Paul's Disagreement with the Apostles

[@theodoreottey9784]

All I know is that I asked Jesus into my heart ❤ at age 14. Right away I began reading the gospels. When I got to Paul's letters I began to feel very uneasy about what I was reading. It was very confusing 😕 (Later on I learned that God is not a God of confusion).I was never a fan of Paul's from then on. When I was into my 50s I discovered You Tube. God led 🙏 me to The Saul of Tarsus articles explaining how Paul was a fake, a very good fake. We will be judged by our works folks so everybody 🤷 let's get busy and begin to care for the poor and needy.I hope I made myself clear.

[@leeshelenberger7240]

Asking Jesus to come in to your heart to save you is Not in the bible, it is believing what Jesus has done on the cross, Jesus died, buried and risen again, 1 Cor. 15:1-4,

[@ottom.3094]

I didn’t have a good feeling over Paul’s letters when reading them as well. Same uneasy feeling.

[@ottom.3094]

@@leeshelenberger7240 not that simple - gates are narrow not wide.

[@jimywebb23]

Exactly, he speaks with a forked tongue, which is not from the Father

[@leeshelenberger7240]

@@jimywebb23 Paul is apostle to the gentiles not Israel, that is why his letters are different from the 12 apostles. By grace Not by Law of Moses

[@slacker2747]

They could have just called Christianity as Paulism.

[@KeepingWatch95]

It is sad... the word Christianity is suppose to mean followers of Christ. However the word "Christian" did start with Paul and Barnabas in Antioch and not by Jesus and not by Jesus disciples. Acts 11:25 Then departed Barnabas to Tarsus, for to seek Saul: Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch. However Jesus commanded what was to be preached was to start at Jerusalem: Luke 24:47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. Jesus' disciples began preaching what Jesus instructed them to, at Jerusalem and not Antioch. What began at Antioch appears to be a new movement brought about by Paul and Barnabas. Paul and Barnabas soon split ways. And yes, Christianity is basically followers of Paul and Barnabas. When read carefully we can see Paul only claims to follow Jesus but doesn't in reality.

[@michielvdvlies3315]

@@KeepingWatch95 nope....read it closely they said the people there were the first who called them Christians. Christianity isnt created by Paul nor Barnabas!! the entire bible is about Jesus, Paul used loads of the Old Testament to make the point that Jesus IS God and there is only salvation trough Him!!!

[@KeepingWatch95]

@@michielvdvlies3315 Nor was Christainity created at Jerusalem. You should read Jesus' teachings closely for Paul does not follow Jesus but rather usurps his self proclaimed positions of authority.

[@michielvdvlies3315]

@@KeepingWatch95 nope wrong!!!

[@KeepingWatch95]

@@michielvdvlies3315 _Paul fails to follow Jesus' teachings._ _Paul proclaims (in 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy) I am “ordained/appointed” to be a preacher, an apostle, and a teacher._ *1 Timothy 2:7 Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.* *2 Timothy 1:11 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.* _For those that do not read or follow Jesus' commandments closely, the error(s) in what Paul has proclaimed can be easily overlooked._ _Here are some of Jesus's commandments:_ *Matthew 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, Christ; and all ye are brethren.* *Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.* *Matthew 23:10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, Christ.* (Matthew 23:8 & 10 Master,G2519) καθηγητής From a compound of G2596 and G2233; a guide, that is, (figuratively) a teacher: - master. Matthew 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: *for one is your [Teacher], Christ; and all ye are brethren.* Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Matthew 23:10 *Neither be ye called [teachers]: for one is your [Teacher], Christ.* _In Matthew 23:8 Jesus makes it clear he is the one Teacher (for one is your [Teacher], Christ)_ _In Matthew 23:10 Jesus makes it clear to neither be called teachers (Neither be ye called [teachers])._ _Also in verse 10 Jesus repeats what he had just said in verse 8. (...for one is your [Teacher], Christ)_ _Paul fails to keep Jesus' commandment “neither be ye called [teachers]...” even (in the same verse and in conjunction) as he proclaims himself to be an apostle._ _In other words; Paul is breaking Jesus' commandment not to be called teacher(s) at the same time as declaring himself as an apostle._ *1 Timothy 2:7 Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.* _Paul repeats this claim as an apostle and a teacher in 2 Timothy 1:11._ *2 Timothy 1:11 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.* _Once again Paul is breaking Jesus' commandment not to be called teacher(s) all while claiming himself to be an apostle._ _Furthermore in 2 Timothy Paul proclaims; _*_“ Whereunto I am appointed...”_* *#1 Question:* _Who had appointed Paul “a teacher;” after Jesus had instructed not to be called such; in_ Matthew 23:10 *Neither be ye called [teachers]: for one is your [Teacher], Christ.* _Paul claims likewise in 1 Timothy 2:7 _*_Whereunto I am ordained..._* Moreover *#1 Question:* _Who (against Jesus' commandment of (Matt __23:10__) not to be called a teacher) “ordained” and or “appointed” Paul as “a teacher?”_ _None of Jesus' disciples would have had the authority to break any of Jesus' commandments, and to go and “ordained” or “appointed” Paul as “a teacher.”_ *_#2 Question:_*_ Or is it perhaps, we are to believe that Jesus broke his own commandment and came to Paul privately (came to him secretly as it were) and “ordained” and “appointed” Paul as “a teacher” against Jesus' own commandment?_ *_#3 Question_*_ Or worst, should we assume that God “ordained” and “appointed” Paul as “a teacher” against Jesus' commandment? However If this were true (being beforehand Jesus declared he is our one Teacher; for one is your Teacher, Christ) this would mean God “ordained” and “appointed” Paul in the position of an Antichrist (which means in the place of Christ or instead of Christ.)_ _The above questions are mere speculations which seemingly can not fit as explanations as to Paul's claims._ _The important fact to remember is; for in effort to conform with Paul's statements (found in 1 Timothy 2:7 and 2 Timothy 1:11) it is of a necessity to break Jesus' commandment; _*_Neither be ye called [teachers]: for one is your [Teacher], Christ._* _Thus Paul usurps his (self claimed) position of teacher of the Gentiles._

[@salman13]

paul basically changed the religion to fit in with the romans. basically what we see pastors do today...talk about jesus but they're all in it for the money and fame.

[@KeepingWatch95]

_Jesus foretold and warned that false prophets would come. Paul came and does these very things Jesus warned about._ Matthew 7:15 *Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.* Matthew 7:16 *Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?* Matthew 24:23 *Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.* Matthew 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, *and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders;* insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Matthew 24:25 *Behold, I have told you before.* Matthew 24:26 *Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert;* go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; *believe it not.* Matthew 24:27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. _Jesus says in Matt __7:16__;_ *“...Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?”* _Paul said in;_ Galatians 1:11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. Galatians 1:12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. Galatians 1:13 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that *beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:* _It appears there was no greater among the thorns and thistles than Paul who persecuted the church of God “beyond measure” and “wasted it.”_ _Jesus says in Matt __7:16__;_ *“...Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?”* _Paul said in;_ 1 Timothy 1:15 This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save *sinners; of whom I am chief.* _Paul confirmed that there was no greater among the thorns and thistles for he was the chief of sinners._ _Jesus says in_ Matthew 24:23 *Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.* _Regardless of what Jesus had said (“...if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ ...believe it not” in Matt __24:23__) Paul wants others to believe that Jesus meet with Paul._ Acts 9:3 And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: Acts 9:4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? Acts 9:5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. _The road to Damascus is said to have been a desert place and may still be a desert place._ Matthew 24:26 *Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.* _Also Jesus says_ Matthew 24:24 *For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.* _Regardless of what Jesus' warns about signs and wonders in Matt __24:24__, Paul claims his signs of an apostle are in signs, and wonders..._ 2 Corinthians 12:11 I am become a fool in glorying; ye have compelled me: for I ought to have been commended of you: for in nothing am I behind the very chiefest apostles, though I be nothing. 2 Corinthians 12:12 *Truly the signs of an apostle were wrought* among you in all patience, *in signs, and wonders,* and mighty deeds.

[@FireShine-ss4sb]

If you read DEUT. 13:1-4.......you can see how Paul is a test to see who loves the Words of Christ in red, the true Gospel of the Kingdom of Heaven as taught by the 12 Real Apostles.

[@bobhowe4476]

⁠@@FireShine-ss4sbYES. I absolutely agree. Our Heavenly Father wants to know if we love Him enough to dig into scripture and be ridiculed for our efforts. If you think about it, what a cleverly creative way to get to know our Heavenly Father. That is what happened to me. I wanted to be set free. No matter where it led. Deuteronomy 13:3 and Jeremiah 8:8 prove we need to find out the Truth. And that’s the whole point of the Apostate church declaring inerrancy. So we would not start looking into the Pauline gospel.

[@andresullivan6473]

@@bobhowe4476 yeah it's a test to see if we will dig into scripture the guy next to him didnt follow paul so he was ok and went to paradise with Jesus I wonder if he had time to study the the red letters in the bible or did he just beleive that Jesus was the son of God 🤷

[@danaleanne38]

​@andresullivan6473 Yeshua has the power to save whoever he wants to .He can see into the hearts of men. Yeshua knew the man had no time to do anything but believe in him. That doesn't mean you who have time do nothing to show your love of him But showing your love by keeping his commandments. . Revelation 14:12 Here is the patients of the saints, here are they that keep the commandments of God and the faith in Yashua. Revelation 12:17 And the dragon was wrath with the woman and went to make war with the remnant of her seed on those who keep the commandments of God and the faith in Yashua. .

[@Son_of_Yahuah]

Again you have done a wonderful task of presenting what is written , great ...thank you

[@andresullivan6473]

So then paul's gospel is not the inspired word of God. If the bible is the inspired word of God the paul was included to trip us up

[@Sindi63084]

The word Bible means 'many books put together'. God has clearly said what His word is. Numbers 5:12-18. 1) His direct word He gave to Moses, (First 5 books of the old testament) and 2) the prophetic word He gives to prophets in dreams and visions. Yeshua came in the spirit of prophesy, Rev 19:10. In summary, God's word is the law of Moses and the gospel of Yeshua (which carries all the prophets upto the coming of Yeshua.) The rest of Bible contains historical books, inspirational books, letters of various apostles, etc, even Satan has spoken in the Bible. So in Isaiah 8:19-20, we are warned to measure everything with the law of Moses and the testimony of Yeshua. If it does not agree with these two it's of darkness. So, take Paul's teachings and see if they line up with the law and gospel. If not, it's of darkness, Shan him.

[@clarkewi]

You show that Paul had little regard for the Nazarenes. The problem is that the Nazarene's were Jesus' sect. So Paul is deviating from Jesus' teachings. Despite his great success, Paul has no authority to do such a thing. What Paul teaches therefore is error. And what is good is not new and what is new is not good.

[@annehelenetrippestadhasvik4361]

clarkewi Paul was the LEADER of the sect of the Nazarenes!! "For we have found this man a plague, one who stirs up riots among all the Jews throughout the world and is a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes." Acts 24:5

[@strikemaster1]

@ clarkewi ...Well said and amen.

[@duffgordon9005]

PAUL"S LETTERS WERE NEVER NOT CONSIDERED GOD-BREATHED, Look at the man's sufferings and his signs and wonders!! Who is your man????? You raise people from the dead- YOU HAVE AIUTHORITY. Paul's Honoring Christ bin the Gospel he receivedf IS SO WONDERFUL!! Why this hatred ?? It is pure- it takes away the FEAR OF DEATH- It is HAPPY NEWS!!

[@strikemaster1]

@@annehelenetrippestadhasvik4361 Some people do not understand what a wolf in sheeps clothing is. A true deceiver is one who gives you 95% of what you WANT to hear, but 5% false that can cost you your soul. The truth is this.... " I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd gives his life for the sheep. But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, sees the wolf coming, and leaves the sheep, and flees: and the wolf catches them, and scatters the sheep. The hireling flees, because he is an hireling, and cares not for the sheep. I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. As the Father knows me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd. (John 10:11-16 [AKJV])" If you have even a semblance of wisdom and understanding, you can see that Christ, in this passages above is speaking of both the Jews and the Gentiles. The hireling (anyone but Christ and His disciples) is not of God and neither are his sheep. Notice where it He says... "and known of mine"? The "mine" are those who put HIS voice above all others, including Paul. Notice also... "and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd" meaning both Jew and Gentile will be one fold under the same "Christ" or ONE Shepard which excludes any other gospel. Whether you choose to believe it or not, does not alter the fact that the Gospel of Paul is not the same as Christ and cannot therefore save. Right now, understand there is only one Gospel, and if any other differs from this, then it is false. If you fail to understand this very important teaching of Christ, you risk your own salvation. Anne... keep up the fight for truth. You are indeed of the fold of Christ.

[@camaradael2424]

@@duffgordon9005 muhammad also claimed many claims. The disciples attitude are far different from that of Saul of Tarsus. The disciples are humble. Saul was haughty.

[@KeepingWatch95]

Proverbs 28:9 He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be abomination.

[@rodlancaster6431]

go ahead with that right to the grave. Moses wrote the law in stone, God writes his Word on our hearts

[@rodlancaster6431]

If you heard the Law you would follow Jesus and ask Him to forgive your sin. Only he can atone for sin for he has victory over death.

[@KeepingWatch95]

@@rodlancaster6431 _Study Jesus' words and teachings_ King James Version KJV Luke 13:25 When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are: KJV Luke 13:26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets. KJV Luke 13:27 But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. *[iniquity G93]* G93 ἀδικία adikia ad-ee-kee'-ah From G94; (legal) injustice (properly the quality, by implication the act); moral wrongfulness (of charater, life or act): - iniquity, unjust, *unrighteousness,* wrong. Young's Literal Translation YLT Luke 13:27 and he shall say, I say to you, I have not known you whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of the *unrighteousness.* *_Above verse Luke _**_13:25_**_-27 compared to Matthew _**_7:21_**_-23;_* KJV Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? Matthew 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. *[iniquity G458]* YLT Matthew 7:23 and then I will acknowledge to them, that-I never knew you, depart from me ye who are working *lawlessness.* G458 ἀνομία anomia an-om-ee'-ah From G459; illegality, that is, violation of law or (generally) wickedness: - iniquity, X transgress (-ion of) the law, unrighteousness. *_Jesus' teachings in Luke _**_13:25_**_-27 & Matthew _**_7:21_**_-23 compared to Paul's teachings in Romans _**_3:21_**_ & Romans _**_6:14_**_;_* YLT Luke 13:27 ... depart from me, all ye workers of the *unrighteousness.* YLT Matthew 7:23 ... depart from me ye who are working *lawlessness.* _Compare Jesus teachings to Paul's teachings_ KJV Romans 3:21 But now the righteousness of God *without the law* is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; _Romnas __3:21__ _*_(without G5565)_* G5565 χωρίς chōris kho-rece' Adverb from G5561; at a space, that is, separately or apart from (often as preposition): - beside, by itself, without. YLT Romans 3:21 And now *apart from* law hath the righteousness of God been manifested, testified to by the law and the prophets, Romans 6:14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are *not under the law,* but under grace. *[not G3756]* G3756 οὐ ou oo Also οὐκ ouk ook used before a vowel and οὐχ ouch ookh before an aspirate. A primary word; the absolutely negative (compare G3361) adverb; no or not: - + long, nay, neither, never, no (X man), none, [can-] not, + nothing, + special, un ([-worthy]), when, + without, + yet but. See also G3364, G3372. Romans 6:14 for sin over you shall not have lordship, for ye are *not under law,* but under grace. *_Again: Luke _**_13:25_**_-27 & Matthew _**_7:21_**_-23 compared to Romans _**_3:21_**_ & Romans _**_6:14_**_;_* (Jesus' teachings compared to Paul's teachings.) _Jesus teaches in Luke __13:27__ & Matthew __7:23_ KJV Luke 13:27 But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. *[iniquity G93] [YLT: unrighteousness]* KJV Matthew 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. *[iniquity G458] [YLT: lawlessness.]* _Compare Jesus' teachings to Paul's teachings_ _Paul does not follow Jesus' teachings in Romans __3:21__ & __6:14_ KJV Romans 3:21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; *[without G5565] [YLT apart from]* KJV Romans 6:14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. *[not G3756] [YLT not]* *_Also 1 John 3:4 makes it clear lawlessness is sin._* KJV 1 John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for *sin is the transgression of the law.* [transgression of the law G458] G458 ἀνομία anomia an-om-ee'-ah From G459; illegality, that is, violation of law or (generally) wickedness: - iniquity, X transgress (-ion of) the law, *unrighteousness.*

[@markduett1532]

@@KeepingWatch95 Paul actually seems totally ignorant of anything that Jesus said or did. He seems to be acting on his own behalf. That was a very good explanation even though there is way more to back you're points up. If you will go back to the Torah (Law), you will see that God is constantly telling His people (Israelites) that they must keep His Law (Torah) "forever" and "as long as you live upon the Earth." So, it is no wonder that the Jews distrusted Paul since he was teaching that the Law (Torah) was no longer viable! What part of "forever" or "as long as you live upon the Earth" did Paul not understand? Or was it The Lord who made a mistake?

