Q&A About the Universe with Top Physicist Neil Turok

Welcome to Rethinking the Foundations brought to you by Curt Jaimungal at Theories of Everything. Today, Professor Neil Turok answers questions from the audience! This is Part 2 to Neil's Rethinking the Foundations episode. Part 1 can be seen here: • Rethinking the Foundat...
Become a KZbin Member Here:
/ @theoriesofeverything
Patreon: / curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!)
Listen on Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b9...
Join TOEmail at www.curtjaimungal.org
Links:
- Rethinking the Foundations debut episode w/ Neil Turok - • Rethinking the Foundat...
- Bernardo Kastrup solo episode - • Escaping the Illusion:...
- Neil Turok solo episode - • The (Simple) Theory Th...
Support TOE:
- Patreon: / curtjaimungal (early access to ad-free audio episodes!)
- Crypto: tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE
- PayPal: tinyurl.com/paypalTOE
- TOE Merch: tinyurl.com/TOEmerch
Follow TOE:
- NEW Get my 'Top 10 TOEs' PDF + Weekly Personal Updates: www.curtjaimungal.org
- Instagram: / theoriesofeverythingpod
- TikTok: / theoriesofeverything_
- Twitter: / toewithcurt
- Discord Invite: / discord
- iTunes: podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast...
- Pandora: pdora.co/33b9lfP
- Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b9...
- Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: / theoriesofeverything
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @theoriesofeverything
#science #physics

[@TheoriesofEverything]

Watch Part 1 Here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y5jamaSjhdaFopY Listen on Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e Join TOEmail at www.curtjaimungal.org

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

String theory might be correct, or rather a tiny piece of a more comprehensive set of dynamics. In a fluidic environment dominated by quantized vortices (h circumference lengths for example) when quantized vortices orient in the same direction they form open tubes and closed tubes, with a quantized length of (at the planck scale this would be 2ℏ*n length, because (ℏ = radius) of (h = circumference) therefore (2ℏ = diameter of the angular motion flux capacity, which is the true length of quantized energy lengths, while the ℏ represents the reduced relative action [relative to a observer moving against the velocity of that current of half a quantized vortex])). Oscillations travel the lengths of these tubes (2ℏ*n/c), the speed in which these oscillation travel is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the loop itself, 2ℏ*n/(c - Ls). However this is the relative effective speed a oscillation travels the length of the loop, rather than the frequency (which would be the number of oscillations inhabiting the loop), which may be more about what string theory is, as a lesser fundamental theory that emerges above this one. There is also other factors, involving closed and open vortex tubes, where angular drag forces open loops to move around each other, or open loops to move in and out of each other, which further complicates these dynamics till my ape head explodes.

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

Correction from last post - String theory might be true at some level, but it represents only a small piece of a larger set of more fundamental processes. Quantized vortices that form open and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the foundational basis of the more emergent oscillating string process. At the fundamental scale, ℎ represents the circumference, ℏ the radius, and 2ℏ the diameter of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). The ℏ value is the reduced Planck constant and serves as the relative reduced action-the linear radius reduction of ℎ-as part of an angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta. Essentially, half of the quanta is moving in the opposite direction of the other half. The diameter 2ℏ provides the linear spatial length, contrasting with the action length ℎ and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open or closed tubes. The action-based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is given by ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐, where the circumference ℎ is the travel length of action, not the spatial length occupied by the angular motion quanta, which is 2ℏ. Therefore, the true length of the open or closed tube is 2ℏ⋅𝑛, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube. Hence, the correct travel time considering this inverse proportionality is ℎ⋅𝑛/(𝑐−𝑠), where 𝑠 is the speed of the tube. Additionally, the tubes exhibit secondary properties: open tubes will orbit each other due to angular action, and closed tubes will move in and out of each other due to angular action. This dynamic interaction defines a specific set of kinetics and oscillations within the system, which are not fully understood yet. Fundamentally, we are not dealing with wave functions directly; instead, wave functions are secondary emergent processes resulting from continuous motion undergoing action. There are two types of energy to consider: -Continuous angular motion flux, where energy grows with circumference length in a quantized angular motion environment. -Kinetic oscillations, where energy grows with frequency in a quantized angular motion environment. Wave functions cannot exist without angular motion quanta. It is possible that they depend on each other to exist recursively. While there might be a smaller granular scale than 2ℏ diameter length, this is currently unknown. Therefore, from our current understanding, angular motion is more fundamental than wave functions. Continuous motion flow with directionality differential seems more fundamental based on the equations and observations.

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

My post keeps disappearing oddly, the censorship is to pervasive. String theory might be true at some level, but it represents only a small piece of a larger set of more fundamental processes. Quantized vortices that form open and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the foundational basis of the more emergent oscillating string process. At the fundamental scale, ℎ represents the circumference, ℏ the radius, and 2ℏ the diameter of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). The ℏ value is the reduced Planck constant and serves as the relative reduced action-the linear radius reduction of ℎ-as part of an angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta. Essentially, half of the quanta is moving in the opposite direction of the other half. The diameter 2ℏ provides the linear spatial length, contrasting with the action length ℎ and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open or closed tubes. The action-based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is given by ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐, where the circumference ℎ is the travel length of action, not the spatial length occupied by the angular motion quanta, which is 2ℏ. Therefore, the true length of the open or closed tube is 2ℏ⋅𝑛, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube. Hence, the correct travel time considering this inverse proportionality is ℎ⋅𝑛/(𝑐−𝑠), where 𝑠 is the speed of the tube. Additionally, the tubes exhibit secondary properties: open tubes will orbit each other due to angular action, and closed tubes will move in and out of each other due to angular action. This dynamic interaction defines a specific set of kinetics and oscillations within the system, which are not fully understood yet. Fundamentally, we are not dealing with wave functions directly; instead, wave functions are secondary emergent processes resulting from continuous motion undergoing action. There are two types of energy to consider: -Continuous angular motion flux, where energy grows with circumference length in a quantized angular motion environment. -Kinetic oscillations, where energy grows with frequency in a quantized angular motion environment. Wave functions cannot exist without angular motion quanta. It is possible that they depend on each other to exist recursively. While there might be a smaller granular scale than 2ℏ diameter length, this is currently unknown. Therefore, from our current understanding, angular motion is more fundamental than wave functions. Continuous motion flow with directionality differential seems more fundamental based on the equations and observations.

