Paul McCartney VS. Billy Shears: Performances of Yesterday

[@raulvega4016]

Jesus, look at his hair! Look at the difference, McCartney's was shorter!

[@agitatedmongoose]

Bahahhhhaaa. *stop mucking around in these tinfoil hat sites that prey on the easily fooled (who actually can't think for themselves) but convince them that they are the "critical thinkers" and that the rest of the unthinking sheep. Going into these sites is not doing research. Lol.* *With their naturally everyday occurrence yet handpicked forced perspective photos as proof as "Faul" as being taller and their out of context videos forcing you to believe you are seeing and hearing things that are not there.* *As an example I was on the Justice forJames website where she presented Paul's Stage IEM as a prosthetic ear. Lol. I have firsthand knowledge she is a scammer. Yes, she.* *Or on Michael Williams' Sage Of Quay he did an "investigation" where he proved there was no way they could write and arrange and record the Rubber Soul album from October 12th to November 15th 1965.* *But what he conveniently forgot to mention was that they came in dry into the October recordings only after their June 1965 recordings were already completed.* *Which proves to me he's a scammer as he chose to leave that very well known fact out as he knew you all just get your facts from these scamming sites with no citations.* ==== *My favorite sheep-like comment is when people say James looks genetically like his father Vivian Stanshall. Bahahaha.* *That doesn't even make any sense. How can James genetically look like a disguise"?* *Because according to your own theories that is actually what "Faul" and Vivian are. Disguises. Faul with his plastic surgeries and Latex and Vivian with blonde wigs and Hollywood prosthetics.* ***As according to your own logistically impossible fantasies 'William" is supposed to most resemble his first character Phil Avrill, lol (even having to say "his first character" lowered my IQ by 50 points).**** *James at 20 looked exactly like 1963 Paul with his his droopy eyes and distinctive arch in his eyelid area, raised eyebrows and exact chin. And had his mother's strawberry blonde hair and light features, not from Vivian (and your 70s Street Vivian had nothing to do with Linda either). Same with Stella. Dark haired Mary has the distinctive eyelid arch line too. And now as an older man James is a doppelganger to his uncle Michael.* *Thr logistics of what you're proposing is straight out of the mind of 13 year old adolescent child. Yes the world is corrupt and money hungry but it isn't as organized as you think it is.* *Any conspiracy that needs multiple doubles is a very weak conspiracy indeed.* ======== *****Paul still has his lip scar from his December 26th 1965 moped accident**** *Which has naturally changed over a lifetime like it should. Placing a scar on Paul's lip by a plastic surgeon is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. They would have had to rip Faul's lip open deep completely in 1966 to make it so it can last and change over a lifetime (which it did). We know this didn't happen as we all would've noticed it at the time that his lip was ripped open fresh again like it was in 1965 the year before.* ***Paul bought the Scotland farm on June 7th, 1966*** ***Paul's penchant for what John called Granny music stayed consistent before and after 1966 right through to the late 70s at times. Which was due to his father's music hall influences. With Paul surprising him with his dad's only song in the 70s (which his dad lied about).* *Paul's dad was at his 1969 wedding with many many many pictures of them genuinely laughing together in the 70s.* *Paul and Michael going off together for lunch way in the background not even knowing they were in the shot in Get Back.* *Etc.* *Do you really believe that the Beatles and all their Hollywood friends and British wives would be stupid enough to call him Billy to his face pretty much every time a camera is around (mostlydry British humor) ? The Beatles and their opportunistic record company have been exploiting this 60s teenage college campus fantasy almost from the get-go. Not even to mention he used to book himself into hotels as Billy Martin in the early days as well.* ===== *The whole foundation of the Tavistock conspricay was built upon fraud and deception.* *I can prove it to you by providing you a look into you how every single paragraph of the original book that started the whole conspiracy was copied and pasted from other books. Every single line. And I can provide you the original books as to where they all came from. But here's the kicker. Nothing in this book is credited to the original person who said it. Of which none of it had anything to with Tavistock. The citations were all made up to fit a made up scenario of a Tavistock conspiracy. Completely made up. This is not an opinion that it is not real. It's a fact. And I can prove it to you.* ***I can send that over to you if you like**** *All Faulers seem to be missing the nuance gene. You think you have an insight into how this world really works. I'll let you in on another little secret. You don't.* *if you reply TLDR I'll give you my bored yawn now".

[@1bassman9]

I'm not convinced either way but I will say the early performances of Paul McCartney were played with incredible confidence and he never looked down in his guitar and I don't find that same confidence in later performances

[@lauramartin-bk9nr]

I don´t know if in fact there are 2 persons or 1, but to me the 1st Yesterday in the above video sounds corny. The 2nd Yesterday (the original, the earlier Yesterday) is magical.

[@nikkocy]

Paul’s face was more kind. the kindness you can not mimic.

[@marileelockwood5408]

@@nikkocy A very lovely comment. 💖✨🌸

[@ЛеКи-б7п]

Да.В глазах доброта.

Tina Foster's book sealed James Paul McCartney's casket for me. Yes Billy did an outstanding job, but they are two different people.

[@randalclarke5487]

Oh please...she's an idiot. I'm a huge conspiracy person, but sorry, this dog won't hunt

[@TimWrightt]

the difference: paul sings like the words actually mean something to him

[@erikdirks]

Thank you so much for this! If they can replace a rock star and deceive the public, they can do the same to a President, a Prime Minister, Congressman, Senator, etc.

[@zzmey1988]

and they did it with Putin, eltsin and etc.

[@grahamherbert3612]

I was 12 in 76, and I remember my Dad telling me about Shears. My Father had seen both Paul and Shears play live many times, and was a very proficient left handed player himself. He found it almost unbelievable, that more people hadn't identified the differences in playing style, proficiency, and, to him, clear vocal, and body language disparities.

[@f6was9]

I play bass and that’s a bunch of crap. Any bass player worth a shit will tell you that’s Paul. Unbelievable what people can talk themselves into believing. Smdh

[@eddieramirez8970]

#1 No disrespect to your father, but he was wrong. #2 When a person plays the guitar as often as Paul does, he learned different ways of playing the guitar, as well as any other instruments that he played. Think of it this way, when you were in Grammer school, did you write, or talk the exact same way you do now? Of course not,! Your vocabulary Improved as well as your penmanship! Some people are just so Jealous of Paul's Rich Talent, that every chance they get, they try to knock him down!

[@ruelitocayamanda8162]

And your father believes that the earth is flat.

[@ruelitocayamanda8162]

Ok let's settle this. Why would the rest of the Beatles let a look alike stand in and get the credit and royalties for Paul's songs? How in the world would a look alike and sound alike be able to create hits after hits like the real Paul? Watch the movie docu Let It Be. If that is not Paul, wouldn't George just tell the fake Paul to stuff it when he got pissed off? Why would tolerate him if he wasn't the real Paul? Remember, both George and John wanted out of the Beatles. No sense in joining a conspiracy to prolong the agony.

[@garyenwards1608]

Your father was correct. These people are sleeping. Many of us see past the illusions kzbin.info/www/bejne/gV6WlpV-a7iDbsk

[@canopyfields]

Billy didn't go to Paul's father's funeral. And has no communication with Paul's sister.

[@eisnotanumber3557]

People change a lot in ten years, and also Ringo said in the song "I'm The Greatest" that he is Billy Shears. Also, that part going into "With a little Help From My Friends" the band say "Billy Shears" and then after that Ringo starts singing.

[@josephthunderhorse8793]

Most of the obvious inserts to the songs were intentionally placed to bolster the conspiracy theory....did John Lennon strike you as shy?....if he wanted to tell you that "Paul was dead"...he wouldn't do it with hints in backward playing lyrics...he would say "me best bloke is dead" ...it was probably Paul and Brian's idea

[@Nitrotoast1]

@@josephthunderhorse8793 yeah exactly, John got murdered because he spoke up against the war as well as injustice in our world. Why do people think he’d stay silent on a massive cover up conspiracy against an imposter he allegedly hated?

[@LaMYsteriosa87]

Not the shape or the size of the skull. Not ears, their size or the way they are angled. Nor height after 24. Or 1,5 larger shoe size. Give me a break.

[@NickNack-l4q]

Yes, indeed. It was Ringo's chosen name for the fictional band Sgt Pepper. Shears is a fictional character connected to Ringo, and has nothing to do with Paul.

[@joelhenderson5404]

Billy has a artificial right eye to and has to look down to see if he is in the right place on the neck. RIP Paul.

[@RickiKeith]

Coming from a professional singer and vocal coach, I can hear the VERY distinct differences in the two performances notably tone and the different approaches to each note. The first performer "dips" into some of the notes whereas the second performer never does. The first performer has a clearly different vocal cabinet that has a more rigid quality and his pulling his head back like he does also "squeezes" the sound to lend a similar tonal quality as the second performer, but it fails. Every well know singers voice has a signature sound like a fingerprint that to the untrained ear may not blatantly detectable, but to another singer and vocal coach, the differences are very obvious. The 8 years or so between the performances would not present this much change in tone, timbre and style. I say it is two different singers.

