QED / SDC performance comparison.

[@ianshugg2681]

Not a volume adjustment bro , it’s a thrash hold setting which should be on 3

[@squizzygolddogtaylor7463]

Very interesting video!! I like the fact it’s an Australian made machine. But my only concern has been it’s ease of use with the settings!, as I thought they were a bit confusing to understand personally. But I guess if I had someone to show and explain how different settings effect each other, and how to workout what settings to use for each particular bit of ground.

[@methylone1]

they are both Australian machines

[@nick1f]

Well done BW. The difference is huge, I was not sure of any targets when tested with the SDC. It would be nice if you could invite one of the Minelab experienced operators to use their SDC to identify the targets, so there is no bias during testing

[@bugwhiskers]

I am sure SP would be very happy for you to attend a test/comparison session. He can be contacted at Detech Australia.

[@bugwhiskers]

Stinky Pete knows the SDC very well, the test is repeatable.

[@TuronProspekta]

Very impressive...hows she handle rich clay ?

[@cdwwillow9671]

How much for qed ?

[@grahambald400]

Why is the coil of the 2300 pointing up in the air..Are you trying some new techniques..Crank the 2300 up to 5 and point it flat to the ground for a proper comparison..

[@qedmetaldetectors4972]

The targets are on blocks above the ground and that contributes to the appearance that the nose of the coil is pointing upwards. The most sensitive part of the coil is in the centre and as a result it doesn't matter what the angle of the coil is but rather the distance of the centre to the target.

[@grahambald400]

QED Metal Detectors It’s definitely not the best way to compare them ..You can do better than blocks of wood..