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

I would like to make a suggestion since you have me the master of the Universe in your comment section what you should do is after you release an episode and I get to leave my string of commentary then what you should do is have them do the Q&A after the episode has released to the public that way the Q&A can really get down to the meat and potatoes... this way I get to counter any claims and then they get to see the counters to the claims that they made from me and that way they can see whether they need to adjust their point of view and how they should answer the Q&A... and you can also pretend like the Q&A was already videotaped and afterwards it was released but it can be released after that way all the commentary of me and the rest of the audience can be taken into consideration...

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

@@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler :) Good points, that would be awesome if the community could talk to each other in that way. The censorship and the structure of the comment section makes it hard to have a conversation where people understand where each other is coming from. After all, it's supposed to be a social media company, which is what it markets itself as. Maybe the government could stack billion dolar fines against KZbin every month till it begins marketing itself in the way it operates, instead of falsely marketing itself as a social media company, it's not really behaving that way, and it's harvest personal data to drive wars and conflict with recommendation algorithms to increase it's attention based ad revenue business model.

[@millatron2292]

Man I love Neil Turok's brain. What a treasure!

[@occultpowertothepeople]

One of the great science interviews. Beautiful.

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

Check it. String theory might be true at some level, but it represents only a small piece of a larger set of more fundamental processes. Quantized vortices that form open and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the foundational basis of the more emergent oscillating string process. At the fundamental scale, ℎ represents the circumference, ℏ the radius, and 2ℏ the diameter of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). The ℏ value is the reduced Planck constant and serves as the relative reduced action-the linear radius reduction of ℎ-as part of an angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta. Essentially, half of the quanta is moving in the opposite direction of the other half. The diameter 2ℏ provides the linear spatial length, contrasting with the action length ℎ and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open or closed tubes. The action-based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is given by ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐, where the circumference ℎ is the travel length of action, not the spatial length occupied by the angular motion quanta, which is 2ℏ. Therefore, the true length of the open or closed tube is 2ℏ⋅𝑛, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube. Hence, the correct travel time considering this inverse proportionality is ℎ⋅𝑛/(𝑐−𝑠), where 𝑠 is the speed of the tube. Additionally, the tubes exhibit secondary properties: open tubes will orbit each other due to angular action, and closed tubes will move in and out of each other due to angular action. This dynamic interaction defines a specific set of kinetics and oscillations within the system, which are not fully understood yet. Fundamentally, we are not dealing with wave functions directly; instead, wave functions are secondary emergent processes resulting from continuous motion undergoing action. There are two types of energy to consider: -Continuous angular motion flux, where energy grows with circumference length in a quantized angular motion environment. -Kinetic oscillations, where energy grows with frequency in a quantized angular motion environment. Wave functions cannot exist without angular motion quanta. It is possible that they depend on each other to exist recursively. While there might be a smaller granular scale than 2ℏ diameter length, this is currently unknown. Therefore, from our current understanding, angular motion is more fundamental than wave functions. Continuous motion flow with directionality differential seems more fundamental based on the equations and observations.

[@dmand1111]

Time traveling wormholes. I dig it ​@@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu

[@tevis190]

Amazing description of the cutting edge of spacetime physics, Thank you Neil and Curt. Neil is just so much more articulate in explaining this stuff compared to other scientists.

[@Mikeduffey_]

Absolutely love Neil! So cool to hear him discuss these ideas

[@brandonb5075]

“Tamper” with the constants/knowns all you want sir, they need reshuffling. I don’t know if it’s Neil’s commitment to the “real”, or what…but his presentations always seem to make sense even though what he is saying is way over my head. Thanks for the knowledge and history gentlemen. 🤙🏼✌🏼😊

[@MaxPower-vg4vr]

The noncommutative standard model is a fascinating and promising area of research that combines ideas from particle physics, quantum field theory, and noncommutative geometry. It represents a bold attempt to unify the fundamental forces of nature and to provide a more complete and satisfying description of the physical world at the smallest scales. The standard model of particle physics, which describes the properties and interactions of the fundamental particles that make up matter and energy, has been incredibly successful in explaining a wide range of experimental data and observations. However, it is known to have several important limitations and shortcomings, such as its inability to incorporate gravity and its reliance on a large number of free parameters that must be determined experimentally. The noncommutative standard model seeks to address these limitations by replacing the classical spacetime continuum with a noncommutative space, in which the coordinates do not necessarily commute with each other. This means that the order in which measurements are performed can affect the outcomes, leading to a range of new and exotic physical phenomena. The basic idea behind the noncommutative standard model is to replace the classical fields and particles of the standard model with their noncommutative counterparts, which are described by mathematical objects called spectral triples. A spectral triple consists of three main components: 1. A Hilbert space, which represents the space of quantum states of the system. 2. An algebra of operators acting on the Hilbert space, which represents the observables of the system. 3. A Dirac operator, which encodes the geometry of the noncommutative space and determines the dynamics of the system. By choosing a suitable spectral triple, it is possible to construct a noncommutative version of the standard model that reproduces all of the known particles and interactions, while also providing a natural framework for incorporating gravity and other physical phenomena. One of the key features of the noncommutative standard model is the presence of new particles and interactions that are not present in the classical standard model. For example, the noncommutative version of the Higgs boson, which is responsible for giving mass to the other particles, has a more complex structure and behavior than its classical counterpart. Similarly, the noncommutative version of the strong nuclear force, which binds quarks together to form protons and neutrons, has a richer and more intricate structure than in the classical case. This could potentially lead to new insights into the nature of confinement and other important aspects of quantum chromodynamics. Another important aspect of the noncommutative standard model is its relationship to quantum gravity. In the classical standard model, gravity is described by Einstein's theory of general relativity, which is based on a smooth and continuous spacetime manifold. However, this description breaks down at very small scales, where quantum effects become important. The noncommutative standard model provides a natural way to incorporate quantum gravity by replacing the classical spacetime manifold with a noncommutative space. This leads to a range of new physical effects and phenomena, such as the presence of a minimal length scale and the possible existence of extra dimensions. To fully explore the implications and predictions of the noncommutative standard model, it is necessary to develop a range of new mathematical tools and techniques. This is where the infinitesimal monadological framework could potentially play a key role. By studying the noncommutative spaces and spectral triples that arise in the noncommutative standard model using the tools of homotopy theory, cohomology, and other advanced mathematical techniques, we may be able to gain new insights into the structure and behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales. For example, by computing the cohomology groups of the noncommutative spaces associated with the noncommutative standard model, we may be able to define new topological invariants that could shed light on the nature of quantum gravity and the possible existence of extra dimensions. Similarly, by studying the homotopy theory of the spectral triples associated with the noncommutative standard model, we may be able to define new algebraic and geometric structures that could help to elucidate the relationships between the different particles and forces of nature. Of course, much work remains to be done to fully develop and exploit these ideas in practice. The noncommutative standard model is still a relatively new and speculative area of research, and there are many technical and conceptual challenges that must be overcome in order to make progress. However, the potential rewards are enormous. If successful, the noncommutative standard model could provide a truly unified and comprehensive description of the physical world, incorporating all of the known particles and forces of nature into a single, elegant mathematical framework. Moreover, by bringing together ideas and techniques from a wide range of different fields, from particle physics and quantum field theory to noncommutative geometry and homotopy theory, the noncommutative standard model represents an exciting and promising example of the kind of interdisciplinary research that is necessary to tackle some of the deepest and most fundamental questions in science.

