Patek must have taken (some) inspiration from the Seiko Superior SKZ035J and 037J Whirlpool dial, 1996 and 2001. 😉🤫
@-Medici2 ай бұрын
@@BrittPearceWatches I **MAEN!** It's not wrong. There, i corrected that for You 😅
@leoanthony72812 ай бұрын
This is the Ali Express version of Cartier.
@BrianNovak-gk5rb2 ай бұрын
I like how you say Patek Phillipe release... "This". Lol
@liquid_metal2 ай бұрын
The Pubitus - it's complete balls.
@behonestwithyourself37182 ай бұрын
Haha, I was trying to make that joke make sense before posting it. You nailed it my friend.
@jamesblonde22712 ай бұрын
😂
@dmoneydmoney60502 ай бұрын
Got eeeemm
@leoanthony72812 ай бұрын
@@liquid_metal 🤣😂🤣
@BrittPearceWatches2 ай бұрын
The perfect comment doesnt exi…..
@jameskwon76172 ай бұрын
It's GIGANTIC on both your wrists.
@GEMSofGOD_com2 ай бұрын
It is, across all shots. I've never ever seen an uglier watch, ever, EVER, and I repeat, ever.
@FightingMango2 ай бұрын
Store: ”Please don’t use the camera that would make it look any good. Marketing would be upset. The president and down all just want everyone to get annoyed with Patek”
@BrittPearceWatches2 ай бұрын
I really didn't know why I couldn't use my proper camera lol! I just wanted to make it look good!!!
@jamesblonde22712 ай бұрын
@@BrittPearceWatchesmaybe picture it next to a 11.59?
@balazskertesz50102 ай бұрын
@@jamesblonde2271 the 11.59 is a hundred times better.
@ardoin_3372 ай бұрын
@@sys-administratorand yet here we are lol
@thelifeofjools83842 ай бұрын
Awwww shucks....and there's me, along with millions of other consumers, who bought into the lie that phone cameras weren't dogsh*t. :)
@LasersMcNichill2 ай бұрын
It's a beautiful Cartier Santos homage
@BrittPearceWatches2 ай бұрын
You know! The more I see it, the more it does seem Santos-ish! (But I quite like the santos! So that probably explains why I like this! 🤔)
@joewhite68752 ай бұрын
Correction: it’s a HIDEOUS Cartier santos homage
@Swindx2 ай бұрын
Correction: Its a ugly cartier santos homage :)
@jcmuscle1232 ай бұрын
PP design team : everyone is wearing that Apple Watch square thing right ?
@montys8th2 ай бұрын
Finally, someone else who gets it.
@drnick402 ай бұрын
Very true. It is “Apple Watch squarish” among other things…
@peterholzapfel69122 ай бұрын
Looks like a MIDO Multifort TV. Just shows what a great brand MIDO really is 😊
@chateaubullion25602 ай бұрын
I do own a Mido Multifort TV Big Date and I love it. I'm getting older and it's great being able to see the big date without straining my eyes and yes, it does look a little bit like Patek especially with the rubber strap.
@borassictime9182 ай бұрын
The MIDO is a better, more considered, design. Who’d have thought!
@montys8th2 ай бұрын
Mido released the Multifort TV initially in 1973, a full three years before the Gerald Genta designed Nautilus was released in 1976. The Patek is the homage in this case.
@pac1fic0552 ай бұрын
Mido is a great brand.
@Swindx2 ай бұрын
@@montys8th well, than cubitus is a triple hommage :)
@DollarDude2 ай бұрын
That quote from Thierry Stern is a whole new level of out of touch elitism. What an insane quote from the president of a company that, by its own admission, wants to attract newer, younger clients to the brand.
@alexp37522 ай бұрын
Born with a platinum spoon in his mouth...
@kitxxxxkit2 ай бұрын
Patek is the very definition of elitism, even the younger clients they supposedly want to attract will be the ultra rich, you can think it's out of touch all you want, fact is the super rich are still going to continue to buy their watches, including this one. It is going to have ZERO impact on PP.
