The BEST Lenses For Nikon Z-Mount

[@PetaPixel]

There are a few small errors in this one, which we apologize for. They are related to a product name or photo, but we hope Chris was able to make it clear which he was referring to. If you have any confusion, please check out the full list of lenses here: petapixel.com/2024/06/30/the-best-lenses-for-nikon-z-mount/

[@PetaPixel]

And yes, we are aware the Plena costs more than $2 (unfortunately).

[@corykphotography]

@@PetaPixel haha if you have one for $2, then dreams really do come true

[@cyanproductions6047]

​@@PetaPixel i wont mind buying your plena for 2 dollars

[@saibhargavamanda1062]

Nikon need to start making hybrid lenses. 1.4S line primes hybrid zooms like canon with PZ adapter

[@am4kar]

Just $2 for the Plena ??? Now that's a steal that beats the 35mm f/1.4 Z !

[@the_wiki9408]

7:50 a bargain!

[@dw.in.michigan]

Please provide a link for the $2 135mm Plena. 😅

[@marcel9568]

And the.noct is 4.4 pounds. In weight, not sterling.

[@jzzfan1]

I’ll spring for that Plena and I don’t even have a Nikon.

[@jlwilliams]

That's $2 Canadian, or US $2,496.95 at current exchange rates.

[@nomanCyclewala]

for all the budget conscious Z shooters, 40MM F2 is an incredible value as it is a balance between 35 and 50mm.

[@HeikoBertram]

Not only because of budget. These lenses are tiny. For me that’s their selling point!

[@jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas]

@@HeikoBertram Yes, Nikon could do more pancakes such as the 26 mm f/2.8. I always liked the appearance of Pentax Limited pancakes.

[@HeikoBertram]

Anything small and light is better (doesn’t have to be cheap) makes you forget about the camera and makes you take better photos

[@gwm88]

Truly curious about this lens. I currently have a 35mm 1.8 and absolutely love it. Was about to pull the trigger on the 50mm 1.8 but now I’m second guessing. The idea of a pancake in a pocket sounds nice as long as it’s sharp at 2 or 2.8 since I mostly shoot there anyway.

[@nomanCyclewala]

@@gwm88 i mean as long as you don’t need clinically sharp images you are good. i just love the micro contrast that makes the images look 3 dimensional. which 35mm you have btw ?

[@deanzat]

When I had two lenses, I sometimes had the wrong lens on the camera. Now that I have a dozen lenses, I ALWAYS have the wrong lens on the camera.

[@jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas]

You need to focus on photo projects. For example one day you do only animals, the next day you do only macro, the next day only portraits, ...but if you don't know what to photograph this can happen.

[@fwfeo]

Manage your expectations! 😂 If you think your lenses cover everything, but the right one is not mounted, then that’s the feeling. For events I take two bodies with one covering wide and one covering long. Two f/2.8 zooms! That covers 95% of everything.

[@lsh-zi2lc]

sarcasm missed.....

[@mqwhat]

😂

[@mqwhat]

So you need a dozen cameras too 😊

[@alstrofi7899]

Don't forget the incredible 105 macro lens!

[@AllisonRoadWest]

He definitely forgot 😢

[@astrokari9567]

Came here to say this. Might be more of a niche prime for some folks, but it’s an incredible portrait lens in a similar range as the 135mm Plena. If you are in fact a macro photographer, I think it’s the best lens for that on any system. It’s so sharp and beautiful - my Z5 is actually the thing holding back my photos with it!

[@Post-buttwave]

Seriously? It's so insanely good. It's big. But it's also light, and it does two things very very very well: macro and portrait. Definitely among the best on the system.

[@domm6812]

Yeah, disappointed they forgot the whole macro category.

[@McZanester]

I use mine for everything. Even if I shouldn't, I figure out how to fit that guy into a square hole.

[@ShazniAG]

7:48 Where can I get that $2 Plena

[@pedro77167]

Hahaha was just about to comment this

[@v3rlon]

The Plena is $2, but the shipping and handling is outrageous.

[@AbbeyRoadDuluth]

The Tamron Z 35-150 2/2.8 is a lens that I agree with Jordan on, and enthusiastically recommend. It is truly a Swiss Army knife of an optical tool...it does everything...and does it exquisitely. My primary working kit has been greatly reduced and now includes just the Nikkor Z 14-24 2.8 (the definition of a perfect wide angle lens), Tamron 35-150, the 26 2.8 (for walkaround/street), the Z 50 1.8 (no brainer) and the old F-mount Sigma 100-400 w/FTZ for occasional telephoto needs; its performance is really surprising on the Z8. But, 90% of the time, the 35-150 is what is locked on to my camera. It's really that great.