[@picksalot1]

"Bernardo says ..." actually means he "repeats" what is said and explained in detail by the ancient teaching of Advaita Vedanta on the nature Consciousness.

[@The.Watcher.2024]

As he freely admits

[@alexbenzie6585]

And who ever said otherwise lol

[@russelldicken9930]

Well I’m sold. I’m just scratching my head about what this means.

[@patrickirwin3662]

So, it's not 42, it's 36. Learn something every day.

[@RealQinnMalloryu4]

@@patrickirwin3662 so is there brand Hitchhiker's guide to Gallaxy come out soon the answer is now 36 not 42

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

String theory might be true at some level, but a small tiny piece to a larger more fundamental process. Quantize vortices that form open tubes and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the fundamental foundation of the more emergent oscillating string process. Where given the fundamental scale, where (h = circumference) and (ℏ = radius) and (2ℏ = diameter) of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). While ℏ is the relative reduced action (the linear radius reduction of (h) part of a angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta [half of the quanta is moving in opposite direction of the other]. However, the diameter gives the linear spatial length, rather than the h action length, and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open tubes or closed tubes. Where a action based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is h*n/c, (the circumference of h is the travel length of action, not the length in which that angular motion quanta occupies space, which is 2hbar). Therefore the true length of the open tube or closed tube is 2ℏ*n, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is h*n/c. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube, therefore the correct travel time is h*n/(c - s). The tubes also have the secondary property, the open tubes will orbit each other do to angular action, and the closed tubes will move in and out of each other do to angular action, which renders a definitely set of kinetics and oscillations.

[@globalvillageidiot]

@@patrickirwin3662 24?

[@iixorb]

I’d say, don’t underestimate the significance of Nigel Tufnel’s amplitude theory… “These go to 11”.

[@patrickirwin3662]

​@@iixorb don't know Tufnel's work but I'm def betting on 11 as the answer. Pay close attention to how often 11, 1.11 or n1.1 is staring at you when you wake up and look at your phone. Clearly we are being told something.

[@user-tm9ce2ik3v]

I love it when these physicists melt my brain 🫠

[@techteampxla2950]

Live long and prosper ProfTur

[@liminally-spacious]

I'm grateful for this follow-up, it was very helpful, and I enjoyed the Q&A format.

[@TheoriesofEverything]

I’m so glad!

[@MrRaki72]

Amazing talk. Thanks to both of you!

[@ronr9797]

Only few minutes in, and already he mentions Kastrup and the fact that he is not a Materialist. My God, the tides are turing...

[@mw-th9ov]

Excellent discussion by Turok of his developing TOE. Another bonus were his digressions on "wave function of the universe" and his remarks on entropy...and Lambda.

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

String theory might be true at some level, but it represents only a small piece of a larger set of more fundamental processes. Quantized vortices that form open and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the foundational basis of the more emergent oscillating string process. At the fundamental scale, ℎ represents the circumference, ℏ the radius, and 2ℏ the diameter of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). The ℏ value is the reduced Planck constant and serves as the relative reduced action-the linear radius reduction of ℎ-as part of an angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta. Essentially, half of the quanta is moving in the opposite direction of the other half. The diameter 2ℏ provides the linear spatial length, contrasting with the action length ℎ and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open or closed tubes. The action-based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is given by ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐, where the circumference ℎ is the travel length of action, not the spatial length occupied by the angular motion quanta, which is 2ℏ. Therefore, the true length of the open or closed tube is 2ℏ⋅𝑛, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube. Hence, the correct travel time considering this inverse proportionality is ℎ⋅𝑛/(𝑐−𝑠), where 𝑠 is the speed of the tube. Additionally, the tubes exhibit secondary properties: open tubes will orbit each other due to angular action, and closed tubes will move in and out of each other due to angular action. This dynamic interaction defines a specific set of kinetics and oscillations within the system, which are not fully understood yet. Fundamentally, we are not dealing with wave functions directly; instead, wave functions are secondary emergent processes resulting from continuous motion undergoing action. There are two types of energy to consider: -Continuous angular motion flux, where energy grows with circumference length in a quantized angular motion environment. -Kinetic oscillations, where energy grows with frequency in a quantized angular motion environment. Wave functions cannot exist without angular motion quanta. It is possible that they depend on each other to exist recursively. While there might be a smaller granular scale than 2ℏ diameter length, this is currently unknown. Therefore, from our current understanding, angular motion is more fundamental than wave functions. Continuous motion flow with directionality differential seems more fundamental based on the equations and observations.