@CoitodococoonАй бұрын
😂😂😂 Did you think one second before done this comment? 😂😂😂
@るーさん-j1l2 ай бұрын
Once again, Cubitus made me realize how remarkable the design of the Nautilus truly is.
@user-eq5ub5rs3g2 ай бұрын
The “Cubitus” engraving on the buckle has very strong AliExpress vibes
@EdwardHTilley2 ай бұрын
I just saw that, it’s really bad isn’t it!
@davidhunternyc1Ай бұрын
_"If you don't like the Cubitus, you can't afford a Patek Philippe."_ - Thierry Stern, Patek Philippe
@iFyvie2 ай бұрын
I appreciate that you actually went and put them on.
@scottlalonde28782 ай бұрын
Another great video, thank you, Brittany 🙂👍. When I first saw the quote from Mr. Stern, I interpreted it as "There's people who just don't like Patek and will hate whatever we put out, so why worry about them." I'm sure I'm 100% incorrect, though. To that, Mr. Stern should remember that in order to have objects of envy, there must be us peons to envy them. And this peon would opt for the VC Overseas.
@mohammadpirzadah6382 ай бұрын
You are the best. Appreciate your honesty and candid videos. I agree. I have requested the Platinum. Agree that there is a lot of empty space in the other two models. I tried on the platinum and it was very different and stunning.
@jamesblonde22712 ай бұрын
@@mohammadpirzadah638 You've ordered one? Thats bold, well done mate if you like it & you can afford it rock on.
@abhaig2 ай бұрын
Great video Britt - as always fresh, authentic and a thoughtful perspective. Watches do take some time to “grow on you” - I did not think much about nautilus at first, but after getting one, it’s incredible! We need to give this some time and then see, say 12 months from now - but this is no “entry” Model - it’s a whole new line that will continue to grow
@speedracer2please2 ай бұрын
Some watches really are so different in person, and I haven't seen one in person, so I defer to you! This is really making me crave a Mido TV Bid Date or Maen though, when I hadn't really considered square sports watches before
@joecoollc1012 ай бұрын
If this was not PP no one would care I think…
@watchpapi2 ай бұрын
PP* ?
@joecoollc1012 ай бұрын
@@watchpapiyes xD
@watchpapi2 ай бұрын
@ 👍🏽👍🏽
@simonmackenzie42272 ай бұрын
So true
@videogamesare12 ай бұрын
Totally agree
@dasc0yne2 ай бұрын
I will probably never own a Patek, but Stern's comment just makes him seem thin-skinned about criticism. Criticism wouldn't shake a company with complete faith in their vision. Stern just comes across as butthurt and petty.
@markthomas741Ай бұрын
Surely, like everyone else Patek simply should have done a 70's retro reissue, or maybe they sorta have!
@aarnimallinen82642 ай бұрын
Great video! I love drinking a coffee and watching these videos :D
@ztunelover2 ай бұрын
The Pateks that intrigue me are their high horology works. Their sports watches are nice but I can’t justify that price
@robcarrier19692 ай бұрын
Perhaps if the watch world had a strong independent media that was prepared to tell the companies what they really thought instead of simply blowing smoke up their asses the whole time no matter what they do.... well that would be a start, eh?
@NerlyBellas2 ай бұрын
MAMACOO Stunning watches stunning video you are special i love it keep it up
@DukeDurrango2 ай бұрын
I saw one recently at the boutique in Miami. Wasn’t nearly as jarring as I thought it would be, in person. I didn’t handle it but it looked pretty awesome.
@Wu.Tang.Financial2 ай бұрын
It’s too big. I agree it looks off on the bracelet. It’s not the shape, it’s the proportions. I just can’t imagine paying 40k or more at retail for a NOTilus. The angular design and polished surfaces make it more loud than the nautilus and the added size doesn’t do it any favors here. At least when AP makes tacky stuff there’s a sense of silliness and play, this just feels like an insult to everyone who wanted a nautilus but couldn’t get one at retail
@RichardKoppinger2 ай бұрын
Even on James, it looks almost Invicta sized. I don't have any strong feelings about it, but I think you're definitely right that the three handers could benefit from a reduction in size.
