Celestron 10X50 Vs Vangaurd 12X50 Vs Skymaster 15X70 Vs Nikon 16X50 Binoculars - Which is the Best?

A side by side comparison of Celestron 10X50 Vs Vangaurd 12X50 Vs Skymaster 15X70 Vs Nikon 16X50 Binoculars.
#nikon
#celestron
#vanguard
#binoculars
Celestron Upclose 10X50 Binoculars: amzn.to/3X5ihOI
Vangaurd VEO ED 12X50 Binoculars: amzn.to/43O4o9J
Celestron Skymaster 15X70 Binoculars: amzn.to/43QjHi1
Nikon 16X50 Binoculars: amzn.to/3Njk4MO
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This video is for educational purpose
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Music : Steps by Anno Domini Beats
Source : KZbin Creator
License : free to use

[@umer111wani6]

Without saying a single word,you resolved the delima of first time binocular buyers.

[@science_sir]

You're welcome 🙏

[@emopunkrockerepr]

very well put. This - is quality work!

[@PureAwareness76]

​@@science_sir 🎉 Sir, you are genious! ❤

[@tdapple1]

My goodness. Absolutely beautiful Review. Thank you 🙏. Nikon 16x50 is in a league of its own. WoW.

[@DieTabbi]

Why?

[@billmorrigan386]

@@DieTabbi Because of the brand name and especially the price tag. People care only about price tags. I wouldn't buy or use 15x magnification binoculars for terrestrial observations. It's gonna shake too much. The ones with image stabs are of course fine even at 20x, e.g. Canon. More than 50mm lenses are not needed for terrestrial viewing either. *Large lens binoculars are needed only for astronomy,* they also have to have an optimal exit pupil (around 7mm) size which means the lowest magnifications possible. Of course if the night is not dark enough or there's too much "light pollution"(almost everywhere nowadays), nothing is gonna help. Best binos for astronomy are 7x50, 12x70 and 10x70. They are needed for DSOs (deep sky objects like galaxies, nebulae, star clusters). Planets can be watched even from the city with a lot of light pollution. All you need is a sturdy tripod with fine adjustments (for tracking the planet manually) and a telescope with like 100x and at least 80mm lens but such a telescope is almost useless when it comes to DSOs, although buying a 40mm eyepiece (it will give the lowest magnification possible and the largest exit pupil to collect most of the light) remedies the situation a little bit. Especially useless for DSOs are the most expensive Cassagrains -- just too much magnification which results in a very small exit pupil. Disclaimer: Nikon binos are excellent as well as cameras. I myself use Nikon cameras and love them but I'm not brand loyal. I use binos mainly for astronomy. For terrestrial purposes 7x40 or 10x40 is enough. Of course a pair of binoculars with a stab and high magnification is worth it IMO if you need it but the field of view will be much, much smaller.

[@Kpaojd]

​@@billmorrigan386 is it possible to handhold 12x binos for plane spotting?

[@billmorrigan386]

@@Kpaojd Yes, of course. That said, shake is above average at x12. It also depends on how steady you can hold binoculars. Longer (bigger) ones are easier to hold steady if you hold them close to the objective lens and lean the eyepieces against your eyes. However some people find it uncomfortable or difficult to hold heavier binoculars. I have the 12x70 Celestron and it's pretty steady when I hold them the way I just described. I guess I can even get away with 15x70 but it's gonna be a lot of shake anyway. You should try different magnifications by visiting some store. It's even possible to use x20 but the shake is very strong and horrible. Yet, you will still be able to see an airplane with very shaky/jerky viewing. So the question is how much shake we can tolerate. I say x15 is the upper limit but for a quick glance x20 may also work. So I don't recommend magnifications above x15 while x12 is relatively nice but it's all relative. Small shake is only at around x7 but that's not much of magnification. I also don't recommend zoom binoculars because the field of view (FOV) is terrible on them. Even zoomed out, they usually have 1.5-2 times smaller FOVs vs non-zoom binoculars. Yet, airplanes or helicopters are very small targets that don't require large FOVs. So a pairs of zoom binoculars might be a good option for watching flying planes. I would not recommend going past x20 though. Say, 8-20x50 or 8-20x40 would be nice. It means you can change magnification from x8 to x20. While they are superb for plane-spotting, FOVs are terrible on zoom binoculars. It means for most other purposes they will suck. People just buy them because their specs look cool: you can have any magnification you like. Folks forget or don't know that FOVs will suck on such binoculars. The ideal solution is stabilized optics like on Canon binoculars. The latter means the price will be 5-10 times higher. I'm afraid you won't see a lot of detail on flying planes with x12. Overall, x12 binoculars are an excellent choice for terrestrial viewing.

