It saddens me that we students pay thousands of dollars for tuition yet rely on Professor Dave to explain stuff so easy and precise which somehow our professors cannot do.
@ProfessorDaveExplains8 жыл бұрын
+musclepharmbrahh damn straight, i'll take the money!
@brittniep92195 жыл бұрын
I actually have a fantastic professor but we looked at this awhile ago and I need to see stuff about one dozen times in ochem before it kinda sticks and professor Dave Explains is great!
@brittniep92195 жыл бұрын
Alfredo Fatale professor Dave I believe has a PhD... he isn’t self-taught... it’s hard to prove that you have sufficient background knowledge in a field without easily accessible grades or tests to prove it. As wonderful as KZbin is, I HAVE been led astray by people without sufficient skills and knowledge. Formal education has benefits, it’s just the way it’s taught that can be very problematic. I have had mostly awesome professors in my experience, the college can also be the problem. I did stem at CC, and then masters at a UC. I did an undergrad degree in Anthro and that department was awesome, also at a UC. But my departments are small... I never had classes over 40 students but once.
@boobella8995 жыл бұрын
Brittnie P Very well said.
@issakaiddrisu87752 жыл бұрын
The thing is that at the tertiary level, Professors don’t really teach, they lecture, so once they introduce you to the topic, it’s the students’ duty to get enough knowledge of the topic from different sources. The lecturer wouldn’t teach you to your fullest understanding, you’ll have to do some digging up and understand the concept better. And as for the tuition fee it’s actually not for the tuition, which is sad. It’s for your certificate and the exams you’ll be writing.
@juliekring75748 жыл бұрын
Teach me, O-Chem Jesus. It's late and I might be dying.
@GracieJohnston5 жыл бұрын
Thank you from the bottom of my heart for putting up all these SUUUPER helpful videos. I understand so much more because of you, and am feeling inspired by chemistry instead of dreading it!!!
@ProfessorDaveExplains5 жыл бұрын
My pleasure! I want everyone to love molecules.
@abhishupanghal51367 ай бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplainsgood to see you reply even after 5 years of making video but will you reply after 9 years?
@ryangibson6097 жыл бұрын
thanks dad
@ganapathibhat53604 жыл бұрын
Dad...😀😀😀
@soumyasucharitasahu61174 жыл бұрын
Dad 😮😮
@SahandBrizi4 жыл бұрын
Sus
@shintaayam8 жыл бұрын
How come i just found your channel??? You're giving so much useful information, and i just subbed:)
@danielbronson90666 жыл бұрын
Dave, I'm a poor college student. But I just bought a sticker in solidarity with you and your channel. I really appreciate your videos.
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
thanks for the support!
@inespereira97803 жыл бұрын
Dude... You brought my passion for chemistry back THANK YOU
@tshepisomatshidiso19587 жыл бұрын
Your videos are short and easily understandable. You save time! Ola Ola Professor Dave.
@jcurvebusiness80853 жыл бұрын
In which class do you read??
@AbdelrhmanElsayed2 жыл бұрын
loved how you connected all topics around halogenation of alkanes I studied in 4 separate subjects! ♥
@shayanakhavan60028 жыл бұрын
Dude, you're awesome!
@Mistgabel8 жыл бұрын
very straightforward and really good explained as always thank you ! Maybe you could have said something about the stability of phenylradicals compared to benzylradicals ..
@purplepickleman61729 жыл бұрын
One of the most useful videos on this!
@abdmajid77288 жыл бұрын
thanks alot ! ur videos are helping me to go through exams !!
@modelaircraft128 жыл бұрын
beautiful!! simply beautiful!
@Yankeesftw238 жыл бұрын
Great video man
@tibyanabdu84405 жыл бұрын
Oh I finally found a video that explains what I didn't understand in the lecture 💛💛💛thank you
@sccm1006 жыл бұрын
Once again, thanks man!
@jeffreycuellar24117 күн бұрын
I wish it was this easy when I took O Chem, I & II
@stevensonjack16293 жыл бұрын
thanks professor dave for your simple and understandable explaination!!!!!
@yosefahmed23703 жыл бұрын
i just love you man
@hudaquadri87922 жыл бұрын
Very nice sir this is fantastic 👌👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@JMSouchak8 жыл бұрын
Where's your little intro song? :(
@ProfessorDaveExplains8 жыл бұрын
+Joseph Souchak ohhhh it's in almost all the other clips!
@JMSouchak8 жыл бұрын
+Professor Dave Explains I know! It's great and so are all your videos! it's just a travesty that there's no jingle I was waiting for it the entire video!
@Indrarakesh8 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave Explains good 1
@burntoutelectronics3 жыл бұрын
So how would you both get high yields of and concentrate the carbon tetrachloride halogen?
@nallathambynallarajah73854 жыл бұрын
Thanķs prof. Clear explanation.on radical mech.
@sanikagawande43474 жыл бұрын
Please make a video explaining rearangment in freeradical mechanisms im having a really hard time rearranging the molecules
@NewWesternFront2 жыл бұрын
How does your explanation of the different yield ratios relate to Hammond’s Postulate?
