How Physicists Created a Holographic Wormhole in a Quantum Computer

[@QuantaScienceChannel]

UPDATE: In February 2023, an independent team of physicists presented evidence that the research described in this video did not create any wormholes, holographic or otherwise. Read our coverage of these developments at Quanta Magazine: www.quantamagazine.org/wormhole-experiment-called-into-question-20230323/

[@underarm]

Ow Shi-

[@alanarcher]

Thus once again showing we should never jump the gun when it comes to (good) science.

[@armandoolivares7467]

So can u stick your finger in it??

[@noam65]

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Let me try to understand the experiment, a physically reproducible thing was compared to what, exactly? The folks striking it down, at least from the article rebutting the experiment, seem completely disconnected from basic concepts of what a hologram is. Am I the only one finding this distressing? I'm a layman. I'm probably missing something. Can someone explain this more simply? In the meantime, I reject this seemingly amorphous response, as it has no physical foundation. It can't be, because it can't be, makes no sense to me. There is an additional problem. The video was created for general consumption. The response was not, in my opinion.

[@KillerCombow]

@@noam65 The main argument seems to be that the indicator that the first group was looking for to validate the results of their experiment which is "perfect side-winding" naturally occur in simulations with 7 or less terms anyways. This means that the first group would need to use a much more advanced quantum computer to actually validate their results.

[@kozumemansi]

as somebody who comes from a country where research is not appreciated enough by most universities, videos like these really motivate me to keep up with my curiosity and perhaps do something of my own one day, thankyou quanta magazine, love from india.

[@kanishkchaturvedi1745]

Indian student here who went to America for physics. First this video is pure mumbo jumbo, not an iota of science explained. Second ,some sobering advice. Unless you're confident you'll be leagues better than your competition and will get funded for the entire ~20 year journey of student to government scientist/tenured professor don't waste your money. Being a theorist in India is a much better option. Also most researchers fail. I know I am being discouraging but I feel I would have greatly benefited if I had known reality before going to the US with dreams and coming back to India with poor health and debt. Physics curiosity can always be satiated with from proper YT channels like pbs spacetime and Sabine. I also take long walks with people pursuing physics phds in US and we obtain fascinating insights into quantum theory on our walks. Sure a paper with my name attached to it is not a consequence of my progess with theory but atleast my friends are being helped for their papers- while I am not slaving away doing nightmarishly hard equations in hope of maintaining good grades

[@kozumemansi]

Thankyou so much for taking your time to write this out, i completely agree with what you are concerned about but what i meant by saying that i will keep up my curiosity was the curiosity to learn, i'am currently studying in the 12th grade and have been preparing for entrance exams for the past two years and something that i have observed in these years by attending certain coaching institutions is how the teachers never want to let our curiosity to know more about the subject we are studying about grow instead call us stupid for wasting our time for indulging into these theories instead of solving numericals that could get us the marks that we need to get into these so called top educational institutions which again is not inherently a bad thing and that's their job to guide us to score as much as we can after all we enrolled in these courses because we want to score better but at times it feels extremely discouraging because why the hell are we even studying these subject when all we are allowed to do is to perform into a calculated boundary that will apparently help us succeed, I know this might sound childish as i have not experienced the real world at all and i do not completely understand the practicality of it all but well as of now i just simply want to study more about a subject rather than only solving numerous number of modules where the only thing i'am trying to run after is a numerical value instead of actually understanding the theory and applicability of the said subject.

[@Allenmarshall]

@@kanishkchaturvedi1745 That doesn't line up with the physicists I know (my father and two scientists at fermilab). I wonder what could have been done differently for you?

[@infidel202]

@Allen our understanding of physics is only just starting same with our understanding of mathematics, why limit when you can explore, two hundred years ago the earth was supposed to be flat, yes mistakes will happen but isn't that part of how we learn, we are laying the foundations of the next two hundred years, be brave be proud of being wrong so we can learn from it

[@streampunksheep]

what country you from?

[@dentonfender6492]

"We'll learn something by trying", the most important statement in this video. Research is never a waste of time, and money!

[@edgepixel8467]

No. In the end, the USA is gonna teleport military hardware straight to Andromeda. You know, for democracy and liberty.

[@michaelmccarthy2369]

You need to repent in the name of Jesus christ.

[@dentonfender6492]

@@michaelmccarthy2369 You need to stop worshiping money! Jesus stated:"Its simpler for a Camel to fit through the eye of a needle than for a rich man (like Elon Musk, your reverend, and you if rich) to enter the kingdom of heaven".

[@nullllllllllllllllllllllllllll]

Sometimes it is, but even when it is, it isnt! You learn you're at the wrong tree or in the entirely wrong forest, but you learn something at least.

[@xw39]

Maybe not never. Learning and evolving is not only important but necessary. What’s also necessary is that every living person is fed. If your putting in millions of dollars just to learn about the universe or time or this or that. Then you should atleast feed the people that need food first.

[@TheStringBreaker]

*Credit to the animators as well! Phenomenal work!*

[@garbagestarkaloyan]

Yes. That is what I was thinking. It is a great pleasure to watch the video.

[@Allenmarshall]

Here here!

[@nickc3657]

Science artists and illustrators are such awesome people!!

[@publicspace234]

Agreed! Beautiful video. The textures and illustrations look fantastic.

[@bamf6603]

Hahaha i bet this dude will regret this when he gets home.

[@sowrabhsudevan9119]

Quanta magazine has such amazing production quality. Would be great if they could also make longer videos, that could go a little bit more into the technical details.

[@loulimibarney3435]

They sure do make great visuals, would be good if they could include some scientific content as well.

[@amorosogombe9650]

I can't believe I'm living in the age of real artificial wormholes. And yes. This looks like a Nobel prize for sure.

[@caasieu]

if you were being sarcastic it would've been funny lol

[@WorksopGimp]

For a mathematical formula realy, black holes are still a mathematical equation

[@evolvedfish]

@@caasieu Why?

[@caasieu]

@@evolvedfish just thought of it while reading it, if not serious it would've been a great form of sarcasm nothing besides a thought tho lol

[@realist4859]

Such a comment kinda requires you to understand some pretty complex shit. I'd love to gain insights there, pls share!

[@ensignbodybag]

I am not a physics nerd, but I found this video fascinating, even though I didn't understand all of the terminology. Well done !

[@JUST-UK-JAY]

I've been on youtube since it began and THIS is one of the most kindest, honest and genuine comments I've seen to this very date !! He didn't have to say anything at did he? I wish my mentality was like this.

[@celinamilian]

This statement is dumb to the core, are you a bot? How can you say well done about things you don't understand? 🙄 What if they are talking about killing you secretly.

[@bouxman2989]

It’s pretty much people trying to open a teleporter, and you can’t just send humans into a black hole without making sure. So this whole thing was just people testing if it was possible with the best computer in the world.

