The Artemis Program: NASA's Mission To Return To The Moon | Zenith | Progress

Join us on a journey through NASA's Artemis program, set to return astronauts to the Moon. Discover how partnerships with private companies like Boeing and SpaceX are reshaping space travel, with plans for space tourism and cutting-edge technology.
00:00 SpaceX Projects
11:55 Dream Chaser
14:30 Artemis
24:58 Virgin Galactic
25:54 The Earth’s Creation
34:33 Climate Change
51:12 Space Communication
52:23 Sputnik I
59:30 Intelsat I
01:04:35 Space Debris
01:05:35 Starlink
01:11:03 Deep Space Communication
Welcome to Progress -- the home of history's greatest leaps forward. From the seismic invention of the world's first printing press to the great rocket-powered marvels that took us to the stars, we'll be bringing you world-class documentaries celebrating history's greatest inventions and technological breakthroughs.
Discover the past on History Hit, with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly and presented by world-renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code 'PROGRESS': historyhit.com/subscription
Progress is part of the History Hit Network.
#progress #documentary #technology

[@Mike-tq7nz]

We need to get our s*** together. So we are the first people to get back on the moon first again..... Start picking up the best real estate .

[@mariuskoen1]

2024? That's this year, we almost half way through it, thought people would talk about landing on the moon more

[@Artist452]

This is all old news. 7 days ago?

[@MrSimonw58]

Boeing going to orbit

[@franciscocontreras4450]

Lol... I read this wrong,... I read something in the lines of "Our Return From The Moon" and then I seen at the bottom of the video information that KZbin provides that it was posted 6 days ago. Oh I forgot to mention with the new SpaceX Rocket. 🚀

[@albertorozco5981]

Why not go and get the space shuttle back and reverse engineer it and get it ready for space flight. Maybe some museum space capsules also.

[@soldaat001]

Why not? Dude🤔 why would you need the STS? We move forward and ONLY forward, it's a oneway street⛔️🇺🇲💪🚀🇺🇲🥰🌔🪐🌌🫡

[@tonynoaa3950]

Yes that's what I said .if it can be done ? Then fly it to the moon .🚀☠☠☠

[@Kurzula5150]

I'm no fan of Russia right now, but I don't think Russia has a 'strangle hold' on spaceflight. They just chanced upon the novel idea of "design a reliable system that works, and keep making it".

[@edfleming9600]

Why do you hacks steal real stuff? I'll give you a full watch because I need sleep.

[@ST-cx9bt]

They can’t do it. People are much dumber now.

[@georgehollingsworth2428]

Artimis 3, the first lunar landing of humans since Apollo 17, has now been rescheduled for 2026. In 2025 Artemis 2 is scheduled to orbit the moon with a human crew without landing and return to earth.

[@james-le2rs]

I wonder if somebody's stalling I wonder if they keep coming up with excuses because there's something they don't want us to know how could they have to need more time after 50 years

[@David-lq4tq]

No human has ever gone higher than low earth orbit. It will never happen.

[@antaxiczombie]

I genuinely want to understand your point of view. What makes you believe that?

[@David-lq4tq]

@@antaxiczombie NASA admits we can’t go higher than that now. They expect us to believe they did it 50 years ago with the technology of a toddlers toy, then lost all the data, all 11 missions. They also claim they can’t replicate the process. This is an absurd story. There are many more problems with the alleged space program.

[@albertorozco5981]

Made in china valve 😂😂😂

[@rezzer7918]

I doubt it 🙄

[@privatesector0422]

The stop motion animation puppet is pretty freaking funny 😂... And they expect us to believe cartoons LOL

[@jonathanchester5916]

You know the moon is not on earth right? That's as far as the Artemis program has taken humans. Great job!

[@soldaat001]

Were did Atermis 1 go Jonathanchester?🇺🇲🦅🫡

[@ValentineArkly-rz6rs]

If it is true.why not going again. For years????great question//////???