[@billmorrigan386]

@@DieTabbi Personally for plane-spotting I would buy something like a Celestron 15x70 or even 15-35x70 for a quick glance at a plane at much higher magnifications. That's because I can hold a much longer/bigger binocular steadier and because large magnifications are needed for flying planes while FOV doesn't matter. A good choice would also be 15x50 or 16x40 or something like that because 12x40 or 12x50 will yield less appealing viewing of planes/helicopters. Also note that non-zoom binoculars produce more detailed viewing. Also larger lens binoculars produce more detailed viewing (more resolution). For example, the 15-35x70 has such huge lenses that you won't loose any resolution. The only problem will be shake and loss of FOV due to excessive magnification and zoom respectively.

[@ROForeverMan]

Why does the image suddenly zooms when you look through the Nikon ?

[@kanedmx]

cause its paid video from nkon...Science Sir is fooling us

[@_Alfa.Bravo_]

... try a LEICA or ZEISS or Eschenbach Farlux from Germany ... they are Benz class on watch us from space ...

[@fauzulazim2993]

This is THE BEST review I've ever seen, Other KZbinrs talk a lot of trash and BS but here we are given actual vision. Thanks mate! 👍

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@johnwaithera7818]

Now,this is what is called review,not just my fellow youtubers copy pasting speeches.welldone

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@johnwaithera7818]

Hi.am a safari driver in kenya.can I use Nikon 16x50 to watch/look at a lion 100mtrs away or is it so powerful that the image count be good?

[@larrydunn4626]

7:22. look at the stairs coming down on the left side of the 4 story building. With the Celestron 15x70 you can't even tell they're stairs... now look at the nikon. you get actual stairs.

[@strangerous1313]

Now look at the price tag.

[@larrydunn4626]

@@strangerous1313 yes, stairs are not cheap.

[@meenayadav5922]

All the stairs become visible Great Deductive skills u got there

[@ananda3166]

Indeed Nikon is the winner

[@AhmadFauzi-pd2tb]

I can see stairs too in celestron g2 10x50 , whats your point? This comparison cant be used as benchmark

[@farhankhan8938]

Excellent video. The best way to compare the features of different binoculars. This video has resolved my problem of buying the right binoculars. Many thanks.

[@science_sir]

Many thanks 🙏

[@lifeisgolden01]

Just out of interest...which ones did you purchase in the end...I'm thinking of 12x50

[@CarlosSilva-gc8ny]

Excelente demostración, gracias por compartir.

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@nareshbhandari5456]

I want to buy zoom with sharp view, 10×22×50 or nikon action 16×50,what u recommend

[@rohit1011]

Men see video Men happy Men see price men dishappy.

[@Sir-Kay]

I currently own Nikon 12x50 Action EX & before I got this I had the 16x50 ones, have you noticed massive light reflection issues around the edges too due to the Multi-coated lenses as opposed to Fully Multi-coated that is supposed to eliminate that issue?

[@TheLiveNature]

Hello , nice sharing , i liked this 👍 , new subscribe +🔔 & full watching 7:44 🎬, have a nice days ♻️☘️🍀✅🌳

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@66090800]

was soll hier gezeigt werden alle bilder wackeln wie von einem rollei stativ mal was ordentliches kaufen!!!

[@DarkAnonimOfficial]

16×50 by Nikon

[@garyjones2582]

I have a smaller pr of Nikon's... They have great optics...

[@narkarviraj]

This was one the best review. You kept it very simple.

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@arturobayangos1223]

Nikon is best for clarity .