[@robertzafaras4462]

ricki, totally agree

[@matrixseeker7911]

I also agree with your assessment. The real Paul's voice has a beautiful warmth and fullness to it, which is not captured by the replacement.

[@robertzafaras4462]

@matrixseeker7911 , matrix 100% correct. Paul's demeanor totally different than billy. Billy good musician, but paul had such a kindness, likeable, just at ease. We never did get to mourn Paul's death. His ending I fear was much more nefarious than most even consider. I've been a life long Beatle fan since February 1964. Still I enjoy them. My youth, I remember. All the singles I bought at the record store. I'm thinking they were $0.89. Albums $6.00 ,

[@matrixseeker7911]

@@robertzafaras4462 I agree that Billy was a good musician and singer. He could fill in for Paul for never truly replace him. You can see the true love that John had for Paul in some of the early videos, and the whole group as a whole seemed to be very happy. After Billy stepped in, it seemed that a lot of the magic had disappeared. I have so many questions about this situation. Who wrote the later songs sung by Billy that were attributed to "Paul"? What really happened to the original Paul? I wonder if the Beatles as a group would have lasted longer that they did if the original Paul was still there.

[@robertzafaras4462]

@@matrixseeker7911, matrix you ask good questions. If you haven't seen these: please check out. Mike Williams sage of quay. Mike really the authority. Painstakingly researched . And of course " memoirs " difficult to read. As I got mad at billy but good insight

[@johnrambo4245]

Fuckin hell Look at the difference in their teeth McCartney had straight teeth Billy had slightly bucked front teeth🤯

[@Rippaul1966]

Exactly. They aren’t the same dude.

[@thetruthfornow6045]

@@Rippaul1966 yet his replacement has no proof of existence. Birth certificate, school yearbook photos, drivers license records, traceable family or people who knew Billy before he became Paul. You make up a name. Yet that person never existed. I have no fame. Yet if I disappeared and was replaced, everybody would spot the difference. Paul has hairy arms. Faul has hairy arms. Voice DNA states the same person. Both have half circle eyebrows. Paul was 5 ft 10.5 inches. You tube lists the height of celebrities about 10 years ago. It listed current Paul at 5 ft 10.5 inches. A plastic surgeon looked at the current old looking Paul and stated that he never had plastic facial surgery.

[@RickB1792]

Cosmetic dentistry has bern around a long time

[@johnrambo4245]

@@RickB1792 So you think McCartney went and had his nice straight teeth cosmetically made crooked?

[@marcobaretta]

@@Rippaul1966 In the early sixties, Paul had a child with an Erika Hubers a woman in Germany. There child was called Bettina. For years Paul paid money to this woman and her child. Even though he claimed it was not his. In Germany on the woman's birth certificate it says Paul McCartney on the birth certificate to this day. It has never been removed. In 1984 in a DNA testing Paul( aka Faul) was found not to be the father. She then accused him of using someone else's DNA to hide the fact. Italian DNA specialist and experts invited Paul to have his DNA compared with that of the rest of his family. He then turned it down. Strange behaviour for a man who did no wrong. In the 1980s when he was arrested for possessing drugs in Japan. The Japanese authorities took his fingerprints. They then learnt that Paul(the real one) in the early sixties had been deported from Germany for having set a room on fire in Hamburg. They also learnt that the German authorities had Paul's(the real one) fingerprints on file. So they requested it from the Germans. The Germans send Paul's fingerprints to the Japanese authorities. The Japanese then took Paul's(Faul in this case) fingerprints and compared them. It was a MISMATCH . They then imprisoned Faul because they thought he was both an impostor and a lawbreaker. He spend days in jail after the British government was eventually able to obtain his release. There is your proof. His fingerprints did not match. Yes people change over years BUT FINGERPRINTS DO NOT. So different fingerprints mean different DNA and different DNA therefore means two DIFFERENT people. Also till this day he won't have his DNA compared with that of the rest of the McCartney family. So there is your proof. Also he was friends with Putin in the 2000s. So it is not beneath him to lie.

[@leonardblush2557]

If this is '76, Billy would be pushing 40. Whoever's voice it is, given all of the ciggies, drugs, booze, etc, it would naturally be shredded all to heck. Throw in 2.5 hour break free concerts, and it's something that he had what he had. I would disagree slightly about Paul vs Billy in the sense that the '67-69 singing may have been the best vocal period for the character publicly known as Paul. ('62-66 vocals were outstanding, too, if course.)

[@Rippaul1966]

I would say that his vocals were superb for both periods, however I think the real Paul had a slightly better voice. Agree to disagree on that.

[@mamadordetravecos9254]

Compare The Long and Winding Road in 1969 and 1976 at Rockshow, Paul sounds very different, do you mean he was switched in those years?

[@markzappasodi]

It's from 1975. Australia. That's the outfit he wore on that tour.

[@paolomontemurro2569]

Leonard Blush I agree with you ; they are two non-comparable performances .

[@RickB1792]

Sorry, same guy.

[@Alphabettv]

Hmm. Not sure I"m convinced of this. Yes, there are differences in quality. Firstly, I think this may be due to the sound quality of the films, between the 60s footage and the 70s footage. Secondly, as a musician myself, Paul maybe felt like taking a different approach in the 70s to his guitar playing rather than playing the original version note for note or strum for strum. Lots of musicians do this to avoid getting bored and stale with the material. Thirdly, it is well known that Macartney was a huge pot head, and this may have affected both the speed of which he played the song, as well as the quality of his voice, particularly if he had a huge spliff before going on stage. Finally, the camera angles are different. In the 70s footage, the camera is below so it looks like he is tilting his head very prominently, but he does similar movements in the 60s footage, where the camera angles are more even. Also he glances down at his guitar in both if you actually look carefully.

[@shadowclaw878]

it's almost as if there was over an entire decade between the performances

[@mycophobia]

there's just nothing you can say to deeply conspiratorially minded people, every little minor aspect of anything is proof positive for the thing they want to believe. idk why i keep looking at videos like this, like there's literally nothing you can say to the people this invested in it and it just drives me up a wall lol

[@marcobaretta]

@@mycophobia In the early sixties, Paul had a child with an Erika Hubers a woman in Germany. There child was called Bettina. For years Paul paid money to this woman and her child. Even though he claimed it was not his. In Germany on the woman's birth certificate it says Paul McCartney on the birth certificate to this day. It has never been removed. In 1984 in a DNA testing Paul( aka Faul) was found not to be the father. She then accused him of using someone else's DNA to hide the fact. Italian DNA specialist and experts invited Paul to have his DNA compared with that of the rest of his family. He then turned it down. Strange behaviour for a man who did no wrong. In the 1980s when he was arrested for possessing drugs in Japan. The Japanese authorities took his fingerprints. They then learnt that Paul(the real one) in the early sixties had been deported from Germany for having set a room on fire in Hamburg. They also learnt that the German authorities had Paul's(the real one) fingerprints on file. So they requested it from the Germans. The Germans send Paul's fingerprints to the Japanese authorities. The Japanese then took Paul's(Faul in this case) fingerprints and compared them. It was a MISMATCH . They then imprisoned Faul because they thought he was both an impostor and a lawbreaker. He spend days in jail after the British government was eventually able to obtain his release. There is your proof. His fingerprints did not match. Yes people change over years BUT FINGERPRINTS DO NOT. So different fingerprints mean different DNA and different DNA therefore means two DIFFERENT people. Also till this day he won't have his DNA compared with that of the rest of the McCartney family. So there is your proof. Also he was friends with Putin in the 2000s. So it is not beneath him to lie. Nothing conspiratorial about this. All well documented.

[@marcobaretta]

@@mycophobia In the 1970's Faul gets into to trouble in Scotland for growing marijuana. Claims that he is none the wiser. In 1980 Faul is arrested for possessing drugs in Japan. He still boasts about it today. In 1984 Faul is fined 200 Barbados dollars for possessing drugs in Barbados. In 2001 Faul is seen in multiple photos walking alongside Putin. The guy who is committing a genocide in Ukraine now. A well proven track record of criminality and controversy. Proof he is not beneath lying. Identity theft for a guy like this. No problem.

[@marcobaretta]

@@mycophobia In the 1970's Faul gets into to trouble in Scotland for growing marijuana. Claims that he is none the wiser. In 1980 Faul is arrested for possessing drugs in Japan. He still boasts about it today. In 1984 Faul is fined 200 Barbados dollars for possessing drugs in Barbados. In 2001 Faul is seen in multiple photos walking alongside Putin. The guy who is committing a genocide in Ukraine now. A well proven track record of criminality and controversy. Proof he is not beneath lying. Identity theft for a guy like this. No problem.