[@dirhi]

same

[@wbass243]

When they get to the point of opening up "the back rooms" , "the mist" creatures coming through a portal, " or The upside down world from "stranger things"... I hope that i realize im just the thoughts of some alien living in a matrix being pumped full of LSD through my Elon Musk Neuralink powered by Googles quantum computer array so i can Be the hero of my full dive "meta" game where i can name my avatar Kirito and open up the world seed advancing human evolution to the digital realm!

[@alfredsutton4412]

As an old physicist, I’m amazed. The video did a great job of explaining the history and the experiment.

[@martinlawrence4200]

Einstein Rosen bridge. Inside is outside. That´s all.

[@heyitsdrew]

they didn't explain the math. all they did was show a graph and say this is that. so to explain it they need to go deeper. all this video did was scratch the surface. and they didn't really explain the consequences. so both ER and EPR theories are still just theories. they it exist in a simulation of non-reality. good for them they were able to prove something, but it's like saying Luke Skywalker is a jedi. yes that is true, Luke is a jedi, but it's not true in the sense he's a fictional character. so what are they trying to solve? what else are they or can they prove? we already know spooky action at a distance can be observed and measured. even the greatest scientist Einstein has lied to us before. he made an equation seem as though the universe always existed. but he was called out for it. because if the universe has a definite beginning, which it does, it means an almighty infinite creator God willed it into existence. Think about how God knows everything and can be everywhere at once. is that what science is trying to prove when religion beat them to it? "For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries."

[@lloran7]

​@@heyitsdrew It solves Einstein's hope to unify General Relativity and Qauntum Physics, DUUUUHHH ! You might as well ASK WHY Einstein spent his last couples of years of his life trying to unify General Relativity and Qauntum Physics, until he dies and still cannot come up with any solution to this problem. And we are talking about the unprecedented Genius Albert Einstein here, the father of the robust physics field of science here. And you bring up GOD to this hardcore scientific community. My God you are clueless.

[@neonblack211]

@@heyitsdrew its probably going to take a long time befopre the implications are fully understood and if its a real phenomenon or not

[@golbez3794]

you're actually buying this?

[@emanresu4720]

This is my field of work, quantum hardware (PhD). Thanks for covering this topic. I participate in both the technical and non-technical coverage of quantum hardware. On that note, I'll be delivering some invited quantum hardware lecture series on the machines/chips we've been building at my research lab and more. It will be open to the public next week on April 12th with my IBM friends and QuantumGrad. You are all welcomed to join us to learn about what tools and equipment we use to build real quantum devices in the field. Ignore the naysayers, let's keep building and learning from what we build. -Onri the Diné Quantum Engineer

[@ryancabral6294]

Do you have any saved recordings of the lectures?

[@dodgydave1053]

I'd be interested, working with Artiq and QICK right now

[@ricomajestic]

Would love to see your lectures on quantum hardware.

[@emanresu4720]

@@ricomajestic copypaste lol

[@rahulsakariya3564]

Really appreciate the way you explain such a complex topic through the video. Such information motivates youngsters like me to take an interest in quantum computing.

[@aelolul]

Agreed. Too bad they exaggerated their claims to the point of lying.

[@kathleenmann7311]

Even 70yr old kids 😉😁

[@hsvmobileac]

They have not explained anything. This mental masturbation has nothing to do with reality.

[@csciabar]

They didn’t really explain anything imo.

[@Happilynumb]

They might actually win the Nobel Prize for Physics! Well done!

[@MattBenn367]

They have to. This is the biggest thing to come out of physics in a decade.. and we've had one hell of a decade.

[@Zahlenteufel1]

@@MattBenn367 the importance of the finding is vastly overstated in the video. There were no wormholes. It is a good step but not a breakthrough.

[@nicolasfredesfranco9047]

@@Zahlenteufel1 what would be the difference between 2 things with exactly the same theoretical and empirical behavior? if they are a duality, science can't tell which one is "really" going on, whatever that means

[@ecthroi]

they most definitely won't with this

[@elias_xp95]

@@nicolasfredesfranco9047 "...Nobel Prizes can't be awarded to deceased individuals; the Nobel Committee doesn't award Prizes for theoretical work before its predictions are experimentally confirmed; and theoretical physics is churning out ideas that can't be directly tested with today's technology and resources."

[@spiritabsolute3026]

This might be one of the breakthrough's in quantum physics giving us the first glimpse of unifying generalized form of relativity to Quantum gravity. I am so happy seeing the enthusiasm you guys have. Getting such an outstanding result it really made everyone happy.

[@jamesthompson3576]

Absolutely

[@trollbiene8410]

@Dont follow think for your self well, it's a "quantum leap" to a generalized theory of everything. As the physicists in the video already said, this was the first time that gravitational effects were measured on a quantum level. That's hella insane. And hmmm.. difficult question.. you see, conciousness is kind of a thing for itself.. We still don't really know how conciousness is connected to physics or any quantum effects or that sorta stuff.. Sooo.. I guess we'll see, but a theory of everything would definitely help us understand such things better.

[@JohnJohn-td2mj]

Are we forgeting the real down side to all these discoveries?

[@jadendosanjh297]

@@JohnJohn-td2mj what’s that

[@trollbiene8410]

@@JohnJohn-td2mj what would that be?

[@Thor_the_Doge]

I want a however-many-hours-is-needed video that explains this in as much detail as possible so that I can actually understand what they mean under a "holographic traversable wormhole made in a quantum computer" Like is it some equation that said the qubit traversed through? Did they create a 2d/3d virtual wormhole and sent a virtual object through? etc

[@gravity00x]

you would be disappointed to know the real answer to your questions. this whole ordeal is nothing but a big pile of steaming garbage. a gimmick if you will with no real world evidence. its a made up scenario of something that nobody knows (black hole physics) or has evidence for. the internals of a black hole could be anything, for all we know. making up a set of rules of your own to PROVE that a BH is also a Wormhole without actually having any evidence for it is just pure....????? what do you even call this. its not even an entertaining movie but a bumch of """scientists""" having a big mastah-bation session over something they made up and find very cool, but which sadly doesnt exist and probably never will.

[@v2ike6udik]

They will not. If they find, they will not tell. Meanwhile, if you do not know yet, you can have this portal inside you. Remote view. And HD version, everything in focus. Zoom capabilities. I accidentally induced the state. Portal did not close for 4h. Tried to close it with my mind. Ups. I went through.

[@v2ike6udik]

Also, Have you met telepaths? Ponder about it. Bloody among us. Not good ppl. Decievers.

[@v2ike6udik]

Also, if i tell more secific details, YT Comment Digilord will come, *naah, sorry, Dave, you are not allowed to tell ppl the truth". After i went through i started discovering how many things in math and phys are suppressed. And it is massive. Science/math is often pure l.i.e. They are afraid of geometric solutions/explanations, as "they" (evilones) would loose advantage.