[@KeepingWatch95]

@@markduett1532 _The 13th Apostle Paul was and is, a wolf in sheep's clothing._ _It should be noted that Jesus of course would have known about Paul even before Paul came._ _And indeed Jesus did foretell to his disciples of what (or who) was going to come during this time:_ John 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. John 14:29 *And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.* John 14:30 *Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.* _The person of Jesus' prophecy in John __14:30__ had to come in a relatively short span of time. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion (verse John __14:28__) and before all his disciples had passed away (John __14:30__)._ _Jesus' prophecy did come true during the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. (Which is during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_ _But why didn't Jesus tell his disciples after this came to pass? Because (John __14:29__) he told them it before it came to pass, that, _*_when it is come to pass, ye might believe._* Please note the following: _Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (the 4 Gospels) are record of events which occurred while Jesus was talking much with his disciples._ _Paul epistles (13 letters) are record of events which came during the time Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (During the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_ _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. (John __14:28__-30)_ _What Paul teaches in Galatians:_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ Furthermore in Galatians 5:2 Galatians 5:2 *Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.* _(In Galatians 5:2 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) says “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _According to Paul; Peter was given [by God] an apostleship (Gal 2:8) or gospel (Gal 2:7) of circumcision. Paul then claims (Gal 5:2) “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _Paul is claiming that Peter was given (followed and taught) a gospel in which “Christ shall profit you nothing.” (That is; an unprofitable gospel in Christ.) An unprofitable gospel is just another way of saying a false gospel._ _And if Peter followed an unprofitable gospel it would also be true of all of Jesus' disciples._ _I doubt Jesus would agree that Peter (and all his disciples) were given and committed (by God) to a gospel in which Christ shall profit [them] nothing._ _This "contrariwise" teaching only comes from Paul, who indeed came while Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._ *_If anyone disagrees perhaps they can show a quote from Jesus saying that God committed Peter to a gospel that was unprofitable in Christ._* _Moreover:_ _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ _Further more Paul makes the following claim in Romans __11:13_ Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as *I am the apostle of the Gentiles,* I magnify mine office: _(In Romans __11:13__ Paul makes a clear claim to be “the apostle of the Gentiles”.)_ _(However before Paul came, and during the time (John __14:28__-30) that Jesus was talking much with his disciples; Jesus had already given instructions to his disciples to preach unto the Gentiles (teach all nations) and (into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.)_ Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _(Verse Matthew __28:16__ is addressing the remaining 11 disciples.)_ _(In Matthew __28:19__ “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,” all nations would of course include the Gentiles nations. Because Israel was the only nation that was not Gentile.)_ _More in the gospel of Mark:_ Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.* Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. _(Mark __16:15__ “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Does include all the Gentile people.)_ _And notice again in Matt __28:19__-20 Jesus gave them instructions to “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” … “ Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world..” (It appears Jesus says he would be with them as they did so, even unto the end of the world.)_ Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _The teaching that Peter was to preach to a different group of people is directly against, and is “contrariwise” to what Jesus told his disciples while he was with them and talking much with them. This “contrariwise” teaching (Galatians 2:7) came by Paul during the exact time that Jesus foretold about. Which is after the crucifixion and during the remaining time the disciples were alive, and while Jesus was not talking much with them. (John __14:28__-30)._

[@scripturethroughancienteye1509]

1 Corinthians 15 Paul admits he accepts the body of teaching associated with the other apostles. This presentation did not include all the relevant data.

[@forestshook3744]

So therefore it is invalid?

[@scripturethroughancienteye1509]

@@forestshook3744 Not including all relevant data does not ipso facto make the presentation wrong; but the specific datum mentioned invalidates the claim that Paul does not concede to the apostolic testimony concerning the resurrection. He admits they were witnesses before him and he cites the content of their witness as authoritative and coherent with his own. You can find it in 1 Cor. 15:1-3.

[@conkergemini6489]

Look at Ephesians Chapter 2 verse 8-9 and other examples. Does this remind you of someone else other than Paul?8. For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God- 9. not by works, so that no one can boast." Galatians I do not nullify the grace of God; for if justification comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing. (2.21) Why then the law? … it was ordained through angels by a mediator. (3.19) But the scripture has imprisoned all things under the power of sin… before faith came, we were imprisoned and guarded under the law until faith would be revealed. (3.22-23) …while we were minors, we were enslaved to the elemental spirits of the world. (4.3) Formerly, when you did not know God, you were enslaved to beings that by nature are not gods. Now, however, that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and beggarly elemental spirits? How can you want to be enslaved to them again? (4.8-9)

[@perrysaker-ee1gq]

Question? Was Jesus ever wrong? Because if Paul was a true apostle, it means Jesus was wrong about the future! And seeing as Jesus had warned the apostles what must take place before his return, i find it a bit hard to believe that he would fail to inform them that he would be popping back for five minutes to convert a murderer called Paul.. Someone that would later go on to take up most of the new testament and change the direction of christianity and contradict much of Jesus teachings is dimething u find impodsible to believe Jesus would over look. And then to tell them not to worry when he comes knocking claiming he has been called to preach to the gentiles.. "Sorry Peter i know i said you are the rock i will build my church on, and i know you are the one called to preach to the gentiles but Paul will be the one to take over". Just the dialogue alone of what Paul says took place betweenhim and Jesus on the road to damscus "Why are you persecuting me"? Sounds cheesy and again suggests Jesus wouldnt know why, and that he had to ask? Paul is no different to Muhammed! Both were false. The problem i have is why were the disciples not warned by the holyspirit? Or did God allow this to happen as to weed out the true from the false Christians?

[@daChosenone3]

They was you don't read your bible

[@AhrayahIsrael]

Christ who all Christians claim to be their Messiah clearly teaches to keep and do the law Mathews 5:17-19. Paul on the other hand teaches the opposite in Galatians 2:16 that no one is justified by doing the law. This teaching of Paul clearly contradicts the entire Bible.

[@bible1st]

@AhrayahIsrael Jesus Christ was a Jew who was coming to Jews. Paul was sent to Gentiles though. I mean am I right? Didn't Christ himself say that he was only sent to the lost sheep of Israel? 👈that would be jews.

[@AhrayahIsrael]

@@bible1st Paul in Galatians 3:23 is obviously speaking to an audience of Jews, saying before faith came we were kept under the law, speaking of himself and the Jews that he wrote his letter to, because the Jews were the only ones that the law was given to. The law wasn't given to the gentiles , so Paul was clearly speaking to Jews.

[@bible1st]

@AhrayahIsrael I do not agree. You can read many things on this. None of which say that he addressing only Jews in this letter. They say it was a mixture of Jewish born people and Gentiles from what I just read. 🤷‍♂️

[@AhrayahIsrael]

@@bible1st The point is that Paul is a liar. Every prophet to Christ and the 12 apostles all teach that God's law is to be kept eternally. Deuteronomy 11:1 Psalm 111:7-8 Mathews 4:4 Paul is the only one that teaches that no one is justified by doing the law Romans 3:20. Paul is clearly a false prophet.

[@bible1st]

@@AhrayahIsrael Paul's writing are scripture, Peter confirms this. If you call Paul a liar and a false prophet you are going straight to hell. Do you understand this?

[@danaleanne38]

Peter didn't want to eat meat sacrifice to strange gods .

[@thetruthnevertold]

Paul. all who call on the name of the lord shall be saved. Jesus not all who say to me lord lord shall enter the kingdom of heaven

[@orangeandslinky]

Yes, Right! The reason this looks like 2 TRUE but different Gospels is because they are. Mix them or try to, you get a hot mess. Remember not even John 3:16 has a clue about the finished cross work of Jesus Christ at all. Not because the 12 were stupid, they just never heard of it.

[@BGizzle8098]

Well Joel 2:28-32 says it also.. im gonna study for more context and understanding. Thus teaching has definitely gotten my attn.

[@EvangelistWORK]

Gotta start at Romans 6 before you get to chapter 10 to get the whole message. JESUS CHRIST GOD ALMIGHTY IN THE FLESH also said he was the first born among many brethren. You will do greater works is Paul not doing it?

[@Omega-AlphaStudios-lh1rz]

Purely childish comment. Did Jesus say "nobody who says Lord shall enter the kingdom of heaven?" Certainly not. Paul also said that the doers of the law shall be justified (Romans 2) and that Christ gives eternal life unto all those that obey Him (Hebrews 5).

[@Theendhasbegun8]

25 clear times paul co tradicts jesus. Faught with peter there is no fighting with the holy spirit as it agrees with itself. Why the fighting then? You are mistaken and not as educated or have the understaning you think you have. Mark also is in exstream contradiction to mathew john and luke as well. And jesus himself. Lol​@@EvangelistWORK

[@platzhirsch4275]

The next issue to adress is Galatians 2. It is not what he and they had been, but what they now were: he could have observed, that they were persons formerly of a very low figure in life, of mean occupations, fishermen by employment, and very illiterate persons, when he was bred a scholar at the feet of Gamaliel; but he chose not to make such observations, he knew that God was no respecter of persons, nor was he influenced by any such external circumstances, but chose whom he pleased to such an high office; and that he, who of fishermen made them apostles, of a persecutor had made him one also. Or these false teachers perhaps had objected to him, that these valuable men had been with Christ from the beginning, were eyewitnesses of his majesty, heard the doctrines of the Gospel from his lips, and saw his miracles, had had a similar conversation with him, when he was a preacher of much later date, and could not pretend to such advantages, and therefore ought not to be equalled to them: his answer is, that whatever privileges of this kind they had enjoyed, as could not be denied but they were considerable, yet this mattered not, nor did it make any great difference between him and them; he had seen Christ too, though as one born out of due time; had received an immediate commission from him to preach his Gospel, and was appointed an apostle by him as they were, without any respect of persons: and whereas it might have been urged, that these men had entertained different sentiments from him formerly, concerning the observance of the law, he signifies he had nothing to do with that, to their own master they stood, to whom they must give an account, who, without respect of persons, will render to every man according to his works. This is how to understand it, pls don't read anything else into it in order not to pile great sin upon yourself. Its clear that Paul and the apostles preached the same Gospel!!!!! The same. There is no difference. Repent therefore. Shalom

[@faithtoken5010]

VERY well laid out. Holy spirit is all over this. Thank you!

[@SlingOfDavid9000]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eWPTd42Jp855mK8

[@bible1st]

Do not be decieved.

[@Eye_Witness]

This understanding of Paul seems to be growing in recent years and I can see it is being moved from a backburner to the front of the stove. It will be interesting to see how it develops in time to come. The subject should not be considered anathema. If Paul's Apostleship or lack thereof cannot hold up under scrutiny, so be it. Many twist his words to their own destruction. The question is, which way are they twisting it? Blessings, all.

[@anomilumiimulimona2924]

14:01 great point, what was the point of Peters vision? The more we have fellowship with one an other, the more we reveal truth.

[@tamarenwhite5482]

As YAH was leading me to all sorts of truth this year the Ruach led me to start observing the law, but then I got really really confused with Paul's teachings. Then the Ruach reminded me of a documentary I watched three years prior in where Yahushua called Judas "you thirteenth spirit" and asked him why have you come here. It shocked me and I did not want to believe that the Word of Yah could have been messed with this badly, so I seeked for ways to prove Paul right. But your videos has just confirmed what the Ruach revealed. Prays YAH!

[@therighteousrighthand]

No where in scriptures is Judas called the "13th spirit". Please make sure to live in obedience to Yeshua. John 5:23 "That kol Bnei Adam may honor HaBen as they honor HaAv. The one not honoring HaBen does not honor HaAv who sent him [Dan 7:13-14]."

[@ghettostarmusic7840]

Paul was a liar

[@therighteousrighthand]

@@ghettostarmusic7840 and you?

[@ghettostarmusic7840]

@@therighteousrighthand ?

[@ghettostarmusic7840]

Read Acts 9:7, + 22:7-9 and Acts 26:14 .. May the truth set us all free.

[@truthseeking.mission]

All the distorted teachings of the original sin, the atonement, the sin inheritance, speaking in tongues, and the salvation by faith alone are not taught by Jesus but taught by Paul. Paul was not educated by Jesus, he appointed himself as an apostle and he claimed to be superior to the disciples. “I do not think I am in the least inferior to those "super-apostles" 2 Corinthians 11:5 Paul wanted to compete against the Disciples as written in 2 Corinthians 11: 5, 2 Corinthians 11: 13 Galatians 1: 7-8, Galatians 2: 6-8, Galatians 2: 11 and 1 Timothy 1: 7, Philippians 3: 2, 3: 19, 2 Corinthians 11: 22-23. “For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ”. 2 Corinthians 11:13 “only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!” Galatians 1:7-8 “But when Peter came to Antioch, I had to oppose him to his face, for what he did was very wrong”. Galatians 2:11 “They want to be teachers of the law, but they do not know what they are talking about or what they so confidently affirm”. 1 Timothy 1:7 “Beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers, beware of the false circumcision; for we are the true circumcision”. Philippians 3:2 Apostle St. James (brother of Jesus) tried to correct Paul's errors. Examples are verses James 3: 1, James 3: 14-17, James 4: 11 as an attempt to correct Paul's error in Galatians 3:10. James 4:17 is a warning of Paul's error in Romans 7:19 St. James wanted to correct the erroneous teachings of Paul, the verses of James 2: 14-25 provide corrections to the teachings of Paul in Romans 3:28, Ephesians 2: 8-9, Galatians 2:16 Paul did not teach the verses of obedience like Deuteronomy 6: 4-9, 11:18-20, 11:26-28, 32:46-47, 30:15-16, 30: 19, Leviticus 18: 4-5. Those teachings have been confirmed by Jesus in Matthew 22: 35-40, Luke 10: 25-28, Mark 12: 28-34. Instead of those verses, Paul taught the distorted teachings like Ephesians 2: 8-9, Ephesians 2: 5, Romans 3: 28 Galatians 2: 16, Galatians 3:10 Paul did not teach the basic teachings like Matthew 7:21-27, Luke 10: 25-28, Matthew 25: 35-45, Mark 12: 28-34, Luke 13: 25-27, Matthew 25: 35-45, Mark 10: 17-19, Matthew 19: 16-19, Luke 18: 18-21, Luke 6: 46-48, John 14:15, John 14:21. Instead of those basic teachings that are in line with the teachings of the prophets, he taught the distorted teachings as Romans 8:30, Romans 3:28 Paul did not teach the strict teachings of Jesus such as Matthew 18: 9, Matthew 5:29, Mark 9:47, but taught the attractive teachings such as Ephesians 1: 4, 2 Thessalonians 2: 13, 1 Thessalonians 5:9, 1 Corinthians 15:51, 2 Timothy 1: 9, Romans 5: 1, and Romans 5: 9 We will find in Paul's teachings what is contrary to the teachings of Christ and the Prophets because he wanted to please Jews and Gentiles and attract more people as he said in 1 Corinthians 9: 20-21 and in 1 Corinthians 10:33 “And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; To them that are without law, as without law, that I might gain them that are without law”. “Even as I please all men in all things”. 1 Corinthians 10:33 True teachers do not try to satisfy all people; they only teach the harsh truth. When the scribes wanted to support the doctrine of atonement, they have added verses like Matthew 18:11 For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost The bible footnotes explain that verse Matthew 18:11 was not in the original old scriptures Hebrews 9:22 “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness” is a misunderstanding of verse Leviticus 17:10-14 which is not about atonement but is about dietary laws. God has clarified that blood in meat is not good for health; that clarification was necessary to the people who did not have advanced medical tools to know that eating the meat with the blood still in it is bad for health The true word of God is not what is written by the unknown writer of Hebrews; it is what has been taught by Moses, David, Solomon, Isaiah, Jesus and the Prophets who taught the forgiveness is possible by obedience, repentance, and prayers Proverbs 16:6 teaches that “In mercy and truth atonement is provided for iniquity.” Psalm 69:30-31 teaches that praise worship is better than sacrifice 2 Chronicles 7:14 teaches that forgiveness is obtainable without a blood sacrifice ‘If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves, and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin’ Jonah 3 teaches that people are forgiven when they repented and fasted, without offering any sacrifice and without shedding any blood Proverbs 17:15 states: ‘He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the righteous, both of them alike are an abomination unto God’ That should be considered as a warning to the teachers who promise free salvation to the sinners and who teach that the innocent has been punished on behalf of the sinners Jesus taught the parable of The Prodigal Son in Luke 15:11-32 to highlight the importance of obedience and repentance as the main prerequisites for salvation That is the core Christianity teaching as taught in Matthew 7:21 Not every one that said to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that does the will of my Father which is in heaven Jesus has confirmed the teachings of the Old Testimony ‘in repentance and obedience is your salvation’ as taught in Isaiah 30:15 In Matthew 25:31-45 Jesus described the final judgment as being based on good works; he clarified that those who obey the law will be saved Salvation is not based solely on belief and nothing else; salvation is not granted to those who merely profess acceptance of Jesus without performing kind or compassionate deeds In Luke 13:3 and 13:5, Jesus taught that repentance is necessary for salvation But unless you repent, you too will all perish Mark 12:33 teaches: And to love one’s neighbor as himself, is much more than all burnt offerings and sacrifices What Jesus taught here is not different from the wisdom taught by the old testimony Hosea 6:6 ‘For I desire mercy and not sacrifice, And the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings’ That verse teaches us that forgiveness is possible by repentance and obedience; no sacrifice is necessary Matthew 9:13 teaches that Jesus came to call the sinner to repentance ‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice, for I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance’ The wrong teachings about original sin, atonement, and salvation by grace without obedience to God’s law were taught by Paul who was not educated by Jesus. An example of Paul’s contradicting teachings is also found in Romans 2:13 versus Romans 3:20 - (what he taught in Romans 3 contradicted what he taught in Romans 2) “For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified”. Romans 2:13 “Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified” Romans 3:20

[@kimwestwood8840]

Paul opposed Peter because he was using favoritism and being hypocritical. Peter called Paul a beloved brother. Paul did NOT teach against the commandments or the laws, BUT taught that KEEPING the commandments does not save us nor do we receive the Holy Spirit by keeping the law. When Peter preached his first message look at all the people who BELIEVED in Jesus and got filled with the Holy Spirit... If you remove the testimony of Paul you may as well throw out John. John 3, 6, 10, and 1 John 3 to be exact...

[@strikemaster1]

A blind man can see that the 10 commandments alone cannot save anyone... even Christ taught that... it is no secrete. But what keeping the 10 commandments does do, it shows Jehovah how sincere you are, which can have a lot to do with how you are blessed. It never ceases to amaze me that of all the bible passages, the only few that God Jehovah wrote with His own hand, are the very passages that 99% of the world refuse to keep in entirety.

[@kimwestwood8840]

@@strikemaster1 My experience with the Father and other true believers is that because we have the Holy Spirit, we have the desire to walk in His ways. But we do it out of reverence and to be blessed to have a full life enabling us to be His witnesses to the real Messiah. With that being said, we are in the new blood covenant and with grace have been justified by faith, not obedience. Only one was fully obedient that we, through His finished and complete work, could be reconciled back to the Father..

[@strikemaster1]

@@kimwestwood8840 justified by faith, not obedience you say? Even Satan has faith... but is a liar. If you have faith, then you are obedient. If you are not obedient, your faith cannot never justify you, and as The Lord says (not Paul), I never knew you.

