RICHARD DAWKINS & BRIAN GREENE! EVOLUTION, PHYSICS, SCIENCE, ALIENS, GHOSTS, ATHEISM & GOD

Рет қаралды 42,409

Ай бұрын

#richarddawkins #briangreene #atheism #atheist #atheistviews #atheistvschristian #atheistsofinstagram #atheistrepublic #secularism #god #religion #religiousbeliefs #jesus #bible #christianity #pangburn #pangburnphilosophy #physics #aliens #ufo #uap #biology #evolution #science
An Evening with Richard Dawkins & Brian Greene in NYC on Nov 1st 2018.
The awe-inspiring Dawkins sits down with Theoretical Physicist Brian Greene to talk all things science.

Пікірлер: 221

@Pangburn Ай бұрын

JOIN US IN NYC ON JUNE 1st for ALEX O'CONNOR vs DINESH D'SOUZA on "IS THE BIBLE TRUE?" Tickets available here: www.pang-burn.com/tickets

@TheDjnatronic Ай бұрын

I wouldn’t go to NYC, host it in Texas next time

@adamjenkins3038 Ай бұрын

Brian Greene is an amazing physicist to listen to. So knowledgeable.

@hindsight2022 25 күн бұрын

He is very knowledgeable of the fairytales he's created . There is no experimental evidence to support his theory's .

@EmmetCromie 23 күн бұрын

@@hindsight2022 He understands a wide range of physics unrelated to string theory. He even said if string theory was proved wrong he would be happy. If he was proved wrong he would most likely still do physics.

@LucidityEngine 16 күн бұрын

This was so fun to listen in on, thank you!

@dushyantchaudhry4654 Ай бұрын

Brian Green : Richard have you started believing in god? Richard Dawkins: certainly not Brian Green: thank god.

@BabuSathyanarayana 12 күн бұрын

Ha Ha!

@llsnewzealandcafe 7 күн бұрын

修行が足りない😾＝Brian Greene👴🚑🏥 (Even I didn't think of god👴神 ) when I lost my mother last year🌌🔭Brian Greene fell short in his practice. Instead of beseeching a deity, he ought to have invoked "nature✨自然" requesting that all events align to aid in saving his mother's life. A true professional would have done just that ..。

@dushyantchaudhry4654 7 күн бұрын

@@llsnewzealandcafe he was being sarcastic

@lunainezdelamancha3368 Ай бұрын

I feel enlightened by these 2 extraordinary minds.

@BrianCarey 4 сағат бұрын

Wonderful level of conversation.

@daves2955 Ай бұрын

Two brilliant minds.

@waynerandall2428 Ай бұрын

really?

@MeBo-kp2lp Ай бұрын

Yes, really!

@sarahdickerson9068 Ай бұрын

Amazing. Thanks for sharing

@LifeandLifeMoreAbundantly Ай бұрын

“You know I love hymns and Christmas Carols. I feel at home in the Christian ethos. I feel that we are a Christian country in that sense”. -Cultural Christian Richard Dawkins 2024

@KillingTheEgo 18 күн бұрын

Nothing wrong with that.

@LifeandLifeMoreAbundantly 17 күн бұрын

@@KillingTheEgo I agree, those words are good; unfortunately for the West they are too little too late; he’s already undermined the West with his atheist folly. Now we’re reaping what was sown in the mind of generations of young people. The West will not stand apart from Christianity.

@henrismith7472 Ай бұрын

Recall the discussion with Jordan Peterson regarding his vision of DNA-like structures during a mushroom experience, and the counterpoint that DNA's appearance is common knowledge. You referenced Francis Crick. It's noteworthy that Crick also experimented with LSD, a 5ht2a agonist akin to mushrooms. The perception of DNA-like structures, which seem more tangible than our daily reality, is a fairly common experience and has been reported long before the modern scientific discovery of DNA.

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

All cells communicate with each other. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. In a communication system messages are predicted into existence by the receiver of the message using probability-- Shannon's information theorem. Predicting messages into existence is a syntropic process -- teleological. Biological cells are using syntropy to communicate with each other. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Potential information (entropy) is dual to co or mutual information (syntropy) -- information is dual. Potential or imaginary information (entropy) is dual to kinetic or real information (syntropy). Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. Male is dual to female. DNA or the double helix should be called the dual helix -- the code of life is dual. Hydrophilic is dual to hydrophobic -- hydrogen bonding or the DNA backbone is dual. A is dual to T, C is dual to G -- nucleotide bases. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Biological information (DNA) is dual.