@nejc32 ай бұрын
thank you for your goofy personality, can make one's day
@fredstahl28232 ай бұрын
30m water resistance? This is nobody's sportswatch at any age or price. Whoever mentioned Mido is spot on!
@garshkilla2 ай бұрын
Patek changed all models to reflect 30m water resistance, to include the nautilus. For Patek, 30m actually means you can dive and swim to a depth of 30m, not just splash resistant
@WoutervanWilligen2 ай бұрын
Let us remember the fab job Nomos did with 31 colors. 🎉🎉 PP might want to contact a certain mr. Braun in Berlin. 😅
@estradaarmory2 ай бұрын
It's a fair review. I think this watch in 36mm would be the way to go. 45mm is just too big and looks like "all hat no cattle" to me.
@chris_f_eden2 ай бұрын
Wearing my Maen Manhattan 39 green dial as I watch this wondering is this thing really 30X better than my watch 😂
@BrittPearceWatches2 ай бұрын
Ahhh the ORIGINAL! ;) Patek is just making homages! ;)
@seattlegrrlie2 ай бұрын
It's not, you've got the better choice 👍
@eu74352 ай бұрын
Your Maen is better proportioned and looks more wearable than the P.P.
@johnpeterson69462 ай бұрын
It actually looks great on you and your husband. After trying it on, I really love the fit and design. Really looked great. But, I was short $31,000.
@ericspeltier2 ай бұрын
Ah, Thierry, the bubble you live in will not always be so protective.
@nottherealaaron2 ай бұрын
I love Patek's Benjamin James Scarifour homage.
@conzmoleman2 ай бұрын
lol exactly
@wristopia41012 ай бұрын
He should not have said it but it was 100% true ✊ Patek and Rolex have never been closer lol.
@bsodmike2 ай бұрын
Great episode and thanks for the coverage of what they look like in the flesh. I’ve been collecting PP fora while and while I’m not in the market for a new PP, I’m still enjoying my current 5170g Chrono. Let’s see what this collection is like once the dust settles; and you’re totally right about the bracelet vs the strap. Thanks for pointing that out. I’ve never been into square watches, may have at somepoint considered a Reverso, but this just still feels too wide. If they had gone for a derivative rectangle so that it’s less wide, that would compensate for the Nautilus “flanges”. But making it so wide, still feels a bit off.
@richardmorris70632 ай бұрын
I seen a gold one w/ brown strap on someone wrist the other day, I was kind of smitten. I ordered the Seiko homage version the Seikonaut. Maybe someday ill get the real deal!
@Henrico112 ай бұрын
As a bit of a control freak, I'd really miss the power reserve dial from the 5712/1A. I wish they included it on the Cubitus.
@k2raf2 ай бұрын
Will it be possible to cover Montblanc please ? There is very little on it and I saw the Iced Sea in boutique this weekend, which was very interesting.
@odedroesler2 ай бұрын
How can you love the layout with the logo on the side like that??
@watchenthusiastlondon2 ай бұрын
Yep. I described feeling overwhelmed with indifference…
Reduce its size to 38-40mm (square watches where larger than round ones anyway) give it a new square shaped micro-rotor movement to match (like JLC do with the Reverso) and change the bracelet design slightly. And it’ll be a lot nicer I think 🤷♂️
@stevesmith79972 ай бұрын
Excellent Britt ! Think you are spot on a 38-40 steel model would have better proportions it will sell despite the initial hate!
@Pilot_air_on2 ай бұрын
Not that I could buy one, but I like it. It may be derivative but it’s neat
@Rashbains888Ай бұрын
I’m one of the rare folk in the watch world who has liked the Cubitus from initial launch
@chekim22 ай бұрын
I can see myself wearing the two tones model, that is, if money rains on me tomorrow. To go from the Nautilus to the Cubitus shouldn't have taken 25 years, even Tim Cook's Apple can churn this out once a year and call it "the greatest *** ever made". Rounded square, cube, rectangular, oval, circular, spherical, diamond, triangle, pyramid, bring them on, Patek!