[@phillyblunt138]

The production level of your videos is off the charts. Bravo folks 👏

[@jowofoto]

Came to comment the same. Good camera work and artwork, audio and edit. 👌

[@marukuyama8266]

I know right? The editor needs some praise here. Just look at the seamless hand gesture transitions from 9:38 ~ 9:47 that’s the real spooky action at a distance

[@JohnJohn-td2mj]

sarcasim? 🤔

[@Dnyanesh1]

@@marukuyama8266 ohh i didn't noticed that but really great! Appreciate you

[@leostir4041]

Einstein said a lot of things. But my favorite -concerning entanglement - is "I like to believe the moon is still there even if I'm not looking at it."

[@ricomajestic]

That quote wasn't really a statement about entanglement but about any quantum wavefunction and its interpretation.

[@Reptex_cs]

Very interesting video. I would love to see a followup video going in-depth of explaining how it works, that helps the viewer make a conclusion. There is no limit to what you can teach people on KZbin!

[@westownsend8228]

Agreed. It was way too hand wavy regarding what actually happened. I get these subjects arent really simple to explain, but as Mr Einstein would say, if you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough.

[@Reptex_cs]

@@westownsend8228 Einstein said it well!

[@madavuk]

agreed

[@anywallsocket]

They kept saying ‘the wormhole’ like it wasn’t just an equation written in a quantum computer.

[@mando074]

Part of the reason it seems too "hand-wavy" or somewhat magical is because the experiment was conducted to a simplified (basic) 7 terms down from the 210 thereby bringing down the complexity. This made it possible for the current quantum computers to run the experiment and at least say in a fundamental level it is possible for a wormhole to exist. However, hopefully in the future it can be run with all 210 terms (adding complexity) to create a more solid "model" of how this could work in reality. A more solid model will make this seem less "magical".

[@amos083]

If I get it correctly, the Hollywood image is wrong: To go through a wormhole, a spaceship will have to be disintegrated on one side and reassembled on the other; inside the wormhole, its presence would be felt only as a phase change of some field wave (assuming that observing this wouldn't totally collapse the wormhole).

[@illuminatelair8084]

would've liked for them to explain how/where the negative energy pulse came from?

[@frun]

Think of it in terms of regular positive energy. It just has a negative sign, but otherwise nothing special. Energy happens to flow from place to place.

[@nonyobiz-records]

from the article : "Rotating all the particles’ spin directions translates, in the dual space-time picture, into a negative-energy shock wave that sweeps through the wormhole, kicking the qubit forward and, at a predictable time, out of the mouth." ... its a great read and much more grounded than the video

[@crazyspace6792]

@@frun no....

[@TasX]

@@nonyobiz-recordsthat’s only if you assume the holographic principle. There hasn’t been any proof or demonstration that this principle is true Here’s another quote from the journal “because nine qubits can be easily simulated on a classical computer, the results of this experiment cannot teach us anything that could not be learnt from a classical computation, and will not teach us anything new about quantum gravity.”

[@nyk7979]

This reminds me of the time I made a perfect circle mirroring sin wave patterns on my tI-83 in high school. I was very proud of myself.

[@Guitarisforgrins]

It's pretty much the same thing.

[@ntal5859]

No such thing because the curve is infinite ie the smaller the step the more resolution, so there is no perfect circle.

[@TorutheRedFox]

I mean (cos(t), sin(t)) where t is the degree of the point on the circle will give you a circle

[@soupy5890]

Do you mean you approximated a circle with sine wave patterns or something else?

[@BeardedBarley1]

Hmm. Interesting.

[@harakiri4350]

I am so proud of that science is making these huge steps forward.

[@infiniteuniverse123]

This isn't even close to being a "step". This is scientists having fun with computers because they can't figure anything else out. There is no such thing as wormholes. They are something you get when you use a theory that "creates" the universe. The theory they are using in the computer is an utter nightmare. Why else do you think fusion has been created for decades and never shown any sign at all it will produce energy? It's all because of the worst scientific theory in science history.

[@MyFirstHandle]

Uh oh, we can time travel now?

[@m.a.farrokhzad1962]

The next question is if our brains are quantum machines, can we assume our process of thinking is nothing but a network of entanglement and wormholes defying space-time order to travel to past and the future?.

[@dallassegno]

toward what?

[@danisob3633]

@@dallassegno towards more knowledge

[@roldanduarteholguin7102]

On 19-Apr-2000 I invented the Delta Vehicle that uses all known Deltas: Pressure, Voltage, Magnetism, Density, Temperature, Height, Gravity. The most important Delta of my Vehicle is the Gravitational Delta. To take advantage of the Gravitational Delta, the vehicle has three devices: 1. Gravitational Wave Tuner 2. Gravitational Wave Amplifier 3. Gravitational Wave Directioner

[@something8013]

This video is so good edited and does an amazing job explaining all these concepts. Good job!!

[@snakex555]

I have no idea how any of this works but it seems really cool, and I'm so happy that there are people that do know and put their effort towards it.

[@bullshitvendor]

mmh, I dont know about that. The applications for "bending reality" in such a fundamental way, considering humanitys history, is really rather unnerving.

[@bullshitvendor]

@@dad1844 babysteps ...

[@rafaelgonzalez4175]

They don't know didly squat. Many scientists won't even admit time is no longer relevant. And were wrong about it all along. They won't even admit the speed of light is also wrong. But hey We humans are more proud than we are forthcoming.

[@rafaelgonzalez4175]

@@dad1844 That is because the bridge was not configured for varying mass. No telling how much weight there actually is in space. I may be 150lbs but in space that 150lbs has no torque. When I step down it is as if I am still. I can move my muscles but it has no resistance. What is my mass oppose to my weight now.

[@tonyzuco6144]

*"I have no idea how any of this works..."* That's because it doesn't. Quantum Mechanics is a farce.

[@theoglenn]

I’m an undergraduate in college, majoring in “CS & Physics”, and it is my dream to go into Quantum Computing and AI. This video is very motivational and I have an even stronger desire to get there and contribute discoveries to all the mysteries still out there.

[@christinewaddell]

🙏❤️ I hope you have a wonderful adventure with many exciting discoveries!

[@heinzhuberti3583]

I am working towards a master degree in quantum physics at a university in Germany. At the moment I should be doing a problem sheet on quantum information theory and I procrastinated by watching this video. :D I agree that this video is really well made and it is highly encouraging for people like us to work harder and keep doing what we are doing, but it should also be mentioned that even a grand unified theory will not necessarily bring the warp drive or other magical technologies. I am saying the producers are hyping up the actual physics to appeal to a wider audience. Still cool though, don’t get me wrong.

[@heinzhuberti3583]

@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ Also, what is so unholy about doing fundamental physics? One of my colleagues is a devout Christian…

[@theParticleGod]

@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ please point to the verse in scripture that says that studying quantum gravity is forbidden. Perhaps it's you who needs to repent, by actually reading the scripture, you'll find it has nothing to say about science. If there is a god he must be ashamed and angry about people like you, who follow none of his teachings, but throw interpretations of them in others faces all the time. Judge not lest ye be judged.

