Phenomenological Psychology | Book Discussion

[@mellonglass]

Isn’t the crisis ‘individualism’ and the duopolistic analysis of spells. Spells being the ambiguity of language? When an ‘ego’ (the made up word) has a sharing capacity, ie, how we are born of three and not the singular patriarch of dominance, can have a choice of nurture, instead of word bashing. The mind it seems, barely knows its own thoughts in exaggerated words of a prerequisite use of romance and Privilege, that perhaps misses the ingredients of subjective rationality. Ie the mind and body separation and the search for linear occurrence within a multiplex of new thoughts every few seconds. The Jedi mind trick of Priviledge is to convince another who can not protest with their own words, because they have no time to form them. The word ‘you’ is the obstacle of other languages that have no word for objectivity to point to, the conditioning is fixated to fix, with tinkering, not reformulating agreeableness? It always seems to come down to freezing something in order to discover its deadness, instead of dancing with the possibility?