[@mcandelacom]

I am actually interested in the Tamron 35-150mm but my only issue is the weight. I would need to wait a few years for Tamron to release a lighter new version... Unlike Chris, I would be more interested in a prime 35mm than a 50mm. I heard the Sony version is quite amazing though

[@AbbeyRoadDuluth]

@@mcandelacom yes, the 35-150 is certainly a chunky piece of glass. However, I find that it pairs nicely with my equally chunky Z8. Overall, for me, the performance and versatility outweighs (literally) the size.

[@mcandelacom]

@@AbbeyRoadDuluth good to hear. Besides the wait, any downfalls in terms of performance? sharpness, bokeh, focus speed and accuracy? Thanks again

[@calebchristensenviolin]

My issue with the Tamron is sample variation…I keep hearing people who had multiple soft copies. Even the people with decent copies have said they’re not up to Nikkor quality.

[@SatanSupimpa]

I have a sony a6000 and can't afford an upgrade, and yet I keep watching all these review videos.

[@muhammadrayhanfirdaus1309]

You are not alone, my guy. Keep dreaming though, wish you well!

[@cameraprepper7938]

The Sony A6000 is still a very good Camera ! For Sony there are hundreds of options of Lenses to choose from.

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

Maybe consider the Viltrox 27mm and 75mm lenses, they work well with the Sony a6000.

[@Commonyou7149]

Still best for photography, only physical upgrades matter. I am using Nikon z6, it has bad subject tracking than your camera. But I like it for my family photography. 😊😊

[@erichramone7812]

Hear that 😅

[@HB-oi6tp]

You make a best Z-mount lenses list without including the Z105/2.8 macro?! It's an absolutely FANTASTIC lens. It's super sharp edge-to-edge already wide open, has incredible contrast and a beautiful bokeh. I'd even say it's probably the best macro lens ever made. It's also very versatile and excellent for several other types of photography.

[@eberry023]

Mine has focusing issues when using it for portraits. I have the 85mm 1.2 and the Plena as well so it really only gets used for macro.

[@phenomenalshots7626]

Maybe it's because Nikon is refreshing that 105mm macro.

[@JLTPhotog]

Agree, LOVE that lens. Its stunning.

[@solidstream13]

I agree. That might be my next lens

[@solidstream13]

@@eberry023macros are inherently slow focusing. They can be used for portraits but primarily designed for macro.

[@EXkurogane]

Nikon's 50mm lenses especially are just amazing for focus stacking of product & scale models in studio because they don't focus breathe, be it the 1.2S or 1.8S. You won't get too much ghosting that requires manual editing because each individual frame align very well in the stacking process. These lenses were exactly the reason why I bought into the Z mount. RF and E mount lenses don't exactly meet my requirements in this regard.

[@romanpul]

Though they forgot to mention the 50mm f2.8 MC

[@EXkurogane]

@@romanpul The 50MC is okay, but more suitable for APSC in my opinion, working distance is short if you are photographing something small. And I didnt like the extending barrel design. I do have the 105 MC and it is seriously good. I use it for videos more, or single shot product photos.

[@romanpul]

@@EXkurogane Yeah, I’m also not a huge fan of that lens. I just thought it might have been worth pointing out

[@stevetqp9152]

Excellent points, @EXkurogane! I too, use the NIkkor Z 50 f/1.8 S for focus stacking small products with the Z8, and obtain good results after stacking/merging 10-50 images. However, I find that the IRIX 150 f/2.8 Macro lens does an even better job in terms of image detail rendition, likely because it is optimized for close focusing. Of course, the IRIX is MF only, but the deep focus throw allows for ultra-precise focusing.

[@petertindall7374]

I just received the Viltrox 16mm f1.8 full frame z-mount lens and so far I am very happy with it, especially since it was under $500 USD on sale.

[@MrJason8957]

I chose the 14-24mm f/2.8 over the 14-30mm f/4 because I wanted to have it for astro as well. It is much lighter than you'd expect and a joy to shoot with. It is more limited in focal length which means changing lenses if I want to go above 24. Happy with that choice. I chose the 100-400mm over the 70-200mm f/2.8 as I get more range if slightly less optical quality. Still happy with my choice on that. I bought the 24-200mm before the 24-120mm was out. I'd have chosen the 24-120mm if that option had been available at the time. I also have a 35mm f/1.8 prime and I love it.

[@jasontaylor1920]

We are so spoiled. ALL the Z lenses are good. The 24-200 matches some of the F mount primes at some focal lengths.

[@Aphorism89]

Exactly, it is only weak at 24mm. In all the other FL it is nearly impossible to impossible to tell the difference with the 120S. It is a bit annoying how some people are supporting the ultra meta picking of lenses... Like if making good photography was about having the most sharp lens ever!