[@kimwestwood8840]

@@strikemaster1 I never offer my opinions, but point to scripture. satan has faith? in what? His pride and hatred of God and Christians and mankind separated him from God forever. The enemy's fate is sealed, his end is the lake of fire. Heres Peter's statement about faith.. 1 Peter 1: 3" Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His abundant mercy has begotten us again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4 to an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled and that does not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, 5 who are kept by the power of God through faith for salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. ( kept by the power of faith... faith and eternal security is a beautiful thing..) 6 In this you greatly rejoice, though now for a little while, if need be, you have been grieved by various trials, 7 that the genuineness of your faith, being much more precious than gold that perishes, though it is tested by fire, may be found to praise, honor, and glory at the revelation of Jesus Christ, 8 whom having not seen you love. Though now you do not see Him, yet believing, you rejoice with joy inexpressible and full of glory, 9 receiving the end of your faith-the salvation of your souls." This particular salvation Peter speaks of is our redemption , not the born again experience of being saved. And again here is eternal security for the true believer... In context in John 3 Jesus explaining to Nicodemus we must be born again to enter the kingdom of God. . He further explains how. 14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up, 15 that whoever believes in Him should [c]not perish but have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved. 18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." That is Jesus' words. Not Paul's since you obviously reject Paul as an apostle .. I dont deny obedience is important as I commented before. Paul never denied obedience. But he preached Christ crucified. Twice Jesus tells us those who believe in Him shall never perish but have eternal life. This is the gospel of salvation.. Matthew 7 tells of a group of people bragging about all their good works. Jesus says I never knew you. Their works versus the power of the cross? They were religious, but false converts..I received the Holy Spirit 28 years ago, but not because of my obedience, but because I believed in the death, burial, and resurrection of the Messiah. His Spirit testifies with my spirit Salvation and discipleship are 2 entirely different things.

[@kimwestwood8840]

@@strikemaster1 There are many verses about the word faith. Jesus is the author, developer, and finisher of our faith. This morning the Father showed me another verse about faith spoken by Peter. Acts 10 :43 "To Him ( Jesus) all the prophets witness that, through His name, whoever believes in Him will receive remission of sins.” To put in context, Peter here is addressing Cornelius and his family about Jesus. To believe in Him . Only the Father draws people to an encounter with the risen Messiah. Believing in Him, trusting Him, is the gift. God bless

[@staza1]

The reason this speaker, and so many people in the comments are so confused is because they don't know how to rightly divide the word of Truth. There is no way to get around the fact that Jesus and his apostles taught many things that were completely opposite to what Paul taught. For example: James: "You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone." James 2:24 Paul: “A person is justified by faith apart from works..." Romans 3:28 Jesus: "The scribes and Pharisees are seated in the chair of Moses. Therefore do whatever they tell you, and observe it." Matthew 23:1 Paul: "The former law is set aside because it was weak and useless" Hebrews 7:18 Jesus: “... go, show yourself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded" Matthew 8:4 Paul: "But now we have been released from the law, since we have died to what held us, so that we may serve in the newness of the Spirit and not in the old letter of the law." Romans 7:6 How about when someone outright asked Jesus how to be saved in Matthew 19:16: Just then someone came up and asked him, “Teacher, what good must I DO to have eternal life?” Did Jesus answer this man by explaining "the gospel" that Paul teaches us to him in 1 Corinthians 15, wish is explained here: Paul: Now I want to make clear for you, brothers and sisters, the gospel I preached to you,... by which you are being saved... that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, [4] that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures" 1 Corinthians 15 Did Jesus answer by explaining that you don't need to do anything. You just need to believe in my death burial and resurrection? No, Jesus didn't explain Paul's gospel to this man. (How could he? He hadn't died on the cross yet!) No, instead, Jesus answered this crucial question by commanding him to FOLLOW THE LAW OF MOSES TO BE SAVED. Jesus said to him “... If you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.” Matthew 19:16-17 So here's the question: was Jesus talking to you here? If so, are you obeying this command of Jesus? If not, why are you disobeying Jesus by not following all the Moses laws? So, I ask you, will you take the first step toward honestly studying the word of truth, and at least admit that the teachings of Jesus and the apostles were sometimes very different, and even opposite to one another? Trying to claim all these messages are the same, is like trying to say that up is down and down is up. And these are not trivial matters. They get right to the heart of how we are justified, saved, and made righteous before God. We CANNOT follow all these teachings. It is literally impossible, because loving by faith and grace is the opposite to following the law. So we had better figure out who's words we should live by, Jesus, our Lord and savior, and his 12 apostles, or Paul, the apostle to the gentiles. These contradictions have perplexed, confused, and frustrated pastors, theologians, and anyone trying to read and study the Bible for 2000 years. Luther was so frustrated, he said the book of James doesn't even belong in the Bible. I''m sure he thought the same thing about the book of John which was also very legalistic in nature. After studying scripture for 30 years, and listening to many different pastors and theologians discuss this issue, i began to see that everyone was trying to spin these contradictions to make it appear as if they are all saying the same thing. I understand why. We Christians desperately need to believe that the Bible is 100% true and 100% accurate. If anyone starts claiming there are contradictions, it shakes our faith to the core, because it feels like we can no longer trust what we are reading. I get it. I'm right there with you. And I held on for the long as I could. Until I got to the point where I was ready to give up on scripture because of these contradictions. I realized I cared more about truth than I did holding on to my own need for security. I could no longer pretend that there were no contradictions in the Bible. But then I discovered something truly shocking and amazing. I learned how to "rightly divide the word of Truth" , as Paul instructs us to in 2 Tim 2:15: "Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." I began to learn that throughout history, from the very early days of the church, there were those that tried to teach us how important it was to rightly divide the scripture in order to understand it properly. For instance, in 400AD, Augustine wrote: "Distinguish the ages and the scriptures harmonize" The shocking truth God led me to see was that Jesus, James, Peter and John taught a different gospel to jews, than Paul taught to us gentiles (non Jews). I am not alone in this belief. For the past 2000 years, there has always been a snag remnant of true believers who understood these truths. The reason you don't read or hear about these people is because the Roman Catholic church gruesomely murdered anyone who dared speak these truths, and burned any of their writings. But thankfully, in the last few centuries, as Rome's absolute grip on the minds of men has been forcefully released, a theological framework called dispensationalism has grown to be a prominent view of scripture. When Jesus teaches to obey the law of Moses, he's not talking to us. We simply recognize that Jesus was himself born under the law, and was talking to Jews under the law, before the cross and before Grace. Jesus WAS talking to us through Paul when it comes to instructing us as to how we are saved and justify and how we should live our life as gentiles grafted in and adopted into His family. The theological framework called mid-acts dispensationalism simply takes this concept to its natural conclusions throughout the rest of the Bible. Consider the following: While Jesus was alive, he spoke and ministered only to jews. In fact he clearly stated that he came only for the Jews and not the gentiles Mat 24. (In fact, in Mat 24, he ignored a non Jewish lady asking him for help and told her it would be wrong to take the children's food and feed it to dogs, because that's what Jews thought of gentiles at the time. And we were dogs, as Paul said we were outside of salvation, with no hope, and only had God's wrath to look forward to.) He clearly taught the Jews to continue to observe the laws of Moses. When he sent his disciples out, he clearly told them to not go to the gentiles but only go to the 12 tribes of Israel. Jesus did this because he knew God's secret plan after his death would be to reveal a new mystery to Paul alone and make Paul the apostle to the gentiles. So given that Jesus appeared directly to Paul and gave him a special Revelation to reveal to us gentiles, we need to listen to Paul when it comes to how to live. If you try to take what Paul says and blend it with what Jesus and the apostles were saying, you are trying to blend two different gospels given it two different time periods to two different audiences. And no this doesn't mean we follow paul. We are following Jesus's commandments given to Paul for us. I know what you're saying right now. You think this is crazy. You're saying that you need to follow the words of christ, not Paul. First off, once again remember that by following the words of paul, you are following the words of Christ. Paul instructs us to follow him as he follows Christ. Secondly, you are saying, "of course all the words of Christ are written to me". Well let me ask you a question: Given that Jesus constantly told people to follow the Moses law, why is it so hard to believe that Jesus was talking to Jews before he died on the cross, and that his words were for Jews under the law and not for us under grace. For 15 years after Jesus's death, Peter, john, and James all continue to practice the moses law, as Jesus instructed them to! Dispensationalists do worship Jesus and still believe his words. The difference is, we believe in jesus' words that he gave to Paul, because those are the words that were meant for us gentiles.

[@antoniopetra6983]

Paul’s writings is not the word of God! That is why it’s hard to understand!

[@staza1]

@@antoniopetra6983 Wrong. You do not have God's spirit loving inside you. That's why YOU can't understand it. Like God says, God's wisdom is foolishness to those living by the flesh.

[@antoniopetra6983]

@@staza1 even Jesus said that the Torah, prophets, writings and his message are authoritative and inspired! Paul saw Satan on the way to Damascus! You’re a m0r0n!

[@EJAY_Contat_Music]

​@@staza1He did help the gentile woman even after he told her he came only for the Jews, that's an important part of the story you left out, I suspect deliberately, in order to create a coherent argument. And that addition completely dismantles your assumption that his message or works were only for the Jews and not sprout out to gentiles. The centurion wasn't Jewish neither. Paul's message is antithetical to Christ's teachings in understanding. You say it yourself then try to forcefully reconcile it again, Christ never talked about the bible, he talked about his words in relation to Jewish law. It's important to discern even throughout the bible. Christ literally claims he's greater than Solomon, implying that his words/wisdim/teachings hold much more infinite depth than even the wisest in Jewish history and possibly human history too, that's a claim! Implying that there are nuances in Christ's teachings that can iron out any discrepancies in Solomon's depth of thought. Paul on the other hand comes in with absolute antithesis, a teaching like you said "affects the core criteria of salvation" Also read Christ's conversation with the Samaritan woman at Jacob's Well, it opens up his plans for understanding his ministry type and inclusion of non Jews.

[@71224]

Thanks. Did you know? 51% of The new testement is only paul's message.. We have to read surely Gospel of the 12 Apostles. It is really amazing!

[@Will-nb8qk]

So you are saying, Paul’s messages make up 51% of the NT. Why don’t we hear gospels from the original 11 apostles.

[@ronaldeglewski3073]

@@Will-nb8qk That is why the bible alone 400 years latter is wrong , the Church followed Tradition , letters given to the Churches and vocally from the 12 Apostles .

[@TrustinJC]

Every word absolutely true. Well done.

[@jgvtc559]

I don't even think its possible for you to repent any more and how many you've dipped your hands in their blood is mindblowing seeing as you were one of the first with this apostasy on yt mass dissemination of this was you You really understand that? Like what kind of hellfire is stoked up for such things? Seriously that false doctrine had me lost for a time so I do fully know what I'm talking about and its utter apostasy Not just that but you disagree with grace so you are already under condemnation and what sacrifice remains without bringing Christ to open shame None Paul was talking to people just like you it's clear why you need to uproot him so you can rest as a tare in the garden But if we toss out Paul we dont have the armor of ephesus. And that's exactly where satan wants the body of Christ defenseless I really hope you understand how deep that hole you're tap dancing over is

[@hamzakhairi4765]

@@jgvtc559 Paul corrupted the teachings of Isa AS and turned him into god sending an entire group of people to hell with Paul leading the charge first of the flame

[@onefodderunit]

As soon as it was declared, "It is finished", the devil went to work preparing Paul to pervert.

[@mlp1211]

lol

[@johnrambo9104]

This man is preaching a false gospel, as Paul addressed it in Galatians as the JUDAIZER CULT! If you follow his incorrect teachings of mixing Old and New Covenants, you will NOT be saved, and are fallen from GRACE (Gal 5:1-5). Paul specifically told them NOT to go back to the LAW, as Christ has completed it for you (Romans says it all). We all will be judged by Paul's gospel as well. Romans 2:16 “In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.” Ignore Paul's directives given to him by Jesus, at your OWN PERIL!

[@SlingOfDavid9000]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eWPTd42Jp855mK8

[@GraceAloneThroughFaithAlone]

Lol

[@wanrazul]

yup paul is a pervert alright...

[@stevenwilliamson3240]

Thank you! Well done! Now those who continue to keep the commandments, can now continue to move at God speed!

[@ElsieDreamWorld]

I’m sorry, I haven’t finished the video but I’m so upset, because I always thought Paul had stolen the True Church of Christ from those who had been chosen by the Lord, and now you explain it how it’s really very clear Paul went against the twelve. Ver angry but very thankful to you.

[@lovefortruth3414]

Be c angry, but also rejoice, because now you are free from obligation to follow Paul. You can dig more into the Gospels and the books written by and on behalf of the real apostles (hint: not all of them are in the church-approved canons of Scripture, but they confirm everything taught in the OT and in the Gospels.

[@ronaldeglewski3073]

Jesus promised 12 seats in Heaven to the twelve Apostles not 13 seats , Peter stood up in front of everyone and said did not Jesus give me the authority to preach to the Gentiles .

[@BrentKrohn]

​@@lovefortruth3414yeah they might confirm the old testament. But do they confirm the actual Hebrew Bible and it's true meaning? No, it's not even close. Don't take my word for it. Dig deeper. Then dig deeper after that. Follow the evidence not the theology or church doctrine. Follow all the historical evidence. I promise you the problem with Paul is only the tip of the iceberg when you begin deconstructing. Peace ✌️

[@aaronvw81]

Peter found out that Paul was not telling the converts to not eat meat sacrificed to idols and demons.

[@joeepps9209]

study the characteristics of a narcissistic person then read paul's wrings

[@followeroftheway4325]

Exactly. Sha'ul is the picture of narcissism.

[@narcissistinjurygiver2932]

narcissism is how demons act.

[@followeroftheway4325]

Tom Bladecki You can have him. But the act of not heeding warnings, not even considering them, is the folly of men. You have your ability to choose, but you also have the ability to search this matter out, considering the warnings. I hope that you can bring yourself to that.

[@strikemaster1]

@@followeroftheway4325 Very nicely put. It is amazing how a few little trees can hide a whole forest for some. Wink wink nudge nudge say no more :-)

[@duffgordon9005]

He gave ALL the glory and praise- to Jesus Christ. In his sermons , Paul was inclusive, preaching the Gospel entrusted to him without do this do that,. Rather trust that Christ has done this. YIOU ARE WRONG- James, the Just was the narcissist, could not even see the favoritism showed to him./ Yet preached against partiality while he flew over 80 men !! Plus there is no mention of any power the way Paul , Today- the HATED ONE - I bet you hate sola fide

[@Elisha-z5q]

How can I sign up for your website?

[@think-islam-channel]

As a muslim I applaud you for honesty on this topic

[@ThetennisDr]

As a born again Christian with the holy Spirit inside of m.i tell you Jesus is God and peter was Satan. Today prob trump is Satan. Jesus is God

[@mjolnir9855]

Please don’t pretend you care about honesty. You’re only happy to see an opposition undermined. Your religion is the epitome of corruption and evil as evidenced by how many more your religion corrupts and radicalizes. If Sharia was law you’d be first on the bandwagon to chop off the heads of apostates and murder any homosexual you find. Your scriptures has Pharaoh threatening Moses with crucifixion (something that didn’t exist until 500 b.c.), the sun going down IN a murky pond, and Muhammad raping his child bride Aisha. Use the logic used in this vid and start applying it to your own messed up theology.

[@danaleanne38]

I pray you will take the next step and follow Yeshua and not Allah.

[@think-islam-channel]

@@danaleanne38 God forbid : that's idolatry and earns the wrath of God. May you worship God alone one day.

[@MuhammadAliKhan-gi2rr]

​@@danaleanne38God is not a man. Bible. No man has seen god. Bible. Plz rethink your religion

[@platzhirsch4275]

Acts 15:7 doesn't mean that only Peter was chosen to "go to the Gentiles". That's a complete miss representation of scripture. Pls don't do that...Next the circumcision issue with Paul vs Peter is not a disagreement at all. Peter and James with Paul clearly stated that they preach the same Gospel but naturally the circumcision issue became a point of discussion later but didn't mean that Paul was now preaching a different Gospel. That's very untrue. Naturally a jew who comes to the messiah has a different stand to Torah laws than a Gentile and Paul was right that a Gentile did not have to obey these laws. Paul had his knowledge through the Holy Spirit and was blessed with that knowledge.

[@inthenamemosthigh]

Paul/ Saul was not an apostle Mattias was elected 12 in acts 1... Paul made Christianity and finished in Rome.. Genesis17 exodus12 Joshua 5 numbers9 John 7 : 23

[@rodlancaster6431]

you are mistaken

[@jenaloha949]

@@rodlancaster6431 no he isn't.

[@uriarteunited3105]

Paul made christianity but persecuted Christian's before he converted....so how could he have made it😭 stupid

[@paulrock4816]

@@uriarteunited3105 over & over again Paul was called an Apostle to the gentiles. Galatians 2:7-9 he received the right hand of fellowship with the 12 Apostles & told you have the gentiles we will stay with the Jews. Which they did until their deaths. Peter backed Paul's gospel of grace in Acts 15:7-11 & in 2 Peter 3:15,16. Paul brought the gospel to pagan gentiles who might otherwise never get that chance. Even when the Jews were scattered under persecution, they taught Jew only. Acts 11:19. They had no intention of going to the gentile. I think scripture showed after Peter to Cornelus you don't hear much of the 12 going to the gentiles. One time with Philip in Samaritans. (So much for the first Pope.) Peter.

[@Hebrew42Day]

@@paulrock4816 Over and over again by WHOM? "I do not lie, I am an apostle." "Believe me, I am not lying."

[@WayOfHaQodesh]

What do you make of the prophecy in Yirmeyahu 31:31 and also the New/Renewed Covenant ie Beriyt Chadasha that Messiah Yahushua instated at his Passover meal with his 12 apostles?

[@camaradael2424]

Paul was a bogus. He was always defending himself even if no one was against him. His writing always have defense mechanism.

