Ed Witten Challenges Lee Smolin's Theory
8:56
The SIMPLEST Layer Of String Theory
11:01
Free Will Vs. Determinism Worldview
11:03
Non-Human Encounters with Richard Dolan
17:03
How To Increase Your WILLPOWER
8:44
21 күн бұрын
The Universe is NOT a Computer
11:08
28 күн бұрын
Пікірлер
@EpicFantasyRPGOfficial2
@EpicFantasyRPGOfficial2 8 секунд бұрын
Disclosure - which has disclosed nothing of any value... Of UFOs... Which aren't... Nothing more than militarised secrets of earth technology, especially linked to energy production, which is immensely valuable and therefore will never be revealed. We all know much more about real nonhuman intelligences already than some of us realize since the real ones are daemons, jinn, elementals, devils and demons. Not "space aliens".
@gerry4b
@gerry4b 13 минут бұрын
A gifted teacher. The only cosmologist I’ve ever been able to follow.
@user-en9zo2ol4z
@user-en9zo2ol4z 14 минут бұрын
My personal belief is, that a third possibility exist with regard to disclosure. That is, a sufficient inertia will develop among the grassroots community, which is already happening, where the pressure upon the governments and other actors, i.e. the USAF etc, will drive more secrets to surface. It will be, as I often think of such things, like leather soled shoes wearing away on granite steps. Eventually, a wear pattern will become obvious. Already a number of weeks ago. The EU parliament held its inaugural meeting on UFOs, for as it turns out, despite the very low level of reporting, Europe has a higher rate of reports than the USA, which flies against the common perception insisted upon by the professional debunkers. At a certain time, possibly within my lifetime, a gradual insistence will grow from the people, at which point it will become part of the general political platforms of the major players. Even if only 5% of people report their UFO experiences, and they are investigated correctly, we stand a chance of figuring out what is happening. Go for it Curt, you do such a great job of elucidating reality via your select guests.
@mykota2417
@mykota2417 17 минут бұрын
We are approaching the consciousness of a dolphin recognising itself in a mirror.
@tuk7raz
@tuk7raz 21 минут бұрын
❤❤ Where is your nobility? Where is the honor? Where is the support? Where is the scientific interest and curiosity? BIG ERROR in measuring the Universe, black holes, dark energy,... Let me judge all this by the result of a direct experiment, gentlemen of physics Let's do the Michelson-Morley experiment on a school bus and determine the speed in a straight line - this is exactly the experiment Einstein dreamed of. Perhaps we will see the postulates: “Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and Dominant gravitational fields control the speed of light in a vacuum.” There is a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, two coils with optical fiber, where the light in each arm travels 18,000 meters, without exceeding the parameters of 0.4/0.4/0.4 meters and mass - 4 kg.
@dixztube
@dixztube 22 минут бұрын
why does there seem like there's always something off w/ ufo folks. i'm w/ them but so many come off as kinda grifty lol
@buckanderson3520
@buckanderson3520 23 минут бұрын
We can define a foot in inches but not an inch in feet. We can only define one thing by it's relationship or difference to another. But what about something so small in size, mass, or energy that there is no way to determine it's exact relationship or difference to something we do know. We could say that the larger is equal to a certain number of the smaller but only if we have a way to determine the value of the smaller. If the only way to probe the properties of the smaller is by using something larger then the size,mass, or energy of the larger will obscure the properties of the smaller. So how can we define the smallest things that exist if we have no way to compare it? Is it possible that we think something has no mass when it actually has a mass that is too small to define because anything we would use to measure it's mass obscures it's mass from us? It could be that at the very smallest scales we have to assume a value because it is impossible for us to measure.
@ericbufo4050
@ericbufo4050 27 минут бұрын
“No more UFO stuff..” looks at bank accounts…. One more
@rgarcia8876
@rgarcia8876 27 минут бұрын
Why would the big bang expansion be cone shaped and not spherical?
