Punt or No Punt?! Jarretman's INSANE Bluffs Put Me in the BLENDER?! Part 2

After a crazy part 1, Jarretman is back to see if he can secure an illustrious victory in Punt or No Punt! With all hands selected being 'unsolvable', it made for a very interesting ride! We have 4 more hands to go through today and they are all absolute bangers as they were in Part 1.
If you missed Part 1, make sure you check that out below:
• Punt or No Punt?! Jarr...
Make sure you stay right through to the end, as hand number 7 absolutely rivals hand 3 from last week in terms of the nuttiest hand I've ever analysed. You can actually see my brain whittle to dust as I try to figure out what's going on, even forgetting some of the most basic poker principles along the way. This is what the series is all about!
If you haven't heard of Jarretman, or you have but haven't watched his content before, it's without doubt some of the most valuable poker content available on the internet, with play & explains up to 2knl.
Make sure to check out Jarretman's KZbin channel here: / seirnflow26
I want to say another HUGE thanks to Jarretman for coming on the show. I never imagined I could get someone like him and my other guests on the channel, and it's so awesome to get such crazy hands from such sick players!
I'll also be running a new Community Edition of Punt or No Punt in the near future where members of the Discord can share their hands! This time I'll look to get a guest on with me to go over the hands. I'll also be on the lookout for my next guest, but it seems like I'll be hard pressed to get better than what I've managed to luck myself into recently!
If you enjoy Punt or No Punt, make sure to subscribe to the channel so you don't miss more in the future.
Thanks again for all the support!
TWITCH: / eastyyy22
DISCORD: / discord
INSTAGRAM: / eastyyy22poker
TWITTER: / eastyyy22
888poker: bit.ly/eastyyy888
UPSWING POKER: bit.ly/eastyyy-upswing
POKER SCIENTIST: www.poker-scientist.com (code eastyyy22 for 20% off)
POKER TRACKER 4: bit.ly/eastyyy-pt4
EMAIL: [e-mail]
Thanks for watching!
#jarretman #puntornopunt #pokeranalysis

[@Jarretman]

almost made it :(

[@eastyyy22]

Could have gone either way! Thanks a lot for playing man, epic hands! Legend.

[@adventurek6734]

When are your new vids

[@felixmaierhofer5026]

Jarret such a savage showing these insane bluffs on punt or no punt for future EV to always get paid off in the future while secretly never bluffing

[@eastyyy22]

😅 the long con

[@Jakobos123]

I've been looking forward to this one for WEEKS! So much value in these videos, let's go!

[@eastyyy22]

Thanks a lot mate, wait no longer!

[@Michaelperry1985]

Great series Gentlemen! This was excellent

[@eastyyy22]

Thanks mate!

[@no.1fan284]

Most awesome content on KZbin! Thank you Sir Legend's

[@jackungerer1702]

This is the best content on KZbin right now. Thanks dads!

[@eastyyy22]

Appreciate that lad! Glad you enjoyed.

[@v.v.7337]

@@eastyyy22 who's ur dad?

[@Mikkem20]

Two of my favourite channels together, got to love it! LFG

[@eastyyy22]

cheers mate, enjoy!

[@Mikkem20]

@@eastyyy22 bean vs jarret heads up challenge next thank you ;)

[@eastyyy22]

@@Mikkem20 internet would explode

[@Mikkem20]

@@eastyyy22BTO vs GTO showdowd for the ages

[@bernardocaula371]

Great video and great series! Please invite jarretman for future videos. Ty for the gold content

[@samu5381]

literally the best free studying content out there

[@eastyyy22]

thanks mate!

[@jamesalner9069]

Goated series

[@eastyyy22]

Thanks James lad. Wonder if it outperform my upcoming Cyber Dragon play & explains.

[@PeterChien189]

never folding to Jarret again

[@eastyyy22]

reasonable

[@DrSuage]

Gr8 stuff man. This is such an excellent series, and instructional as well as being very hilarious. Sorry for trolling you on stream ;)

[@eastyyy22]

Thanks a lot man! Who are you on my stream 😅

[@michaelquinn8]

That last hand its clear all bluffs must contain a 9 to block the 99. Given that we have 3 combos of 99 and half a combo of 56s and 67s each and 1 combos of A6s for value totaling 5 combos we need 2.5 combos of bluffs to stay in balance. For me, that makes it 80% of A9s as the villain will not have AK here given preflop action but will have a bunch of KQ which our Q kicker is blocking. This skewings Villains range into having more 6x and 99. The same goes for J9s and 9Ts. 89s blocks his straight draws.

[@daverogers4195]

At 25.00 does villain open limp KQd ever here though? K9 DIMS would make tonn of sense though ? Which obv folds river

[@EricSmyth4Christ]

Thoughts on making it like $100 on the first hand instead of a shove? Still folds out 1 pair hands

[@onebignonfish]

Good video mate

[@eastyyy22]

Thanks mate

[@persianprince4689]

Great video

[@eastyyy22]

thanks mate

[@zoltancanji1148]

A5s for me a genius play in my eyes, and thiss call is mandatory but i think we get alot of folds here

[@FefeLeVrai]

I actually like the river bluff too. Opponent's range is very wide, has a lot of 1 pair and 2 pair. But the flop x/r with no fold equity against a rec is a punt.

[@Stefanburakov]

Yes but donk 33% turn would be even better imo

[@patricklawler6564]

Have to watch this for the brain melt

[@eastyyy22]

you won't be let down

[@ratoverboard]

Bit of support for the vid

[@eastyyy22]

Much appreciated!