[@SpencerTwiddy]

@@theParticleGod guys he didn't say anything about the video, and the quote isn't talking about the video. This is probably just something he pastes in every comment section

[@bjrnlsriedelriedel7500]

Have seen it everywhere when it happened but did not undertand it that well. The video explained it pretty well. And I have a lot to read and study about it. What a time to be alive at.

[@SonOfMeme]

"Let’s start with the title. No, scientists haven’t created a wormhole using a quantum computer. They haven’t even simulated one. They simulated some aspects of wormhole dynamics under the crucial assumption that the holographic correspondence of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model holds. Without this assumption they just have a bunch of qubits being entangled, no relation to wormholes. The article just takes this assumption for granted, and cavalierly goes on to say nonsense like “by manipulating the qubits, the physicists then sent information through the wormhole”. Shortly afterwards, though, it claims that “the experiment can be seen as evidence for the holographic principle”. But didn’t you just assume it was true? And how on Earth can this test the holographic principle? It’s not as if we can do experiments with actual wormholes in order to check if their dynamics match the holographic description. The deeper problem, though, is that the article never mentions that this simulation can easily be done in a classical computer. Much better, in fact, than in a quantum computer. The scientific content of the paper is not about creating wormholes or investigating the holographic principle, but about getting the quantum computer to work. As bizarre and over-the-top the article is, it is downright sober compared to the cringeworthy video they released. While the article correctly points out that one needs negative energy to make a wormhole traversable, and that negative energy does not exist, and that the experiment merely simulated a negative energy pulse, the video has no such qualms. It directly stated that the experiment created a negative energy shockwave and used it to transmit qubits through the wormhole. For me the worst part of the video was at 11:53, where they showed a graph with a bright point labelled “negative energy peak” on it. The problem is that this is not a plot of data, it’s just a drawing, with no connection to the experiment. Lay people will think they are seeing actual data, so this is straightforward disinformation."

[@nebulisnoobis102]

Why do people put quotation marks around entire comments?

[@SonOfMeme]

@@nebulisnoobis102 "Because the whole comment is a quote"

[@Anon-xd3cf]

I am glad someone in this comments section actually gets it. It is group think propping up more group think. Assumptions based on previous untested unproven assumptions.

[@nebulisnoobis102]

@@SonOfMeme you’re quoting the comment you are writing as the quote, and is thus a normal comment. It wasn’t written before, and there’s no reason to quote something if it only exists as a quote. Who are you quoting, by the way?

[@SonOfMeme]

@@nebulisnoobis102 >It wasn't written before "Are you sure about that"?

[@vaultboy2270]

I never thought as a little kid i would get to be in this era of technology. Fantastic video

[@gunzmith29r]

its self delusion..not technology.

[@wardvereecken9701]

@@gunzmith29r wdym?

[@SnowWow]

@@wardvereecken9701 Don't mind him, he's just someone who worships a book, and i'm not saying its wrong but he shouldn't call other people delusionals

[@alexsmith6914]

@@gunzmith29rThank you! Couldn’t say it any better myself!

[@aaronjoshdelacruz9856]

@@alexsmith6914 it was fun to descover somethin u know, life is on process anyways

[@fjelltun92]

This is truly astonishing, this way of using a quantum computer may just turn out to be as big of a discovery as the internet itself was. Or bigger. And I loved the way it was made so understandable in this video. Amazing work.

[@Baerchenization]

The internet was not discovered.

[@crawlmanjrable]

@@dad1844 just provide proof no one will believe you otherwise

[@epajarjestys9981]

Lol, the internet was a discovery. It always existed in nature, and we just needed to connect to it. Of course.

[@blackdereker4023]

@@Baerchenization Don't be obtuse on purpose, you know what he meant.

[@crawlmanjrable]

@@dad1844 fraud

[@Goldslate73]

"its still baby enough to fit in the crib." That HAS to go in the paper.

[@jayplug3199]

When real professionals do a documentary, just by how long enough the written statements were lasting captivatingly on screen you can tell how well these “video production” scientists know what they do.

[@amihere383]

Yeah, there's a whole lot of stuff here that was left unexplained and kind of just swept under the rug. not super impressed.

[@amro.1701]

@@amihere383 I think they were trying to simplify it for the general public to understand because the concepts they talk about are extremely difficult to understand and explain in a 17 min video. They did an amazing job simplifying the information for everybody.

[@amihere383]

@@amro.1701 They simplified by not actually explaining what it was?

[@datstift610]

Skill issue.

[@Luke-ih1oc]

@SavageBear They said quite a bit; I think perhaps your ability to understand it is under par.

[@ToriKo_]

Beautiful visuals guys, tho I’m not sure I really understood the evidence or explanations

[@akhilsankar]

In simple they have managed to simulate how a wormhole might work in a quantum computer, it's so astonishing that the results validates our understanding in underlying mathematics, so opens up a new realm of possibilities. This new discovery opens a new possibilities that we can simulate other complex theoretical concepts that related to gravity and quantum mechanics which was only limited untill now to abstract mathematical theories. Sorry for long sentences..

[@katiebarber407]

that's because this is fucking bullshit. notice how there's not a single actual picture outside of computer animation?

[@Zahlenteufel1]

@@katiebarber407 that's a bad reason for calling it bullshit, but I agree, it's bullshit.

[@ToriKo_]

@@akhilsankar I think maybe i want to understand how simulating (?) on a Quantum computer (?) a worm hole (?) validates and teaches us about the underlying physics (?), but I’m not sure I have the intellect to keep up, even if it was explained explicitly. -> now with some of my questions inserted: maybe i want to understand how simulating (what does simulation mean here and why is it analogous enough to the real thing that it counts? If this is a simulation what would the real analogous experiment be?) on a Quantum computer (it seems the implications of doing this on a quantum computer and not a classical computer matter, but how? And why?) a worm hole (so we’re doing this to learn the link between worm holes and QM, but how exactly is a worm hole quantum mechanical again?) validates and teaches us about the underlying physics (so all the above questions tie together to teach me something about the underlying physics, and those lessons would be...?), but I’m not sure I have the intellect to keep up, even if it was explained explicitly.

[@GMPranav]

"The are so many questions that one could explore using these ideas but the most exciting are the ones that we can't yet pose". Underrated line

[@FPJourney]

Wow, this video really sparked my imagination! This has potential to definitely be a game-changer and could revolutionize the way we explore the universe. I'm excited to see where this technology could take us in the future. Keep up the great work!

[@bithibegum3251]

@@dad1844 pls

[@MrCubFan415]

@@dad1844 Theoretically, it wouldn’t prohibit FTL (or perhaps I should say Shorter-than-Normal-Distance) communication, though, would it?

