Psychic Abilities in the US Military "Remote Viewing" Explained

[@TheoriesofEverything]

PLANET WILD: Want to help restore the planet's ecosystems and track your impact with monthly videos? The first 150 people to join Planet Wild will get the first month free at planetwild.com/r/theoriesofeverything/join or by using my code EVERYTHING9. If you’d like to see how they operate first, check out their latest KZbin video at planetwild.com/everything/m19. Main episode with Lue Elizondo (September 2024): kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJmapqCtf9GhaZo

[@ALavin-en1kr]

When he said the illusion of self-awareness and consciousness, he lost me. If he does not know that consciousness is fundamental then he is not worth listening to no matter what his remote viewing is, or is not.

[@NicholasWilliams-h3j]

How can the real Planck length and Planck time value remain constant, and a different observer in a different (space/time reference frame) is also detecting his Planck length and Planck time to be constant as well (but they measure different time passage comparatively)? Boom, the real Planck lengths are differential, (otherwise you wont detect constant Planck length). Mass loses and gains energy to meet thermodynamic pressure equilibrium with it's local reference frame while maintaining the same particle count. Think about it, Planck length contracts with Planck time (equally), because Planck time is a pushing pressure, and Planck length is the extension of length do to that pushing pressure (they grow and shrink proportionally, as well as mass observers within that Planck time reference frame), while light is a oscillatory collision between Planck units (Planck units are shorter in a gravity field, thus less energy, therefore the photon has larger effect on those Planck units [photon momentum increases in a gravity field do to Planck length contraction]). This is the only theory that meets all observational criteria, and modern physics has formulated the equations wrong.

[@TheMadmacs]

@@ALavin-en1kr he also stated that he didnt know if he believed it then at the end aid he believed it, the guy is a low quality hustler, ffs curt.

[@gencymexmex6412]

Planet wild sounds almost exactly like the project I worked on at giveth, minus the cryptocurrency part! I'm so excited that there is another organization that is doing good for the planet and making those people that take money to do those things, provide tangible proof that they are using the money that you gave them, on the things that you give it to them for!

[@harveyFOSHO]

Whenever there are paid psychics on the local police payroll who have a publicly verifiable track record of solving crimes … then I’ll take it seriously. I believe in intuition but the line between intuition and psychic is blurry.

[@messenger8279]

I have noticed how people are becoming far more open minded to concepts that a few years ago would have been dismissed. I certainly fall into that category.

[@Mr2505federal]

Is it that because just writing about it in a book, or saying it on a podcast isn't proving anything beyond all doubt. Im a federal agent, see I can say anything without proof! Look at my you tube name makes you think I'm a federal agent, GUESS WHAT IM NOT A FEDERAL AGENT, NEVER WORKED FOR THE GOVT! How did I get my name when I joined yt I wanted several names but all taken, you tube suggested a whole list of names and I just clicked on one and kept it.

[@like-icecream]

@@Mr2505federal I believe you are a federal agent becasue the quantum entanglement says you can be in two places at the same time, who is to say the other you isn't the real FBI. Mister Mulder, yeah not buying it...I mean I am

[@SpamMouse]

I thought you would be saying that.

[@_WeDontKnow_]

Yea I would've rolled my eyes at this years ago. Proud of how open minded I've become while still maintaining my skepticism with everything I come across.

[@_WeDontKnow_]

@@Teronix100 I agree when he gets into *how* it works and the mechanics of it, he's just trying to fit it into our empirical findings. and he's probably not right. the notion of Remote Viewing being possible is what I would've rolled my eyes at before

[@smithaz1981]

OBVIOUSLY ITS TIME FOR CURT TO GO TO THE MONROE INSTITUTE

[@raoultesla2292]

Monroe DVD's can still be found. Self hypnosis from CIA MK_Ultra studies will make you free and honest and on time to work.

[@dougrowe11]

Agreed

[@benkenobi7800]

You are a Barrow minded NPC troll bot

[@benkenobi7800]

Probably a Psi op trying to disinform viewers whom probably are unaware of this topic

[@benkenobi7800]

Troll

[@michaelwoods1361]

I genuinely feel bad for people who haven’t ever remote viewed intentionally or accidentally. Once you do, you have a whole new respect and interest for people like Lue, but more importantly, the information and science behind it.

[@graphite7473]

This one time in 1998 or 99 in Edmonton during the Fringe Festival, there was this busker in a black tuxedo doing a single magic trick with a deck of cards. It was $1 per go, and he told you to just *think* of a card, any card. He split the deck, and it was always the card you were thinking of on top of the bottom half when he flipped it. Like, *every time*. You didn’t tell anyone, you didn’t take a card, or look through the deck. He had no way of knowing your card, nevermind that he basically held the deck perfectly still throughout. It was weird because there was no way to prove to anyone but yourself that it worked, if you whispered to your friend the card you picked he would say pick another one, don't tell anyone. I gave him $20 one by one, 20 times he flipped over the exact card I had in mind, all different cards. Every one of my friends with me at the time tried at least 5 times each, and he got every single card right.

[@larsonfamilyhouse]

I had someone come into the bar i worked in and had me hold a deck of cards then they took my card and flicked it from a few feet away and i felt it go into the deck i was holding, it went to the side closest to my hand, impossible but when i looked, there was my card

[@mobberleyman6112]

@graphite7473 from your description he would appear to have truly read your mind, but its just not possible. Wish id of been there id have asked him to describe other things in my thoughts not just cards, though what he did with you and your friends was extremely impressive to say the least.

[@graphite7473]

@@larsonfamilyhouse that's pretty rad.