[@salami99]

@@Aphorism89 good photography is about have affordable lens. nikon has done a great job top to bottom. as a canon guy, i hate the canon pricing. z mount proprietary is great compared to canon.

[@Jviotr]

A couple years ago I bought the Z5 on sale for $999 and paired it with the 24-120, which was also on sale for $899 at the time. I use that combo for 90% of my shots and no complaints. Also if you’re willing to go Viltrox, they currently have the widest ultra wide prime on Z mount with the 16mm f/1.8.

[@calebchristensenviolin]

Don’t know whether it was out three months ago when you posted this, but there’s now a 10mm 2.8 from Laowa for Nikon.

[@JamesDarcey]

I really have to say, the 50mm 1.8 S is OUTSTANDING. It produces such characterful and sharp images I honestly love shooting it all the time. I would highly recomend anyone that is getting into the Z mount to pick up one.

[@tor2919]

Legendary lens

[@ctietsort]

Agreed. Punches way above its price tag!

[@unn4medfeel1ng]

Jordan's kit: $11025 Chris' kit: $14125 P.S. that Plena is really affordable, didn't expect that quality for just $2

[@mizuhokusuha]

It's all relative, their kind of salary they are probably pulling, even Leica lenses are probably bargain bin price for them.

[@Yilmaz4]

@@aaronmoore3050 you didn't get the joke

[@gregfd]

As an amateur and someone who doesn't like zooms. I highly recommend the 28mm 2.8 and 40mm 2.8 for casual/family/street/travel photography. Although these types of lenses aren't really exclusive to Nikon, I think they were designed for people like me. They're part of the reason I currently use a Nikon camera.

[@JuanRojas956]

As a wedding photographer on the z8 I have my 24-70 2.8 and on my z6 I have the 85mm 1.8 it covers everyhting I need and great quality

[@fwfeo]

I’d still recommend the Tamron 35-150/2-2.8!! Then you can be good with a 20/1.8 and 35-150! 20mm to 150mm covered!! More coverage than 24-85🤷‍♂️

[@myfakeguuglaccount8307]

Can you share some thoughts on why you put those lenses on those cameras (versus the opposite)? I have a Z8 and Z6ii, and 24-70/2.8 and 85/1.2, and haven't settled on which lens I want on which camera.

[@manugeee]

My only Z-Mount lens is the 40mm f/2 SE on the Nikon ZF. Fortunately there is the megadap etz Adapter, so I also have my nice Sony glass, I can still use on the Nikon. 😊

[@fwfeo]

The only drawback is if the adapted lens has noticeable distortion and other optical shortcomings, because LR and the camera won’t correct it!

[@fwfeo]

I use 35-150 Tamron E mount on Nikon Z and it works flawlessly! ❤️

[@above-photo-video3149]

I'm with you 100%. The 24-120 is fantastic for everything including macro photography. I take photos at a step back distance with the 120mm and with the Z7 sensor cropped in. Everything is in focus without focus stacking and it looks like macro photography, because I was farther away. An incredible lens and still a fantastic sensor. I use the 14-30 all the time as well.

[@NetvoTV]

How about 28-400mm?

[@jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas]

Why not mentioning the 70-180 mm f/2.8 which is lighter, more compact and less expensive?

[@sirwillemgaming9686]

Now I know why I don't see the Plena in every camera shop where I live. It's so affordable that it is always out of stock.

[@astrokari9567]

😂

[@pashedu_if]

my line: 24-120 f4 my default walk around lens, 70-200 f2.8 for events (marathon, dance, etc.), 85 f1.8 for static portraits, laowa 100mm f2.8 for macro.

[@kostasge]

Litterly posted a poll debating which lens would be better on a z8 24-120 f4 or 35-150 f2-2.8 and I see this video pop up this morning. I was so excited to see what you guys picked , and basically you guys picked both. Thanks lol

[@fwfeo]

Hahahaha You can’t go wrong with either! I have 35-150/2-2.8 and is my favorite lens ever! And I’ve had plenty of Canon L, Nikon pro and Sony lenses! It’s a beast of a lens and pretty heavy, so I would get 24-120/4 for walk around and 35-150 for portraits and low light events …

[@kostasge]

@@fwfeo went Tamron

[@4rroby]

As a Nikon Z mount user, I have to say this is the most informative and useful recommendation Ive seen and heard! You are spot on! As for me, I want the 70-200, and the 135 Plena! Thanks for the excellent information! I really appreciate you guys!❤

[@Joelsfilmer]

The Viltrox 16/1.8 should probably be mentioned in the ultrawide category. It's pretty decent.

[@artsilva]

This is a "Best" lens presentation, not a "pretty decent" category in which many lenses will qualify.

