That's why germany lost the second world war... there were no musicians...
@nattygsbord7 жыл бұрын
Well, not every country have their military music written by Beethoven, Haydn and other great masters... kzbin.info/www/bejne/oZ-xg6FjYtutgK8 kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnnddKx4nNOkkJY
@egoshOOter147 жыл бұрын
Naturally^^
@0utc4st19857 жыл бұрын
No no no, it was not having the tall grenadier hats that did it.....
@insertnamehere0017 жыл бұрын
Cow-bells are the crux of any good infantry fighting force. Any infantry fighting without them is doomed to lose.
@smokyondagrass23537 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d6i6ZGSra9yMrKc the MG-42 was their instrument and the red communists were their audience.
@oliviastratton70977 жыл бұрын
Frederick the Great was awesome. I've heard some military historians say that when you factor in the size of his army vs the size of his opponents' armies, he may have been a greater military commander than Alexander the Great. His tactics were really innovative, he was a Renaissance Man who could play the flute and appreciated the arts, and he overcame a pretty abusive childhood to get there. Very impressive. He needs a good biopic.
@Nazdreg14 жыл бұрын
Frederick was an interesting guy and I think he was one of the most grounded monarchs that ever lived. “A crown is merely a hat that lets the rain in.” and "I am the first servant of my state" are pretty typical statements. This levelheadedness towards himself legitimised him as a pretty radical meritocrat who mostly demanded conscientiousness of his subjects over everything else.
@FlagAnthem4 жыл бұрын
He was the German Frank Underwood
@astrotecn3 жыл бұрын
@James Scoles what is awesome about being gay?
@astrotecn3 жыл бұрын
@James Scoles I am not homophobic, its just that being gay is nothing to be proud of, its just a sexual orientation, thats my point.
@lc92453 жыл бұрын
Friedrich wasn't a brilliant general, he was rather average. He wasn't even the best Hohenzollern general at the time. His brothers, Augustus was a more capable general, especially Henry who was much wiser and brilliant. However, he had something not many military leaders have, sound of mind. While he acted rashly many times, losing many battles due to his temper, at the end of the day, Friedrich always pull himself back together. It started as a child when he was severely punished by his father for his rash action, in which he pulled through and claim the throne in spite of his father's wishes. He also acknowledged his father's accomplishment, despite personal animosity. He started wars, with decent preparation, following principles he laid out which brought him initial successes, thinking he could win, got figured by his enemies, defeated, and ultimately saved by great fortune, but also his reputation as a philosopher and progressive. In spite of bitter defeat yet fortunate position after the Russian pulled out, having occupied a large part of Saxony and regained Silesia completely; instead of pushing the issue with the Austrian, when Maria Theresa proposed peace by reverting to the status quo, he agreed immediately. Napoleon would have tried to get as much as he can, ignoring the ramification of such aggression down the line. That is why his conquest remained after he died, while Napoleon's empire disappeared, despite being a much better general and a much more charismatic politician.
@l0lLorenzol0l7 жыл бұрын
137.5% DISCIPLINE BABYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY *FRIDERICUS REX BLARES AT 210 DECIBELS*
@HaloFTW557 жыл бұрын
I didn’t expect the Adeptus Mechanicus here.
@mtsoskappa61847 жыл бұрын
[partitioning Poland intensifies]
@techpriest89657 жыл бұрын
Heh.
@draconianscout7 жыл бұрын
Prussian Space Marines are the best Space Marines
@mtsoskappa61847 жыл бұрын
How bout' you chill 4/10 I was dissapointed there was no Prussian earrape :(
@fuzzydunlop79287 жыл бұрын
7:20 - The Prussian eagle is holding a Holy Hand grenade.
@useraccount3066 жыл бұрын
İt's actually an sovereign's orb symbolism of earth and a cross on top of it, supposed to represent christian hegomony on earth.
@lilboicumstain42116 жыл бұрын
User Account No, it’s a Holy Hand grenade.
@bobbemis89116 жыл бұрын
@@lilboicumstain4211 The design of the holy hand grenade was modeled after it, because let's be honest, Friedrich the Grat would have use a holy hand grenade
@Opa_der_Kranke6 жыл бұрын
This is the Holy Roman Empire of the german nation grenade. Halleluja!
@michaelm36915 жыл бұрын
I was also pleased to see the historical military symbol for cavalry used at 1:07
He's Frederick the Great. He became the first servant of the state with oblique attack tactics. He ain't exactly straight. He's got creative talents and battle malice - hard as steel on the field but genteel in the palace.
@dankcrossaint96685 жыл бұрын
i see what you did there hnghhh
@sheldon-cooper3 жыл бұрын
Russia's f*cked up but no wonder why, with their tundras and taiges and their bears.
