PLASTUN-SN Family of All-Terrain Vehicles

Рет қаралды 15,730

Rosoboronexport

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 61

@skenzyme81 2 ай бұрын

Yes. More of these. On drone infested battlefields, this replaces light wheeled transports.

@kristijancoric3604 2 ай бұрын

This is perfect for Arctic regions and when ice start to shifts and melts going from soild surface to water.

@rotoscopia3d 2 ай бұрын

Or swampy regions.

@typhoon2643 2 ай бұрын

Toujours l'excellence de cette Grande Nation. Vive la Russie😍👍

@avb4805 2 ай бұрын

Pfff... c’est plutôt des produits DÉGUEULASSE 😂😂

@_.J._. 2 ай бұрын

Its so cute

@travisalejandro6690 Ай бұрын

Make civilians version please I really like this car❤

@bashirhasanbony6065 2 ай бұрын

Difference between this and BTR-80?

@eduardjacob8710 2 ай бұрын

Saudações do Brasil !

@KEKCAH 2 ай бұрын

Это академика вездеход?

@adrianrubi5012 2 ай бұрын

♥️❤️♥️❤️♥️❤️♥️❤️

@dainpanton4002 2 ай бұрын

5 tones 800 kg load.... 23 hp ... something is wrong there.. or this vehicle can only go downhill

@rijallalah 2 ай бұрын

Keren

@skenzyme81 2 ай бұрын

WANT

@kickmcmelon18 2 ай бұрын

How fast is reverse? 😂

@pacivalmuller9333 22 күн бұрын

Stalin said no step back, so no need for reverse.

@kickmcmelon18 21 күн бұрын

@pacivalmuller9333ah yes the all so wise advice from a man whose country collapsed

@fgiuh5413 2 ай бұрын

@НиколайЮдин-н9т 2 ай бұрын

Отправьте Чувака в Израиль ...

@badgamer7593 2 ай бұрын

First view 😊

@atharvatoskar1633 2 ай бұрын

👍

@ivanz1287 2 ай бұрын

“Open top protected armored hull…” this is not front line vehicle

@jaskong5093 2 ай бұрын

...🙄🤔 Russian Ripsaw !☺😀

@jazz.560 2 ай бұрын

I don’t understand why the Russians don’t have a heavy armoured personnel carrier like the Bradley

@LoboalphaMASTER 2 ай бұрын

The Bradley isn't heavily armoured, its a light armoured vehicle, but it can be fitted with bolts to screw in extra protection, like ERA with the "B.U.S.K" or slat armor. That however comes at the loss of soem capabilities, like being able to cross rivers. Basically, the Russians opted to maintain amphibious capabilities, while the Americans opted for more protection, that's in great part due to their experiences with the War on Terror, where the biggest threat were from ambushes and they hadn't had the need for amphibious capabilities, so they ditched them and opted for the armor instead. Another issue is that the Bradley was beuit later and with a more modular design, which means it's got ample space for extra add-ons (i mean, just look at the turrets of the modern Bradleys for example), meanwhile, the BMPs 1 and 2, which are make the bulk of the Russian IFV fleet, were made from prior to that, which makes them less capable of these improvements. The BMP-3 and BMD-4 kind of adressed that, but they weren't nearly produced as much, specially because the Russians opted to restart the BMP-2 production instead due to cost. Also, the BMP-3 and BMD-4 run into problems of their own, starting by their layout, in which the infantry disembarks over the engine, which needs to be at the back to balance the 100mm+3mm guns they have, and also, they sacrifice too much of their armor in exchange for their amphibious capability, while having their 100mm munitions spread all over the hull, making the likelyhood of a catastrophic ammo cookout more likely.

@СаняВинтарез 2 ай бұрын

@@LoboalphaMASTER для американца вы сильно разбираетесь

@LoboalphaMASTER 2 ай бұрын

@@СаняВинтарез I'm not American, i'm Brazilian.Also, thank you, i've always loved learning about machines, from military vehicles, to locomotives, planes, ships and industries, and games like World in Conflict, ArmA 3, S.T.A.L.K.E.R and others have made me develope a lot of interest for Warsaw Pact standard equipment.

@Mishn0 2 ай бұрын

Ah, another type of target available from Russia that no-one will want.

@ShettimaYasambo-y3n 2 ай бұрын

🇷🇺💗😎💪💯🙏🤲🇯🇴🇮🇶🇳🇬

@z3ronotfund939 2 ай бұрын

kedua😅

@yazermennon.UNIT22 2 ай бұрын

Slava Rossiya 🇷🇺💪🪖😎

@WinstonSmith6 2 ай бұрын

No match for a $500 drone.

@anttieskelinen1 2 ай бұрын

23HP? Joke or mistake?

@youmad7068 2 ай бұрын

106HP engine, 23HP per ton

@savagedabs8536 2 ай бұрын

My Toyota Camry can haul more weight than that!😂😂😂

@eduardjacob8710 2 ай бұрын

a sua inteligência não tem peso...😄

@Tantris773 2 ай бұрын

When did your Camry swim the last time? 😅

@savagedabs8536 2 ай бұрын

@@Tantris773Read my comment again. What am I commenting on? The weight hauling capacity, which is laughable at 800 kilo.

@savagedabs8536 2 ай бұрын

@@Tantris773Incredible that a joke sailed that far over your head. You must be a joy to hang out with.

@savagedabs8536 2 ай бұрын

@@eduardjacob8710Then I guess that Russian junk pile has the hauling capacity to handle my intelligence doesn't it? The first sign of low intelligence is attacking others intelligence.