[@DavidMcCoul]

Fascinating! I'd love to learn more in depth about this, as the video is awfully vague. So they see a "peak" in the data, with the y-axis as "information"? What does this mean exactly? Second, how is negative energy-- seemingly impossible from a classical physics perspective-- generated and sent through the "wormhole" during the experiment? And most importantly, how is holographic duality provably true? "We look at this set of entangled cubits, and we evolve it in a way that has exactly the same physics as a gravitational wormhole." What does this mean exactly? If they demonstrated EPR with the quantum computer, how does this show EPR = ER?

[@TasX]

Buried inside the research paper you’ll find this quote “because nine qubits can be easily simulated on a classical computer, the results of this experiment cannot teach us anything that could not be learnt from a classical computation, and will not teach us anything new about quantum gravity.”

[@DavidMcCoul]

@@TasX Interesting, thanks! Although that doesn't mean they weren't able to empirically demonstrate a wormhole with their quantum computer. I'm just still unclear about the holographic duality, the key assumption for their experimental design. I should check out the paper myself

[@TasX]

@@DavidMcCoul For more context about what I said, a lot of the scientific community has been criticizing them because they hyped up something really normal. They didn't demonstrate a wormhole or anything. What they did was get a previous theory that possibly (and right now loosely) relates wormhole theory to quantum entanglement. Then they said "a quantum computer can quantum entangle" then did that on a quantum computer and called it a wormhole. It's like trying to fly by pulling on your shoelace. The only novel thing about this research was that they used machine learning to cut down the number of parameters needed for the wormhole simulation to work on the quantum computer. Notice I said simulation too. That's basically what it is. The wormhole has also been simulated on a classical computer before. And quantum computers have been used for more complex tasks before. So they didn't discover anything novel.

[@davehart9972]

its means give them more $$$ so they can dazzle the masses with BS

[@HMan2828]

This is an amazing proof of concept, but remember, they started with over 200 terms to simulate it fully, and an AI told them they could manage with 7. Once the experiment can be repeated with the full terms, then I'll believe they made wormhole. Still amazing physics though!

[@mindtherapy3753]

This was my thought too. But it won’t downplay the achievement this is uno. We aren’t even fully there yet with AI and quantum computing, so I’d take this with a grain of salt. Happy we’re thinking better than a century ago with the tools we currently have. The next couple of decades are going to be exciting ones for sure. PS: I’m not native English so my sentence structure maybe confusing. Lol. Forgive me

[@bakedbeings]

"simulated a wormhole"?

[@pablopereyra7126]

@@bakedbeings From what I understood, they made a virtual system that follows the laws of physics and made a wormhole in it. So, if the simulation follows the laws of physics, and it is possible to traverse a wormhole in it, then (supposedly) it would be possible in the real world too.

[@tiikis757]

@@pablopereyra7126 yes exactly. pretty dang cool

[@PimentelES]

That was basically fitting for observables

[@snakecharmer9072]

I know we are likely far from any sort of practical application, but its fun to imagine the possibilities of this phenomenon. If we could make wormholes like the one in this experiment in a predictable and continues way they may very well be the key to making more advanced quantum computers

[@Dennzer1]

so amazing

[@imEden0]

Unfortunately the headline is misleading. They just simulated one on a quantum computer, and got the same results as when they simulated a worm hole on a regular computer. It didn’t do anything new or interesting.

[@kavi5990]

@@imEden0 so are u saying that people calling this to be noble prize stuffs are just exaggerating (I don't have too much knowledge except for what they are)

[@imEden0]

@@kavi5990 well, most have been misled by the video. The video is intended to trick and deceive you, saying that we made a real wormhole. That is wrong, and was a publicity stunt. They did nothing new.

[@kavi5990]

@@imEden0 👍

[@ThePaulv12]

I didn't think quantum computers were a thing yet but there you go they are and they're so mature they can simulate wormholes!

[@Wildboy789789]

turns out quantum theory was in the 30s, i recently learnd the theory for quantum computers was in the early 70s, and theyve been working on them since the mid 90s... people dont realize these things are about 6 years away from being inside your PC at home, instead of 1s and0s yes's and no's, a quantum PC basically has good guessing built in and thinks more like a person

[@meows8603]

@@Wildboy789789 quantum computers still use 1s and 0s, it's just that the qubits are in a state of 1 and 0 at the same time. I.e., they're in a state of superposition until a measurement collapses it into a definitive state. Also they're entangled, so measuring the result of one of the qubits will tell the state of its pair, regardless of distance. Both properties allows quantum computers to work exponentially faster on some problems, as you said.

[@ziko317]

@@Wildboy789789 6 yrs away huh? A'ight. 🤡

[@ThePaulv12]

@@ziko317 LOL

[@matthewlillistone5943]

@@Wildboy789789 dream on

[@kyuzo3313]

😁So amazing to be alive to witness this!!! Well done and thanks to the team!

[@dallassegno]

so happy to see a cute cartoon with a compelling story that proved nothing? bravo

[@seth9466]

@@dallassegno People like you will always be around to doubt. Because regardless of peoples actions you will always elect to be a hater. Continue on in your small world without the idea that greater things are possible.

[@thepeasant269]

@@dallassegno pea brain

[@alucardnolifeking789]

@@seth9466 such people are narrow minded and stubborn and bitter, just wait when they get older, useless oxygen waste.

[@feral_orc]

@@dallassegno it's almost like the purpose of simulating this was just to see if it worked or something.. Which it did

[@embrown23]

Beautiful work!

[@coma-body-stilllife]

The cut at 9:38 linking their gestures is so satisfying.. .. ..

[@deutschluz]

Does anybody have a source on how they generated negative energy to "charge" the wormhole? That seemed important but was not talked about.

[@theyuragoon3226]

I don't but they said they made a space in the quantum computer and that space is the worm hole. I assume that the negative energy is a unspecified value of the quantum nature of the system that goes to the worm hole. Kind of like when there's a whirl pool on top of a body of water due to a salt mine under the earth being flooded once the space between the rock and the water is removed and gravity has pulled the first drops of water into the cavity. In that example gravity is being used to represent negative energy and is just a feature of the system like NE is to Quantum systems.

[@TasX]

They didn’t. They didn’t make a wormhole like what the video makes it seem. They’re only using a loose theory that might connect quantum entanglement to wormholes and basically said “oh since quantum computers can do quantum entanglement, we can probably run a wormhole simulation by using a quantum computer.” There’s no verification or real life wormhole made.

[@deutschluz]

@@TasX Sigh! the more I learn about the less I am impressed by the reporting.

[@TasX]

@@deutschluz Yeah most of the scientific community is criticizing the way they hyped this up. This kind of hype should be saved for real discoveries like the Higgs Boson, or else it will make them look bad.

[@pb9405]

For the people who are still somewhat confused, they did not create a wormhole, they made a simulation of a wormhole theory on a quantum computer.