@sheldon-cooper3 жыл бұрын
@Amey Tiwari now bring him his chair, he's wear from tearing you a new derrière from there to red square
@PineappleOnPizza695 ай бұрын
@@sheldon-cooperfought a 7 years war and ain't scared of a Czar!
@dejabu247 жыл бұрын
when Napoleon went to the tomb of Fredrick the great in 1806 , he said if you were still alive....I would not be standing here , 134 years later Hitler visited Napoleon’s tomb in paris
@dejabu247 жыл бұрын
The Legionary Romanian I wonder if it was really a coincidence
@VRichardsn7 жыл бұрын
Napoleon had those moments... Take the famous 1632 battle of Lutzen (where Gustavus Adolphus famously died) In 1814, when things were looking rather poorly, Napoleon still found time to visit the 1632 battlefield, playing tour guide with his staff by pointing to the sites and describing the events of 1632, in detail from memory, when he heard the sound of cannon. He immediately cut the tour short and rode off towards the direction of the artillery fire, to go on and win his own battle of Lutzen.
@dejabu247 жыл бұрын
oh really I guess great military leaders respect those of the past even if they were enemies at the time , hey Gustavus Adolphous was an other military leader with a legendary reputation
@VRichardsn7 жыл бұрын
_great military leaders respect those of the past_ This is specially true for Napoleon. He put great emphasis on reading and re-reading past commanders in order to build a good generalship.
@alganhar17 жыл бұрын
@ Richardson All great commanders did to be honest. If you look into accounts of all the great generals you will find that all of them avidly read the accounts of great generals before them. Even going so far back as Julius Ceaser who specifically mentioned reading accounts of Alexanders battles avidly. Alexander probably did as well :P
@irongeneral78617 жыл бұрын
*Preußens Gloria intensifies*
@generalfisch20176 жыл бұрын
you know without the earrape it wouldn't be as glorious
@stormyprawn5 жыл бұрын
*Cries in Prußen* I hope I spelt Prussia right there ^^
@Marco-bf4uu5 жыл бұрын
@@stormyprawn Wtf? He wrote it in the comment above. Preußen
@goodsous7 жыл бұрын
No-one expects the My Little Pony Cavalry
@mariuspequeno21756 жыл бұрын
Prussia probably had these
@mitamajr6 жыл бұрын
Wasn't the mlp horse also in the cavalry tactics video?
@kye63755 жыл бұрын
Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition
@rixille4 жыл бұрын
Weak cavalry, you see.
@spark55803 жыл бұрын
Yes the my little pony Cav are way more skilled than the royal guard
@scaryanarchist12607 жыл бұрын
Your style is great and simple. I like that. The subject can be understood because of clear images and voice. Great job!
@thenoobinator35087 жыл бұрын
Here's a little anecdote involving a prussian and a french soldier. Two prussian soldiers walk up to a captured french soldier. One of the prussian soldiers says "you see? The french fight only for money". The french soldier asks "and you? What do you fight for?" "For honor" the prussian say The frenchman replies "So it's true that all men fight for what they lack"
@dubsy10267 жыл бұрын
The Noobinator ayyyy
@Damo26907 жыл бұрын
The Noobinator That sassy frenchman
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
lol
@mtsoskappa61847 жыл бұрын
but the French fought for bravery ;)
@zach82697 жыл бұрын
The Noobinator wrong that quote was from Robert Surcufe a french privatere while fighting a British ship....
@3uujh6567 жыл бұрын
*sigh* time to start another Brandenburg run...
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
:D which EU?
@robertjarman37037 жыл бұрын
Like the rout of the US Army from the British who burned down the White House?
@3uujh6567 жыл бұрын
Military History Visualized EU4 of course
@mrbrainbob53206 жыл бұрын
Robert Jarman the white house was actually burnt by the US
@SkipperPlaysTW7 жыл бұрын
That Mount & Blade reference! Very interesting video, I find Prussian Military history can be used as an interesting guide on tackling certain parts of life.
@josepmariabartomeu71402 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video, very informative and interesting, glad to see channels like this on KZbin. Greetings from Tijuana , Mexico. Gracias
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@Scientist1187 жыл бұрын
Prussia, that one country that sent an officer to whip the Revolutionary Army during the American Revolution.
@antiochusiiithegreat77217 жыл бұрын
Are you talking about the Prussian officer that trained the Americans before the battle of Monmouth?
@Scientist1187 жыл бұрын
Aidan Christy Yes, that guy.
@ryankiser46397 жыл бұрын
Kamzil118 The Baron von Steuben.
@zubstep5 жыл бұрын
Baron von Steuben was great and made decisive contributions to win the war, but no, Prussia wasn't the only country to send a desperately needed officer. From France, Gilbert du Motie, the Marquise de Lafayette, left a lasting impression for valor on the field. From Poland, Casimir Pulaski became the founding father of the American Cavalry. Also from the Commonwealth, Tadeusz Kościuszko made his impact with engineering and field fortifications, most notably at West Point and Saratoga. All of these figures are commemorated in the US with various monuments and are noted in the early grade history classes.
