Plane Stalls Over The Runway

[@bluesatsunset]

Not even close to a stall, tail strike or a hard landing. Very well controlled landing in challenging conditions.

[@garyrowe5984]

I agree , very nice landing under those conditions.

[@joelighty409]

@@garyrowe5984 I disagree - early, over-flare, followed by held high with decreasing airspeed is NOT a "very nice landing" - however, granted, the touch down was not a terrible as it could have been.

[@michaelsimpson9779]

Absolutely right..... who wrote that..........? Crosswind gust I'd say, no stall or harsh increase in rate of descent......

[@mrkrkra5000]

It was not a good landing. This flare is out of standard. It isn't normal do like that, just compare with another landings in the same airport and situation. I don't think that the plane stall, but something unusual happened.

[@PS-zw4yc]

100% good landing

[@captaingyro3912]

The aircraft is in ground effect, where stall speed is drastically reduced. This aircraft is nowhere near a stall. Other than a slight balloon which the pilot handled with skill there was nothing wrong with this landing.

[@miked5539]

The creator of this video probably thinks extreme turbulence is when his seat back comes forward.

[@oldmech619]

The touchdown was good, but the fare was terrible. He should not have hand flown that landing with such low minimums.

[@captaingyro3912]

​@@oldmech619 For a modern airliner these minimums aren't that low. And just out of curiosity, how many airliner landings have you logged in that armchair?

[@oldmech619]

@@captaingyro3912 You are correct that I have not made an approach to min in a Heavy Jet. I have made hand approaches to 300 ft in my Mooney M20e. As a long time avionics and maintenance tech on heavy jets, I do have experience with flyt crews doing approaches. I have set in the cockpit during minimum approaches to Cat 3a and 3b (they are fun). And I have actually flown real full motion flight sims for the B747 and A300. I real did get white knuckles on those approaches. Yeah, I did have a real 747 pilot let me fly for for about 30 minutes in cruise. The lag in the controls just blew me away. Yes, you are correct, I have not made an approach to min as PIC in a jet. Small plane, yes. I stay with my original statement. That approach was terrible. I was always taught, if you are Not Stable on short Final, GoAround. And Capt Gyro, What were you taught to do if your approach is unstable? Get it on the ground at all cost. Plz answer the question, What were you taught Captain.

[@oldmech619]

@@captaingyro3912 and another thing, I know what a hard landing is. I have have to replace too many tires and had to do too many hard landing inspections. That pilot should have been written up by Company. As a mechanic waiting for my flyt to come in, I have a watched maybe a couple thousand landings at LAX. All those landing were proceeded by a short final and flair. I know what a good and bad final looks like.

[@turdwarbler]

it wasn't stalled at all.

[@boblawblaw6875]

It looked like a controlled routine landing in some fog

[@josephrasberry3850]

Didn’t look like a stall to me looked like a normal landing

[@Virtualmix]

Definitely not a stall

[@eshaansolanki4540]

No stall 3 min aviation's mind is stalled

[@Simon_2020]

As a pilot, that was definitely a stall.

[@jayceec_ross]

A bouncey landing, but no evidence of an impending/saved tail strike.

[@ruddigerburns9051]

They where carrying a lot of speed. They did good job of bleeding off airspeed.

[@TheGamesADAMS]

he was breaking the speed and the runway was wet, good job here imo

[@REDMAN298]

watch the elevator and you`ll see "a last minute nose down input" is bullshit. Didn`t happen.

[@danny208YT]

Yeah turned out smooth and well done.

[@timetravellergec2043]

Hard landing and slowing to the maximum possible before touch down in wet condition to avoid hydroplanning. Common way to land in wet weather.

[@CartoonWeasel]

That landing was perfectly fine for the weather

[@TeBo9126]

das war eine kontrollierte Landung bei schlechtem Wetter.