[@Agnostic_Mind]

That oddly make me believe we actually living in a simulation

[@pog9238]

Whoever made the visuals, YOU ARE THE BEST VISUALS ARTIST EVER!!! THESE ARE THE BEST IVE EVER SEEN AND THANK YOU SO MUCH YOU BLESSED MY EYES!!

[@trck2bnkz]

it’s interesting that a lot of these “UAPs” resemble cubits

[@djpanncake]

I so incredibly much want Einstein to come back to life and see what happened since his discoveries, what we are now able to do, calculate and simulate with computers...it honestly is more than mindblowing

[@golbez3794]

einstein must be spinning in his grave...

[@MorvusMonvrus]

@@golbez3794 He's simultaneously spinning and not, and doesn't actualize as either until you dig him up for observation.

[@DoctorTimelord]

@@MorvusMonvrus schrodingers einstein?

[@Channel-xy2wj]

maybe he's aware

[@willahelmpowers4835]

@@golbez3794 idk about spinning, but he likely experienced many worm holes there years ago. ba-dum-ch

[@TheDerHeld]

Wow, beautifully done. The Interviews, the cut and the graphics are phenomenal. Thank you very much

[@WhatzzzUpWithYou101]

"That's a big quantum computer, just look at that computer chip," said a person hundreds of years from now

[@Campfire_Bandit]

Can't wait to see Sabine Hossenfelder chat about this next week!

[@twobyfour]

My thought exactly....

[@MrMctastics]

I just *know* that this is yet another overblown experimental result

[@JaskoonerSingh]

She might get stuck on the phrase "The mathematical equivalent of a wormhole"

[@DallasMay]

I was absolutely thinking the same thing. "I'll believe this only if Sabine goes postal on Twitter today."

[@MrMctastics]

@@JaskoonerSingh Is it anything else tho?

[@persianney]

A picture of a unicorn is not a unicorn.

[@butwhytho4858]

Underrated comment in all honesty

[@calummacgregor589]

I love how my experience in STEM helps give an idea of how all this works. How I have a rough idea of how all these parts work/come together, but I still understand so little.

[@emrahcoban4488]

Wait a minute..this video is fullscreen? How?? And omg it's 2023 and YT still can't figure this out?

[@thomascao-t8s]

Incredible video, excellent editing and extremely inspiring.

[@turtleheadboys5263]

Keep on opening the doors and pushing the limits, y'all are doing an awesome job! I'm sure E.P.R. would all be super proud of y'alls accomplishments.

[@Matt33318]

How did they produce negative energy to maintain the wormhole? With what kind of technique?

[@aelolul]

It was just a simulation. None of it was real. This is nothing but hype.

[@doodelay]

They sold the hell out of this idea but I gotta say I still don't know how they actually did what they did or if it it proves anything whatsoever.

[@coryhall561]

This is very fascinating and exciting!! It’s really exciting to see the gravitational physicist and quantum physicist coming together. It seemed to me that they clearly had to work together, but i wasn’t burdened by all the knowledge of the math. Lol. I really wish i understood more. Physics has always fascinated me, i should have gone to school for it.

[@bu5415]

@@dad1844 I would love proof if it is no hassle.

[@coryhall561]

@Russell pinuela what does this mean?

[@marshallsweatherhiking1820]

@@dad1844 The idea of sending something macroscopic through a wormhole is science fiction, but these experiments open up a pathway towards being able to test the unified models physicists and mathematicians have been playing around with for the past half century. Its exciting to at least be making progress towards bringing foundational theoretical physics back into the empirical realm.

[@bluegg996]

6:27 I love her so much, embodies every experimental physicist that has been ridiculed for the whole degree. It’s also amazing how there are experimentalists that both know GR and QFT, we at condensed matter just study the basics of QFT and that’s all

[@codywolfe556]

I’ve been working on my own hypothesis and this helped me make a huge breakthrough! When I was a kid I learned about general relativity and black holes. Once I learned about time dilation specifically it was over for me as far as obsessions go. 15 years later and here I am working on my own hypothesis where the questions I asked and answers I thought up were confirmed over the years as I learned and read more. I thought to myself once that black holes would pretty much halt the flow of time, and I learned not long after that I was right, one of the proudest moments I’ve ever had! I’ve always had a good intuition for these sort of ideas and thoughts. I wanna be clear I’m not trying to claim to be super smart or anything this is pretty much all I’m good at 😅

[@akaMyThought]

Awesome my mind does the same thing in a way.

[@leoterss]

@Jay R yeah ok buddy sure, can do this in C# lmaooo

[@IHamDogg]

Could the 4 Binaries of Quantom Computing represent the 4dimensions?

[@darkprose]

Is this a joke or are _you_ the joke? Because it’s one or the other.

[@elizabethstranger3122]

That's really awesome! Keep on following your intuition, wherever it leads you! Black holes, relativity, quantum mechanics, all of these ideas just keep blowing my mind! Have you ever read the book 'Eureka' by Edgar Allan Poe? That book is fascinating! It really inspired me to keep on speculating about the nature of the universe. That book was written in the early 19th century, and in it he proposes that the universe began from 'a primodial atom', as he called it, and that it not only had a beginning, but an end as well.

[@elizabethrogge7908]

When did this take place? Can you make another video to explain what happened to the information in the wormhole?

[@BlockCheddar]

It seems to me that the best way to tell if two theories are both true is to take the most radical and weird part of each theory and try to match them. If even the fringe cases match, it's pretty strong evidence that the two theories gel.

[@ArchieLundy]

Incredible work and possible tools for further investigation and insight BUT a tad overstated. No actual wormhole or actual negative energy have been created - just a quantum computer simulation.

[@jacobkinnaman8142]

Currently doing my undergrad senior paper on quantum entanglement, and this is just mind blowing. Really exciting news for the future. What a time to be alive!

[@kamilbro6106]

English student?

[@i2c_jason]

I'd love to hear more detail about this 'negative energy'. Like is it literal negative sign on the energy, or is it the cumulative action of a transfer function of positive energies fed through a machine learning system to get the arrangement just right? Perhaps like playing tricks between time and freq domains to get a destructive interference pocket or tunnel.

[@lostmic]

Interesting I would rather go with your first theory... since everything is based off of matter.

[@syntaxed2]

Leo Susskind/Juan Maldacena have proposed that Einstein-Rosen bridges and EPR entanglement are the same thing - This experiment is a boost to such proposal.

[@ClariceAust]

This universe is astounding. Congrats to the physicists in being able to open up to the rest of us, just how amazing it really is.

[@Dennzer1]

😂

[@Kraterlandschaft]

Credit to the camera man who took the risk and travelled all the way to and through the wormholes so we don't have to.

[@pstewart5443]

When I imagine a gravitational-based wormhole I see it being one-way, ie you have one ER Bridge that points to say Alpha Centauri where the higher gravity end is on that side, then a second coming back which has a higher gravitational pull on our end, like near the sun. Just a little thought about the structure of these things. I have two great regrets in my life. One is knowing I will die prior to seeing mankind learning to work together in a way which is in the best interest of each other. The second is more personal.