@kyoukoumarleau76334 жыл бұрын
@@zubstep I mean I've never heard these names in elementary or middle school. Hell, I didn't even know Prussia existed until high school.
@dirt01336 жыл бұрын
Not only is your content HIGHLY informative, i really enjoy your sense of humor. :) Also, although i don't understand German, the only words i know relating to the military, i enjoy listening to you read the text first in it's original form and then with your translation. Please keep up the Great Work you do, and thank you for all the terribly interesting facts i take from your videos.
@jmgonzales7701 Жыл бұрын
i like prussian history too bad they are gone
@austenbin40687 жыл бұрын
Great timing! I have been doing some casual looking into the Seven Years War and Fredrick the Great, so this video is much appreciated .
@casparcoaster19363 жыл бұрын
Many tanx! You can imagine as an old(er) north American, how little history we learn of northern Europe in general, Prussians and Prussia in particular. The breadth of history channels has made me love KZbin late in life (I thought was just going to be another stupid form of television). My parents & grandparents were Germans & Swedes, my son married a Dane, so all things Germanic, recent and ancient, interest me. again, many thanks.
@tabasco5997 жыл бұрын
anybody else saw the mount and blade refrence
@sasanek127 жыл бұрын
It's almost harvesting season!
@reviveempires7 жыл бұрын
That's a nice head you have on your shoulders!
@hughjass51567 жыл бұрын
"like in mount and blade" Its the little touches like that that make this channel special. Love it.
@sullivannix45097 жыл бұрын
Frederick the Great was undoubtedly one of the best leaders of men of all time, if not the best, whether it was in peace or during war. He fought off France, Russia, Austria, and Sweden simultaneously, probably unrivaled in all of history. It's quite silly for some to say that his success was owed to the appointment of a pro-Prussia king. It was Frederick that never fought a battle without superiority in numbers, it was Frederick that went largely without English help, and it was Frederick that made Prussia a name that will never be forgotten.
@TheApocalypticKnight7 жыл бұрын
When Napoleon conquered Prussia and visited the grave of Frederick, he is reported to have said "If he was still alive, I would not need to be here".
@Fallout31317 жыл бұрын
I personally think Fredrick was overrated. He inherited the super disciplined organised army from this father, he often fought inferior armies both in command and troop quality. His army could be told to march forward and they basically obliterated anything upfront of them due to quality and his officer core. Not as much unimaginable tactical genius. I like the guy, he's definitely an alright leader, but I think the god complex of the Prussians he gets is over-done.
@a-drewg17166 жыл бұрын
hey nothing beats that flute busting Prussian except maybe sleep
@johansmifthelry93075 жыл бұрын
@Duchy of Mecklenburg-Schwerin i would argue that Napoleon was greater than him. Unlike Friedrich, Napoleon inherited a ruined, decimated, and sick country, utterly divided, and with a corrupt and inefficient army. Yet, he soared through the ranks out of his own genius, and single handedly fought 7 coalitions of the most powerful powers in Europe, and defeated 6 of the 7. At the same time, he fought off Prussia, Austria, England and Russia, and managed to stay on top, until his time came
@jholtzable7 жыл бұрын
I really liked this video. Living in the US and not knowing a lot of German makes finding great quality information like this kind of difficult.
@gratefulguy4130 Жыл бұрын
Living in Germany would make it 100x harder to find out anything about German/Prussian/Holy Roman Empire history.
@Kevin-pj4yd7 жыл бұрын
I was reading clausewitz so the timing is great. Also, I kinda like you quoting text in german but when it lasts too much I have trouble "picking up" the video again. But that's just my opinion
@DagarCoH7 жыл бұрын
Are you planing on doing more about the time around Frederick, other nation's militaries and significant battles?
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
yeah, but might take a while. Did a lot of reading up for this and continued.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
of course, view count is always important, but less and less so as the Patreon support is growing.
@KaiserFranzJosefI7 жыл бұрын
Military History Visualized I would suggest the Kaiserlich-Königliche Landwehr
@spenadam7 жыл бұрын
Please do, I enjoy the time period.
@BountyFlamor7 жыл бұрын
Could you make a video on early grenades. As in the grenades grenadiers used?
@MrFleem7 жыл бұрын
Strong infantry, weak cavalry. Something like classical Rome, then?
@vladdrakul78515 жыл бұрын
Yet by the Napoleonic era the Prussian Cavalry had the reputation of being amongst the very best cavalry in the world like the French Cuirassiers. And the later Eastern Rome developed the Cataphracts as the new mobile Elite legionaires when facing Eastern enemies!
@peterlynch14587 жыл бұрын
Fantastic episode! I hope you can do many more of these. Please examine the French batallions throughout the Revolutionary Wars.
