"Quantum Mechanics supports my religion"

[@DDRational_]

Support me at: Buymeacoffee: buymeacoffee.com/scienceisdope Patreon: www.patreon.com/scienceisdope_ YT Membership: kzbin.info/door/g--ENXdDpXh5LyLigolg2gjoin UPI: scienceisdope@icici (QR Code available on www.scienceisdope.com/support )

[@nothing29717]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/Zp-ypX-gbbqMedksi=fZTsEn5Jls1rMG0k Now debunk this

[@haithamjalalmasoodi4741]

Pranav reacting to the religious Pranav

[@sydneymonteiro8409]

Lol😂😂😂

[@aaryanmandal4295]

😂😂

[@Scale_69]

Lmao 🤣 😂

[@palashkale]

Tbh, I thought he was reacting to his older video, until I looked at the thumbnail properly

[@TurdBoi666]

😭😭

[@mithilbhoras5951]

Oh my God, that dude looks just like you Pranav if you shaved your head and smoked grass 🤣

[@siddharthchougale3732]

Pranav debunks the hippie version of himself🤣

[@nandish7048]

Atheist pranav vs religious pranav (in parallel universe). Lol

[@combatcritique]

Most people saying this have never read any standard textbook on quantum mechanics like Griffiths, sakurai etc .They just blabber random science fiction words. It works because 99% don't understand eigen values, perturbation, Schrodinger equation, particle in a box etc

[@oogaboogacute]

the world is made on Unreal Engine 6 💀💀

[@thesofthuman]

📌India best Rational & scientific channel 🙏 1. vimoh 2. human with science 3. Bioshala 4. logical aayaam 5. science is dope 6. Arpit explains 7. Science journey 8. आसान शब्दों में - Kurzgesagt 9. Himanshu ka lecture 10. DD rational 11. जिज्ञासु बने रहें - TED-Ed 📌 For advance science with trusted research sources 🙏 1. Scishow 2. Be smart 3. Insider science 4. Stated clearly 5. Pbs Eons 6. TED-Ed 7. Minute earth 8. Freemededucation 9. Real Science 10. Alex O'Connor (atheist) 11. Genetically Modified Skeptic (atheist) 12. Doctor Mike 13. The Atheist Experience 14. Rationality Rules

[@rishabhtripathi3859]

Richard Dawkins

[@miraadi97]

Change bro😂.

[@ryepepper]

Where did you get this bs list

[@rishabhtripathi3859]

@@miraadi97 from mom

[@tylerdurden4709]

Hi Pranav, Please do a video on debunking the conspiracies around Mount Kailash. Like some people are saying, there will be a scientific phenomenon like time dilation. Like time runs three times faster when you climb Mount Kailash. It sounds too unscientific.

[@pradeepgantyada671]

Channel logo is excellent. DD NATIONAL AND DD RATIONAL.

[@AmanUpadhyay-g3t]

Pausing video in the start to comment, elaboration, script sounds good keep doing it

[@fallingintofilm]

You'll have to debunk Amish Tripathi's new video on science and religion sir, seems like a necessity at the moment,

[@nandish7048]

Great video pranav!

[@meghrajdadapatil9148]

Multiverce of Pranav 😂😂😂

[@SoumyaranjanPandey-do8ke]

Very well explained ❤❤❤🙏🙏👌

[@zulfikarali5627]

Thanks

[@RajeshKumar-122]

Hello sir . I would like you to make reaction video on puri shankaracharya 's videos where he has explained " the reason behind the varna system , untouchability and shudras denial to enter into temples" scientifically and logically

[@Devilhunter69]

The title is so funny lol

[@Tejasthegr8]

If the world is mentally conscious or spiritual. So it means world is something like unreal. So the Varna system should be unreal right?

[@DDRational_]

Where did the varna system come from?

[@Tejasthegr8]

@@DDRational_" Varna system is a dimension. U can understand it only when you practice yoga and do semen retention" - Shit guru

[@AquarianMan]

the varna system is vyavaharika satya jati-varna is also vyavaharika satya - though it stinks the world (multiplicity) is neither real nor unreal - and only the one consciousness - is the truth that's how i would frame the claims we can discuss their validity at length if interested.

[@abi3751]

I feel sorry for the fanatics who liked this cmnt thinking you're one among them. 😂

[@AquarianMan]

@@abi3751 care to explain?

[@subhendugiri5018]

Though it doesn't sound good, but truth is, all these so-called influencers are just dishonest and teasing (spoiling) weak minds with their good oratory skill. They may start from anything else but will finish with predefined goal. To react for such content, we are putting so many efforts while content-creator puts minimum effort to create content! Ideally, such content (or content creator) doesn't deserve any time and effort from intellectuals, like Pranav. Only in other intention, attempt can be justified if it helps weaker minds to unfollow those dishonest content creators. But, I believe, those weaker minds are already damaged, and they will never follow Pranav's channel or check Pranav's content.

[@utkarshswaroop_0306]

Reminds me of Hitchens brothers 😂 Love the video❤

[@daviddexter25]

THUMBNAIL LOOKS LIKE TWO PRANAV ATHEIST ONES AND RELIGIOUS ONES LOL🤣🤣🤣

[@AllahHuAkbar-g9z]

Love you video Religin should be practiced independant of science

[@subhradipgiri9723]

Make a video on the topic of ❝Observer Effect❞ please.

