A video on the hyperbolic functions and maybe some complex-valued analogues would be greatly appreciated and I think interesting.
@AndrewDotsonvideos5 жыл бұрын
Instructions unclear. Have socks in my mouth and belt around my neck in a batman costume.
@cameronspalding9792Ай бұрын
What the heck?!
@Assault_Butter_Knife5 жыл бұрын
For cos(X) couldn't you just use the sin(X) expansion and then just substitute every X with (x-pi/2)?
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
You could, but that would be super impractical.
@dexter23925 жыл бұрын
yeah but that would be even messier and longer to write than using double angle identity for sine
@Gustavo_01075 жыл бұрын
When will we have another engennering 101 pap?
@kummer453 ай бұрын
This is a very delicate subject that requires Tannery’s theorem limit swap for infinite series and infinite products. It’s an advanced topic in complex analysis, real analysis and the study of series and products. It’s good to have an intuition like this.
@birupakhyaroychowdhury9745 жыл бұрын
Papa flammy is just excellent....👍🏼
@nicolassamanez65905 жыл бұрын
pappa flammy, how come these products dont have a namesake like taylor or mclaurin series do? why arent they named after pappa wheeler?
@cameronkhanpour30025 жыл бұрын
wouldn't it be easier to express sin(x) = x(product(cos(x/2^k))) with k=1 to infinity?
@hungryfareasternslav18235 жыл бұрын
That would be infinite sum inside the infinite product!!!
@tanvec5 жыл бұрын
Have you ever slid into frame, then fallen square on your ass? Editor note: I watch for the math and laugh at the “bloopers”
@josiproak7395 жыл бұрын
Damn papa flammy, you better get serious ad revenue for this, youtube displayed 5 ads in the video :P
@ianmathwiz75 жыл бұрын
If the sin infinity grill can be derived from the cotangent infinity boi, does that make the sin an infinity trans grill? Trigonometry: changing genders before it was cool.
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
For tan(x), the answer is yes: you can move the limit to the front and the collect the terms for both product and cancel out the odd numbers, leaving only the even numbers, because once again, both products converge absolutely, and we know they do because you just proved them by derivation. Hence, yes, the tangent product is just the sine product but with even indeces instead of natural indeces.
@NintendoGamer7892 жыл бұрын
Bruh what double check that, what you get is just 2sin(x/2). I don't think there is a nice simplification that exists for tanx.
@angelmendez-rivera3512 жыл бұрын
@@NintendoGamer789 Yes, you are right, that was my mistake. I must have been thinking of something else. There is no cancellation of the terms. However, you can still bring the limit to the front. That part of my comment stays accurate.
@RM-gc8lx2 ай бұрын
@@angelmendez-rivera351 Then delete your comment, or edit it, you muppet.
@MrRyanroberson15 жыл бұрын
secant is related to the secant line, therefore whichever trig function it is related to is just an accident. 1/cos happens to equal the length of a secant line
@ronanglemusic19935 жыл бұрын
Hey Pappa, love the videos!
@tommasoseverini37675 жыл бұрын
10:55 the proof is left as an exercise for the reader..... TRIVIAL!!!
@dectorey72335 жыл бұрын
Papa Flammy making my slow 9-5's bearable :D
@ericb72915 жыл бұрын
Is the infinite product of (1-x^2/(pi^2*k^2)) equal to 1 for all x?
@F-S.4 жыл бұрын
Is there a product formula for the natural log?
@PapaFlammy694 жыл бұрын
yup! :)
@Noam_.Menashe3 жыл бұрын
I think you can get it from the product of e^x. Not sure though.
@olli36862 жыл бұрын
sin(x)=cos((x-pi/2)(-1)^j+2*pi*k) = cos(x-pi/2). Couldn’t we substitute to get rid of the x by the infinite product?
@jackhanke3435 жыл бұрын
All the "drake" identities
@PSNsomeonealive5 жыл бұрын
excellent video papa
@birupakhyaroychowdhury9745 жыл бұрын
No he's papa flammy....