[@Joelsfilmer]

@@artsilva Considering the fact that Nikon doesn't offer anything wider than 20 themselves, I think an above average 16 mm deserves a mention.

[@artsilva]

@@Joelsfilmer Considering you are quite uninformed that there is the 14-30 f4, 14-24 f2.8 which are top tier optics especially the f2.8 where a normal 16mm will still come in at f3.5, f2.8 or f2 at best anyways. PLUS you forget that there are TONS of choices for excellent wides zooms AND primes Nikon made in the last five decades including 10 and 8 mm fisheyes in the nikkor F mount that work seamlessly and inexpensively with the FTZ that came with the Z cameras.

[@Joelsfilmer]

@@artsilva There are no native Z-mount Nikon primes wider than 20mm and brighter than 2.8. I'll leave it at that.

[@HR-wd6cw]

I think they were probably trying to stick with "official" Z lenses (like ones that are either made by Nikon, or authorized to be made by Nikon, hence the Tamron). There are also a lot of third party options out there so probably too many to list so they narrowed the scope to authorized lenses.

[@InterMaus]

I have the 105mm f/1.4, with the FTZ it works wonders on the Z6II for portraits.

[@Hyephen]

For wildlife primes I've found I really like the 400 f4.5 + 1.4 tc. It gets you to 560mm f6.3 which is very close to the Nikkor 600 f6.3 at about a $700 discount with the additional benefit of enjoying 2 different focal lengths.

[@gavmiller]

Worth noting that the Nikkor 14-24 2.8 112mm filter hood can be fitted to the 24-70 and 70-200 2.8 lenses as well, so you can use the same filters if you invest in 112mm filters. Alternative is to use rear filters in it. Bit more fiddly.

[@AnonGoogleuser]

Or the NiSi filter adapter for filter plates.

[@OkwyUgonweze]

As a portrait shooter I have some lenses some lenses in this list and I can tell you they are all fantastic lenses. The 50,85 1.2 primes and the 24-70 2.8s and 70-200 2.8 S zooms. Nikon has done great job here.Butbwhat I found fascinating is that I prefer the tamron 35-150 and viltrox 16mm to my 24-70 and 70-200 combo. Right now I shoot events with the tamron.

[@alarak2159]

Cracking vid - you displayed the 400mm 4.5 VR S for the picture of the 600mm tho! Cheers guys

[@Gr1ff1D0]

I bought the Z6ii to see what mirrorless would be like. It came with anF4 24-70. I was not expecting the lens to be as great as it is. The Z mount range is a great reason for me to stick with Nikon. I have also changed my mind on something I never expected to and bought a variable aperture zoom for birding. The 180-600 is great value for money.

[@stjepanjina]

i used Z5 and 24-200, and now i waiting 180-600! Loved!

[@rafmos]

02:05 Just FYI, the text left of the 14-24mm lens is wrong. It's written 12-24mm.

[@shang-hsienyang1284]

In my opinion, the best lenses are the 24-120mm f/4, 24-200mm f/4-6.3, and 28-400mm f/4-8. I am tired of bokeh, corner sharpness, or pristine noiseless images. I'd rather have the lens to capture the decisive moment and not caught off guard changing lenses. I only use prime lenses on the second body.

[@Old_Man_Bridge]

I hear you and I like it.

[@corykphotography]

Jordans pick for the tamron 35-150 is the one lens I feel like I need.

[@bucketsofglory]

I use it 90%+ with a z8. It does everything well.

[@corykphotography]

@@bucketsofglory I've definitely been leaning at it. Probably going to sell my Olympus E-M1X and a couple lenses to get it. These days I've been leaning towards going full Nikon.

[@ayanat.miller3929]

Waiting patiently for a sale or price drop!

[@jacobh5817]

Though Nikon was a bit slow ‘out of the gate’ with mirrorless, they’ve not only catched up with the rest, but are now class leading in almost all categories. As a semi-retired fashion/beauty photographer, I’ve left the days of bags of cameras and lenses behind me and I’m happily enjoying the pleasure of compact Q and M cameras. But if I would ever need to go shopping for a DSLM system again, it would be Z-mount.