[@marcobaretta]

@@mycophobia In an interview with Ron Wood. Faul claims that he "became a member of the Beatles". Wow this guy does not even bother to study the life he has stolen. What really happened was that Paul(the real one) joined a band called the Quarry men after meeting John Lennon(both having gone to different and opposing schools). Later Paul introduced George Harrison to John Lennon who accepted him but reluctantly. Later they left and formed the Beatles. They went through a string of drummers until they settled on Ringo. Paul never joined the Beatles. He was A FOUNDING MEMBER. Faul on the other hand did join the Beatles in 1966. After Paul's death. And on another TV program he talks about joining the Beatles after they had already been set up. But again Paul(the real one) was a founding member and not one that joined. So real Paul = Founding member. Faul = A band that had already been formed for years. Documented FACTS. NOT conspiracy.

[@virginiadearguello979]

You are right!!Paul and fault are different

[@cannedratmeat]

Not only did Paul sing Beatles songs from the early 60s differently, but he also was experimenting with different sounds, especially in the 70s and 80s. It’s not hard to believe that he’d sing the same song he’s sung millions of times a little different each time. Every singer does this. It’s not uncommon. Paul sing song different = Must be dead Come on guys :/

[@garryleeks4848]

He’s still alive

[@garryleeks4848]

@ARKASH he didn’t have 6 toes 😂

[@garryleeks4848]

@ARKASH it started as a joke by some college kids , probably on to much ganga and it got out of hand

[@beatlebrian4404]

@ARKASH nobody called McCartney Billy!

[@beatlebrian4404]

@ARKASH well you tell me who called McCartney Billy and than I will answer you

[@Elvisultimatefanchannel]

Whenever I'm down(see what I did there?)and need a laugh I watch one of these videos or an ''Elvis faked his death'' one. They never fail to make me burst out laughing. Thanks for cheering me up 👍

[@marcobaretta]

In the early sixties, Paul had a child with an Erika Hubers a woman in Germany. There child was called Bettina. For years Paul paid money to this woman and her child. Even though he claimed it was not his. In Germany on the woman's birth certificate it says Paul McCartney on the birth certificate to this day. It has never been removed. In 1984 in a DNA testing Paul( aka Faul) was found not to be the father. She then accused him of using someone else's DNA to hide the fact. Italian DNA specialist and experts invited Paul to have his DNA compared with that of the rest of his family. He then turned it down. Strange behaviour for a man who did no wrong. In the 1980s when he was arrested for possessing drugs in Japan. The Japanese authorities took his fingerprints. They then learnt that Paul(the real one) in the early sixties had been deported from Germany for having set a room on fire in Hamburg. They also learnt that the German authorities had Paul's(the real one) fingerprints on file. So they requested it from the Germans. The Germans send Paul's fingerprints to the Japanese authorities. The Japanese then took Paul's(Faul in this case) fingerprints and compared them. It was a MISMATCH . They then imprisoned Faul because they thought he was both an impostor and a lawbreaker. He spend days in jail after the British government was eventually able to obtain his release. There is your proof. His fingerprints did not match. Yes people change over years BUT FINGERPRINTS DO NOT. So different fingerprints mean different DNA and different DNA therefore means two DIFFERENT people. Also till this day he won't have his DNA compared with that of the rest of the McCartney family. So there is your proof. Also he was friends with Putin in the 2000s. So it is not beneath him to lie. I do not know why you find this funny.

[@lotstodo]

Lol, I'm not going down this rabbit hole again.

[@СанжарНурдамир-о4у]

Absolutely the same man. And i say this like a professional musician and vocalist. In 76 Paul just changed a bit a vocal style of this song. There is only one and alive genuine Paul McCartney

[@mamadordetravecos9254]

exactly, he in 1976 sings The Long and Winding Road in Rockshow. Compare with 1969 that until then, they will think it's someone else

[@elizabethfonseca922]

According to the video, there's a 10 year gap between the two presentations. This is more than enough for a person's voice and manners to change, although I didn't notice anything relevant. This whole Paul is Dead hysteria is ridiculous. There's been one and only Paul McCartney, admit it.

[@MisterTMH]

Denial is a river in Egypt!.Billy is a clearly a differnet person but there is no one so blind as those who refuse to see. Wake up. It is easy to fool someone but very hard to convince anyone that they have been fooled. We don't get fooled again !

[@beatlebrian4404]

@@elizabethfonseca922 how can he admit it? If he does than that's the end of this stupid channel!

[@beatlebrian4404]

@@MisterTMH I will wake up, if you can explain this video. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZfOg3uDaJWUhdE

[@marcocarbajal9299]

The real Paul McCartney was a genius..

[@NickNack-l4q]

Yes he is.

[@robertlooper6764]

Yes he is.

[@OldSchoolVibes1978]

Yes he was

[@Neilious]

Billy shears wrote and played better stuff though if Paul was actually dead

[@BeatleBobby]

he did not die

[@SharkEatFish]

1. The voice: It's two different performances, do you really expect them to sound identical? No. Tbh, they sound practically the same. 2. The way he plays guitar: He probably just picked up a different way of playing, how hard is that to believe? Especially after 10 years. 3. Looking down to play guitar: He probably just wasn't having as good a day as the original performance. Think of it this way, in the 10 years after the performance of Yesterday, he had written a lot of stuff and Yesterday wasn't fresh on his mind because he hadn't written it so recently. There are others which are easily explained like the head tilting, but again, people change in 10 years, and pick up new techniques for stuff.

[@hole5shrimp]

no thats too plausible. pretty sure the entire british government, rest of the beatles/wives/kids, producers/technicians/roadies are ALL in on this... this is the switchup of the century....

[@michelewalburger9729]

Agreed. Who on earth is identical every day? Stupid conspiracy theories So sad and disrespectful to dear Paul who we are blessed to still have

[@jaimelesenfantsepstein737]

@@michelewalburger9729 RITE? PPL B THINKIN WAY 2 MUCH. THAT NOT WUT THA GOVERMENT WANT US 2 DO. WE AINT SUPPOSED 2 B THINKIN LIEK DAT. THAT NOT OUR JOB 2 THINK. OUR JOB IS 2 WORK 4 A BETTR WORLD WHER CHIDRIN CAN B WHOEVER THEY WANT 2 B AND HAV ACCESS 2 HOARMONE PILLS, WHERE WOMEN CAM ABORT THEY BABIES WHENEVER THEY NEED 2 (AT LEAST WE NEED 6 MONTH POST BORTH ABORTION IF WE NOT GUNNA B SEXIST LIEK DAT), WHERE SATANISTS CAN OPENLY PRACTICE THEY RITUALS N PUBLIC WITHOUT NO RESTAURAINTS N CAN OPENLY SACRIFICE N DO WUT NEED 2 B DON, A WORLD WHERE AGE B ONLY A ### N ADULTS N CHIDRIN CAN HAV FUN WIT EACH OTHA IF THEY WANT 2, A WORKD WHERE WE CAN B FREE TO XPRESS LUV 2 OUR ANIMALS BCUZ WE LOVE THEMS RITE?? I MEAN COME ON BRUH, IT B 2022 ALREDY, THA WORLD IS CHANGE. CHANGE GON CUM N WE KNEW THAT. PERIODT. WE NEEDA WORLD WHERE WE CAN ALL HAVE UNIVERSAL IN COME, FREE HELLTHCARE, FREE COLLAGE, N B TAKEN CARE OF 4 THA HARD WERK WE DO SERVING OUR MASTERS. #HAILSATAN. WE R A IMPORTANT ### IN THIS SYSTEM N WE NEED 2 FASILITATE THA CHANGE WE NEED 2 MAKE. A WORLD WHER PPL WORK HARD EVERY DAY N THEN WHERE WHEN DEY GIT SICKKK, THEN CAN B YOUTHENIZED, N THA ORGANS CAN B GIVEN 2 YUNG POC WHO NEED DEM 2 WORK 4 A BETTR WORLD. PERIODT. DEEZ WEIRDOS ALWAYS B TALKING N THINKIN. AGAIN, THAT NOT WUT WE R SUPPOSED 2 DO. THAT NOT OUR JOB 2 THINK. WE DONT GET PAYED 2 DO THAT. U FEEL ME? COME ON FAM. DNT WORREY BROTHAS, WE DON B ALRITE. THEEZ WEIRDOS AINT GON B AROUND 4 MUCH LONGER BCUZ WE GOT SOME NICE SUMMER CAMP PROGRAMS IN OUR NEW WORLD 🌍 🏕 💀 SATAN BLESS YALL 🙏🏿🌈🔪👶🏻🩸🩸🩸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️⚧💯💗🌀💗🌀🗣🗣🗣✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿🖤🖤🖤

[@markv.5962]

@@michelewalburger9729 yes indeed. these people who believe this are uninformed and clueless

[@TimWrightt]

>probably >probably So, you have no actual reason to dismiss the idea then? So be quiet, please.

[@sheilariley1261]

Paul had a round baby face. Adorable. Faul has a elongated face. So effening obvious.

[@jamesscanlan6240]

Obvious; like your room temperature IQ.

