Pilot Blog | Boeing is Guilty for Boeing-737 MAX crashes but tries to buy off in the court

[@Redri747]

Thank you Denys 😎 Good to see you on this side as well . Greetings from South Africa

[@martinlatvian5538]

I did watch the full testimony. Makes a lot of sense. But I still dont understand why my comentz were deleted. Thanks for the video Denys. Been Your subscriber for almost 3 years.

[@MatMat-oq9yd]

Great to see aviation content too. I was missing it a lot! Your fellow Patreon supporter and long time fan from Slovakia.

[@Pär-Erik]

Great video Denys

[@gpaull2]

To be fair dish soap is commonly used to lubricate seals and decals for installation on all aircraft.

[@johnhaller5851]

Worked great on the Tesla CyberTruck brakes.

[@frosty_23647]

U look leaner! good job

[@320RS]

Hi captain ❤

[@noodles411]

My Dreams job is a pilot so your great❤

[@betsy6202]

Denys!!!!! Thanks for your energy in this video ❤✈ Stay safe in France Denys!!!!!! 😘 Xx.........

[@Ibrahimpoyraz-sy7qs]

I want to be a pilot like you, you are a very good man and please make cockpit videos

[@inniyan-ef4nh]

Big fan sir!!!!!

[@zlm001]

The fact that MCAS relied on a single AoA sensor is just dumbfounding. Plane makers and Boeing have been using augmentation programming for decades. If the augmentation system can start ordering full nose down trim due to a single sensor giving incorrect readings, with no error messages, you have designed the system in a negligent way. Part of me feels like some of this stuff, like the programming or something, was contracted out to people who know nothing about aviation. Maybe they knew it was dumb, but the engineers were so rushed that they decided it was fine since you can just use the runaway trim procedure. The problem is that AoA sensors fail all the time. It’s not a super rare event at all and the runaway trim procedure makes it difficult to trim the plane. It takes forever to move the trim with that tiny little wheel, especially with such a big plane traveling at high speeds. Maybe the programmers thought training would help, but of course that got buried due to the demands of airlines for training. Anyways, this issue was fairly easy to foresee, especially compared to other issues that arise with designing airplanes. It was also extremely easy to fix with some code to either disable MCAS or by using multiple AoA sensors. I think some of the whistleblowers are correct, but I do feel like some of the outrage might be unwarranted. Lot’s of industries have processes that seem like they are unsafe until you understand why it’s set up the way it is and what the critical factors are for each process and procedure. Still, Boeing definitely screwed the pooch. Businesses just feel like they are squeezing and squeezing to be leaner and leaner and the employees and customers hate it. Screw shareholder value. I understand why it’s there and the idea is important, but it seems like every part of life that sucks just gets worse when a business person decides the company needs to cut costs and increase revenue at all costs.

[@johannesbols57]

I understood from the spouse of a Boeing 787 team member that the team members were not going to fly the 787 during testing due to their lack of confidence in its airworthiness.

[@jostmathe]

Are you back to aviation 😮

[@SatvikGoud]

any aspiring pilots ? ✈

[@JacobsPlanespotting]

W

[@Eerr80]

جميل استمر❤❤

[@plawanwannasap9002]

I want to be a pilot what university should I go to?

[@NecheNassim]

Denys you retired right , but im any possible way can you unretire, i miss your flight 😢

[@nikkipowers6597]

I'd like to see this in court

[@TheKaidynB]

Oh how boeing has fallen….. shame. I used to love them. I’m still trying to hold on to my love for Boeing but they have gone downhill. Much like my mental health….

[@TheBmco99]

I think at least one of the CEOs should have to spend some jail time. There was several people killed because of their negligence and greed. This aircraft is still unsafe to fly. They don’t have an automated switch on the deicing if the pilots leave a switch on too long, it can cause a firein the engines, causing catastrophic crash, possibly along with items being built in Asia and parts of the engines being built in Iran, which a country that hates Americans I don’t feel too good about flying on any Boeing aircraft anymore. They need to get back to the basics make this aircraft and don’t worry about the profit until they fix their problems.

[@tomlobos2871]

the entire story is kind of sketchy. i dont want to get too far off, or enter the realms of conspiracy, but have my own unfinished theory. please take this with a grain of salt, just guessing here. boeing has highest quality standards and it should not have happened in first place. it's not only one problem that has to be phased out. if one occurs, another different one pops up. how can that happen? blaming boeing for lazyness is easy, but they know too well that this is connected to their reputation as a manufacturer, maybe one of the most important factors for sales. just looking at it as an outsider this stinks like sabotage. civilian world and military projects share technology quite a bit. it is hard to infiltrate military production, easier on the civilian branch, even more on subcontractors. and it looks a bit like boeing is trying to cope with that without telling anyone. nobody would buy anymore if it's known they are sabotaged. civilian aviation sales allows them to invest into r&d and keep unit prices for military projects low. much of that is about shareholder's money as well. so the current stoyline is less bad for them, though it's already really really bad. now imagine boeing falling apart or splitting up into smaller companys. boeing is one of the largest defence contractors and involved in all spheres of it. including icbm's, strategic transport aircraft, fighter jets, missiles and a huge space section. this makes it a core asset in american, or generally speaking in western defence technology. if i would pick a company to sabotage, they are at the top of a long list. we've seen acts of sabotage against europe defence contractors already.