[@LastRaceBender]

Better hurry 2024 half over 🤔🤔🙄🙄

[@grahamstevenson1740]

Well that aged well. Virgin's pretty much out of the space business.

[@IslandUncharted]

We have never been to the moon

[@antonybarnstormer6285]

We never went to the moon in the first place NASA = Never a straight answer.

[@antaxiczombie]

Might sound crazy to your bolstered ego and tiny brain, but there are people who are A LOT smarter than you in this world. WOAH! Crazy right?? Or maybe I'm wrong. How long have you been an Astrophysicist or a rocket scientist? Please let me know. I'm very anxious to hear all of your very smart opinions and very factual claims 😄

[@albertorozco5981]

They will carry 4 to 7 souls 😢

[@user-jd1kc9xw1x]

Science aside… Anybody else see this (privatizing near earth orbits) as a feeble attempt to justify the wealth gap?

[@albertorozco5981]

It only clarifies how NASA scientists are no longer able to create and build as cheap as these companies. There not paying millions for toilets. They still have comtrol. Its cheaper to privatize.

[@dl2839]

No

[@soldaat001]

@user-jd1kc9xw1x, just you son👌 just you 🙏🇺🇲🦅🫡

[@ChristianIssac-gq5zu]

I wouldn't say low earth orbis is privatized, its become a monopoly and if you have the money/resources to exploited that monopoly why shouldn't you.

[@Eigil_Skovgaard]

Not 'return' - try to get there for the first time without cheating.

[@seabee2653]

The American Taxpayer always wins. Let’s goo!

[@paulbriggs3072]

Warning-this goes for about one third of the video on space technology, and then switches to climate change doctrine.

[@alisturkericmacnanty159]

So did all this actually happen, or was it all just creative, wishful thinking...

[@justinjay6930]

return ...haha first you got to get there to return

[@albertorozco5981]

Deadlines = disasters 😒😒😒

[@mnblkjh6757]

🤣😂

[@mewintle]

Wow, that aged badly

[@Kda2456]

Why? Did we leave something there that can't be replaced! Don't get this at all!!

[@Me-zx7kk]

Return to the place they ve never been to

[@rodneymorgan313]

Waste of money

[@tonynoaa3950]

Nobody has been to the moon.

[@jonathanchester5916]

not true Elvis has.

[@stevennelson2055]

I went last week, was a great trip!

[@waynerm401]

Lol

[@tonynoaa3950]

@@waynerm401 🤡🚀☠☠🚀

[@bradjones5107]

Return? We never went! We still haven't found out how to pass through the Van Allen Belt without being fried.

[@reb2322]

Absolutely CORRECT!.......but they'll never admit it! If the spacesuits they SAY they used in 1969 worked, then why is it taking so long to develop one now? Why not use the originals?

[@carcinogen60yearsago]

pea brain

[@joeker1013]

Are you an expert on radiation? Can you tell the difference between Alpha, Beta, and Gamma? Did you know the Van Allen belts are very thin near the north and south pole? And since it was NASA that informed you about the Van Allen belts, why would they do that if they knew they were going to have to fly through them? You conspiracy nuts know a couple sentences of science and think you know everything. You're too lazy to find out anything that might disprove your preconceived notions. You think you know something THEY don't and that makes you special. If you actually did know something how long do you think you'd live before you were another dead body of a nobody?

[@raving_1074]

Cant tell if yall trolling or just dumb

[@drko88]

Because they are creating a more functional now, the missions in the 60s were just to stay a short time In the moon they are now trying to create a base there. It's not that hard to understand. I'm not even going to waste my time trying to explain why it was not possible to fake the moon landings in the late 60s keep living in your conspiracy world

[@stevemayes50]

So you’re just going to ignore Starship? 😂

[@ericanderson3453]

For this video YES! Is that okay with you?!??

[@stevemayes50]

$2 billion per launch SLS. What a joke

[@user-sl9rc6ve6k]

2024😂😂😂😂😂maby 2042.Return😂😂😂😂,thay have never been at the Moon.

[@CathodeRayNipplez]

What a faff of taxpayer bs. 🙄