I was trying to grasp these concepts for more than five hours. Thank you !! You're a life saver
@oer-vlc11 жыл бұрын
You are absolutely right. I added the annotation at 6:56 that Jakobson was a Russian. I am really grateful for corrections of this kind. This improves the quality of our videos enormously.
@DD-jy8sj3 жыл бұрын
Trubetzkoy and Jakobson -> it was Soviet Union back then, so the flag is also not accurate
@EmmyAziz8 жыл бұрын
This is definitely the best KZbin Channel! Thank you for this treasure!
@LaithSalim Жыл бұрын
this explanation was so detailed and interesting thank you !
@avidreader1004 жыл бұрын
I was watching the phonology playlist in the order in which videos were arranged or played naturally in youtube. I found the 7th video PHY103 referred to the 6th Video PHY104 as the second of a two part explanation. I had seen such sequence related confusion in some other play lists also. Kindly confirm if these do not matter, or have been arranged in a specific order for any reason.
@إخلاصعونجعفرشعبه3 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot, I wanna ask you this question, can distinctive features theory be applied to syntax? Or other fields of linguistics?? Or only in phonology and phonetics, please I need an answer, if yes, tell me how,?
@yuanchenbao9353 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@sarahajoot24203 жыл бұрын
I was able to understand the distinctive feature thank you
@abramoibra38578 жыл бұрын
Many many thanks Sir, this is very helpful.
@nabilelhaddad406110 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for thise video.
@avidreader1004 жыл бұрын
Are diffuse and compact complementary? That is to say, is +diffuse equivalent to -compact and +compact equivalent to -diffuse ?
@hassankareem7318 жыл бұрын
wonderful lesson thank you very much
@berkiuao11 жыл бұрын
A great video and a great explanation !!! you have solved all my doubts :)
@habibasemmeg22337 жыл бұрын
many thanks!
@meandorphanstv73727 жыл бұрын
thanks sir but i have a question apart, there's difference between sound patterns in languages and distinctive features in languages?
@AdamOu0111 жыл бұрын
First :) Thanks Sir, your videos are very useful
@soufianesfn11 жыл бұрын
I have been watching your lectures lately and i want to thank you Sir for the immense effort to impart your knoledge with students like myself. i have question if you do not mind, and that is : in Chomsky's SPE System of Distinctive Features the feature [anterior] is mentioned when ''the main obstruction of the airstream is at a point no farther back in the mouth than the alveolar ridge'' p.44; and he adds ''Labials, dentals[...] are anterior'' p.44. and you professor has given /p/ the feature [-anterior] even if it is Labial. in addition, i have come thrrough some texts arguing that ' Anterior segments are articulated with the tip or blade of the tongue at or in front of the alveolar ridge' . i am a bit confused whether labials are anteriors (as quoted from Chomsky) or they are not. thank you in advance Sir for your time :)
@DocumGaia11 жыл бұрын
Hello and thank you for this lesson. Can I ask you something? Well, I read that the feature anterior designates all those sounds produced with the front part of the mouth: lips, teeth and alveolar ridges. So /p/ would be +anterior -coronal. Now I am confused! Could you clarify that to me, please?
@hajarhoumady5701 Жыл бұрын
I was just about to say the same thing when i saw your comment yes you are right because it's articulated at the level of the lips
@jacobthaisen864011 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this very nice lecture. However, permit me one small correction: Roman Jakobson was a Russian.
@mrkalla94658 жыл бұрын
thank you
@niveennammar926410 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!!!!!
@Linguistics19773 жыл бұрын
Roman Jacobson is a Russian - American linguist
@BlaherTiger7 жыл бұрын
But [c] isn't articulated with the blade of the tongue... TBH, Chomsky's theory is really incoherent and overrated. There are ways simpler than that.