@TrumanBurbankFE2 ай бұрын
Is your hubby on the list? It reminds me of the Cartier Square model, now discontinued.
@watchpapi2 ай бұрын
No, not a fan. The platinum was the best of the bunch but there’s many other Patek models I’d go for ahead of that.
@TrumanBurbankFE2 ай бұрын
My favorite in my budget is the 6119-G. I thought they were too lazy not making a square movement with a micro-rotor. LUC Alpine Eagle w Poinçon de Geneve, i want more.
@watchpapi2 ай бұрын
@ I like the 6119 looks and was offered one, but they wear really big. Agreed, should’ve developed a movement to fit the case properly.
@angikarchmer56332 ай бұрын
It may be a derivative design of the Nautilus as you mentioned, but the Nautilus is a very attractive design, The case construction such as the ears, as well as the finishing have been maintained. It's very nice looking overall, not that I could get one.
@Helmspete79612 ай бұрын
@Britt Peace Maybe a show about Breguet and especially some of their new open dial (Skeleton) watches.😊
@darrenroberts90362 ай бұрын
Can’t believe you went all Randy Savage, “the cream will rise to the top” … almost had my Coke Zero spurting out of my nostrils … 😂 #OooohYeah
@RAJohnson7132 ай бұрын
What does the diamond do?
@watchpapi2 ай бұрын
Signifies platinum.
@AlbertusMagnus_442 ай бұрын
Stern is correct. I don’t have a Patek Phillipe and I never will. By choice (in addition to by finances. 😎) I don’t see anything here that would make me want to sell my Omega for a down payment on this. (TBT, I could write a check, but no thanks.) It’s OK, but the cost is commensurate only with the brand name, not this watch. Lastly, I can’t imagine life NOT being a Pope-Tier Patron. Part of the fun is having different opinions and tastes and seeing where there may be confluence. Not to gush, but this is by far the best watch channel on YT and videos like this are why. 😎⌚️🍾🍾🍾
@hamhead86502 ай бұрын
The watch is beautiful in the flesh
@Gordon-lv4iyАй бұрын
The Manhattan 37 looks significantly better, particularly with the Genève stripes on the dial.
@jondraper32802 ай бұрын
This can be bought on Ali express right ?
@אלכסס-ח5ג2 ай бұрын
Even Ali express don't make something that ugly.
@seetcheryang21422 ай бұрын
Love your unbiased yet polite / thoughtful comments GRINGA.
@jaydub95092 ай бұрын
Thanks for the hands on Britt! Don't hate them, definitely don't love them. The platinum comes closest to a watch I'd typically like, but it's too large and the subdial positioning seems awkward. If I was to invest that much in a watch (not happening) I'd buy a Lange 1.
@erichaagen65062 ай бұрын
I love your videos. You have a warm and sort of fresh way to show and share your watch enthusiasm. Keep doing it the same way!!!! I believe that all the „haters“ of the Cubitus would directly take one of they would have the chance. If they would have the money to afford it or will receive it as a gift or whatever, no one would say „no“. Of course all the new things and ideas are in the first place „never as good as the current/ old ones“. But in time the Cubitus will find it‘s place. And like all Pateks it will be loved. Patek had almost no chance to satisfy everyone when creating something new. If the would have released something almost identical to the Nautilus‘ style, then everyone would have „hated“ then for being to boring or not brave enough. I like the Cubitus
@joggle43212 ай бұрын
^This looks like Fisher Price: My first Patek.
@k.iskandar2 ай бұрын
Ive said the same thing on Adrian Barker's channel. I actually don't find Cubitus ugly. I just find it very lazy and lacking soul. I think they should get rid of the Nautilus style bracelet and instead replace it with their Patek Phillippe 70s style mesh bracelet (think of ref 35711 or the Ellipse with ref 3634/2G). But the attitude from Thierry Stern surrounding the feedback from the watch community is absolutely foul and distasteful.