[@helmutstransky3761]

Nice story, but I do not believe you. Why would someone with such an extraordinary ability use it to earn 1$ ago? He could have taken the James Randi Challenege and earned a million. Or countless other things to get a lot of money, Black Jack for example. By the way, the challenge runs for many years, i think since the 80ies, you can google that. Nobody ever won it. What is possible is a scenario where he talks to you and uses quick hand gestures, body language, etc. to manipulate you to a certain card. But not 20 times in a row.

[@blakesleyk.7166]

In a more just world TOE videos would have more subs than Rogan.

[@mikebozik]

No kidding!😊

[@bradharris1062]

If all matter is connected by fields of energy, then it's just about both sides being tuned, if its one way u have to find a way to tune in to that experience, what they felt , saw etc

[@jf9387]

I dunno about Lue, everything he says is cleared by his employer. He seems to be very talented at talking and not saying very much. An excellent orator. Almost the perfect candidate to spread misinformation. Whether he knows it or not.

[@AdMBandLeader]

Exactly. But look at those who take his word for real. People have forgotten to use their own intelligence to research things. I'm not saying the phenomenon is unreal but this guy definitely is a tool of distraction from the real thing I highly suspect.

[@xLordKakashi]

@@AdMBandLeader I disagree. It isnt just Lue, there are other high ranked personel involved that have much more to lose being involved with this subject than Lue. Karl Nell, Tim Gallaudet, Chris Mellon, etc. You are focusing too much on Lue and thats why you fail at seeing the big picture. The disclosure process is something much broader than what you are thinking.

[@unsettled-w5u]

I think that's what he was trying to convey above ​@@xLordKakashi

[@warfighter1988]

You have a guy ruining his life to come out and speak out about subjects the goverment avoided for 80 years and he's somehow spreading misinformation? makes no sense he says nhi are real he's saying remote viewing is real he's saying they might be threat he list all the programs he's a part of he says that the phenomenon can be almost ghostly in how it interacts with you and somehow he says nothing? Honestly, and i mean this respectfully , you're just not a smart enough person to have an opinion on of its real or not.

[@charliemopps4926]

@@xLordKakashi I'll tell you what is probably going on... Trump was president... he said a bunch of stuff publicly that revealed a lot of military capability that he shouldn't have... regardless of your views on his politics, I think we can all agree he's got a big mouth and is a braggart. So the US military panicked, not wanting their secrets out in the public, and decided to take control of the conversation. So they got a bunch of military folks that were either retired, or close to retired, and got them to pretend to be whistle blowers to associate all these weird sightings and what-not (which are almost certainly just classified US military tech) with aliens, telepathy, and other general pseudoscience... they want to get this stuff back to what it was previously... embarrassing to talk about. The science is clear... faster than light travel is completely impossible... traveling between stars, regardless of your level of technology level, is incredibly difficult for a variety of reasons... and we have absolutely nothing to offer even the most curious aliens with the tech to actually travel here. It doesn't make any sense that they'd go through all that effort. Even IF they started traveling here the moment they saw cavemen in their telescopes, that would limit their distance to 100k lightyears which is nothing on a galactic scale. What's far far far more likely is the US federal government has figured out some tech they want to keep secret so they are spreading misinformation to hide it. They've done it before, many times.

[@XYouVandal]

A year ago, I had my first and only ayahuasca ceremony. Before the main event, they gave me some other plant medicine that was supposed to cleanse my pineal gland, which would help me in the relaxation and breathing exercises we were about to do. They had me lay down in a relaxed state with my eyes closed. I remember seeing a green glow in the shape of an eye where my forehead was, I thought it was just a reaction to the sunlight hitting my closed eyelids, but it stayed in tact and in the same spot. I focused on it and found it flickered and changed colors from green to red and back to green. I realized this was obviously the psychedelic properties of the medicine they gave me. I described what i saw and they sounded surprised, but we got into some kind of therapy session and she asked me to picture myself as a child of 6 years. Where did I live? etc. As I focused on this closed eye visual of a (presumed) third eye, I felt like I was getting lost in it, but then i recalled this mundane, uneventful memory from my childhood when I was 6, it was just me playing outside by myself, observing my shadow on a sunny day. It was so vivid, I almost felt like I was really back there, viewing the world through my 6 year old eyes. After we finished, I tried describing what the closed eye visual looked like, they then informed me that there were absolutely no psychedelic properties in the plant medicine I was given. This was shocking to me. I wish I could understand what I experienced and find others with a similar story that could help broaden my understanding

[@kayakMike1000]

In Catholicism, its called bilocation. Its one of the miracles of the saints, one monk was known to be deep in prayer in the monastery, but also seen visiting the pope three countries away.

[@lrwiersum]

I have a micro preemie Grandson that I remote view in the Hospital. Two months in and I haven’t been wrong yet. My bond is PARTICULARLY strong with him.

[@dustinalker972]

@@lrwiersum interesting, can you explain?

[@aaron-n]

I had an OBE/remote viewing event happen in my sleep. It's real and once I truly internalized years later I can say it does freak you out knowing that the reality we are currently in isn't all that there is, I calmed myself down once I came to the conclussion that nature ultimately is in charge and knows what it's doing.

[@High.Desert]

I don't believe you.

[@grandrapids57]

That's interesting: I have these events "a little bird told me" and they occur just a few minutes prior to some event: it is a feeling that I need to question what I am doing and when I get these feelings- and I ignore them, it turns out that they are always correct. It is almost always in the case of something I need to take with me and if I don't take that thing with me when I get such a feeling, it turns out I actually needed it. Unfortunately, the feeling is so slight, I frequently ignore it and I've been trying to teach myself to watch for it because it is never, and I mean never, wrong.

[@aaron-n]

@@High.Desert Good! Skepticism is healthy and to be frank I don't really think there's anyway to prove it to anyone. Those types of experiences are subjective although mine did have somewhat of an objective nature to it in the sense that other people were in the room and witnessed my reaction to the experience upon waking up. In the end, if it doesn't happen to you then it's hard to believe.