@oswaldwillmott 16 минут бұрын

Dawkin's proposed origin of life explanation is so woefully inadequate.. given the complexity at the cellular level..

@benjamindees Ай бұрын

Wolfram claims to understand quantum mechanics. I can't say that I understand exactly how his "ruliad" differs from the many-worlds interpretation, but it does seem to be similar, and more complex.

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

The Schrodinger representation is dual to the Heisenberg representation -- quantum mechanics! AdS is dual to CFT. All cells communicate with each other. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. In a communication system messages are predicted into existence by the receiver of the message using probability-- Shannon's information theorem. Predicting messages into existence is a syntropic process -- teleological. Biological cells are using syntropy to communicate with each other. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Potential information (entropy) is dual to co or mutual information (syntropy) -- information is dual. Potential or imaginary information (entropy) is dual to kinetic or real information (syntropy). Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. Male is dual to female. DNA or the double helix should be called the dual helix -- the code of life is dual. Hydrophilic is dual to hydrophobic -- hydrogen bonding or the DNA backbone is dual. A is dual to T, C is dual to G -- nucleotide bases. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Biological information (DNA) is dual.

@alixhoward592 Ай бұрын

❤❤BRIAN❤❤

@yousefnadjarzadeh Ай бұрын

Man only has the understanding of the meaning that he himself has given that meaning, and this power of giving meaning to man is only through his intelligent self-aware mind, which is caused by his sensory organs, but the question is that this self-aware and intelligent mind of man, this self-awareness and intelligence What does he owe himself to? Because every creature that was created from the benefit of this air and earth is not beyond this air and earth.

@pdcdesign9632 10 күн бұрын

CREATURES were not created 😕 😮

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

@yousefnadjarzadeh 3 күн бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 What man has not managed to discover in the rules of the relationship of duality is the dual relationship between the celestial space and the air surrounding the earth, and my duty is to acquaint man with this type of dual relationship that has not been discovered by man until now.

@yousefnadjarzadeh 3 күн бұрын

@aremson4446 21 күн бұрын

Could it be possible that some part of the world dont think in quantitative reasoning but think in verbal reasoning? Although they could grab yhe quantitative aspect but they have to relearn?

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

@aremson4446 3 күн бұрын

All I'm deducing from this is that there's a duality in everything and we have the capacity for both. It doesn't explain how we function or what side of the scale we fall on. On these dualities, we have a spectrum, and we are tilted towards one side or the other due to a variety of reasons. Either because of our provenance, the food we eat, traumas of ancestral experience encoded into our DNA, and so on that allow us to give priority to one side or the other. We say life is about balance, indicating there's an imbalance, down to the way of thinking, the way of communicating, even to the very last cell in the body. The imbalance could be slightly off center or very extreme. It explains two kids raised the same way turning out completely different.

@hyperduality2838 2 күн бұрын

@@aremson4446 Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton or the duality of force. Attraction (sympathy) is dual to repulsion (antipathy), stretch is dual to squeeze, push is dual to pull -- all forces are dual. If forces are dual then energy must be dual:- Energy = force * distance -- simple physics. Everything in physics is made from energy or duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Electro is dual to magnetic -- electromagnetic energy is dual. Positive is dual to negative -- electric charge, numbers or curvature. North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields. Space is dual to time. Vectors (contravariant) are dual to covectors (covariant) -- dual bases or Riemann geometry. Curvature, gravitation or Riemann geometry is dual -- the equivalence principle. Duality means that there are new laws of physics. The conservation of duality (energy) will be known as the 5th law of thermodynamics -- Generalized Duality!

@JardineKarate1 Ай бұрын

Love these two. Brilliant

@SandipChitale 29 күн бұрын

About discussion at 29:00 Brian seems to be wondering about how physics gives rise to self experience. He should ask as simple question - if the brain is not working in a normal way will one have a self experience. If a brain is injured - parts of consciousness are affected. If the brain is under the influence of alcohol or drugs the conscious experience is affected. Under general anesthesia the consciousness is completely gone. The reason is that brain has subsystems for the perception of senses, but also has the subsystems that observe other subsystems and register and classify that as conscious experience. When those later subsystems are not in working condition we loose their function which is the internal recognition of consciousness. Think of it this way: - stage 1 - we use to think sickness was caused by wrath or curse of a deity - stage 2 - we found out that sickness is cased by microorganisms like bacteria or viruses (biology) - stage 3 - we precisely know the biochemistry of how viruses cause the pathology. In fact that is what allows us to develop precise vaccines - like mRNA COVID 19 vaccine. (molecular biology, bio-chemistry, organic chemistry, or simply chemistry) About consciousness: - stage 1 - we use to think there is something like soul or spirit that gives us consciousness - stage 2 - the consciousness is generated by the brain - stage 3 - we will understand how brains ( or its subsystems I talk about in paragraph 1) actually do it. We are at stage 2 with respect to understanding brain and consciousness.