[@highaf0]

This guy got brain, that is why this interview is different

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@gaurdiantome8352]

Because I guess something happened as I got here

[@gaurdiantome8352]

You lord

[@gaurdiantome8352]

Oh, right Lord

[@blagushkin2114]

Глупо сравнивать оптику от Nikon с низкобюджетными стекляшками.

[@georgecarlinismytribe]

Nikon shot seems to be taken at a different time. Look at the lower floor of the house complex on the right. There seems to be something white covering the bottom of the windows, that isn't visible in all three of the other shots. If so, maybe those stairs to the left of the building, which people are pointing out, were illuminated from a different angle due to the different time of day, and/or more direct sunshine.

[@billmorrigan386]

You are spot on. Good point. Celestrons were used when the stairs were darker and the camera smudged them. Celestrons are not that bad. Actually the Celestron 15x70 would have outresolved slightly all 15x50 competitors (even $1000 binos) if the test had been fair. At 2:37 I can clearly see the stairs even on the 10x50. So stairs have different illumination for sure to justify the price of the Nikon and Vanguard. It's just people blow it all out of proportion. I mean if something is not $1000, it's a piece of sh..t. That's why it's even been shot on the iPhone. Some people do it even on purpose. However I did like this video and I gave it a like. It's common practice in ads to belittle or exaggerate slightly. I have no problem with it. I even expect it from all advertisements. This channel (like a shop) shows various equipment and brands and that's a huge plus. I hate it when somebody just respects Rolex, iPhone, Leica and Vinyl LP records. It's not just crazy. It's snobbish and it's utterly moronic!

[@GulshaniqbalKhattak]

No need for further resurch going for Nikon Tnx

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@billlee2361]

Nikon 16X50 Binoculars best.

[@diwakarlohani5686]

Yes

[@davidmorley7417]

Best example I've seen, now I know what I'm looking for, I'm a biginer, thank you 👍

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@mindsetnewmind878]

Nikon the best

[@hernanURS]

Hola yo tengo unos zenit 20x50 sería mejor en aumento ? Que estos modelos ?!

[@evercarranza6863]

Me encanta de la forma en la q está explicado todo ,otros solo enseñan por fuera pero no demuestran lo q puede hacer el producto,

[@Bender-Zadunaysky]

Был у меня Nikon 16X50 это лучший бинокль что у меня был. Просветленная оптика, в сумерках видно как днем.

[@wolfgangLuciano1]

Nixon is the best

[@georgecarlinismytribe]

The one with best focus and the least chromatic aberration seems to be the Celestron. I'd personally favour crisp focus and lack of chromatic aberration over sheer magnification, especially for star gazing.

[@mesutyldz4169]

İf you are a binocular buyer this is the best review video and result is very clear Nikon.Thanks for help.

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@TheExplorer-44]

Skymaster and Nikon are head to head

[@userone4236]

nice video , thank you man

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@PureAwareness76]

🎉 Sir, you are genious! ❤

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@elliotguerro7612]

El mejor video con la mejor explicacion de lo que cada producto ofrece. Yo uso los Celestron y me encantan pero creo que voy a comprar los Nikon. Muchas gracias por el video.

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@av_naturasmr]

Wanna try this on s24 ultra 10x zoom

[@editMota]

thank u for this beautiful comparison!!

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@emopunkrockerepr]

very good video. quality work. thanks a lot!

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@venkatramji9618]

Great stuff and effort

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@gulfrazawan415]

Wao good

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@karamchand2211]

All Nikon models are best

[@suddhashilmukhuty8836]

Nikon the best

[@OrpiAktar-g1y]

Harris Larry Gonzalez Mary Martin Donald

[@raulsalazar6822]

iPhone 15 pro mas 100x😂😂😂😂

[@joseramirollanosparrales8761]

En los últimos dos hace el acercamiento con el celular es falso que se vea así de cerca no queremos que nos engañes asta se ve que le acerca con el teléfono

[@AHSith-ci4ct]

good😊😊

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@anjachan]

thank you so much for the video and beautiful place in india. 💛

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@anjachan]

@@science_sir I ordered the skymaster.