[@bazil9323]

Its called aging lmao

[@NickNack-l4q]

@@bazil9323 In their view, Paul, unlike John, George and Ringo, is not allowed to age, improve as a musician, or do versions of his songs remotely different to pre 1966. Blimey, look at John in the early years compared to the later years. He changed so much, but as with this theory, you would have to be stark raving mad to say that he had been replaced by an imposter. These guys need therapy.

[@dr.scanlan6112]

@@bazil9323Aren't these idiots amazing!?

[@paolaalmazan6441]

It's called a fringe 😂

[@SusanGoldberg-l9p]

The noses of the two Pauls are different in this video. The younger Paul (the original one) has a more natural looking nose. The second Paul (Billy) who replaced Paul after late 1966 -- has a nose that looks a little like he might have had a nose job. The tip of the second Paul's nose is pointier.

[@europoets]

The transition between Paul s voice on Red Album and Billy on Blue Album is Very noticable...z different peoole. Most people just didnt pay attention to it back then since his death was not announced...

[@europoets]

Try playing Eleanor Rigby and Penny Lane back to back and you notice it immediately

[@thetruthfornow6045]

@@europoets I did and it is the same person. Vocal DNA proved that point back in the late sixties. So it was put to rest.

[@garyenwards1608]

@@thetruthfornow6045 explain this Brainiac kzbin.info/www/bejne/gV6WlpV-a7iDbsk

[@thetruthfornow6045]

@@cruksi7001 It was in the newspapers and on tv back then. My mom saw it. I notice no one disputes it. If they did they could do it again now. There are plenty of musical sources available pre 1967 and after.

[@gaylealleluia8392]

@@thetruthfornow6045 There is new, better voice forensic techniques today and there is true Beatle Paul, and, as John referred to Billy as “False Paul,” Faul, they are two different people

[@dirgesinthedark5637]

It flows out of Paul with feeling of a composer. Billy is pure distain

[@OCTOBERBABY7901]

Because its not Billy's song. That's why he has distain for singing JPM's songs. he rather sing his own from late 66-present day.

[@TimWrightt]

disdain*. And it's not disdain, he just has no connection the words. Paul is feeling them as he sings them, which is why his tone is far superior.

[@dancegod1691]

Lol he’s just singing different because he’s sitting down and looking up at the mic.

[@jonasrmb01]

@@TimWrightt no, his tone is far superior because he probably has a higher (and much more beautiful) voice

[@kauromisweas3375]

Exactly, finally someone says it like it is. For me is just good vs evil.

[@louk6196]

I called BS on this until 24 hours ago. Then I started to actually watch the videos. After 1966 Paul sings in a lower key, has different pronunciations and different mannerisms. He is more nasal. He sometimes forgets that he is left-handed. Even his personality changed. That is obvious to us when comparing interviews but Jane Asher herself said he had changed.

[@SusanGoldberg-l9p]

You are in touch with reality, unlike the PID deniers. All it takes is an open mind and confronting the truth. Plenty of proof with all these videos and podcasts on the internet.

[@carmelanoname3526]

a pity she did not really notice his boyfriend had changed, but only assumed. OMG!

[@thelordofliberty6984]

@user-rd4zq4pf2y You have a very open mind. Perhaps you can explain why "Billy's" daughter Beatrice and his grandson Arthur look just like Paul McCartney? It is said from the PID community and in the book The Memoirs of Billy Shears that "Billy" had massive plastic surgery too look like Paul. You can't pass down plastic surgery in your DNA. Maybe instead of relying on internet video clips, you should try relying on common sense.

[@SusanGoldberg-l9p]

@@thelordofliberty6984 I will have to look at photos of Beatrice and Arthur. Regardless of what they look like, Paul was definitely replaced. I am relying on my common sense. I was around when Beatlemania first started. Later, maybe around 1969 -- I didn't understand the Paul is Dead rumors. I didn't take it seriously because it didn't make any sense to me. Paul was still in the group. The thought that Paul might have been replaced with a double never entered my mind. In 2017, I was directed to websites that said: Paul really died. This caused some confusion for me, but then the possibility that Paul had been replaced with a double was discussed in numerous podcasts by numerous people. I had noticed through the years that Paul's ears were different, and his brown eyes often looked blue recently. After studying podcasts, videos, photos, and reading books about the Beatles -- I came to the conclusion that Paul had been replaced. I started to notice more physical differences, differences in the voice and personality -- and it made sense. The Beatles seemed depressed after 1966. I hadn't noticed it before -- but I noticed it now -- watching their videos. Sage of Quay and Tina Foster have put out great podcasts on the subject. Paul was really replaced. That is the truth -- regardless of who believes it. The physical differences and personality differences are there. It's not the same man.

[@louk6196]

@@thelordofliberty6984 Billy Shears Campbell won a Paul McCartney lookalike competition so plastic surgery would have meant tweaking certain features such as earlobes and scars that fans would have noticed, not full facial reconstruction. Billy Shears children and grandchildren look like him.

[@howthebeatlessaveusfromboredom]

Paul glances at his hands while he plays Yesterday minimally--maybe 2-3 times tops. Billy must constantly glance at his hands while he plays. I've been playing guitar since the 70s and decided to learn Yesterday a couple of months ago to see if I needed to look at my hands while I play it. I do not and I'm curious to know if other veteran guitarists need to constantly glance at their fingering while they play the song. Thanks for making this video. I never got around to it while I was researching this topic. I wish people would take some time to do their own research and/or read Memoirs of Billy Shears before coming to a conclusion about this issue.

[@mitch1847]

Yes, it's the same guy. Anyone with 2 working brain cells and a modicum of intelligence knows a grown man can change the color of his eyes, grow 2 inches in height, change playing style, have a different shaped head, and a different voice, all within a year. And anyone can make their left eye socket move up 1/2 inch. I've done that. It's easy. Not to mention the hair on his head. Some guys even have hairy gorilla arms, then a year later they're smoother with less hair. And some get forget when they joined the most successful band in the entire history of forever. Damn, just yesterday, 3 people called me Billy for no reason at all.

[@Kelvinack]

Color of eyes always depends on lighting and camera quality, a friend of mine whom I've known for 5 years once said to me she never noticed I had green eyes and always thought they were brown, height of a person depends on shoewear and for that matter Paul did seem to be a bit taller than the others even in early interviews with the "real" Paul, change playing style? You gotta be kidding me, he's a musician, trying out different things on an instrument, getting to know it better, Paul has the same voice in boths clips, but even if he didn't in the first he was 32 and in the second 23, your body and your voice changes in 9 years, also he's a singer who can try out new things on his songs, Michael Jackson also doesn't sing They Don't Care About Us the same way he sings Man In The Mirror, that thing with the eye socket is just ridiculous, Paul always had his Gorilla arms, look at the 1968 White Album picture collection, and do you know how people change their hair on their head? It's called a haircut, ever heard of it?

[@codetech5598]

@@Kelvinack The differences cannot be explained by things like lights and hairstyles. There were multiple actors playing the role of "Paul" *right from the beginning.*

[@rawnature5356]

WAKE UP,PAUL IS DEAD.

[@garyenwards1608]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gV6WlpV-a7iDbsk

[@lucadeflorio502]

The real Paul has a slight deeper voice than billy shear

[@LaMYsteriosa87]

Fuller too.

[@luishumbertovega3900]

Mike McGear agreed to have a brother replacement, like a part of an engine at the mechanic's shop. "My brother died ? No problem, got a substitute ? Great, send him in !" Pppppppppleeeeease !!!

[@MegaGenten]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@trebleclef46]

I have been a singer/ guitarist for 50 years..pro for 30. My voice has changed considerably since I was 20. I could sing higher then..but have better tone & control now. Amateurs judging how voice, tone and timing changes...and concluding it must be a different person, have not a clue what they are talking about.

[@elizabethfonseca922]

These people are pathetic, this whole nonsense should have been over right after it started. There's been only one Paul McCartney.

[@guitarvorous]

You need to read more

[@cliffheywood3671]

@@elizabethfonseca922 no one plus bill shepherd

[@mileswalcott7241]

Everytime you conspiracy theories talk about Billy fall and James Paul McCartney you always use the song yesterday as your benchmark one of the most difficult songs to sing I've never heard you all try other songs like Elonara Rigby, night before ,And I love her or Michelle.

[@guitarvorous]

@@mileswalcott7241 there is no Paul. It was always Billie

[@milosit]

There's a rumor that this video died on April 6, 2022 and what you're watching now is an imposter.

[@Rippaul1966]

Oooohhhh nooooo

[@robertlooper6764]

Or maybe everyone watching it is an imposter!

[@bonessakellis195]

You're all insane thing's change in 10 years can you not see it's the same person please long live Paul McCartney!

[@jenniferm6042]

At least 5 different people play that 1 character on the world stage

[@Rippaul1966]

Things do change a little , but not that much! Nobody is that different after 10 years! This is clearly not paul.