@thenoobinator35087 жыл бұрын
Does every grenedier get 60 bullets?
@terminator5727 жыл бұрын
The Noobinator and his payment every week
@hussite72357 жыл бұрын
You are a great man
@Erikaaaaaaaaaaaaa7 жыл бұрын
Don't forget about General Schwerin and Field Marshal Von Keith and General Major Von Zeiten!
@yochaiwyss38437 жыл бұрын
Jen'ari-asha But are they ready to obey all commands?
@hildegard20027 жыл бұрын
Who receives his money as fast as the Prussian?
@hussite72357 жыл бұрын
Frederick the Great is probably my favorite King\General of all time save maybe Napoleon
@benaud57907 жыл бұрын
Hussite really? I think Napeleon was over rated. He never dealt woth or managed logistics but stole off the land ultimately causing his own downfall.
@oliviastratton70977 жыл бұрын
Frederick > Napoleon the Great. He was never as throughly defeated for one, so his accomplishments actually held for a long time. And considering the proportions of his army vs his enemies, and the status of his army when he came to power, his success was more impressive. He also didn't have the whole invading-russia-during-the-winter flub. Also, he was a better person and was actually a great political leader as well as a military one.
@hussite72357 жыл бұрын
Olivia Stratton I think youre forgetting that Fred was largely saved by God and Austro\Russian ignorance in the seven years war
@nattygsbord7 жыл бұрын
Frederick won many impressive victories despite he was heavily outnumbered in the battles he fought. He might have been defeated, but he would then still be remembered as a great General, a 18th century Hannibal. One could paraphrase an MHQ-article and say that battlefields of the 1700s usally was a fight between armies who dealt equally large losses to each other, and the side with more men to spare usally went off with the victory. Frederick revolutionized warfare with his bold warfare and threw the old rules of the game out the window. And he scored crushing victories against superior opponents at Hohenfriedberg, Leuthen, Rossbach and other places. But his problem was that his victories never ended up in anything decisive.
@hussite72357 жыл бұрын
nattygsbord Frederick was used to one and done wars. He underestimated the will power of Maria Theresa and the Austrians. Which is why he didn't get his decisive battle. But back to the point. Napoleon revolutionized warfare just as Frederick did. Perhaps even more, since he made cavalry relevant again.
@KillaArmadilla7 жыл бұрын
Can we get a video on the German unification, and/or the dreyse needle rifle, and/or Prussian army and equipment in the 19th century?
@ME-hm7zm7 жыл бұрын
Forgotten Weapons has a thing on the Dreyse, as memory serves.
@KillaArmadilla7 жыл бұрын
Michael Eversberg II yes they do, as well as the gewehr 71
@VRichardsn7 жыл бұрын
The Dreyse would make for a wonderful 3 minute short video. _Die Deutschen_ did a small segment on it some time ago: kzbin.info/www/bejne/roTGm56omMZ0mcU
@Janshevik6 жыл бұрын
capanball made a great video about it too
@robertfisher83596 жыл бұрын
It might have been worth mentioning that the musicians essentially were part of an 18th century signal corps, acting to pass on orders from higher commanders (a task often made difficult by the sound of musket fire). In 1940, this was replaced with modern communications such as radios and runners, hence the need for officials and musicians dropped considerably. Great video MHV!
@GeneralKenobiSIYE5 жыл бұрын
lo at the Stormtrooper icon. I remember the day well. It was the day I became more powerful than Vader could have ever imagined.
@duane86207 жыл бұрын
Great video, was interesting seeing the breakdown of Prussia's military structure. Not sure if you have done it already but I would love to see a Korean War Overview/Comparison of Tactics, military might , Challenges leading to the end result of the war. Thanks for some amazing videos, I really enjoy watching!
@cosmiclive44376 жыл бұрын
I love how much I can hear you trying to say Preußen.
@orthoff1236 жыл бұрын
Gute Arbeit! Interessanter Überblick über die Pr. Armee!
@arsenal-slr95527 жыл бұрын
Making me want to play Empire:Total War. Great Video!
@ME-hm7zm7 жыл бұрын
So much lost potential :(
@Fallout31317 жыл бұрын
Michael Eversberg II yeah
@FieldMarshalYT6 жыл бұрын
just Use Darthmod and you got the potential.
@Desintyx27 жыл бұрын
Wow. Great work, especially with the final graphics on formations.
@IllicitGreen6 жыл бұрын
excellent analysis, thank you!
@kempodle46657 жыл бұрын
The way you said “donkey” “Dainky”
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
it's in Prussian dialect
@microraptorguy13875 жыл бұрын
Excellent video, i really loved how it was made. The easy, simple and very flowing way both animations and info were made created a really enjoyable and pleasant video to watch. Now that i have a more basic knowledge of this army i can start to study more in depth. Thank you for this video and keep it up!