[@science_sir]

All the best :)

[@GILSON300LBM]

Nikon é muito show de bola mas aqui no Brasil custa uma verdadeira fortuna 😢

[@zingzing8915]

Sky master is the beast

[@OlegGoud]

Cool review! After reading the description, I immediately realized from the performance characteristics of the models that Nikon would be the leader and that Vangaurd would be much worse. Nikon has vast experience in the production of ultra-long focus lenses 400mm 500mm 600mm 800mm

[@lorangaross6337]

Вот это нормальный обзор. )

[@wahidkazi1076]

So it means 16x is distance and 50 is mm size of lens It’s great work bro appreciate it ❤

[@science_sir]

16x is the magnification means the size of the image of the subject will gets increased by 16x times when viewed through the binoculars 🙏

[@wahidkazi1076]

@@science_sir oh thank s

[@misaelescobarruiz1193]

Muy buenos binoculares yo tengo unos de 10 x 50 y unos Celestron de 25 x 100 muy potentes

[@johny.pramanik57]

You deserve more subscriber

[@kamran4994]

Thanks for video. Respect 🙏

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@abunedal4975]

check the distance again ! its less than 2000 meters from the cliff taking the hight , the houses called captins paradise any one can measure the distance in google earth

[@mixaart4373]

nikon огонь! 🫡

[@ananda3166]

Superb view from nikon 16*50 its worth the money. But is it true more magnification brings less light to the object. I am confused between nikon 10*50 and 16*50. Dont know which one to buy. My purpose is just casual watching, plane spotting and yeah at night for astronomy. Can you please suggest. Thank you

[@DavidCortes-rv4ex]

donde ay un servicio técnico de selectron en chile ya que mis vinculares esta descalibrado es un selectron gracias

[@wahidkazi1076]

Sir as you replied me so please make a information video about the binoculars and monoculars so we can understand what kind of this better for us

[@СтоянЙорданов-о1ц]

Very well done video. I only doubt that the distance to that villa is 6500 meters. It looks to me like no more than 1200-1500 meters.

[@chandrasekhar630]

Content ❤ i subscribed you❤

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@Wxcvbn456]

Wall-e ! 😄

[@mainmchoonjoismeayaahoon8922]

Canon is the sharpest?

[@Mas_JeEN]

Link harga?

[@hudson8074]

The 15x and 16x times looks like they were shot during an earthquake

[@parthapratimnath1998]

This should be the review what you did.......amazing....very much precise.Thanks.

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@Николай-т2ш9й]

Ну что я понял, по краям картинки, ни на одном бинокле, качества нет.. и особенного ничего нет и по середине... А так в общем нормально... Представляю диссторсию по краям, если смотреть в оба окуляра, если в один и то, уже замыливания видно...

[@Abomohamed-o6f]

اريد شراء كمية❤❤❤

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@elmoribeiro]

Do you find the 12x50 too unstable to use without the tripod?

[@Kpaojd]

Same question

[@Jaberfra1]

Que bueno seria la relación de precios

[@swashington942]

200/1

[@jdbdbdbdbdbhxhdhdhdh8679]

What is the price of Nikon in US dollars?

[@py3ltk]

Deduzo que o skymaster 25x70 deva ser interessante... tirando o peso

[@wangnb]

Great video!

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@ahmetkizmazz]

because its have extra ıphone 11 zoom ??

[@ujwalapawar5990]

❤

[@delanglo2]

Nice test, thanks a lot!

[@science_sir]

You're welcome. God bless 🙏

[@tourjak]

Top.... 👌👌👌👌😎

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@nirajkumardas4347]

Can we see clear image through any of these binoculars of within 1km distance object? Please respond.

[@jayesh5131]

Of course, even with the first Binocular shown here.

[@nirajkumardas4347]

@@jayesh5131 can you please tell how much that binocular will cost? Fr where we can purchase it?

[@jasskaur-uw2sr]

Nikon. 16×50.prize

[@sachinmore8938]

Awesome!