[@Rippaul1966]

@@jenniferm6042 I disagree. From what I have seen it seems like one person. That being said, it is certainly a possibility that it is more than one person, that would make some sense. However I have found very little evidence to say that with certainty, I believe it is far more likely that there is just one, that person being the one and only Billy Shears.

[@bonessakellis195]

@@Rippaul1966 I'm 56 my ears nose and neck look different from when I was 46. Look at yourself 10 years ago. There's no way in hell if Paul McCartney had died in 1966 without the world knowing about it let alone someone with the same talent looks identical plays left handed do you know how hard it is to do that. The Beatles yes left some clues behind sure shits and giggles that's all it was. It's all for fun people also listen to Mike Williams channel what a joke !!!

[@Rippaul1966]

@@bonessakellis195 Mike Williams has some really weird theories, I think he takes this whole thing way too far. I respect what he is doing with his channel but I disagree with him on a lot of points. But anyways, agree to disagree on this. Have a great day though. Peace out ✌️

[@DungeonTV100]

Hes miming in the original though.. where on earth do you think the string quartet is coming from? Tape!

[@pointormond]

1976 compared to 1965.. Show me an artist who doesnt slightly vary up one of their old classics after that length of time. Hes just laying back into a live groove and giving it a different treatmet - it doesnt mean its a differnt person ffs.

[@CIS_22]

If we go by this logic then Elvis was replaced in 1970 and the real Elvis is still alive or Michael Jackson was also replaced in the 1990s and the real mj is still alive.

[@pointormond]

@@CIS_22 If we go by that logic Id say you have missed my point completely.

[@Paul-gn6bt]

The earlier version sounds like it is played at a slightly faster tempo and has a backing tape. The later version is slightly slower and has a live backing. Can't really see how this is supposed to be a different person or phoney imitator playing it the second time. Same chords, same key. A great little song that became a classic played ten years after he wrote it. Probably lucky he doesn't sue you for defamation!

[@billyhenry27]

This is NOT the original Macca

[@pointormond]

@@billyhenry27 kzbin.info/www/bejne/oJa2nnmmbsuihq8

[@chrisnolan5607]

Totally Billy Shears aka Vivian Stanshall of the Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band. The Real Paul here is sooooo much better than the Imposter Billy.

[@shivasirons6159]

Notice how he wrote 9 #1 hits after the beatles.

[@louk6196]

Sold his soul.

[@DexLikesMinecraft]

@@louk6196 To have silly dreans

[@agentj7852]

@@louk6196 Ah yes, he had Satan's cell # and easily made that deal.

[@cristobalecheverria2781]

he wrote? lol

[@zoeazsss5035]

Let me introduce to you the one and only Billy Shears, Nothing is Real, Strawberry Fields Forever. RIP Paul. I can see and hear the difference.

[@thetruthfornow6045]

That is the voice change over the years due to smoking and life in general. Both Paul's have hairy arms. That means they are one person. Listen to Jagger sing Satisfaction in 65 and again in 73. Big difference. Voice DNA said only one Paul. Stop being stupid.

[@LaMYsteriosa87]

Wonderful.

[@MacenW]

2 dummies

[@rjetsamonte5971]

Paul is dead is ridiculous

[@zoeazsss5035]

@@rjetsamonte5971 Thats your opinion, do some research.

[@jadaaakk]

Paul has a magical vibe when he sings yesterday, feels like he’s putting his whole heart when singing it…

[@guitarvorous]

Not as much as Billie

[@cliffheywood3671]

@@guitarvorous faul

[@garryleeks4848]

He did , only the real Paul McCartney could that, and let it be , hey Jude and so on , the only fauls are the ones that don’t believe in it 👍

[@garryleeks4848]

@@guitarvorous you mean Paul

[@jackdshellback3819]

@@guitarvorous Billie Holiday Yeah, she was great wasn't she?

[@evanmeiskin6498]

there was a voice test with advanced equipment. It looks at voice signatures. This is like fingerprints. Flats sharp etc. They found it was exactly the same guy.

[@truthseeker9692]

post it here

[@AuntKimmySez]

I think the Beatles were counting on the gullibility of half their fan base when they put all those alleged "clues" in their songs & whatnot.

[@jonasrmb01]

almost all singers are a little bit flat except maybe for elite opera singers that doesn't prove anything the only singer that a master imitator couldn't imitate that comes to my mind might be freddie mercury because of his unusually slow (and irregular) vibrato but mccartney is absolutely possible to immitate you probably watched that wacky video by wings of pegasus which doesn't even remotely prove that it's the same voice if you can't hear that billy does not have the same range and richness of tone in his upper registers as paul did then you're absolutely deaf

[@agitatedmongoose]

paul's voice got better in the 60s. By 69 it is was at his very best. So if this is a man named Billy Shears (which it isn't) he is by far the better singer

[@botvertex3830]

and writer I mean to think some random dude made all of the wings catalog + solo paul would just be insane and if so I prefer billy😂

[@agitatedmongoose]

@@botvertex3830 exactly. I am not on board with the Billy thing at all as I imagine you are not either.

[@botvertex3830]

@@agitatedmongoose oh yeah it's 100% not true funny how some people think it is

[@garryleeks4848]

@@botvertex3830 Paul 👍

[@TimWrightt]

@@botvertex3830 "its not cuz i say so" - typical brainwashed slave

[@scarlettspyder]

Paul never looked at his guitar when hé played…😢

[@Truthseeker-kc8rd]

I never listened to this song , i just got to know about this conspiracy.I dont know why but the old clip legit teared me up. It moved me

[@nadiachristiansen7599]

That's propably because the guy singing it died in 1966 and was replaced with William Campbell who looks nothing like Paul McCartney (1942-1966) and sings nothing like him.

[@carmelanoname3526]

@@nadiachristiansen7599 you cannot be serious - this is the most ridiculous comment I have read. He looks exactly the same and sings exactly the same.

[@dylanakent]

10 years is a lifetime in the performance levels of a musician, particularly a singer. The voice is not like a physical musical instrument you can put away in a box for years and pick up later and have it sound nearly the same. The voice is subject to change not only year over year but day to day and even hour to hour because it's part of a human body. Some singers get stronger with age and most do not. It takes intense conditioning and practice and sheer LUCK to maintain your voice over the years. No amount of money can guarantee that! As far as looking at the guitar, there are a MILLION factors why someone would look in various places at a live performance, particularly the star of the show who is The Boss at the time. I'm calling this Billy Shears controversy for what it is - ignorance about musicianship, performance and the music industry. That's Paul McCartney.

[@cutekanjii]

Ignorance about seeing a different person with different features they look very alike but it's obvious they are 2 different people. Like 2 twins always have slight differences. Maybe if u are not a very observant person u might not be able to tell them apart but an observant person can.

[@ignaciocardenas7640]

@@cutekanjii...

[@jivet3919]

These people are insane. It’s wild.

[@LaMYsteriosa87]

@@jivet3919 Awake to the reality in front of them. Big difference. Contrary to many others.

[@NickNack-l4q]

@@cutekanjii Playing the usual "you're not smart enough" card and saying "it's obvious" is not a good look when you are 100% wrong. Plenty of evidence of this to open your closed mind. That is, if you are observant enough when you are presented with it. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mHTJZYWhpNyHodU

[@jeffp6072]

Obviously The whole Paul is dead stuff is just silliness but still fun to talk about.

[@miriam2956]

My brain hurts from some of these peoples "logic" I can't. This rumor is so stupid lol. Their "Evidence" adnsfonadofoad.

[@asichka2]

All i can say it is HAHAHAHAHAHAH,this imposter can't do anything,as i see in his eyes i could read''yesterday,you love him,but now you must love me!Me-me-me-me and you are fools and i can play with you like dolls!!!''

[@VideoSaySo]

Paul sings from his diaphragm. Billy sings from his throat. Singers don't switch up like that with the same song.

[@joycampbell7417]

To me JPM is showing traits of a Lancashire accent in his singing voice., Billy probably is just getting plastic scouse accent. (I'm scouse, I hear it).

[@GodsMan500]

His head goes back in the first version because the mic is set very high. In the second version the mic is low. The looking at the fretboard is interesting, but it could be that he was better practiced in the second clip. I think most of the evidence supports that his death is a hoax, it is fun and harmless to speculate and wonder about it. The Beatles obviously had fun with it with all the “clues” they provided. I’m sure it also beefed up the sales numbers.

[@Kieop]

There is nothing fun or harmless about PID. The original hoax may have been fun and harmless, but what it has evolved into is EVIL. Either Paul is dead and the entire music industry, government etc is complicit in perpetuating this massive fraud for some nefarious purpose, or he is alive and there is an equally evil conspiracy out there trying to convince people that he isn't for some equally nefarious purpose. This is not just a collective of individuals looking for clues. Someone is doctoring photos, reversing photos, making documentaries, writing new editions of The Memoirs. It's a massive effort. Why?

