those who are stuck at where 2Bp came from, dont forget that in the equation it is Ntotal =N1+N2. So in rate eqn if you put N1 as Ntotal-N2 and then find eqn for N2 you will get the 2 in den.
@rameshwar1272 Жыл бұрын
At 17:00 sir has taken the equilibrium condition when dN2/dt will be zero and we get the N2 at equilibrium by this formula...of course you have to use the fact N1=Ntotal-N2 in previous equation to get this form.... And you will see next that this N2 can never be greater than the N1 or half of N total that's why we can't get laser action in 2 level system
@aaqibali93496 жыл бұрын
sir if N2 =0 how spontaneous emission take place at 17:48 or how N2 = to something if it is already zero
@mm__16593 жыл бұрын
This is actually an initial condition......but what he did is that at steady state (dN2/dt=0)...and extract the value of N2 and algebraic manipulation
@corporalcharan98922 жыл бұрын
@@mm__1659 why is it in steady state?
@rameshwar1272 Жыл бұрын
@@mm__1659 did you mean the thermal equilibrium state when the rate of change will be fixed up... And thanks I'm also thinking about the extreme state or the fixed steady state.
@mahibabu67897 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture, Can you please explain how the N2/N1 equation derived by assuming the condition at time t=o, N2=0 and N1=Ntotal thank you
@aaqibali93496 жыл бұрын
same question kindly tell me if you get answered
@giancarloplazzi23645 жыл бұрын
@@aaqibali9349 when gain equals to loss , there is no emission .therefore , dN2/ dt =0 ( not N2=0)
@heenasingh93555 жыл бұрын
@@giancarloplazzi2364 but how we write 2B in denominator it must be A+Brho
@raviraturi60344 жыл бұрын
Study 1st order linear differential equation.
@jake19672 жыл бұрын
@@heenasingh9355 Before going into conditions, change N1 = Ntotal - N2. Then put dN2/dt = 0. Finally, find an expression for N2.
@alkanedust38483 жыл бұрын
What is the significance of drawing level 3 down, is it a high energy state only then why there is no 1->3 ?
@gobindachakraborty2456 жыл бұрын
You guys are doing a great job!!!I
@shideshpatil47964 жыл бұрын
Sir which book you are following?
@dr.s.esakkimuthu67414 жыл бұрын
when you explain please clearly explain the intermediate steps and their physical meaning. since in A. Ghatak they derived in different way and in B.B.Laud too.
@rohandevaki43495 жыл бұрын
how can we have a spontaneous emission and stimulated emission from 3 to 1 in a three level system
@putikibabuji14533 жыл бұрын
Sir a small doubt N2=0 then how can write again N2/N1= something
@rohandevaki43495 жыл бұрын
please provide the link your previous lecture here
@rohandevaki43495 жыл бұрын
how did u get the eqn n2=ntotalxPxB/A+2xBxP at 17:26
@crazygeek58254 жыл бұрын
Yeah dude
@ankitanain35554 жыл бұрын
N1/N2=B*rho +A/B*rho Add 1 both sides Take lcm and then again do reciprocal
@alokkumar37034 жыл бұрын
@@ankitanain3555 nice job man ,bright student
@mohamedjamal60234 жыл бұрын
@@ankitanain3555 How?
@ghanashyamutube4 жыл бұрын
@@mohamedjamal6023 Do d same as Ankita said and simply take N1+N2 as Ntotal, then u will get.
@rohandevaki43495 жыл бұрын
what is meant by dark state in a three level system at 27:35
@alenvoka23913 жыл бұрын
thank you master.
@ARCSTREAMS3 жыл бұрын
i dont understand how you proved that N2 can not be bigger than N1? all you did was say it can't?
@BlackBuzzTV3 жыл бұрын
I don't actually know if this is proper demonstration but if you consider the N2/N1 ratio to be described by the Boltzmann equation (used previously in the course) you have N2/N1=e^-X which cannot be greater than 1. This is also pretty much understable as a gain medium cannot be pumped to population inversion as when it reaches the N2=N1 ratio, it becomes transparent to that wavelength, in other words, the rate of absorption would be the same as the rate of stimulated emission.
@ARCSTREAMS3 жыл бұрын
@@BlackBuzzTV transparent to what pump wavelength? so is it still possible to get a laser beam even if n2 =n1? , i forgot what laser this was all referring to, but i get head wrapped with all this confusing stuff no matter how someone tries to explain things ,thx anyways
@BlackBuzzTV3 жыл бұрын
@@ARCSTREAMS Transparent to the N2-N1 energy related frequency (in this case both the pumping frequency and lasering frenquency as they are the same (which is the problem by the way)). In the case of a two-level LASER, one cannot reach population inversion as when the N1=N2 rate is reached, the stimulated emission phenomenon rate is equivalent to the absorption rate. Imagine this on two atoms only : if one is excited and the other one isn't, you will send a photon on it, a stimulated emission phenomenon will occur (on the excited atom), so you have two photons now, and when you reach the second atom (unexcited one) one of the two photons you have will be absorbed. The result of this is that you will have the same amount of photons (1) and the same amount of excited atoms (1).
@ARCSTREAMS3 жыл бұрын
@@BlackBuzzTV ok i understood the two atoms example for a 2 level but still not getting the transparent thing ,you said botht he pump and and simulating freq(ie wavelenght) are the same and this is a problem,can you please give an example of why or did you do this already lol? also i always thought that the pump freq is always different that the lasing freq and that the pump will have more energy than the lasing being created so for example your pump is 808nm and lasing is 1064nm ,well the 1064 can only stimulate exited electrons and can not pump them (ie absoprtion then spontaneous emission of 1064) ,are you saying i can use the same freq to pump as that of the lasing being created? so i can use for example 1064 pump to create 1064 lasing? or are there other examples where this happens?
@karansharma68355 жыл бұрын
is this in syllabusof 1st year. Please answer this