[@paulrock4816]

Peter backed Paul Acts 15:7-11 2 Peter 3:15,16

[@camaradael2424]

@@paulrock4816 coz the scriptures were fabricated in favor of saul of tarsus. But acts and epistles of james evidently speak of a so-called apostle that had disagreements with the disciples, the self-proclaimed apostle saul.

[@camaradael2424]

@Reflect Upon The Word you know, i always used to accuse others that when i was a pastor. But now, after exploring 16 different religions with sincere intentions of finding the reality of the claims of religion and god, i realized i have been very judgmental before to others who dont believe the so-called word of god. Well, that's what you are right now, so i understand you. Btw, what if i say i believe the scriptures and god and jesus AGAIN now, but if i say i do according to Catholic faith, would that be alright with you? 🤔 Hmmmm, i dont think so. You will still say the same. Because for you, unless that only the evangelical faith is the truth. Btw, the bible you now cling to which you bought from an evangelical bookstore, was originally written by catholic monks before the reformation took place. And btw, aside from being a pastor, i also was a catholic seminarian in my teens.

[@charlesurdy-barnes413]

2 Peter 3:15 has been proven (scholaryly) to have not been written by Peter. Peter was dead when it was written, so this was obviously someone trying to cover for Paul. We have no records of Peter in harmony with Paul. Anyone that prefaces himself by saying, "I am not lying", very possibly even very likely lying. No prophet ever had to say that

[@duffgordon9005]

Robert Eisemann speculates that James was the "opposition Priest" - WHICH EXPLAINS HIS odd power over the others as in Acts 15 (Speaking AFTER there had been agreement )(silence means an agreement had been reached that NOTHING should be placed on the Antioch Gentile believers..BUT!!! let's throw these four in -just to cover our bases. "AS IF THEY DID NOT KNOW FORNICATION WAS WRONG!! So I can see Paul getting sick over the exceptions as he believes the LAW INCREASES SIN! "One should NOT speak against the high priest" May explain why Paul bit his tongue against this FAVORED brother of Jesus, who preaches AGAINST FAVORITISM! I think James was an anathema to Paul and remains that to those of us cannot explain away James 2:21 with Romans 4:5...

[@mikefrady7965]

Duff Gordon apostle Paul put Peter in his place because he was an error and Peter knew it so he repented and they got along just fine after that Read the book of Galatians and maybe you’ll understand something about not putting your faith in the law because of putting your faith in Jesus Christ so that he did not die in vain

[@carchibald9322]

Its actually very easy to reconcile those passages. READ James 2:21 and take it in context. Faith that doesn't produce love isn't saving faith. Demons have "faith" and shudder.

[@duffgordon9005]

@@carchibald9322 WRONG SArchibald and everyone who tries to put these two ways of salvation into a false reconciliation. BTW do you know when James talks about demons "believing" DOES NOT USE THE GREEK for head knowledge. Did you know he uses pisteo which is trust, reliance upon-SAVING FAITH- now how do you make sense of that inconvenient truth < Also James 2:21 cannot be reconciled with Paul. or ANY of scripture =For anyone else as James makes his own reality up with NO other source-- 2:21-- Was not our ancestor Abraham justified by works when he offered his son Isaac on the altar?? No James I do NOT!! Because I researched God's words and He says nothing about justifying James rather that He will bless him.. AND WHY WOULD GOD MENTION JUSTIFICATION when in Genesis 15 . God announces in legal terms that "Abraham was justified" James is trying to make the Christian salvation road as never ending battle on whether one "justifies God's earlier justification" !! NO THX! This is what the RCC hangs on to make its case that it is a sin to say one KNOWS he has been justified . This is Paul's knock out punch: "BUT WHEN ONE DOES NOT WORK, YET BELIEVES IN THE ONE WHO JUSTIFIES THE UNGODLY ,HIS FAITH IS CREDITED as RIGHTEOUSNESS" Romans 4:5 THE RC New american Bible. When one who DOES NOT WORK..."continual present" Paul has NO works EVER related to God "justifying (a one time annoucement by God) Paul's "Romans " was never not considered Scripture , But who hear knows when James was finally let in?? IMO there is a battle between James and Paul. God chose to have Iscariot in the twelve- so who are we to say that God could be testing us that his brother preached a false gospel?

[@jeanben2176]

@@carchibald9322 Hi Archibald, just one observation, a biblical one, demons have no faith, Hebrews 11 verse 1 is very clear about it. Demons do not have faith because they are able to see literally God, they used to be in his presence before satan rebelled, do you remember that part of scripture? now as far as james 2 verse 22 you are right, James talks there about obedience if we have faith in our heart we obey but it comes a time when we are not so perfect and God sees it and justifies you even if you do not have works, [ by faith solo ]do you remember the parable of the pharisee and the tax collector? he was confesing he fasted he gave the tenth, he had works but he didnot have faith, he did not have humbolness, he was not justified, this is jesus talking. well , in Romans 4 verse 5 paul talks about being justified by faith, lets remember king David, I have to state that David lived under the law of Moses do you remember that he sinned big time and Nathan the prophet went to him and rebuked him? King David repented and God justified him and did not killed him, please read psalm 51, it was his confession and evidence that there are circunstances when we do not have works but we have faith in his mercy, Praise the Lord is by faith because is written by faith the righteous shall live, righeous in the sense of believing in the works of Jesus the man. Well have a great day, comments are welcome

[@jesseljones4991]

“James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.” ‭‭James‬ ‭1:1‬ ‭KJV‬‬

[@ruthbates9549]

I was blessed to see my matriarchal genealogy recently. My great-great grandfather's name was Matthias Doubt! A message through time from my great great great grandmother! It didn't mean anything to me years ago, but this time I understood loud and clear! Just wanted to share that incredible experience! At least I found it striking! Powerful!

[@jessgarcia4031]

Im relieved to hear your words And i concur most brethren wont or will not receive this i feel they worship an idol And not YAHUAH

[@Hebrew42Day]

No they won't because they didn't listen to YHWH. They opened the door of their heart to the idol.

[@yahyaelmi8435]

Did you read about Islam . Quran is the last book sent from God it follows the same message Jesus and Moses preached “the oneness of God “

[@ShemaHaTorah]

Paul is mentioned in Revelation by John (to the Church that John took over from Paul, Ephesus). " I know that you cannot tolerate wicked men, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false." Rev 2:2

[@danaleanne38]

John already had a church in Ephesus. John and Mary moved there .

[@mikebarnes7734]

Paul was an imposter because Jesus chose Peter not only as an apostle but also as his successor. The genuine disciples of Jesus had spent about three years with their Master. It is ironic that so much of the N.T. is attributed to Paul who never spent any time with Jesus. It is revealing that Paul was at odds with Peter and other disciples. So did Paul aka Saul undermine the followers of Jesus by asserting his own beliefs and theology ? Most importantly, did Paul inaugurate a religion of which Jesus would have been opposed, since he had disdain for organized religion?

[@mikebarnes7734]

@@KeepingWatch95 Wow ! You've nailed it from the biblical perspective. Credible sources like Sufi Mystic Rumi;'s Masnavi and John M Allegro's * The Sacred Mushroom,,....,"and in his translation of "The Dead Sea Scrolls" seem to reveal a Paul with the ongoing personalty of Saul. His apparent conversion facilitated his infiltration into the gatherings of early believers.

[@realzhella6817]

Peter is not his Successor lol...Jesus gave 12 thrones to all twelve apostles. All 12 of them are his successors

[@mikebarnes7734]

@@realzhella6817 When you say "thrones," do you mean that they have each got what we used to call water closets?

[@realzhella6817]

@@mikebarnes7734 no they each have their own thrones in heaven with continuation of Apostolic authority over the various churches they established. For example st. Bartholomew for the armenian orthodox church, St. Thomas for the Indian Orthodox Church, St. Peter for the syriac Orthodox Church and so on

[@theophilos0910]

‘Judas’ is the name of (3) disciples - Yehudah bar Shimeon Ish-keryiah (Judas son of Simon the Bursar, ‘the man who hands out’ whose title was after the crucifixion later changed to ‘Ish-Keryiota’ = ‘the man who handed-over’ I.e. betrayed), Yehudah bar Yosef haTomah (Judas son of Joseph called Didymos Thomas ‘the Twin’ I.e. body-double) and Yehudah haLevi (‘Judas the Levite’ aka Theudas or ‘Thaddeus Lebbaeus’) - so when it comes to naming ‘the 12’ it can get confusing … This is especially difficult when only ‘Matthew’ is listed as one of the 12 in the gospel that bears his name (Luke & Mark has ‘Levi’ instead) - since Luke-Acts chapter 1 has a ‘Matathiah’ chosen to replace Ish-Keryiota by lots it is possible that this ‘replacement disciple’ was the same ‘Matthew’ that ‘collected the Oracles of the Lord (messiah-prophecies) in Hebrew letters and thus the rest of them had to translate and interpret them as best they could…’ [Bishop Papias of Smyrna c. 95 CE quoted by Eusebeius in his Ecclesiastical History c. 325 CE] At least this would account for ‘Matthew’s’ refrain ‘now this was done to fulfill what was spoken by the prophet so-and-so’ in the first gospel that bears his name - this replacement disciple apparently could read & write to a certain extent (was he a tax-collector?) unlike the illiterate Galilean fishermen-disciples that Jesus chose ‘to be with him’… But to address the rift that existed between the strict-Torah-abiding Daviddic brother of Jesus and that ‘heretical’ upstart nobody (‘Shaoul of Tarsus’ who was born in Greek speaking Cilicia in present-day Turkey) who never even met ‘Jesus’ in person (let alone heard him preach) only in dreams and visions like my gardener…) is a thorny problem for the church that often gets band-aided over by ‘Pauline gentile antiTorah antiCircumcision Christians’ but a close-reading of the mangled Greek hand copied texts of Matthew & the Book of Revelation seems to indicate Jesus promoted strict Torah observance along the lines of James his brother - See the two swipes at Paul we can discern in Revelation 2:9 & 3:9 ‘Pay no heed to those men walking about claiming to be ‘Judaean-born’ or ‘Apostles’ but are nothing of the kind whatsoever - for they are in fact Liars & Deceivers of the Synagogue of Satan !’ James the Just was the Daviddic blood-brother of Jesus and even though he himself was not a disciple he immediately took-over as head of the Yahadim in Jerusalem by virtue of his Daviddic blood-even ‘Shaoul of Tarsus aka ‘Paul’ had to report to him although very unwillingly (Acts tells the story of James sending out sours to report back on what ‘Paul’ was preaching to uncircumcised gentile ‘god-fearers’ before being angrily summoned to Jerusalem to explain himself to James ‘and the Council of Elders’ - but Paul’s ego wouldn’t stand for a brow-beating and wrote angrily to the Galatians ‘so I decided on my own to travel to Jerusalem to meet with those who considered themselves leaders there - after receiving a vision in a dream…’ see Galatians 2:2 The vitriol later in Galatians chapter 2 reveals the snide jealousy he had of Jesus’ own Daviddic family & his original Galilean followers (‘and those ‘so-call’d Pillars’, James [bar-Zavdai] and John [his brother] and [Simon Peter] ‘Kefah’ the latter of whom he met later at Antioch and called him an hypocrite & told-off right to his face… It’s time the writings attributed to ‘that heretic Paul’ were relegated to the Appendix of Christian New Testament bibles so those who wish to study the ideas of the earliest nszorean messianists beginning with Jesus’ oracles in the gospels and including ‘the epistles of James’ & ‘the epistle of Jude’ and ‘Revelation’ to get back to true orthodoxy with respect to the earliest kerygma of the ‘church’ .

[@gospeltrax2513]

We have the written endorsement of Paul by Peter - with a warning that Paul's writings are "difficult to understand" and "many people twist what he wrote". So, we should stay within these guidelines and not go against what Peter is saying. As well, we must be careful not to reject Paul, if in fact he was chosen by Yeshua, as the NT explains - Paul was chosen by Yeshua directly. So, are we in a position to carelessly ignore this fact - or even deny it - when the evidence does suggest it is absolutely true. Also, Paul proved himself as the real deal by the way he carried out his ministry and ultimately giving up his own life for the cause. There are many extremely important things revealed in Paul's writings, including shedding some light on the End Times. We need to properly interpret Paul - rather than try to paint a picture that he "was not one of the 12" (which is true) but once again, if Yeshua personally hand-picked Paul - as it is written - and there is significant evidence to suggest the story to be true - then it is better to deal with Paul's writings the way Peter told us - rather than inventing a case against Paul, that he should be totally rejected and ignored. Your approach is actually contrary to Scripture. You are going against both Yeshua and Peter by your position. We need to stay within the framework of the Holy Bible. You are in opposition to what we have in the Bible, therefore you are to be rebuked and corrected, and you need to repent of your way of thinking.

[@dennissavage4007]

It wasn't only Paul who taught the Gentiles, Thomas went to India other Apostles to other Gentile nations. Remember, the Holy Spirit gave them different languages of understanding during his descent in Jerusalem. So, a misunderstanding only Paul was involved with the Gentiles. You check out these facts, that disappointing Christian teachers are not revealing these truths.

[@johnspartan98]

Acts 21:24: Paul agrees to the vow but he was never allowed to carry it through to the end. It is reasonable to assume God intervened to prevent Paul from looking like a hypocrite. Paul was a people pleaser in the beginning.....he would later learn it is better to please God than men. The 12 preached to Jews. They erred in treating Gentiles the same as Jews. They should have treated Jewish believers the same as Gentiles once they became aware of Paul's Gospel....but they didn't. They kept pushing their Jewish laws and customs on to the Gentiles. Paul's Gospel makes no distinction. Jews are required to become like Gentiles in order to be saved....which is why very few Jews have become saved since before 70 A.D.. They are generally too proud to become like Gentiles in order to be saved. God cut them off because of their own rejection of Him, His Messiah, and His Gospel of the Kingdom. Romans 11:11.

[@duffgordon9005]

Interesting- Eisemann speculates that James had power as the opposition priest, which follows why Paul bit his tongue when wanting to get in James' face "thou shall not speak against the Priest"

[@johnspartan98]

@@duffgordon9005 James had Jewish pride. That's why the struggle recorded in Acts. When James asked Paul to accept the vow he was doing so under the guise of saving Paul from certain death. So the question comes to mind....why didn't the 12 face certain death? Why only Paul? Well, the answer is the 12 preached faith plus works of the Jewish law to Jews....and that means CIRCUMCISION, while Paul said circumcision of the flesh is meaningless. Paul said true circumcision is circumcision of the heart which is done by the spirit off God in the believer. James was literally preaching Jewish legalism so he had nothing to fear......but he should have defended Paul, not ask him to take a vow. And who were all those people who James thought would Kill Paul? They were Jewish believers.....that's who. They all failed to accept that God was turning to the Gentiles because Israel had rejected the Gospel over and over again in the Book of Acts. Paul tried preaching the Kingdom to the Jews early on, but they rejected it so he said he would no longer go to the Jews and went only to the Gentiles. Any Jews that heard Paul preach were subsequent to his preaching to the Gentiles a Gospel he received sometime between Acts 13 and Acts 15.....and it's not the same Gospel as the 12 preached to Jews.

[@elisyah7779]

Paul is not the same as the 12 Apostles. They were called to preach the gospel that Jesus preached to all nations and to make disciples of every creature under heaven. In Acts 9 Paul is called to gentiles (and the northern tribes dwelling with them but not Jews) and their kings. Sometime later Paul is recommissioned and sent far away to the gentiles only. He is to preach only to people who were not under the law. Gal. 2 is proof that the Ministry develops along these lines. Paul preaches to gentiles Peter and the 12 to Jews, those under the Law. As for the vow, the Holy Spirit had told Paul not to speak to Jews. He was not qualified as his message would cause confusion. Read Isaiah 24. When no one keeps the Law the Earth will burn. When they remove the handwriting of ordinances the Holy Spirit says God will topple the earth. So any jew listening to Isaiah would reject Paul. In Acts 9 Paul was commissioned to go to the gentiles to preach and God might allow him to be captured but the promise was he would always be set free. But his life did not end this way. Acts 28 ends with him under house arrest because he breaks covenant and preaches to Jews after the holy Spirit warned him not to go. Tradition has it he was killed by Nero a gentile. Impossible if Acts 9 is to be believed. Think about it though. Jesus never preached the gospel that Paul preached. But Paul prays that whosoever preaches any other gospel other than the one he preached, let him be eternally damned. What does that say about Jesus'message in Matt. 23:1-3?

[@johnspartan98]

@@elisyah7779 In know that....and I am glad you do too.

[@jeanben2176]

That is totoally correct John! blessed those who have eyes and see and those who have ears and listen! If Paul had been the same Paul as he was after 30 years as an apostle when obeyed James about the vow I am sure he hadnot consented in doing that, James and the elders were acting cleverly but years later Paul was the Paul that was supposed to be. have a great day

[@ironchad5656]

I’m of two schools of thought currently. 1: Paul was genuinely trying to bring the religion of Jesus (not Christianity) to the gentiles as he claimed, leaving the apostles to preach to the children of Israel. This explains why he deviates from their teachings, as the gentiles would be more recipient to these “softened” or compromised teachings. Or 2. Paul is one of the false prophets Jesus allegedly made reference to. It is claimed Paul opposed the religion of Jesus, then out of nowhere he claimed to have received a vision and converted. He then preached his own modified teachings under these false pretences, thus undermining the religion of Jesus. In either scenario I do not believe Paul received a vision of Jesus peace be upon him. I would not take the word of a self-proclaimed apostle who brought no evidence of this claim and contradicted the alleged teachings of the disciples found in other books of the New Testament.

[@bible1st]

Let it be known here and today that any man here among you that denies Paul, denies the Lord God and will go to destruction.

[@ThePropriate]

Where is that written? 😅

[@bible1st]

@@ThePropriate Its derived because Jesus confirmed Peter, and then Peter confirmed that Pau's writing are indeed scripture. So if you deny Paul you are denying the inspired word of God the scripture.

[@ThePropriate]

@@bible1st Scholars say that II Peter was written after Peter's death and uses wording that is vastly different from I Peter. In other words, it was not written by Peter. And there are several testimonies from early Christian writers, including but not only Jerome and Eusebius, that say that the Twelve trained disciples of Jesus rejected Paul as an Apostate from the Law, despite what Acts suggests. To put all your eggs in the basket of II Peter is kind of flimsy. But believe what you want.

