PANASONIC LUMIX GH6 & LUMIX G9: My favourite wildlife and wildflower photos of 2022.

[@ЕщеВкуснее]

Super!

[@Denis-zb5pf]

The Bee at 5.53 did it for me Andrew. Thanks for sharing your passion.

[@jettysplash]

Hi Andrew. I love the photo of the Black birds among the flowers!

[@frankmartinez5114]

I enjoy your fantastic photography. Thank you for showing the camera setting.

[@rlgenge]

Great photography, just to see it is is a pleasure. But to capture it as well is a great reward. Great to see someone showing the capabilities of the Lumix camera and lenses.

[@Paul_C]

Seems you are getting better and better at this. Particularly the plant photography.

[@alanguile8945]

Fantastic pictures, love the final "Jungle Book" landscape. Great to see the G9 showcased.

[@davidharle8794]

Superb in every way. What a year!

[@pedro-my8ql]

wonderful photos, thank you

[@keithmayoh3070]

You’ve got some top shots in this collection, Andrew. Done well to have so many little birds in the collection too. They’re always very difficult.

[@AguilaDeOnix85]

The sea eagle with the crashing waves background was outstanding! All of your shots were outstanding! Thank you for sharing!

[@andrealeblanc4434]

Thanks for your great photos and great advice on the G9 and GH6. I wish you would add the species identifications.

[@joseluisgonzalezvillanueva361]

Un gran trabajo, estarás muy satisfecho.

[@andrewbland625]

Awesome photos! I've been shooting video and photos with the GH5S and find the photos to be sub-par much of the time. Noisy and not a lot of room for cropping in. I'm interested in the GH6. How do you think the photos will compare to those from the GH5S? To add a little to my backstory, I am primarily a videographer, but want the capability to shoot quality photos. I have also been looking at the Canon R5C but that means a $9K investment just to get started. I already have the Leica 100-400 and the Olympus 300mm, so for MFT I'm ready to shoot. I'd appreciate your thoughts and advice, as I don't want to go another summer shooting birds and wildlife in inferior still image quality. Thanks!

[@User_djy7529]

All photos are pleasing to watch,how is autofocus between the two cameras,thanks!!

[@naturesimagephotography]

Generally the AF is better on the GH6. The system is the same but works a little better, and you can use subject detection (human/animal) in all the AF area modes, while you can only use it in two AF area modes on the G9.

[@BarryBeckhamVideos]

👍

[@RichardBO9]

What gorgeous images! I am trying to decide between a GH6 and a G9. To this point, I have shot mostly stills. I see some opportunities to shoot video. Is the GH6 better at stills than the G9? Appreciate your thoughts.

[@naturesimagephotography]

The GH6 has the higher-resolution sensor and I am noticing a boost in fine detail. Also I think the autofocus is better. But it is packed with high-end video features that I know I am never really going to use. The G9 is a great camera for stills, does very good video. If you are not planning on being a very serious videographer, the G9 might be your better choice.

[@maxmohawke]

Hi Andrew, I thought maybe you could help me out a little. Since I got my G9 a few month ago I watched most of your videos and am very greatful for your work. I now thought of getting the 100-400mm lens, too. But I talked about it to my father, who has been to Africa a few times, and he meant, that 100-400 would be much too long most of the time and the other time it's not usable because of dust or heat reflected from the ground and what not. His most used lens was the 70-200mm on full frame. He takes pictures of big animals, not birds. Does his thoughts are matching yours? Thanks in regard and wish you well. Greetings from Germany

[@naturesimagephotography]

I use the 100-400 for almost everything in Africa. But unlike with birds, I rarely have it all the way out to 400 for the big animals, so often shooting somewhere in the range of 100-250. Dust and heat haze has been an issue for me once or twice, but our drivers can usually get us fairly close to the action so I don't often shoot at things so far in the distance as to be affected. Remember that a photo taken on a full-frame camera can bear a lot more cropping; with out micro 4/3 cameras you do need to get closer to the animals as cropping too heavily can be a problem. I'm not dismissing anything your father has told you, just saying what has worked for me.

[@maxmohawke]

@@naturesimagephotography Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge

[@stevecrawford4831]

What lenses did you use

[@naturesimagephotography]

I showed which lenses I used at the start of the video, and put the focal length on every photo.

[@stevecrawford4831]

What lenses did you use?

[@naturesimagephotography]

That was explained at length at the start of the video, plus I gave you the focal length on every photo.