PokerStars 200z Play & Explain with Connor

[@bagwafu]

Nice video and really good analysis. It would be good to see a video where despite sound reasoning and correct play, the board just doesnt cooperate; in this video and a recent one by Alvers both him and Connor just seemed to sun run. Nothwithstanding, Connor's thought process and actions, particularly bluffing or bluff catching, is excellent and really useful for me, grinding a slighlty lower stake with a profound lack of sun running at the moment :-) Keep it up, I appreciate the effort it goes into putting these out.

[@shivakhatore3406]

Take it easy, good luck at the tables, etc. xD

[@RageReaperf]

I dont think its necessary to zoom in on one table when only playing two, nice video though!

[@switters8679]

Necessary? Is it necessary for me to drink my own urine? No, but it's sterile and I like the taste.

[@MrBirk7]

Nice content as always. Ty

[@martinmotyka241]

lol

[@kieranroseroundnet]

The 35s all-in was a punt… no jams facing over bet on turn

[@kieranroseroundnet]

Also calling 66 vs 4bet is loosing in the long run, calling half pot on flop is also loosing, lucky you hit the 6

[@PokerWithRiske]

@@kieranroseroundnet Thanks for watching! Appreciate the feedback!

[@kieranroseroundnet]

@@PokerWithRiske ofc! Didn’t mean to come across as rude, well played overall

[@ghgf23hh3]

@@kieranroseroundnet What? You were not rude! His repond was rude, not responding anything to a critic as an ad and as a coach

[@PokerWithRiske]

@@ghgf23hh3 We are open to answering some constructive questions in the comments section. But we don't think poker coaches or content creators are obligated to provide detailed responses to comments that effectively just say "you played this hand badly". Even good players make mistakes, and this is free promotional content

[@clintonmclean9621]

🙌 pքɾօʍօʂʍ