also the theft was prior to the resurrection and penticost. We can only make determinations upon the normative way of redemption.

@Psalms144 Ай бұрын

@@Dlee-eo5vv I can appreciate the respect you hold for baptism, as it is indeed important. However, it is not required for salvation. In your argument where you say God can make an exception to His own rule, this means He would contradict Himself. Now certainly if He wanted to, He can; He’s God! But Truth will never contradict itself. Does 2+2=4 have some exceptions where it doesn’t ever equal 4? No. Same with salvation. God will never make an exception to believe in Christ and ye shall be saved, as perfectly sound truth does not need exception. Are you better than the thief on the cross? Am I? Certainly not.

@dited358 Ай бұрын

Kyle has always been quite combative against people he assumes he knows more than, hate to say this seems to be a trend in the orthodox sect.

@Issacandjacob Ай бұрын

And the Catholic sect. But really, anybody that holds this Sanhedrin type attitude, will face Matthew 7:21-23.

@Evil_Ghandi13 Ай бұрын

those in the orthodoxic and Catholica faith are gate keepers of the faith

@magdiel007 Ай бұрын

@@Evil_Ghandi13 Are they?

@JIGAK1 Ай бұрын

Where does the word sect come from?

@Unseen_warfare. Ай бұрын

Orthodoxy isn’t a “sect”. We are the One True Church of Christ. We know these things because that’s what the Church Fathers taught.

@DavidHuber63 Ай бұрын

We are to catch our brother before he falls 🙏🏼

@markdoherty754 19 күн бұрын

Good stuff. Orthodox and Roman Catholics all seem to share a similar misunderstanding of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.

@sdf32asd 8 күн бұрын

yes, for 1500 years people held down to heretical understanding of salvation, thank God for prophet Martin Luther who clarified this 🙏🙏

@BigNarutoFan327 Ай бұрын

What in particular must we believe to be saved, and what verses show it? Reading through the Bible and on chronicles right now.

@NickWisda 29 күн бұрын

realize you've broken God's laws, and therefore deserve hell. then trust that jesus took all the punishment that you deserve on the cross, and rose from the dead.

@squixiee 29 күн бұрын

Believe that God the Father sent His only begotten Son, the Lord Jesus Christ to earth, fully God and fully man, born of the virgin Mary, was crucified for our sins, buried, and was raised from the dead 3 days later and ascended to Heaven. Jesus Christ is one of the three Persons of the Trinity. I would start reading the Bible with Matthew and John, then the rest of the New Testament then the Old after

@squixiee 28 күн бұрын

@@BigNarutoFan327 You also need to repent of your sins and accept the Lord Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior

@Gorpmeat 14 күн бұрын

Read acts chapter 16 and 1 Corinthians. The jailer asks this exact question in verse 30 and it is answered in verse 31. Don’t be misled, “repent” as used in scripture means a change of mind. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved and your household.

@LilacDaisy2 7 күн бұрын

I always go back to the book of Romans to remind myself what the Gospel is - it's laid out so plainly.

@oshea2300 Ай бұрын

We come into this Earth through water. Our mom's water breaks and then we come out.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

Different context

@oshea2300 Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 The flash birth is a water birth. The water in John 3 means flesh.. the spirit means born again. John 3 is not talking about baptism.. not water baptism anyway.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@oshea2300 no it doesn’t

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@oshea2300 email me for a debate

@focusonJesus7551 Ай бұрын

Amen ! Thank you Jesus!

@AzBboy Ай бұрын

Amen! You did it again brother!

@dabrab6324 Ай бұрын

Ryan says its by grace you are saved through faith. But then uses the common Calvanist response of "if your doing such and such then you never were saved in the first place." Which backloads your performance to salvation. Its sad because he does have a talent in fishing for men. But he doesnt always mention the Calvinist saying. So i do think he leads some to Christ.

@toofargonemcoc Ай бұрын

his mods promote calvinism: regeneration precedes faith, God chooses who is saved and who is lost. calvinism is heresy

@Cheemz1 Ай бұрын

Hmmm by”such and such” do you mean sinning? Because I seen him say “you were never saved in the first place” when you walk away from Christ.

@dabrab6324 Ай бұрын

@@Cheemz1 such and such meaning a sin whether that be murder being gay or other stuff. Basically whichever sins he thinks is not forgivable once born again.

@KOZYKEVLAR Ай бұрын

@@dabrab6324which doesnt make sense because as long as we’re human we can sin, its now the Holy Spirit leading us into winning our struggle with sin

@Cheemz1 Ай бұрын

@@dabrab6324that’s weird though? Because he says that if you sin you are still forgiven of that sin? And he even uses the example of “what if you’re sinning when Jesus comes back? You are still forgiven”

@Robertdowneyukofficial Ай бұрын

"Whosoever is baptised in the name of.... oh wait that's not what it says" 😂😂😂😂😂 Ono I love you brother thank you for making me smile 😂😂 I'm a Believer in Christ by His Grace through faith alone

@shawnjaillet568 Ай бұрын

Ignorance and pride are a dangerous combination. They really need to study all of Jesus’ rebukes of the Pharisees while looking in a mirror.

@iamachildofgodbecauseibeli2491 Ай бұрын

Amen 🙏 brother in our Lord Jesus Christ ✝️ God bless Water 💦 baptism is NOT part to be saved, stay saved, or to prove our salvation.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@iamachildofgodbecauseibeli2491 you follow another gospel.

@iamachildofgodbecauseibeli2491 Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 What makes you think 🤔 I follow another gospel?

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@iamachildofgodbecauseibeli2491 what you just said.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@iamachildofgodbecauseibeli2491 would you like to debate me on baptism?

@iamachildofgodbecauseibeli2491 Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 1 Corinthians 1:17 KJV 17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross should be made of none effect. 1 Corinthians 1:17 in the King James Holy Bible (Word Of God) proves water 💦 baptism is NOT part to be saved, stay saved, or to prove our salvation.

@jamesp877 Ай бұрын

Bro, I actually thought this was NeedGod's video, I had to pause for a second when you popped up on the screen. I need to start reading the channel names before I click. Great video, though!

@jhenningkelloggia Ай бұрын

I did the same.. thinking this was going to be an uncomfortable 8 minute conversation I stopped the video after about a minute... then noticed... Onorato's name

@illumitommy Ай бұрын

I run into these situations as well because of the way the platform will suggest or auto-play into things. This is also how peoples kids left unattended with kids videos got auto played into some EFFED up videos of people in spiderman costumes.

@EarlyChurchThought-rf6xy Ай бұрын

Why do protestant westerners living in the 21st century think they have the right interpretation of scripture and not orthodox middle easterners that lived in the 3rd, 4th, 5th centuries who actually spoke Greek and Aramaic, the two original languages of the new testament?