[@yeppers7225]

WeaseL Logic. The landing of the triple was an awful landing, in any weather condition. The flying pilot flared way too high and instead of going around, continued, which resulted in a hard landing, most likely touching down 10 kts or more below Vref. The triple is by far, the easiest aircraft to land that I have flown.

[@hjhkgjfawdferyyurv1222]

@@yeppers7225 nah, the weather is bad tho, fly on Ryanair and you will finally know what is a hard landing

[@hjhkgjfawdferyyurv1222]

@@yeppers7225 the landing was fine

[@mikespeers8281]

@@yeppers7225 really, who do you fly for and how current are you? I saw nothing untoward at all.

[@jsm-yc2wz]

The force that the front wheel suspension on the 777 can handle is amazing.

[@davidtsw]

You´ve been doing these videos for so long and you still haven´t learned that people don´t appreciate clickbaity titles ?

[@marktibbetts3799]

Baloney,the landing was fine

[@GRosa250]

I’m glad I’m not the only one who feels that way. I don’t believe there was any stall. You can see the airflow (as a result of the condensation) over the top of the wings never appears to separate from the wing or become turbulent.

[@mofamba]

Totally

[@koborkutya7338]

Was a nice job in those condition, nowhere near a stall. Had some rolling due to turbulence and that, with the high AOA was confused with a stall condition. Pilot slammed it down to avoid drifting but no stall round. Well done.

[@Milamberinx]

I agree, the text said a stall and a last minute nose down. If the aircraft were stalling the control surfaces wouldn't have produced the nose down. Just looks like a high-ish flare to me.

[@chrisanderson1543]

I agree with Mary!

[@markbonney2511]

Tailstrike? Nah. Stall? Nope. Fairly standard crosswind landing in crappy weather? Yep.

[@emergencylowmaneuvering7350]

Of course he stalled it. You cannot tell a stall from a crosswind landing touch down? You never slow it down that way on a crosswind landing. Slower is gets harder to control. That is the opposite you do on crosswind landing touchdowns.

[@bobdavey1195]

@@emergencylowmaneuvering7350 how can you estimate the aircraft's speed from that angle? Lens compression is also an issue

[@emergencylowmaneuvering7350]

@@bobdavey1195 Looks slow and also it drop from around 20 feet high.

[@CTMKD]

@@emergencylowmaneuvering7350 please... look at almost all crosswind landings, they look like that

[@emergencylowmaneuvering7350]

@@CTMKD No, I teach crosswind landings with strong winds. you cannot slow down and stall it like that. Andit is bullshit that all crosswind landings look like that. Bullshit..

[@kasuraga]

That catapult launch looked like a lot of fun haha the pilots reaction is golden. I bet it never gets old feeling those sleds launch you off the ship.

[@bricefleckenstein9666]

It's an interesting experience. I got to be in a cat shot once - on a C2, which is VERY similar to the Hawkeye. Didn't get to see the cockpit view though.

[@WhiskeyGulf71]

When you take out all the intro, outro, clip intros & slow mo replay, this becomes 2 minutes of aviation

[@Whizify]

True

[@ScumfuckMcDoucheface]

hahaha yeah man this was a pretty tame video compared to their usual from the few I've seen

[@sundar999]

I wonder if "3 Minutes of Aviation#" knows much about aviation

[@LeonDerczynski]

the old format was so good

[@orionlucio6817]

Yea lol

[@ivanquaglio2242]

Yes but the intro music desintegrated my balls honestly

[@GRAHAMAUS]

Perfectly normal landing given the conditions.

[@skylerpage8778]

totally incorrect

[@ugiswrong]

I know right! Looked good

[@StoffelNZ]

What conditions? Poor visibility but hardly a breath of wind.The long grass is barely moving

[@windowseat7334]

Er, no, that’s not normal?! That was an unusual attitude for the phase of flight from which they should have gone around.