[@aaron-n]

@@grandrapids57 Meditation might help with that. I admit I don't meditate regularly but I have gotten to the point during a meditation where I didn't have any thoughts at all and wasn't counting breaths or anything. I just observe the thoughts like observing clouds and let whatever feeling those thoughts bring as well without resisting them but also not latching on to them either. Eventually the thoughts kind of give up and it was like being in boundless awareness. Once you're in that stillness and a thought or feeling comes back in it's very clear and recognizable and you're much more in tuned to where it's coming from.

[@muddwhistle7833]

Order of the British Empire?

[@Mikkeymike1212]

Finally after 44 years became a believer in the power of the mind. Saw a paranormal mind reader show in Vegas last weekend and this guy 100% was able to read minds. Over and over and over. Went out of his way to prove it to me. Not only that but somehow predicted what future numbers would be. My girlfriend volunteered to see if it was real for one part and somehow when he touched the other volunteer across the stage with a feather, she felt it, just like he said was going to happen. Then did the same the other way around. She had no reason to lie. Backstage, he told me to think of any number 1-100 and to lock it in and don't change it. Without me saying anything, he wrote down the number I was thinking of on his brochure and told me to tell my friends and family. I am now a believer. Also, we came to the conclusion that guy might be an alien or hybrid. Definitely real though

[@DJWESG1]

derren brown says what?

[@NannyMcRib]

While it doesn't bring me joy to reveal Santa Claus isn't real, I can't just let this slide I'm sorry 😂 Mentalists employ a combination of psychological techniques and clever tricks to seemingly guess numbers with high accuracy. These methods include subtly influencing the spectator's choice through suggestion and forcing, exploiting statistical probabilities of commonly chosen numbers, using multiple prepared outcomes, gathering pre-show information, creating dual realities where the spectator believes they have a free choice, cold reading body language, and utilizing mathematical tricks. While no single technique guarantees 100% accuracy, skilled mentalists combine these methods with showmanship and misdirection to create the illusion of mind reading, making a 1% probability appear to be a certainty. I could get into the other one but I don't want to make this an essay. I love magic so I happen to know a lot of this stuff. Stay open minded but not gullible folks 🙏

[@NannyMcRib]

While it doesn't bring me joy to reveal Santa Claus isn't real, I can't just let this slide I'm sorry 😂 Mentalists employ a combination of psychological techniques and clever tricks to seemingly guess numbers with high accuracy. These methods include subtly influencing the spectator's choice through suggestion and forcing, exploiting statistical probabilities of commonly chosen numbers, using multiple prepared outcomes, gathering pre-show information, creating dual realities where the spectator believes they have a free choice, cold reading body language, and utilizing mathematical tricks. While no single technique guarantees 100% accuracy, skilled mentalists combine these methods with showmanship and misdirection to create the illusion of mind reading, making a 1% probability appear to be a certainty. I could get into the other one but I don't want to make this an essay. I love magic so I happen to know some of this stuff. Stay open minded but not gullible folks 🙏

[@pookz3067]

Getting fooled by well known tricks of the trade is wild.

[@_WeDontKnow_]

I feel like most people automatically assume it's a trick if it's a show/performance. Then they try to explain the inner workings of "the trick" and it's clear they're just reaching for an explanation that fits with their world view. No matter how ridiculous and inconvenient the explanation is. Oh and no need for the alien hypothesis :D humans can develop this skill just like anything else. But maybe being hybrid is what makes some people naturally better at remote viewing? Definitely possible

[@squireca]

the men who stare at goats.

[@CrazyLinguiniLegs]

Lonely shepherds looking to “scratch the old itch”? I kid, I kid. I know the movie.

[@galewollenberg786]

Every photon in the universe knows what every other photon in the universe is doing!

[@reynoldsbeng3756]

There is only one photon

[@pookz3067]

That’s doesn’t mean the human brain has proper methods to read this information, which no one has been able to prove in a controlled setting. Why can’t literally anyone do better than random chance in a controlled setting???

[@beautiful4est]

your paranoia knows no fear :))

[@galewollenberg786]

@@reynoldsbeng3756 Well, lets see, you are a physics hobbyist, a physics professor, or a Bible believer.Hmmm.

[@mw9297]

@@pookz3067heavenly forces deny it 👽🛸

[@Tyrell_Corp2019]

Consciousness extends beyond the little pile of flesh that we call our bodies. I personally met an autistic child who could barely speak, but could read your mind. It was the most life-changing event I ever had.

[@James-ll3jb]

Knew a Harvard psychologist who knew guys who worked on this, and as of 2005 they could successfully do it.

[@helmutstransky3761]

Yeah? What did they do with it?

[@timbrown6715]

This dude really never says anything

[@davebee70]

Agreed.

[@nagualdesign]

That seems to be the raison d'être of this channel. Sad really, but the Information Age was incredibly brief. We're living in the Misinformation Age.

[@drzecelectric4302]

Yep. On and on

[@alexanderstainton3199]

I feel like this guy had a lot of credibility in my eyes until I hear remote viewing and then I'm like... Hmmm. You lost me bro. Go on, keep saying quantum and pretend you knows what it means.

[@helmutstransky3761]

@@alexanderstainton3199 Hahaha, i thought the same. Not easy to understand that quantum stuff, i have to admit. And i know "oldschool" computers and code on a very deep level.

[@gdr189]

Itzhak Bentov, the pendulum book. Basically we are diff'ing our lived holograms inference pattern with the 'new' one being received and updating that part. There is no real space/material, we are perceivers, experiencing movement as the current now, created by and for a self-perceiving universe. I'm leaning towards soul / consciousness being plasma energy. Possibly linked with the Kordylewski cloud dust/plasma around earth and the moon.