[@mylucksmiles]

Question . Given Lightroom has introduced blur into its arsenal . Is it possible to recreate the 1.2 f look without paying the price? I purchased the z50 1.2 f . It’s not just blur pretty is give a rendition of excellent quality ,it brings clarity to an image. I have the Samyang 135 latest version. The colour capture on my z 8 brings a completely unique and pleasing image. That said the adapter for the Sony to z mount has been a problem . Soft wear updates are a risky. So the alternative to the z135 when considering the price between the two lenses I would not recommend buying the Samyang because of the converter problem I faced . I have the z 85 f 1.8 and it’s good sharper at certain f stops than the 1.2f . Really depends on the look you want . Please note so many people coming into photography concentrate on their equipment. The image quality is of course a factor .The mistake they make is that the pro equipment is what makes their photos great. The truth is far from that. You can take a horse to water but you can’t make it drink. I enjoy your channel . Thanks hope my little explanation is worth the read . I have purchased 3 adapters so buyer be ware . The cost of the three adapters brings it into reach of the Nikon 135 z

[@jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas]

Nikon Z-Mount is the only mount on the market where you can adapt nearly every lens on the market. From Sony E-Mount lenses to Canon EF-Mount lenses, old F-Mount lenses, Leica, Pentax, FUJI there is an adapter for it. I believe even Canon RF-Mount would be possible.

[@severgun]

Adapting is not an option at all.

[@malinut]

I have a 100 year old Leitz-Elmar 35mm f3.5 on mine, lovely match.

[@livejames9374]

@@severgunif the experience is like having a native lens then why wouldn’t it be an option?

[@LukaszFrankowski]

Everything but RF mount unfortunately

[@jonasgillmann]

@@LukaszFrankowskithere aren’t any adapters for RF to Nikon Z yet but it should technically be possible as the Nikon Z mounts flange distance is shorter. So why wouldn’t an RF adapter be possible as well?

[@Weyco23]

My favorites for long primes on my Z9 are still the F mount 300 2.8 VRII, and 500 f/4E.

[@davedrake359]

Hi Chris, I love your videos and have followed you and Jordan for a few years. Thank you for all the reviews you do. I recently sold my D5500 and D7200 with all the f mount lenses to upgrade to the Z50 and Z6ii bodies. Z50 for travel is awesome. I chose the Tamron Nikon branded Z trio for the Z6ii because of the f2.8 affordable pricing and added a 1.4xTC for the 70-180 f2.8. I then added the 24-120 f4S lens after seeing the reviews and I agree with you, it’s the best walk around lens due to the extra reach and image quality. But then I saw the Z180-600 and that is a must for any armature for wildlife and will also works great with the 1.4xTC. With this setup I can pack the trio plus TC in my compact camera backpack with the 24-120 mounted on the body and bring along the 180-600 in the Ape Case I purchased for it. Only 2 bags with a tripod and I’m covered. Thanks again and keep those videos coming. Dave Drake Coldstream BC

[@MiladJP]

Mine is the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 - The autofocus is incredibly fast, the lens is small and lightweight, as well as perfect for my needs. ( Photojournalism )

[@fallogingl]

Can you review ETZ21 pro?

[@jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas]

The 14-24 mm f/2.8 Z-Mount takes also filters at the rear of the lens which are a lot smaller and less expensive. Don't know why it didn't get mentioned.

[@louisevessey]

I agree with this list! Somehow I lost my Z 50mm 1.8 so I just ordered the Z 50mm 1.4. Not an S lens but I absolutely LOVE it! Nice close focus distance, super light and bright. Probably my current fave to have close by for when my cats do something cute!!

[@fscg2732]

Enjoyed, but why not mention the micro lenes?

[@izziereal2010]

I love the 50mm f1.8 Z lens. It's a phenomenal lens and the extra cost for it is well worth it. The 85mm f1.8 does a great job as a portrait lens, image quality is outstanding. I love the Tamron 35-150mm f2-2.8 as an all around lens for both photos or video with the large aperture. The other great lens that is light and very versatile is the 24-120mm f4. Great job Nikon on these lenses.

[@pete1927]

Had a bit of luck the other week, picked up a brand new 14-24mm f2.8 for less than £1000. There must of been a glitch in the matrix 😅. I popped in the cart and paid and thought the vendors would spot it especially when they had no stock. No! Unbelievably it arrived 4 days later… one happy bunny here.

[@RecordProduction]

I had a similar 24-70 f/2.8S experience, bit more money but still an epic deal. My 14-24 is one of my most used, hope you enjoy yours 🙂

[@Skidoo22]

I'd say don't forget the 17-28 2.8, it covers astro and you can use the 28mm end for great video work. Don't forget Hollywood for the most part uses 28mm.

[@Framesbyfrisby]

That 24-120 just lives on my z8 especially because the z8 is really good at lowlight by itself.

[@funkyboogiee]

jumping from Fuji, for only some job requirements for real estate. I went to KEH today and checked out the Z6 iii and the 14-30 f/4. That is a good set up (overkill for real estate on the body end of thigs) BUT the z6 ii does not have a darn articulating screen and when I'm in the corner of a room shooting, you gotta have the articulating screen. At least I got use to it on my XT-4 for the last several years. I'm tempted to get the Z6 ii and see if I can deal with the flip screen but I'm not sure that i can. I held a cannon for the first time today and didn't know their RF wide zooms seem larger than the nikon. and RF glass is more money in general? I have more body options jumping to cannon FF but I am leaning towards the Nikon Z series for more long term ability to afford other lenses beyond just the wide zoom for real estate.

