Watch the extended highlights of Pete Sampras vs. Jim Courier in the semifinals of the 1995 US Open. Click here to subscribe: / usta Instagram: / usta TikTok: / usta X: / usta Facebook: / usta Website: www.usta.com
Пікірлер: 109
@tomastoth38393 ай бұрын
Laid-back match. No grunting, no drama, no spectacular play, pure tennis.
@恒男高山3 ай бұрын
no dram?
@恒男高山3 ай бұрын
no drama😅
@b.b.40103 ай бұрын
In other words, boring
@rafaelodossantos42103 ай бұрын
@@b.b.4010you are not serious you cannot be serious judge
@vvaltierra55563 ай бұрын
Many Spectacular rallies, great match!
@el60233 ай бұрын
Thank you @USTA! There is difficult to find Videos of such quality. Sampras, what a great athlete! 😊
@Laura-i2r9r3 ай бұрын
Totally loved Pete Sampras ❤❤ Jim Courier was a Great Tennis player also . 😊😊🎉🎉
@radiohead2206Ай бұрын
Honestly I could not stand Jim playing. I was so wrong. He seems like a great person now that I hear him commenting.
@kofipokuantwi-boateng54463 ай бұрын
It's a pity we can't see the score lines. Great highlights
@meilstone3 ай бұрын
At first I thought the same, but somehow it gets more exciting without the score and commentary.
@VinayakPande533 ай бұрын
Courier in the semis, then Agassi in the final. Just to let everyone know who the top dog in American and world tennis was by the end of 1995.
@iggypopisgod93 ай бұрын
Courier in the semis, then Agassi in the final. Just to let everyone know who the top dog in American and word tennis was by the end of 1995. Been downhill ever since
@WONGLER3 ай бұрын
80s + 90s = The GOLDEN Times of tennis , miss it so much
@gingerpinoadventures3 ай бұрын
I agree.
@davidr28023 ай бұрын
@@gingerpinoadventures I would argue the 70s and 80s were the golden age.
@Gitfiddle3 ай бұрын
Jim Courier one the almost forgotten great 90’s players. That monster inside out forehand. His backhand looked like he was swinging a baseball bat. And a deceptively good serve.
@lwh73012 ай бұрын
Not nearly enough against a well rounded player like Sampras.
@ah47603 ай бұрын
Notice these men never look up at their team after every single shot for reassurance like today’s boy-men?
@tomastoth38393 ай бұрын
@@ah4760 spot-on my friend. No need to babysit these old skool tennis players.
@danielhkhk72833 ай бұрын
No fist after every shot.
@markoragnos67573 ай бұрын
Cannot stand thst term team. It's a joke.
@AtlanticDNA2 ай бұрын
This thread is full my kind of people. The term team is pathetic. The fist pumping after every point is cringe. Look at the coaches after every point is embarrassing
@radiohead2206Ай бұрын
There was no coaching allowed during the match. Not even in gestures.
@halleck32 ай бұрын
Damn, I miss the parity of the 90s. So many great players.
@vishalkharat45753 ай бұрын
Sampras and his deadly serve
@acemacgruber65933 ай бұрын
Pre-grunt era men’s tennis.
@jamesswain24653 ай бұрын
Rafa started the grunt
@uncletony62103 ай бұрын
@@jamesswain2465 Jimmy Connors
@jamesswain24653 ай бұрын
Yeah, him too
@acemacgruber65933 ай бұрын
@@uncletony6210 True, especially later in his career. In the 70’s he was mostly silent.
@jamesswain24653 ай бұрын
Thomas Muster, now he was a grunter.
@angelatanurdzic75083 ай бұрын
Great match. Thanks for uploading. 🤩
@watchalay743 ай бұрын
Sampras is most definitely at the level of the big 3. Have the big 3 play in Sampras's Era when strings couldn't generate so much topspin, racquets were heavier and had less control, and courts played faster and he would beat them. Agassi is the prototype for Djokovic and he beat him most of the time.
@delriver773 ай бұрын
Not Federer though. He played with the exact same racket and strings than Pete did. That rivalry would've been interesting.
@JH-gf4cm3 ай бұрын
These are all good points but I still think Sampras is a notch below. He couldn't play on clay and he lacked longevity. I know the latter was health related but the big 3's prevailing excellence well into their 30s is impressive.
@milanceric51473 ай бұрын
No, he did not. The Pro Staff model has been improved several times (interesting once to improve Federer’s BH)…and about string the difference is even higher. Sampras is at the same level of big 3. In my opinion, at 90s Federer and Djokovic would be less affected than Nadal, because are more precision and gifted players…and Murray would be like Kafelnikov or Rios.