[@bible1st]

@@ThePropriate Everything you just said is basically an insult to God. Like God cannot preserve his word. Once you start disregarding certain parts of scripture. Might as well throw it all out. It shows that your a fool and do not know God and have no faith.

[@KeepingWatch95]

Mark 4:14 *The sower soweth the word.* Mark 4:15 And *these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.* _Jesus sown the first "great commandment" in the hearts. (Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with _*_all thy heart, and with all thy soul,_*_ and with all thy mind.)_ _In John 7:16 Jesus testified that his doctrine was not his own, but [God's doctrine]._ John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* John 7:17 If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself. _When Jesus gave us the doctrine of the "great commandment" he indeed gives us God's doctrine._ _Notice the wording within the [first] great commandment; (... _*_love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul,_*_ …) and notice that this exact phrase has already been recorded and established as a doctrine within the old testament._ Matthew 22:36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Matthew 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with *all thy heart, and with all thy soul,* and with all thy mind. Matthew 22:38 This is the first and great commandment. Matthew 22:39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Matthew 22:40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. _Example of what it means to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul._ Deuteronomy 13:3 [...] for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye *love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.* Deuteronomy 13:4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, *and keep his commandments,* and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him. _Example of what it means to love God._ Deuteronomy 30:16 In that I command thee this day *to love the LORD thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments,* that thou mayest live [...]. _Deu 13:3-4 & Deu __30:16__ coveys the message that to "love the LORD your God {EVEN} with all your heart and with all your soul" means to "keep his commandments, and obey his voice" & "to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments."_ _Please remember what Jesus testifies in John 7:16-17_ John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* John 7:17 *If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.* _Now please notice in Luke 10:25 a lawyer's question to Jesus is; "...What shall I do to inherit...?"_ Luke 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, *what shall I do to inherit* eternal life? _This question "...What shall I do to inherit...?" is very much like asking; ...What is required of me [to inherit] ...?_ _And this question had already been addressed by God's doctrine, within the old testament in Deu __10:12__-13._ Deuteronomy 10:12 And now, Israel, *what doth the LORD thy God require of thee,* but to fear the LORD thy God, to walk in all his ways, and *to love him,* and *to serve the LORD thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul,* Deuteronomy 10:13 *To keep the commandments of the LORD, and his statutes,* which I command thee this day for thy good? _Now again looking at Luke 10:25 the man's question is first addressed by Jesus in this manner; "... _*_What is written in the law?_*_ ..._ _We know that when Jesus says "What is written in the law" would be referring to something already recorded. As God's doctrine was already recorded in the old testament._ _The man replies; "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul..." which is indeed written in the old testament._ Luke 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, *Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?* Luke 10:26 He said unto him, *What is written in the law?* how readest thou? Luke 10:27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. Luke 10:28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. _We can read nearly the same situation (question and answer) again in Mark 10:17-19._ Mark 10:17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, *what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?* Mark 10:18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God. Mark 10:19 *Thou knowest the commandments,* Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother. _In Mark 10:17 a person asks Jesus, "...what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?_ _In Mark 10:19 Jesus states; "Thou knowest the commandments..." (Note that the commandments were known by the man because they are already written, in God's doctrine, in the old testament.)_ _In Mark 10:19 Then Jesus began to recite from the Ten Commandments. (Which are the words of the covenant. God's covenant / God's doctrine.)_ _According to Exodus 34:28 the words of the covenant [are] the ten commandments._ Exodus 34:28 And he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. And he wrote upon the tables *the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.* _The words of the covenant (the ten commandments) are still required accordingly to Jesus' teachings. Again read likewise in Matthew 19:16-19._ Matthew 19:16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, *Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?* Matthew 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, *keep the commandments.* Matthew 19:18 He saith unto him, *Which?* Jesus said, *Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,* Matthew 19:19 *Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.* _In Matthew 19:16 a man asks, “Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?” Matthew 19:17 Jesus replies, “... keep the commandments.” Matthew 19:18 the man then asks, “Which?” [meaning “which” commandments]. Matthew 19:18-19 Jesus' replies by reciting from the words of the covenant, the ten commandments._ _According to Deuteronomy 4:13 the words of the covenant [are] the ten commandments._ Deuteronomy 4:13 And he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, ten commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone. _According to Jeremiah 31:31 & 33 the words of the covenant are written in people's inward parts [in his people' hearts]._ Jeremiah 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jeremiah 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jeremiah 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. _Notice in_ Jeremiah 31:33 *But this shall be the covenant* [...] that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, *I will put my law* [the words of the covenant, the ten commandments Exodus 34:28 & Jeremiah 31:32] *in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.* John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* John 7:17 *If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.* _(The conclusion of the whole matter)_ Ecclesiastes 12:12 ... be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh. Ecclesiastes 12:13 Let us hear *the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.* Ecclesiastes 12:14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil. _(A warning about false prophets who lead away from God's commandments.)_ Deuteronomy 13:1 If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, Deuteronomy 13:2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; Deuteronomy 13:3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your *God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.* Deuteronomy 13:4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him. Deuteronomy 13:5 And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee.

[@dorianphilotheates3769]

What’s really happening here? It is all part of the deadly power struggle between Paul’s Herodian dynasty that collaborated with the Roman occupation, and the true Davidic royal dynasty of Jesus and his brothers. Paul - and the Romans - won...

[@strikemaster1]

Dorian... Many are Called but Few are chosen. Peace.

[@dorianphilotheates3769]

Mikey Strikey - He told some good parables, that J.C. - even a pagan Greek can see that. Peace be with you, brother.

[@strikemaster1]

@@dorianphilotheates3769 Amen, and His teaching of repentance resonates perfectly with every sincere follower of of His. Remember brother... "His sheep hear His voice" which is great in one sence but sad in another because many who 'think' they are saved will be denied when their time comes. (Matt 7:21) Sincerity is the key because only the sincere have the motive to put His teachings into practice and thus achieve purity. There is one on KZbin called... "A voice in the desert" who is doing a great job of preching a Christ only doctrine. I love it. You might seek his work... its uplifting indeed.

[@paulrock4816]

For by Gace are you saved through Faith & not of works (of the Law) it is a gift of God not of works lest any man should boast.

[@paulrock4816]

@@strikemaster1 Jesus was sent to his own (Jews) under the Law. not to the gentiles who were not under the Law Acts 15:7-11.

[@93556108]

Are you implying the new covenant believers in Christ are still under the law of the Mosaic or old covenant? Thank you.

[@staza1]

He won't come outright and say that, but yes, that's exactly what he's saying. Religious pharisees will always try to steal your freedom in Christ and try to put you back under the law. Just like they tried to do to Paul.

[@93556108]

@@staza1 yes, you are correct. Thank you.

[@93556108]

@@petrhegner7513 FYI Apostle Paul was hand picked by our Lord, Jesus and he is the smartest intellectually among the rest of the Apostles. Paul was given direct revelations for three years by our Lord and if we count the 66 “books” of the New Testament, 14 of the 27 books of the NT were written by the apostle Paul, so it seems a bit more than half. But, if we count the 260 chapters of the New Testament, Paul wrote about 100 chapters which adds up to about 38%. Please elaborate what's your "strange vibe towards Pauls stuff". Please quote for me the verses in the bible since you claimed "yes the laws are to be kept". Further tell me what it is about doing our fathers work until the end? Thank you.

[@FireShine-ss4sb]

The Law of Moses, 10 Commandments is never going away. Jesus quoted them. The Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ is now the Law that saves. To hear Gods Voice and Obey God's Holy Love......gets you in with the 12 Commandments now in force. Need a New Birth.....Jeremiah 31:31.

[@93556108]

@@FireShine-ss4sb We are under the Law of Christ which is far superior than the Law of Moses which Christ fulfilled in Mat5:17. Law doesn't saves anyone as Christians are save by the grace of God through faith in Christ and instead the Law kills. We lived by the New commandment of Jesus and NOT the old laws in the OT (Hebrews8:13) as it has now been done away.

[@carchibald9322]

If Keeping the law could save you CHRIST DIED FOR NOTHING!!!!!!! Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law. Romans 3:31 Trusting in Christs finished work on the cross saves you. Not your human effort at keeping the law. What does this faith in Christ produce? LOVE! For who? GOD! "Whoever has my commands and keeps them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love them and show myself to them." John 14:21, 12 My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. 13 Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. 14 You are my friends if you do what I command John 15:12-14. If you believe you are going to save yourself by keeping the law you must repent and trust in Christ. For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it James 2:10. NONE of us are without sin. We are justified freely by his grace so that NO MAN can boast!

[@duffgordon9005]

Preach it with yiur great name--ARCHIBALD

[@jeanben2176]

You have understood this the way it is! sadly to say all the followers of the law of Moses think that trusting in his works will save them, I keep praying for them even if they hate me for saying this, have a great day.

[@kfitz4520]

I don't think anyone here thinks that the law will save them. Everyone knows it's grace that saves; however, that doesn't mean the law was done away. We follow the commandments because He told us too. We don't follow the commandments to be saved. Also, we know that works cannot save us. Again, only the grace of God saves. However, you better believe He knows our works. Read what He said to the Assemblies in Revelation if you don't believe me.

[@jeanben2176]

@@kfitz4520 You would be surprised, a lot of followers affirm that if you love Jesus you have to be circumcised[ this is a real example of a free interpretation of what many say it is how God wants us to love Him, When it comes to interpret the words of Christ ´´ I f you love me keep my commandments´´ we have to be really careful, if we try to interpret that literally we will end becoming jews [ as far as trying to keep the law and itsl celebrations] bottom line we would be combining the law of Moses, all its celebrations and the ´´ faith of Christ ´´ affirming now we are real believers. I have seen that many think that way, I know of preachers, ´´ christians preachers ´´ that tell their followers to circumcise themselves to be ´´fully saved´´ What is your view about this?

[@johnramirez3247]

Christ died for the sins of those jews who didn't follow the law in those times. It's not a permament cleansing for everyone and the future sins. Lol

[@bibledefinedbymartycozad]

Bible Paul apostleship questioned I Cor 9:1 Am I not free? Am I NOT an apostle? Have I NOT seen Jesus our Lord? Acts 6:2 And the TWELVE summoned the full number of disciples and said, (church was going and Paul was not in the picture) Acts 9:4,7,8 He heard a voice saying to him 7. Hearing a voice but NOT seeing anyone. 8. His eyes were opened, he saw nothing! (Luke records what Paul told him; 2nd hand info) (NO, all three testimonies by Paul says he ONLY heard a voice) I Cor 9:2 ***If to others I am NOT an apostle,*** at LEAST I am to you, for YOU ARE THE SEAL OF MY APOSTLESHIP in the lord. (This does NOT qualify him as one by people’s opinions; Jesus sets the qualifications. * He knows that he does not meet the requirements) I Cor 15:1,2 Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel “I” preached to you, (key) which you received on which you stand. 2. And by which you are being saved, IF you hold fast to the word “I” preached to you. (Paul’s reasoning and lies to them) I Cor 15:8 Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. 9. For I am the least of the apostles, unworthy to be called an apostle, because (he did not walk with Yeshua or see him die and be raised) I persecuted the church of God. (True but misleading statement in context) Acts 18:6 And when they opposed and reviled Paul, he shook out his garments; and said to them, “Your blood be on your own heads; (Jews) I am innocent, FROM NOW ON I will go to the Gentiles. (in Corinth at the time and Jews knew the Torah and Paul preached against it,. Rms 11:13,14 Now I am speaking to you Gentiles in as much then as I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry 14. He wants to make Jews envious, so he uses manipulation) (One twisted truth after the other.) I Jhn 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us they would have continued with us. II Cor 12:12 The signs of a TRUE apostle were performed among you with utmost patience, with SIGNS and WONDERS and MIGHTY WORKS. (Not even close to Christ qualifications set) see video.

[@jesseljones4991]

“Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they. Then all the multitude kept silence, and gave audience to Barnabas and Paul, declaring what miracles and wonders God had wrought among the Gentiles by them.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭15:10-12‬ ‭KJV‬‬ “And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly. And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry. And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them; Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication. Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them. And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him, Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place. (For they had seen before with him in the city Trophimus an Ephesian, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple.) And all the city was moved, and the people ran together: and they took Paul, and drew him out of the temple: and forthwith the doors were shut. And as they went about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭21:17-31‬ ‭KJV‬‬ “But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭9:15-16‬ ‭KJV‬‬ “Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins: And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭13:38-39‬ ‭KJV‬‬

[@happydays310]

Thank you for your comments Jessel. The reason people are confused is because they fail to rightly divide the Word of Truth, 2 Timothy 2 15. May I recommend alreadyforgiven.com and truthtimeradio.com who practice rightly dividing the Word of Truth in order to understand the Bible.

[@jesseljones4991]

Freedom in Christ Thank you, I am familiar with both already I appreciate it.

[@paulrock4816]

Thank-you we were never under the law but under grace. Paul's gospel is the cross & the blood of Jesus. Jews were looking for the Kingdom we gentiles were not. Blood of Jesus Saves/ cleans/sanctifies/justifies/ makes us righteous/intercede for us/gives us access to the throne of Mercy. Acts 15 (Luke's version) Gal: 2 (Paul's version ) of the Jerusalem council, of Paul's gospel of Gal 1:11 which come down to 1st Cor. 15:1-4. The gospel we preach/you receive/ye stand/& ye are saved by. Jesus died for our sins buried & 3rd day rose again. unless you believed in vain.

[@Hebrew42Day]

@@paulrock4816 without the law you're under the curses.

[@pm5206]

Paul Rock Acts 15 is corrupt. Also, why quote Paul and not anyone else? Learn what grace actually is. It’s earned. Yahusha said so! The kingdom is coming. Repent, for the kingdom is at hand. Do you reject Yahusha for Paul? Paul is NOT the Moshaich. Yahsuha is. A totally depraved man (Paul called himself that) cannot deliver you.

[@andresullivan6473]

So what law should we keep

[@Eye_Witness]

Christians are already keeping about 148 of the 613 Old Testament Laws. Messianic/Hebrew Roots believers keep about 292 and there are about 321 that we would all agree are no longer applicable today, mostly because there is no longer a Temple or Levitical Priesthood. Some of those are debatable because they have to do with jurisprudence and our legal system is different today. Interesting, eh?

[@andresullivan6473]

@@Eye_Witness thank you for taking the time to reply. That is very interesting

[@Eye_Witness]

@@andresullivan6473 You're welcome. It took some time to break all of that down and I'm still sort of working and revising some things along those lines. It is somewhat difficult due to the nature of the laws, commandments, judgements and other factors. But it's fun delving into it. Blessings.

[@andresullivan6473]

@@Eye_Witness well I'm grateful that you have and are still it gives me a place to staft

[@Eye_Witness]

@@andresullivan6473 Keeping Sabbath was what stuck with me most. My dad was a preacher and couldn't give me any real answers. Nothing made sense. Been keeping a Friday sundown to Saturday sundown Sabbath now for over 25 years. I love it. Ask a lot of questions, but get both sides of any subject. Monte Judah's "Messianic Teachings for Christians" has a lot of info about keeping the Law. Let me know what you think if you watch any of his KZbin videos. Blessings.

[@ragingbull8024]

They hate St. Paul because what he wrote in GALATIANS 1:6.

[@duffgordon9005]

Can you believe the Paul haters here?? I know from this crowd what the wide gate is- Law keeping, which narcissists love to show their love for but are empty suits

[@Ttcopp12rt]

This is my recent debate on Pauls teachings vs a Muslim kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2Sceo2BmbGtoJo

[@CrazyKillerPlayz]

@Dwayne Johnson how

[@jeanben2176]

Shalom , that is correct! luckily for the many believes of the fisrt century Peter left a testimony about Paul, and it is a good testimony, Paul has been misunderstood, that is what it is.

[@KeepingWatch95]

@@jeanben2176 _It's a good thing Jesus left a testimony about Peter's testimony._ John 21:17 He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep. John 21:18 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: *but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.*

[@Sindi63084]

Paul was coming in as apostle number 13! So what do we know about number 13 and the freemason?

[@AbrahamsBridges]

Hi, brother. Paul refers to James as an apostle. When did James, the brother of Yeshua, become an apostle?

[@thesweatypro8133]

It was James the brother of John the apostle., not James the brother of Jesus.

[@IG-ln7zt]

@@thesweatypro8133 That's not a good answer, though. Was John called "lord"? Because, Paul says "James, the brother of the lord".

[@beeinthebodytorahclass2002]

Apostle means "sent one", Yeshua sent all of us to share the gospel so this means all followers of Yeshua are apostles and disciples (aka talmidim, which means "taught ones") The Twelve were "Elders" so they were leaders. John refers to himself as an Elder.

[@MSHOOD123]

have you read Paul in Greek at all, since he wrote the Greek gentiles?

[@strikemaster1]

The Law can be divided into two parts. The first is the Law of God in the 10 Commandments called the Moral Law, and the Law of Moses which include the food, sacrificial, and ceremonial Laws. The former is mandatory, and the later advisory. The former is of God and the latter of man. The former is the original of God and the latter added by man. The 12 disciples teach what Yahoshua himself TAUGHT them. Paul teaches what HE THINKS. This is a difficult area because there is no argument that both teachings are not in harmony, so one is in a technical way "Antichrist"... but on the other hand, Yahoshua once said... "if he is not against Me, then he is for Me". As for my own personal view... I choose the way taught by Yahoshua because of Pauls lack of power to heal himself. Let me see your power first; then I will believe. In all my many visits to churches all over Australia that follow the teachings of Paul but hardly ever speak of the teachings of Christ, I am yet to see even one true healing that lasts.

[@paulrock4816]

If the law was enough Jesus would not have had to die for our sins. Eph 2:8-9 For by grace are you saved through faith & not of yourselves, It is a gift of God & not of works of the Law. If you keep the law you brake it at any point you are guilty of the entire law. You think the Law can save you? No, it can not, only Jesus saves.