@EmmetCromie 23 күн бұрын

From my own experience I would argue that we don't lose consciousness during general anesthesia. I could remember stuff from while I was under. People remember stuff even though they were brain dead. I belive it is just we typically don't remember such experiences.

@SandipChitale 22 күн бұрын

@@EmmetCromie From my own experience it was completely opposite. I do remember distinctly, when I was put under general anesthesia, for a appendicitis operation that, I was not conscious at all. I did not remember anything, absolutely anything after it wore off. It was very very different compared to a very deep sleep. For example, even in a very deep sleep, if there is a loud noise or someone pinches me I will wake up. But clearly I did not feel the operation or I am sure I would not have suddenly come out of anesthesia even if there was a life threatening earthquake or fire, when I was under anesthesia. It is as if those hours did not happen from the point of view of my awareness. Of course, the effect of general anesthesia varies from person to person. I presume though that you did not feel the pain of the procedure when you were under general anesthesia.

@EmmetCromie 22 күн бұрын

@@SandipChitale No pain but with a lot of focus I could remember that I experieneded something. Just because people typically don't remember does not mean something did not happen

@SandipChitale 22 күн бұрын

@@EmmetCromie Not sure what you mean. I know I did not have any sense of existence. It felt distinctly different than deep sleep. Just like your experience is true so is mine :) . It is possible that in your case the general anesthesia did not do its full job, so that you do not even get psychological trauma due to the invasive procedure. And it is true that anesthetics affect differently on different people. But most people I have talked to share my experience of completely being gone unlike deep sleep.

@tuk7raz 29 күн бұрын

❤Позвольте вопрос. Скорость света вакууме константа - это НУЖНО подтвердить прямым опытом? Или Вы пример, таких опытов может привести (опыт Майкельсона 1882/2024 г в этом плане выполнен всего на 50%). Почему легче современным физикам написать 1000 теории как ОТО Эйнштейна, чем проделать один прямой опыт за два столетия? В качестве учебного пособия такие ГИБРИД приборы, современная промышленность оптоволоконных гироскопов может выпускать…. - Мы можем пролить свет на тёмную энергию Вселенной, на размеры Вселенной и так далее

@janklaas6885 Ай бұрын

📍1:08:37

@startreck1673 Ай бұрын

👍

@burgesj7 Ай бұрын

I've noticed in recent Dawkins 'debates' he seems to be irritated, maybe defensive. I could just feel it. This was a pleasant change in his demeanor. I love Dawkins but there are times he rubs me wrong. i think it's more a culture thing than anything. English vs American and all that fun

@philwalkercounselling Ай бұрын

He'd always rubbed me up the wrong way historically to be honest but I've really grown in respect for him recently.

@robertmccully2792 Ай бұрын

He has bad anxiety with no peace.

@thebuffalo2263 Ай бұрын

Imagine being as smart as he is and being on a planet full of religious dipshits and corrupt politicians that value paper over all life on planet earth AND the earths health for that matter. I’d be fucking annoyed too. He’s surrounded by dopamine addict adolescent minded adults.

@curtcampbell8284 Ай бұрын

We often see him defending his atheism, but in this video he's freely discussing his earthly cosmology.

@kenadams5504 Ай бұрын

This is an old video ...I saw this video ages ago, (maybe years).

@SandipChitale 29 күн бұрын

About discussion at 1:30:00 Brain generates consciousness. Brain is a electro-chemical machine. Chemistry as a whole is based on quantum physics. So it is not clear why only collapse of wave function is micro-tubules is considered important for the generation of consciousness. The overall chemistry in the brain which is completely dependent on quantum effects is responsible for generating consciousness. The bonds in chemical reaction have to deal with "quantum" orbitals of electrons in atoms and molecules.