@JG-id5vi Ай бұрын

1 john 2 27 But the anointing that you received from him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about everything, and is true, and is no lie-just as it has taught you, abide in him. If we have The Holy Spirit, He will lead us to the truth. Some people get it wrong when they rely on their own understanding. 3rd century is no different than the 21st century in requiring the Holy Spirit to understand scripture. Men back then got a lot of things wrong and a lot of things right just as now. Sadly many Christians live there lives as the Samarians in acts 8 14 17.Not because of ignorance but because they refuse to believe. Many catholics and orthodox and even many protestants live this way. Intellectual pride can be deadly. May God have mercy on us. And give us eyes to see and ears to hear.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@JG-id5vi that verse isn’t talking about understanding scripture. It’s talking about righteous living.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@JG-id5vi the church has the correct interpretation, not some individual in the 21st century who did not receive the deposit of the faith.

@gottesurteil3201 Ай бұрын

You would have a point but he's debating a child with facial hair who probably doesn't speak any of those languages.

@EarlyChurchThought-rf6xy Ай бұрын

@@JG-id5vi”Heretical teachers pervert Scripture and try to get into Heaven with a false key, for they have formed their human assemblies later than the Catholic Church. From this previously-existing and most true Church, it is very clear that these later heresies, and others which have come into being since then, are counterfeit and novel inventions.” - Pope St. Clement I of Rome

@Dlee-eo5vv Ай бұрын

Protestant misunderstanding of scripture. Oh, the blindness!

@shivadizayin Ай бұрын

After reading Acts today in a discipleship I read how at times some people received the Holy Spirit at baptism, while others received it by the laying of hands. At the day of Pentecost, the Holy Spirit filled the 12 disciples. Then Peter tells how the gentiles received the Holy Spirit while he was taking to both the Jews and gentiles. The “Jews were astonished” because the even gentiles received the Holy Spirit before they were baptized . Acts 10:44-48 The Holy Spirit comes to everyone in different ways. There is no set rule. Acts 19:1-6 19 While Apollos was at Corinth, Paul took the road through the interior and arrived at Ephesus. There he found some disciples 2 and asked them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” They answered, “No, we have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.” 3 So Paul asked, “Then what baptism did you receive?” “John’s baptism,” they replied. 4 Paul said, “John’s baptism was a baptism of repentance. He told the people to believe in the one coming after him, that is, in Jesus.” 5 On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they spoke in tongues and prophesied Acts 2:1-4 2 When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place. 2 Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. 3 They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. 4 All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them Acts 10:44-48 44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. 45 And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God. Then Peter answered, 47 “Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” 48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then they asked him to stay a few days.

@harveygosal Ай бұрын

In John Chapter 6 the Lord Jesus isn't talking figuratively, but literally. That's why when many turned away because of the teaching, the Lord didn't correct them. Early Christians believed this, and they were led by the Holy Spirit... not into error but truth.

@juliamilford1979 19 күн бұрын

can you explain what is the purpose of water baptism

@user-tq8dy3mm9o Ай бұрын

It’s sad to see how Orthodox believers are told through traditions but they don’t understand scripture and salvation as a free gift.

@davisdietzenalt Ай бұрын

The scripture itself is tradition though?

@user-tq8dy3mm9o Ай бұрын

@@davisdietzenaltI trust scripture as truth but see traditions as secondary and necessary for salvation. God’s truth is scripture should come first before traditions.

@davisdietzenalt Ай бұрын

@@user-tq8dy3mm9o The scripture is a tradition though

@bigjojo2832 Ай бұрын

⁠@@user-tq8dy3mm9o scripture came from the tradition of the church. It’s the churches book.

@amara7734 Ай бұрын

@@user-tq8dy3mm9oYoure dodging the fact that scripture itself is a tradition. It is because if church tradition that the scripture exists. So was tradition correct then but then magically stopped working and everyone forgot what christianity was?

@user-lj3ku5yd1h Ай бұрын

“Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,” ‭‭1 Peter‬ ‭3‬:‭21‬ ‭

@BUDPUD Ай бұрын

Provide context

@user-lj3ku5yd1h Ай бұрын

@@BUDPUD “now saves you” it’s so clear. You would have to do a bunch of gymnastics to deny that

@dextere4616 27 күн бұрын

This is also clearly explained in 1 Peter 3:21 that it is not a physical water but a spiritual one.

@jesuschristsaves9067 20 күн бұрын

It’s both.

@SamWayne85 Ай бұрын

Baptism referenced is not always about water, water referenced is not always baptism. This has created so many false doctrines, God bless your ministry brother.

@ORaddlyispissedoff Ай бұрын

John chapter 6 does not say it’s allegorical. He even says his flesh is real food and his blood is real drink. When they raise objections and the disciples say that these are hard words he simply asks them if they will leave him also, he does not explain it’s just symbolic.

@thnrrtr Ай бұрын

Jesus is Lord 👑🙏

@BansheeKing22 Ай бұрын

Amen

@jokerjoker173 Ай бұрын

Do you remember John the Baptist? Why did the disciples are baptising the people with water? How do you understand Matthew 28:19-20?

@richardmunro7207 Ай бұрын

These guys number 1 problem, as is with most of the world, is they fail to rightly divide the word of truth as Paul warned Timothy in 2 Timothy 2:15. The reason there is so much confusion today is because people want to follow Jesus teachings through His earthly ministry instead of following Him correctly (Spiritually and not in the flesh), through the doctrine that HE GAVE TO PAUL. This is why baptism, tithes and giving, sin, eternal life, can or can't lose your salvation are all major issues,because you don't rightly divide the word of truth. Jesus died for your sins, was buried and rose again the third day, that's the Gospel, only found in Paul's letters (1 Corinthians 15 VS 1-4), no, Peter, John, Mark and Matthew never preached or wrote this. Focus on why Jesus came to Paul on the road to Damascus, not what Jewish disciples taught Jews under the law. We no longer know Christ according to the flesh. We don't have to be baptised in water, ever, to be saved, you give as you feel in your heart, we are NOT under a tithing law and neither are we under any other laws from the Torah. Period.

@fenderlespaul5781 Ай бұрын

Acts 2:38: Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

@BansheeKing22 Ай бұрын

Jesus is King and Lord. I dont care what the unbelievers say or try, nothing will change my faith in God.

@gregshirk7220 Ай бұрын

Thanks!

@Gospel-check Ай бұрын

Ono I know you don’t usually respond but you need to do some live debates we need you out there nobody is as good as you at this I would love to see you snap on these guys

@Ezekio3160 Ай бұрын

Debates are a waste of time to be honest. Debates are who can “better put together a set of arguments and win the audience” My opinion this type of video responses are better than debates. God bless

@Gospel-check Ай бұрын

@@Ezekio3160 I agree but the problem is there’s so many guys that think they’re too hot 🥵 and really nobody from the eternal security side is shutting them down so people get this idea that anybody that believes OSAS is scared of a debate I don’t want ono to make a career out of it like these other guys are but do a couple on some of these top tier debate guys and shut them down and ono got the perfect character for it he stays cool calm and collected

@talon5902 Ай бұрын

many individuals argue over crumbs on the floor ? how is it possible to be a new creation, when on the table is all a individual can eat ? Jesus Christ is the way the truth and the life many need him more than they could ever know amen

@TommyNitro Ай бұрын

It's not the same thing as a muslim stating the word Trinity isn't in Scripture. The concept is there and the word names what is demonstrated. Baptism, however, IS in Scripture, but not in John 3. That was an incorrect comparison.