[@virtualmonk2072]

I found myself watching The Hollywood medium the other day. In the video he was hooked up to an EEG to measure his brain activity. The results were stark in the differences between resting state to when he did a reading of Steve o. His process involved scribbling on a notebook,it reminded me of remote viewers and those techniques ❤

[@laurabarber6697]

We make the consciousness decision to "switch" into a different mind set. I know when I have done it. And from that new mind set I have a different perspective and access to information in that perspective. One way to describe it would be a "filter* just as one can see differently using a night filter. 💝

[@benkenobi7800]

There are several ways to consider molecular compounds and alien life, including: *Different biochemistry *Molecular assembly (MA) number *Alien compounds *Autocatalytic reactions *Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) Now consider the possibility of having molecular compounds embedded in human tissue that are completely alien

[@ned1621]

Absolutly loved Lue's answer to the Soul question at the very end.. This guy has put up with all sorts of threats and so glad to see his book doing well. The book is excellent...

[@dtown5id]

Curt, I'd love if you did a deeper dive into remote viewing type phenomenon with lesser known names than the Putthoffs and Targs and McMoneagle's. I'm not sure who else you might research but maybe Lue can give you some links.

[@jimbob8992]

Remote viewing is a product of the Cold War, where parts of the American intelligence community believed it was possible that Russia was tracking submarines carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles. It was fear that drove them to take remote viewing seriously.

[@_WeDontKnow_]

That's a solid theory but have you ever considered remote viewing could be real? I know that sounds like a weird question but there's decades of research on stuff like this. There's a meta-analysis of 90+ experiments from 13+ countries showing human behavior being affected by future events. The results showed in both peer reviewed papers and non-peer reviewed papers. It's posted on the national institute of health .gov website, it's entitled "Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events" if you're interested. Or ignore the meta-analysis, and go read the raw peer-reviewed papers. I know remote viewing sounds wacky and most people roll their eyes at it. I don't blame anyone for not believing in it. But whether you need empirical evidence, government documents, personal anecdotes, or the ability to do it yourself, it's all available to you. This stuff does exist.

[@mobberleyman6112]

Yes and the initial 70's tests just took a percentage of things the remote viewer got right from say viewing a specific room. If only slightly above a by chance result they said it was proof it worked. Isnt it obvious if you could actually remote view something you should be 100% correct otherwise its just guessing.

[@_WeDontKnow_]

That's a solid theory but have you ever considered remote viewing could be real? I know that sounds like a weird question but there's decades of research on stuff like this. There's a meta-analysis of 90+ experiments from 13+ countries showing human behavior being affected by future events. The results showed in peer reviewed papers and non-peer reviewed papers. It's posted on the national institute of health .gov website, it's entitled "Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events" if you're interested. I know remote viewing sounds wacky and most people roll their eyes at it. I don't blame anyone for not believing in it. But if you need empirical evidence, it's out there. This stuff is real.

[@_WeDontKnow_]

@@mobberleyman6112 there's a huge gap between 100% accuracy and "just guessing", that's where the results for these decades of studies reside. They're too statistically significant to be explained by random chance, or "just guessing".

[@_WeDontKnow_]

there's a meta-analysis on the national institute of health website showing human behavior being affected by future events. "Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events" if you're interested. results showed in both peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed studies. 14 different countries. 30+ labs. Idk about specific remote viewing claims but "this stuff" absolutely exists. There's empirical evidence proving its existence.

[@wulphstein]

Remote viewing research is a good choice. The right direction. 🎉🎉🎉

[@precogpeter]

The other week, on September 11, I Remote Viewed this question and got a lot of information related to West Point Military Academy.

[@soarmilo2703]

Love the content

[@Benajames79]

How is everyone's BS meter? I'm 50/50 Same with David Grusch

[@stoneneils]

Its just you. Adults don't waste their lives on bs. It certainly doesn't pay enough.

[@carlwide6594]

99.9% bs.

[@liamgross7217]

He’s very intelligent and interesting. But my remote viewing keeps seeing a bull in a paddock dropping a hot steaming one

[@pookz3067]

I am a research scientist who has experimented with this stuff in my own enough that I don’t think I’m close minded about this. My BS meter here is at 100% though. He does not seem to be convincing ppl in good faith but tricking them.

[@Benajames79]

He has a book and on every podcast..somethings not right. I heard something is coming in 2027 so maybe the govt is trying to get us exposed to true reality?

[@akolyte22]

The group I'm linked up with is interested in you giving them Target IDs to work to show you the capabilities of remote viewing

[@Robertsmith-un5cu]

This guy comes off as a bullshitter to me.

[@robcraven2626]

I knew you were going to say that

[@kylebushnell2601]

Based on watching a couple clips of him. Man do better for yourselves 🤣 It’s like watching a couple videos about physics and then coming to large conclusions about the general topic. Come on, dude. Have a good weekend. Perhaps take the time to look into this topic besides just a couple Lou Elizondo clips lol

[@robcraven2626]

@@kylebushnell2601 You can tell how many videos someone has watched, and how deeply (or not) they've looked into a subject! Amazing! I was extremely sceptical, but I'm starting to think this remote viewing could be the real deal!

[@davebee70]

Same, he’s a good waffler with a ton of “don’t know” “some people say this” etc etc

[@camden.council.victim9652]

I saw an “Orb” outside the window in Dundee Scotland UK. War is Evil.

[@homefrontforge]

I will echo what he says about understanding what it is and how it happens. I don't either. But I do know precognition, dreams of the future, and visions exist. I wish I understood it better.

[@tonyse7en523]

If you need permission from the government to talk about certain topics then you are NOT a whistleblower. You are their mouthpiece. That’s why he gives little information and talks a lot.

[@bustownbc2787]

When your talking about implants I wish lue would give dr.leir his credit....