[@YouScroob]

You are closer to the truth than you think on this. I was part of aviation manufacturing (commercial and military) for 40 years. In the mid 1980s it was common knowledge that Airbus's main goal was to put Boeing out of business. A few years ago, Airbus had to pay huge fines for bribing airline executives to buy their equipment. In January of 2022, it was reported that Airbus was bribing Zelensky to equip his new state owned airline with Airbus planes. While the US was warning him of the Russian buildup ( Which he ignored), Zelensky was organizing this new airline with the support of his boss, Igor Kolomoisky, the owner of UIA. Yes, we have a big corruption problem here in the US, but the American people are capable of eliminating it, as compared to Ukraine, where corruption is deeply imbedded in the culture, from the common people to the leaders. Google " Airbus Zelensky", you will see. The geographical center of Europe is in Ukraine. Airbus has plans not only to bribe for sales, but to invest in four Ukrainian airports to build their own European Empire.

[@tomlobos2871]

​@@YouScroob actually i did not mention corruption once, or pointed on it in any way. my comment was about economical sabotage. but intresting how far you went off topic and were able to guide a reader towards false information nobody asked for.

[@TheAviationPro737]

First like and comment

[@gpaull2]

You have won a prestigious internet prize! Please accept this extended middle finger along with our outmost respect. Sadly the rules dictate that you will be pushed into second place if there are any pinned comments. 😢

[@CheapButNotEasy]

There is an army of lawyers and media relations people inside this guys head making his lips move. Every now and then a CEO who perpetrates a great fraud goes to prison, but he'll probably get away with what he has done at Boeing.

[@Itsjustme-Justme]

In the first place, Boeing is guilty of having failed to design a brand new replacement for the 737 in time. Boeing had no alternative to quickly developing the "classic series" in reaction to Airbus announcing the developement of what became the A320. The "classic series" was a simple engine upgrade with rather little airframe changes and it was working fine, nothing wrong about it. To keep up with the A320 the "classic series" was later replaced by the "nect gen series". Including an expensive wing redesign, it was a more dangerous decision than designing the "classic series". It's a good design and it's massive success on the market proved the decision right. Then the big mistake was made. They should have started the developement of an all new, safe and highly efficient replacement as soon as design work on the "next gen" was finished in the mid 90s. But they didn't. Instead, Boeing just happily took all the money from mass producing the "next gen" and acted like that would go on forever. When news about a much more efficient A320 upgrade first came out, Boeing hat nothing on hand to counter the Airbus design. 10 years after a potential market entry of a brand new replacement design, Boeing got catapulted back in the 80s, being forced to quickly develope another stop gap solution, the "MAX series". But this time they failed horribly because they overstretched the design limits and therefore created an unsafe aircraft. As if that wasn't enough, Boeing reduced quality to compensate for lost profits. That's insane, to say at least. People who act like that should not be allowed to build aircraft ever again.

[@god-son-love]

Winner's dilemma. It was so successful that it gradually loses its competitiveness by cutting corners. It probably laid off the most competent and loyal workers.

[@anitaroberts8729]

I'm so glad you are not flying the Max! I would like to give you a nice safe Airbus! 🛩💙💛🛩

[@رافضي_ماينقنع]

Second

[@zlm001]

The fact that MCAS relied on a single AoA sensor is just dumbfounding. Plane makers and Boeing have been using augmentation programming for decades. If the augmentation system can start ordering full nose down trim due to a single sensor giving incorrect readings, with no error messages, you have designed the system in a negligent way. Part of me feels like some of this stuff, like the programming or something, was contracted out to people who know nothing about aviation. Maybe they knew it was dumb, but the engineers were so rushed that they decided it was fine since you can just use the runaway trim procedure. The problem is that AoA sensors fail all the time. It’s not a super rare event at all and the runaway trim procedure makes it difficult to trim the plane. It takes forever to move the trim with that tiny little wheel, especially with such a big plane traveling at high speeds. Maybe the programmers thought training would help, but of course that got buried due to the demands of airlines for training. Anyways, this issue was fairly easy to foresee, especially compared to other issues that arise with designing airplanes. It was also extremely easy to fix with some code to either disable MCAS or by using multiple AoA sensors. I think some of the whistleblowers are correct, but I do feel like some of the outrage might be unwarranted. Lot’s of industries have processes that seem like they are unsafe until you understand why it’s set up the way it is and what the critical factors are for each process and procedure. Still, Boeing definitely screwed the pooch. Businesses just feel like they are squeezing and squeezing to be leaner and leaner and the employees and customers hate it. Screw shareholder value. I understand why it’s there and the idea is important, but it seems like every part of life that sucks just gets worse when a business person decides the company needs to cut costs and increase revenue at all costs. Also, it’s crazy when whole departments have their bonuses denied because part or all of the company had a rough year or didn’t meet some insane target, yet upper management continues to get their bonuses and even raises.