@Unseen_warfare. Ай бұрын

Yes. Born again is being renewed by baptism into the Church.

@Robertdowneyukofficial Ай бұрын

No it's not. It's BY FAITH ALONE that you become born again. Not by water.

@Unseen_warfare. Ай бұрын

@@Robertdowneyukofficial Faith itself is a work. That’s in the scriptures. Go read James. Go read the Church Fathers. Go read the Didache. Why are you following Martin Luther? Born again is baptism. It’s not debatable. Either you believe correctly or you are wrong on this. That’s it. Baptism is both spiritual and physical.!

@Robertdowneyukofficial Ай бұрын

@@Unseen_warfare. I'm not following Martin Luther. I follow Jesus through Paul and Paul says that it's by faith alone in Christ alone simply by believing His death, burial and Resurrection alone. Its faith plus nothing that equals salvation

@Unseen_warfare. Ай бұрын

@@Robertdowneyukofficial (Yea. Taking that verse completely out of context from all the other verses in the Bible and ignoring that St. James literally says “Faith without works is dead” and “Even the demons believe and Tremble” What you are professing is a reformed teaching from Martin Luther and it’s a misinterpretation of the Biblical witness. “Once saved, always saved” is a heretical doctrine that keeps people from working out their salvation with fear and trembling. Salvation is a process. Not a one and done event in time.)

@Robertdowneyukofficial Ай бұрын

@@Unseen_warfare. I DON'T follow Martin Luther. I follow Jesus VIA PAUL. And yes Faith without works is dead but our only work is to BELIEVE on the Lord Jesus, not be baptised by water, not by communion, not by tithing, not by church attendance, not by being slain in the spirit etc. It's only by FAITH ALONE. TO HIM THAT WORKETH NOT BUT BELIEVETH ON HIM THAT JUSTIFIETH THE UNGODLY, HIS FAITH IS COUNTED AS RIGHTEOUSNESS.

@SpinandThrowDiscGolf Ай бұрын

This is the falling away. Works salvation and Zionism the two legs of the apostasy.

@jesuschristsaves9067 20 күн бұрын

Works salvation? Salvation has works in it.

@gregorylatta8159 Ай бұрын

Only free grace theology can actually claim apostolic tradition.

@jesuschristsaves9067 20 күн бұрын

💀💀🤡🤡🤡clown take.

@Trustalone 10 күн бұрын

Needgod is a perseverance of the saints Christian that claims osas and faithalone. Id be careful showing needgod as he sneaks in works for salvation.

@LilacDaisy2 7 күн бұрын

All I've heard him say is that over time and even many years, even though they may fall into deep sin for a time, a Christian will be able to look back on their life and see the sanctifying work of the Spirit (Godliness), even if it's to a small degree. Is that not true.

@Trustalone 5 күн бұрын

@lilacDaisy111 needgod believes of your not faithful till the end you ho to hell. If your faith isn't on jesus continuously your hellbound. This is false. Imagine getting dementia forgetting jesus and going to hell. Or even doubting your faith... hell. God cannot lie and he said to the unsaved "i never knew you depart from me" notice the never. Not once did i know you, but never. Ill pray for him. In his logic apostasy isnt a sin and jesus only died for some sins...

@LilacDaisy2 5 күн бұрын

@@Trustalone I actually just saw him yesterday say to someone "so long as you keep believing," and I thought, "Is that faith alone or _faithfulness_ alone." So, he does believe that it is not by belief we are saved but by our performance. But I am so grateful to the Lord for showing me his channel, because it was the soft pill I needed to start doubting Lordship salvation and the "repent from your sins to be saved" thing. I'm sure Ryan would say that dementia doesn't count, as would my Presbyterian church (which I'm not going back to). Those with full-blown dimentia in the church were always a "believing" brother or sister still. What Ryan's OSAS means (as my church) is that the "never knew you" is correct, because defectors of the faith prove they were never saved. They cite the "They went out from us, because they were never a part of us" verse. For me, this meant that I always had to be good enough to prove I was really saved, but I never knew what "good enough" entailed, so I was always on a rollercoaster of doubt and depression, then a high after good works ... until I questioned them. I was Peter, sinking by taking my eyes off Jesus. Theirs is double speak! "You're saved by grace alone and none of your good works can ever contribute to your salvation. But if you're not good enough, you show that you never were saved, so live up to it!" A few weeks ago, my pastor said, "If you don't pray, you're not saved." That was the last straw, (I'm sure he meant if you don't pray much, but what is enough). So now I have no "body" to be a part of now, so I'm loving that I can talk about it here. I want to shout it!!! But I have a lot of praying for wisdom and studying for myself to do, to be at ease with my conviction that it seems like "easy grace" is true grace - THE narrow gate! See! I just wondered "what is the hard work that accompanies the narrow gate, then." Up until a couple months ago, Paul Washer was my favourite sermon-giver. This is a very surprising turn of events, LOL!

@Trustalone 4 күн бұрын

@lilacDaisy111 i was where you were a year ago. And loved paul washer aswell. Im glad your seeking! You will find the right path just keep seeking and don't trust everyone that claims there gospel is true. The bible is your guide. The ironic part of the narrow path is its simple. So simple noone believes it. Ps beware of needgod. He holds to some calvinest. As for you on this topic. One can say they are saved and not be so. The same is true in reverse. One can claim they aren't saved yet so they are. Once saved always saved. If you could lose it you wouldn't have it 💯 God bless and i hope you the best!

@lawruns2793 Ай бұрын

But baptism is a process or the basics of following Christ...for he himself was baptized Even though he was sinless...then what do you say to the other verses where apostles baptized people?

@gregshirk7220 Ай бұрын

If you wrote a book about how you learned the faith, I’d buy it!!

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@gregshirk7220 you’d be wasting your money.

@colonalklink14 Ай бұрын

Too bad that the guy supposedly defending the gospel is actually a works backloader.

@colonalklink14 Ай бұрын

@@thelaststand2670 They that have done good are those who have the imputed righteousness of God in Christ Jesus. There are two judgements. First is the Judgement Seat of Christ where the already saved people are judged by their works for rewards in Heaven or a lack thereof. Secondly is the Great White Throne Judgement where you and all others like you will be judged by your works. There your level of eternal punishment will be decided.

@tongakhan230 Ай бұрын

James 2:26 Indeed, just as the body without spirit is dead, so also FAITH WITHOUT WORKS IS DEAD. True Christians have to be identified for this prophecy to be fulfilled. See Matthew 24:9.

@colonalklink14 Ай бұрын

@@tongakhan230 James is really about having a practical faith that helps others, nothing to do with salvation at all. I get to choose whether I have a dead faith or an alive faith.

