Perpetual motion water Wheel - Bhaskara's Wheel- What does the Maths tell us? Should it work?!

[@RogueLegend999]

If you have formulas written in that excel spread sheet, would you mind sharing it?

[@RemnantRev]

What if you used an even number of arms, 12 or 14. Seems that you need an equal number to get to equilibrium. If I had 3 arms, eventually due to gravity, two would go to the bottom and one would go to the top

[@eviljigglypuff2254]

I’ve wondered for awhile, that if your arms were weighted on the end to shift the center of gravity, but also have each arm sealed on the sides and submerge the whole wheel in water. If you installed a one way valve in the bottom left allowing air to only come in, wouldn’t the additional help of the air rising to move the wheel push it enough more to complete the cycle?

[@explorationsinenergy8581]

Where would the air come in from?

[@eviljigglypuff2254]

@@explorationsinenergy8581 Outside the tank. I’m not sure how the vacuum would be produced now that I think about it, or where the water would be displaced to, to make room for the air.

[@explorationsinenergy8581]

@@eviljigglypuff2254 there is a known engine driven by temp difference, so half in water half out temp differential drives it..look that up

[@ItsVct]

How would it work out if you change the shape from a tub to a beaker shape

[@explorationsinenergy8581]

Will always achieve equilibrium, this isnt the answer imo!

[@jitparmar224]

This is not possible because you have not worked on potential energy and kinetic energy

[@andrewjenkinson7052]

Any follow up, please?

[@explorationsinenergy8581]

Yes I built it and it didn't work, the system will always achieve an equilibrium and the sloshing of the liquid has negative impacts. Will post the updated videos when I get a moment. All videos showing it working imo are frauds.

[@explorationsinenergy8581]

Results video now up.

[@andrewjenkinson7052]

Thank you.

[@andrewjenkinson7052]

Even though it did not work do you think it might improve a wind turbine for example i.e. does it run for LONGER than without?

[@explorationsinenergy8581]

@@andrewjenkinson7052 No the water wheel will always find an equilibrium point it isn't the answer. Look up the Betz limit and also how the Dyson Bladeless fan works. A design that redirects a portion of the windflow behind the blades of the turbine, by surrounding the blades with ducting, may improve efficiency by lowering the air pressure behind the fans/ speeding up the airflow behind it. Otherwise the Betz limit is around 58% efficiency.

[@donsenor9333]

muy facil, si funcionara ya se estaria fabricando.

[@explorationsinenergy8581]

Not always, big oil has always bought and shelved technology that undermines their ability to keep charging us money. The world we live in is not one we should be, we still generate electricity by methods 130 years old...

[@jitparmar224]

I can prove that Bhaskar wheel is fake. I have already calculation on the basis of trigonometry

[@AntonioFidanzio]

questo modo di fare il moto perpetuo non vale niente perche non e applicabile pe fare funzionare un sistema meccanico invece se viene fatto con un sistema di leve(6) con qualcosa che non posso dire (SEGRETO) ottengo la rotazione 1 a 1PARTO con un motore di 1.5KW che fa 1400 giri che vengono ridotti a 40 che sono uguali in uscita dove gollego un generatore dopo avere moltiplicato i giri a 1600 che mi da 13KW dove collego altri attrezzi che posso creare una centrale elettrica a costo zero si autoalimenta