[@jonslg240]

Lol was gonna comment the same thing, just different: The pilots of #1: "Fsck you we did great" lol

[@iain8837]

Didn't stall, wouldn't have been a tail strike, and it certainly wasn't a hard landing. No need for an inspection, no incident report etc. KZbin dramatization at it's best.

[@zzgaming29]

That was a horrible landing, what are you one about? Do you work for Ryanair or something?

[@thewildbikechannel]

True, was not to bad for the weather.

[@Kalvinjj]

@@zzgaming29 If you want super smooth landings on heavy rain, you better have quite a few miles of runway to stop on spoilers, air brakes and reversers alone. If you expect the wheels to do any of the work, you slam it.

[@iain8837]

@@zzgaming29 I never said it was pretty! It's just over dramatized like everything on youtube.

[@a320nick]

@Iain: Absolutely, this site is full of melodrama!!🙄 All the pilots did was land at the minimum touch down speed, to lessen the braking necessary for a wet runway. They weren't that heavy either.

[@CLINT-THE-GREAT]

Bring back the old format…… that’s what made this channel

[@cinegraphics]

You mean with lots of Aerosucre?

[@mpeg2tom]

I do miss the old music! At least no voice synthesis like Aviahub.

[@LeonDerczynski]

@@mpeg2tom agreed! voice synth is shit-tier content

[@davidanderson4091]

@@cinegraphics Aerosucre! The gift that keeps giving content!

[@SwavimanKumar]

@@mpeg2tom yeah yeah bring back the old into music. This is crap.

[@assessor1276]

I think you meant a longitudinal acceleration of 4G - (i.e. in the direction of aircraft travel). A transverse acceleration would be side-to-side from one wing tip to the other.

[@Skank_and_Gutterboy]

Good catch, that is right.

[@Rincypoopoo]

That was a nice crab/slip followed by a controlled float, and safe positive nose placement. No bounce, not a hard landing at all. Just a very nice piece of flying.

[@rubenjapp7626]

There was bounce. And it wasn't really a controlled float, rather, too high a flare. It worked, but I don't think many would say nice piece of flying. It seemed he was holding out the touchdown for too long and almost didn't lower the nose in time to avoid a tail strike.

[@NilsMueller]

please clean your glasses

[@-styx]

That moment when you tell 146K subscribers that "Plane Stalls Over The Runway" as if something is wrong. Hint: if the plane does not stall over the runway it carries on flying and does not land. If the plane stalls over the runway it stops flying and lands.

[@MrKnisterGer]

lmao

[@MBourner]

I don't think that's quite right. If we stalled our aircraft onto the runway every landing we would certainly be called in for tea and no biscuits.

[@oaktadopbok665]

@@MBourner Styx is correct every successful by-the-book landing ends in a stall.

[@MBourner]

@@oaktadopbok665 well the aircraft certainly stops flying at some point I agree with you. Stalling it on to or over the runway however is not quite how we're taught to fly heavy commercial aircraft. But I think I get the point you're making 🙂

[@sherwin1957]

That is certainly not how I was taught to fly Cessnas and Pipers back in the day. If you stall at touchdown you are going too slow and endangering life and aircraft.

[@MaximPro2903]

In the Aircraft Carrier takeoff, I loved when the pilot was like “Oh yeah!”

[@madamebkrt]

Same!

[@gregmarchegiani6656]

The Navy Hawkeye pilot seems to enjoy the sound of his own voice more than the flight itself! 😂😂😂

[@melissamariano7700]

Lul

[@jessstone7486]

Indeed! sounded way too casual for the situation! its that kind of flip talking that makes me awfully nervous! Seems not fully 'in the game' and not taking things as seriously as should be taken!!!

[@Dave_D]

I watched the full video of that a few weeks back and although I can’t remember the full story, it basically comes down to letting the rest of the crew in the back what is happening

[@alukuhito]

The annoying thing that is as a pilot you're supposed to keep the talking to a minimum. Talkative pilots are amateurs.

