Oscilloscope vs Multimeter

[@dashiellbark-huss6806]

I've been trying to understand the difference. For first time I finally got it within 30 seconds of this video. Why couldn't every body else explain it this way!

[@xyndijade2864]

Thank you so much! I have a good multi-meter and a micsig ato1004; I know how to use them, but I didn't know how to explain the difference to my trainee. He saw this video with me and now he gets it! Great job and thanks again

[@josephtucci3666]

Well done ! Well done for sure.

[@TheBillieyou]

Very helpful videos, 1-4 Thanks.

[@ricardosanchez772]

perdona, que equipo usas, donde consigo información sobre el osciloscopio.... gracias muy buen video

[@ozzstars_cars]

What's a scope? 😉

[@academia_diag]

Muito bom. Parabéns!

[@felixcat4346]

Why is the fluke, an expensive multimeter, show its reading as a fraction?

[@zoticus1]

Joseph Nicholas it's built like a brick Shit house and warrantied for life

[@jimle22]

@@zoticus1 You did not answer his question.

[@tonyfremont]

It converts amps of current to a voltage level. In this case 1 amp is converted to 1 millivolt (.001 volts), therefore 282 amps is shown as .282 volts. The meter is capable of directly reading amperage, but not more than 10 amps can be flowed directly through the meter.

[@Jimmeh_B]

A female mechanic??!!???? We don't get them over here in oz, I've met only 1 in my 15 years as a mobile machinist and heavy mech. Wanna move to Aus and get married?? lol, anyway.... 1: the metre's don't sample 4 times a second, in fact the metre doesn't sample at all, it's a constant measurement the display updates 4 times a second. 2: The DSO doesn't sample at 1 Meg sample per second, it's much much faster than that. 3: There is no such thing as "counter electromotive force" in the electronics field, there is back EMF which is sometimes referred to as "counter EMF" to my knowledge, it's incorrect and totally incorrect in this context. Also, if you wanted to measure the back EMF from the starter motor, you would need a completely different connection and setup in order to do so. I think the term you meant to use would peak or maybe initial current, you could possibly even be thinking of the term "in-rush current" but that too would be incorrect technically speaking. 4: Amperage, is not a word. The term is current. 5: it's not "like a graph" it is a graph, of voltage/amplitude per division against time per division. 6: You can't have "more frequency", you can say "higher frequency" or "more frequently" or "more peaks per time division/frame/screen" make up any time period you wish if it's measured and repeatable. 7: they are not "upper" and "lower" cursors, they are markers for want of a better term and in this case they are marking 1: the peak voltage, and 2: the noise floor. Probably marker 1 is actually marking the average and not peak, but I didn't set up the scopes parameters so I can only speculate on that one, as I am. 8: The scope read a peak of 1.531Mhz, I only bring this up as to point out my prior assertion that the scope is much faster than 1 Meg sample per second, for if it were only 1MEGs/s how could it have read a peak of 1.5Mhz? Sample rates must be a minimum of 2X the desired maximum signal measurement. For example, cd's recorded at 44Khz because 1: 22Khz is well out of human hearing so a 22Khz sample rate will easily cover the audio spectrum and 2: 44Khz (and 22 for that matter) are easily produced using standard crystal oscillator values and dividers. ..... freeze frame????! (data sample, it's a DSO) .... transitions/teeth it's a waveform it has cycles.... bah Point is, if you're going to "educate" or "inform" or "teach" something, how about you use the correct terminology? Anything else can only lead to ambiguity and misunderstanding for those who don't know any different, and you looking like a fool if in front of those who do know different.

[@ramnaracemotilal265]

The woman has an oscilloscope shut up

[@bunnyman6321]

Damn