[@RR-bm6od]

What would be a good travel lens to go with my Nikon Z8 I have just brought. I am going to Germany and was looking at the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S but concerned with low light. On a budget

[@momchilyordanov8190]

The best lens for Z mount is the 24-120mm. Second place is the 50/1.8 S. A gem of a lens imo. Third place - 14-30mm. And for portraits, if 85/1.8 S is not enough (for me it is, another great lens), I would rather go for the F-mount 105/1.4, than the new 135/1.8, because of price and 135 being too tight.

[@R9247W]

Always torn between the 14-24 2.8 and the 20 1.8 for astrophotography.. Haven't purchased one yet.. Any recommendations?

[@TheAlskouba]

No 35mm? I know Chris hates them but it's still a popular focal length. It would be nice to know what you think of the new Z35mm 1.4 and how it fit's in the Z mount current lineup.

[@idolempert7814]

Thanks for this great video. What are your toughts about the 100-400 lens ?

[@photographlisbon]

Any chance of a comparative video with Nikon Z6iii, Zf and it's Sony and Canon equivalents?

[@jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas]

What about the new 35 mm f/1.4?

[@Jimbojam]

I have the 400mm f/4.5 and love it, especially with the 1.4x and 2x teleconverters when I need it.

[@Synmomusic]

Great choices! Heads up, you have a few mislabeled title cards in this one. I spotted a 12-24 typo, and of course the 2 dollar Plena.

[@JasonLorette]

My favourite current Z lens is my 24-120 f4, this is hardly off my Z6III (and my Z6II)...I've been eyeing that 20mm 1.8. I agree...I really wish there were Sigma ART Z lenses.

[@TL-vt8uk]

Interesting video.....no 100-400mm? One of my favorites!

[@johnlinney8685]

I use the 24-70 f4 and 24-200 on my z7ii plus the 50mm f1.8. On my z6ii I have the 40mm f2 se and 28mm f2.8 se plus the TT artisans 75mm f2 for occasional reach. The street primes are excellent and give a certain look you don’t get from many modern lenses.

[@rmcguirephoto]

I have several higher quality S lenses, but the lens I use the most now is the non-S 24-200. Incredibly versatile for a walk-around lens and I rarely need to swap lenses, except sometimes to a wider one. It doesnt have a wide aperture, but these days you can use a higher ISO and a bit of noise reduction in low-light situations. My next lens will be the 105mm macro and portrait lens. Additionally, some of my old F lenses work great with the FTZ adapter.

[@moderntimes4814]

Can you suggest the best 8mm fisheye 180 degree fov lens? ( Full frame or dx)

[@maze400]

So if I buy a new Z8 Nikon will throw in a plana for an additional $2?

[@miklasmichal]

Do you think that I can get similar result if I use 85/1.2 on Z9 in dx mode as if I would use plena (except lower resolution)?

[@lowellprice]

I shoot with the Z14-24mm f/2.8 S, Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S, Z 70-200mm F/2.8 S, and Z100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 S. If I need to go beyond 400mm, I use the Z TC1.4, which I cannot see any loss in sharpeness at 560mm. I use the lenses on both a Z7II and Z8, which are excellent camera bodies.

[@NicolasAlexanderOtto]

I still hope to get a 15-35 lens that takes filters. With the 24 I do not have enough range and it does not take polarizing filters with usual 100mm systems and the 14-30 is only f/4. Somehow it is always a compromise. The UWA lenses by Canon are the only thing I miss these days shooting Nikon again. But therefore I get the 180-600 and the 24-120 as well, awesome lenses.

[@MaxWilhelm-l9f]

I encourage everybody to look into the 24-200 f4-6.3 lens. I've been using it for a couple weeks and it rarely leaves the camera body. Affordable too

[@duncanwallace7760]

Just spent 3 months in Africa doing wildlife photography and the 100-400 was pretty much permanently on my camera. It's a great lens especially with the high megapixel sensors which you can crop a fair bit and still have a usable image.

[@deanjelcic9299]

I would take a Z8 with 24-120 f/4 if I would have to pick only one body and lens. I mean the Z8 is just sooo sweet and 24-120 is really great and able to do good close up also. But in general, Nikon did a great job 💪

[@veener79]

When I came over to the Nikon side this year I got the 24-120mm and 180-600mm to start off as I mostly shoot outdoor. The 24-1200mm I can tell is going to be my fav so far. Now I want something that can bring in more light. I am very much thinking the 14-24mm 2.8f will be my next lens.