[@Dave_D]

@@alukuhito You seriously calling these guys amateurs?! They are some of the most professional crews in the world ffs. And just to clarify, this is copied and pasted from the original video where he explains all the chatter. 3. There are numerous radio frequencies intentionally not recorded and excluded from this audio. Often times a crew member is responding on ICS to something they heard on one of the radios making their statement seem strange without context to viewers of this video. 4. Keep in mind there are 5 of us in the aircraft. Up front it may seem like we’re giving a running commentary of things that may seem obvious. That’s because they’re not obvious to the three crew members in the aft portion of the aircraft who have little outside visibility (especially when the wings are folded). We give a play-by-play so everyone in the crew is always aware of where we are on the flight deck and how far along in the launch process we are.

[@searchresults1246]

My dad flew an S-2 from a carrier. Retired at 25 years and went on to work at GE. We had a very strained relationship throughout as depicted in The Great Santini with Robert Duval. These videos are healing and give great insight about his life and challenges. At 52 I am starting to understand his courage and regiment. I can not say I regret the discipline, it has served me well in many instances. Flung from a ship in an airplane takes a lot of balls and my hat is off to all those that welcome the risk for the sake of our freedom!

[@MarkSmith-js2pu]

He did alright by you.

[@makevic]

This 777 landing was just nice and nowhere near to stall or hard landing! Well done 👍

[@diegoramirez8674]

You clearly know nothing

[@connieembury1]

Love the pilot's view of the launch from the aircraft carrier. More of that please.

[@Beezlie727]

Pilot commentary was fun, too! 👍😀

[@ericlozen9631]

I was an Avionics Technician in the U.S. Navy and worked on several different aircraft models; the E-2C being one of them. This was in the late 1980's/early '90's. Her flight deck back then was pure analog. The modern day glass-cockpits definitely add a touch of class. These revisions can be seen in a few other older military aircraft models that are still active today.

[@lw216316]

the video said 4gs on launch - is that true? ... seems a bit much, 2 or 3 maybe?

[@Skank_and_Gutterboy]

I actually wish the S-3 was still around, I always thought they were cool.

[@ericlozen9631]

@@Skank_and_Gutterboy I totally agree. I always referred to her as "Snoopy"; large round nose. I had the privilege of serving on three aircraft carriers: CV-43, CV-60, and CVN-71. I took many pictures of the flight deck operations. During the catapult launch I loved the sound of the S-3's turbofan engines. They had a unique sound.

[@Skank_and_Gutterboy]

@@ericlozen9631 Yep. Did you know that the A-10 has the very same engines? I was with my girlfriend on my carrier's dependents' cruise and we were on the flight deck watching planes take off. The A-6 and F-14 were super loud and when the S-3 went past us on the cat, my girlfriend goes "WOW!!!" because the engines were so quiet and just sounded cool.

[@TobinTwinsHockey]

This is absolutely the best aviation themed channel if you love aviation misinformation.

[@wowoking2]

The first clip looks so eerie. Dude to the weather the plane looks like a massive creature trying to fight the winds.

[@dieterf.8826]

The first landing was completely normal. In windy conditions, the pilots touch down a little harder so that the wheels have some weight on them to counter crosswinds. That was a completely normal landing, no stall, no tail strike.

[@daveluttinen2547]

I would venture to say that the computer landed the plane since it can do a better job more consistently. That isn't to say the pilot could not do it, but generally airline policy has pilots use the computer.

[@a320nick]

Fine landing, looks good.

[@anmoljaiswal2117]

Pilots: During a catapult launch, pilots experience a transverse acceleration force of up to 4Gs Formula One drivers: That’s cute

[@CTMKD]

Fighter pilots: Thats cute

[@millomweb]

So far, only you seems to understand this ! LOL

[@jonviol]

Expert landing in poor weather/wind conditions. Perfect job .