@tongakhan230 Ай бұрын

@@colonalklink14 : James 2:14 Of what benefit is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but he does not have works? THAT FAITH CANNOT SAVE HIM, can it? 18 Nevertheless, someone will say: “You have faith, and I have works. Show me your faith without the works, and I WILL SHOW YOU MY FAITH BY MY WORKS.” (Matthew 7:21) “Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the Kingdom of the heavens, but ONLY THE ONE DOING the will of my Father who is in the heavens will. Jesus disciples will be preaching throughout the world fulfilling. (Matthew 24:14) And this good news of the Kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come. In spite of: (Matthew 24:9) “Then people will hand you over to tribulation and will kill you, and you will be hated by all the nations on account of my name. Only those who withstand this persecution will be saved. (Matthew 24:13) But the one who has endured to the end will be saved. People sitting at home with their feet up claiming that they have faith, cannot be identified by all the nations to be hated. Only ONE UNITED GROUP of Jesus' Disciples are doing God's Will in these last days. Any guess?

@familyplan979 Ай бұрын

The 👀 are a window, run.

@francisaranzasu2493 14 күн бұрын

The two different kind of born again group The Lord Jesus said that all people must be born again to see the kingdom of God and enter it, but how can a person be born again or born from above? There are two kind of Born again groups. The false or counterfeit born again and true born again. The counterfeit born again is the religion teaches that in order to be born again one must be baptized and change one's life. The second born again group is a religion teaches that to be Born again, you must believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. Being born again through baptism is a teaching contrary to the statement of the Lord Jesus because instead of reading the entirety of the conversation between the Lord Jesus and Nicodemus, they stopped at verse 5 and immediately gave it the meaning that born again in water, is to be by being baptized in water or gets baptized John 3:5 and they jumped to John 3:22-26 then they moved to reading Ephesians 5:26 but this teaching is contrary to the truth because if you read the entirety of their conversation, there was no mention of the Lord Jesus to undergo baptism in order to be born again, although after their conversation, the Lord Jesus and His disciples went to the area of Judea and baptized people there. The true born again or born from above is through faith in the Lord Jesus. That is the exact answer of the Lord Jesus to the question of Nicodemus. John 3:9-18 Notice what the Lord Jesus said, unless a person is born again he will not see the kingdom of God and enter it. Thus he will be judged and perish in hell but when a person believes in the Lord Jesus he will not perished but have eternal life. John 3:16-18 Therefore if you believe in the Lord Jesus you will be saved, after you receive salvation from God by His grace through faith in Christ you must be baptized in water, stay away from evil and immorality, live a sober, righteous and holy life, and devote your life to doing good, not to be saved but because you are saved already. Ephesians 2:8-10; Titus 3:5-8; Acts 16:30-33; Titus 2:11-12

@Jd-808 Ай бұрын

If 3:5 meant “flesh”, it would say “flesh”. It doesn’t, it says water, because it’s baptism being talked about. It’s completely redundant to say that unless a person exists (is “born of the flesh”) they cannot enter the Kingdom of God lol This is where sola scriptura gets you…

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

@@Jd-808 If 3:5 meant “baptism”, it would say “baptism”. It doesn’t it says water, because in the preceding verse Nicodemus referred to his mother’s womb. In verse 5 and 6, Christ contrasted being born of water with being born of the flesh, this is why man needs to be born AGAIN. This is where context gets you.

@Jd-808 Ай бұрын

@@OnoDiamanteThere’s no need for it to literally say baptism because it makes perfect sense as expressed. But you can substitute baptism and it will make sense. If you actually read yours as you think it should mean, it’s goofy. It doesn’t make any sense that Jesus would think it’s necessary to qualify that a person must be born to do anything at all. It goes without saying. And people are “born of women” (sound familiar?), not water. Nowhere else is “born of water” used to refer to a natural birth. Because that’s not what Jesus is talking about. Nicodemus misunderstood the double meaning - “born from above” and thinks Jesus is literally talking about being born again, from a woman. The point is that Jesus is NOT talking about that, not that he is. You guys literally just make this up off the cuff because your beliefs demand it.

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

@@Jd-808 You’re demonstrating a fundamental ignorance of the word of God. “This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.” 1 John 5:6 What does that mean that Christ “came by water”? Keep in mind what John stated in the preceding chapter: “Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is COME IN THE FLESH is of God:” 1 John 4:2

@Jd-808 Ай бұрын

@@OnoDiamante You got me there, I agreed that can be read as referring to natural birth. But in that instance it only makes sense as referring to natural birth in the context of Christ’s divinity. The point remains that it doesn’t make any sense for Christ Himself to be talking about the necessity of people to be born to be saved because all people are born, it is only the God-Man Christ for whom it is even conceivable that He might not have been, so the only sensible reading is baptism.

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

@@Jd-808 Friend, for the last time, you’re acting as if Nicodemus didn’t initially interpret Christ in the PHYSICAL SENSE. He’s the one who brought up the first birth and Jesus responded by contrasting that with the new birth. Christ didn’t just randomly bring up being born of the flesh as you’re asserting. Be honest with the text.

@WilliamEllison Ай бұрын

Amen

@SimplePerson-zq9tj Ай бұрын

What is The Point of what JESUS did for Us if Our Salvation depends on what We Do for Him?

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

So don’t have faith in him then

@SimplePerson-zq9tj Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 No what I mean is, FAITH Is What Brings Us to Salvation, but works is to say that what JESUS did was not sufficient and you need to add to it

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@SimplePerson-zq9tj faith, repentance and baptism are all necessary to come to Christ.

@gregshirk7220 Ай бұрын

Great vid brother, again!!

@seankennedy4284 Ай бұрын

"Except a man be born of water..." (John 3:5). Every man is born of water. This line is unnecessary, thus confusing. All that is necessary is to be born of Spirit.

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

Obviously it was necessary to explain the difference between a physical birth and a spiritual birth.

@seankennedy4284 Ай бұрын

@@cathi7610 _Obviously it was necessary to explain the difference between a physical birth and a spiritual birth._ In which case, all he's gotta say is "man is born of water" not "UNLESS a man is born of water." Makes it sound as though there is some physical act (e.g., water baptism) that is necessary.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@cathi7610 water means water and spirit means spirit. Only someone hellbent on butchering the text would say otherwise.

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 , go away.

@tongakhan230 26 күн бұрын

The Kingdom of God has two parts like any other Kingdom. The ruling body and those ruled by it. Those who are chosen to be a part of the ruling body are anointed by holy spirit. That is what Jesus meant by being born again. Those who get both, a water and spirit baptism. These chosen few will SEE God's Kingdom because they will rule IN IT IN HEAVEN (cf Revelation 5:9,10). Those not born again will: (Matthew 5:5) “Happy are the mild-tempered, since they will INHERIT THE EARTH. Those not born again will get everlasting life ON EARTH. Provided they prove to be: (Psalm 37:29) The RIGHTEOUS will possess THE EARTH, And they will LIVE FOREVER ON IT. These will NOT SEE God's Kingdom. But will benefit from its rule. (cf Reve 21:3,4).

@spacesciencelab Ай бұрын

How do we reconcile Acts 2:38?