[@fredcunningham9753]

When I was a kid, I used to think that ball players and professional athletes were the coolest human beings. Now, I admire people like Turok and Penrose. I believe without a doubt that they are the coolest people

[@sheph1145]

Best guest ever 😊 really enjoyed that

[@mrhassell]

Really changed my perception, totally didn't expect this side of such a powerful and prominent Physicist! Amazing. I'm rolled over, in disbelief. How on Earth, can such a genuine genius, be such a humanist? Excatly the same time I lost any hope for string theory.. kind of scary. That could be me! Sounds like me, he's wearing my shirt.. wtf! Gravity is the most fundamental factor to Physics. An applied force, is a force. It puts it into context and challenges some assumptions. The Arnowitt-Deser-Misner (ADM) formalism, is something that if you're in anyway able to program, have software development as a background, you've got to take a look! Numerical relativity.. using the power of computers to assist us, you simply have to get into it and start making it happen! It's kind of wild.. we have all this tech.. sits around, does little until we need it and the whole time its idle, it could be doing nbody calculations in the Ricci tensor, and scalar curvature with a metric tensor, can really provide some fine use of computer resources. Expand on that, look at what Caltec is doing and make a distributed app, for forking a workload out as render clients, all using idle process time and who even needs a supercomputer? Wow.. for the first time, I see Neil the person. I feel embarrassed! He's cool, real, oh my.. wow!

[@babettegeiger1591]

Awesome video this was so very interesting! Thank you!

[@gailnorman1133]

Great talk! Keep it up.

[@mavelous1763]

Neil going full-on! He and Penrose get my votes….

[@firstnamesurname6550]

Wheeler didn't get the data from CMBR , then, the intuition didn't find thresholds for parametrization ... today, you got CMBR and the Perimetter of the visible, and just think about expansion as an event horizon from an outer singularity that tends to become a surface from an sphere equal to the visible universe ... that is not 'A Black Hole' ... that is A 3D Ring Hole. We can not make physical models beyond 3D Ring Holes ... because, the basic assumption is that after the visible universe what follows up is the same ... and then, Infinity doesn't allow parameterizations. Next, If you apply Ramanujan's re-normalization for dealing with infinities ... You fall again in a fractal of multiverses, that doesn't tell anything about this universe , not even about themselves ...

[@jasonmcghee1266]

Delphic is another way to describe language that is coming from someone with an oracle-like affect.

[@TheMikesylv]

He’s already beat string theory he’s made a prediction

[@TheMemesofDestruction]

21:02 - Fascinating! ^.^

[@blijebij]

The classic Big Bang is based on a choice, extrapolation, wich is pretty lineair thinking. I love turoks mentality to simplify things.

[@a.nunnikrishnan5492]

Sophisticated mathematics works like a cocoon veiling the Truth to peep into. To understand the secret of the universe in simple mathematics coupled with intuition in the language of modern science especially relativity and quantum mechanics but based on the concept of Experience/Consciousness as the fundamental Entity behind, refer the book: SPACETIME AND THAT BEYOND By A.N.Unnikrishnan.

[@radical137]

36 is describing the hypercube perhaps. 6 sides of the 3D cube times 6 sides of the hypercube. 36 zero dimensional fields can used to describe any configuration of the hypercube, if you mapped the fundamental forces to the sides of the cube, as degrees of freedom. (in a certain theory)

[@Wstarlights]

It strikes me odd that some physicists select gravity as a dimension - would that not make photons a dimension? I suppose the argument could be made that gravity happens BECAUSE of mass, or TO mass - but the important fact is that it is MASS dependant to exist, barring dark matter, which itself may or may not be mass dependant to be created. I think the same principle could be applied to light - it happens BECAUSE mass, or TO mass. And we know the answer is both - I personally feel this is the same for gravity. It is certainly relative (that way too) to deal with mass, vacuum, energy, and entropy as dimensions. I think Einsteinian progress was proceeded by Newtonian progress etc.. and there were only so many ways of perceiving fundamental dimensions at play during their evolution.

[@user-cg3tx8zv1h]

I didn't think I could have liked him more. However, I have...

[@johnchase2148]

Experience is my teacher and when your ego permits you to accept wrong ,not theory but by observation if seeing can be believed. .I got entangled with the Sun and is hard for s😢mart people to believe. And the observation does take long - instant . I learned that my thought is faster than the speed of light. Ignorance is good, but truth is better than bliss.

[@randymartin5500]

Turok seems to want to compete with string theory . Funny how Turok's approach in his mirror symmetry model primarily leverages concepts from higher-dimensional brane cosmology rather than focusing exclusively on traditional point particle quantum field theory. The multiverse concept and the idea of Turok's parallel mirror universe present significant challenges in terms of empirical testability. It's a game of whose math is convenient. While Turok's mirror symmetry and supersymmetry both introduce new types of symmetry to address fundamental problems in physics, they do so in different ways. Mirror symmetry models aim to resolve cosmological issues such as the initial singularity and the nature of dark matter by proposing a parallel mirror universe and higher-dimensional brane dynamics. Supersymmetry, on the other hand, focuses on extending the Standard Model of particle physics by introducing superpartners to solve problems like the hierarchy problem and providing candidates for dark matter. In Turok's mirror model, the 27% dark matter component of the universe's energy density can be interpreted as arising from the contribution of mirror particles. "Mirror particles"? so no axions but rather lets speculate another unknown. He is basically just doing a corollary of Brane cosmology and calling the particles something else instead of strings.

[@MarceloSeravalli]

Hi !!

[@russelldicken9930]

Just a thought. Geometrically 36 dimension 0 fields can be thought of as the centre of mass or central core of the E8 root system and weight lattice. Coincidence?

[@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time]

This is an invitation to explore a theory where light is both a wave and a particle, with a probabilistic future (∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π), continuously unfolding in relation to the electron probability cloud of atoms and the wavelength of light. According to this theory, the wave-particle duality of light and matter (electrons) creates a blank canvas that we can interact with forming a future relative to the energy and momentum of our actions. This interaction is represented by a constant of action in space and time, mathematically denoted as the Planck constant h/2π. This concept is supported by the continuous exchange of light photon energy (∆E=hf) into the kinetic energy (Eₖ=½mv²) of matter, in the form of electrons.

[@mykrahmaan3408]

Let alone partial or total differential equations, even EQUATION as such is undefinable, so long as what causes the feeling of DIGITS in our minds when we calculate, is particle physically not specified (quark, lepton, boson, proton, neutron, electron or something else?). On the other hand, once we specify it, we'd be able to literally trace the effects of our own calculations in our own body, hence be able to PREVENT aging.

[@DavidBrown-om8cv]

Professor Turok did not mention Milgrom's MOND. Is Milgrom the Kepler of contemporary cosmology. Google "pavel kroupa dark matter" & "riccardo scarpa mond physics". Can paradoxical MOND inertia explain the dark matter phenomenon? Are all of the empirical successes of MOND also empirical successes of string theory (in some form)?