[@HistoryandReviews]

Lmao wrong THE ENTIRE LAW is HOLY

[@strikemaster1]

@@HistoryandReviews Laugh yourself silly... no skin off my nose. Try reading Jer. 7:22-23 which does not agree with you. How can the blood of and innocent animal pay the cost of evil people? This is what God wants... For I desire steadfast love and NOT sacrifice, the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings. -- Hosea 6:6

[@HistoryandReviews]

@@strikemaster1 moron try reading That Jeremiah again, it says IN THOSE DAYS, not the current day of Jeremiah. People sacrificed animals AFTER GOD gave Moses the Law, and that Hosea passage you also rip out of context. Because God had ZERO issue with the 5 billion animals sacrificed in the bible for sins. So to say God never wanted animal sacrifice is BS when He gave the command to Moses and everyone did it

[@strikemaster1]

@@HistoryandReviews Moron?.. right. No offence, but it may appear to those reading this, that it is the "pot calling the kettle black" here. (wink) Jesus told the evil people of the day, that the LAW of divorce was NOT the way in the BEGINNING, but He only allowed MOSES to include the law of divorce because why? Because the evil people of that day of Moses were...hard hearted. Notice two things here. Firstly it was NOT God who gave that law, and therefore it was not HOLY, and secondly, the people of that day were not holy. The astute with insight can see clearly that because of what Jesus says here, the complete law (613 of them) is not always from God, and therefore not all holy. However, the Ten Commandments were from the finger of God, and not Moses as a secondhand law. Jesus, the One you do not believe in, never accepted divorce unless the partner was unfaithful, but Moses apparently allowed it because he was influenced by the evil hardened hearts of that time. So who has the HOLY law? Jesus of course, the very one you refuse to acknowledge. There is law, and there is HOLY LAW. Those with Jesus in there hearts only choose the holy law. By your unholy way of dialogue, it indicates to me at least, that you need Jesus my friend. Yes, all Gods children are my friends, even though at times they show their bad side so boldly, because "they know not what they do". BTW, I see no talk about "in those days" at all in the whole chapter, except at the end where God is talking about what He will do with this evil generation. Care to describe in more detail? A verse maybe?

[@skywalker6940]

If Paul was teaching error or apostasy, why wasn’t this revealed in the book of Revelation or anywhere in scripture. In Revelation Jesus called out Jezebel’s teaching, but nowhere in scripture does He criticize Paul’s teaching. In fact, Paul’s teaching was eventually affirmed by the other apostles🤔

[@caitlinsoliman1658]

You know I definitely believe in Jesus and read the Bible but it is all so confusing.

[@allentobolewski7273]

Stay away from fake-Paul and the true names are Yahuah and Yahoshua.

[@bahatimwakasole4899]

Peter understood the new program that God had initiated through Apostle Paul. But many others of the twelve apostles did not understand. ..

[@yodhin79]

The fact Jesus never mentions Paul even in suggestion is very problematic. Paul's "vision" of Jesus is based on his word alone. The reason the Apostles rejected him was because he wasn't on the level. The fact Christianity today is based mostly on Paul is proof Christians are in name only.

[@AnonYmous-tw7re]

Awesome job.

[@Ttcopp12rt]

You may enjoy this Pauline debate kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2Sceo2BmbGtoJo

[@inthenamemosthigh]

Mattias was elected 12 in acts 1..Saul/Paul scattered, made Christianity, and finished in Rome. a Pharisee which Jesus warned. Genesis17 exodus12 Joshua 5 numbers9 John 7 : 23 acts 7 : 8

[@rodlancaster6431]

Please read and consider Acts 28:1-28

[@Hebrew42Day]

@@rodlancaster6431 I have read and considered it. Read and consider Paul's own admitted double-mindedness. "To the Jew, I was a Jew. To the Greek a Greek" Narrow or broad?

[@thomasremmers8250]

@@Hebrew42Day culture and customs , as the proverb went when in Rome be like the romans, and if you read in context he clarified as not without torah. Your interpretation is wrong

[@catalyn080]

Jesus kept it simple. He taught and demonstrated that love is an action. As John explains, “Let us not love in word or in tongue, but in deed and in truth” (1 John 3:18). actions means deeds or works . Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. faith without works is dead.

[@thecarrot1409]

Didn’t even have to watch the video , all these comments are sickening , Apostle Paul was an apostle and he was given a revelation by Jesus himself . You guys are deceived. Read your bibles and stop falling for what Men say . Follow what God fays

[@KeepingWatch95]

John 12:44 Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me. John 12:45 And he that seeth me seeth him that sent me. John 12:46 I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness. John 12:47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world. John 12:48 *He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.* _Paul does not follow Jesus' instructions. Look at Jesus' instructions: _ Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. _Jesus said, one is your Father which is in heaven._ _Jesus is talking about God the Father._ _Jesus is talking about a spiritual Father in heaven._ _Follower's of Jesus do not go about calling God their physical and biological father._ _However Follower's of Jesus do call God their spiritual Father._ _Jesus' instructed that it is wrong to call any man on earth your [spiritual] Father as instructed by Jesus._ _However (against Jesus' instructions) Paul makes claim to be your [spiritual] father through [his] gospel._ 1 Corinthians 4:15 For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel._ In 1 Cor 4:15 Paul is not claiming to be your physical and biological father through the gospel, here in 1Cor 4:15. For if Paul were to claim to be your biological father, it would be an obvious lie (Paul had no children.) _However what Paul is claiming is to be your [spiritual] father through [his] gospel._ _Do you also claim that Paul is your father through his gospel?_ _If you do not call Paul your father through the gospel, it appears you acknowledge Paul does not follow Jesus' instruction concerning this._ 👍

[@paulrock4816]

Thank you these blind people are still under the law. Jesus's death was not enough for them they had to add to it. Good Luck under the Law, Jesus said I AM the way the truth & the life, no one comes to the Father but by me, not the Law of Moses. Paul was a chosen vessel of Jesus Acts 9:15

[@thecarrot1409]

Paul Rock amen brother

[@paulrock4816]

@@KeepingWatch95 When I read the 4 gospels written to Jews. 1st gentile was Acts 10. Jesus said over & over again. I have come for the lost sheep of Israel. Even gifted the 12 Apostle with power commanding them not to go to the gentiles. Even told a gentile woman it's not right I take food from the table of the children & cast it to dogs. Jesus had no intention of going to the gentiles. The 12 Apostle had no intention of going to the gentiles except once with Cornelius. Peter uses in Acts 15:7-11 to defend Paul also in 2 Peter 3:15,16. Jesus could have used the 12 Apostle to preach to the world, but he already rewarded the 12 to sit over the 12 tribes judging them in the regeneration. Apostle Paul weather you like it or not gentiles were given over to the Apostle Paul. I read as Peter was to the circumcision Paul is to the uncircumcision. I think after the stoning of Stephen you can see the gospel switching to the gentiles over the Jews. Jews rejected Christ over & over again. Acts 9:15 This man Paul is a chosen vessel unto me to take my name to the gentiles. Not with the Law but with the gospel of grace Jesus fulfilled the Law, nailing those handwritten ordinances to the cross, if the Law could save you we would not need another. Law can not save only Jesus & his shed blood can save a sinner. As Peter said why to put a yoke on the neck of these disciples which we or our Fathers were not able to bear. Acts 15: 10,11

[@KeepingWatch95]

@@paulrock4816 _Jesus would have of course, known about Paul even before Paul came._ _And indeed Jesus did foretell to his disciples of what (or who) was going to come during this time:_ John 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. John 14:29 *And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.* John 14:30 *Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.* _The person of Jesus' prophecy in John __14:30__ had to come in a relatively short span of time. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion (verse John __14:28__) and before all his disciples had passed away (John __14:30__)._ _Jesus' prophecy did come true during the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. (Which is during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_ _But why didn't Jesus tell his disciples after this came to pass? Because (John __14:29__) he told them it before it came to pass, that, _*_when it is come to pass, ye might believe._* Please note the following: _Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (the 4 Gospels) are record of events which occurred while Jesus was talking much with his disciples._ _Paul epistles (13 letters) are record of events which came during the time Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (During the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_ _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ _What Paul teaches in Galatians:_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ Furthermore in Galatians 5:2 Galatians 5:2 *Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.* _(In Galatians 5:2 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) says “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _According to Paul; Peter was given [by God] an apostleship (Gal 2:8) or gospel (Gal 2:7) of circumcision. Paul then claims (Gal 5:2) “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _Paul is claiming that Peter was given (followed and taught) a gospel in which “Christ shall profit you nothing.” (That is; an unprofitable gospel in Christ.) An unprofitable gospel is just another way of saying a false gospel._ _And if Peter followed an unprofitable gospel it would also be true of all of Jesus' disciples._ _I doubt Jesus would agree that Peter (and all his disciples) were given and committed (by God) to a gospel in which Christ shall profit [them] nothing._ _This "contrariwise" teaching only comes from Paul, who indeed came while Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._ *_If anyone disagrees perhaps they can show a quote from Jesus saying that God committed Peter to a gospel that was unprofitable in Christ._* _Moreover:_ _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ _Further more Paul makes the following claim in Romans __11:13_ Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as *I am the apostle of the Gentiles,* I magnify mine office: _(In Romans __11:13__ Paul makes a clear claim to be “the apostle of the Gentiles”.)_ _(However before Paul came, and during the time (John __14:28__-30) that Jesus was talking much with his disciples; Jesus had already given instructions to his disciples to preach unto the Gentiles (teach all nations) and (into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.)_ Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _(In Matthew __28:16__ is concerning the remaining 11 disciples.)_ _(In Matthew __28:19__ “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,” all nations would of course include the Gentiles nations. Because Israel was the only nation that was not Gentile.)_ _More in the gospel of Mark:_ Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.* Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. _(Mark __16:15__ “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Does include all the Gentile people.)_ _And notice again in Matt __28:19__-20 Jesus gave them instructions to “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” … “ Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world..” (It appears Jesus says he would be with them as they did so, even unto the end of the world.)_ Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _The teaching that Peter was to preach to a different group of people is directly against, and is “contrariwise” to what Jesus told his disciple while he was with them and talking much with them. This “contrariwise” teaching (Galatians 2:7) came by Paul during the exact time that Jesus foretold about. Which is after the crucifixion and during the remaining time the disciples were alive, and while Jesus was not talking much with them. (John __14:28__-30)._

[@ronkebarber6238]

And the Apostle Paul was the last desciple to be called by Jesus Luke 18:22. I believe he was also present at the time of the baptism of Jesus Christ, because he would have known about John the Baptist and everything he said concerning the Messiah, which could have prompted him, as a Pharisee of pharisees, to seek out validation from him in Luke 18. 1) The rich young ruler's main concern was to "inherit eternal life " vs 18. He judged himself worthy because he believed he had been obeying all the laws. 2) He had been listening to Jesus's teachings and was convinced that he was a man of authority, though, he wasn't ready to accept the fact He could be the Messiah, so he approached Jesus in a condescending manner- as he was a pharisee and they believed themselves to be above everyone else. So, he sucked up to Jesus by calling Him "Good Master ". Jesus saw through him and responded in a way that means He was God, if Paul believed that He was good, and went on to poke holes in his legalistic beliefs- he believed he never committed adultery, but Jesus taught that to just look on a maiden lustfully already constituted a breaking of the law, so was bearing false witness, which they were notorious for, but wouldn't admit to, so he was indirectly stealing from the temple coffers in the name of doing business for God Galatians 1:14; as was not honoring their fathers and mothers in the name of bringing offerings to the temple etc. and finally, told him to get rid of the source of his pride: his wealth, and distribute to the poor, as they usually pretended to do to look good before the people. He wasn't ready to even exchange that to gain eternal life, which Jesus understood (and gave him time before answering his calling vs 22). He began to follow Jesus from then onwards, persecuting Him just to get physical proof on Him as a fraud. I believe he was behind all the questions to get Jesus to break the laws- including paying taxes (Jesus was called the Son of David, David and his house have been tax exempt by King Saul, for slaying Goliath, by this they're negating His relationship with King David, hence, cannot be the Messiah, they even insult Him of being born of fornication, as Mary got pregnant before getting married John 8:41 etc.) 3) I believe he spearheaded the group that deceived Judas to betray Him, and those they bought to shout "crucify him " over and over again until Jesus was crucified on the cross. He really did persecute Jesus and by so doing, get to follow Him as other desciples, learning from His teachings all along, even sneaking behind to witness the last supper to confidently say he received it of the Lord 1 Corinthians 11:23, to make hin an Apostle born out of due time - long after his calling 1 Corinthians 15:8. 3) His anger made him turn his his back on his own life, and began to persecute everyone linked to Jesus, from Stephen up till the time he fell off his high horse- so to speak, and was forced to come to reality of who Jesus Christ really was- The Son if man(David), The Son of God, which he knew all along but his legalistic mind was resisting it: he finally called Jesus "Lord", though subconsciously, but he always knew He was Lord when he heard His voice again Acts 9:4-5. After this, he became so overzealous enough to begin to let everyone know that "Jesus was the Son of God, and the Messiah" vs 20,22. He began to immediately experience persecution himself, which got him to Arabia, where he had ample time and opportunity to review all the proof he had collected while he was persecuting Jesus 2 Timothy 4:13. He could even have been the naked young man, who was used to entrap JesusChriston the night of His arrest. Mark 14:51-52. (That was why he could write with so much understanding of the Lord in all his epistles). 4) Philippians 3 was where he finally came to terms with the fact that all his wealth could not be exchanged for the knowledge of Christ and gaining eternal life- his all life pursuit Luke18:18! This came at a price though - he lost all his fortune, that he wasn't willing to give up at that time: Luke 18:18-30, calling them "dung." But now, forgetting all his past life and pressing towards the prize of the "high calling " of Jesus, as he now sees it! That was why it was easy for the other desciples to extend to him the right hand of fellowship as the Apostle of the gentiles Galatians 2:9. That was also why he could withstand the other desciples when they were preaching the law and circumcision together with the grace of God in Christ Jesus in Acts 15. Immediately after preaching in the synagogue that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, Acts 9:20-22, God sent Barnabas to help him fulfill his calling, and spread the gospel if salvation to both Jews and gentiles, especially the gentiles. The gospel of the salvation of our souls is simply by grace through faith in the sacrificial death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ and the completed work of the cross that no one can add to or remove from by doing good or bad. The Holy Spirit was sent to guide, teach, interpret, and keep until the end, John 14:26. Thus, He quickenes the believers and takes them all up at rapture. Until then, we give ourselves to studying the scriptures to make ourselves approved unto God as workmen that need not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth-daily! That was the reason why the Apostle loved his Jewish brethren so much that he wouldn't mind being accursed, as long as they can all (the 12 tribes), be saved! Romans 9:3! That was the reason he endures so much beatings and maltreatment from the Jews, who really hated him, but he continued to concern himself with them, even took up collection of money for the Jewish belivers, even though he was sent to the gentiles-39 stripes 5 timed, got shipwrecked, got bitten by a venomous snake, but like the Duracell battery, he still kept going strong till the end! How stinky and painful and full of putrefying sores, his body must have been, yet he kept on going... So he ran and finished his course and ensured that the outcast tribe of Benjamin, finally has a place in the body of Jesus Christ, and will sit with Him on the right hand of the throne of God, in heavenly places! He made and left us all a legacy, so we can all make it. Thus, he is free from the blood of everyone who rejects so great a salvation story!

[@leeshelenberger7240]

In Matthew, Mark, Luke and John Jesus said go Not unto the gentiles but for to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Paul teaches the gospel of the grace of God(body of Christ) 12 apostles teach the gospel of the kingdom(Israel) 2 Tim 2:15 rightly divide the word of truth. Jesus sent 12 apostles for Israel, Jesus sent Paul to the gentiles to form the body of Christ under dispensation of grace.

[@allentobolewski7273]

Acts 15:7, Peter said to them, Elohim chose Among Us that through my mouth the Gentiles would hear the good news. Fake-Shaul, Galatians 1: 15 through 20 Galatians 2:1-14

[@pezpez2383]

Romans Chapter 3: A treatise on paul the false apostles confession and self proof of promoting lying. The argument and proof that paul is a liar and anti-Christ most often draws itself to line 7 which states: “For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?” To which people who follow paul, even exalting him above Yahushua, reply that you are out of context, paul is answering peoples questions. They will tell you to read the whole chapter and you will gain ‘their’ understanding. Sam Shamoun has a video where he is demeaning Muslims for professing this and commits the crime he accuses them of. (I am a devout follower of the way, not Muslim). He points them to only one or two qualifying versus saying “read the next line and you’re done.” Rom 3:8 And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come...whose damnation is just. Here the pauline apologist will demand we accept pauls explanation that he is denying his promotion of lying to spread the gospel with only 1 more line of context. If we did they would have a point to consider. I did not. I read the whole chapter in English and Greek and what I found was disturbing and affirming that paul is not only indeed a liar, but that line 7 is exactly what anti-paul people think it means. paul endorses lying. Let us look at a few very specific defining lines in this chapter to do so. In looking at them the pauline apologist reader should come away with an ability to make a more perfect sense of the lines not addressed. Not in order of importance or magnitude, but in succession. First let us note paul seems fond of lying on King David (of whom Christ is both the son and The Lord). So now let us do exactly that. Rom 3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. It is widely held by most scholars that this originates from Psalms: 116:11 “I said in my haste, All men are liars.” Where David declares it was stated in haste, paul changes its meaning (lies) and says ‘all men ARE liars’ and qualifies it by jumping to psalms 51:4 and quoting to promote his (Not Christs’) salvation by grace alone (mystery) gospel witnessed in his leading statements in 3:5 and 3:6. Again, another lie. Rom 3:9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; Looking at the context of Psalms 116:11 David is obviously (in context) referring to a segment of people where paul forthrightly states he is collapsing all of humanity into his statement. This will also be evidenced in lines to follow. Again, another lie. Rom 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: This is a reference to Psalms 14:1-3. Here again, David (in context) is referring to a totality in a specific group of people… not all people. This is evidenced in Psalms 14:5 where David clearly points out there are righteous people and God is with them. pauls teachings are that righteousness does not exist outside of Christ and didn’t exist before He came among us. Here paul is blatantly lying again by altering Davids’ true words and meanings. AND, he knows it. Again, another lie. Rom 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. A direct reference to Psalms 14:2 The LORD looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. Here paul is rebuked by his own invocation… did he not write Psalms 14:1 “To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.” Here David is obviously stating that there is none that doeth good AMONG THE FOOLS. Proverbs 14:3 states “In the mouth of the foolish is a rod of pride: but the lips of the wise shall preserve them.” There have always been wise and righteous men, even when it was as few as Noah and his kin. Again, another lie. Here after in Romans paul just diatribes old testament lines, lines about how sinful some people are and finally brings us to his wrap up in these final lines. Which are again his gospel not Christs that says there is salvation by grace alone. Again, another lie. Rom 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Rom 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. One is left to wonder why paul chose David to lie on to make his point. I have conjecture that the slightest contemplation would point toward an attack on Christs’ lineage in an effort to cause confusion and division among those seeking Christ. In one small chapter Paul has obliterated the truth of more than a handful of Old Testament teachings that Christ endorses. Now lets take all this and apply it to the context claimed by pauline apologists. Rom 3:8 “And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.” This as stated is the line most used to justify line 3:7 by pauline apologists.. Note now in context, that paul uses paul to justify paul. He bears witness to himself claiming they are slanderously reported, and here’s a weird finish to the sentence “some AFFIRM they say”! Who? .. “let us do evil, that good may come. Whose damnation is just” , and then goes on to suggest it is not in following lines. This is against what Christ teaches. Now here’s the crust on the biscuit, paul then goes on to do evil by lying about King David more than a handful of times throwing it right in our faces. Doing exactly what he claimed to be slanderously and affirmingly reported! Lying! If this justification is falsified, which I believe I have shown here, until proven wrong, beyond contestation, then line 3:7 reads is as it reads and paul is openely confessing to using sin and breaking the commandments or ‘the law’ to bring people to Christ. May God bless and keep you and all you love. Aman. ©kravtech

[@SharonBalloch]

Well I am not willing to take out Luke as Luke travelled with Paul on some of his journeys walking long roads and he never mentioned that Paul was false..and Timothy definitely believe Paul.. and even though they all did not agree on everything Peter finally got it... and he said this about Paul.. 2Peter 15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;

[@KeepingWatch95]

However Paul is willing to take out Jesus' teachings, so don't follow Paul as an inplacement of Jesus.