[@maxgregorycompositions6216]

you're

[@joshuam4993]

Cool story. I learned about the physics of rv from a guy that could do it and was also a bio physicist in the military involved with these programs. Relativity and quantum mechanics are not enough, and in fact, cannot ever get there. They gone miles and miles ahead. To the point where the faculty can be enhanced or even shielded against

[@helmutstransky3761]

So? what did you learn besides what is not enought?

[@joshuam4993]

@@helmutstransky3761 I learned how it works. The techniques and tools that rv doesn't teach. But it's also ancients. Energetics helps. Other visualization techniques also help develop the faculty. So, how to get the cells to maximum threshold to I crease the strength of the signal. And also, that rv is still taken seriously and used in certain deep circles. The official claim, and even claim from star gate guys is the government stopped studying it. Not true Oh and also there are ways to defend yourself from it, as well as tech that can surround an Area they dint want u snooping

[@BettyBetty-cq3eb]

your guest is GREAT! love your videos. thank you much

[@NightRunner417]

There are a lot of interesting points to chase here with regard to time, the conscious mind, and extra-normal information. All _I_ know is that there really IS something beyond just the mundane crap we insist as reality in our experiences, and we're all doing ourselves a huge disservice by trying to vilify these things or pretend they don't exist. There's a lot more going on there, like barely noticeable shadows drifting over all we know, everywhere, and our own thoughts and mental experiences are a LOT more complex and rich than we realize, and this reality is far more complex and mercurial than we would like to believe. It's when you go to all the trouble to start digging at those boundaries of "normal" that you'll start to notice that there's a lot more "not-normal" going on than you realized, and then you have to ask yourself if things were ever really normal here. In the end, there's a choice to be made: 1) be a chicken and live life by established rules and acceptable versions of reality, or 2) grow a pair and start digging at that wall until a little hole opens up and you start getting things coming through it that you can't explain. Then grow a BIG pair and start trying to chop that hole wide open until your reality becomes an ever bigger mix of this mundane world and what lies beyond it/through it.

[@thebeardedseeker5633]

That was a powerful and insightful final statement about the soul. I don't think I'll forget this. 15:20

[@georgelobuonoAuthor]

In past human telepathy, we thought it was only us. Now, that’s not a good explanation. Now, we find out that condensed matter brings minds close, allowing easy networking via universe-spanning energy halo, nearly instantly. It isn’t merely the speed of light that shortens distances; the condensed-and-halo universe overlaps them. So, in fraction-of-the-universe contours, consciousness blends across all galaxies. The science is easy to understand. The key to doing so is to know that there's a full universe diameter wave-span, or wave space, which allows nearly instant mind communications by good e.t.'s across vast distances. To be able to sense far across the universe shows us that consciousness is condensed-and-halo exchanges within that universe wave-span, at all times. To imagine that it’s any less would be misleading. At light speed, time slows to a near stop and all distances shorten to zero. However, moving in the entire, universe-spanning wave-space we have superfluid control over time’s contours. In such a condition, we can skip across vast matter concentrations without feeling slowed, at all. Instead, it’s like halo is all of time. At plus-or-minus light speed, our nerve signals feel out, around vast volume-of-time, so consciousness lenses from one location in the universe to another, nearly instantly. Again, we merely think ourselves there. We bend out beyond the speed of light without feeling any distortions. In other words, we’re exotically extra-dimensional, lensing about in the full universe span via the condensed-and-halo relationship. It neatly subsumes all other mind physics. So, when we erase the notion of physical boundaries, it’s as though we’re not really physical. The only reason why human scientists fell short of this basic realization was because, rather than begin from a universe-spanning extra-dimensional sum of perspectives, they lapsed to tiny quantum diagrams.

[@unsettled-w5u]

I love your style and the vibe dude

[@danmar007]

I heard this guy on dozens of Art Bell podcasts. He's full of it.

[@_WeDontKnow_]

love this dude and love this topic, but there's 0 evidence suggesting the hypothesis that consciousness arises from quantum processes in the brain.

[@helmutstransky3761]

It´s just a trendy thing at the moment, i need to read a scientific opinion about it. I heard the connection to brain and remote viewing for the first time here. It sounds cool, though. What i find interesting are the dreamlike outputs of AI, and if quantum computers will improve AI.

[@ashtar523]

"I'm not a dentist so I can't tell you wether or not you should brush your teeth" - L. Elizondo Remote viewing is a fascinating subject, with all its implications if it is a real thing.

[@ashtar523]

"I'm not a boat so I can't tell you if you will float" - L. Elizondo

[@ashtar523]

"I'm not a farmer so I can't tell you wether or not that is a horse" - L. Elizondo

[@Odihmantich]

“I am not a best selling author so I can’t tell you if you should read this comment or not” - L. Elizondo

[@stoneneils]

Its def real but I don't think we can imply anything until we can understand how it works. Its a topic i hate because i can do it and it drives me crazy, its something i wish i never discovered. I try not to think about it or do it but every few years i get stupid and run a few remote viewing sessions and freak myself out too badly. HOW can it possibly be real..drives me up the wall.

[@AdMBandLeader]

"But I'm an agent and can definitely tell you that they've been using me as a tool for distraction and to build up a fake alien invasion" - Lue Elizondo.

[@clintnorton4322]

The 'mechanism' here is empathic resonance, similar to morphogenic resonance. The 'viewer' is partially tuning in to the resonance field created by the entity, location, or event. As Lew said, interpretation of the resonance may vary.

[@Ultra-nationalismcancer]

Is he going to reveal alien photos in a new book in the future 😂

[@ned1621]

Based on 35 years of following the topic I detect Zero BS from Lue Elizondo, David Grusch, Dr Gary Nolan, Dr Karl Nell, Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet, Commander David Fravour, Pilot Ryan Graves, Former Defense Canadian Minister Paul Hellyer, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Bob Lazar, Frederick Vakentich, Travis Walton and his 6 mates, Betty and Barney Hill, Sergeant Lonnie Zamora etc... Theyre here but we don't have the photos sadly the USA government have them well locked away...