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

@@spacesciencelab kzbin.info/www/bejne/gpeuZ2eri6aXmqcfeature=shared

@spacesciencelab Ай бұрын

@@OnoDiamante Thanks for the speedy response. 🥰

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

For a baptism rejecting Protestant it’s a contradiction.

@elitecompany1878 Ай бұрын

Baptism is not a requirement for salvation, it does however help with the process of sanctification

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

Book, chapter verse that nonsensical statement.

@troylee4196 Ай бұрын

Not a requirement but Jesus did it so we should too

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@troylee4196 naw. It’s most def. A requirement. Anyone who teaches otherwise is just Antichrist.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@troylee4196 why should we?

@BansheeKing22 Ай бұрын

@jesuschristsaves9067 It's not a requirement. The thief on the cross wasn't baptized and yet he entered heaven. Baptism is just a physical representation of one's faith but it's not a requirement to be saved.

@AmberMichealsCholeNicole-cj7sy Ай бұрын

What do you think about John C Lennox,??

@shanerochelle5468 Ай бұрын

First of all, none of us should attempt to teach anything biblical until we have a serious long-term deep understanding. I'm talkin years of praying for understanding & reading scripture & learning about the times in which the writers of the Bible, lived in. Repeating the gospel as to spread the good news is one thing. Stick to that. But as far as teaching bible... most of us aren't qualified. Very few. And certainly can't tell someone else how to be or act or how to remove the speck from their eye till we have removed the plank from our own. Most of what's taught these days is wrong as can be. Example: waiting on rature.? I got caught up in that too till I was shown dif thru much prayer for understanding & a ton of seeking after truth & reading, studying etc. I know now that most of what people are waiting for & "looking up" for now, already happened in first century. They won't or don't tell ya that in sunday school tho. Or how the church by order of constantine changed the sabbath to Sunday. Man has twisted so much its disgusting. Take time to pray, read, learn these things for yourself and don't be quick to take what others say as truth. Traditions are dangerous. And TEST THE SPIRITS. Be slow to speak, quick to listen, for truth & understanding. Love yall. Dig deep. Like gold or treasure, the truth you often have to dig & search hard for.

@lchimenz Ай бұрын

It's by adoption. Which is more powerful than natural son or daughter.

@thundershadow Ай бұрын

* It's by adoption. Which is more powerful than natural son or daughter. * You are out of your brain! Jesus is the only BEGOTTEN. Jesus is the natural-born son of God.

@user-ln8pd2sh8d Ай бұрын

Что за бред ты несёшь😂. Усыновленные сыновья и дочери никогда не могут быть выше и ближе чем родные. Родные дети всегда ближе, потому что они единородные тебе, тоесть они часть тебя самого, а усыновленные дети не являются частью тебя, они чужие и это никак не устранить. Единственное что ты можешь сделать - это любить их, заботится и относится к ним как к родным детям.

@lchimenz Ай бұрын

@@thundershadow Wow, I don't refer to Jesus. That is out of context of my statement. Jesus was God in the flesh, and the express image of the invisible God. The reason why Adoption is more significant than being born as a son or daughter is because A son can lose the rights of a inheritance. A son by adoption can not. So, in this regard our salvation and inheritance of being the children of God cannot be lost because we become so by adoption.

@SeanMikey Ай бұрын

Using scripture to justify your interpretation of scripture is circular. It’s why there are many Protestant denominations, because there is no justification when one can just use scripture against itself. When Christ left, he didn’t leave a Bible, he left a church. That church was developed by the apostles and past down through their own disciples. The early church agreed on things like baptismal regeneration and the real presence of the Eucharist. The assembly of the Bible was done through the church. Early Christians died protecting the church. How do you think early Christians worshiped if they didn’t have the whole word for centuries? Through tradition. That same church protected the divinity of Christ and how we understand Christ. You can’t just follow your own rendition of Christ. I’m sure you wouldn’t say jehova witness are Christians because they don’t even believe Jesus is God. Christology is very important and the church of the first 1,000 years did that. I don’t mean any offense or don’t mean to come off as rude if I am I apologize. The early church had a deep love for preserving the church and many died doing it. Please don’t be ignorant to the history, it is so rich. The church of the first thousand years is the Orthodox Church. Having a normative authority such as the church is needed so people don’t fall away to heresies. It’s prideful to interpret the Bible the way you want. The church did it by the guide of the Holy Spirit.

@nothing-xk8vr Ай бұрын

May God bless you and your ministry Ono. I love you brother. And may he bless your family as well, abundantly.

@digidox7900 Ай бұрын

Chrismation is the seal of the Holy Spirit. The anointing of believers is the reenactment of the anointing of Christ by the Holy Spirit. Chrismation occurs immediately after baptism.

@seven-in2je Ай бұрын

Wait, Are you orthodox onorato?

@Radical_racist Ай бұрын

God didnt make the dinosaurs

@tongakhan230 Ай бұрын

To see the Kingdom of God, someone has to be chosen. Like Ministers to Parliament have to be chosen. There is a group of Jesus' disciples who won't be in God's Kingdom. But live under its rule. Revelation 21:3,4

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@tongakhan230 are you a Jehovah’s Witness?

@tongakhan230 Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 : I don't get any revelations. I learn the truth from Jesus' appointee. Luke 12:42 And the Lord said: “Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one, whom his master will appoint over his body of attendants to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time? This appointee maintains the J W site which God has made available in over 1,000 languages. Give it a checking over.

@debbiewareing1178 Ай бұрын

@@tongakhan230 JW’s don’t even know who Jesus is!!! Michael the archangel…REALLY!!!

@tongakhan230 Ай бұрын

@@debbiewareing1178 : Well! Paul stated that Jesus was none other than Michael. Jesus identified himself with Michael. God didn't pick an angel from a hat to send. He sent his only begotten beloved son. The one who was Leader of the angels. (Matthew 3:17) Look! Also, a voice from the heavens said: “This is my Son, THE BELOVED, whom I have APPROVED.” People who claim that Jesus was Almighty God have to actually read the Bible. No man has SEEN God AT ANY TIME.' - wrote Jesus' faithful Apostle John at 1:John 4:12,20. Wasn't Jesus SEEN?

@debbiewareing1178 Ай бұрын

@@tongakhan230 And which scripture would that be when Paul stated Jesus was Michael??? Also Scripture for Jesus identifying Himself as Michael??? Incidentally I have read and studied the bible for years.

@Unseen_warfare. Ай бұрын

The Eucharist is the literal body and blood of Christ. That’s not debatable. That’s what the apostles believed.

@abkmshdso4382 Ай бұрын

Literal? Please explain further

@Unseen_warfare. Ай бұрын

@@abkmshdso4382 It’s a mystery and shouldn’t be explained. That’s how the Roman Catholics erred attempting to explain with logic The Eucharist to the Protestants. “Transubstantiation”. It’s his Body and Blood. That’s all I can tell you. We eat and drink God. True Orthodox.