@Sarahh_5 жыл бұрын
so we don't have to have a halogen + heat to have this reaction occur? It can occur without heat?? I've been taught that it needs heat to occur this entire time and I have the DAT exam in 2 weeks :( please reply and save my score
@sebastianhoesing17494 жыл бұрын
Did you pass?
@Sarahh_4 жыл бұрын
@@sebastianhoesing1749 haha yes I did thank you ! - hardest exam I took thus far
@sebastianhoesing17494 жыл бұрын
Congrats !!👍
@neerumahajan57046 жыл бұрын
Can chlorination of methane can take place in dark ???
@gebeyehuyiketel84969 ай бұрын
Thanks so much
@DevanshDixit-h6h3 ай бұрын
Can methyl shift happen in free radical halogenation of neopentane
@toufick3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir.
@growwithbts30385 жыл бұрын
I have an doubt, in initiation step chlorine is devided into two free radicals but why we use only one free radical in first step and then use the 2 chlorine radical in other steps?😰
@ProfessorDaveExplains5 жыл бұрын
well only one radical is needed, the other will go and react elsewhere
@tylerforbeck89564 жыл бұрын
omg I haven't seen you since phsyics
@faisalabdullah79623 жыл бұрын
Do alkene and alkyne can change into radicals ?
@jonathanlalrintluanga47372 жыл бұрын
Why do radical of F is more reactive than other halogen?
@ProfessorDaveExplains2 жыл бұрын
because it's smaller
@maylinisabella_4 жыл бұрын
can you explain your tattoo? i always pause the video to look at it haha i'm curious as to what it is/means
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
check out "ask professor dave #3"
@ceciliaalicona17046 жыл бұрын
if theres a different hydrocarbon molecule let's say methylcyclopentate, would the radical target the tertiary hydrogen or one of the hydrogen in the primary methyl carbon? other than that question I understand everything else. Thank you so much for your help.
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
depends on the reactivity of the radical, chlorine will be less selective than bromine for example, but leaving the tertiary alkyl radical intermediate will always be more thermodynamically favorable.
@ceciliaalicona17046 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave Explains so with carbon, both the tertiary and the primary would be substituted. If it were bromine, would it mostly go towards the tertiary?
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
you mean chlorine? yeah chlorine just goes everywhere, so you'll get a mixture of products. bromine would go almost exclusively to the tertiary position.
@ceciliaalicona17046 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave Explains yes that’s what I meant! Okay thanks! I get it!
@hannahmorgan97825 жыл бұрын
Maybe I missed it but did you show how to get the yields
@ProfessorDaveExplains5 жыл бұрын
pretty tough to predict, you would just do the reaction and observe
@tariqhussain86816 жыл бұрын
clear concept
@nihalrazak98097 жыл бұрын
thanks prof
@rajnarayanchowdhury58247 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave in chlorination how do we know which one is the major product??
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
depends on the substrate, you'll definitely get a mixture as chlorination is not very regioselective
@rajnarayanchowdhury58247 жыл бұрын
Sir i have got a question that is chlorination of 2 methyl propane by free radical mechanism...i have to predict the major among the two2 chloro propane and one chloro propane
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
so that will be the primary chloroalkane, because there are three identical methyl groups, so it's three times as likely that it'll end up on a primary carbon than the tertiary one, statistically speaking, and there is only a slight push towards tertiary thermodynamically, so there'll be at least twice as much primary product as tertiary.
@rajnarayanchowdhury58247 жыл бұрын
Sir i cant understand the reason...can u explain it more clearly?? Can we use hyperconjugation concept??
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
everything i would say is in this clip! just watch again.
@vasanthisuperkaruna34073 жыл бұрын
YES SIR
@mohitrao6594 жыл бұрын
Sir can you please take illustratuons from JEE ADVANCED for your videos. It would simply be awesome.
@swegattyswooty93076 жыл бұрын
00:00
@rittenbrake16136 жыл бұрын
GREEEAAAAAAAATTTTTT
@amangairola183 жыл бұрын
From india 💜
@AmitKumar-rf3hr7 жыл бұрын
what's that tattoo .??? Looks great .!!
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
Parsec!
@عبّدِالُمٌجْيَدِالُدِحُمٌ-ب5ج3 жыл бұрын
انا من اليمن جزاك الله الف خير شرح جدا حلو
@jcurvebusiness80853 жыл бұрын
Hi I am from India .
@sinaabedini74874 жыл бұрын
Chem jesus
@karishma6066 жыл бұрын
Yo bless you
@akshatsharma73808 жыл бұрын
are you an Indian?. Because you like an Indian
@ProfessorDaveExplains8 жыл бұрын
nope, italian!
@Imubozuu8 жыл бұрын
He looks nothing like an Indian.
@abdmajid77288 жыл бұрын
i thought you andrea pirlo in first place , anyway forza juve sir hahaha
@jollyjokress38526 жыл бұрын
You are all biased because every second scientific video is made by an Indian ;) btw, he totally looks part Italian or at least being from the Mediterranean area ;)
@z0699z4 жыл бұрын
TF is he talking about someone give me the summary ;;;;;((((
@abhinavrao16037 жыл бұрын
are you Indian??
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
nope, italian!
@abhinavrao16037 жыл бұрын
sir your videos are really nice. keep it up. Hail the Italy. Thanx for the video.