The Yamaha seems to have a clean tone. The Kawai seems like it has a warmer more colorful sound.
@markshilov7067 Жыл бұрын
Despite the fact that all Kawai pianos have a bit tighter touch (from what I experienced), I prefer Kawai. That’s the sound I hear in my head, when asked “what does piano sound like?” And it’s wonderfully magical
@sebastienrodrigues94072 ай бұрын
Very interesting comparison. I really prefer the C3 from Yamaha.
@JimRockfordFiles11 ай бұрын
lol. You did all that bass movement on the Kawai but not the Yamaha. The Kawai is way too bright and kinda metallic, In addition to it also sounding like an electric keyboard, while the Yamaha is almost voiced like a Steinway. I am listening with headphones on.
@benjaminsmith228710 ай бұрын
Honestly, this Kawai is too "blurry." I'd sharpen up its hammers. Yamaha is good enough but I prefer the CX series.
@joonjeong48789 ай бұрын
Yamaha CX sound is warm and colorful but didn't lose its crispness. GXs are also very nice pianos but some of them had sluggish and heavy touch. For Yamaha CXs had more consistent touch and tone. I tried many CX and GX grands but CX were much better for recording. For recording, CXs were much easier for good quality sound but it's actually the matter of preference.
@geraldkohar10 ай бұрын
Kawai RX3 is mumbling and dull, while Yamaha C3 is clear. Of course C3 is better.
@geoff7517 Жыл бұрын
The RX3 sounds more full and resonant.
@matthewraden5210 Жыл бұрын
It would be more accurate to compare a Yamaha CX-3 to a Kawai RX-3. Since the C3 is an older model, it’s like comparing apples to oranges.
@jacobneal8090 Жыл бұрын
The RX is old. The series came out in 1995. The Kawai GX series is more comparable to the Yamaha CX series.
@benjaminsmith228710 ай бұрын
I disagree. The C3 is comparable to the RX-3. The CX-3 is comparable to the GX-3.