[@laurabarber6697]

Remote viewing is a normal and natural ability that we have been ridiculed for using. They'd call you crazy and lock you up.

[@helmutstransky3761]

No "they" don´t. Though they should.

[@Chris-gl1oj]

Multiple dimensions each one with a higher or lower temporal signature. Fundamental particles shared between each dimension, higher temporal reactions take priority and impart residual trace of pervious dimensional state to lower dimension ( deja v, remote viewing).

[@SpamMouse]

In all seriousness, it starts with the small things, what I might have called random intuition many years ago is now something else. There's depth to this topic.

[@edriley2703]

Hitchhiker effect should be a concern for any remote viewer. Everyone is responsible for their actions.

[@MyraSeavy]

@edriley2703 True! I've seen several comments of people who tried it, and had scary, and even evil consequences! I won't open my mind to that kind of uncertainty! Be careful, people!

[@bluenothing720]

Appreciate you sir.

[@supergalactic6429]

I actually thought that it would be so cool for them to make a VR headset then show the actual images of what the remote viewing is seeing past present and future we could stop a lot of crime before they happened

[@larsonfamilyhouse]

Anyone can do it. Dont need a headset, jus5 your mind. Headset already included.

[@gospelofthomas77thpearl22]

Yes indeed, some people don’t have the Source within them, or rather are not connected to it.

[@Mikeduffey_]

So fascinated by this but would love to see some evidence.

[@ModuliOfRiemannSurfaces]

You’re not going to see any because it’s not happening lol

[@undrlghthmn]

unless your not a conspiricy theorist there is plenty evidence outthere, but i don't recommend to seek evidence on such an extraordinary claim as remote viewing, i suggest to seek proof for it and the only way to get definite proof for it is to perform it by yourself (but i have to warn you, if you succeed in performing, it can be really painfull to know this as true and watch sociaty deny and spit all over it)

[@XPLOSIVization]

Remote viewing is basically Prayer, and has been around since the dawn of man, If you want to find out for yourself if its true, Then while in your bed alone at night look to the sky & ask for a sign and keep asking, You will get the answer you seek if you truly want that answer, but once you open that door you cant shut it, so beware, and No im not religious, but i do believe the Vatican knew that remote viewing worked so well that it could be used for control and order with religion, So much so that "Prayer" is incorporated into every single Religion on the planet and some pray many times a day

[@DerekDuror]

Check out: Seeing without eyes documentary. It's German kids playing while blindfolded and discussing their experiences with the filmmaker. Edit:Seeing without eyes documentary Matrixwissen

[@generallobster]

I think if you were looking for that P value that demonstrates statistical significance and a simple yes it is true or, no it is not true -that type of cut and dry evidence in a single concise published peer reviewed paper-this level 1 evidence isn’t readily available. There is a lot of quantitative data, but apparently the statistical conclusions are a little bit controversial, meaning that the differences are small and the methods are complicated and possibly influenced by bias of multiple sources which is difficult to control considering The methodology of remote viewing itself. Anytime you need someone else to give you information, and you give information back and may interpret that information, that Is a potential huge source of bias, and it is a difficult placebo to design.

[@Rocknrolldaddy81-xy8ur]

Resonance is a metaphor for communication, information, monologue, dialogue, continuous and discrete.

[@bernardwolff8742]

A bit surprised Curt didn’t know "metabolism". Or maybe just in that context.

[@TheoriesofEverything]

I don't recall exactly, but I believe what I was saying is that one can't look at metabolism and infer life, because metabolism is an emergent property contingent on the prior classification of an entity as living. Rather, you have to have already declared something as living before you can talk about its metabolism. While we can draw analogies between metabolic-like processes in living organisms and energy transformations or self-repair mechanisms in non-living systems (such as smartphones etc.) these analogies don't confer life status on non-animate objects. They illustrate functional similarities without implying biological equivalence. Metabolism is generally considered a characteristic of life, though not sufficient on its own to define life. I believe that was the point, though it's been a while since I recorded this. Hope that helps! - Curt

[@bernardwolff8742]

@@TheoriesofEverything its really(!) great having you and people like you!. Especially in these days!

[@rolandgibbs9036]

@@TheoriesofEverything Thanks Curt, it looked to me as if Lou was swerving the question but now in retrospect, I think he had just gone a little too far down the analogy route. Maybe what he was refering to is more like a virus which is not widely regarded as life but obviously has a metabolism of sorts.

[@BitMatt1]

I've always looked at humanity as physical, soulical, and spiritual. To leave out the spirit would be an inaccurate representation of human life.

[@helmutstransky3761]

That´s your problem.

[@Dgree.23]

@@BitMatt1 it’s because are physical bodies are just holorgrams

[@erikanderson123]

Final question, does P Diddy have a soul?

[@ichigokurosaki2838]

Terrance Howard said once we are cosmicly blind.

[@RodCornholio]

Best Lou interview I have ever seen.

[@trevorgwelch7412]

Can remote viewers see winning lottery numbers . ? Think about it .

[@carolvassallo26]

I think they see what is not what's to come

[@Shadowdaddy87]

Especially when it is related to another persons mind. Basically, they can only discover the experiences of other minds. ​@carolvassallo26

[@henryperez1514]

Depends. Sometimes they can and there are stories of people doing this but most of the time majority of people are not so accurate to see all those numbers. Remote viewing for money that i've seen done is more reliable with things like the stock market or forex or crypto.

[@High.Desert]

​@@carolvassallo26I think they see nothing. Total dilusion

[@Coreyman32488]

It’s the quantum effect. It’s not going to let you observe it. Only god itself can choose reality.