[@Spyke-lz2hl]

Falcons take time for the nose to raise when heavily fueled. It’s actually in the manual that you may have to hold full aft yoke for a period of seconds to get the nose to do anything. I meant to add: you can see that these guys held the elevator up for a while, but if they were a little off on their speeds or didn’t give it the time it needed, or possibly didn’t brief or weren’t planning for this, it won’t work. You also have to know that it WILL work and not freak out and reject past V1.

[@davewilson6451]

Areosucre pilots would have had that thing in the air!

[@ManteIIo]

I quite don't understand how such things happen as V1 calculations are done for this particular situation and past it you have to fly no matter what? What would cause still try to stop plane knowing that past V1 it is a confirmed disaster-situation?

[@arandompersonontheinternet2282]

While you're right most of the time, if the plane won't fly, it's better to reject and overrun than takeoff and crash.

[@user-SunnyDAD]

It's always better to runoff a runway at taxi speed than crash from the air at flying speed.

[@13rdp]

@@ManteIIo V1 is computed for a balanced field where TODA=ASDA. What would be the idea of taking off after V1 with an impaired aircraft when you still have 3 km of rwy in front of you.

[@thebiffer100]

With due respect to your comments Kuwait "almost stall" landing avoids tail strike unless your are a qualified airline transport pilot with plenty of heavy jet experience you would know you are not qualified to judge and you are way off on your assumption. PLEASE do not publish inaccurate information instead of drawing attention to your story for the purpose of You Tube sensationalism. You could not be further from the truth. BTW I still enjoy your channel.

[@nelsonclub7722]

With due respect he did avoid a tail strike

[@joesnodgrass608]

@@nelsonclub7722 They were "closer" to suffering a wing strike than a tail strike. This is a cross wind landing. Looks like they came out of a crab a tad to early, and set her down firm.

[@michaelbond1839]

Knob

[@thebiffer100]

My hero

[@LetsGoAero]

Thanks for the your videos they're great! 👍🙂

[@aircraftspotter_bareilly]

Some day my aviation channel will also be popular 😌

[@aircraftspotter_bareilly]

Some day my aviation channel will also be popular 😌

[@bazoo513]

1:10 - What a beauty! The acceleration is backwards, into the seat back. 2:10 - Also a beauty - I _love_ Dassault's tri-jets.

[@HUNmerlin]

those rear landing gears are a beautiful piece of engineering

[@CrossWindsPat]

Yes they are. The brush of literal tons of weight falling out of the sky all day err day.

[@stevesilsby5288]

That's a fine, stabilized approach and landing.

[@ramjattanutsav]

Where are the older videos?

[@388sbc5]

Great landing

[@billywhizz6483]

Nothing wrong with the first clip, looked like a good landing considering the conditions.

[@19brandon66]

dumb title for video...no stall in that landing.

[@_Hyunism]

@@19brandon66 Ye it only looked like it stalled because of the Conditions

[@jayzenitram9621]

I'm not sure where the "stall" happened. I have no idea where this guy gets the ideas for his captions. They appear to be off about 60% of the time.

[@Kalvinjj]

Yeah it actually HAS to slam on hard rain to not hydroplan on the runway.

[@_Hyunism]

@@jayzenitram9621 Maybe he thought it was stalling because the Tail almost struck the runway

[@pedrocanom]

Excellent landing

[@texasbroker]

Every plane landing is technically “falling with style”

[@0lafs]

Even when its descending technically its falling with style:)

[@123antknee]

Awesome Handling... at one point, only the left wing landing gear is down, as the right landing gear makes contact then bounces off the runway! Awesome!

[@TomTom-jv5sv]

A stall? Do you know how a stall looks like?

[@Edwinlovesplanes]

I live in the Netherlands and it’s always bad weather and always has cross or headwinds so it didn’t stall

[@stevemiller1203]

Actually a great landing in those conditions

[@RioJudy]

Perfect landing! DID NOT STALL

[@barisyakut7970]

"Despite the hard landing, the aircraft is able to safely vacate the runway". Oh, thank God. I was so worried /s

[@paulvanobberghen]

In aviation parlance, the term "hard landing" is only used when a given vertical G load is reached (depending on the type), and something is broken on the airplane.