@BrittPearceWatches2 ай бұрын
Lol! I think everyone can skip this video, and just read this comment!
@nabilshaikh77002 ай бұрын
Red shoes looked better than watch ❤
@drnick402 ай бұрын
Britt, why for some reason I don’t see myself drooling over this watch? Patek makes many watches worth buying and coveting. Just not this one. But that’s my own opinion. Thank you very much. I always enjoy your videos.
@richardmorris70632 ай бұрын
That dial is nice, also like the shine on it.
@x838nwy2 ай бұрын
2:41 yup saw them irl and the two-tone is the only I liked. The pt looks like I need to shake it an few times to get everything to line up right. They have so much space there why do they arrange the dials like that?
@yavin992 ай бұрын
I don't own a Patek and I'm not sure that I ever will but I don't hate this watch and I would definitely wear it.
@YoRHa_2E2 ай бұрын
I feel like the two-tone looks better than the stainless steel model because the watches are so chunky. The additional colour for the case helps to visually break it up a bit. At least that's how I see it, I wouldn't actually buy any of the three even if I could. Stern's comments are kinda blunt, there's probably a better way he could've made his point that wouldn't have ticked off so many people.
@MosnaRawr2 ай бұрын
I'd never spend $45k USD on a stainless steel anything.That money opens up doors to precious metal pieces on bracelets from most brands.
@nusbacher2 ай бұрын
I want to know how much PP paid their branding consultant for 'Cubitus'. Also, YT has served me one of your videos for the first time in at least a year! 🎉
@66racer2 ай бұрын
Often times enthusiast or critics will hate on something but the intended clients will love it, just the way it is. It is worth it if it makes the buyer feel good. I kinda felt that way when getting my Accutron DNA and am now doing the same as I consider a Casio MRG-B5000 watch. What watch over $1000 is a financially good decision without a wait list? Buy what you love and who cares if it is worth it or not as long as your finances are in order.
@underachievingwatchcollect18782 ай бұрын
Theirry Stern is like Austin Powers after being unfrozen-no inner monologue 💀💀💀!!
@jsusna19722 ай бұрын
What I don't get about the design are the weird-looking add-on bits to the side of the case. It might look fine if it were simply an actual square or rectangle, ala Cartier, but what purpose is served by the extra addition of the pieces on the side? Surely, they can't contain any portion of the movement. As to Thierry's statement, I guess he'll have his answer when the people who can afford a Patek don't buy them. That's just my guess. Does Patek release sales information on each model?
@CESONER2 ай бұрын
I’ve gone from kind of liking it to absolutely loving it. Especially the blue platinum. I think it’s exceptional and it is a continuation of the Patek design language. It has taken things in a rather unique and unexpected direction, but I am open-minded about design and that micro rotor has got me! Thank you for another great video Britt.
@Jeffelangelo2 ай бұрын
The Cubitus is cool and all, but are we going to talk about the fact that Swatch just released the best Moonswatch of them all? 😂
@masoncusack2 ай бұрын
What purpose does the diamond in the bottom serve?
@watchpapi2 ай бұрын
Signify the case is platinum.
@nathanragovan63292 ай бұрын
.... this is the first new range in 25yrs, if you're holding out/wishing for something better give it another 25yrs...this will grow on everyone and will most likely set the pace for the rest to follow... lest we forget, this is after all a Patek
@dr.kevinmoore88892 ай бұрын
The Cubitis looks way better to me than the Nautilus. I don't think I'd wear a nautilus but I would definitely wear incubus. The two-tone or the complicated one are really good-looking watches. I think they priced it that way so that the people that are going to buy it can differentiate themselves from those who buy the overseas or the royal oak. That sort of thing matters to a lot of people. Stern's statement is refreshing on one hand, but honestly it shows a lack of judgment in my opinion and that's the kind of thing that makes you wonder about his leadership and his decision-making. He could have essentially said the same thing without being so insulting about it.
