I appreciate this lecture on Parsons' AGIL scheme. Dr Maeshall is a skillful lecturer. Listening to this lecture helped me gain some understanding of this part of Parsons' theory of how a social system works if it is working well.
@KenCAgronАй бұрын
Spelling Correction: Dr. Marshall
@21jumpstreet738 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much from a student of the university of west indies cave hill campus in Barbados
@mandlamaphisa65662 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much Debra for a wonderful explanation. It's all clear now. Siyabonga dadewethu
@dariagubina89588 жыл бұрын
really nice! I'm studying in Germany and my English is not so good, but u was talking slowly, so I could understand more than from the class. thanks!
@Sipmeister0078 жыл бұрын
You did an excellent job! I believe you should have mentioned that Parsons model was developed from the previous works of french sociologist Emile Durkheim, Parsons critiqued the many shortcomings of Durkheims funcionalist theory. This model can then be described as a neo-functionalist perspective.
@debramarshall9058 жыл бұрын
+syprian isaacs Thank you for your comment. Parsons (and all of the functionalists) have a foundation in the work of Emile Durkheim and Auguste Comte. I don't think this model rises to the level of neo-functionalism, which is a specific theoretical branch which attempts to combine functional and conflict perspectives--for that you'd need to look to the work of contemporary theorists Jeffrey Alexander, a disciple of Parsons.
@randomhandle09.5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for helping me survive SAP.
@samanthafernandes39025 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the video!! Saved my life
@jairraimondi9 жыл бұрын
Thanks Debra, I understood Parsons much more than my own language.
@natalyepps44611 жыл бұрын
Hello Debra, I really liked your lecture. I was wondering if there is anything written about how Parsons and Merton's theories interact to explain conflict and rebel groups.
@debramarshall90511 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Parsons focus left little room for dysfunction (think of dysfunction as the functional theorist’s explanation of conflict). Merton does explain rebel groups-see my video “Merton’s Typology.” Much of Merton’s work was in response to Parsons. Merton studied under Parsons--Parsons was caught up with GRAND theory; Merton was focused on MIDDLE RANGE theories. Where Parsons thinks grand theories explain complex societies, Merton concentrates on how complex systems do NOT function for all.
@Zamudiokid8 жыл бұрын
Latency is most important. Importance order goes in opposite order-LIGA. Latency is the cultural system to refine motivation; is the heart the circulates the blood of "moral."
@markprostars3 жыл бұрын
hi could u help me with parsons?
@Zamudiokid3 жыл бұрын
@@markprostars sorry this is from so long ago.
@TaidorReath Жыл бұрын
Hello Debra. I don´t understand something and I'd really like you to help me, ¿What is the relationship between Systems Levels and the AGIL? I am not sure, but I think that maybe the Systems Levels are the representation or the solución to the AGIL. Thanks!
@vidhiagrawal34 жыл бұрын
Thankyou from India💙
@Happiness.7896 жыл бұрын
Very good explanations. Thanks from india.
@markprostars3 жыл бұрын
Debra. what comes first. pattern variables or agil paradigm?
@asishb66737 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot
@titosoysoy5824 жыл бұрын
Perfect ❤️
@nelsoneduardocastilloayala50802 жыл бұрын
Data Bias reproducen la "normalidad", pero la Big Data y los algoritmos (reflejo de normalidad) también son fuente de cambio (inducido o aleatorio). El esquema presentado es demasiado estático (estructuralista), debe completarse, al menos, con los conceptos de condicionamiento y control y de morfogenetica (para dar cuenta de la dinámica y el cambio y superar la entropía)
@jaysonpenachos33684 жыл бұрын
Watching 2020 learner😊
@AtsuePop8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video! In fact I guess I see what you're meaning but... that seems so abstract to me :/ Don't you have a concrete example showing how a system is using these 4 procedures? because I see on so many websites That Adaptation = economy Goal Att.= Politics Integration=social Latency= Culture. But my teacher told us that for example a politician should take their resources in the population to try to be elected!... So adaptation isn't only a matter of economy, right? so why does it figure EVERYwhere? Thank you so much for your help :)
@chulawrence415611 жыл бұрын
does Parsons mean society influences and SHAPES individuals? therefore, we are the PRODUCT of our society.
@zowster11 жыл бұрын
UVT represent
@angievargas836810 жыл бұрын
Hello Debra. I don´t understand something and I'd really like you to help me, ¿What is the relationship between Systems Levels and the AGIL? I am not sure, but I think that maybe the Systems Levels are the representation or the solución to the AGIL. Thanks!
@debramarshall90510 жыл бұрын
Hi Angie, Yes, I think you're on the right track. Parsons' and Bales AGIL scheme represents the main components of the structure of society. They use the AGIL to explain how the structure exists. So, its not necessarily a solution, but it is a representation of the primary parts of the structure in which we all must function.
@angievargas836810 жыл бұрын
Ok, thank you. Have a nice day
@angievargas836810 жыл бұрын
Hi again. After reading more, I've found this graphic and it doesn't help because it puts the AGIL in System Acción, then it's like te Social System were divided in 4 systems, the behavioral system, the cultural system, the personality system and the accion system (said before). 1drv.ms/ZdJalh