@delriver773 ай бұрын
@@milanceric5147 in their 2001 match both had the exact same racket/strings, and Federer played with it for a few more years. And I don't think Djokovic is more gifted than Nadal, both were extremely physical, Novak was just less injury prone.
@jeevanpb34793 ай бұрын
The problem with nadal is if it cant serve well because there is huge chance for more rallies in 90s which ultimately leads to more baseline rallies which factor against nadal since topspin wont generate that much and will be problamatic for rafa.thats my thought @@delriver77
@gregorymathews58663 ай бұрын
Courier defeated Sampras, Connors, McEnroe, and Agassi at the U.S. Open in 1991-1992. Pretty good.
@davidr28023 ай бұрын
While he defeated two guys at the very end of their careers and two rising stars he still never won the Open. The US Open that is
@jobuck8793 ай бұрын
I remember watching this match and my dad asked “why is that person sitting on that chair on the court??” Even though I had played tennis and had been an avid fan since the late 70’s I was shocked he asked. So I just told him during a commercial break “that person puts their finger on the net to see if the server hits the ball on the net…” but afterwards I had to give him a more detailed explanation. Looking at this match now I’m like wow so much has changed. There’s no way anyone would want that job…not with the power of the players. You’re sure to get a concussion from being hit.
@AinSoph733 ай бұрын
No one wanted the job then either. You've heard about Edberg's fatal errant serve as a junior?
@BurnsTennis3 ай бұрын
At that stage in the 1990s, many tournaments in Europe were already using electronic net sensors to call Let. Interesting still used in the US Open in 1995. Love the Net Judge's reaction here at 14:15 Like, "Courier, what are you doing?! Dangerous.
@lassel16443 ай бұрын
Pretty hard hitting tennis not like todays but not so far away from it
@rafaelodossantos42103 ай бұрын
They never display score???
@gouveia3053 ай бұрын
Very cool! I had the impression the match was slower than nowadays. Seems like the ball has more speed nowadays. Still very good to watch!
@MinChiuKySangАй бұрын
merci❤
@franciscocadenas79393 ай бұрын
What a great match this was...
@edisonsubandi72313 ай бұрын
Good match…. Both are legend of tennis.
@DreamWatcher-h1j3 ай бұрын
Legends
@Onanastic3 ай бұрын
Remember when male American tennis players were good?
@jamesswain24653 ай бұрын
I just think that the Euros and the South Americans have caught up with and passed the Americans.
@jamesswain24653 ай бұрын
Good bye McEnroe and finesse tennis, hello power tennis.
@michelez7153 ай бұрын
Goodbye McEnroe's bad behaviour, hello respect and sportsmanship.
@boke753 ай бұрын
Sampras had a beautiful, flowing game. Courier's game was a lot more herky-jerky and a little hard on the eyes, sorry Jim.
@turdferguson23 ай бұрын
Courier has the ugliest backhand of all time
@danielhkhk72833 ай бұрын
@@turdferguson2No, love it.
@TB-zt6hs3 ай бұрын
Courier seemed to have a rather late set up for his FH
@davemathew3 ай бұрын
Yeah I remember he had a wicked forehand but forgot how unorthodox it was.
@sharifs6493 ай бұрын
@@davemathewseems almost sinneresque feel like courier would be very good in today's game back hand would need to be fixed
@albertdupont43512 ай бұрын
The 1st big four all american with agassi and chang ! Great Tennis !
@maverick-mma3 ай бұрын
Two power players...whenever they were paired it looked like they wanted to show who hit with the most power!
@andyroo93813 ай бұрын
I was a fan of Jim Courier's from day ONE.
@AbouTaim-Lille3 ай бұрын
It would have been better is there was a screen at the corner showing the score.
@vectorthurm3 ай бұрын
JC legit, totally changed the FH!!
@jonm2522Ай бұрын
when tennis was fun to watch , no bs grunting, pure class and short rallies. I really wonder how sampras or agassi, courier would have handled the modern day after 2010, against Nadal, federer, Novak.
@ramonh.arradazajr.99443 ай бұрын
Jim Courier tried so hard to avoid Pete's forehand. But in the end Sampra's serve was too much for him
@figueiredowff20 күн бұрын
Where is the score? 😢 Nice game! 👏👏👏👏
@oberdotАй бұрын
The guy calling lets. Cushiest job while it was in existence
@regularjoegamer21 күн бұрын
Sampras BH was fire
@mikimallek3572Ай бұрын
❤
@bennyr8392 ай бұрын
No score is shown? How are we supposed to know who was leading?