@anteconfig5391 21 күн бұрын

I agree. Even the protons involved in fusion within stars are quantum in nature and at those high temperatures and pressures found at the cores of suns they still uphold pauli's exclusion principle even during the fusion process. This is gonna sound a little crazy but I believe that even though quantum physics does not require consciousness that consciousness can, to some degree, control the evolution of quantum particles.

@SandipChitale 21 күн бұрын

@@anteconfig5391 Thanks to agreeing with my points but I am sorry to disagree with you about the point that - "onsciousness can, to some degree, control the evolution of quantum particles." It is an outdated notion for 40+ years and has been clarified several times by: Sean Carrol here - What Are Observers? ( at 0:55 mark ) (sorry cannot give direct link) Brian Green here - Brian Greene and Adam Riess: The Accelerating Universe answering my question about this at 1:45:35 Sabine Hossenfelder here - Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics: How are they related? It is true that original Copenhgaen group members believed that. Eugene Wigner believed that but later recanted it. So please make sure to note this.

@SandipChitale 19 күн бұрын

@@anteconfig5391 One more time here on Michael Shermer Show - Sean Carroll Quanta-and-fields episode at 34:30 mark for next 2 minutes. Also on KZbin. Just search for it.

@paradox4l Ай бұрын

finally someone who believes evidence of something is not evidence of the contrary. Brian Greene take note.

@robertmcclintock8701 14 күн бұрын

(^_^;))) the artistic proof that the universe was created is this. When you paint a shadow its the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room.

@robertmcclintock8701 14 күн бұрын

(　:ﾟ皿ﾟ) Flint printed life they knew since Flintstones cartoon. That is yaba daba do.

@ovidiulupu5575 29 күн бұрын

The third sky at Pavel mins that are superior realityes, beyond physics, if somebody not perceve, his problem...

@cartercanes Ай бұрын

Can I assume that quantum mechanics goes on inside our brains? I would think it would have to. So free will seems to be more like randomness. Are criminals in the world locked up because of randomness or brain damage? Does every man contain evil and kindness?

@livingart2576 Ай бұрын

Blaming bad actions on “randomness” is akin to blaming the devil. People have a choice and they need to accept responsibility for their actions.

@aremson4446 21 күн бұрын

Couldn't you call it randomness when you know every thought that goes on in our head/mind is random, we pick and choose which thought we want to follow through. Some people choose good ones, some people not so good. You could see some people do it with food, and so and so. People know the consequences of eating too much they still do it, they have babies they can't afford, they go to jobs they don't want when they could easily be doing what they want damn the consequences.

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

Randomness (entropy, uncertainty) is dual to order (syntropy, certainty). All cells communicate with each other. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. In a communication system messages are predicted into existence by the receiver of the message using probability-- Shannon's information theorem. Predicting messages into existence is a syntropic process -- teleological. Biological cells are using syntropy to communicate with each other. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Potential information (entropy) is dual to co or mutual information (syntropy) -- information is dual. Potential or imaginary information (entropy) is dual to kinetic or real information (syntropy). Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. Male is dual to female. DNA or the double helix should be called the dual helix -- the code of life is dual. Hydrophilic is dual to hydrophobic -- hydrogen bonding or the DNA backbone is dual. A is dual to T, C is dual to G -- nucleotide bases. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Biological information (DNA) is dual.

@SplatterPatternExpert Ай бұрын

The infinitely small volume that Dawkins mentions - I conceive of it as containing the energy, not the mass, of the universe. Mass formed later. And was all the energy contained in that volume? Or did the process create energy in a sort of runaway fashion? Maybe that volume was a portal through which the energy flowed, from another domain.

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

Big is dual to small. Enantiodromia is the unconscious opposite or opposame (Duality) -- Carl Jung. The concept of small requires the concept of big to already exist hence you are using duality. All cells communicate with each other. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. In a communication system messages are predicted into existence by the receiver of the message using probability-- Shannon's information theorem. Predicting messages into existence is a syntropic process -- teleological. Biological cells are using syntropy to communicate with each other. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Potential information (entropy) is dual to co or mutual information (syntropy) -- information is dual. Potential or imaginary information (entropy) is dual to kinetic or real information (syntropy). Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. Male is dual to female. DNA or the double helix should be called the dual helix -- the code of life is dual. Hydrophilic is dual to hydrophobic -- hydrogen bonding or the DNA backbone is dual. A is dual to T, C is dual to G -- nucleotide bases. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Biological information (DNA) is dual.