[@kingdomtruther6922]

Yeah I'm currently looking into luke as well... I know paul was a false teacher..so I have to keep a keen eye on Luke now....

[@KeepingWatch95]

@@kingdomtruther6922 Luke dosen't present himself a teacher as Paul does. It appears Luke recorded things that were told to him by others, much as an unbias reporter used to do.

[@MarvelousSquad]

@@KeepingWatch95 he’s not though. Paul agrees with Jesus’ teachings. Jesus said he came to fulfill the law, not abolish it. He fulfilled the law in the sense that he “completed” it. He obeyed it fully and was perfect. Paul speaks more on this in his letters. The gospels also mention Jesus will die, John also clearly refers to Jesus’ divinity. The gospels record Jesus saying “Love your God, Love your neighbor, that on these 2 rules depend all of the law”. And also Luke wrote both acts and the gospel of Luke, Acts mentions Jesus’ resurrection. James also mentions Jesus as “the Lord” in the book of James. Gospel of Luke mentions Jesus as the messiah as well, something Jews disageee with. If Luke is untrustworthy, then you would have to conclude that Acts is also untrustworthy, because Like wrote both. But Acts is where most of this videos’ “proof” comes from, so then what? If you really think about It, it would not make sense for Paul to be the inventor of christianity, because the gospels and even other books like John and James seem to follow the same doctrine Paul is following. So either the ENTIRE new testament is corrupt or it’s not. Not just Paul’s books.

[@KeepingWatch95]

@@MarvelousSquad _From even the very first claim by Paul to have met with Jesus on the way to Damascus is false per Jesus' foretelling and forewarning._ _Jesus forewarned of false prophets to come. Jesus told what they would claim and instructed not to believe them._ Matthew 24:23 *Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.* Matthew 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, *and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders;* insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Matthew 24:25 *Behold, I have told you before.* Matthew 24:26 *Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert;* go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; *believe it not.* Matthew 24:27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. (Note: Matthew 24:26 the word “Desert” also means wilderness.) G2048 ἔρημος erēmos er'-ay-mos Of uncertain affinity; lonesome, that is, (by implication) waste (usually as a noun, G5561 being implied): - desert, desolate, solitary, wilderness. (In Acts 9:3 Paul claims he met Jesus in the wilderness/desert.) Acts 9:3 And as *he journeyed, he came near Damascus:* and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: (Acts 9:3 the road to Damascus was in the wilderness. See 1 Kings 19:15 which records the way to Damascus is wilderness/desert.) 1 Kings 19:15 And the LORD said unto him, Go, return on thy way to the wilderness of Damascus: and when thou comest, anoint Hazael to be king over Syria: (Note: 1 Kings 19:15 the Hebrew word “wilderness” H4057 also means desert.) H4057מִדְבָּר midbâr mid-bawr' From H1696 in the sense of driving; a pasture (that is, open field, whither cattle are driven); by implication a desert; also speech (including its organs): - desert, south, speech, wilderness. _If one truly believes Jesus' warning they can not believe Paul's false claim. The only way to believe Paul's story is true, one has to discredit Jesus' warnings and instructions as false._

[@horseman528]

If keeping the Law makes us perfect before God, why would we need the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross? In Matthew 26:26-28, it states, "And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take eat; this is my body. And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it: For this is my blood of the NEW TESTAMENT, which is shed for many for the remission of sins." Paul wrote in Romans 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin." We keep all the moral precepts of the law, but the rituals, ceremonies, and feast days were a shadow of Christ. We fulfill the law through faith in Christ according to Colossians 2:10-17. By the way, Matthew was one of the 12 Apostles.

[@lancewalden5404]

Thank you so much. There was always something about Paul I did not like. Paul this, Paul that... Never God this, God that or Jesus this, Jesus that... If the church likes Paul , loves Paul that much, something is wrong. Jesus said, if they hated me, they will hate you. Jesus is so right. I have learned... Amen, God bless you Brother.thank you.

[@microphone321]

I don’t get what Paul did that was so bad ,, he always always gave glory and respect to Jesus , and he gained nothing from preaching about Jesus , he was a high member in Jewish society and fell all the way to the bottom because of his belief in Jesus and he was even killed ,, i don’t get the hatred towards Paul

[@jeanben2176]

Shalom, Lance, just one very honest question, do you believe apostle Peter lost his mind in his late years, I mean when he grew old? sorry one more question, do you believe what he wrote was under the inspiration of God? could you please give me your honest answer?

[@cheersmathtabby461]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/pajckGOLm6-Drrc

[@isogrifo71]

@@microphone321 He bad mouth the true Apostles, lied about being an apostle, and perverted the gospel with his own "gospel". If Christianity today is a result of Paul's teaching, then he has led BILLIONS of people astray.

[@donpetty7584]

No, you don't have a full understanding of NT scripture. There were other Apostles besides the [original twelve that walked with Christ], and Paul. In Galations 1:19 James, the brother of Jesus, is called an Apostle. In Acts 15:13-19 James is seen as being one that presided at the council of Jerusalem. Why would he do so unless he were regarded as at the same level/authority as Peter and the other Apostles? Plus he authored a book that is in the NT as being inspired by God. In Acts 14:14, Barnabas is also called an Apostle. Silas, also, may have been an apostle. See 1 Thes 1:1, 2:6.7. Also, Silas was a leading man among the brothers, Acts 15;22. The scripture you sight claiming Peter was sent to the gentiles, as a population, is in error. What Peter is referring to is the one specific occasion where God sent him to the house of Cornelius, a Roman Centurion, a gentile. The dream Peter had just before this about unclean animals, Peter interprets as God instructing him not to view any human being as impure or unclean, or unworthy of the Gospel. So, when the men arrive to ask him to come with them to Cornelius' house, Peter goes. Peter wasn't sent to the Gentiles, as a people. He was sent to Cornelius' house. That's what that scripture is referring to. Here it is: Acts 15:7-9 "Brothers you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe." [Acts 10 and 11] "God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. He made no distinction between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. As Peter speaks to Cornelius and his house the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message. (Acts 10 and 11) These men who the Holy Spirit came upon were not circumcised. So, Paul is correct that seeking to obey the law for salvation will make Christ of no profit for you. It's true. Christ is the end of the law for salvation. And Peter was not sent to the Gentiles, as a people, only to the house of Cornelius, as that scripture makes it clear. In Acts 15, some believers that belonged to the Pharisees didn't understand the Gospel accurately. They were saying the Gentiles must be circumcised and required to obey the law of Moses for salvation. It says the apostles and elders met to consider this question. Obviously they weren't clear on the matter, either. Then Peter got up and said, "Brothers you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. He made no distinction between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of of the disciples a yoke that neither we nor our fathers have been able to bear? No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are." How can it be any clearer? Salvation IS NOT OBTAINED by the Mosaic Law!!! If you break one part of it you break it all. Then where are you? And there are other Apostles besides the original twelve that walked with Christ. Should we sin since this is the case and disobey the Ten Commandments? No!!! But, our salvation/justification isn't based on how well we obey them. Our salvation is believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, that His sacrifice paid our sins. Then we receive the Holy Spirit. Then we are righteous before God. It isn't based upon how well we obey the law. Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness. He wasn't circumcised. The law wasn't given for another 400 plus years. But he was righteous in God's eyes. The gospel was preached to him before the law was given. That promise (the gospel) can't be nullified by a law given 400 years later. Sorry, but you are in error. And you make out a legitimate apostle of Jesus Christ as a fraud. The biggie is that the original twelve apostles who walked with Jesus accepted Paul as a brother. Who am I? No one. A nobody. But, I've experienced the richest measure of the Divine Presence, Ephesians 3:19 Amplified. So, my theology is sound. Otherwise that would not have occurred.

[@williamwelch7]

I agree with Zane Pierce, another fine presentation. Thank you for helping us to understand the Law. Shalom

[@paulrock4816]

There shall no one justified through the law, Law is the knowledge of sin. Law tells you you are guilty of sin but doesn't offer forgiveness. If you break any of the Law you are guilty of the whole law. At least we have a Savior named Jesus, who took our sins, & took the Law & nailing it to the cross.

[@rickbluecloud531]

@@paulrock4816 there are laws from the destroyer and the Creator in the Tanakh. The sons and daughters of the Most High are not to follow the laws of the destroyer (animal sacrifices and other laws that pertain). The word 'legalism' is not in the scriptures, but 'lawlessness' is. Those who follow man instead of Messiah regard the true followers as 'legalist' as though obedience is somehow wrong. They just don't understand gratitude...not in their nature. They only obey to avoid punishment. That's Paulism (Christians and Messianics)

[@keihlonzoterrell4269]

@@paulrock4816 you idiot! How do you think people were saved before christ. Stop peddling misinformation and lies. Your apostle was a fraud, get over it.

[@keihlonzoterrell4269]

@Tom Bladecki Your Roman diety jesus never existed. Yeshua ha mashiach, king of israel did exist. Paul was not an apostle. The gospels, book of acts, and revelations only mention 12 disciples. There is no 13th disciple/apostle. Paul was a self-proclaimed apostle and this is proven in acts. Matthias became the 12th disciple after Judas died not paul!!

[@mikefrady7965]

William Welch if you live by the law you are cursed Read Galatians spoken by our blessed apostle Paul who knew Jesus more intimately and worked more graciously for the gospel than any other apostles

[@sulongenjop7436]

Many people including pastors, priests, so called self proclaimed prophets etc are trying to behave like Paul and the apostles.....they badmouth each other, others and try to divide the followers of Jesus.😢

[@GospelOfTimothy]

Jesus said Peter would be the head of the church, the rock that was the foundation of the church, not Paul, Matthew 16: 18.

[@sonofgod9166]

Roman Catholicism theology Jesus christ is the rock and foundation

[@antiworld-ir8lu]

@@sonofgod9166 Of course Peter is the rock, otherwise it wouldn't make sense that Jesus changed his name from Simon into Peter which means rock.

[@فهدالسليم-ت9ج]

1-Well, Mr. Tim, since you admit that Peter is the rock of the church, and Peter and James were following the Mosaic law, and that Paul claimed that he saw Jesus and that he fought the disciples of Christ, do not forget that he was torturing the followers of Christ, but it did not work out with him, so he entered From the ideological side, to spoil them 2- Do these things not make the credibility of Islam strong? In that the Messiah Jesus, peace be upon him, was a follower of the Torah, he and his disciples who believed with him

[@antiworld-ir8lu]

@@فهدالسليم-ت9ج No, it doesn't since they held a council (the very first one) in which they discussed the necessity of circumcision for Gentiles and indirectly for Jews of the following generation too. It wasn't the last council since we still have the Catholic Church founded by Christ Himself which continued to follow this kind of manner to solve theological issues. It would sound kind of awkward if a Church would one have one council and that one was at the very beginning of her history.

[@GospelOfTimothy]

@@فهدالسليم-ت9ج Jesus is not the Messiah. The Jewish high priest said to Jesus, if you are the Messiah just tell us plainly. And Jesus said I already told you who I was. Before Abraham was I am. Jesus said he appeared to Abraham. When they ask Jesus if he was God he said all of you are God's. In The Apocalypse of St John when Jesus talks about his father, he says he is more than God. It all depends on how you interpret the word Messiah or the word god. Jesus was begotten so that God the spirit father could be seen.

[@nomadicrecovery1586]

Paul is a unique apostle But apostle he was Chosen DIRECTLY. From Christ Anyone denying this is not a Christian

[@genez429]

"Apostle" was not a unique word to the 12. The Romans used the same word for a commanding officer in naval battles. It means they had the top authority. Judas was included in that list in Matthew. When the church age began their function changed in a need to adjust to the new way of life in the Spirit. Judas was not there. And, Matthias was voted in before the baptism of the Holy Spirit took place. Peter while still not indwelled by the Holy Spirit and the others in their ignorance failed to realize that its God who assigns spiritual gifts. No one can vote to have a person be having a certain gift. We voted on Bob. Bob, you now be a pastor? How? God assigns the gifts. Its was a mistake that went on record and quite a few fail to see what was taking place when they drew straws. No one voted. The Lord picked Paul to replace Judas. Like it or not. Paul was both a Jew and was a Roman by citizenship. God chose Paul to oppose the horrible legalism that was manifested in the Jews at that time. Paul was fast at catching onto the new way of Life in Christ. He had to confront them because they still wanted to live as Jews did as under the Law.

[@someonesomewhere619]

i tried to validate Saul/Paul, which led me to 2 Peter, and i found the unbiased Greek not as kind to Paul as 2 Peter seems to convey. not wisdom but cleverness. not 'hard to understand' but 'nonsensical'. THEN i found out that 2 Peter wasn't even written by Peter - it's a forgery. i've read articles on jesuswordsonly.com for years, and as conservative as i am, i have to let Paul go. i hate cults. and so i hate weird stuff. but i've realized that Paulianity is the weird stuff. at the end of the day, when i say 'Yahushua said ABC', and someone else argues against it saying 'but Paul said XYZ'... it's kind of unbelievable that any believer would want to argue against Yahushua by using someone else's writings. if 2 Peter is out, then we're left with a conversion story - basically Paul's claim about himself. and tradition of Rome - the "canon" of scripture. but Yahushua and Paul conflict in so many ways... and i can't just trust Paul on what he says about himself.. and i won't trust the Roman Empire... so.. just trust Yahushua.. it may be against the mainstream but Yahushua did say the path is narrow!

[@genez429]

@@someonesomewhere619 Get a job at CNN. They like folks that don't blink when giving fake news. Other than that. Your argument was dumb and uniformed.

[@antonivsfortis]

Makes sense, they are called fishers of men so yeah sea terms used

[@genez429]

@@antonivsfortis It had nothing to do with fishing. The Roman apostles were sent out as warriors in battle on sea.

[@antonivsfortis]

@@genez429 uhhhh ig

[@caitlinsoliman1658]

Say this is true, we do not know what parts of the Bible Paul wrote. What do we follow? I find it very confusing.

[@tracieblack5548]

Paul wrote Romans Corinthians Corinthians 2 Galatians Ephesians Philippians Colossians Thessalonians 2nd Thessalonians 1 Timothy 2nd Timothy 1 Titus and Philemon

[@mus762]

Isn't it obvious Christianity is not the teachings of Jesus nor the Apostles. Christianity is the product of Paul with the backing of Roman Empire. Apostles names such as John n Mathew were used to give the Gospel some credibility. Paul was against the true teachings of Jesus. That's why he was against the Apostles, particularly Peter. Paul is a self appointed apostle and create trinity. Jesus never prayed to idols. He was circumcised. He never ate pork. He never claimed divinity as said in the Gospel of John ,I am. Gospel of John are not words of Jesus according to John. They all books fabricated in the name of Jesus and the pious Apostles. Muslims believe in the Gospel of Jesus, INJIL, not the Gospels of Mark, Luke, Mathew or John. The teachings of Paul with the backing of the Roman Empire goes against the first n second commandments of the Old Testament of which Jesus said had come to fulfill it Peace be Upon Jesus n his holy mother Mary. 2 Big names among those highly revered in the Quran.

[@mirandarogers3595]

1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

[@allentobolewski7273]

Fake-Shaul created his own "Good-news," Torah, and he even said so. FAKE-Shaul NEVER said, "YHWH told me to say,,," or "YHWH sent me,,," I.E: Rom 2:16 in the day when Elohim shall judge..., ACCORDING TO MY GOOD NEWS.

[@mirandarogers3595]

@@allentobolewski7273 That God is going to judge you According to what Paul wrote because Paul said he's going to judge you according to my gospel that if you deny that Jesus want to Paul you are denying the gospel of how you are saved and that means you are not save because Jesus want to Paul for gentiles in act chapter 26 because we Jesus come he only come for the jews matthew 15 24 they are a wrong way to follow Jesus and they are right way to follow him that is by the grace of God and Paul teachings the grace of God because the gentiles never had the law of Moses romans 2 14 throw 16 so I don't know what you are taking about the bible says in 2 timothy 2 15 to study and divide the word of truth so may the grace of our lord Jesus Christ be with you and get God true words and read it and study the bible.

