I love the fact conscripts were the most cost effective unit in taking those out, even more cost effective than prism tanks (48 lost vs 5 prism tanks for the small tower). Of course this isn't surprising because those towers overkill every target, so when the target is a conscript, they still need the same amount of time to spend on him like they do an apocalypse tank.
@Slywyn2 күн бұрын
Honestly it seems like even though the Paris tower appears to be weaker than the Mayan tower HP/armor-wise, the longer range and slightly faster attack speed make a huge difference.
@jedfiller4145Күн бұрын
Yeah, and unit speed really seems to be the great equalizer. The Mayan Tower performs better when unit speed negates the range advantage.
@AlphaAuroraКүн бұрын
Yeah, a lot of overkill on both
@draisensКүн бұрын
Oh yeah. Especially during that soviet mission where the range is further amplified. That was insanity
@Klonter77Күн бұрын
The Eiffel Tower is much stronger, if only because you can move teslatroops there and it has enormous range!
@estellebright2579Күн бұрын
It would be something entirely if both tower’s attack has some sort of AOE effect, meaning for paris tower its the heroic tesla trooper tesla attack and for Mayan tower prism tank attack equivalent. Some of those matchups would turn into a total landslide for towers.
@louieosumo2 күн бұрын
Slave: what can i do? Enemy: easy, be killed
@Sirvantir2 күн бұрын
Fantastic! I like how the v3s were attacking from the tower from the prism side XD
@louieosumo2 күн бұрын
Because the mayan is short range
@arrowghostКүн бұрын
It's basically range VS health points respectively.
@AlbertChang17Күн бұрын
Why don’t the French build Eiffel Towers for base defense? Are they stupid?
@dragonstormxКүн бұрын
How did V3s miss a stationary target?
@somebody700Күн бұрын
They attacked the miners first (3 of them)
@lkangarooКүн бұрын
@@somebody700 Oh to be a miner seeing enemy V3s in the distance...