[@alsimoncelli7313]

Of my 11 Z lenses, the 24-120mm is my favorite, so impressed with its IQ. I typically leave the 24-70mm 2.8 & 70-200mm 2.8 at home. Leaving for an Alaskan trip and will take the 14-30mm, 24-120mm and 180-600mm with my 1.4 tele. And one of my primes, either the 20mm, 35mm or 50mm 1.8. Not sure?

[@stevetqp9152]

Great commentary on the superb Nikon Z System lenses, Chris! I agree with the majority of your assessments, except that I find the 14-30 f/4 to be better for my landscape work, being IMHO, 99% as sharp as the 14-24 f/2.8. Plus, when retracted with hood reversed, it fits "lens down" in my Shimoda 30L Explore backpack mounted on a Z7, something the 14-24 wound not do..

[@ruff1draft]

I am currently enjoying using the Nikon 85mm F1.8 F Mount for my street photography. I have been using it more than i thought I would for street photography.

[@Xirpzy]

I really want those mid range 1.4 and 1.8 lenses on canon. Sony and nikons lens lineup just makes way more sense.

[@GaryInSoCal]

I'm disappointed that you didn't mention the really sweet 85 F1.8... sharp... very low priced... nice subject isolation wide open.

[@ruff1draft]

I am pleased Nikon introduced both the Nikon Z 24-120 F4 lens and the Nikon Z 28-400 lens to the Nikon Z line up. They would be great for versatile zoom length travel photography

[@michaelst.9055]

I (very) recently completed my (flight) travel combo with the 14-30mm/f4 and the 28-400mm/f4-8. I liked the 24-70mm/f4 but compared to the 24-120mm/f4 it's missing some range for an 'always on' lense. So I switched to this for hiking and similar situations. I'm missing a few of the 3rd party goodies like the Viltrox 16mm/f1.8. It was said that APS/C is out of scope but the 13mm/f1.4 was one of my choices for the Z50 too.

[@corykphotography]

I shoot Viltrox primes on my Z5. It has been 👌

[@jos3zavalar3cillas]

I’m a Nikon user on apsc but I feel like on close box, Nikon don’t have versatile lens on apsc . What you think about? Saludos🇲🇽

[@dyeremi]

Third party lenses from Voigtlander, Thypoch, Viltrox and TT Artisans are awesome as well.

[@cameraprepper7938]

If I had Nikon Z mount and wanted the best Lenses, then I would go for Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 35mm 2.0, Voigtländer Nokton 50mm 1.0, Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 65mm 2.0, Voigtländer Nokton 75mm 1.5, Nikon Z 400mm 4.5 and Nikon Z 800mm 6.3 (or Nikon 600mm 6.3).

[@BGTuyau]

I own some of the items mentioned and find the brief, snappy reviews credible and helpful, even if likely paid-for. What puzzles me is the often loose relationships among lens physical sizes, focal lengths, maximum apertures -and in some instances, prices. But that's an entirely different video. Thanks for producing and posting.

[@rvpcqp]

9:27 love how the 400mm f4.5 pulls double duty as a 600mm f6.3 depending on its mood

[@GG-zv9ku]

I'm pleasingly surprised by the pancake NIKKOR Z 26mm f/2.8. Such a great walk around lens!

[@corrbox2]

Thanks for the information Chris. Very good to hear your opinions 👍 📷 😎

[@technodronesogxl9783]

The Nikoon 70-200mm F2.8 VR S is 2295.00 at B&H, which is a steal.

[@3xtraspicy]

For traveling, would you go 50mm or 35?

[@audamus6452]

My wallet doesn't like your choices.

[@shreyjani668]

Lmao

[@lolfirepoisonftl]

Argh this is so tough. I want to get into taking event photos but I still don't know what lens to go to. The 24-120 F4 seems like the most versatile option but the newer Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 is also intriguing. Both are around the same price too. Or maybe I get a used 24-70mm F/4 for cheap and use the extra money towards a 2nd lens? What would you guys do?

[@seanmolincreative]

I shoot a LOT of event work, and I tend to just run two bodies with a normal wide on one and a normal telephoto on the other. I end up using the wide the vast majority of the time. And I find that you often don't have control over your lighting (aside from flash depending on the event) so it pays to have that extra aperture to use. I almost always reach for primes and tend to find a fast 24 to 35 is king. From what you mentioned, the 28-75 f/2.8 is hands-down THE lens I'd get for events if you only had one lens and didn't want to force yourself to a prime. The nice thing about events is that you virtually always have a lot of ability to zoom with your feet, so don't be too scared with a prime. You want wide because you're often in close quarters, but if you are too wide, just get closer. If you are too close, step back a bit. Bottom line: I wouldn't use anything slower than f/2.8 if I'm doing event work. Prioritize the wide side of things. But ultimately if you take it seriously you're going to want options no matter what. I know plenty of people who do this for a living using the 24-70 and 70-200 f/2.8 and never ever ever want for anything else.

