Part 1 - Pushover Analysis of Buildings [Conventional First Mode based Nonlinear Static Procedures]

This is the first part of a lecture session on the pushover analysis procedures for the performance assessment of building structures. This Part 1 covers the conventional first mode based nonlinear static analysis procedures including the following.
a) The Capacity Spectrum Method (ATC 40, FEMA 356)
b) The Displacement Coefficient Method (ATC 40, FEMA 356)
c) The FEMA 440 Improved NSPs (FEMA 440, ASCE 41-06/13)
I hope that the discussion will be useful.
The pdf lecture file can be downloaded from the following links.
Link 1: www.dropbox.co...
Link 2: structurespro.i...

[@UnderstandingStructures]

The link to download the pdf file of the lecture is now added in the description.

[@CivilSoftwareTutorials]

Sir please make a video on Fragility curves What is the concept of fragility curve . We guys are waiting for long time

[@aiinvi]

Very Elaborate and Precise Presentation in simple logical and understandable way! Thank you Sir

[@passangdorjimoktan9180]

Thank you very much Mr. Fawad Najam, this video was very helpful in understanding the pushover analysis of building.

[@ravitejamartha7306]

Its simple to understand by the way you have had explained. I Request you make more videos, especially relating to tall buildings.

[@vemuricreativeworks7406]

excellent sir

[@Torq123]

amazing lecture..love from India

[@maryammontazeri8685]

Very useful and effective sir, thanks

[@takisapostolides412]

Sir, congratulations for the presentation, how the "Mode Shape Factor, Φ" is calculated, could you please explain in detail with a video?

[@ajazmemon455]

Sir Excellent presentation

[@hemilcivil3909]

Very nice explain sir....

[@amritregmi5034]

Thank You Professor...

[@shokryalqaisi5902]

Thank you very much 🌹

[@emjb3608]

Thank you dear sir very informative and fruit full clearing almost main doubts dear sir please also perform it on etabs or sap for more understanding if possible.

[@emjb3608]

Dear sir , is the concept of Response reduction factor or Response modification factor is originated from it which you explain in capacity spectrum method to modify spectrum for performance point and u explain the reason to convert NL model to Equivalent linear model. Dear sir please explain if possible does R factor and CSM to modify spectrum for performance point have same concept with different mechanics or they are entirely different phenomenas . I wish to hear from u dear sir.

[@dhirenderbisht4956]

great help .. thanks a lot

[@nananggunawan491]

thank you very much Sir,

[@shafiullah2140]

Thank you sir for these vedios

[@Follow_thru]

Thank you

[@TheRegish]

Sir, how to create bilinearisation PO curve from PO curve obtained from Etabs?

[@hariomchandra9048]

What is effective damping or damping in structure .how it effect a building structure ?

[@gowow3466]

How to calculate target displacement?

[@vefaokumus]

Sir, do you have any material about estimating the target displacement using the NLRHA of the equivalent SDF system? Looks very interesting and applicable using simple computer codes.

[@amit95gupta]

Thanks sir

[@izzettinalhalil7168]

Thanks a lot, is there any further parts for pushover analysis such as example with sap2000 or etabs?

[@chiragjain8027]

Can you please upload a video solving a simple frame using the above approaches using Etabs or Perform 3d software..It will be helpful and will clear all the doubt.

[@UnderstandingStructures]

Yes it is in my plan. Hopefully very soon.

[@chiragjain8027]

@@UnderstandingStructures Thanks will wait.

[@narynderkumar5273]

@@chiragjain8027 ??

[@emjb3608]

Dear sir , is the concept of Response reduction factor or Response modification factor is originated from it which you explain in capacity spectrum method to modify spectrum for performance point and u explain the reason to convert NL model to Equivalent linear model. Dear sir please explain if possible does R factor and CSM to modify spectrum for performance point have same concept with different mechanics or they are entirely different phenomenas . I wish to hear from u dear sir.

[@UnderstandingStructures]

No these two concepts are different. The reduction of response spectrum in CSM is to account for the additional hysteretic damping which is produced as a result of inelastic action. The R factor (in ELF and RSA procedures) accounts for the ductility and overstrength of structure i. e we just reduce the design forces while relying on the ductility and overstrength of the structure. Please check the lecture on Inelastic Reaponse Spectrum in my dynamics playlist for the origins of R factor.

[@emjb3608]

JazakAllah dear sir . Means alot dear sir.

[@henryviabonitalla530]

how many times he said "basically"?

[@shokryalqaisi5902]

Can we get a slides?

[@hariomchandra9048]

Sir can i get a pdf of ur presentation .

[@UnderstandingStructures]

The link to download the pdf file of the lecture is now added in the description.

[@falhanykusuma_st5537]

Tutor etabs kzbin.info/www/bejne/jGLKmWiobd6HpLM

[@hamzahalsabahie1552]

Thanks But I hope you improve your accent