@qck12347 жыл бұрын
Another reason for more NCO's in the 1940 was that in the time of Fredrick the Great the formations were massive, whereas by 1940 squad level tactics were important. Large formations in 1940 would have been great targets for artillery and machineguns and would cause massive casualties, also formations were a lot more spread out to cover a larger front since battles occurred in fronts measured in miles instead of yards.
@klobiforpresident22547 жыл бұрын
If I had one part of Prussia for every gender there is Danzig would be a free state.
@thomasconnors43385 жыл бұрын
I've watched several of your videos but this is the one that made me subscribe. I appreciate the quality of the introduction, in which you explain historical political context by pointing out that two diametrically opposed modern groups (nazis and anti-nazis) BOTH claimed to be heirs to the Prussian ethos. I honestly don't know who was right (i assume everyone was a little bit wrong because...well you know they were shooting eachother's brothers) but my basic indoctrination is "Prussians are Germans, Germans are Nazis, so screw the Germans but let's be glad that Germans have good timing because Napoleon would have won if Blucher had been any later". It's interesting to know more than that now, thanks to your video.
@lightninginmyhands48785 жыл бұрын
Well done and I appreciate your reading of native languages
@Ensign_Cthulhu7 жыл бұрын
Excellent summary. 6:02 While I do not speak German, I believe you may have mistranslated Patronentasche. My experience from reading about and researching ammunition suggests that rather than "patron's bag" it should read "cartridge bag" (i.e. ammunition bag) or possibly (more loosely) "bandolier".
@schlawa7 жыл бұрын
Very cool video again. In the "Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg", they actually have drawings of full Prussian (and other, especially Hessian formations) on great (3x3 meter) maps with each single soldier represented in full marching order.
@konradvonschnitzeldorf65067 жыл бұрын
gotta love the Jäger
@yochaiwyss38437 жыл бұрын
Konrad von Schnitzeldorf Like you know anything about strategy, Schnitzeldorf...
@konradvonschnitzeldorf65067 жыл бұрын
It was a hundred years ago. Get over it.
@kapas20707 жыл бұрын
Great video, please do more like it!
@Horesmi7 жыл бұрын
I'm Frederick the Great, out the gate first servant of state Oblique attack tactics ain't exactly straight I've got creative talents and battle malice Hard as steel on the field, genteel in the palace Russia's fucked up but no wonder why With your tundras and taigas and bears, oh my! I would pay a guy to tear out my eyes If I had to look at your troll face every night Now bring me my chair I'm weary from tearing you a new derrière from here to Red square Fought a Seven Years' War, I ain't scared of a Tsar Cause beating you only took me twelve bars
@Oliver-kw4to7 жыл бұрын
Ivan the terrible vs. Alexander the great :D
@SantiFiore7 жыл бұрын
Best comment section ever
@farzet39377 жыл бұрын
Prussian officers don't mutiny!
@nattygsbord7 жыл бұрын
like Blücher
@farzet39377 жыл бұрын
nattygsbord Yeah and like Fedor
@heightdifference86447 жыл бұрын
British officers don't duck!
@andrewgrandfield72147 жыл бұрын
- von Manstein
@askkedladd7 жыл бұрын
Preussische Feldmarschälle meutern nicht
@GenBuBlu6 жыл бұрын
Some additional info: A musketeer-regiment in this age consisted of ordinary hatmen-companies (“ordinaire companies”) and usually two grenadier companies. So, strictly speaking, grenadiers were not proper units of their own. However, it became typical to bring together the grenadier companies of tweo regiments for the course of a campaign as a “converged grenadier battalion”. Due to the fact that the grenadiers came from two different regiments, the grenadiers in that battalion had two types of uniforms. What might also be interesting for wargamers: The depiction of Prussian uniforms for the Seven Years War is - generally speaking - wrong. It’s mostly based on 19th/early 20th century depictions, which, in turn, are based on the original uniforms that are maintained in the “Deutsche Historische Museum”. True, these are originals, but they stem from the 1780s and thus have a decidedly different cut than uniforms in the 1750s and earlier. It’s also worth noticing that regiments in that age were usually named after their owner. Typically, aristocrats and even princes owned these regiments and had a lot of freedom in managing them (appointing officers, jurisdiction, allowance for marriage, etc), although I’m not really informed about the extent of the authority of the owners in the Prussian army. Often, you can still find references to the owner in the uniform - e.g. the color of the pompoms often refered to the colors in owner’s coat of arms. In the Habsburg army at that time, the owner’s monogram was very often found on shabracks, etc.
@looper14866 жыл бұрын
“Fighting Looters like in Mount & Blade” Now we’re talking
@kern10007 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Excellent presentation. A great companion to watch with Christopher Duffy's book " The Army in the age of Frederick the Great"
@AnnaMarianne7 жыл бұрын
I miss Prussia. The map of Europe is lacking... or at least the map of Germany.