[@ds54ds5sd5sd5]

When some tuff spot happening, my real time solving process is 50:00

[@upbeatsarcastic8217]

That last hand was a beauty - but have you ever tried to bluff a Zynga reg off of bottom quads at NL250,000,000? That's a real fucking punt.

[@eastyyy22]

Hahaha we'll have to get one of those hands on some day. Thanks for watching lad.

[@ignaciopiedra1598]

Jarretman has a deep understanding of the theory behind poker and a strong mindset. When he says: "If he have it he have it and just pay the man his money" he is saying fuck you because I am so well balanced that youre pretty screwed on the long run. I ♥️ this guy. And I ♥️this video.

[@eastyyy22]

Completely true mate! All successful players I know have this attitude.

[@v.v.7337]

OMG the BB is aweful ... ahahahahahahha

[@eastyyy22]

😅

[@Yessirdo]

What do you mean all in ?! 😂

[@eastyyy22]

Could be talking about any of the hands here mate 😅

[@burningbend]

i kinda hated the first and last two but thought the middle was good too but like easty, i can't beat 10nl

[@eastyyy22]

I've heard that easty fella is on an upswing at 10nl

[@burningbend]

@@eastyyy22 he wishes

[@MichaelCourtneyDub]

Love a good bluff, me. LFG!

[@eastyyy22]

cheers mate!

[@nat2r]

LETS GOOO

[@Roxz.1]

Yessssss

[@eastyyy22]

You want it you get it

[@danijelkucurski2180]

Last hand x range river. And x raise all in with Kx and 6x

[@eastyyy22]

it's that easy

[@danijelkucurski2180]

@@eastyyy22 yes in similar spot ect bb vs Btn srp, it aplyes same logic. You want to forse him to call for chop with Kx

[@eastyyy22fangetoutmypot71]

eastyyPunt HOLD HARD!

[@eastyyy22]

[@jrm8206]

Nice.

[@eastyyy22]

Thanks mate

[@sinsmiletv2840]

lois

[@deinemutter4133]

What does jarretman mean with pushing equity. He says it a lot

[@consumer61]

I was wondering about this as well. I think he means playing (aggressively) with hands which have higher relative equity and thus "pushing" them in an effort to realise this equity. Maybe somebody else has a better understanding?

[@ignaciopiedra1598]

@@consumer61 I think he is talking about equity denial.

[@consumer61]

@@ignaciopiedra1598 oh, as in "pushing out" equity from weak-middling hands which fold?

[@ignaciopiedra1598]

@@consumer61 every hand before the river has some equity and when you make those hands to fold you denied the equity that otherwise they can realize and beat you. Maybe I am wrong I dont know. First time I hear the concept of pushing equity.

[@trueteller3239]

i think it means your hand has enough equity vs villain's range that you can raise get it in

[@azBreaak]

support

[@eastyyy22]

Ty lad!

[@FefeLeVrai]

Pretty weird logic in the 1st hand. Starts by saying you shouldn't cbet a lot on this board, which is true, but then proceeds to checkraise which you should be doing even less. Cbet = range advantage, which he still has even though it's close. Checkraise = nut advantage, which he definitely does not have.

[@eastyyy22]

Fefe comfirmed better than Jarretman.

[@FefeLeVrai]

@@eastyyy22 Just ran this board in GTO Wizard, it is a range check, and low frequency checkraise. But this comes from the solver assuming a big range advantage from the IP player, which is true if your opponent plays GTO but against a rec who calls pre with any 2 cards the opposite is true, PFR has the range advantage in practice. This also comes from the solver assuming that the IP player bets 100% of his range when checked to, which is also definitely not the case in practice, but that would justify checkraises even when you have way fewer good hands if opponent bets everything. This is a spot where GTO and exploitative differ massively. Jarret played correct GTO, but GTO calculated for a different range for his opponent than his actual one.

[@BenjaminRaven]

:)

[@jamesreynoso4447]

Most of these positions it makes it pretty obvious you are shoving as almost an angle lol id call u j because of the player type

[@DAZE192]

hi

[@TheBadZolik]

If he's trying to fold out one pair in the first hand, why not just donk 85 bucks?

[@seanmccafferty2296]

I barely understand any of this lol

[@eastyyy22]

it's not your fault lad 😅

[@sneakytucky]

for the algo

[@eastyyy22]

[@mariocardoso291]

u should not bluff a missed flush draw

[@pudelinocacalat2951]

Huge huge punts, I can't even watch this through to the end hearing so much copium. The first episode was great but the second part is only guesstimates against mega whales. Even the reasoning is completely wrong. First hand it should be a small cbet if he thinks he has any 2 because the fish won't tax him enough. With 2 overs the check-call is perfect. The river donk is ridiculous. A lot of villain range on a 4-to-a-straight board after 3 bets in will be at least 2 pairs, if not a straight. Second hand, it's at least an ace, but it might aswell be a flush all day long. If he had a spade in hand, I could buy this but what's with this overbluffing against megastations. Third and went on like forever when it's the most ridiculous bluff ever, turning a perfectly showdown-able hand into a readless bluff. Obviously you cannot dictate what hands they come up with but Jarretman promised to deliver with unsolvable hands. Instead the episode turned into : river scary, fish has any2, im allin.

[@eastyyy22]

Thought it was fun tbh but each to their own. Last hand is against literally one of the best players in the world so it's a shame you didn't see that if that is your preference.

[@ghostofstuungar7965]

Nick the concept of this show is bad for your ego