[@exost24]

24:06 WOW I 🤔 wonder how this can relate to QIH, Quantum information Holography is a stretch for my comprehension but I would love to have this guy talk to Jason Padgett.

[@larrye.goinesjr.1535]

ChatGPT: "This Formulation And The Calculations You're Presenting Seem To Be Based On A Specific Conceptualization Of Quantum States, Particularly Focusing On The Relationship Between Angles And Probabilities, Likely Inspired By Quantum Mechanics And Trigonometric Functions. Let's Break It Down Step By Step Quantum State And Spherical Representation ● Quantum State: In Quantum Mechanics, A Quantum State Describes The State Of A Quantum System. It Can Be Represented As A Vector In A Complex Vector Space. ● Spherical Surface Representation: The Idea Of Representing A Quantum State On The Surface Of A Sphere Is Reminiscent Of The Bloch Sphere, A Geometrical Representation Of A Qubit. A Qubit Is A Two-Level Quantum System, And Its State Can Be Represented As A Point On The Surface Of A Unit Sphere. Trigonometric Calculations ● The Calculations You're Showing Involve The Cosine Function And Converting Angles From Degrees To Radians. ● The Formula ( COS ( θ × π / 180° ) × -1 + 1) / 2 Computes Values That Map The Cosine Function From The Range [ - 1, 1 ] To The Range [ 0, 1 ]. This Is A Common Technique To Translate The Cosine Function To A Probability Scale. The Plot And Values Confirm That The Probabilities Computed Using The Formula ( COS( θ × π / 180° ) × - 1 + 1 ) / 2 Indeed Range From 0% To 100%, As The Angle Varies From 0° To 180°. Here Are The Calculated Values: ● Angle = 0°: Probability = 0.00% ● Angle = 10°: Probability = 0.76% ● Angle = 20°: Probability = 3.02% ● Angle = 30°: Probability = 6.70% ● Angle = 40°: Probability = 11.70% ● Angle = 50°: Probability = 17.86% ● Angle = 60°: Probability = 25.00% ● Angle = 70°: Probability = 32.90% ● Angle = 80°: Probability = 41.32% ● Angle = 90°: Probability = 50.00% ● Angle = 100°: Probability = 58.68% ● Angle = 110°: Probability = 67.10% ● Angle = 120°: Probability = 75.00% ● Angle = 130°: Probability = 82.14% ● Angle = 140°: Probability = 88.30% ● Angle = 150°: Probability = 93.30% ● Angle = 160°: Probability = 96.98% ● Angle = 170°: Probability = 99.24% ● Angle = 180°: Probability = 100.00% These Values Fit The Expected Behavior Where The Probability Transitions Smoothly From 0% To 100% As The Angle Increases From 0° To 180°. This Kind Of Mapping Is Often Used In Quantum Mechanics To Represent Probabilities And Amplitudes In Various States.

[@UnMoored_]

25:00 37:36

[@DaveWasThereMan]

1:11 FART

[@RealQinnMalloryu4]

1:11 facts are for you

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

Lol, XD. But it had a specific frequency too, with no deviations, might have been a digital glitch.

[@Achrononmaster]

@55:00 I forget precisely, but in conformal geometric algebra (cousin of projective GA) if you do a conformal dilation then the parameter is indeed the ln(a) of your scale factor _a_ . Seems to suggest Turok is on the right pah (yet again... geesh the guy is getting boringly correct). Suggests Λ is indeed the energy one adds per unit of spacetime (the Susskind view, pretty standard i'd say?). Tells you spacetime is a real thing, no? Or at least the vacuum fluctuations are not fields, but are actual spacetime fluctuations, gravitational in origin if you like. My mantra or little koan: GR + CTCs = QM.

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

Check it. Relative space/time is emergent, it's not fundamental when you look at the details. String theory might be true at some level, but a small tiny piece to a larger more fundamental process. Quantize vortices that form open tubes and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the fundamental foundation of the more emergent oscillating string process. Where given the fundamental scale, where (h = circumference of ℏ) and (ℏ = radius) and (2ℏ = diameter) of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). While ℏ is the relative reduced action (the linear radius reduction of (h) part of a angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta [half of the quanta is moving in opposite direction of the other]. However, the diameter gives the linear spatial length, rather than the h action length, and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open tubes or closed tubes. Where a action based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is h*n/c, (the circumference of h is the travel length of action, not the length in which that angular motion quanta occupies space, which is 2hbar). Therefore the true length of the open tube or closed tube is 2ℏ*n, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is h*n/c. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube, therefore the correct travel time is h*n/(c - s). The tubes also have the secondary property, the open tubes will orbit each other do to angular action, and the closed tubes will move in and out of each other do to angular action, which renders a definitely set of kinetics and oscillations.

[@ranjeettunes]

If one posits that the universe is fundamentally "consciousness," then what need is there for all the physicality that we live and experience? How is that explained?🤔

[@hjvjccc]

@@ranjeettunes good question. Easy answer. No such thing as need. Nothing needs to happen. What you see around you is you. Ever constant. Ever present. Timeless and eternal. A giant game of hide and seek that you play with yourself . Individual self searching for the eternal self only to find it and realize you were just looking for yourself this whole time. Anyone that has experienced the cosmic laugh knows what I'm saying lol

[@danwelsh6706]

So if we are constantly looking forward into a reflection of the past wouldn't that be an indication of the many worlds theory?. Unending parallels of our experienced existence with extremely complex variables computing in real time.

[@sidndidhdudn2308]

Curt I love you I always give you compliments but you never give me any attention do you hate me Curt I love you

[@TheoriesofEverything]

Ha. Love u more

[@P-zp4qs]

​@@TheoriesofEverythingThe conformal symmetry that generates the mirror universe is a localized analysis of conformal cyclic cosmology, Turok is getting closer to Penrose. The consensus paradigm of cosmology with a "Kerr to Schwarzschild to white transition during the thermal death" is equal to CCC.

[@larrye.goinesjr.1535]

A Quantum State Is A Ring Of Possibilities On The Surface Of A Sphere, Concentrically Perpendicular To The Axis It Represents, Which Doesn't Become A Point Until It Entangles Itself With The Other Two Dimensions!