@chateaubullion25602 ай бұрын
Every time I see this Cubitus, it reminds me of Santos de Cartier. Is that a good thing or bad thing?
@richardbartlett69322 ай бұрын
It's a you need to see an optician thing. They are both sq that's literally it..
@WatchYourselfJorge2 ай бұрын
yeah the Stern comments... oof... as always brilliant and well balanced video! interesting to hear your thoughts having had a cubitus on the wrist.
@GarethDix2 ай бұрын
It’s one of those rare watches that looks even worse than the marketing photos
@hktc4122 ай бұрын
Cubitus has no surprise, I would rather choose Santos de Cartier! 😂😂😂
@garshkilla2 ай бұрын
I think Thierry Stern is totally correct in his assessment, although it’s hard to stomach. His comments only reinforce the exclusivity of the brand, and make those who own a Patek Philippe feel even more special. The angry comments directed at Stern remind me of comments made on an instagram models page. “I’ll never have her, so I may as well convince myself to hate her.”
@gid-vicious2 ай бұрын
I like the green color choice. Maybe slightly smaller at 42mm would make it more attractive? Price way too high
@Konsaliki2 ай бұрын
I don't know what it is exactly, but the more I look at the Cubitus, the more it looks like a fake Patek. As if some scammer redrew the Nautilus from memory and went with it. Even the dial looks unbalanced with the logo being too small and... ugh... I won't warm up to it.
@maxinahunt86522 ай бұрын
Thanks for the genuine review. Honestly even if I won the lottery I wouldn’t buy this one or the nautilus….. Too blocky.
@robynsjp2 ай бұрын
Actually it would look great with rounded corners and somewhat smaller.
@dons76222 ай бұрын
Oh, there must be some other interpretation of Mr. Sterns comments. Nah.... When I decided to buy a "grail" I struggled between Patek and Breguet. Feel good about my choice now! Your comments on the art, history, fashion and engineering are brilliant.
@Hrethgir2 ай бұрын
You like the platinum one best? That's the worst of the bunch, those subdials being different sizes and not centered and symmetrical just looks horrible to me.
@alexp37522 ай бұрын
Well said.
@DrJake1082 ай бұрын
When it first came out I kinda liked it However the more I’ve seen it and see the size and their terrible marketing - I really don’t like it If I want a square watch with some history I’ll get the Cartier for fractions of the price And when they say entry level - it should sit below the Aquanaut and have a price similar to the fiftysix from Vacheron- under 20k.
@addyrizalhashim85282 ай бұрын
My answer is i hated it more after the CEO statement.
@714milky5 күн бұрын
As a person that can neither afford this or the nautilus....i don't hate it. Lol
@mahmoudghoneim80042 ай бұрын
Please to you tubers we love and trust don't try to sugar coat the fact that it's an un cohesive to be polite and to not be called hater , one flaw as you rightly noticed the width of the bracelet doesn't work with the head and that's something you cannot oversee.
@johndavid87532 ай бұрын
Hey, did you ever get your 36 mm Rolex Celebration dial? Great video, platinum is nice but the shape is still um, off-putting. 🤷
@wristopia41012 ай бұрын
Squarer, nor square. The Nautilus is already pretty square which is why I find the hate odd. I do not like the Nautilus so kind of prefer this even though I do not like square watches. Round movement in a square case is weird though.
@neftorres2 ай бұрын
Maen is a nice watch.
@robin2thek2 ай бұрын
I like the platinum one with the strap.
@dunderhay91692 ай бұрын
Interesting to see pictures on wrist 👍 As we all suspected, it wears huge! I would say make it smaller, but if they did, a Santos woud still look a lot better. Of course my opinion doesn't matter.....
@alunjones25502 ай бұрын
I think the Maen Manhattan looks far better, albeit at a slightly different price point.
@gavinwhite97432 ай бұрын
‘Just blabbing now’ the best ending to a video ever! 😂😂 This watch was never aimed at me, so if you have the money and like it good luck! Not liking it makes it an easy pass…but I bet plenty of muggles will wander in, and buy it.