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@marcelvaive9732]

Hi Science Sir, wonder if my Zoom 9x-27x50 is a good binocular for sky whatshing. I admit that I don't realy understant the numbers indicated on my binocular, for instant 9? x-27?x50?. I know that they are distances, buty what distances actualy? I'm using a tripod for my binocular. Thank you for advice.🙂

[@science_sir]

Those numbers are for magnification of the image and the objective lens diameter. For example: 10x50 means the binoculars can magnify an image by 10 times and have objective lens diameter 50mm.

[@marcelvaive9732]

@@science_sir Thank you for your response. So the numbers -27(check the - before 27)X50 could mean 27 times 50 = 1350 FT? But the 9X what ? Are there any web sites that explain how to read the numbers on the Zoom 9x-27x50. I have check the Zoom web site, but there is no information about this situation that I consider basique information on how to understand the numbers to read on a binocular. I suppose for those who have binoculars that is not a problem since everyone should already know this. Have a nice day.

[@Norbitek25]

@@marcelvaive9732They have a zoom from 9x to 27x.

[@Norbitek25]

Zoom binoculars are not recommended for sky watching.

[@marcelvaive9732]

@@Norbitek25 Yes I finaly understood how to read the numbers on the Z00M binocular. the 9X -27x 9 times to 27 times. When I move the andle on the right side of the lens ot the binocular , it move the lens on the left side of the binocular, so it does the zoom I need to see the object at a distance from 9 timesto the number of distance I need. Thank you for your reply. Have a nice ending day.☺

[@somanshusingh7209]

15 is better than 16 ??

[@yingcracker7513]

wow~ it very COO!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[@juanmanuelJG]

¿16x50 es mejor?

[@satishd2749]

Hi mate is it Nikon Aculon or Action binoculars or Nikon Prostaff binoculars. Please message

[@science_sir]

Nikon action🙏

[@satishd2749]

@@science_sir so it's not Aculon series

[@satishd2749]

@@science_sir Nikon Action 16 x 50 is very expensive say Aus $350 , but the image is stable please let me know. Thank you

[@science_sir]

@satishd2749 more the magnification, more unstable the image will be. For best results form 16x, we need to mount the bino on the tripod 🙏

[@satishd2749]

@@science_sir ok Thank you mate

[@aleksandrmorozov2678]

Какое стекло у бинокля,соответствует ли BAK 4?

[@IqbalLone-bm2bj]

Canwe adjust zoom?

[@theicebreaker1198]

Excellent content

[@yathindraattavar1459]

Cost?

[@rehanchaudhury2017]

How far is the distance ?

[@Noah-we6hm]

6.5 km or 4 miles

[@tahaiqbal427]

Was it really 6.5 kms straight line distance?

[@Bostologia]

well, if not a straight line, it was still longer than 6,5 km, use trigonometry to find that out

[@luispatricio5919]

Façam um teste com os Pentax Júpiter 16×50. 🥸

[@science_sir]

I will definitely try 🙏

[@luispatricio5919]

@@science_sir 😁😸🥸🙂

[@ОлегКадура-з8ж]

Между 10 крат и 15, разницы не большая.

[@yuri_russo]

То что вы видите в 15х, вы увидите и в 10х. Изображение будет чуть меньше и меньше мелких деталей будет видно. В 15х хорошо видны автомобили, на 10х они едва заметны. Если в 10х можно наблюдать с рук, то в 15х желательно иметь штатив. Для панорамных наблюдений лучше 10х и меньшей кратности, для точечного наблюдения 15х и выше. Чем больше кратность, тем меньше поле зрения.

[@ОлегКадура-з8ж]

@@yuri_russo благодарю.

[@luispatricio5919]

Entre 10 e 15 vezes, você não nota diferença ??? Eu cá noto uma grande diferença. 🤔🙄🧐🥸

[@vadim_248]

👍👍👍👍

[@science_sir]

🙏

[@huseyiny1358]

Greetings, I have a question for friends who are experienced in this field. As an amateur, I enjoy watching nature and the sky. To start, I was torn between Nikon Aculon 10x50 vs 12x50. Which one would you recommend and under what conditions?

[@sarthak6556]

Can't see any Fujinon binoculars in the comparison. Could you add them for a better understanding of the best ones?

[@Arklei]

Excelent video! Congrats mate!

[@science_sir]

🙏