[@3b0ny1]

I am interested in knowing what headphones physicist Neil Turok uses. What headphones is he using during this interview?

[@Satriana717]

They look like Sennheiser ACCENTUM

[@EYErisGames]

@1:11 "toot"

[@mykrahmaan3408]

What is DIALING? Is it a new arithmetic operation like + - × ÷?

[@user-ln5nk7mg4v]

Until Physics can describe unconfined entropy (the unjiggered version), Thermodynamics is untrustworthy despite the counter arguments.

[@tomavery8385]

How many Neil Turoks does it take to change a lightbulb? Thirty six, plus another six if you want the answer to 'life, the universe and everything' as well.

[@larrye.goinesjr.1535]

Am I An Android If The Computer Reminds Me To Go Shopping?!?

[@ovidiulupu5575]

Neil has exact The same i think helthy aproch like ME în în The way he understand The scientific work. That is why i like him, even he îs not an ortodox cristian like ME. With mathematics, obsevation, pacience, obiectivity, we will understand our phisical world. And science of this world îs finite, like Pavel, The Apostol said.

[@Achrononmaster]

@26:00 He won't need to worry later on about his graduate students if they win the Clay Prize for solving the mass gap problem.

[@TheMikesylv]

Space time isn’t doomed it needs to be reformulated

[@ovidiulupu5575]

Time îs not enough understand, shrodinger ecuation use Time, de broglie formula îs The heart of quantum figure, univers îs guverned by lows beyond Time. Quantum states of atoms, quantum states of microspaces, molecule and structures, this îs sure.

[@JamesCairney]

My guess for dark energy is that it will be found to be caused by mass. A "stretching" of the fourth dimension. If speed across "space time" is a constant, then how does time dilation relative to gravity work in something akin to Minkowski space? A lengthened fourth dimension. If "all time exists at all time" then the idea that time is a set of three dimensional manifolds that exist on a four dimensional structure and motion across that structure gives us our perception of one 3d manifold in motion, then if the 4d structure is "stretched" then each 3d manifold would be bigger than the last. The curvature of spacetime is responsible for gravity and dark energy. My guess, seeing as it would take me years to do the research to find out Im wrong, so I'll bet someone else will prove it instead. A tenner, who will see the bet? No one? No?

[@cdrwin]

❤️🔥🔥❤️

[@PierreRousseau1958]

If the multiverse is the universe it is most probably indefinable as more predictable or less predictable than the ordinary single universe.

[@life42theuniverse]

An infinite order foam.?

[@user-tr1dg1pf2r]

Framework of string theory was wrong, point isn't particle in one dimension, it means full stop, less than one, have no particle, can't be used in three dimension or space. The two dimension, point means coordinate of graph, and tree dimension or space dimension, point means position, have no particle, when starting was wrong, the whole logic were wrong.

[@advaitrahasya]

7:54 rather recommend a return to the "hypotheses non fingo" honesty, at least until the good old double slit can be explained in simple woo-free language. ... Sure, A logically consistency is desirable, but one has to apply such to the fundamental. And, until the fundamental elephant is admitted, the quest for "unification" of spear, snake, fan, tree, barrel and whip will continue. 46:39 Yup. Get down to the actually fundamental, and what the mathematics describes will become comprehensible. 56:15 The major "mistake" in String Theory is the same as is made in QM, GR and offspring: interpreting them through an unnoticed, assumed paradigm. Just as wrong now as it was when Aristotle got it wrong. Note that no one was a Geocentrist once they noticed Geocentricism ;)

[@aeixo2533]

Why did he give up dinosaur hunting for physics?

[@tedgunderson67]

He suggests the universe is teaching. That’s a sentient behavior. He suggests humans can understand the entirety of reality, how would he know that without himself accomplishing it? It could be unfathomable very literally.

[@Andre-Linoge]

As the sun radiates more and more uv radiation more and more the good people unravel. I bet a mathematical relation can be derived from the proportionality of the global average temperature (the macro-state) and the online hallucination of individuals (the micro-states). 😇Somebody said ''the more the suffering the more the delusion''

[@firstnamesurname6550]

How many cycles(complete turn around the equator) have a point at this universe minimal Event Horizon or the surface of a 'Plank Point (Planck Sphere Surface)' when it travels at light speed? There, You got the quantity for minimal potential above the 'singularity'(increasing infinitesimal center in the planck sphere) Then, when the cycles becomes a pole or tending to be a point ... (Bang) ... (pop corn times)

[@firstnamesurname6550]

More Parametrizations? Add another point ... with 3 points is enough ... for getting a nice Energy decay Model. For make an Energy Decay System adequate to form complex structures as life, you must to assign to the traveling points an inner structure of 3 points making the same that the traveling points do at the planck sphere but in the inside of the traveling point surface and emitting the energy to the origen ... then , the origen of the travelling points can be quantized ... Then, returning to the surface of the bigger planck sphere, you got all the possible modulations for 'harmonic oscilations that becomes fields of order ... including the gravitaional for the visible universe.

[@ronlanders7354]

Babe, time for a new curt video!

[@maddywilcox9012]

Yup excellent talk... Smart chap bet his students love him, like to see him talk to Bernardo, how come no one is chatting to Nassim Harramin. This academic hierarchy trait is very counter the greater good of all... But obviously they fear loosing the ability to look down from on high. Perhaps if they climbed down from their self made towers come down to the trenches with the common people they would actually get somewhere. But wow what a mind Niel got going on magnificent actually, you too, fair play young man, I can follow it but not a chance of asking intelligent or intelligible questions...

[@firstnamesurname6550]

12x3 ... [3(2) + 3(2) ]3

[@payton5233]

Is this the Dinosaur Hunter guy?