[@bootsofescaping01]

So what you are saying is that the real apostle for the gentiles is Peter. Curious. Why did Peter not travel to the gentiles and teach them. Why did non of the apostles deal with Paul. I understand Gentiles = non jews however Paul allowed a lot of things from gentiles that were directly against law (idolatry) in the belief of fortifying a relationship with the gentiles and the Lord. How is that possible though if you don't obey his law... Gods law?

[@340cannabisgod]

God and Jesus said not..to give the teachings to the gentiles..it's in the bible..give not to the gentiles.

[@uriarteunited3105]

@Faisal Siraj jesus fulfilled the law already😭😭

[@HistoryandReviews]

@@uriarteunited3105 FULFILLED DOES NOT MEAN ABOLISHED NOR DESTROYED nor made void! What about that do you simpletons not understand!!! Matthew 5:17-19 what does Jesus say about the Law again hmmmmm???

[@Peter64AD]

Wow it took this guy half hour to explain that Paul hated the apostles! I would have taken 30 seconds and said just read Galatians and see how much he hated the apostles. Simple.

[@فهدالسليم-ت9ج]

1-Can you explain your position on Paul and his hostility to the disciples of Christ and why the students follow the Torah, which makes them Christian Jews, and if they are, then this destroys the Christian belief that God has three Persons The Jews do not believe that 2- I really wonder that as it is found in the New Testament that Jesus, after his departure, put matters in the hands of his disciples, especially Peter. Then someone comes who was their enemy and was torturing Jesus’ followers, then he makes up a story and says (I saw Jesus) and he fights the disciples this time intellectually and ideologically. When you read his biography and his hostility For the disciples of Christ you learn that he is a liar and a deceiver

[@فهدالسليم-ت9ج]

@@DirtExtractor 1- We Muslims believe that Jesus, peace be upon him, called people to follow the Torah and the Gospel, and he never deviated from that 2- The disciples, may God be pleased with them, are believing men who followed Jesus and believed in the messages of God that were given to His Noble Prophet 3- The Torah and the Gospel have changed from their original form, as they have been corrupted through the ages, but there are still some divine revelations in them, and God alone knows where they are. 4- More than half of the New Testament was the writings of Paul, and the Church based most of its doctrines on those texts 5- The greatest sin is polytheism, so fear God and try to think logically, because God created man and made him with logic and understanding, so how can God Almighty have three persons and at the same time they are one? The Jews do not believe in that. Is it not in your books that there was a teacher of the Torah who asked Jesus about the most important commandment, and Jesus replied to him with the Shema Israel? And that man understood it as it existed in the Torah before 6- God Almighty has abrogated the rulings of the Torah and the Gospel and gave us the Noble Qur’an that will be eternal until the Hour of Judgment By God, on that day, nothing will benefit you except your religion and your good deeds. Neither your race, nor your country, nor your friends, nor your family will benefit you. Everyone will be held accountable for his deeds. Read and do not let anyone stop you or hide texts from you. And I ask God to guide you and me until we meet our Lord while we are truly believers

[@Peter64AD]

​@@فهدالسليم-ت9ج silly Muslim who invited you into this topic. Jesus Christ was a Jew and he was son of God! Get lost Muslim

[@dorianphilotheates3769]

Ah yes; Paul, the Shyster of Tarsus, King Herod’s own first cousin

[@johnspartan98]

You blaspheme God, His word, and His Son.

[@dorianphilotheates3769]

johnspartan98 - Oh, well...whatta you gonna do? BTW, are you really a Spartan? If so, we may be related: the Spartans originated in my neck o’ the woods - Doris, in Central Greece.

[@johnspartan98]

@@dorianphilotheates3769 Spartans exemplify perfection in battle due to their wisdom that comes from rigorous training. Likewise, I know the whole Bible. Not just bits and pieces, therefore I cut to pieces all false doctrines with the Sword of the Spirit which is the word of God and faith as my shield.

[@dorianphilotheates3769]

johnspartan98 - Nice.

[@KeepingWatch95]

I have done some Googling for the Herodian family tree. I think perhaps Paul was his Grandson. Do you have any reverences for him being a first cousin?

[@JonathanRedden-wh6un]

On reading Paul, Peter, John and Jude and the Epistle to the Hebrews I find no disagreement in doctrine.

[@FigRko]

Paul was confronting those of the circumcision who where teaching just like in Acts that you can only be saved if you get circumcised. Which again we know it’s not true. It’s by Messiah. Then when we have the Torah on our hearts we follow because of our salvation not for it. I use to think Paul was against Torah when I was a trinitarian but not no more. Yeshua followed Torah and Paul followed Yeshua. Yah bless!

[@johnramirez3247]

Keeping the commandments is what jesus taught, period! Paul is a false teacher, accept it and move on.

[@here4jannah]

This a verse from the Qu'ran 😊👇 O People of the Book! Do not go to extremes regarding your faith; say nothing about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger of Allah and the fulfilment of His Word through Mary and a spirit ˹created by a command˺ from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers and do not say, “Trinity.” Stop!-for your own good. Allah is only One God. Glory be to Him! He is far above having a son! To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And Allah is sufficient as a Trustee of Affairs. Al-Qur'an [4:171] If you have any doubts about Islam and Christianity I'm happy to help, ✌️

[@joeyandrews1400]

nice presentation i already threw out most of the books of the new testament and am left only with the 3 gospels of Mark, Luke and Matthew and the Tanakh and believe Jesus meant to live according the covenant and his teachings.

[@suzettee5202]

Are you aware that Luke was a close friend of Paul and not an eye-witness to Jesus testimony? Matthew and John are the only ones that wrote their testimony down of their time with Jesus.

[@joeyandrews1400]

@@suzettee5202 none of the gospels we have are written down by the disciples themselves because they were written in greek and even the main 4 gospels tell a different story so which story is the correct one. i believe the teachings are meant to follow the Jewish laws and to me Jesus is not certainly not God himself and the Son of God maybe but then he still failed miserably by the lying, deceiving, murder, genocide of the Christian churches and the fact that every 10 seconds an innocent child dies of hunger or decease.

[@suzettee5202]

@@joeyandrews1400 So you can't accept that maybe God can protect His words and testimony and His disciples write it down regardless of the language they used and God was incapable of translating His words through a servant of His? He does not cause lying, deceiving, murder or genocide or even the innocent child that dies of hunger or disease. Satan is the god of this world and he is delighted when humans blame God for his evil doing.

[@AnHebrewChild]

Suzette E well said

[@strikemaster1]

Joey... you do well sir! But leave out John at your own risk.

[@bibledefinedbymartycozad]

Apostles twelve Jhn 6:70 Yeshua answered them, Have I not chosen you TWELVE, and one of you is a devil? John 15:27 And you also will bear witness because you have been with me from the beginning. John 21:24 This is the disciple who is bearing witness about these things. Mat 19:28 Yeshua said to them, Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on His glorious throne, YOU who have FOLLOWED Me will also sit on TWELVE thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Acts 1:21 So, ONE of the men who have ACCOMPAINED us during ALL the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, Acts 2:14 But Peter standing up with the eleven lifted up his voice and said. Acts 1:23,24 And they appointed two Joseph called Barsabbas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias, 24. And they prayed and said, thou Lord, which knows the hearts of all men, show whether these two thou has chosen, (Yeshua is very clear. Twelve Apostles. He had two back up men) **There was no, room, for Paul from the start, he can NOT be an apostle** Acts 6:2 And the TWELVE summoned the full number of disciples and said, (church was going and Paul was not in the picture) Acts 8:1b They were all scattered through the region of Judea and Samaria, EXCEPT the apostles. (Paul's persecution on the church; the true Apostles was not afraid of him) Acts 10:39 Peter said, “we are witness of all that He did, etc. Jude 17b But you must remember, beloved, the predictions of the apostles OF our Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus never said, “go and make apostles”. Jh 1:1,2 We declare to you what was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands, concerning the word of life. 2 This life was revealed, we have seen it and TESTIFY to it, and declare to you the eternal life that was with the Father and was revealed to us. Rev1 :1b,2 He made it known by sending to His servant John, who bore witness to the Word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw. Mat 13:11 And Yeshua said, “ To you has been given the secret of the Kingdom of God,

[@LoveAcrossAmerica]

I pray more people had eyes to see and ears to hear. Paul was obviously a false self-proclaimed apostle. It sickens how he has infiltrated the gospel.

[@frankthompson6503]

There was Matthew chapter 10 v 1 Luke chapter 10 v 1 Acts chapter 2 v 1 to 13 Pentecost the 120 where given the holy spirit. v 41 on the same day Pentecost another 3000 disciples were added. Joel chapter 2 v 28 to 32 On in the last days I shall pour out my spirit on your son's and daughter's. Matthew 😢 chapter 28 v 18 Go into the entire world preaching and teaching and healing. Therefore the 12,70,120,3000 disciples have all got the same authority that raised Jesus from the dead. Isaiah chapter 53 v 4 to 5 by his stripes Jesus you were healed. 1 Peter 2 v 24 by his stripes Jesus you are healed.

[@queendove6376]

The true Apostles of Jesus Christ were not in agreement with Paul. In fact they were very upset with Pauls teaching and they rebuked him and he separated himself from them. Paul spoke against God's Torah and against the teaching of Christ and the teaching Jesus taught His Apostles. Many ministers and people claiming to be of Christ have been deceived by these teaching mainly because it is in the Bible. Being in the Bible should not be enough to convince you if someone calls themselves something that God had chosen them too.. God allows us to choose and all you have to do is read Pauls LETTERS and pray and accept the truth. You will see clearly that he has his own teachings and he wants you to follow him and believe in his teachings which are contrary and contradictory to Jesus's teachings. Paul (like Satan) wants you to obey and serve him. He wants you to believe in him and his teachings. His teachings are deceiving because he uses some truth mixed with lies and that is how he will get you. His goal (as Satan's) is to get you to believe in him and that he is God. He does not want you to believe he is Satan, then you will not be deceive. Jesus clearly told us, in the book of John chapters 15-17 to obey His disciples and His teachings. Just listen to Pauls letters and you will hear and see, he wants to be served. Do not allow him and his minister to continue to deceive you. The churches kicked Paul out. You need to do the same. Read those letters and ask who is Paul talking about and too. God's chosen Apostles who did not follow him and those teachings of his.

[@itlupe]

You forgot 10:5-15. This is the doctrine of the apostles. Go to the JEWS and teach them salvation through baptism. Note 19:28 - "...judging the twelve tribes of ISRAEL..." the tribulation Paul was given the gospel to the gentiles (salvation by grace alone). Nope. Peter was chosen to show that the gentiles are also accepted into the fold. Acts 1-7 the word is taken to the Jews. In Chapter 7 Israel rejects Christ. Acts 10/11 and following is Paul going to the gentiles (the church age). God will deal with the Jews during the tribulation and after.

[@seekingGODs-YHWHsTruth144K]

Paul was not a false prophet he was just too complicated for some to understand he taught that faith alone saves but he also taught that we establish the law through faith he never taught against circumcision but taught what is the point of being physically circumcised if you are not spiritually circumcised 🗡📖💯♥️🙏

[@jasondacalio7760]

Paul was an apostle, Timothy, Apollo, Priscilla, Aquilla, Onesimus. Most of these believers were martyed for Yahushua. Don't you think that early church Fathers- 1st,2nd,3rd centuary debated all what you claim. You claim a lot, yet you have not shed blood for the Name of Jesus, how many time you have been stoned by the synagoue of satan-pharisee/masorites, beaten by roman soldiers, shipwreck, forsaken, whip by the roman authorities, starving.

[@laurasilverstone9735]

Quit denouncing the apostles in the Bible, including Paul, Paul was not always understood, but that doesnt make him a false apostle

[@laurasilverstone9735]

@Truth Hurts then you dont understand Paul's letters

[@laurasilverstone9735]

@Truth Hurts at least, when we see JESUS CHRIST HAMASHIACH, HE won't ask if we understood the law, but if we accepted His bloods atonement

[@laurasilverstone9735]

@Truth Hurts but we dont have to understand everything, but to know we are a sinner and to repent, then when we have the HOLY GHOST/ SPIRIT, HE TEACHES US AND LEADS US INTO ALL TRUTH

[@laurasilverstone9735]

@Truth Hurts no, the salvation given is not contingent on understanding the law or the Torah, but salvation comes when we repent and accept JESUS CHRIST HAMASHIACH bloods atonement, then when we get baptized in JESUS CHRIST NAME and receive the HOLY GHOST/SPIRIT, He will teach us

[@laurasilverstone9735]

@Truth Hurts yes to believing, but understanding is different

[@Alatinable]

Have you hear of the NASB bible? It is as close to a direct word for word translation of the original text as humanly possible. It uses the collective knowledge of ancient aramaic to give the closest translation we can get. Pick one up and reread some of what you are talking about.

[@bosszonke7390]

I believe deep in our hearts there is something that really tells us that Paul was really a messenger of Christ👀🥺

[@jesseljones4991]

We wouldn’t need something deep in our hearts to tell us Paul was really a messenger of Christ if we would simply believe the Word of God.

[@paulrock4816]

Yes, he was Acts 9:15 A chosen vessel of Mine to bear my name before the gentiles.

[@paulrock4816]

He was a chosen vessel for the gentiles Acts 9:15; he received the right hand of fellowship of the 12 to go to the gentiles Gal 2:7-9. Given his gospel of grace Gal 1:11, Peter backed Paul Acts 15:7-11, & 2nd Peter 3:15,16. Make no mistake Paul is to the gentile what Peter was to the Jew. Gal 2:7.

[@brownsugar6231]

@@paulrock4816 You people make things worse. He Paul was what to the Gentiles ? The disciples were told that non were to go unto the Gentiles nor the Samaritans but rather the house of the "lost sheep of Israel" ! To believe your tales is one thing but to sell it as truth to other's, especially when yall clearly need to investigate and understand the words of the Bible . Jesus was not a Universal Prophet sent to the world,it is a figment of the imagination you've been indoctrinated with !

[@klassinator]

When I begin the video, I fully expected you to do some mental gymnastics to try to fit Paul into the teachings of Jesus despite the evidence you first laid out, but I was relieved to hear how honest you are about Paul. Thank you and may the Holy Spirit keep you.

[@peggypiercefield5188]

You can't tell me there are no conflicts between church leaders today. But your explanations don't even sound like conflict. Paul was saying we don't have to follow Levitical laws but rather the commandments. Jesus said his commands were to love God and love others as ourself. But we are supposed to still follow the important commandments. Paul was killed because he loved Jesus.

[@mkamalarahman5639]

How do you know Saul loved Jesus? Have you met him? If he preached other than the injil and hated Jewish circumcision, is it means, he loved Jesus? Jesus also had the circumcision.

[@KeepingWatch95]

John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, *If a man love me, he will keep my words:* and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. John 14:24 *He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings:* and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me. _Paul does not keep Jesus' sayings._

[@KeepingWatch95]

_Paul proclaims (in 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy) I am “ordained/appointed” to be a preacher, an apostle, and a teacher._ *1 Timothy 2:7 Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.* *2 Timothy 1:11 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.* _For those that are not well studied with Jesus' commandments, the error(s) in what Paul has proclaimed can be easily overlooked._ _Here are some of Jesus's commandments:_ *Matthew 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, Christ; and all ye are brethren.* *Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.* *Matthew 23:10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, Christ.* (Matthew 23:8 & 10 Master,G2519) καθηγητής From a compound of G2596 and G2233; a guide, that is, (figuratively) a teacher: - master. _In Matthew 23:8 Jesus makes it clear he is the one Teacher (for one is your [Teacher], Christ)_ _In Matthew 23:10 Jesus makes it clear to neither be called teachers (Neither be ye called [teachers])._ _Also in verse 10 Jesus repeats what he had just said in verse 8. (...for one is your [Teacher], Christ)_ _Paul fails to keep Jesus' commandment “neither be ye called [teachers]...” even (in the same verse and in conjunction) as he proclaims himself to be an apostle._ _In other words; Paul is breaking Jesus' commandment not to be called teacher(s) at the same time as declaring himself as an apostle._ *1 Timothy 2:7 Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.* _Paul repeats this claim as an apostle and a teacher in 2 Timothy 1:11._ *2 Timothy 1:11 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.* _Once again Paul is breaking Jesus' commandment not to be called teacher(s) all while claiming himself to be an apostle._ _Furthermore in 2 Timothy Paul proclaims; _*_“ Whereunto I am appointed...”_* *#1 Question:* _Who had appointed Paul “a teacher;” after Jesus had instructed not to be called such; in_ Matthew 23:10 *Neither be ye called [teachers]: for one is your [Teacher], Christ.* _Paul claims likewise in 1 Timothy 2:7 _*_Whereunto I am ordained..._* Moreover *#1 Question:* _Who (against Jesus' commandment of (Matt __23:10__) not to be called a teacher) “ordained” and or “appointed” Paul as “a teacher?”_ _None of Jesus' disciples would have had the authority to break any of Jesus' commandments, and to go and “ordained” or “appointed” Paul as “a teacher.”_ *_#2 Question:_*_ Or is it perhaps, we are to believe that Jesus broke his own commandment and came to Paul privately (came to him secretly as it were) and “ordained” and “appointed” Paul as “a teacher” against Jesus' own commandment?_ *_#3 Question_*_ Or worst, should we assume that God “ordained” and “appointed” Paul as “a teacher” against Jesus' commandment? However If this were true (being beforehand Jesus declared he is our one Teacher; for one is your Teacher, Christ) this would mean God “ordained” and “appointed” Paul in the position of an Antichrist (which means in the place of Christ or instead of Christ.)_ _The above questions are mere speculations which seemingly can not fit as explanations as to Paul's claims._ _The important fact to remember is; for in effort to conform with Paul's statements (found in 1 Timothy 2:7 and 2 Timothy 1:11) it is of a necessity to break Jesus' commandment; _*_Neither be ye called [teachers]: for one is your [Teacher], Christ._*

[@Swordoftruth289]

It sounds like Paul was the first messianic reformist. Or revisionist?