@stanleywest2619 Ай бұрын

@Unseen_warfare. But the Eucharist is not found in God's word. As one observes the Lord's Supper the bread and wine do not become the literal body and blood of Christ, he was sacrificed once for our sins and will never be done again. The Lord's Supper is something we observe "to do in remembrance of our Lord's broken body and the blood he shed" inorder to save us and to do this til he comes.That's Bible not man's interpretation and this what the apostles taught and believed and was taught in the early church, down through the ages and even. now. Except for those who have have reinterpreted it to mean as you have stated. The Bible stands and is unchangeable and this is where we must stand.

@Unseen_warfare. Ай бұрын

@@stanleywest2619 (The Eucharist is mentioned in the Bible in several passages. In Greek, the term "Eucharist" can be translated as "Ευχαριστία" or "Θεία Λειτουργία." Here are some key passages where the Eucharist is mentioned in the New Testament: 1. 1 Corinthians 10:16-17 (Πρώτη Επιστολή προς Κορινθίους): "Το ποτήρι της ευλογίας, που ευλογούμε, δεν είναι η κοινωνία του αίματος του Χριστού; Τον άρτον που κόβουμε, δεν είναι η κοινωνία του σώματος του Χριστού; Διότι ένας άρτος σηματοδοτεί την ενότητα μας σε ένα σώμα - επειδή όλοι μας τρώμε από τον ίδιο άρτο." 2. Luke 22:19-20 (Κατά Λουκάν): "Και λαμβάνοντας έναν άρτος, ευχαρίστησε και έσπασε τον και έδωσε σε αυτούς, λέγοντας: «Αυτό είναι το σώμα μου που δίνεται για σάς. Κάνετε αυτό σε ανάμνηση μου.» Έπειτα έκανε το ίδιο με το ποτήρι, μετά το δείπνο, λέγοντας: «Αυτό το ποτήρι είναι η νέα συμμαχία με το αίμα μου που χυθηκε για σάς." These passages refer to the Last Supper where Jesus instituted the Eucharist with His disciples. These verses highlight the importance of the Eucharist in Christian worship and its significance as a symbol of unity and remembrance of Christ's sacrifice. One of the earliest Church Fathers who explained the Eucharist as being the literal body and blood of Christ was St. Ignatius of Antioch. St. Ignatius was a bishop of Antioch in the early 2nd century and a disciple of the Apostle John. In his letters to various Christian communities, he emphasized the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. In his Letter to the Smyrnaeans, written around 107 AD, St. Ignatius states: "Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God.... They abstain from the Eucharist and the public prayer, because they will not admit that the Eucharist is the selfsame body of our Savior Jesus Christ, which flesh suffered for our sins, and which the Father in His goodness raised up." This passage from St. Ignatius clearly shows his belief in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist and his rejection of any notion that it is merely symbolic. St. Ignatius' writings are among the earliest extant Christian documents outside of the New Testament, and his affirmation of the Eucharist as the literal body of Christ had a significant influence on the early Church's understanding of the sacrament.)

@Unseen_warfare. Ай бұрын

@imrukiitoaoffire1908 Ай бұрын

What can be done of those who believe that they believe, but they believe not? Is it simply the same matter as believing a false gospel? As it so clearly appears. And what of those who believe a false gospel? How can their hearts be softened unto repentance in Jesus Christ?

@Narrowminded1440 Ай бұрын

@@NonhathanI have personally experienced this and your answer is true. One must remember this… 1 Peter 4:12-13 (NKJV): 12 Beloved, do not think it strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened to you; 13 but rejoice to the extent that you partake of Christ’s sufferings, that when His glory is revealed, you may also be glad with exceeding joy. Our faith will be tested, even more so as we grow and mature in the faith. Sometimes our Father must give us a good spanking to bring us lovingly in line with the Truth. Also consider, this is a war. Soldiers must go through basic, graduate to AIT, then they go onto further training, all to make them ready to step onto the field of battle. The Word is the sword in hand. A master swordsman is not make over night and it is learning from the Master, we can wield this weapon, bearing the armor and charging over the berms of the devil whilst running by the cries of those wounded. All in defense and for the kingdom. This analogy I’ve borrowed from a fellow brother btw; a somewhat accurate description.😊

@JEBBY123IFY Ай бұрын

Does the word "should" make it possible in any way not to go to heaven? Shouldn't it be will or shall?

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

@@JEBBY123IFY “39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but SHOULD RAISE IT UP again at the last day. 40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I WILL RAISE HIM UP at the last day.” John 6

@MaddogKish Ай бұрын

I memorized John 3:16 a long time ago. It always said shall. Now it says should. God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son; That whoever believes in him SHALL not perish, but have eternal life. That is how it is written in my heart and mind.

@phariSEEphariDO Ай бұрын

💯💯💯

@BUDPUD Ай бұрын

keep uploading more

@gringo-h3u Ай бұрын

Great!!! The GOSPEL is LOVE and GRACE it is a FREE GIFT and it is SIMPLE FAITH!!! Jesus says, if you believe in me you have eternal life. Do you believe this? Yes Jesus we believe, Halleluja! Catholics and orthodox need to repent from their false gospel that condemns themselves!!!

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

Water now means flesh 😂😂😂😂👎🏾

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

Of course it does, silly. Water represents being born from the womb ... I e., the flesh which Nicodemus asked of Jesus.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@cathi7610 terrible misreading of the text. Nowhere in the entire gospel of John does water ever refer to the flesh. Show me in the Bible where it says that water represents flesh.

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 , you are a troll.

@abkmshdso4382 Ай бұрын

A woman's water breaks before she gives birth. That's natural birth.

@abkmshdso4382 Ай бұрын

The Holy Spirt makes us new. We are born again= spiritual birth

@BettyPellar-bu8zl Ай бұрын

Reborn people receive God as their savior; those who do not receive him are not reborn in God. Believing in God and receiving him are two separate things. "Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble." (James 2:19) People who are reborn are the ones who receive God as their savior. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: ( John 1:12) This verse explains being reborn perfectly. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: (1 Peter 3:21) It's not just believing in God; it's also having a good conscience towards God. If I tell God,I believe Jesus is God, but I will not try to yield to you, I do not have a good conscience towards God. I am not reborn, even though I believe Jesus is God. Those who do not have a good conscience towards God are the ones 2 Timothy 3:5 is talking about: "Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away."

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

Betty, the demons were not offered salvation. They are not human beings. Receiving is believing.

@BettyPellar-bu8zl Ай бұрын

Receiving is believing, but believing is not receiving. James 2:19 states: “Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?”

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

@@BettyPellar-bu8zl , the demons are not humans and they were not offered salvation.

@thundershadow Ай бұрын

It is talking about baptism. You are making a false implication that our first birth involves water but it does not involve the (a) spirit. Unless you are still born your first birth involves water and spirit. (/the spirit of Adam/). So like your first birth involves both water and spirit so also your rebirth involves both water and spirit. We MUST be born from above and it must be by the spirit of truth and baptism by faith. You denominationalists do NOT know what faith is.

@maxh_music Ай бұрын

Woah, my KZbin worlds are colliding! Ono and Ryan from NeedGod are the only Christian voices I see share the 100% accurate scripture. You two should do a podcast together!