@hazzmati7 жыл бұрын
Aye, Germany looks meager without elzas-lotharingen and east and west prussia
@edi98927 жыл бұрын
Anna Marianne as an Austrian, I want my glorious empire back!
@308473mb7 жыл бұрын
Don't trigger the Poles and Lithuanians, please!
@sergeantpanther6787 жыл бұрын
Nö one cäres aboüt them.
@kaiserwilhelm39337 жыл бұрын
Looking at it, the west actually supports the Polish invasion of Prussia around the end of the middle ages.
@anglohistorian86877 жыл бұрын
Interesting breakdown. When comparing to the modern troops I feel it's also worth noting that the increase in NCOs is also a result of a greater degree of devolved initiative; unlike in Frederick's time small sections of troops are now expected to act with a degree of autonomy. More NCOs are thus required as troops fight in smaller units yet still need to be led.
@freitag424 Жыл бұрын
10:37 Am I the only one who loves the Mount&Blade homage? Thanks for that, made me smile. It´s my favourite game!
@nykolap.54847 жыл бұрын
Please do Prussian stuff again.
@SkyForceOne27 жыл бұрын
What is that symbol on your flag? I seem to recognize it from somewhere.
@nykolap.54847 жыл бұрын
It's a Ukrainian Flag with a Ukrainian Trident in the center. flagspot.net/flags/ua-arms.html Thank you for your curiosity!
@mememem7 жыл бұрын
Please keep making videos on Prussia this is great fap material.
@goksir58456 жыл бұрын
dude i am so hard right now
@dnimlarebil6 жыл бұрын
Rule 34 - confirmed
@BobSmith-dk8nw5 жыл бұрын
"Ihr Racker, wollt ihr ewig leben?" Frederick the Great to his faltering Guard Units Battle of Kolín on 18 June 1757 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kol%C3%ADn (Though this has a slightly different version of the quote). Both versions are generally translated as: "You Rascals, do you want to live forever?" .
@KitteridgeStudios7 жыл бұрын
That Total Biscuit reference though
@dzejrid7 жыл бұрын
Every time he says "Prussia" I keep hearing "Croatia".
@Mkoivuka7 жыл бұрын
My great great something grandfather was a captain in the Pori Brigade (enlisted men from Finland serving under the Swedish king), his 15 year old son was the drummer boy of the company
@viliussmproductions7 жыл бұрын
Cool, I was just reading up on the Prussian millitary (on wikipedia, though). They always mention various army reforms, so this is very interesting.
@hotbam377 жыл бұрын
I love tbis channel but if the English was spoken just a little bit more clearly it would be much bigger channel I'm sure. I have to rewind and listen to certain sentences many times to try and figure out what he says. I think some type of subtitles would be a great addition to the videos. The user-generated subtitles don't catch the hard to understand words. If he could add his own subtitles instead of the auto-generated ones it would be so awesome.
@tomservo53473 жыл бұрын
One of my German mom's friends that lived in Berlin (and saw some terrible things during the battle in 1945) was from an old Prussian family of note. After the war, when Prussia was broken up (and I have strong opinions over this) she received a large amount of money from the West German government for land that used to be her family's estate but was now Poland. When she received mail from family still there the original German name of the town was crossed out and changed to the new Polish/Soviet one. It was a treat seeing the one heirloom she was able to save-a Prussian dress sword adorned with Iron Crosses that had been passed down in her family for generations. It's rather sad how the Allies destroyed this once progressive and honor bound military state.
@neues36917 жыл бұрын
Ich finde du solltest mehr über Neuzeit oder Mittelalter machen. Sehr interessant!
@supergockel53093 жыл бұрын
Nice das du deine Videos jetzt auch telis auf deutsch machst, über die Logistik und die Supplylines könntest du auch ein Video machen da gibt's wirklich nicht viel 🙂 was auch interessant wäre, der unterschied der ganzen französischen Einheiten unter Napoleon ( speziell bei der leichten infantry verstehe ich den nicht ganz)
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized3 жыл бұрын
> Nice das du deine Videos jetzt auch telis auf deutsch machst da liegt ein Mißverständnis vor, dass ist ein altes Video, da hatte ich das Zitat auch auf Deutsch gelesen. Das mach ich schon lange nicht mehr. Zu nap. Infanterie hab ich ein Video, ebenso zur Kavallerie.
@supergockel53093 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryHistoryVisualized achsooo schade, das Video zu nap. Inf. Hab ich schon gefunden danke 🙂
@supergockel53093 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryHistoryVisualized was ist den der Unterschied zwischen Franz. Voltigeure, chasseure und carabiner 😅 das würd mich sehr interessieren.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized3 жыл бұрын
kA zulange aus und ich hab mich nicht mit spezfisichen Streitkräften beschäftigt, weil sonst würde ich 2 Monate an einem Skript sitzen ;)
@MFvanBylandt7 жыл бұрын
You covered one of my favourite subjects! Thanks a lot. I hope if CA ever decides to make an Empire 2 Total War that they watch and use this video. That would put in some much needed accuracy.