[@psrpippy]

What was wrong with the first landing? The tail didn’t seem any closer to the ground than usual and the pilot was ‘crabbing’ slightly against the cross wind. I don’t think a stall even came into it.

[@pbertf24]

You obviously know very little about airplanes this was a very skillfully done landing , trust me I’ve been doing it for 35 years

[@gregmarchegiani6656]

“Trust me I’ve been doing it for 35 years” is probably the aviation equivalent of of a fake dentist who haven’t gotten caught yet. 😂😂😂😂

[@goodboy23]

The pretentious introduction makes me doubt that even more.

[@RaysDad]

The 777 landing was really nice; the huge plane appears out of the mist flying really slow, then the pilots let the nose get a little high and they float, but they get the nose down quickly and the plane lands a little hard but safely. I didn't see a stall.

[@billmorris2613]

FYI: On the first clip, I have seen comments saying the crew busted minimums to find the runway. When the banner is removed @ the 0:15 mark the aircrafts landing lights are visible. The touch down was @ the 0:35 mark, 20 seconds later. The touchdown speed for the B-777 is around 150 + or - MPH, depending on the landing weightIn. AT 150 MPH in 20 seconds the aircraft would have traveled around 4,400 feet. Most normal Cat 1 ILS approaches have a decision height of around 200 feet AGL (above ground level) and an RVR (runway visual range) of 1,800 to 2,600 feet. A cat IIIc ILS can go to no limit on Decision Height and zero RVR. Cat II, IIIA, and IIIB are somewhere in between. We call the Cat IIIC a zero / zero approach. This aircraft is landing in a fog where the visibility can be the same vertically as it is horizontally for a given area as long as the fogs thickness is consistent.

[@usgator]

Could the 777 perhaps encountered wind shear, or was that just an unstable approach?

[@spongebubatz]

It was a windshear

[@euinhowie2303]

When you are flying in fog you have less visual queues, most pilots tend to over flare a bit leading to rounding out to early and a bit quick, tricky thing to get dead right.

[@TheSoaringChannel]

Simply a poor touch down unfortunately. Just a matter of time.

[@2lotusman851]

He just flared too early. Tried to land 10 feet too high Got caught out in the scenario of---dont ever release back pressure on the controls as the nose will drop out on you if you do, then the airplane will really smack the runway hard. So, just a shitty landing. Needs more practice in a Cessna 172.

[@usgator]

@@2lotusman851 ah, ok. Thanks. Yeah, it looks like he just fell the last 10 feet.

[@ChiTownDude]

Scare monger. “Almost” tail strike is ludicrous. Great piloting.

[@adnanaslam3424]

Where are all the old videos?

[@justafriendlyguy8858]

WOW I WAS THERE also I’m from kuwait

[@femanvate]

Landing gear are the real heroes of aviation.

[@theacechip]

I'd say the wings ,elevators and tail plane. The rest of the plane may as well be a sack of potatoes.

[@usmale49]

Great video...I appreciate the work you put into these! Thank you for posting!

[@brettnackley]

Ryan Air: He shows potential, we just need to train him to land that way every time.

[@simonm1447]

Also Ryanair: we only accept pilots who have at least 10 carrier landings

[@LA-ep2nr]

1:10 I love the crew interaction and Communication leading up the to launch. I also, liked the visuals of the deck crew choreography and catapult launch. To all of our aviators, please stay safe and thanks for your service.

[@CartoonWeasel]

At 3:04 there is nothing of what you say. Its actually the end of the video

[@LA-ep2nr]

@@CartoonWeasel Thanks bro. I Was looking at the wrong numbers.

[@jimberg3088]

There was no stall on Kuwait jet. Crosswinds and ground effect affect a/c attitude. A stall doesn’t lower nose, it lowers a wing. The stall affects the wing BPC the wing stalls. Nose attitude is NEVER lowered on final - ever.