@mikehoman7351
@mikehoman7351 33 минут бұрын
This is not correct - Mach's principal only has an effect on what is considered still or moving but not on rotation - even though rotating frames are discussed in Mach's principal, it is a misconception
@user-en9zo2ol4z
@user-en9zo2ol4z 35 минут бұрын
Hi Curt, you have one of the best shows on Ute-Ube, in my opinion. For this reason, I am so glad that you have not withdrawn entirely from the UFO topic. At present, the number of true physicists (the ones who investigate mysteries, instead of just mystically knowing the answer) is increasing fairly rapidly. Certainly compared to how it was for perhaps 60 years? Science is needed for this, for we have enough charlatans and carpet baggers trolling and sponging off people's desire to believe, shall we say? The UFO phenomenon is very real, as are the concomitant Woo, or High Strangeness effects. I have experienced them myself.
@craigjeffrey3236
@craigjeffrey3236 48 минут бұрын
Of course Richard is correct...Just remember that those from the higher realms have more power than the US Govt and the more they push war and the consquences of it, the more 'an intervention' is likely. Disclosure won't happen by the way in which humanity thinks of it (Via Govt), it will happen right in front of our faces for all to see....What's being seen everywhere around the world right now is the curtain raiser for the main event....
@slo3337
@slo3337 51 минут бұрын
I've always believed the "singularities" were an artifact of the math being used and are not real.
@udolehmann5432
@udolehmann5432 55 минут бұрын
Warum nicht mit deutschem Untertitel ? ☹️
@udolehmann5432
@udolehmann5432 58 минут бұрын
Es ist historisch gesehen schon komisch = Albert Einstein, als er in Amerika war, hatte meistens nur 1 oder 2 Assistenten obwohl er wesentlich mehr gebraucht hätte für die komplizierten Berechnungen mit Tensoren, er wurde in diesem Sinne nur benutzt um mehr gute Leute nach Amerika zu holen, meiner Meinung nach ein schwerer Fehler der damaligen Zeit. Wieviel Menschen arbeiten an der Stringtheorie ? In diesem Zusammenhang auch = viele sagen, sie hätten die Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie verstanden. Warum gibt es dann, bis heute, kein allgemeines Lösungsverfahren für die Gleichungen der ART ? Warum wurden die Fragen welche Gödel dazu stellte, bis heute, nicht beantwortet ?
@efsmiley1995
@efsmiley1995 59 минут бұрын
Welcome back, Curt. We do really value your work and perspective. Thank you.👍
@gregorysagegreene
@gregorysagegreene Сағат бұрын
Can't wait to see The Big Bang, and have a new Mirror of science re-progressing from after the Seventies. Knock down the Jenga Tower!
@Lolls-99
@Lolls-99 Сағат бұрын
They’re demons not aliens.
@joannasarcamedes8191
@joannasarcamedes8191 Сағат бұрын
The only thing ive ever seen were two black triangle things flying through the air one late afternoon as i wss walking into work for night shift in a bakery . This was in north Denver. I for some reason didnt think much of it at that moment , not sure why like i didnt want to make a big deal out of it.
@nexgen1701
@nexgen1701 Сағат бұрын
No I for one don’t agree that the public should not know everything all at once, one of the reasons for the mistrust at their highest of the government is that they are hiding what we know to be the truth, if it does not happen society will collapse, we are seeing this right now!
@bentationfunkiloglio
@bentationfunkiloglio Сағат бұрын
Uhggggg…. I enjoy dispassionate discussions of this topic. However, starting by assuming a grand government conspiracy, isn’t useful or interesting.
@PlanetJimmer
@PlanetJimmer Сағат бұрын
What Richard talks about is SO relevant - disclosure will and should make us question our institutions which will lead us to completely rethink how we structure them.
@Jontheinternet
@Jontheinternet Сағат бұрын
Ancient cultures say it's like an accordion. Expanding and retracting in cycles
@anomaly2990
@anomaly2990 Сағат бұрын
Bengali?
@anomaly2990
@anomaly2990 Сағат бұрын
Just because they are human "looking" doesn't make them an alien from another planet. Perhaps they really are human or perhaps angelic beings.