[@rhadiem]

Help push the world to a more moderate view which conserves the best of the past while also reaching forward towards the future.

[@MexicoAdventurer]

It's time to look into this as a form of "folded paper" space travel.

[@Raziel1818]

Awe struck. Amazing experiment, amazing video, amazing production, everything. Congrats to everyone involved!

[@southbayrickybobby5820]

Incredible. Let the record show, Alexander Zlokapa. First person in the history of humanity to create and see a wormhole

[@imEden0]

Unfortunately it was a simulated worm hole, which has been done before on classical computers. The quantum computer yielded the same results as the simulation ran on classical computers

[@feynmanschwingere_mc2270]

@@imEden0 All because of Einstein 😉. The greatest scientific mind of all time.

[@Gieling]

Thanks to the team for creating this fascinating documentary.

[@bentheuberdestroyer]

This is a foray into the ability to travel not just time but space. Allowing us to move forward backward and to any distance across our universe. When perfected. With the precise coordinates you could find yourself in any number of places. I hope those who find themselves in possession of this technology will use it responsibly while they travel the limits.

[@thentropist4707]

beautifully made video. Incredible that they even succeeding in making something of such complexity.

[@cybergothika6906]

Impressive, fantastic, I'm speechless. Congratulations also for the channel to keep things serious and straight to the point, but still attractive for people outside the knowledge yet. Great work, keep it up.

[@hercules71185]

I really hope your other videos are close to as well done as this. I'm going on a binge this week. This was incredibly well done. Great research and I am absolutely ecstatic about the new research. I can't wait for this to cross into consciousness. I wish I could get into this field myself.

[@MegaSahil009]

Is anyone going to answer "how they sent a negative energy pulse?" Like isn't negative energy impossible to make?

[@loushark6722]

So have they simulated a wormhole? You're not telling me they've actually created a real one?

[@simewn]

It takes one to simulate one.

[@andrewreynolds912]

I'm proud for the scientists for adjective that we could possibly go through a wormhole As a hard sci fi fan I'm very excited

[@davehart9972]

ya in an imaginary world that they made up.

[@andrewreynolds912]

​@@davehart9972it's still math they didn't create an actual wormhole

[@andrewreynolds912]

True

[@yomamadud77]

Sometimes I look at the world and I feel sad or disappointed with where we are. But then, I see that we manage to do things that we previously thought as impossible. It gives me so much hope, I am proud to be a sentient monkey!!!

[@SuperYtc1]

All monkeys are sentient. Those ones you consider not sentient and beneath you, you share 99% of DNA with.

[@solosailorsv8065]

Agreed; and I hope their funding is non-military, which would also be fantastically innovative too !

[@YogiMcCaw]

With all due respect: 1) all monkeys are sentient, but yah we know what you're saying ;-) and 2) of course the military is going to get onto this. Just think about it: if you work for DARPA on physics research, my guess is you're probably already writing a proposal to get funding for research into this.

[@figjamtanj8520]

12.50 I loved the presentation of this video, but my question is this. During the transference of the Qbit from one side of the the worm hole to the other side of the worm hole are the states exactly identical and if so how is that information preserved through the disassembly and reassembly of that information? Does this mean that there are sub quantum fields that act as place markers to preserve the information through the disassembly and reassembly phase? Or does the information remain whole and it is the wormhole that is forced to dilate to allow the information to maintain its identical identity through the transfer between the entrance and the exit points of the wormhole? And lastly, if the qbit is broken down further to allow for transference between the entrance and exit points can at any point/time/state be altered then recombined into another qbit which looks/behaves exactly the same as the original qbit but be different? I am showing my ignorance, but it would be like taking an exact copy of a clone but not being able to tell how much of the (wrong analogy, I'm sure) individuality would be kept identically intact? And how would it be tested for? Can there be an actual identical clone at any time during journey which would not destroy the original information or the destination information? Thank you for allowing me to be an armchair physicist. 😊

[@imEden0]

All of your questions still apply even if it was a simulation, but it should be known they didn’t actually create a wormhole. They simulated one, and pointlessly at that, since a classical computer could do it just the same.

[@specific_pseudonym]

Okay, real question here: What about what they did was different from standard quantum teleportation? I don't want to ruin hype, but this makes it sound like the wormhole doesn't need classical information to be reversible (that it implies one can traverse the distance between two points faster via the wormhole than they could by following the non-wormhole path...not FTL travel, but perhaps enough to violate some causal relationship forbidden in special relativity)

[@crazygamezockerXD]

@@thychairman5782 But at that point, if both are mathematically identical, the experiment doesn't give you any new information. You would have produced the same result where it just for quantum entanglement without wormholes. So why bother?

[@Cssaarr]

@@crazygamezockerXD I am not a phycisist, but, what do you mean it gives you no new info? If it shows you can build a system that works according to the math, isn`t the experimental confirmation itself "new info" ?

[@MrMctastics]

@@Cssaarr I gave ur mom some experimental confirmation

[@WishPL]

​@@crazygamezockerXD as video points out ER = EPR, it joins standard model of physics aka general relativity with quantum physics. It shows us that that Quantum teleportation is or is explained by standard model in the form of a phenomena of wormhole. In standard model wormholes are non-traversable but if we think about them from quantum perspective, the quantum information can traverse it. To bluntly summarise, what these bunch of wonderful people achieved are the following: 1. Wormholes can exist and are real thing as envisioned by Einstein-Rosen, this tells us that information can travel through space-time, we know it as quantum-entanglement and teleportation. This proves that Einstein and Rosen and other scientists were correct in theorizing wormholes. Quantum entanglement phenomenon has been extensively tested and recently was awarded Nobel Prize in Physics. This is now further explained by science. It is no longer a unexplained phenomena or as Einstein referred to it a spooky action at a distance. I can vividly imagine if Einstein heard about this science experiment and what it tells us he would have had 2nd happiest day of his life. 2. There are some properties that wormholes could teach us about and further the standard model of physics and quantum model of physics so both branches of science could advance and going forward we could potentially start to see emerging theories that will further join two branches of physics into more tightly-knit general model, also referred to by many as holy grail aka theory of everything, one unified model to explain it all.

[@specific_pseudonym]

My question about this is a much simpler one: The dream of all scifi enthusiasts is FTL travel. If a wormhole can be established between two points, and is traversable, those words spell "FTL travel" to most people. The question is whether this implies the possibility of FTL communications/travel. If it DOES, that's an even BIGGER deal then this video makes it out to be, and is an important consideration for public communications.

[@musicsansnotes]

I find physics fascinating and I'm so glad this appeared on my feed. I enjoyed this entirely too much. I believe I learned a little bit of what physicists do on a daily basis. I wouldn't be able to pass a Physics class if my life depended on it 🙃 😅 🙂

[@coryhall561]

I’m in the same boat. Lol…. It really is incredible though!!!