[@petebuck9889]

Is it just me or have they pulled hundreds of videos off the playlist?

[@nelsonclub7722]

Lets get a run down of the first landing from the armchair pilots in chat Too high Too low Too slow Too much flare Not enough flare Not enough throttle Should have gone around Should have landed earlier Below minimums Above maximums Almost a stall Almost a strike And it goes on... Luckily none of us will ever have to fly with these people. My take? Thanks for posting; carry on.

[@ChaoticBean794]

Yea, those flight simmers sure know a lot

[@robertborchert932]

Indeed. Pilot settled her down, didn't appear as much an impending stall as some crosswind. Haters, hehe.

[@alanbiles9912]

Well yes, but at the end of the day, he really should have gone around. It wasn't exactly a stable approach.

[@musography6958]

@@alanbiles9912 I think you're one of those armchair pilots mentioned in the comments above, please go back to your game!

[@Ν11-φ9ρ]

At Ryanair you get all these thrills for FREE !! ( but then... they make you pay for pretty much every single extra thing !)

[@stuartd01]

For the armchair pilots, at no point does a stall occur. A significant margin is applied to compensate for windspeed, especially on gusty days which can seriously affect airspeed. And given the horizontal attitude due to compensating for the crosswind, had a stall occurred it would have likely affected only one wing, the right wing, and the aircraft would have spun to the right, nose down. With regards to the aircraft attitude, if you watch the whole landing sequence carefully the actual pitch of the aircraft doesn't change at all, from the beginning of the flare to the point of touchdown. There's also a cross-wind component, you can see the aircraft is yawing in to wind (to the right) at the beginning of the video and again after the wing gets picked up by a gust at 0.32. This presents more of the fuselage to the camera, and that with the fact that the aircraft is moving towards the camera gives the appearance that the aircraft is in a high nose-up attitude when it isn't. When the nose comes down it happens at the same time as the right hand wing, due to pilot overcompensation as a result of the gust, which exacerbates the apparent movement of the aircraft nose. This is a standard cross-wind landing, in gusty conditions.

[@JosephLust]

Nice catapult launch. Surprised the airspeed was already 51kts before launch, must have a good headwind, and be sailing into the wind quickly. A second or two later, 140kts. Not bad.

[@Cissy2cute]

Love that cockpit view!

[@simu31]

Looked distinctly like that Falcon didn't have it's flaps deployed; would explain why it didn't rotate at Vr

[@cinegraphics]

My thoughts exactly. Flaps were up.

[@swannvictor1388]

really bad flying. makes one wonder about the qualifications of the pilots, I mean, Flaps for gods sake?! And where was their V1 calculation?

[@MrKapeji]

Well it looks like the flaps were set on position one to me, check the image at 2:19, you can see clearly that the flaps are deployed.

[@cinegraphics]

@@MrKapeji even if they are, that's not enough flaps for takeoff.

[@78XT500]

The Falcon 900's have a horizontal trim setting issue at forward CoGs. I set the stab trim quite nose up to the point just before the configuration warning at heavy weights. It makes for a much better rotation control wheel force.

[@johnjerrehian4642]

It always seems like a fast 3 minutes! Good videos :)

[@SG_aviation_geek]

Cool 😎 video.

[@hanoverbill8174]

I wouldn't call it a stall, I'd call it a good landing in bad weather.

[@therelaxedguy542]

Bring back the old intro!!! Awesome video

[@evaluateanalysis7974]

1:55 "Transverse acceleration of up to 4Gs" Transverse means "sideways". I don't think that's what he means.

[@raymondherbst7126]

The flare & landing were fine. Look at the vortices coming over the wing by the engines… airflow is fine! Not near a stall.