[@lolfirepoisonftl]

@@seanmolincreative Sorry for the late reply Sean, this is really helpful and I appreciate reading your experience on how you shoot events. I definitely think the f/4 lenses are now off the table for me and I'll start thinking about my different lens option around primes and f/2.8 zooms. Thanks again Sean!

[@mick1967]

You are right with every lens you mention but to me it‘s a typical choice from KZbinrs like you who have unlimited access to all these expensive lenses without buying them. There are lots of people out there who can afford the 24-70 f/4 (which you mentioned) and one prime lens. And my recommendation is always the 40mm f/2 and the 28m f/2.8. Both are not the sharpest lenses in the world but they have a certain look, they are light weight and don’t cost a fortune. I use them often on my Z8. It‘s a great combo for street photography.

[@phenomenalshots7626]

I picked up a 24-120mm f/4 and my oh my it's beautiful. I always have it on my camera and walk with my 85mm f/1.8 f-mount and ftz adoptor. I will eventually get both the 85mm f/1.2 and the 135mm f/1.8.

[@ruff1draft]

To be honest when it comes to Nikon as a whole i am looking for the Nikon 105 F1.4 or Nikon 105 F1.8 F Mount. I currently own the Nikon 50mm F1.4 and Nikon 85 F1.8 for my Nikon D5500 I intend to purchase the Nikon D5600 and Nikon D750 and Nikon D780. But i must admit i am looking forward to seeing what Nikon does with the future Nikon Z5 Mark 2

[@mylucksmiles]

I use the z8 along with the z14-30 the z24-120 the z70-200 and z180-600. My primes are the z40 the z85 the z 105 and get this the Samyang 135 with the Sony 10:59 convertor ( that’s the latest version) I also have a sigma 35 DG art, I use for film more than photography. I also use the Z7.2 ……. All those Nikon lenses produced wonderful images . The 180-600 z can be super sharp but at closer distances than used on the father away stuff . Footnotes ….. the lenses can be enhanced in light-room. Bokeh wish with its new blur function. However my favourite photos come from the 135 . So would I be better moving on the Samyang Sony mount and getting the z version. I do like the Samyang but I use a coveter for Sony to Nikon this has taken three attempts to purchase a song to Nikon body adapter (bummer . ) The Samyang I think is great but it’s the up grade s on the adapter I blow my first adapter trying to up load firm wear . It that too was a nightmare event! The real worry is in the field when I change lenses . The question is how sharp is the more expensive 135 z ? The film is ok on the sigma and the 35 mm is covered on the 24-120 mm which is my favourite and most often used in scouting trips. All this said I learned my craft at a local wild life lodge it’s only a mile walk around . Two things it was great for one if I took a photo and later thought I should have tried a 10:59 different approach I was able to go back and retake it. I learned the important bits about the use of my gear and when I forgot something I could nip home and get . I learned to check my bag and camera to make sure I hag not forgotten anything and had a checklist. The best part of learning is in the doing . Yes I have great stuff but I can go anywhere now I have learned to use it. Spend your money on lenses they out live the camera body . My z 7 2 does not get much use its now my back up . My lenses now they are all competent and make me think which one I want to use . Love your stuff you have been very helpful and honest I respect that cheers my points lenses out live bodies and if you can’t get great photo locally then don’t pay to travel . You won’t get them that way either .

[@sibythomas7262]

What about the 70-180mm 2.8?

[@questioneverything680]

How would y’all rank each manufacturers lens lineup as a whole and what do you think they still need to work on? Is there any manufacturer you would highly recommend over another because of their lenses (i.e maybe higher consideration for Nikon as a wildlife suite because of the compact telephoto primes). Would be interested in hearing y’all’s takes for both personal use and a more generalized approach.

[@PetaPixel]

Stay tuned, that’s an upcoming podcast topic!

[@Legends_OfTheLand]

What’s your thoughts on a Tamron 18mm-400mm F/3.5-6.3 paired with a Nikon Z6?

[@JennyDarukat]

The 24-120 f4 has been my favourite lens I've used/owned across 8 years and 3 systems, aside from the Voigtländer 40mm f1.2 which is a very different type of lens. It's just that great. I really wish Nikon had more low profile, pancake-adjacent lenses since that's what had me leaving the system again. Fuji and MFT just offer more choice in terms of size and form factor.