@SplatterPatternExpert 3 күн бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 inhale exhale hi tide low tide systole diastole daytime nighttime I think phillip glass the composer likes the number 2

@hyperduality2838 2 күн бұрын

@@SplatterPatternExpert Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton or the duality of force. Attraction (sympathy) is dual to repulsion (antipathy), stretch is dual to squeeze, push is dual to pull -- all forces are dual. If forces are dual then energy must be dual:- Energy = force * distance -- simple physics. Everything in physics is made from energy or duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Electro is dual to magnetic -- electromagnetic energy is dual. Positive is dual to negative -- electric charge, numbers or curvature. North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields (John MIchel Jarre). Space is dual to time. The Krebs energy cycle is actually dual, clockwise (trees, plants) is dual to anti-clockwise (mammals).

@iankelly6632 Ай бұрын

#Evolution did it 😂

@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын

Yes, #'s are shared "i" AM specially formed! Yes, even formulas can't exist! Without here 1ST!

@SandipChitale 29 күн бұрын

About discussion at 1:20:40 Brian talks about ultimately the reading from the instrument doing the measurement of a quantum state needs to be seen by some conscious agent and thus some may think consciousness has some role. That is a very misleading analysis. There is a confusion between two types of events (E1) vs (E2 or E3) : - event E1 where an instrument (say a video camera) makes a measurement on a quantum state to make it collapse and records the reading - event E2 when a conscious entity - say Alice reads that recorded reading and groks what it was. Note this can happen 10 years later and 1 billion miles away. - event E3 when a conscious entity - say Bob reads that recorded reading and groks what it was. Note this can happen 20 years later and 2 billion miles away. sure. But Event E1 is when the collapse happened. The lab may even have been destroyed the next day after the instrument with recorded reading was taken out and sent first to Alice and then to Bob. What does it even mean to talk about Alice collapsing the quantum state after 10 years, when the lab was destroyed the next day. That is absurd. E1 is not the same as E2 E1 is not the same as E3 E2 is not the same as E3 but the measurement only happened at E1 and the quantum state collapsed then. So this shows us that a instrument like a video camera - which every one will agree collapsed the wave function. Sure a macroscopic, conscious entity present in the lab could have done the "measurement" to collapse the wave function, but not because it is conscious, but because it is macroscopic. The labs that develop quantum computers do not shields the quantum state from consciousness of human lab personnel. They put the quantum state in vacuum separated from air molecules lest they will destroy it. So can we please stop bringing in consciousness into Quantum Physics context from now on?

@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын

Our beautiful shared "i" AM will say, it's vital! For an infant daughters to be raised by strongest Heirs Hosts! Why?

@robertmcclintock8701 29 күн бұрын

(゜ロ゜) Natural selection is the character flaw in evil that is integrity is more important than life otherwise evolution is tragic circumstances with nothing intelligent happening. Almost everyone survive until they reproduce. Nothing is getting selected except for the character flaw in evil. I found a replacement for the character flaw in evil that I liked but God makes me forget things that will cause me trouble.

@mattorr2256 20 күн бұрын

How did you come to this conclusion? Is it just your opinion or what you believe? Claims like yours here require evidence. If there is no evidence, then it must be dismissed.

@robertmcclintock8701 20 күн бұрын

@@mattorr2256 I'm a spy classified at birth that is KZbin song like a g6. It's almost impossible to have an original thought. If they made something to spy then they already knew about it. My definition of natural selection is my only original thought.

@mattorr2256 18 сағат бұрын

@@robertmcclintock8701 what????

@SandipChitale 29 күн бұрын

"Shut up and calculate" dogma hindered progress in fundamental understanding of quantum mechanics. "Hard problem of consciousness" dogma is hindering the progress in understanding of consciousness. Both dogmas should be rejected. Science should never be asked to stop asking why? and how? questions.

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

Questions are dual to answers. All cells communicate with each other. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. In a communication system messages are predicted into existence by the receiver of the message using probability-- Shannon's information theorem. Predicting messages into existence is a syntropic process -- teleological. Biological cells are using syntropy to communicate with each other. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Potential information (entropy) is dual to co or mutual information (syntropy) -- information is dual. Potential or imaginary information (entropy) is dual to kinetic or real information (syntropy). Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. Male is dual to female. DNA or the double helix should be called the dual helix -- the code of life is dual. Hydrophilic is dual to hydrophobic -- hydrogen bonding or the DNA backbone is dual. A is dual to T, C is dual to G -- nucleotide bases. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Biological information (DNA) is dual.