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

Yeah, ok.

@maxh_music Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 Yeah, ok.

@flexoo.0 Ай бұрын

Collab w Ryan 🔥

@thundershadow Ай бұрын

You are ignorant people. God did not institute baptism for no reason at all. I've looked through out scripture... the purpose for baptism is not for an outward show of what has already taken place. Those words are not in scripture... you guys are making them up.

@lighturpl3 Ай бұрын

Well whats baptism for and why was Jesus baptized??

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@lighturpl3 those who reject baptism have no answer.

@debbiewareing1178 Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 No one is against baptism and it is perfectly fine to be baptised if you wish to. What is being said is that baptism is not what saves you or causes you to be born again. Believing by faith is the only condition required to be saved or born again. Most go on to be baptised and produce good works, BUT those works do NOT save you or cause you to be born again. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ alone, by grace ALONE, through faith ALONE and you will never perish but attain everlasting life.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@debbiewareing1178 1.) faith alone appears 1 time in scripture and it’s to prove the complete opposite. Nowhere in scripture does it say faith is the only requirement to be saved. All over acts does it say baptism is a requirement which is consistent with Jesus’ command to his apostles in the great commission.

@debbiewareing1178 Ай бұрын

@@jesuschristsaves9067 Acts 16:30/31 30And he brought them out and said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31So they said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household. John 6:29 John 6:40 John 6:47 John 1:12 Eph 2:8/9 Romans 4:5 John 17:3 Romans 10:9 Hebrews 11:6 Romans 4:3 And many more state clearly salvation is to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. Baptism is the symbolic act of showing your old self died with Christ and the new self born again. It does not say that it is a requirement of salvation.

@jesuschristsaves9067 Ай бұрын

@@debbiewareing1178 none of those say that belief is only requirement and if we interpret the scriptures the way you do, then repentance and receiving the Holy Spirit is not necessary since they are not mentioned. *faith PLUS works* “Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.” ‭‭James‬ ‭2‬:‭24‬ ‭KJV‬‬ *baptism saves* “The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:” ‭‭1 Peter‬ ‭3‬:‭21‬ ‭KJV‬‬ *repentance saves* “Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭2‬:‭38‬ ‭KJV‬‬ The way you read the text is that if something is not mentioned, then it’s not required. Your Bible has holes in it. Your gospel is a false gospel message.

@fourthplateau944 Ай бұрын

Jesus was baptizing before the giving of the Holy Spirit. Why?

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

Jesus did not baptize. The Apostle John was baptizing in water the repentance of sins because the one that could save them was coming and he would baptize them in the spirit.

@fourthplateau944 Ай бұрын

@cathi7610 John 3:22 ESV - After this Jesus and his disciples went into the Judean countryside, and he remained there with them and was baptizing. Who is 'he' in this verse?

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

@@fourthplateau944 , it doesn't say that Jesus himself baptized.

@fourthplateau944 Ай бұрын

@@cathi7610 then tell me who the 'he' is here. It says Jesus and HIS disciples went down. And HE remained there and was baptizing. Who is 'he'?

@fourthplateau944 Ай бұрын

@@cathi7610 here's another verse just below that one. John 3:26 ESV - And they came to John and said to him, “Rabbi, he who was with you across the Jordan, to whom you bore witness-look, he is baptizing, and all are going to him.” Who is the 'he' here? Did your pastor tell you that Jesus didn't baptize or did you just decide for yourself?

@oshea2300 Ай бұрын

But throughout the book of Acts during the transition.. some of them got the Holy Spirit after water baptism. That's a fact, but that doesn't happen anymore. Baptism didn't save them but they got the Holy Spirit after baptism.. just like Jesus Christ did. That was John's baptism.. the same baptism that Peter baptized with in Acts 2. All part of the transition

@DieCornelius Ай бұрын

Wrong

@raphaelfeneje486 Ай бұрын

Succinct and edifying. God bless!!

@calfox Ай бұрын

Why does your hair go from bald to several inches in length from video to video, what sorcery is this?

@GeraldJacobsYoutube Ай бұрын

It's a wig 😂

@Gregori-mi2vy8nc6y Ай бұрын

Dear Protestant friends, Jesus never said we must be born again, but because of bad translations of your Bibles, you have come to believe that Jesus said born again!! In the original Greek Bible, Jesus said, the follow " Ἀπεκρίθη Ἰησοῦς καὶ εἶπεν αὐτῷ· ἀμὴν ἀμὴν λέγω σοι· ἐὰν μή τις γεννηθῇ ἄνωθεν, οὐ δύναται ἰδεῖν τὴν βασιλείαν τοῦ θεοῦ. The original words γεννηθῇ ἄνωθεν means born from above! Please do research on the Greek and English Bible translations that are lacking in some errors; many Orthodox Christians are still reading the original New Testament in the original language, not a translation and not a Bible Version such as the King James Version.

@cathi7610 Ай бұрын

Basically it means the same thing ..

@PsalmChapter117 Ай бұрын

The KJB is your original in English, above the Greek.

@Gregori-mi2vy8nc6y Ай бұрын

@@PsalmChapter117 I am sorry, I don't fully understand what you are saying. If you ask if the Original Greek is better than the King James VERSION, the answer is YES; Greek is the original, and the King James is a version of the original. If you look at the spine of your King James Version of the Bible you would see the words Version, right or wrong? This is not rocket science!

@Gregori-mi2vy8nc6y Ай бұрын

@@PsalmChapter117 By the way, the King James Version is not the first English Bible. The Wycliffe Bible was published in 1382. Was this a good translation, in your opinion?

@PsalmChapter117 Ай бұрын

@@Gregori-mi2vy8nc6y The wycliffe is an inspired translation.

@EugeneHolley-rc6ry Ай бұрын

Neither one is correct, the one that is closest to being correct said that the Holy Spirit soften your heart and grants you faith, sounds like Calvinism going up against a Catholic.

@d3adp94 Ай бұрын

So explain it better then, please and thank you.

@evanwildermann7034 Ай бұрын

He is a Calvinist or a type of Calvinist from what I'm aware I know a lot of you guys get extra mad at calvinism and it seems like it back loading admittingly sometimes they do backload usually due to poor exogesis and using the esv to much or the nlt

@Lee40-e1b Ай бұрын

Nah

@jamesp877 Ай бұрын

@@evanwildermann7034 He's definitely a backload works Christian. He thinks works "prove" we're saved.

@Myrridan19 Ай бұрын

@@evanwildermann7034 we get upset at Calvinism because every single point in TULIP is false.

@ElizabethWells70 Ай бұрын

😢 he said @1:13 "being born of the Spirit is when the Holy Spirit softens your heart and 'grants you faith' 😢 when you hear the gospel" 😢

@danielmichailow7514 Ай бұрын

Hey, I was wondering about whether it's acceptance on our part or how does it work? Maybe you know any bible verses that talk about this, or other resources?