@MrPh307 жыл бұрын
Great episode, the Loden in the dark green is the color associated with the Jaegers , and the Brits under Major Rogers copied much of his unitmon the Prussian and Hessian Jagers.
@AinsleyHarriott17 жыл бұрын
Ah nice I always wondered about the Prussian military. Just last night it kept me up for at least 2 hours.
@johnfluker10347 жыл бұрын
Just for future occurrences, "patrone" in German equals "cartridge" in English, so it would be a cartridge bag or cartridge case. "Haber's bag" is more recognizable as a "haversack".
@elimgarak87855 жыл бұрын
Frederick the Great is the one commander that I don’t know if he is overrated or really was as good as his reputation states. He did win brilliantly at Rossbach but at Zorndorf and Kunersdorf he performed poorly. And in the end it took the Tzar to save him. Which I imagine would have been awkward seeing as how Russian cavalry had held Berlin for ransom in 1760.
@HighwayMule7 жыл бұрын
I think it's worth to add that Jager units were the first to be equpied with rifles (weapons with rifled barrels), while the rest of infantry had smoothbore muskets. This was to give accuracy for long range fire.
@TheEk947 жыл бұрын
Would love a similar video about the swedish caroline army. During the swedish empire.
@warrenhapke20915 жыл бұрын
At around 5:40, the word "Patronentasche" is translated as "patron's bag," but it should be "cartridge pouch."
@1GoodDag2 жыл бұрын
my family emigrated from Prussia to Wisconsin... low German speakers... Northern German southern Danish type folk. saving money for a picklehaub 🤣 great content 👌
@michaelsnyder3871 Жыл бұрын
There was one administrative-tactical disadvantage, though other armies suffered from the same issues. The company was an administrative organization. The tactical organization was the eight zugs the battalion adjutant divided the battalion into. He paraded the battalion, the officers and NCOs stepped from the formation and then he divided the battalion into eight evenly numbered zugs. The officers and NCOs were then divided among the zugs. This allowed the battalion, which was also a tactical organization to execute the drill regulations especially in moving from line to column and back and in controlling the battalion's fire. This had to be done before every battle. Most of the northern German states adopted Prussian organization and drill. One reason for Washington's success at Trenton was that the Hessian regiments were billeted by company and were not prepared to execute a defense before reorganizing for combat.
@valhalla96887 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Could you do Gustavus Adolfus video in the future?
@MakeMeThinkAgain7 жыл бұрын
It would be interesting if you were to cover the major transitions in military tactics. For example the way the army of Thebes was finally able to defeat the Spartans. The way the Romans were able to defeat the Macedonian army. The way the stirrup transformed cavalry warfare, say at Hastings. The transition back to the superiority of infantry with pikes. Then to muskets. The rise of field artillery with Napoleon. The American Civil War would be a good place to show the resurgence of infantry, now firing the Minnie-ball. I think you've already covered the transition to fire and maneuver tactics in WW1, but I may be confusing you with The Great War.
@rafiky37035 жыл бұрын
Good video but would be better if you show some images about the soldiers like their clothes and all that
@jamesnave1249 Жыл бұрын
Yeat another great video! Would love you to do a video going into detail about training of a solfier of the day
@burntorangeandblue7 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for this. If you could fit an episode about Clauswitz' reforms, that would be interesting.
@ZS-rw4qq6 ай бұрын
Interesting video, have you considered making a similar one for the Prussian army of the period?
@theodorleberle6 жыл бұрын
Großartiges Video! Leider fehlt mir eine ganz wichtige Information, die ich für ein Referat brauche: wie wurden Grenadiere in der Schlachtformation eingesetzt?
@scottfoster26398 ай бұрын
I might add that there were far more NCOs in the 1940 regiment that the 1743 due to the small unit tactics that a modern army conducts. Other than a few 'raiding ' parties, in 1743, units conducted no smaller operations than a battalion sized unit, with some exceptions (other than guard duties, etc).
@rolland8907 жыл бұрын
yes, more videos on 18th century please !!! :)
@grett55197 жыл бұрын
A dankey.(I once believed i heard all your mispronunciations but then i heard that)
@lolz362357 жыл бұрын
will you be making any more divisional videos for country's such as France and Italy in the foreseeable future?
@truecerium49247 жыл бұрын
In the British Army fusilires were outfitted with the more modern flintlock gun; as the guns posed a lower fire hazard than the muskets fusiliers were used to protect artillery and train
@justinpyke17567 жыл бұрын
Cool! 18th century through Napoleonic warfare is a secret passion of mine. :P
@jadger18717 жыл бұрын
Not so secret if you're telling everyone on the interwebs
@kreol1q1q7 жыл бұрын
Do the contemporary Habsburg forces under Maria Theresa! :)
@99Hokusai7 жыл бұрын
For an insight into Frederick, I would recommend Mitford's biography; very much to the point.
