Porsche Boxster - ACCELERATION Battle - (986 vs 987 vs 981 vs 718)

[@robinkamolz1311]

I have the 986s and need 5,7 seconds from 0-100. It feels amazing in a 20 years old car.

[@Nick_NI26]

First gen sounds amazing!!!

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

Totally agree 🔥🔥

[@Granny_Gaming]

i have never seen someone make the short form of seconds be sek

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

Mistook it with Swedish money haha

[@JJ-yi1xv]

we need the s version

[@ytcine1742]

Boxster sounds as good as a 911

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

True !

[@lololebo1083]

Yes, except the 718 with 4 cylinders...

[@ytcine1742]

@@lololebo1083 yes ,it dont sound that bad, but that's not incredible

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

I really hope you enjoyed the video ! Let me know what you think of the board sumary at the end ! I take any request for videos !

[@jhreaside]

718. Not an ounce of the classic flat-6 left in that engine. Travesty.

[@paoloionni4747]

Miss the 987.2

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

I hesitated to put it in, but I didn't find a video that was good enough so I didn't put it since there already was the phase 1 even tho that's not the same engine in the phase 2

[@frgaming568]

Good video !

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

Thank you mate 🔥🔥

[@scottsmith7337]

981 sounds the best

[@dimsanmedia2556]

Its also sounds like Rb26 without turbo

[@Janawhitej1]

Finally someone knows there taste and sound of cars I couldn't agree with you more best sounding ❤

[@GethinJames]

6k launch on the 718 turbo?! That's bonkers.

[@JonWhitworth]

It might have the edge on times, but the latest Boxster doesn’t have anywhere near the great sound that the flat 6 engines can produce.

[@zoiberg]

what about the steering, cornering and braking? lap times?

[@willboastrum4701]

Hey! could you do an all generation mustang acceleration?

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

That's a very good idea ! I don't know if I'll be able to find every generation but I'll try to find as many as possible !

[@willboastrum4701]

@@carsaccelerationstv484 thanks man! I have a couple vids I can tag you in for 99-04 gt if you’d like :).

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

@@willboastrum4701 That would be really helpful ! 😀

[@willboastrum4701]

@@carsaccelerationstv484 hey I just tagged you in one please let me know if you got the notification :)

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

@@willboastrum4701 I'll see into it !

[@Bon-mz5kb]

The 718 can do 4.7s with the sc package. I myself did a 4.2s in my 718 boxster 2.0L with PDK

[@original2758]

Should have featured the 3.2 liter, 6 speed 986 Boxster S imo... Mine is modded with a Fabspeed Maxflo exhaust, Evolve CAI, IPD Plenum/TB, catless headers, Numeric shifter etc. And it sounds absolutely vicious in comparison to everything in this video... Next step is the Fabspeed "Spec Boxster racing" exhaust and that 'should' completely satisfy my desire for constant flat 6 music at its finest 😂

[@Lada-cq2lr]

718 is also named as type 982

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

I didn't know that, thanks for the info 🔥

[@Lada-cq2lr]

@@carsaccelerationstv484 You're welcome, keep it up those videos

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

@@Lada-cq2lr Thank you very much !😄

[@xstingrayx]

Yes. In fact for the line "986->987-> 981" 982 would be the correct use. Because "718" was introduced as a n attachement to the name (like panamera, macan, cayenne) not for the generation code. the official name is "718 cayman" as used with the 911s in "911 carrera" or "911 turbo". so you are very correct sir.

[@RobertSmith-bh5cv]

To me the 981 narrowly beats the 987, just because it revs a little faster and is slightly more aggressive. 718 might be faster but it sounds like ass.

[@Zsword92]

Please do Cayman

[@derekcohen1000]

Based on these results, a 2001 986 Boxster S will beat out a 981

[@ESKATEUK]

Have driven in both, a manual 260bhp 986 S would be similar performance to a 981 non S, but you’d need absolutely perfect launch and gear changes. The auto however on the 986 s is atrocious and adds pretty much a second onto the 0-60 time, and would not even be close.

[@derekcohen1000]

@@ESKATEUK I have a manual 986S. 0-60 rated 5.5 seconds.

[@Janawhitej1]

​@@derekcohen1000 I'll take a 981 over that

[@Janawhitej1]

​@@derekcohen1000 I kept up with a 986S In a 10K E90 272HP BMW 330i 3l N/A straight 😅

[@ronburgundy4375]

Your numbers have been off for quite a while the 718 came out some years ago the only thing nee for 2022 is the 718 gt4rs. And the last one you used the 2.5 for the 718 at least keep it consistent by showing the same motor type

[@carsaccelerationstv484]

Thank you for the feedback ! I'm sorry if the numbers are confusing, I do not display dates when the car is release but the year of the car I'm showing. Regarding the last one, I thought I used the 2.0 litters while doing my research but maybe I took the wrong one, I'll see more into it and if I'm wrong then I'll try to correct it ! Edit : I just went to check the video I used for the 718, and it really says that it is the 2.0 300hp 718. So maybe it's a mistake from him. Regarding being consistent by showing the same moter type, I displayed here the base model boxster in all generations. The 2.7 for the 986, 987, 981 et the 2.0 for the 718. I didn't want some boxster S in here.

[@Rockit181]

@@carsaccelerationstv484 You did it correctly for all base Boxsters. Base 718 is a 2.0T

[@lolowong439]

Mate. 718 S would do 4.3 hands down. This is not a 718 S.