[@sammyhoffman4812]

If your evidence is comparing a performance over 10 years apart and them not being the same. You need a new theory

[@philliptate148]

Thing is there is 10 years or more difference in these videos. You can't expect the 65 live version to sound like the mid 70s versions. Paul is Paul not billy shears

[@marcobaretta]

Faul hangs around with Putin in the kremlin. You think he would not lie about identity theft. Come on man. As Joe Biden would say.

[@pantsbeontheground1620]

Fake Paul is 6ft tall ,towers over the band.Real Paul never looks at his hands when he plays! Body language tells everything

[@Ashyri]

God I can’t tell if this comment section is just a bunch of trolls or being dead honest…

[@yolowell9564]

Same

[@chrisreidy439]

@@yolowell9564 Both.

[@sharky09000]

I can only imagine Paul wanted to keep his soul, RIP Paul & many more no doubt.

[@AnyoneCanSee]

You are delusional.

[@cisster76]

The real Paul is still alive. He has a band but I can’t recall the name of it but one can research him at his house

[@ZeraphineDoll]

Absolutely 2 different people, and that man that Linda married, who is it 😂😂😂😂 I’ll believe the Italian scientists before some blind KZbin troll.

[@keithneal4410]

Oh, I have a lot to say. Yes two different people, two different guitars, two different performances. While both are playing a concert, Billy is doing all of the singing opposed to Paul who is splitting the vocal chores with John and George and maybe Ringo that usually sang one song in the show. Billy struggles to get through the arraignment, spaces between chord changes and a lot of looking down. Different strum/picking pattern as well. While the performances are over ten years apart and Billy's head is taller and thinner than Paul's round egg shaped head. Also add five years to Billy as he was born in 1937. We all know Paul was born in 1942. That making Billy 39 years old at the time of the Wings Over America performance. In most cases when the human voice gets older the vibrato slows down, Billy's is very fast in this clip, nervous maybe? Paul's is smooth and almost no vibrato. This can also be heard on some of his recording. Paul's voice was had a more stuffed up sound to it. Billy tried to copy this by singing from the roof of his mouth or speeding up the recording after a vocal take. Compare "I'm Down"/"Long Tall Sally", Paul's vocal to "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Harts Club Band"/"Oh Darling", Billy's vocal. Also compare "For No One", Paul's vocal to "She's Leaving Home", Billy's vocal just a year later. Graham Nash was quoted saying "People think Paul McCartney was in Wings". It is a known fact that all the caricatures in The Beatles had at least two to three doubles. The interview and videos are on the web. Also check out all the NME concert performances, pay close attention to Paul's body langue. One is very sure of what he is supposed to do and the other it might be his first show as a Beatle.

[@Rippaul1966]

True. All good points

[@beatlebrian4404]

I don't agree with anything you say! The Graham Nash interview? Yes it's on KZbin but it's quite obvious when you, see all the interview that Graham Nash was talking about, time moving on! And that some people think Paul McCartney was in wings! In other words so young they can't remember McCartney in the Beatles, that's all he ment, but of course all the PID people just edit a little clip for you to see! I'm going to see McCartney at Glastonbury this year and I will be seeing the same man who sang "Love Me Do" in 1962.

[@senseichess8688]

Lol ok...and your not smart enough to get what Nash was implying...paul is alive

[@beatlebrian4404]

@@senseichess8688 yes of course he is and I'll be going to see McCartney at Glastonbury, a few weeks time.

[@senseichess8688]

@@beatlebrian4404 lucky you..enjoy

[@olgadefeo598]

These conspiracy theories are hilarious! 😂 Moreover, this Billy Shears is really talented, since Paul's best music came from 1967 onwards (Sgt Pepper, the White Album, Abbey Road, Let It Be).

[@awesomeartdigital6077]

They are both the same person, Paul McCartney. Yes Paul's voiced changed in the 10 years when he first played the song live, that's a natural thing people go through. Paul never died and Billy Shears is a made up character to which if you paid any attention Billy Shears was actually Ringo. The very fact that there are people without any intelligence that would actually believe Paul died and was replaced by some lookalike who can write like Paul play over 13 instruments like Paul is just crazy and if you people had any common sense would know it would have been completely impossible to have happened. There's no evidence to support such a thing, its impossible. This is the real Paul not a lookalike.

[@carlomayr4494]

Se fosse vera la morte di Paul Mc Cartney nel 66, devo dire che chi ha scritto tutti i pezzi dopo Hey Jude ecc ecc è un vero genio. W Paul mc cartney. Saluti da Milano 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹

[@ironwood9]

Paul was very talented...very good at playing the acoustic...yeah, he hardly looked at the guitar.... I love stuff like this I just saw a video of Billy "playing Bass," a Rickenbacker, on "Silly love songs"...the bass line is AWESOME... what I hear in my headphones is this excellent bass playing, which seems to be played with a pick ..but Billy has no pick, and he doing this thing where he seems to be lightly strumming with his thumb, and I'm like: "What's going on, here"???

[@edwardhill7297]

Many bass players don't use picks

[@ironwood9]

@@edwardhill7297 Right. I never did.... always played by pulling the strings with alternating index\middle finger.... Plus without a pick, I'm free to slap and pluck, something pick- holders can't do....but you get a unique sound playing with a pick...in my experience, it's guitar players who play bass with a pick.... But Paul seems to do this swipe thing with his thumb, just striking the string on the downstroke...

[@edwardhill7297]

@@ironwood9 I'm not a bass player but I've played guitar songs like that, just improving and jamming on an acoustic. It's a bit odd but it's fun

[@cboisandlin9601]

Rest in peace Paul 😞

[@marciusbarreto3366]

Till there was you: Paul sings: And wonderful roses they send me Billy Shears sings: And wonderful roses they TEll me

[@robertlooper6764]

You can't possibly be serious in suggesting this as proof that Paul is dead...

[@rohnakp2396]

Dude many singers mess up lyrics What's your point exactly?

[@_steamfunk_2271]

Paul played Yesteday without looking at his guitar Billy keeps looking at his

[@lorichet]

I imagine it's difficult for a right-handed person to play left handed.

[@Caine462]

@@lorichetPaul McCartney was right handed all this time? Why’d he just play left handed?

[@noemifrometa9310]

Esa es una de sus canciones que son tantas !!!!! Mi favorita ❤

[@thomasfonager6986]

And the fact that Billy Shears was Ringos alter ego on Sgt. Pepper is just ignored?

[@PaulFormentos]

it was a red herring....

[@MaccaBulsi]

Lass dich einliefern, eingepackt in eine Zwangsjacke.

[@robertlooper6764]

Yes. Because none of what you're proposing makes a lick of sense.

[@paulewhite]

Different head, different voice, different style. Different person

[@barbaraferron7994]

If there's a faux Paul you've got to admire his talent to fill in for Paul so well, and at the sacrifice of his own personal life. Maybe there were fans who would have been traumatized by hearing that Paul died. If you compare older photos etc to later ones, I see more changes in John than Paul. Maybe the "Paul is dead" rumor was a cover up for faux John.

[@bustercherry8734]

They were all replaced at some point. Original "paul" is john halliday. Original john is colin unwin. Pretty sure marc staycer is the lennon that got shot.

[@Helsinki40268]

If Paul was replaced I think faul outdid Paul in every regard. Pretty much all major major hits from the Beatles came after 66

[@bustercherry8734]

@@Helsinki40268 Except the beatles didn't even write their own music from what i've heard. Theodor adorno did. The beatles were a tavistock institute creation.

[@JJJJJVVVVVLLLLL]

endless dreaming

[@carmelanoname3526]

I have heard that Ringo was replaced by Wrongo

[@micolsen9824]

10 years of smoking cigs and weed, is your answer. 🚬

[@aaronhughes2550]

Bingo

[@durandaldevil]

Like nobody’s voice has ever changed in 20 years? 😂😂😂

[@marcobaretta]

As well as their face, HIEGHT AND DNA. That is a lot of change for 20 years.

[@durandaldevil]

@@marcobaretta do you have the proof?

