cases such as bruton are quite rare......however, i would add that the courts were reluctant to come to that conclusion and was rather a common-sense decision. The COA thought it to be a licence because otherwise it would result on an assault on the principles of a lease laid down in Street..... btw it wasn't a quite clever way to escape the ambit of a lease ...the london quadrant felt it could not grant a lease from its licence because in doing so it might overstep its boundaries (cannot give what you dont have)........A good case to use however, on why the distinction between lease and license has been blurred
@kristianmatthias14697 жыл бұрын
haha , youve got exams in may too . Good Luck
@HpcShadow7 жыл бұрын
Haah ill need it ....same to you !
@onisimionut9220 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video? Do you alsp cover periodic tenancies ?
@TheLawSimplified Жыл бұрын
Hi Onisim. Yes, it's part of the comprehensive Masterclass. Have a look: *go.thelawsimplified.com/MasterclassPropertyComplete*
@kibrisliboy20136 жыл бұрын
Hi mate, are you still student or graduated? Thanks for the videos
@TheLawSimplified6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment Barbarossa. I graduated from the University of London a few years ago.
@francispowell18115 жыл бұрын
Street v Mountford was a 180 deg turn from Somma v Hazelhurst.
@danielfinch3624 жыл бұрын
Yes because as Lord Templeman said. You cannot ignore the reality of the situation. If the words in the contract indicate the creation of a licence but the reality of the situation was one of exclusive possession then it would in fact create a lease. The reasoning for this decision was because as Templeman said 'of landlords were simply allowed to contract out a lease, then landlords would simply run coach and horses through the Rent act 1977. Quite simply this set a precident that no one can contract out of taking away someone's statutory rights. This has also been used in Employment law in the case of Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher the workers were deemed employees not self-employed contractors and the Street V Mountford case was used in its reasoning. Employers often say workers are self employed to get out of paying holiday pay and other such legal and financial responsibilities.
@sarpanchsaab55635 жыл бұрын
Do in hindhi also sir plzzz
@farhannizar38588 жыл бұрын
Is it the same as Landlord and Tenant?
@danielfinch3624 жыл бұрын
A tenancy and lease is the same thing. Tenancy is now used in replacement of Lease.
@user-uf3tp4sz4m3 жыл бұрын
Что он сказал, непонятно
@mserpico884 жыл бұрын
I was not aware Kumail nanjiani made a career in Law.