@michelez7153 ай бұрын
Ridiculous that USTA can't show the score. How are we supposed to know when there are break points?
@uncletony62103 ай бұрын
JC was talking shlt to Sampras' box during the match. Then after they shook hands he started explaining himself to Pete.
@ArvindKaushik-fm1cr3 ай бұрын
not a single winning serve and volley point in these highlights. it makes pete look like a baseliner who avoids coming to net. its like the USTA is afraid that showing good serve and volley points where the serve and volleyer wins the point will encourage players to take up serve and volleying, and they don't want that.
@bimbisarsingh34093 ай бұрын
It’s not like that. Pete Sampras knows Jim Courier made serve & volley players esp like Becker & Edberg life difficult with his powerful ground strokes & his own experience in 1993 Wimbledon final that was fought till 4 sets bt Pete won 2 sets on tie breaker that Courier himself admitted “losing in tiebreaker is pretty discouraging”. In that two sets Pete attempted several volleys Bt passed on by Courier from baseline shots. Well still Sampras ambushed in winning volleys points against baseliners like Courier & Agassi when opportunity presents & rather somewhat with surprise attack
@turdferguson23 ай бұрын
That is a crazy af theory lol what
@redrum212253 ай бұрын
I remember these days. Courier was great and was the 2nd member of the new generation after Agassi to win a slam. His lack of a big serve was his biggest weakness. He would've had at least 3 more slams if he had a bigger serve.
@suatkayatennis3 ай бұрын
Both Sampras and Courier won their first grandslam before Agassi. They actually beat Agassi in their maiden grandslam finals.
@michelez7153 ай бұрын
Didn't Chang win a GS before the other three?
@suatkayatennis3 ай бұрын
@@michelez715 yes,he won the french open in 1989.
@redrum212253 ай бұрын
@@michelez715 Yeah. Chang was before Pete/Courier. I remember that he won the French in 89. He turned pro a couple years after Agassi. That's why I don't group him with sampras, courier, etc.
@radiohead2206Ай бұрын
It seems Pete has such an open stance hitting backhand. I wonder maybe his left eye is dominant? No one talks about that. I am guessing here.
@kennyg56783 ай бұрын
Does anybody know the final score?
@lijianzhang61463 ай бұрын
Sampras won the match in a five-set battle with the score of 7-5, 4-6, 6-4, 7-5, 6-4. Sampras then went on to win the US Open that year, defeating Andre Agassi in the final.
@jwsaberfan77933 ай бұрын
Sampras won in a four-set match: 7-5, 4-6, 6-4, 7-5
@nordattack3 ай бұрын
Hard to follow these highlights with no score being shown.
@mikimallek3572Ай бұрын
Pete won rom and kitzbühel on clay...and the semi final at the french open
@mikimallek3572Ай бұрын
Pete was also good on clay
@YuliusBulan-hk8ll2 ай бұрын
Courier racket unbranded?
@newworldharbourАй бұрын
Both players use the same model, Wilson PRO Staff 85sq but pretty sure different weight.
@mikimallek3572Ай бұрын
Boris becker never won a tournament on clay his entire carrer
@rogerparker4468Ай бұрын
No fist pump and scowl at the other player after every point? Yawnnnnnnn
@fraerithlelfe60273 ай бұрын
Any score displayed... A little boring despite the quality of the game.
@YuliusBulan-hk8llАй бұрын
Sampras never champion in Roland garros
@doncarlitovlog79023 ай бұрын
Federer and Nadal changed the game forever. They played tennis on an exceptional level. Nothing compared to this.
@newworldharbourАй бұрын
The technologies of the racquets and the poly strings have a huge impact to today's tennis. I'd like to see Nadal use this Wilson PRO Staff Original 85sq inch head size racquet with Natural gut strings.
@ldp80533 ай бұрын
Sampras backhand is not that good for this reason he never won French open and he is not at the level of the big 3 …
@stockton3503 ай бұрын
By that logic, Courier had a great backhand.
@freretuck54663 ай бұрын
Clay is the surface with the least backhand requirement, as you run around it half the time. If what you mean is that it's more fragile on clay, yeah like every one hander. His game just didn't suit clay.
@michelez7153 ай бұрын
Sampras's backhand stronger than Federer's. It only appears weaker compared to his outstanding forehand.
@ldp80533 ай бұрын
Saying that Sampras backhand is better than Federer shows that you don’t know anything about tennis … Sampras had better serve and better serve and volley forehand were even backhand not comparison by the the way Federer was superior in every aspects and the history showed that …
@turdferguson23 ай бұрын
I've taken a decade long break from watching or playing tennis and tennis fans are still the most pedantic annoying argumentative people imaginable