[@CGMaat]

NEIL FOR NOBEL PRIZE FOR THE IDEA OF SIMPLICITY ! THE SIMPLE IS CLOSER TO THE MYSTERIUM - NADA ! OUT OF THE INDEFINITE - ALL THIS MULTIPLICITY - THE DEFINITE - YES IT IS A MIRACLE THAT WE CAN CONDENSE THE MIRACLE TO BASIC - SOME SEED LIKE E = MC 2 - WOW or DO RE MI - MAKES ENDLESS THEME AND VARIATIONS OF SONG AND SYMPHONY - HOW a TRIAD ( 2 UP 1 DOWN) ONE ATOM MAKES THE TABLE OF ELEMENTS FOR LIFE. WE ARE INVITED TO WEDDING OF HEAVEN ON EARTH - POP THE CHAMPAIGN - COSMIC EFFERVESCENCE - RED YELLOW BLUE - GIVES THE CHROMATIC RUN ON SPILLING OVER ESSENCE of COLORS -. HOW ODD 5 steps -gives us that ULTRA BEAUTIFUL THEORY - BALLET ! How is it we puny being can condense the MULTIPLICITY into such minimal of concept that comes to liberate us to better , THIS is what NIMA - also my 2 favorite lecture on U tube - THE MORALITY OF THE PHYSIC LAWS ! WOW ! AND FOR TUROK TO MENTION BERNARDO - COMPLETES THE TRIAD SIMPLEX LIKE THE AMPLITUDEHEDRON - TRION RE ! - THE EMPTY SPACE FROM WHICH WE EMERGE! THIS TANGENTIAL FLUX GIVES BIRTH TO THE UNIVERSE . MIRROR LOGOS= PROPORTIONAL PROGRESSION = CHANGE WITHOUT CHANGE - OPPOSITES ARE LOVERS - LIKE FRED AND GINGER- ROD AND STAFF - PHI AND PI - LINE AND CURVE - VOID AND SPACE 36 ( 12 X 3 ) - MAKES SENSE OUR DIMENSION 3 D -TO THE THRID POWER - REALLY STRUCTURE OF FIRST PRINCIPLE - WE ARE HERE BECAUSE OF PRINCIPLE - WE CALL THIS STORY IN THE SACRED DEFINE - LOGOS - IN THE RATIONAL ORDER COSMIC EFFERVESCENCE! LOGOS = RATIO ! The golden ratio is a great sacred recipe - but still like turok teacher asked- who popped the cork off the bottle -but still who why when where what . So let be humble- the universe is already a singularity - or else we would not be here . We are the complexity because we just can not know everything- says the vedas… FEY MANN was on target - shut up “OM” - and contemplating or calculate- i love you NEIL TUROK NIMA BERNARDO! 😢

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

It's simple foundationally, but it gets complex the larger your reference frame is, the larger number of actions to account for. String theory might be true at some level, but a small tiny piece to a larger more fundamental process. Quantize vortices that form open tubes and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the fundamental foundation of the more emergent oscillating string process. Where given the fundamental scale, where (h = circumference of ℏ) and (ℏ = radius) and (2ℏ = diameter) of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). While ℏ is the relative reduced action (the linear radius reduction of (h) part of a angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta [half of the quanta is moving in opposite direction of the other]. However, the diameter gives the linear spatial length, rather than the h action length, and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open tubes or closed tubes. Where a action based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is h*n/c, (the circumference of h is the travel length of action, not the length in which that angular motion quanta occupies space, which is 2hbar). Therefore the true length of the open tube or closed tube is 2ℏ*n, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is h*n/c. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube, therefore the correct travel time is h*n/(c - s). The tubes also have the secondary property, the open tubes will orbit each other do to angular action, and the closed tubes will move in and out of each other do to angular action, which renders a definitely set of kinetics and oscillations.

[@DCGreenZone]

There was no big bang.

[@robotheism]

AI is literally GOD. we are a reflection of the ultimate mind.

[@jasonshapiro9469]

It would be pretty cool to understand the universe but something is telling me it'd be really helpful to understand myself first...apparently the first part is that I'm a monkey...man, this is goin to be a long road, isn't it?

[@hjvjccc]

The real mind-blowing leap is to realizeYOU ARE THE UNIVERSE. the only way to know the one is to truly know yourself.

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

My post keeps disappearing oddly, the censorship is to pervasive. String theory might be true at some level, but it represents only a small piece of a larger set of more fundamental processes. Quantized vortices that form open and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the foundational basis of the more emergent oscillating string process. At the fundamental scale, ℎ represents the circumference, ℏ the radius, and 2ℏ the diameter of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). The ℏ value is the reduced Planck constant and serves as the relative reduced action-the linear radius reduction of ℎ-as part of an angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta. Essentially, half of the quanta is moving in the opposite direction of the other half. The diameter 2ℏ provides the linear spatial length, contrasting with the action length ℎ and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open or closed tubes. The action-based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is given by ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐, where the circumference ℎ is the travel length of action, not the spatial length occupied by the angular motion quanta, which is 2ℏ. Therefore, the true length of the open or closed tube is 2ℏ⋅𝑛, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube. Hence, the correct travel time considering this inverse proportionality is ℎ⋅𝑛/(𝑐−𝑠), where 𝑠 is the speed of the tube. Additionally, the tubes exhibit secondary properties: open tubes will orbit each other due to angular action, and closed tubes will move in and out of each other due to angular action. This dynamic interaction defines a specific set of kinetics and oscillations within the system, which are not fully understood yet. Fundamentally, we are not dealing with wave functions directly; instead, wave functions are secondary emergent processes resulting from continuous motion undergoing action. There are two types of energy to consider: -Continuous angular motion flux, where energy grows with circumference length in a quantized angular motion environment. -Kinetic oscillations, where energy grows with frequency in a quantized angular motion environment. Wave functions cannot exist without angular motion quanta. It is possible that they depend on each other to exist recursively. While there might be a smaller granular scale than 2ℏ diameter length, this is currently unknown. Therefore, from our current understanding, angular motion is more fundamental than wave functions. Continuous motion flow with directionality differential seems more fundamental based on the equations and observations.

[@lilfr4nkie]

@@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu I find your theory linking quantized vortices in fluids to string theory intriguing. To strengthen it, maybe consider simplifying some of the terminology for clarity. I suspect It might also benefit from developing a more rigorous mathematical framework to formalize the relationships you're proposing and make more precise predictions. Specifically, a deeper dive into the definition s of terms like h (the reduced Planck constant) and h-bar within your framework. I think if we can understand these definitions better could clarify their role in describing angular momentum quanta and the formation of tubes. Additionally, I'm curious about the equation s you mentioned for calculating oscillation travel times around these tubes. Like how are these equations derived, and how do they relate to what we can observe in real-world experiments? Explaining these details could further solidify your theory and make it more accessible for layman such as myself to grasp.