@PieJesu244 Ай бұрын

No lines just watershed events. Not a clue and that's OK

@johnbeswick5972 27 күн бұрын

Why do all mammals have 2 eyes , 1 nose , 2 ears and 1 mouth

@kristinchristopherson4878 10 күн бұрын

I think you must have 2 for peripheral vision. No, no depth perception, that's it. A two-eyed person who loses one eye loses their depth perception.

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

"In the kingdom of the blind the one eyed man is king. The two or dual eyed man is therefore by definition a God". You face is symmetric:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions) -- quantum duality. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance -- brain hemispheres. All cells communicate with each other. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. In a communication system messages are predicted into existence by the receiver of the message using probability-- Shannon's information theorem. Predicting messages into existence is a syntropic process -- teleological. Biological cells are using syntropy to communicate with each other. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Potential information (entropy) is dual to co or mutual information (syntropy) -- information is dual. Potential or imaginary information (entropy) is dual to kinetic or real information (syntropy). Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. Male is dual to female. DNA or the double helix should be called the dual helix -- the code of life is dual. Hydrophilic is dual to hydrophobic -- hydrogen bonding or the DNA backbone is dual. A is dual to T, C is dual to G -- nucleotide bases. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын

Grieves ME! For many can't even recognize one another in front! Why revealed for thee to RECOGNIZE? If ye can't even recognize one another? What is a 2 STATES? IF CAN'T EVEN RECOGNIZE ONE ANOTHER IN FRONT?

@moniqueshizzle Ай бұрын

WHAT

@AlhambraDream Ай бұрын

Brian should let him speak and finish his sentence.

@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын

Ye all are SO specially formed! As ye see #'s! Yes, I so love all my #'s specially formed!

@johncarter1150 Ай бұрын

Nonsense

@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын

Many will say the CORNER STONE!

@margrietoregan828 22 күн бұрын

This is sooooo last century. How terribly disappointing ……

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

@tomashultgren4117 16 күн бұрын

Key quotes from Dawkins regarding what he expressed in his book “The Selfish Gene”: “It’s I suppose my most original contribution.” “It’s not really a testable hypothesis, it’s just a different way of looking at what is already familiar”. So - to put it bluntly - pure conjecture. No better than religion. The hypothesis that made Dawkins famous - "the Selfish Gene", the idea that "the gene is the unit of selection", the idea that "the individual is the tool of the gene", the idea that "the body is the machine for passing on the genes that created it" - these are all ideas that cannot be backed by science.

@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын

Pop even I can be silent! Is like...Noone can uproot nor shaken but here to stay for good. Who can shut the "OPEN DOOR"? I'll wait right Here! None! Noone

@blip0o0 Ай бұрын

Well put.

@davidbentley4731 Ай бұрын

Can we stop asking “why” there is something rather than nothing. There is no why. There is no reason or purpose that something exists. The question at best is “how” things have emerged as they have. We also will likely never know what came before. It’s a pointless question.

@rmvanravesteijn Ай бұрын

You're really missing the point.

@rickybloss8537 Ай бұрын

Nothingness has no limitations on possibilities. Otherwise it wouldn't be nothingness. Only possibilities are all the autogenic rules a finite turing machine can compute. Therefore those rules come into existence within nothingness. Time is the application of the rules onto each other. Space is the relationship between the rules. Quantum mechanics is a result from all the possible application orders of the existant rules. General relativity emerges from the dimensionality of a region of space changing due to space deleation/folding rules. The expansion of the universe are the self inserting 3 dimentional rules exponentially creating more of themselfs. Don't know how dark matter could fit into this hypothesis. But outside that idea consiousness is a story generated by a neural game engine for use by a simulated person for generating actions, predicting the future and planning around to maximize our reward function.

@trout3685 Ай бұрын

It's the same thing as an archeologist asking why there's a certain style of rock in a region. Not only that but it's really a fascinating thing to consider. Why are we here. Why is anything real. It's amazing and scary.

