Benjamin Britten - String Quartet No. 3, Op. 94

Benjamin Britten (1913 - 1976) - String Quartet No. 3, Op. 94 (1975)
I. Duets. With moderate movement [0:00]
II. Ostinato. Very fast [5:46]
III. Solo. Very calm [9:00]
IV. Burlesque. Fast - con fuoco [14:41]
V. Recitative and Passacaglia (La Serenissima). Slow [17:01]
Maggini Quartet (1999)
String Quartet No. 3, Op. 94 was Benjamin Britten's final completed major work and his last completed instrumental composition. It is a five-movement work in arch form, typically lasting around 26 minutes.
"When Britten was recovering from his 1973 heart operation, he complained that he experienced extreme discomfort in stretching up to reach the upper staves of a full orchestral manuscript. Hans Keller, for whom Britten had many years earlier promised to compose another string quartet, quipped that perhaps now was the right time to be thinking about returning to chamber music. Britten took up the suggestion, embarking wholeheartedly on his String Quartet No 3 in October 1975 and completing the composition draft in Venice the same November. Work on the score proved to be exceptionally tiring, and Britten employed the young composer Colin Matthews as an amanuensis and personal assistant: Matthews would play through Britten’s sketches on the piano, with the composer himself adding the ground bass in the final passacaglia movement. The work was intended for the Amadeus Quartet, who gave Britten a private hearing of it in Aldeburgh on 28 September 1976, but by this point the composer’s health had deteriorated so seriously that he was unable to listen for more than twenty minutes at a stretch, and needed to take frequent rests. Britten did not live to hear a public performance of his last quartet: it was premiered by the Amadeus at Snape Maltings on 19 December, just over a fortnight after his death.
Because the work comprises five fairly short movements, some commentators have regarded the Third Quartet more as a suite rather than as a cogently constructed musical argument. Indeed, Britten’s working title for the piece was ‘Divertimento’, which clearly suggests an initially lightweight conception, and it is plausible to argue that the work constitutes a significant departure from the principles of sonata form which had, however heavily disguised, dominated all his earlier instrumental music. The brunt of the intellectual substance is borne by the two outer movements, which form a frame to the three intermezzo-like central movements (two scherzos flanking a slow movement). The overall plan of the quartet is thus a simple arch pattern, again recalling the seminal influence of Bartók. Keller declared:
'The height of Britten’s own symphonic thought is reached, without question, in his Third String Quartet which, composed thirty years after his second, consummates what the earlier … work had foreshadowed, not only in terms of human drama made purely musical, but also in venturing, whole mindedly, that decisive step beyond-into the Mozartian realm of the instrumental purification of opera.'
Britten’s Third Quartet is specifically related to his last opera, Death in Venice (composed in 1970-73), several quotations from which appear in the fifth movement: the subtitle ‘La Serenissima’ refers to Venice, the city in which the movement was composed. In the course of the Recitative, Britten includes the barcarolle used to depict the motions of gondolas in the opera in addition to material relating to the unrequited love of the writer Gustav von Aschenbach for the beautiful Polish boy Tadzio, and the haunting Passacaglia is set firmly in the key of E major-the tonality used in the opera to characterize Aschenbach himself. It seems likely, however, that the quartet’s programmatic finale was intended not as a further exploration of the operatic character and his predicament, but as a poignant envoi to Pears, who had created the role on the stage and who had been Britten’s partner and creative muse for the best part of four decades. Pears described the quartet in a letter written a few days after its posthumous premiere as being ‘of a profound beauty more touching than anything else, radiant, wise, new, mysterious-overwhelming’."
(sources: Wikipedia, AllMusic, www.hyperion-r...)
Original audio: • Benjamin Britten Strin...

[@SeaweedBeastboy]

Ling Ling checkpoint! 🎻​

[@martynasmatutis8284]

I find that everything Britten wrote starting with Death in Venice until the end of his life is pretty incredible; there's a pervasive darkness, but he also seems to reclaim his creative voice, because he knows that death is coming and he *needs* to get everything on paper before it's too late.

[@sabrinai]

Shoutout to Twoset for recommending this epic piece.

[@rogernichols1124]

Here is Britten stretching the medium to its extremities, where tonality is subservient to a quest for sounds that are almost beyond the scope of the individual instruments. In the same way in which Beethoven was striving in his last quartets to express what might ve beyond expressive, Britten here is testing the medium and entering a sound world so personal to him that we can only enter it by letting go and trying to grasp his vision. I realise as I type these words that I risk sounding rhetorical or pretentious (or both) but I too am at the very edge of what language can do to convey what only music can. Obviously, this quartet is masterpiece and is a fitting swansong to one of Europe's greatest composers.

[@fransmeersman2334]

Great comment !

[@hellbooks3024]

Thanks for clearing that up. Very helpful indeed.

[@remomazzetti8757]

One of Britten's true masterworks.

[@juliee593]

That one theme right at the start of the second movement... OMFG I get an eargasm every time

[@hellbooks3024]

Any discharge?

[@nguyenvpicipmu]

Thanks to Twoset. I'll enjoy this tonight!

[@stueystuey1962]

Good stuff. Now back to my regularly scheduled programming which now leans toward post WWII compositions.

[@bernabefernandeztouceda7315]

Didn't expect to find you on a Benjamin Britten video 😂

[@SPscorevideos]

Thanks! Your channel is great!

[@kniazigor2276]

Une oeuvre vraiment extraordinaire, et magnifiquement interprétée !

[@emilewoolf863]

agreed

[@tronjensen4870]

Great work. As late as 1972 when Britten was composing Death in Venice he felt he still hadn't found the simplicity he always had been searching for. Well, he found it, which this quartett proves. A simplicity which includes complexity. PS: Doesn't he quote Ravel's "Menuet Antique" at 23.15?

[@philippelepage1609]

23:15 indeed !

[@windlesSpice]

Iaian McGilchrist brought me here.

[@allegroconfuoco6]

better than brahms

[@paulfreeman4900]

Too much Bartok to be considered great.But it's still good

[@kgroveringer03]

Never too much Bartok

[@johnrandolph6121]

I don't really hear Bartok that much honestly. I hear much more a Shostakovich influence, which doesn't bother me in the least.

[@hellbooks3024]

Perhaps some astute musical surgeon could carefully and gingerly remove the bartok elements and leave the corpus intact and alive. You might be just the person to accomplish this, with your exquisitely rarified sensibilities. We salute your heroic quest: music, and humanity, will thank you!