[@LesleyDT6227]

Another fabulous vid. Thanks

[@weakbonesmurphy]

The people on here saying that landing is normal clearly haven’t seen many landings before and also clearly have never been at the controls to know how close that was. Scary stuff

[@apocalips8008]

Close to what ?

[@weakbonesmurphy]

@@apocalips8008 the aircraft hitting the runway tail first

[@Skank_and_Gutterboy]

That makes one of you.

[@KongKurs]

Actually close to a butter landing, given the circumstances

[@repvoid7680]

Thank you for changing the music, it doesn't feel like 2007 anymore!

[@bobspafford3519]

My instructor was a lifetime carrier pilot. We did a full hour of touch & go practice and EVERY ONE of his t&gs were preceded by stall horns coming on before touchdown, and Every lift off was done with stall horns still full on! So, my stall horn anxieties faded away after that hour. Not every horn sounding means that a crash is imminent.

[@Gregorius421]

The 777 flared early, too much and floated. The bird did not skip leg day.

[@craiggilchrist4223]

Nowhere near a stall. Great landing.

[@markhugo8270]

Nope, he didn't even use up 1/2 the hydraulic Strut travel, no stall...standard procedure in a challenging cross wind the buffet on the way in. Good landing over all.

[@Thankz4sharing]

I was a passenger on a few C-1 and C-2 cat launches. Once I saw a Chief's hat get loose during a launch. It almost immediately struck the rear bulkhead with great force. Lesson: ALL loose items must be secure before launch. Recoveries were fun, too. Looking down from the rear facing passenger seats on landing approach you see the ocean getting closer. Then the ship's deck appears to jump up suddenly, the hook catches and a couple of seconds later it's all over.

[@isaacpek4018]

The general rule of thumb is to reduce your throttle to zero above the threshold for all landings, so if you’re talking about a landing, it is basically a controlled stall, no such thing as “a stall during landing”

[@109-w7v]

My suggestion is stick to Microsoft flight simulator.

[@guycore5478]

Love the new format!

[@lutomson3496]

Should have had the landing along with the launch off the carrier, Ive done a few on an old S-3 landings at night were never fun

[@lucastekkan]

I can imagine the stress.

[@4thforcon426]

I cannot think of any other part of the aircraft that endures more stress, vibration, and shear impact forces than the landing gear. to absorb that much force on landing is nothing short of a marvel of engineering.

[@EasyModeFishing]

That first landing was perfect. Absolutely nothing wrong with it.

[@dmedlin8118]

No tailstrike. No stall. The pilot wanting to plant the plane firmly given the conditions? Yes. Good landing IMO.

[@VidClips858]

I had heard the ATC on the Falcon runway overrun but wasn't aware video existed.

[@TheSoaringChannel]

Where can I find it?

[@VidClips858]

@@TheSoaringChannel LiveATC.net is where I heard it.

[@jonslg240]

Holy shit that last one was gnarly! Too bad there wasn't a closer camera angle because that was pretty badass

[@bugjuicer]

1st one is smooth, from some of the budget airlines I've seen..

[@MrDumile]

I'm not sure you normally stall tail first? But the carrier takeoff looked like fun!

[@nurrizadjatmiko21]

0:08 pro pilots as always👍

[@yashwantsingh5928]

Why you deleted the old videos...they were doing quite good

[@pendesign7086]

What happened to all the older videos? I was binge watching but now they are gone 🥺

[@sincerelovechild]

That was a perfect landing

[@mykalhenry]

that was some pretty good "lets just get it down and not go around in this mess"

[@skim4me]

Wow!! Perfect landing!

[@aviationin4k258]

He didn’t stall he just floated and did an early flare

[@kais.8235]

Floated THEN stalled

[@aviationin4k258]

@@kais.8235 he didn’t stall

[@Kalvinjj]

@@kais.8235 It was just a typical heavy rain slam landing. You don't butter it up on hard rain or you'll be hyrdroplaning on the runway and not stop at the end.

[@gregfaris6959]

Normal landing - well controlled in the circumstances.