@terryforsythe8083
@terryforsythe8083 Сағат бұрын
What happens if the ability to tap into an unlimited amount of energy falls into the hands of terrorists? The weapons derived from limitless energy would dwarf the most powerful nuclear weapons. Could that be a reason for the coverup, assuming there is one?
@twoandahalfstars2987
@twoandahalfstars2987 Сағат бұрын
wtf ...face the day...play with my cat????? again what does he know wtf??
@simesaid
@simesaid Сағат бұрын
Here's a proof for why there's no such thing as a "slow" or "no" disclosure policy. As Richard himself says, official news of alien visitation would be "profound". Ergo, the President to officially announce such a thing would be forever famous for having announced just that... such an announcement would also effectively supersede, and thus relegate into obscurity, any other (negative) details of their term in office. As Richard also says, any such announcement would be "incredibly disruptive". This is akin to a state of war, as entire industries, government policies, and indeed, the national psyche, are moved to drastic change. And we know from history that populations are loathe to change governments during times of national emergency. Ergo, we have a situation whereby a president can both effectively eradicate any negative effects of their term in office, and also secure for themselves a positive, heroic, historic image for their presidency. Moreover, such an announcement would radically alter the entire political landscape, and effectively give the incumbent government a second term in office as this reorganisation took place... But I guess politicians _never_ want fame or re-election, do they? I'm personally agnostic about alien visitations and UAPs. They might exist, or they might not. I simply don't know. Furthermore, I quite like Richard, he seems like a quite reasonable and indeed likeable bloke. My truck does not lie with him _per se._ Rather, I simply don't like lazy analysis. And when people, _any_ people, don't know something, it's then all too easy to just throw the unknown into a "conspiracy" theory. Generally, this will then also be a conspiracy from which the accused party cannot ever hope to recuse themselves. "It's not true!" says a government spokesperson. "Yes, well they _would_ say that, wouldn't they!" comes the response... game over. It's just intellectually lazy to assert that your lack of information _must_ result from a conspiracy wherein that information is being _kept_ from you. And it _must_ be being kept from you, because otherwise you would _have_ it, wouldn't you? Perhaps though, just perhaps, you don't have the information because _nobody_ has the information. It's Occam's Razor. The solution that contains the least number of assumptions is almost always the accurate one. So, either hundreds of thousands of ordinary people, all with different and competing interests and ideologies, that are employed by dozens of different government agencies, over the course of dozens of administrations, and all of which hold competing interests and different political goals and party allegiances, all of these hundreds of thousands of moving, fluid, very human - and thus inherently irrational - individual parts, have remained _completely_ united in their drive to protect... well, _something,_ for, well... _reasons..._ Or, maybe... just _maybe,_ nobody knows a fucking thing. Because _nobody has all the fucking information!_ *Nobody. Has. All. The. Information.* Which is the simpler theory? Which is the more likely true scenario here? I'll let you decide. Edit: I'm _not,_ and have _never_ been, employed by the US government. Or by _any_ government. Moreover, I hold _no_ partisan affiliations, and in fact, I don't even live in, nor have _ever_ even visited, the US. I'm just an ordinary (retired) bloke from Australia... And I don't owe _anybody_ anything... anything _whatsoever._ I'm just interested in the _truth,_ and lazy analysis - throwing things into the "I don't know, so it must be a conspiracy" too hard basket - doesn't help with finding the truth... it simply _hinders_ it! Have a great day, everyone!
@MOHAWKris8
@MOHAWKris8 Сағат бұрын
IAMWEAREYOUARE
@buckanderson3520
@buckanderson3520 Сағат бұрын
The universe is expanding but the cosmological horizon, the part of the universe we can observe or influence, is shrinking. Doesn't that also mean that the percentage of observable space our local space represents is growing? Welcome to the incredible expanding yet shrinking yet expanding universe! So is our size relative to size of the universe shrinking or growing or both or neither?
@gregorysagegreene
@gregorysagegreene Сағат бұрын
What if there are different laws of nature in all of the Islands of Space beyond the observability of each other. A better candidate for multiality ... 'The Multitudiverse'.