[@marcobaretta]

@@durandaldevil In the early sixties, Paul had a child with an Erika Hubers a woman in Germany. There child was called Bettina. For years Paul paid money to this woman and her child. Even though he claimed it was not his. In Germany on the woman's birth certificate it says Paul McCartney on the birth certificate to this day. It has never been removed. In 1984 in a DNA testing Paul( aka Faul) was found not to be the father. She then accused him of using someone else's DNA to hide the fact. Italian DNA specialist and experts invited Paul to have his DNA compared with that of the rest of his family. He then turned it down. Strange behaviour for a man who did no wrong. In the 1980s when he was arrested for possessing drugs in Japan. The Japanese authorities took his fingerprints. They then learnt that Paul(the real one) in the early sixties had been deported from Germany for having set a room on fire in Hamburg. They also learnt that the German authorities had Paul's(the real one) fingerprints on file. So they requested it from the Germans. The Germans send Paul's fingerprints to the Japanese authorities. The Japanese then took Paul's(Faul in this case) fingerprints and compared them. It was a MISMATCH . They then imprisoned Faul because they thought he was both an impostor and a lawbreaker. He spend days in jail after the British government was eventually able to obtain his release. There is your proof. His fingerprints did not match. Yes people change over years BUT FINGERPRINTS DO NOT. So different fingerprints mean different DNA and different DNA therefore means two DIFFERENT people. Also till this day he won't have his DNA compared with that of the rest of the McCartney family. So there is your proof. Also he was friends with Putin in the 2000s. So it is not beneath him to lie. There is your proof

[@durandaldevil]

@@marcobaretta he probably really wasn’t the German girls father. Who knows what the hell the Japanese did to records of his digits digitally. Paul has a very unique look. And charm. Kind of hard to duplicate within the same little city don’t you think? And again, John and Yoko, who were his adversaries, would’ve said something in the 70s

[@marcobaretta]

@@durandaldevil "he probably really wasn’t the German girls father." Why pay money to a child who is not yours for years then? Also when Italian DNA specialists asked to compare his DNA with that of his brother Mike, he(Faul) chose not to. Strange way to behave if it is not your child. "Who knows what the hell the Japanese did to records of his digits digitally." Sorry you can't fake fingerprints. No way. Nor would the Japanese have had any reason to do so. They mismatched because they are not the same person. Remember the other sample they obtained was from the German authorities. So if they manipulated the fingerprints (which you can't) then they could have called the German authorities into question. Not something they would want to do or had any reason to do at the time. The reason the fingerprints mismatched was because they are two different people. Different fingerprints, different DNA, therefore different people. "And again, John and Yoko, who were his adversaries, would’ve said something in the 70s" At John's funeral Yoko accused Faul of having opposed John. Which of course Faul denies. Also maybe John was about to talk and tell the whole truth. This may explain why he really died in 1980. As well as for saying he was bigger than Jesus( which was not entirely untrue). Paul(Faul) even has difficulty remembering his own life. In an interview in 1987 he claimed that he wanted to become a teacher and that was what he was qualified to do. That singing had been the last thing on his mind. TOTALLY WRONG. In an interview in America in 1964 when asked about if he had any other career choices in his life. Paul(the real one) says no. Singer/songwriter and being a Beatle is all he ever wanted to do. His teacher and prominent educator Allan Durband from Liverpool testified that all Paul ever wanted to do was play his guitar and do music. He had no intention of persuading him otherwise. Paul's love for music was so great he was failing all his subjects baring English. This was in an interview in 1965. Again Faul has difficulty remembering his own life. Decades after the song Let it be come out he was asked what inspired him to write it. He says in a dream he had in 1969 his mother come to him. It was a stressful time in his life and he asked her for advice. Let it be was the advice she gave to him. He (Faul) felt that this was a sign from his mother who had died 10 years prior in 1959. Again TOTALLY WRONG. His mother(Mary) died in 1956, 13 YEARS BEFORE THE SONG WAS WRITTEN. The man can not even remember when his mother died. Paul's mother died on 31 October 1956 at the age of 47. Which child would not remember such an important event in there life. Strangely he remembers when Jim his father died on 18 March 1976 and was buried at Landican cemetery on the 22 March 1976. Three days later he is filmed in Copenhagen having a party with his friends on the 25 March 1976. Yes he had a concert on the 23rd March 1976 in Berlin. But he would have been able to make it if he had wanted to. Problem with that was that Jim had remarried in 1964 to Angie. Angie the stepmother asked Paul not to be at the funeral. Strange thing to ask your stepson. Especially if he is the man's biological son. But he is not. He is Faul. The real Paul had died in 1966. There is your proof.

[@jammontgomery2320]

Okay, I know this is a different song but here's The Beatles in 1963 playing 'Till There Was You' live (their concert in Royal Albert Hall), he does look at his guitar while playing: kzbin.info/www/bejne/q3XbdJpno92IodEfeature=shared Maybe the reason why Paul doesn't look that much on his guitar back then is because a.) They're miming a song (even in their concerts, yes, because who could've noticed? Their concerts were always overshadowed by the wild, screaming fans). b.) The camera was not focused on Paul all the time, hence, we may not get to see him looking down (but in that Royal Albert Hall concert, the camera was focused on him, so we see his full movements). C.) Depends upon a song that he's playing (although this is something I'm uncertain about). I don't know, I'm still torn about this, there are some aspects where yes, makes them unusually different from one another, but there are some inconsistencies in those comparisons. I don't know, it's hard to judge because only the closest people to Paul would know if he's still the same guy or not (what I mean here are the people who knows him since from the beginning, in their Quarry Men days or way before that), because if one only knows Paul in his Beatle days (granted the fact that they're groomed by Brian Epstein on how to act in public), it would be hard to know him personally, because what we see he does on camera is what he may not do off stage. If there's one theory I do find plausible is the fact that The Beatles were actually a manufactured band by the Tavistock Institute (a social experiment), this is due to the coincidences I've seen: it's been said that The Beatles didn't wrote their songs (some pointed here that 'Yesterday' was based on a 19th century Neapolitan song), and it's been said that Theodor Adorno wrote their songs and the fact that he died in 1969 (the time that the Beatles had broken up) makes my eyebrows raise everytime, it's just coincidental, and the fact that The Beatles went to America 4 months after JFK was killed (the country was still mourning at the time), then suddenly it had the whole America focused on them and forgot JFK's death, and not just that, but the fact that the British invasion happened immediately in America where all British entertainment became highly successful in America (even the TV shows like The Saint and The Avengers and even James Bond) not long after The Beatles arrived, and the fact that they've overshadowed any bands at that time, as in all, they've literally dominated the world like no one can stop them, now get me? It's just all seems suspicious to me, and the less said about The Beatles involvement in their advocacy regarding the Vietnam War (to which JFK was heavily opposed into). Don't tell me that all the records they've made, all these so called 'revolutionizing music', the non stop sales and chart dominations for a very long time, even the songs released when they're no longer touring still topping the charts were all naturally happened, it's just all impossible, especially for a time where internet is not yet existing, don't tell me "it's because of their talent", there are many bands who were just as talented as The Beatles at the time, or maybe even more talented than them at that time, and made catchy songs as The Beatles did, but why they've never made it big? It's like the society at the time only focused on The Beatles like they're the only band in the world at the time, and again, those groundbreaking records, it's impossible that they've been all achieved by one band, the same for the 'ahead of its time sound' in their songs (especially from 'Revolver' onwards) where they've got that sound? It's all seemed magical isn't it? But if one may look into the reality of things, considering it's 60s, and considering that this was not done by several (other) musicians, but just one band, is all the more dumbfounding and mysterious. The Beatles had the strongest marketing at the time, but if EMI are the ones behind the marketing, then why they didn't do the same for other bands who were under them? Let alone Brian Epstein could've done it all alone, I think there's a more bigger organization behind the more wider marketing of The Beatles (even down to the merchandising which are everywhere too, at the time, none of the bands got the same merchandising as The Beatles at the time, not even Elvis Presley), and that led to John Lennon declaring that they're even "bigger than Jesus", and that was the evident as to how they're really big at the time to the point where Beatlemania almost became a religion, now tell me, are there nothing suspicious to it? Think, better think, my friend. It's all getting fishy to me, like there's something shady. And about their musicianship, if they're really the great musicians the world is telling us, then why the Decca Records rejected them? (Decca rejected The Beatles in favor of The Tremeloes), if they're really a bunch of talented lads who could do great, musically, then why Decca chose The Tremeloes over The Beatles? Doesn't makes sense to me, now, I think what the people are saying about The Beatles being the early version of The Monkees are not that far off from the truth (even the allegations of session players in the recording studios playing for The Beatles, the 'Hey Bulldog' music video? Again, it's a music video, it may have been mimed), sometimes I couldn't help but to believe it and see through the blurred glasses. That theory, in my opinion, are more plausible than the Paul is Dead theory (although I could see some clues that the pre-1966 and the post-1966 Paul are different, but it's a bit inconsistent, to say the least, now the Tavistock Institute theory, I think there's more truth to it, because there were many aspects in the Beatles Era where it's a bit suspicious). And think about this: George Martin, The Beatles' producer, had been taught of playing oboe by Margaret Asher, the mother of Jane Asher (who happened to be Paul's girlfriend at the time), see the connections? It's like a small world, isn't it?

[@michaelparker5510]

Paul is alive and well. What ever is the matter with people

[@rhrh2025]

Some of the vocal differences could be because of the mixing, but I'm hearing other differences and seeing them as well. During an interview in Australia, George referred to Paul as "Faul" and it's easy to understand. I've as always found that interview to be interesting!

[@pacomarcone4271]

Some people have nothing to do…

[@orlandosoto6080]

Tell me about it 🤪

[@jennytaylor3324]

From hearing them both compared elsewhere on Utube, as a singer, I observe that 'Billy' uses more of a jazz style, swooping up to his notes, whereas Paul hits them squarely, more like a choir boy. The 2nd performance was more sensitively delivered, also. I'm still somewhat on the fence over all this, but if it is ifor real then Billy truly does have a shadow hanging over him: Paul's.