@MaxxTosh5 жыл бұрын
Hey Daddy Hotboi, if you can write out this infinite product for the trig functions, which are functions based on x^2 + y^2 = 1, and for the hyperbolic trig functions which are functions based on x^2 - y^2 =1, can you find infinity bois for all x^p +/- x^p = 1?
@orangeguy54635 жыл бұрын
why isn't it simply cos(x) = sin(x + pi/2) =(x+pi/2)prod(1-(x+pi/2)^2/(kpi)^2) ? Or is this an equally valid, but not as useful product for cosine, when it comes to analytic number theory?
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
It is equally valid, but as you may suspect, it is totally useless
@rot60155 жыл бұрын
papa do you follow the season 3 of attack on titan?
@sofianemohammed80485 жыл бұрын
flammable maths Can you integrate tan x from 0 to π/2 😈 👿 ?
@sofianemohammed80485 жыл бұрын
Flammable Maths yes i know but Dr πm integrated it with à hard method i want to see your method because my career ended so as to find the solution 😂😂 please do the video soon 😍
JJ - they evaluate diverges integrals like x^x and x^-x and 1/x from 0 to 1 etc ... so i hope that they evaluate the integral of tan x from 0 to π/2
@ai_serf5 жыл бұрын
Can someone please explain the engineer comic strip?
@leofisher12805 жыл бұрын
Engineers often use sinx=x to estimate the values of sinx. It works pretty well for low values. (essentially its just the first value of the Taylor series).
@hamiltonianpathondodecahed52365 жыл бұрын
*yes*
@soriac98985 жыл бұрын
How about a video proving the riemann hypothesis ? :v
@duncanw99015 жыл бұрын
Probably doesnt get u anywhere but the denominator of the secant one is a difference of squares
@QasqaZhol5 жыл бұрын
👍
@everlastingauraX5 жыл бұрын
2:50, use pepega, it sounds funnier. :D
@justkarl29223 жыл бұрын
You can tell infinity grills are not that much to be simplified
@tszhanglau57475 жыл бұрын
You can say you have "speech 100" (I hope you get the reference)
@metecatl45862 жыл бұрын
very nice, but there is another way also.
@aweebthatlovesmath42202 жыл бұрын
Infinity boi
@phukaoprommolmard52825 жыл бұрын
A S S U M E S M A L L A N G L E
@shandyverdyo76885 жыл бұрын
Meh.. Infinity BOIZZZ Unch... unch... -_-
@zackbartley31945 жыл бұрын
i!??
@Mathmagician735 жыл бұрын
Sir i have one beautiful, crazy question. I think you should make video on that question if you don't mind can i send u question. Pls give me your mail id or social media weblink . Sir trust me its really beautiful question. Thank you:)
@koichi85295 жыл бұрын
Are you German?
@koichi85295 жыл бұрын
Flammable Maths Great. I think Deutschland is best country in the world.
@willnewman97835 жыл бұрын
You say all of these things are part of analytic number theory, but you have yet to show us anything involving what I think of as number theory: integers, primes, algebraic numbers, etc.
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
will newman Number theory and analytic number theory are not the same thing
@willnewman97835 жыл бұрын
@@angelmendez-rivera351 From wikipedia: "In mathematics, analytic number theory is a branch of number theory that uses methods from mathematical analysis to solve problems about the integers." What he has done does not prove anything about the integers.
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
will newman Okay, and? Thank you for literally proving my one and only point: that they are not the same thing. It says "branch of number theory", not "the same as number theory." Stop trying all intellectual when you can't tell apart my claims from his and you're reading comprehension is so bad it proves my point yet you think it proves yours. I've said all that was needed to say. I'm done with this conversation. Bye.
@willnewman97835 жыл бұрын
Let me translate that "Oh, I see that I am wrong, so I to pretend like I was write and end the conversation."
@aweebthatlovesmath42202 жыл бұрын
@@willnewman9783 theory that has numbers lol that's how i define it