@rosemariemann1719 Ай бұрын

Yes, David, but we can't help being curious : People always say how "curious" we are..😊. Our enquiring minds have led us to discover so many things.... When folk ask " why? " , we say, " why not ?". I " love " Prof' Dawkins.. great teacher.... a gentle , sensitive human .🦉😊 🇬🇧😊🌹🦉🌿✴️🇬🇧

@rosemariemann1719 Ай бұрын

@@rickybloss8537 Ricky, that's a lot to take in : thank you ! 🙂🦉🤔🦉 🇬🇧🤔🦉✴️🌿🌹🇬🇧

@waynerandall2428 Ай бұрын

the conversation is circular and boring.

@TheDjnatronic Ай бұрын

Because they are missing the most important element GOD

@hyperduality2838 3 күн бұрын

@James-ll3jb 10 күн бұрын

Brian Green is the Bill Maher of 'Mr. Science Guy' monologists, a superb superficialist and trivializer! Dawkins is a known liar...

@ALavin-en1kr Ай бұрын

Supposing the situation was reversed and a religious person being interviewed said they wanted to get rid of science? What arrogance, Dawkins stating he wanted to get rid of religion, what happened to tolerance. Dawkins also said Jewish people have a strong reason for religion but Christ being crucified is not a reason for Christians be loyal to Christianity and to live its message? Religion being 500 years old, really? Native peoples and all of humanity were religious going back to the earliest days on record? What ignorance you are expressing Mr. Dawkins. The tape cut off, someone likely killed it as it was veering into the ridiculous.

@johncarter1150 Ай бұрын

Nonsense

@ALavin-en1kr Ай бұрын

@@johncarter1150

@ALavin-en1kr Ай бұрын

Sense not nonsense.

@13shadowwolf Ай бұрын

Religion has caused you to view many things backwards. He knows far more about Christianity than you do.

@sarahdickerson9068 Ай бұрын

Seems like you missed the whole point of that part. The accusation of arrogance seems a projection to me.

@milDelux Ай бұрын

Dawkins doesn’t know how or why or what happened but he’s SURE that darwinianism is real 😂

@damienschwass9354 Ай бұрын

Darwinianism?!! Do you mean evolution? Evolution IS true. It happens. Cope.

@milDelux Ай бұрын

@@damienschwass9354 if you say so

@damienschwass9354 Ай бұрын

@@milDelux not if I say so- it simply is, regardless.

@milDelux Ай бұрын

@@damienschwass9354 you’re about as convincing as Dawkins is.

@damienschwass9354 Ай бұрын

@@milDelux whether you’re convinced or not is irrelevant.

@lodhs Ай бұрын

A child talking to a man

@TheDjnatronic Ай бұрын

Maybe one day Dawkins will grow up

@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын

Heirs Hosts shared, "i" AM will say a BLINK nor a TWINKLE OF AN EYE! As HE IS! As HERE all HIS shared "i" AM. A twinkle of an EYE! Speed come here! Remind and comes with comfort concerning Who? Where thy motion nor given the approval? From Thee LORD! Why?

@johncarter1150 Ай бұрын

Because you are nonsense and irrelevant.

@sjames1955 Ай бұрын

Dawkins is a bigot

@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын

For HIS Beautiful will say, remember HATE is murder unto HIM! Yes, HE was denied by a kiss before! Nor denied in front of HIS Heir Host Pilot! Why PILOT washed HIS HANDS? Knows the Holy BLOOD STAINS UPON accusers hands! Yes, How else can all the accusers came with curses upon one another! To be set underfoot? Prepared for the little Child born "i" under HIS FEET! COME My little child born "i" and take thy seat with Thy "AM"! The "i" AM. The I AM singularity shared "i" AM come forth! Sincere conversations now can take place! Between "i" and His AM. Remember where increase belongs? And know who gives increase?

@johncarter1150 Ай бұрын

The nonsense jesus bot.

@fredcrown-tamir698 Ай бұрын

Matthew 11: v 27-All things have been delivered to Me by My Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father. Nor does anyone know the Father except the Son, and the one to whom the Son wills to reveal Him. God decides who and when we shall know Him.

@arifsaleem5467 Ай бұрын

Who coined this nonsense?

@johncarter1150 Ай бұрын

Jesus is not in the house or anywhere else...

@jakesmith6337 Ай бұрын

@@arifsaleem5467Mathew 11.27, can’t read ?

@13shadowwolf Ай бұрын

What a pile of absolutely useless nonsense.

@arifsaleem5467 Ай бұрын

@@jakesmith6337 Matthew? It's a fictional character, even you know that.