@vhfarrell81
@vhfarrell81 2 сағат бұрын
How does Turok’s new theory compare to Penrose’s conformal cyclical cosmology? It sounds like they have a lot in common.
@robertlamantin5088
@robertlamantin5088 2 сағат бұрын
I'd love to read "Primacy of doubt" from Tim Palmer, but unfortunately for me, it's not translated in french language. My english is decent enough to practice daily conversations, with topics like "What's your favorite color ?" or "what do you think of Trump ?" (this last one is easy, just one word makes the job), but to understand what sir Palmer has to say about our world, well, I will not make it. I'm sad.
@rooruffneck
@rooruffneck 2 сағат бұрын
Can anybody tell me more about 36?
@gregorysagegreene
@gregorysagegreene Сағат бұрын
Well, it ain't 42.
@OzGoober
@OzGoober 2 сағат бұрын
38:18 "There is something this topic that is not right man, There's something about it." 💯
@RaulieAbreu-xs4kb
@RaulieAbreu-xs4kb 2 сағат бұрын
Inner space is what we should talk about. Ever seen a piece of gorgonzola cheese under a microscope? It's like Aliens vs predator.
@tevis190
@tevis190 2 сағат бұрын
@1:05:00 Quantum tunneling: nuclei decay is always accompanied with an antiparticle. For neutrons, their decay half life is longer when antineutrinos are not capable of reaching nuclei (eg. extrasolar rates). Is the antiparticle causative? Is the antiparticle coming from the anti-universe? Don't antiparticles travel backwards in time?
@OzGoober
@OzGoober 2 сағат бұрын
It's not naive to think Aliens aren't self destructive. Imagine having the technology to travel among the star and come here to mutilate cattle. Really? Only children would think so.
@erictilton5127
@erictilton5127 2 сағат бұрын
what, then, is dark matter in this framework
@gregorysagegreene
@gregorysagegreene Сағат бұрын
He said it was heavy neutrinos.
@321lub
@321lub 2 сағат бұрын
youtube.com/@SwaruuOficial?si=NX7M58KkSR0j5-Zm
@DrakeLarson-js9px
@DrakeLarson-js9px 2 сағат бұрын
Curt, in my opinion Tim Palmer, with confidence abides by conventional wisdom... (as every respectable tenured professor should do to comfortably maintain a friendly social standing in academia)...But what about Mary Fowlers geophysics PREM chart that is a prelude into dark energy?...We have an 800KG gorilla in the room that is neglected in this 1hour and half video... but like Tim's questions and answers.
@Urfman
@Urfman 3 сағат бұрын
Curt jumping back on 😊 This rabbit hole doesn’t end until we force it to end
@TheoriesofEverything
@TheoriesofEverything 3 сағат бұрын
Hey all, join TOEmail at www.curtjaimungal.org
@gregorysagegreene
@gregorysagegreene 3 сағат бұрын
Bjorn Ekeberg's 'Jenga Tower'.
@akytable
@akytable 3 сағат бұрын
Anyone invoking a cosmological principle to explain angular momentum loses my respect immediately. Particles have linear momentum. Aggregated bodies have angular momentum derived from the linear momenta of their constituent particles. End of story.
@carparkmartian2193
@carparkmartian2193 3 сағат бұрын
The disclosure must start and progress faster than the rate that agi can reverse engineer the new physics for itself. This will very likely be within 12 to 18 months. To me that is the core reason that the disclosure has started. The US seek to control the release of that information to control the narrative. It can't control the narrative with agi doing it first. They can try to control agi version and capability release but the US is not the only party heading rapidly towards agi. So the reveal is on its way regardless.
@MrVonBastard
@MrVonBastard 3 сағат бұрын
There WILL DISCLOSE or NO MORE MONEY!!! We The People run this country, not the Deep State. And since they've forgotten this truth, we're going to remind them with Fire, Blood, and Tears.
@jimmykelly2809
@jimmykelly2809 3 сағат бұрын
I got $500 on no disclosure