[@aaronbaca]

So a couple nights ago I was laying in bed and I saw myself in a car accident in an intersection I drive through a couple times a week. I said a prayer, cause I was like man, I never have a visual like that and I wanted to give thanks for keeping me safe. I thought wow, I must have been saved today and the angels are letting me know. The next day I drive down the hill and I am not even thinking about it and theirs a truck upside down in the intersection. I had never seen an accident there before. Maybe I saw something in the future or maybe my subconscious had a bad feeling about that intersection. Anyhow.

[@stoneneils]

That is how we all disocver we have the potential to do remote viewing..it happen one time spontaneaously..then we learn about it and practice it for a while until we get it. That is generally the type of information we get..very vague or off in some regards..but very accurate in others..and MUCH too coincidental over and over and over that it can't be coincidence every time. I never miss...but how much sense i can make out of it before it not always apparent.

[@strainsmoker]

He might have been looking for the name “Merlin”. lol

[@alexedgar6539]

It's so ironical that the arrival of aliens validates my chosen profession as an energy healer. How geeky us that?

[@charlesbrightman4237]

CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: He mentioned how vast this universe is, and yet, there are some humans on this Earth that truly believe that they and they alone are the only chosen ones of a God that created the entire universe and all in it. (And besides, God only exists as a concept alone, nothing more.)

[@carlwide6594]

No. You've got it all backwards. God is the only thing there is, everything else is a concept.

[@ThePowerLover]

@@carlwide6594 So he is satanic.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@carlwide6594 Well, please prove that 'God' truly exists besides just as a concept alone. Please also prove that 'you' are only just a concept and nothing more.

[@ilsospetto4608]

"that's for another conversation" -> next book.

[@wade8130]

Remote viewing really makes you challenged yourself by asking yourself if you really are practicing open-mindedness. It's tempting to draw a line and slam your brain shut when you get close to it. We shouldn't. We can be brave and open without abdicating our intellect.

[@helmutstransky3761]

I was open minded for many things for 30 years+. No more, proof or i do not care anymore. I have heard all the claims and stories. Elizondo is a bookselling fraud.

[@Hierarchangel]

Still patiently waiting for some evidence from anyone. I've been waiting since I was a kid, 50+ years ago, when I read Chariots of the Gods. I wonder if there is an expert on belief out there that Curt could interview.

[@TInyK12]

Ah this explains how Bran knew how to warg into other animals and go back in time.

[@thesteelworks8088]

just downloaded imminent looking forward to read it

[@ichigokurosaki2838]

Did he look into Walter Russell's work?

[@bustownbc2787]

The white clear cover is keratin

[@Mr2505federal]

Okay he should be able to prove this beyond all doubt! Hes needs to stop talking about it and PROVE IT BEYOND ALL DOUBT!

[@ThePowerLover]

Oh, you sweet summer child. Do you want to go into epistemology?

[@Mr2505federal]

@@ThePowerLover I'm sorry is proving what your claiming unthinkable!

[@pookz3067]

⁠@@ThePowerLoverhe should prove things to conventionally accepted standards of proof, regardless of epistemology. If you’re not going to do that, you need to start with people changing their epistemology, not use these underhanded religious, mystical experience type tactics. The claims surrounding the epistemology of remote viewing match identically the epistemological claims around prayer, manifestation, and other mystical experiences l, so they should be dismissed for the same reasons, hasn’t this ground been trodden enough? Not that I am neither materialist nor an atheist. I just do not think I have any propositional truth claims about my spirituality, and using language that makes people think I have access to more objective information in the material world is evil and dishonest, even if I think such information could ease their suffering

[@ryanperrault8174]

Is Time a coordinate?...A possible location for a specific instance of possibility that we experience linearly?

[@kayakMike1000]

Its woo woo until we figure it out.

[@KT-en8pq]

Remote viewing is not an electromagnetic phenomenon. Russel Targ and Harold Putoff.

[@smithaz1981]

IS THAT A MAGNET ON HIS PHONE . I NEED THAT MAGNETS ON PHONES

[@Veheloth]

It's crazy thinking about how much of this I knew and how it's now being confirmed. I'm an experiencer and a "void walker". I have something in each foot that emits rf signals, documented, and my family are hitchhiker effect targets. After decades of research I'm still pretty freaking clueless lol. I have theories based on religious texts and science but nothing tangible.

[@davidpolaczek3614]

If I was Lou and this guy tried to correct me on the word metabolism, I'd look right at him in the camera and say, that's why no one is interviewing you! Then I'd sign off

[@JulianJohnston919]

For someone to be "retired" he sure does talk like he's still employed.

[@artstrology]

It should be thought of , in the perspective of diverse skill sets among people. A million people play baseball, but only a handful are "Babes". A million scientists may study a certain , but only a handful make major discoveries. Among us as a species, we have extremely talented people with unique skill sets. If a person goes blind, their hearing develops. So, trying to teach this "remote viewing" in a military environment is not conducive to success. There is also a well known factor about this particular skill set, that has a built in ethics to it. For some people, if they speak about it, or try to apply it in ways that are blocked, lose the ability. It is both scientific and anti-scientific simultaneously. If you try to prove it, or win the lottery, it does not work.

[@helmutstransky3761]

Hahaha, we heard those excuses many times. Only one proven case would be enought on the other hand. That should not be too much too ask for, after all those years.

[@artstrology]

@@helmutstransky3761 Who is we ?

[@grandrapids57]

Only a cigar smoker would know that the slang for the burning portion is called "the cherry."

[@walterplessen1883]

Remote viewing through human beings via nanobots confirmed and coming.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: I just remote viewed this video. Whoa!

[@AvanaVana]

I am remote posting this reply to your comment

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@AvanaVana And I received your message through space and time.

