There might be an error on the illustration at 10:30. should the IAA be at the shaded side?
@ankiemightprobablybeankie28984 жыл бұрын
roots inhibits IAA, so the side where there is no IAA grows, grows away from the sunlight
@SalsaKingoftheApes3 жыл бұрын
I agree, a small error.
@donmalik88883 жыл бұрын
Auxin always moves away from a light source so your diagram at 1:47 would not be correct. The difference between auxin action in the sh0ot and roots is that in the shoots it stimulates growth and in the roots inhibits growth.
@anastaziecupidon4363 Жыл бұрын
Hi .....may i know why auxin moves away from light? Please!
@guilhermepaixao8264 жыл бұрын
The best biology channel. I'm a brazilian student and I'm getting ready to do one important exam called ENEM. That's the best way to get into the university in Brazil and of course all those classes are helping me a lot.
@gingesauce3 жыл бұрын
2:10 the IAA should be on the shaded side.
@japhethloyd5165 жыл бұрын
Thanks, your video was perfect.
@tomasobrien87622 жыл бұрын
How do u know weather IAA encourages or inhibits cell elongation??
@nickcoates17674 жыл бұрын
Interesting but there are a couple of hand-wavy bits. You say the light "causes the auxin to move to the opposite side" but there is no explanation of the mechanism of this. I have looked at a number of presentations and papers and none have explained this. I wondered if the IAA on the lit side was destroyed by the light or is there another light sensitive process which restricts its production in the tip or flow? Also although thinking of gravity as pulling the auxin down might be a good way to remember it, I am pretty sure that is not how it works. After all if the IAA is a solute in plant sap which is mostly water and solutions do not separate out under gravity. Any thoughts on this?
@meenakshikannan59044 жыл бұрын
Protein pumps facilitate the migration of auxin to the unlit side. Different light intensities cause auxin efflux pumps to move which sets up a concentration gradient of auxin (lower conc. on the lighter side and higher conc. on the darker side). I suggest checking out this video if you're interested kzbin.info/www/bejne/rpqcn4idmqhkb5Y - he explains it quite well. Hope this helps!
@nickcoates17674 жыл бұрын
@@meenakshikannan5904 Thank you very much for your reply. I am partially satisfied but I think I suffer from being primarily a physicist, wanting to understand the whole causal chain. Your reply indicates that it is not the auxin which is photosensitive, but another process which causes it to move. That begs the question, what caused the efflux pumps to activate? I am still guessing it responds to a photosensitive chemical. I know from other sites that phototrophism responds to blue light. This explains how angiosperm trees are able to grow towards a blue-sky hole in the green woodland canopy. If you have any further insight I would be most grateful.
@meenakshikannan59044 жыл бұрын
@@nickcoates1767 Hi again! I did a quick search online for auxin transport and found this article ( www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982201004973 ). These two excerpts might help shed some light - "Light quality also has an impact on auxin transport rates. Cucumber seedlings germinated in dim-red light exhibit significantly increased auxin transport rates, indicative of a functional link between light signaling and auxin transport" and "As auxin levels are determined in part by the presence and activity of auxin efflux carriers, light might in fact change the expression and/or activity of efflux carriers in a first step towards complex light response mechanisms. In line with this model, the expression of some auxin efflux carriers is regulated by light, with both the circadian clock and the red-light receptor phytochrome A affecting transcript levels of auxin efflux carrier genes 15., 16.. If auxin efflux carriers in fact play a central role in light responses, as suggested by the model, resulting alterations in auxin homeostasis may turn on and off light-regulated target genes that are essential for the control of photomorphogenesis. According to this model, light-induced alterations of auxin efflux carrier expression and/or activity could also require DOC1/TIR3. Alterations in light regulation associated with doc1 would then be caused by changes in auxin efflux carrier expression and/or activity." Personally, I find it to be confusing but you might find it helpful!
@nickcoates17674 жыл бұрын
@@meenakshikannan5904 Thank you for your continued interest in my question. I hope you are enjoying the conversation. I have now spent some time 'geeking out' on this question. My interest in this is the possibility of making structures from naturally shaped wood. www.beamz.org.uk . what is yours? I have come to the conclusion that although the role of Auxin in phototropism is well known and characterised, the process which controls that is not fully understood even to this day. The paper below indicates the role of blue light sensitive photoreceptors, energy production through ATP and pumping processes. A look at Figure 2 will show that this is not a straightforward process www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982215003358#bib7 Thank you again for your interest. Nick
@nickcoates17674 жыл бұрын
If as I had originally assumed, the control of the auxin and therefore the direction of growth was perhaps a simple single photosensitive process, it would not have the same modulation as the complex process provides. The plant responds to blue light after being exposed for about 20 mins. It does not matter how bright the light is. Now a hardwood (Angiosperm ) sapling growing in a sunlit woodland where a hole in the canopy had recently opened up, perhaps due to another tree having fallen, would receive bright green light from the illuminated leaves in the canopy, and less bright blue light from the sky. The sapling will grow as fast as possible towards the blue-sky hole to deploy its own canopy in this space. If the sapling simpluy followed the brightest light then trees here in the Northern Hemisphere would tend to lean to the South.
@fayyazafridi19995 жыл бұрын
perfect and easy way to understand
@tiaaday66134 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for the clear animation
@AdreannaRhysand6 ай бұрын
Perfect explanation
@zoedavies39655 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!!
@kavinduharshitha44864 жыл бұрын
really a good video...thanks a lot...!!!!!!
@sarahmallon24264 жыл бұрын
Is the shaded side the stem of the plant?
@MichiKai5 жыл бұрын
Was really helpful
@faseehmorio85923 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir a lot u gave me best concept ... Love from Pakistan
@thierrytrevorbusinge81863 жыл бұрын
Top of their line stuff right here
@abcdefgh-fb5ny3 жыл бұрын
thank you for your video, it taught me a lot. I have a question though. If auxins avoid light, can you say it's negatively phototropic? My biology homework insists that I find the benefits of negative phototropism in stem shoots but I can't find anything that says stems are negatively phototropic except that one study about arabidopsis mutants. So I assume it's the auxins but is it correct tho?
@mukiibimarvin98172 жыл бұрын
I think we consider the growth of plant towards light,since the plant bends towards the stimuli (light),then we consider it positive phototropism
@mennamosaad57174 жыл бұрын
I am using this for my igcse !! Thank you
@mennamosaad57174 жыл бұрын
Till the third minute lmao
@fiddlesticks61464 жыл бұрын
you explain so well!! ty :)
@kajalgaur33624 жыл бұрын
Best explaination 😍 tq so much sir.....
@dr.rehmatullahawan44244 жыл бұрын
perfect video.
@phakamiledumile96114 жыл бұрын
thank you
@hanasalah91484 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@barigabdalla6574 жыл бұрын
Perfect
@nadveenaliiii4 жыл бұрын
Sir I would like to ask you some questions
@hemantmagwana29975 жыл бұрын
I like the vdo
@oscarvandeventer82263 жыл бұрын
My biology teacher said you’re wrong!
@thinginground51793 жыл бұрын
Damn. He summarised like 25 times lol but it was helpful anyway