[@NathanHarrison7]

Excellent video. It’s absolutely incredible to think about the advancements and discoveries humankind has made in just the last 200 years. Exponential knowledge and discovery on top of exponential discovery and knowledge; each leading to new heights for humanity and new discoveries and knowledge. Exciting indeed! And thank you for making a video about quantum science that a layman like myself can actually understand and appreciate.

[@BosleyBeats]

Observation/Question: now that we have a worm hole, does this mean we now have the fundamental code to do advanced quantum debugging? The first thing that came to mind as I watched this video was we now can do a peek operation at the qbit state. So we can attach a watcher to a quantum variable and observe the superposition state while the qbit is shredded in the tunnel, essentially being able to run entangled experiments

[@tristanmisja]

No, because that would break superposition.

[@jct4418]

Imagine that, the computer showed the the simulation they asked it for, and they are all hilariously surprised that the sim allowed for the exact conditions they were hoping for. Almost makes you wonder if the quantum computer is impacted by its observer. 😂

[@A-Go-5]

Could it be possible that distant civilizations are sending signals to us via entangled qubits? i.e. rather than scanning the skies for electromagnetic signals (limited by the speed of light), should we be looking for unusual patterns in particles here that are being manipulated from far away as a method of communication 'through' space as opposed to 'across' physical space?

[@drishalballaney]

This is actually...a brilliant idea ngl

[@T1Oracle]

There is no indication that this would enable distant communication or faster than light communication. So no. This is not your sci-fi wormhole, it's just a quantum computer with quantum tunneling.

[@GarrettBlackmon]

Nope unfortunately. I don't know what would happen if you tried it but you can be certain it wouldn't work. If you allow for FTL communication, you are also breaking causality, because you could send a message which changes an event, but for some observers, the event would change before the message is sent. This is the time paradox, things are happening before their causes.

[@Regularsshorts]

Wormhole-Entanglement Duality Wow

[@kinanhamwi]

Can we have the title adjusted? I had considered Quanta Magazine as a reliable source until this video came out. This is overhyped.

[@BeanBurrito9]

they also avoid using the word simulation and the paper they wrote is completely useless. We've simulated them the same way on normal computers, this "discovery" literally makes no difference

[@amogus5902]

this is beyond unreal, i can't believe that this is actually being discovered in my lifetime

[@neuroncrux5937]

This is what the public is allowed to know about. The real tech is always at least 50-100 years ahead of what we are told. Fact.

[@smokajunt]

@@neuroncrux5937 based and if we were be able to manipulate black holes and wormholes we would be able to know look into the past which could expose alot of controversies e.g 9/11.

[@NicoWardMusic]

Wow! I’ve always wondered what’s on the other side of a wormhole. Do they serve as passage ways to the parallel universe? Are they entry points into other realms within our current universe as we understand it to be?

[@lunchbox1553]

They describe it in simple terms in the beginning of the video. It is simply a bridge between two points of space, nothing in the realm of fantasy.

[@imEden0]

@@lunchbox1553 other universes could exist, but there’s no way to test it or anything. Not fantasy per se, but no way to prove it unless somebody happens to find it.

[@lunchbox1553]

@@imEden0 That's not the point. The point is that Nico projecting his fantasies on this specific experiment doesn't work.

[@imEden0]

@@lunchbox1553 yes. Such as the fantasy that we have created a wormhole

[@lunchbox1553]

@@imEden0 Depends on your definition of "wormhole". If you mean we created ones like in movies, then obviously not, but you can watch the video again or do further research into the experiment if you aren't satisfied or if you don't actually understand what they managed to do.

[@pradeepkumar-lz9cf]

When i was very young I used to wonder why cant quantum physics have proof like chemistry but after watching this video I feel very happy that in no time warm hole will help us not only understand gravity but i do see possibilities of time travel. Future looks exciting ! kudos to google and research team for amazing break through.

[@hitbox7422]

Its a simulation of a few Wormhole properties applied to a (still simulated) traversing Quantum particle, if anyone in here thought about "artificial wormholes". It's nothing close to a real wormhole, although the implications are huge and very interesting. It shows that there are in fact symmetries between Quantum- and Relativistic mechanics that we can use to derive shared properties both systems have in common. Im rooting for those who endeavour in this quest for knowledge. Only problem i see is google, they got the most powerful quantum system at the moment, but as we speak silicon electric nuclear resonance systems rise to be the most useful tool in this particular field. Since google derives its system from more "traditional" effects, i think its not the best horse to place bets on. Just my 2 cents on this topic.

[@yinkstaiwo7622]

This could technically be the very early stages of Building a time travel machine.

[@monkeybrains]

I'm from the future and you are correct - it was

[@wylde678]

@@monkeybrains Yeah, but now you're from the past.

[@marcosalazar4682]

I think it's literally teleportation. We've managed to entangle atoms at 20 miles distance. We could instantly transfer information 20 miles. We could entangled atoms everywhere, the transfer rate would be insane

[@mdl222]

Much gratitude to those pushing the limits of our understanding AND sharing it with the rest of us!! 👍🙏✌

[@sciencelover9490]

Really amazing, but what will this discovery offer? Will we be able to travel through time through this wormhole?

[@hemanth129]

*Because of the economic crisis that always comes up the best thing to be on every wise individual’s mind or list is to invest in different streams of income that’s not depending on the government to generate funds.*

[@ShauryaVyas]

*In spite of the economic downturn and inflation crisis we all face, I'm so happy ☺I have been earning $60,000 returns from my $9,000 investment every 14days*

[@ginaluciano4069]

tf! HOW? I would appreciate if you show me how to go about it., Pls can you list the platforms?

[@lucasgraham6907]

Stumbled across Cryptocurrency trading platform of Mrs Kathleen Breitman, my financial life has totally changed😢🥺

[@robinwhite-gough3331]

Her trading income stream is too notch, I also trade with her company. I've made 60k so far trading with her guidance/mentorship

[@ginaluciano4069]

How can I reach out to this Mrs Kathleen? I urgently need her management on my INVESTMENTS!

[@AnuragPandey-dx6rn]

if this is a wormhole then video calling is teleportation, thinking is a parallel universe, and dreams are where you really experience the many worlds of the multiverse.

[@martins2246]

quantum mechanical researchers have lost their grip on english. "Simulation" is obviously, glaringly omitted all over this thing.

[@jr.jackrabbit10]

I feel so lucky to be young at this time in history. I was born into an age of rapid scientific discovery the likes of which had never been seen before, and it seems that rate of discovery is not going to be slowing down any time soon.

[@lynnclaywood4043]

How oddly fitting that entanglement ended up as a duality in physics. Almost like wormholes and entanglement are, themselves, entangled!

[@icarys]

More quantum physics please, Quanta!