@estefanosssalibi8844 Ай бұрын

@@danielmichailow7514 John 3:16 KJV 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

@estefanosssalibi8844 Ай бұрын

@@danielmichailow7514 John 3:16 KJV 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

@estefanosssalibi8844 Ай бұрын

@@danielmichailow7514 John 3:16 King James Version 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

@estefanosssalibi8844 Ай бұрын

@@danielmichailow7514 John 3:16 King James Version 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

@iamjakebryant Ай бұрын

Yes!!!

@Akhgy Ай бұрын

2:44 if Jesus says you should be born again what is it? You should be born of water and Spirit ( News Flash that is baptism) 4:15- all through the Gospel it say Be Baptize meaning water baptism, water baptism is necessary for Salvation it’s a requirement to enter the Kingdom of God. Spiritual Baptism happen in Book of Acts in the upper room. Where the church were speaking in known tongues and Prophesying… they are in communion with God. What are you talking about? When you believeth in Christ automatically you will want to obey the Laws of Christ and Automatically you would want to be baptize.. At the end of judgement Both believer and Unbeliever will be Judge by their Works and Faith. Believth in Christ you follow his Commanded and you are required to be Baptized both of Water and then you will of Spirit. The Faith alone doctrine as plenty of loopholes with doesn’t adhere to the overall concept in the scriptures.. If you only have faith alone, you don’t need to walk righteously when, in James 5:1 he says he will be Judged and all teacher will be Judges more strictly.. So works is apart of it.. It’s Faith and Works complementary.. You can’t not be baptized of Water, Peter says Those that are baptized are saved, it doesn’t mean you are saved only with Baptism, it gives you a key card to enter the Kingdom of God. So it’s a compliment concept with the overall scripture. Cherry picking will get you no where. The Arrogance of you Protestants

@jedimasterham2 Ай бұрын

Sounds like both have some strange theological views.

@gem934 Ай бұрын

They always go to THEIR heretical church Fathers. As though their words and interpretation is above Gods. Go outside the Bible to prove their twisted doctrine.. “Now I said THEIR church fathers as in ones they choose to quote from”. God bless

@JesusChrist-SavesFromHell Ай бұрын

Are you stupid?!!! These ,,heretical church fathers” put together The Bible the written Word and Message of God !!! These people and Believers in The Lord Jesus Christ , were Lead by The Holy Spirit and were loyal and loving Christ far far more and with so much joy and hope in their hearts than we will ever do , Many of them were killed for their faith So have respect !!! Seek GOD for wisdom

@jmanuel722 Ай бұрын

They’re the heretics? It’s the other way around.

@Akhgy Ай бұрын

Heretical church father? Are you dumb are you saying the church was taking by Satan for 1800 years until reform? Your a more heretic to think Satan can overcome the Church of God, Where God is the Head of the church.

@dylanwilliams2202 Ай бұрын

So let me get this straight, you think that someone who lived closer to the time of Christ and the Apostles and knew the language and culture isn't going to know what the Bible means? But yet are going to listen to someone ~2000 years later? How is someones interpretation of the Bible ~2000 years later closer the God's than someone how lived during the time period that these were written?

@gem934 Ай бұрын

⁠ They didn’t understand scripture back then. There have always been heretics and people wanting to pervert Gods word, mock God. What a weak, lame argument to defend church father heretics. The ones that added to the gospel, the ones reformed theology goes to. The Word of God does not change. KJV.

@Phoenixmagnus Ай бұрын

😅😅 I guess the brit forgot verse 22-23 where Jesus went baptism there was water.

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

That in no way substantiates your position. You’re appealing to descriptive details of a passage to assert a prescriptive truth.

@MarathonMadeGalatians5-22 Ай бұрын

💪

@Parkerthebeliever Ай бұрын

W vid.

@pigzcanfly444 Ай бұрын

Kek, what are the odds? I just posted a comment under one of your threads, and here you are, haha.

@jabberwocky8021 Ай бұрын

Are you able to translate your comment into English? What is "W vid?"

@pigzcanfly444 Ай бұрын

@@jabberwocky8021 win video*

@jabberwocky8021 Ай бұрын

@@pigzcanfly444 Thanks!

@shaunmcdaniel780 Ай бұрын

He's C.O.C.

@CandiceGoddard Ай бұрын

I'm sorry but I disagree. People need to be baptised to be born again. Matthew 3:13-17, Mark 1:9-11, Luke 3:21, 22 and John 1:32 Jesus was baptised and then the Holy Spirit came down on him with YHWH in heaven saying, 'This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased' The actual reason why people need to be baptised is because the baptism is death. This goes back to the flood. God drowned the world because it was corrupted and evil due to the influence of angels breeding with human women and producing giants Genesis 6. He restarted creation, recreating his first commandment in Genesis 1:28 to Noah and his family in Gen. 9:1. Throughout the bible the substitution sacrifice (burnt offering) or any pagan ritual artefact was first burned and then submerged in water ie baptism. So the purpose of baptism is to drown the old life and be born again of water like how life started again out of Noah's ark. Our bodies are like arks. The simple fact is that if someone doesn't want to be baptised they don't have. I didn't want to either by my grandmother who had been rendered mute from a severe stroke was granted the ability of speech to utter just one sentence. 'I want you to', when my mum was talking to me about it and I was protesting. Those are the only words my grandmother said in the 3 years from when she had a stroke until she died. I honoured her wish. If you have some reason for not being baptised, that's fine. We'll all answer to Jesus on that last terrible day.

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

Wrong. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bKLOpGyceLx9eKMfeature=shared

@debbiewareing1178 Ай бұрын

The Holy Spirit fell upon Cornelius and his household the moment they believed, BEFORE they were baptised. Acts 10:43-47

@abkmshdso4382 Ай бұрын

Exactly

@jmanuel722 Ай бұрын

So you’re equating the flesh with water?

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

Being born of water is being born of the flesh.

@theomegawerty9688 Ай бұрын

"Amniotic fluid is sometimes called "my water" or "waters of the womb" during pregnancy because it's mostly water from the mother's body in the early weeks."

@GeraldJacobsYoutube Ай бұрын

Berthing a vessel. We are but ships in this river of life.

@dylanwilliams2202 Ай бұрын

@@OnoDiamante I don’t know who came up with the idea that John 3:5 was talking about a physical birth but that is the dumbest and most ignorant claim to make. Nicodemous was asking Jesus how to get into Heaven and you think Jesus first said “well first you have to be born”? Like really? No duh, obviously you would have to be born. There is no evidence of “born of water” being referred to as a physical birth during that time period in any writing and every Early Church father who quoted John 3:5 or any other verse around it *always* used it to talk about baptism. Paul in Romans 6:3-4 even backs this up by saying “Do you not know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 Therefore we were buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so *we also might walk in newness of life.”* and Titus 3:5 "he saved us, not because of any works of righteousness that we had done, but according to his mercy, *through the water of rebirth* and renewal by the Holy Spirit."

@OnoDiamante Ай бұрын

@@dylanwilliams2202 What does “born of the flesh” mean? How about Nicodemus’s reference regarding returning to his mother’s womb? Is your assertion that this isn’t in fact referring to a physical birth? Use a little bit of common sense.