@raulmaximo58107 жыл бұрын
"Fighting Looters like in Mount & Blade", great quote bro.
@Albukhshi10 ай бұрын
@ 2:41 Fun fact: the guardsmen were all grenadiers, regardless of the headdress.
@fuser3127 жыл бұрын
Prussia had socialist government only state in Germany with a socialist government when Hitler came to power. Nazism had its root in Bavaria not Prussia... Infact Nazis destroyed junkers the traditional Prussian nobility.... Anyone linking Nazism with Prussia couldn't be more wrong.
@DawnOfTheDead9917 жыл бұрын
good point
@LethalSword6667 жыл бұрын
the national-conservative prussian aristocracy still helped hitler into power tho (because they thought they could control him)
@preussen49837 жыл бұрын
sahil singh Bavaria was temporarily communist in the early 30's
@spiffygonzales58994 жыл бұрын
@@LethalSword666 No, that was specifically Von Pipen. And frankly he was a terrorist and a political deviant FAR before Hitler. It is complete b.s that he did not get found guilty during the nuremberg trials.
@XLHeavyD9997 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video. Thank you.
@ReaperStarcraft7 жыл бұрын
Hey MHV! I have asked around for sources about this in English and I cannot find any, so while you are on the topic: do you know of any sources to do with the period in the Prussian/German military where they decided to distribute decision-making capability towards the most local (and thus lowest ranked) available officer? Perhaps you could make a video on this? I recall that the German tendency to do this greatly benefitted them in several wars until finally the rest of the world caught up to the policy during World War I, but I would love to know more details!
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
+HydraDM that sounds like Auftragstaktik. Citino might be a good start.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
also Christopher Duffy is a recommended author, but haven't read anything from him yet.
@LibertarianJahbulone7 жыл бұрын
Friedrich II. gambled with the fate of Preußen and could lost all, but he was lucky at the end of the seven year war. Otherwise he most likely had commit suicid. Does this make him a hero or rather a maniac?
@nattygsbord7 жыл бұрын
Well the major powers was conspiring against him so I don't see he had much of choice other than to start a war at point of time that he choose. Taking Schlesien was immature and I think he greatly underestimated the political consequences of his actions. But besides from that I think he was a great statesman. He greatly expanded the countrys territory and population during his reign. The economy grow greatly. The big army had a reputation that made the country an enemy to fear and an ally everyone wish they had. So I think he deserves much credd for his effort to promote new industries, his infrastructure projects such as canal building and draining of swamp, his tradepolicies that diverted money away from other places into his empire. He was also early in seeing the benifits of growing potatoes in Germany. But he also made mistakes grounded in backward thinking, such as his efforts to trying instanly trying to go back to earlier pre-war value of the Thaler directly after the Seven years war and all war inflation. And the result was of course a severe deflationary economic crash. But on the military and political field his mistakes were greater. He made himself enemy of Austria and France and were close to seeing his country lost to the enemy despite all many impressive victories. But afterwards he would repair his foreign relations and improve his economy by taking land from Poland togheter with Russia and Austria.
@nattygsbord7 жыл бұрын
"Frederick’s financial policy was successful inasmuch as he ‘contrived to produce on the economic resources of what was then the least prosperous section of Germany, a public revenue which was greater than that of Russia (under Catherine II), with a per capita burden of taxation no greater than of Austria, and considerably less than that of France’. Moreover Frederick ‘managed to support the army of a first-rate power on the resources of a third-rate state and at the same time accumulated a large reserve in the public treasury’." - Studies in the Economic Policy of Frederick the Great, by Bill Henderson
@Fallout31317 жыл бұрын
I personally think Fredrick was overrated. He inherited the super disciplined organised army from this father, he often fought inferior armies both in command and troop quality. His army could be told to march forward and they basically obliterated anything upfront of them due to quality and his officer core. Not as much unimaginable tactical genius. I like the guy, he's definitely an alright leader, but I think the god complex of the Prussians he gets is over-done.
@Hunt3rK3nw4y6 жыл бұрын
Ah yes.. my favorite King leading my beloved country where most of my ancestry comes from. By the way, I love your German. It's perfect and on point. I lost my touch in the language few years ago, sadly.
@thebog116 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. Random question - did the Prussian grenadiers ever wear the bearskin, or did they switch from the mitre cap to the tricorne?
@robowisanveithasung6022 Жыл бұрын
prussian grenadiers always wore the mitre cap in battle. they retained this tradition until after their defeat at Jena and Auerstadt in 1806. the Officers of Grenadier Companies would wear tricornes though