[@coZyLos]

I can’t believe this channel’s dedicated to Paul’s rumored “death”. Although I don’t believe this rumor, i still find these videos very interesting, kudos to all the dedication this channel gives for something that isn’t even true.

[@Rippaul1966]

Lol well I’ll take that as a compliment, agree to disagree on whether or not it’s true tho. Still glad u like the content!

[@coZyLos]

@@Rippaul1966 yeah and it’s also very worth watching considering how much effort you put making these videos.. you’re doing alright as long as you’re doing something you believe in, hats off to you, sir!

[@Rippaul1966]

@@coZyLos thanks 🙏

[@marioceva7163]

@@Rippaul1966 some people as me do not need proof for what is obvious. Are clearly two different persons.

[@harpar1028]

@@marioceva7163 me neva C him......BUT me no it is different person....FIJIAN DUDE....smart alec

[@calebcustombricks2631]

oh my gosh it's almost like there's 10 years between these performances, and in the "billy shears" one, his voice is "worse" because he's playing a long, 2 hour concert, rather than the 20-30 minutes shows the Beatles put on, and in the Wings tours - Paul sings every song. No shit his voice is going to be a bit worn out - look at how much he's sweating

[@chuckblank9063]

Paul was touring - probably "Wings Over America," playing an Ovation guitar which they took on Wings tours. He looks exhausted from rocking the stadiums. Recording Paul's voice changed from Beatles days being less mid-rangish to the fuller sound during Wings. These are both Mary's son James Paul.

[@Concertgoer-mj5ek]

It looked like in the first one that he wanted to speed through it, having just gone on tour and doing Beatles he probably wanted to just burn through the Beatles and do his regular stuff

[@boojiboy584]

Miss him, Miss him, Miss him. . .

[@elizabethfonseca922]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 John Lennon laughing from the grave.

[@boojiboy584]

@@elizabethfonseca922 ❤️👍🏻

[@stephenspringer2203]

You are right the voice is different. Eleven years will change it. Cigarettes as well as he admitted to those changing. Watch other performances of him as a Beatle and you will notice the same then as now in 2023. Sir Paul is very much alive.

[@bennyboi1132]

This guy: “notice how he tips his head up when he sings.” Me: “MAYBE it’s because his mic is higher than his mouth.😂”

[@Pmfried]

So, your biggest argument is that he looks down at his guitar in one performance, 10 years after another performance where he doesn't??? 🤣 & You really think his voice deteriorated between 1966 and 1976??? Come on!!! You can't say that "My Love" was anything but a vocal, lyrical masterpiece!!! Or even "Let 'Em In" or "Band On the Run" or many other of his songs from that era. Plus, in the old clip, he is singing it much like the original recording because it has just come out. In the 70's, he has "refined" the song to sing it in a more "sing-along"-friendly manner, since HE was the focus of the whole show (as opposed to the Beatles as a group). But I will give you the DEFINITIVE PROOF that it is the SAME PERSON.... Look closely at his EYES at ANY TIME of his life and compare it to ANY OTHER time of his life (they remain the same)! Paul's right eye is slightly "off angle" from his left eye! There is NO WAY this can be duplicated, neither naturally nor artificially, ESPECIALLY in 1966!!!

[@robertlooper6764]

They're desperate for any loony piece of "proof"

[@PompeyMatt17]

Given Billy Shears is a figment of people's imagination, tough call

[@TimWrightt]

"it is cuz i say so" - typical brainwashed slave

[@davidjames6551]

Never mind the difference in style just look at the difference in their ears, one has earlobes that are attached and the other one doesn't

[@moosemangarfield9650]

You would be shocked to learn how quickly a singer without vocal training can ruin his voice. Liam Gallagher’s voice was almost beyond repair in 2006 despite being completely fine in 1999.

[@agentj7852]

I'm afraid that your facts won't fly here.

[@jimo3173]

Did Liam Gallagher's jawline get longer, his eye color change, and his hairline change? If you can't see the obvious differences, it's because you don't want to see it and don't want to know the truth. Stay deceived, my friend.

[@DavidJohnson-tn2py]

I saw Paul perform Yesterday in 1993. Spot on, to 1965

[@kako1023]

JPM's ending on each line is so smooth. Billy's version here is ok

[@navydad8916]

And you dear are in need of mental health help !

[@hermmentyller4397]

If Paul really died in 66 I have to say this Billy Shears is waaay better then him. Look at what they did from 67 on, and more specifically to what "Billy Shears" did. Come on! Billy is my favourite beatle hahaha.

[@Rippaul1966]

I agree, Billy was far more talented than Paul.

[@retrobaseballjunkwax5302]

To be fair William is right handed...

[@Rippaul1966]

My point exactly

[@beatlebrian4404]

@@Rippaul1966 McCartney used his right hand as well, just because you lefthanded, means you never use your right!

[@Rippaul1966]

@@beatlebrian4404 the point that I am trying to make is that Billy was clearly having trouble playing left handed, which only happens when someone is naturally right handed, which is exactly what Billy Shears is. However Paul McCartney is left handed, so he, as seen in the second video, is playing left handed with far less difficulty.

[@beatlebrian4404]

@@Rippaul1966 where's the evidence, that your Billy is right handed?

[@Rippaul1966]

@@beatlebrian4404 in this video. He’s clearly having trouble playing

[@johnurban7333]

Let's see, I see Steve Howe, Eric Clapton, Jimmy Page, and many other guitarists look down at their guitars while playing songs they've played many times before. Not sure why that makes a difference

[@handle-schmandle]

Maybe they have all been replaced! 😃

[@johnurban7333]

@@handle-schmandle good point. That would explain it

[@mileswalcott7241]

I am sure that a singer can sing the same song in two consecutive performances and each time sing the song different it has to do with the mood and vibes from the audience

[@michelewalburger9729]

Exactly 💯

[@RSVPini]

@@michelewalburger9729 Just go see Bob Dylan. If you see him 16 times, you'll think there are 16 Dylans. This "McCartney is dead" joke is getting old. It's too bad that such a McCartney fan can't appreciate McCartney based on the fact that he thinks he's dead. Weird.

[@TimWrightt]

@@RSVPini Bob Dylan literally admits to selling his soul to the devil and he is just living out his end of the bargain. What a horrible example, thanks for proving us correct and Paul is dead.

[@RSVPini]

@@TimWrightt Oh boy. A Dylan conspiracy theorist. What else do you believe? Elvis is alive? Beethoven is in your oven?

[@bleeb2024]

@@TimWrightt THERE IS NO GOD AND THERE IS NO DEVIL :)

[@jamesmorris9816]

Man, you’ve been a naughty boy You’ve let your face grow long.

[@time4change878]

Faul is very talented. But he keeps going in and out of character

[@BeatleBobby]

he did not die.

[@VallaMusic]

yes indeed, Billy - you are not half the man you used to be

[@soundaffects8352]

The picking pattern is different. And the rhythm of the tune. Paul pulls the tempo about whereas Bill sings it straight. The head tilting...mic is different heights. The vibe could be diff as he was more "into" the song when he had performed it fewer times. The voice could be explained by sound tech etc. I *do* agree with the overall premise, please note.

[@Rippaul1966]

I see where you are coming from, however with all of this coming together, to me the Paul Is Dead theory is the only logical explanation.

[@soundaffects8352]

​@@Rippaul1966 - I did try to make it clear that I agree with the overall premise. And, although I have pointed out a couple of things which could be explained another way, other than PiD, I have also pointed out a couple things you had not caught onto - things which, I feel, are actually better evidence for PiD than some of the things you had mentioned.

[@Rippaul1966]

@@soundaffects8352 yes. Thanks for pointing those out to me

[@Rippaul1966]

@2v_5r well there are theories that there were more than one people who played as Paul after his death, though I’m not completely convinced about it. Either way, the differences between these 2 performances go far deeper than just him playing slightly differently. I explained it all in the video.

[@soundaffects8352]

@2v_5r - there is playing differently and there is playing differently. If you do not get it, no one would be able to explain it to you. And no singer, ever, went from rubato to straight.

[@QXZJX]

Strange paul started to do a bad charicture impression of himself from about 67 whenever he was interviewed?

[@chops4986]

Yep! He’s a good actor and good body double. Very smart and talented guy the replacement Paul is. But he is not the original guy.

[@Jasonwithadot]

@@chops4986 amazing that they found a guy that looks like paul, talks like paul, sings like paul, plays every instrument that paul did in the exact same way and is even a better songwriter than Paul.

[@PaulFormentos]

@@Jasonwithadot Billy was a session musician from 1963 who knew The Beatles

[@Jasonwithadot]

@@PaulFormentos source?

[@loraineashton4899]

Paul is softer billy is harsh two very different types of people.

[@marcobaretta]

Real Paul is a nice guy. Billy is a criminal who has been fined and spent time in jail for drug possession and hangs about with international dictators like Putin. Very different people indeed.