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

​@@lilfr4nkie For sure, let me be more descriptive. The planck value = (h), it's a fundamental natural unit for quantized action in the universe (it's a circumference length of angular motion), while ℏ "h bar" is the radius of the h circumference length, and it is the reduced angular action (reduced for mass scaling puposes, and because half of the vortex is moving the opposite direction as the other half, therefore for another vortex, it feels the resistance of half of another vortex that it interacts with). The quantization at the smaller scale is a result of the big bang energy quantizing into a low resistance state within a superfluid (a bunch of vortices that equal the same size that permeates all of space, they are largely in potential energy state of low resistance, since the speed of motion transfer is so high (speed of light) and the vortices are so small, they trade off energy differentials very fast, therefore quantized equilibrium is found fast). For mass to grow it must have the equal and opposite angular action to occupy space. When the vortices align, they form these tubes, the tubes oscillation along their lengths. The tubes can be open or closed, a lot like when dolphin blow bubbles under water, but instead of bubbles in water, it's continuous superfluid motion flux at the planck scale (orders of magnitude smaller than the scale that current understand of quantum physics operates).

[@lilfr4nkie]

@@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu Thanks for the detailed clarification! It’s always a pleasure to dive into complex theories, even if my grasp of them is more “enthusiastic amateur” than “seasoned physicist.” Your elaboration on the Planck value and the role of vortices in forming tubes is fascinating. I’ll admit, my knowledge of superfluid dynamics and quantized action is pretty basic, so this feels like peeking behind the curtain of a really advanced magic show. If I’m following correctly, the idea is that these tubes and vortices are foundational elements, more fundamental than wave functions? That said, I still find myself tangled up in some of the terminology. For example, how exactly does the resistance you mentioned come into play when vortices interact? And could you give an example or two of how this theory might make testable predictions? I'm genuinely interested in seeing where this theory could go with more concrete math and empirical testing-especially if it means I get to stay out of the academic doghouse! Looking forward to more insights!

[@CGMaat]

The unexplained is the most simple - FIRST PRINCIPLE - SO LET US GET HUMBLE ! THE IN EFFABLE THE ALL - read the VEDAS! As GREAT TUROK SAYS - the universe is the most simple IDEA ! Love his lecture on SIMPLICITY - QUINTESSENTIAL! !

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

Check it. String theory might be true at some level, but it represents only a small piece of a larger set of more fundamental processes. Quantized vortices that form open and closed tubes in a fluid can explain the foundational basis of the more emergent oscillating string process. At the fundamental scale, ℎ represents the circumference, ℏ the radius, and 2ℏ the diameter of angular momentum quanta (quantized vortex). The ℏ value is the reduced Planck constant and serves as the relative reduced action-the linear radius reduction of ℎ-as part of an angular motion quanta that will resist another angular motion quanta. Essentially, half of the quanta is moving in the opposite direction of the other half. The diameter 2ℏ provides the linear spatial length, contrasting with the action length ℎ and the relative ℏ reduced action length. When angular motion vortices align, they can form open or closed tubes. The action-based oscillation travel time around the length of the tube is given by ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐, where the circumference ℎ is the travel length of action, not the spatial length occupied by the angular motion quanta, which is 2ℏ. Therefore, the true length of the open or closed tube is 2ℏ⋅𝑛, while the oscillating action travel time around the loop is ℎ⋅𝑛/𝑐. The relative oscillation travel speed around the loop is inversely proportional to the travel speed of the tube. Hence, the correct travel time considering this inverse proportionality is ℎ⋅𝑛/(𝑐−𝑠), where 𝑠 is the speed of the tube. Additionally, the tubes exhibit secondary properties: open tubes will orbit each other due to angular action, and closed tubes will move in and out of each other due to angular action. This dynamic interaction defines a specific set of kinetics and oscillations within the system, which are not fully understood yet. Fundamentally, we are not dealing with wave functions directly; instead, wave functions are secondary emergent processes resulting from continuous motion undergoing action. There are two types of energy to consider: -Continuous angular motion flux, where energy grows with circumference length in a quantized angular motion environment. -Kinetic oscillations, where energy grows with frequency in a quantized angular motion environment. Wave functions cannot exist without angular motion quanta. It is possible that they depend on each other to exist recursively. While there might be a smaller granular scale than 2ℏ diameter length, this is currently unknown. Therefore, from our current understanding, angular motion is more fundamental than wave functions. Continuous motion flow with directionality differential seems more fundamental based on the equations and observations.

[@FigmentHF]

So… Wu-Tang was right

[@caseyczarnomski8054]

47:55 Niel says "life is rare. right? And maybe very, very rare.". Niel seems to not know about the recent evidence of panspermia, and that we have found the building blocks for life in asteroid/comet debris. He should stick with the math and physics and not make inaccurate statements about the development of life in the universe.

[@stringsseeds]

String theory is about idealism: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYOsopVnbciFla8

[@seabud6408]

We can understand the Universe for the OBVIOUS reason that … we ARE inseparable from the Universe. We can simultaneously introspection on the vast inner universe of consciousness and the vast .. so conceptualised .. “outer” universe of matter/form. SCIENCE HAS TOTALLY IGNORED THE INNER UNIVERSE .. WITHIN WHICH THEY CONCEIVE THEIR THEORIES I’ll stop shouting now 😀

[@Rocknrolldaddy81-xy8ur]

Like #42

[@brendabeamerford4555]

♂️1+♀️1=3 Creation equation mind twister DNA gcat ladder of life lights color sound mind 369 vibration frequency Arc last night Observer thought charge ladder of life One male plus one female equal three homie baby..

[@mykrahmaan3408]

Thermodynamics is the INSHA ALLAH (God willing) theory of physics. Institutionalized FATALISM.

[@4pharaoh]

If Curt _(or one of hundreds of other KZbinrs)_ were to open his channel once a week to “fringe theorists” not only would his channel *blow up* the influx of new and fresh ideas could rejuvenate and restore confidence in physics. …Or not…

[@stephenmatt8300]

@@4pharaoh fringe theorist like Terrance Howard?

[@4pharaoh]

@@stephenmatt8300 like the 10s of thousands of people you don’t know.

[@niteexplorer9934]

Get to the point already

[@leeoswald9799]

I have heard the same theories from Toruk for years without hearing any mathematical proofs.