[@isatousarr7044]

Remote viewing, commonly linked to parapsychology, has generated significant interest regarding its potential connections to quantum processes. Some theorists propose that principles of quantum mechanics, such as entanglement and non-locality, could offer a framework for understanding how information may be accessed or perceived from a distance without relying on conventional sensory input. This perspective suggests that consciousness could operate similarly to quantum particles, wherein information exists beyond the constraints of space and time. By exploring these connections, researchers may uncover deeper insights into the nature of consciousness and its relationship to the physical universe, though rigorous scientific investigation is essential to differentiate between metaphorical interpretations and empirical realities in this intriguing field.

[@laurabarber6697]

I appreciate what you are saying yet it keeps us stuck in the Left brain, hyper analytical perspective of: I can't accept this (remote viewing in this example) UNTIL I can explain it in tangible/ Newtonian perspective. Intangible experiences are not meant to be understood or explained from that perspective. We are already living a world of hi tech intangibles so why would/ should RV be any different - just because it is done without a technological device? We have moved on to a Quantum perspective and experiences. I have the ability and experience of using my 5 physical senses in very nonphysical ways. Remote viewing and psychometry to name a few. It's time to focus on the teaching of these abilities rather than wasting time getting bogged down on the theories and possible explanations of why they are able to be done. Do you have any "psychic" abilities or are you speaking about this from only an intellectual/ left brain perspective? It makes a difference.

[@brendawilliams8062]

One language in a multi language world kinda has elements it the future and elements of the past remote viewing in your hand. No brain waves involved yet

[@helmutstransky3761]

@@laurabarber6697 It makes no difference. You claim extraordinary abilities, proof them! What colour is my couch? You need location? Are GPS coordinates sufficient?

[@etc4xg]

"Some theorists" aka quacks lmfao I actually genuinely dare you to elucidate what in the hell any of this bullshit has to do with the measurement problem

[@brendawilliams8062]

@@isatousarr7044 The commuters do not commute themselves. Language feels like an instantaneous commute. Pictures are somewhat the same. Instantaneous commuting from a to b is not in just those two domains. It is the instantaneous that appears in retrospect as say. Brake dancing

[@jojogaming1013]

I thought he was wearing a pair of goofy-looking earrings at first.

[@leafybotanist8985]

Lue got all of his remote viewing info from Hal Putoff. Soooo, why are we just skipping over the critiques of Hal Putoff's methodology and the fact that attempts to replicate his experiments across 35 studies all failed to reproduce the results? Is it the other guys attempting to replicate that had methodology problems? Is there any attempt by Putoff to address the critiques of his own experiments? Those are the key questions that are NEVER asked.

[@herbertwest1419]

Don't worry he would find what to say - like how the papers that were released into the public were intended to misinform the public and that the bulk of the documents that show the truth of the matter are still under top secret clearance, and thats why you should buy Lue's latest book. The better question would be - why the rest of ufology "experts" are on board with RV and the people who peddle parapsychology and magic.

[@atzelepis1]

OK we need interviews from remoteviewers

[@benharrismagicstudio]

Remote viewing is a trick, a con. Geller introduced it to Puthoff in the 1970s, fooling him completely with the TRICK.

[@grandmotalk3564]

How did the cigar analogy not resonate with you?🧐

[@chillguy2758]

This guy trying to sell his book and leading us on

[@like-icecream]

👆

[@wingedhussar1453]

@@chillguy2758 if he didnt work for governwmbt before ppl would think hes a nut. Maybe he is who knows .how does he know all of this anyway jt seems like some of this sruff is just his own ideas

[@timb350]

You obviously have more than 5 fundamental senses. What happens when you close your eyes? Do you cease to exist? So right there is another 'sense'. The only question is...what are the capabilities of that 'sense'...and what are the dimensions of that sense. Currently there is absolutely no way to empirically adjudicate either of those questions...and the liklihood of that changing any time soon is not great.

[@daverector797]

Love you Curt ❤ no homosapian 😊

[@testsignupagain7449]

Americas industrialisation of the spiritual is an open letter to the universe. They will not enjoy the clapback

[@raoultesla2292]

Too bad there are no remote viewers. We would not have terrorist attacks or drug smuggling or human trafficking anymore. But, alas, all the honest soldier police psychics are retired.

[@larsonfamilyhouse]

Anyone can do remote viewing

[@stevenjohns-savage7024]

Thanks 👍😊

[@billymeyer7401]

Don't believe a word this guy said he has light balls fling in his house for 4 years and never video recording it 😂

[@blink5891]

That is an issue.

[@IvanKinkle]

Really? That’s your catalyst? How do you know he doesn’t have photo evidence? Let’s say he does, people like you would claim he likely faked it. So it’s just an endless circle.

[@jimmythornseed8605]

It happened while he was employed, so they may well have been confiscated.

[@786veronika]

Am doing a doc on my morning run / chant / pray where my Bluetooth is CUT OFF, there's a flying plane or something, first they called police, the police saw I was just working out, once 16 police cars came, other cars just come and try to get my wave, but now I use DL music and plugged in head phones, if anyone has any idea why? Or how? It would mean so much, they are in my parking lot and intercepts my Bluetooth from my car, I can see it playing but where?

[@sicqnuschannel4126]

Lol Lol Lol : so good at remote viewing they didn't saw the 09/11 coming.

[@bernardwolff8742]

It’s just hard to belief. I want to belief but… how is it that those in power don’t use it to foresee events and have the upper hand etc?!

[@stoneneils]

They might, but typically those in power don't even meditate. They rarely even eat healthy. Hell, many go trophy hunting!! How would they possibly believe in the paranormal.

[@HEYMIKE-h7s]

SOME TIMES my day dream turns into a hologram...AS IF I TOOK A PHOTO out of my fmemory file..LOOK AT IT..then be inside the photo looking around

[@rickproctor6693]

What ear buds are you using and is it just for the calls?

[@NewyorkezNYC]

Now he's been in RV too... what an impostor.