[@misraaditya9213]

Appreciate this, not least because this fallacy and claim are more common than I'd be comfortable with. Minor nitpick at 2:58 - Science has evidence, not proof. That's more a mathematical and logical thing, carrying significant epistemological differences (maths is a priori, science is a posteriori) :)

[@misraaditya9213]

4:00 A major flaw here is that consciousness is not as neatly defined as most scientific and mathematical concepts.

[@TamalRayMahapatra]

Can you make a video about paranormal activities and ghost hunting? Apparently there's a lot of people believing in that kinda stuff So many that I am thinking that they might be true and honest (which makes me look dumb)

[@darkside6610]

Well these things may not exist but nobody can say with definite proof that they don't exist. I personally have had a few instances when I literally can't say what's true or what's false. I'm not saying they are real because it can't be proved but this can't be disproved either. Science doesn't discard the belief but says there is no evidence to support it or it can't be proved because they don't follow our physical laws. See anything beyond our current understanding would look like magic but it isn't. Maybe one day we will have a definition of what they are.

[@literallynotavailable]

religious pranav is really onto something

[@RohitPatil-vi8hi]

Please make video on yoga and pranayama because it is scientifically proven I think😅

[@DDRational_]

There is no such thing as "scientifically proven"

[@RohitPatil-vi8hi]

​@@DDRational_I am also confused on that please make full fledged video on your main channel it's an request😊

[@0xbinarylol]

Quantum mechanics is so misunderstood it's like weapons for pseudoscience 😅. Most people understand double slit experiment is like one electron passing from both slit at a one time(not actually and not measured too because measuring it destroys Quantum super position) actually We named this state is Quantum super position and it can't be explained by any word or sentence it's strange and didn't uncovered until now. What we are doing is we are trying to explain mathematically not verbally.

[@WhyAnkurGautam]

Pranav in parallel universe 😅

[@rohitkashyapx]

Can we get Pdawg back as an experiment for 1 video?

[@aaditkamat4995]

My main issue with Pranav and Vimoh is not the fact that they are atheists-I respect people having different viewpoints-but, in my opinion, that they spend a lot of time attacking different views. I get it; in India especially, people tend to get duped quite often by believing certain figureheads who confidently spout pseudoscience, and as concerned citizens, we should be highlighting and debunking these. However, asserting that scientific methods are the only way we can understand the universe also lacks intellectual humility. Many indigenous cultures have had their own ways of looking at nature and engaging in practices that seem absurd to us modern humans. In fact, that became the root of how they had their lives uprooted through colonialism-because the Europeans who had progressed through the Scientific Revolution saw these communities as "backward" and their gods and religions as "primordial.". They were living in lands that were rich with resources and had a symbiotic rather than extractive relationship with nature, which was then exploited over time by setting in place capitalistic systems that made the colonial masters richer. I don't necessarily agree with everything that is said in religious texts-not to forget that we are interpreting them through the lens of modern society, and probably a lot of the ideas mentioned in these texts have been diluted, misinterpreted, and lost in translation-but I do feel that the core ideas across many religions, spiritual in nature, are related to the oneness of humankind and perceiving God in their own different ways. You can think of God as a supernatural entity that is vast and hence, by definition, beyond our understanding. Just as the entire cosmos continues to exist outside whatever drama we humans create here on this small - at least in relation to the observable universe - yet beautiful planet we call Earth. It reminds me of that dialogue from the film PK about how "there are two Gods: the one we have created and the one that exists beyond our comprehension." Due to our scientific and technological progress over the last few centuries, we as a species have grown rather arrogant. We have gotten this idea that we are a supreme species and that we are the masters of the universe. However, once we peel back the layers and embrace the attitude of curiosity, we can then begin to question the nature of reality and decondition ourselves from the ideas that are prevalent in society. Different societies and cultures have their own way of seeing things and none can be inherently evaluated as right or wrong, but the problem comes when the clash of ideas puts us in a place of "us vs them", and we try to attack our opponents, rather than trying to find a way to live in harmony and work towards the "greater good".

[@rishabhtripathi3859]

It was hypothesis by Max Planc.

[@TerminalAddict]

quotes are not hypothesis he just said what he felt

[@rishabhtripathi3859]

@@TerminalAddict Hypothesis is the same thing

[@AquarianMan]

quantum mechanics doesn't support hindu / buddhist religion hindu / buddhist metaphysics makes claims that seem similar to / do not contradict certain quantum mechanical results one needs to to be careful in how one applies logic here

[@SussyBaka-uq6nf]

I'm a buddhist and I agree this statement. Buddhist teachings is based upon suffering and the cessation of suffering, some of it's teachings may be similar to quantum physics but the context is different.

[@NileshKumar-nr2vj]

🎉🎉

[@Luffy-3D2Y-]

Kumbh k mele me bichhday huye bhai lag rahe hai dono ..😅😅😅

[@debarpanmedhi]

Bro make videos on Tantriks

[@VishwadeepShinde]

👍

[@Fantomstranger]

Engagement

[@Chopped_Liver]

Well to be honest the quantum mechanics doesn't even support quantum mechanics

[@shreyasr1989]

Are you a materialist ?

[@raghavnamasivayam8706]

Well pranav then why do you take dieticians to be the ultimate source of nutrition when most are peddling ana (amercican nutrition association)cr*p well why don't you consider archaeology and other sources which show foods aren't just calories based

[@1080lights]

What the hell does “archaeology and other sources” mean?

[@raghavnamasivayam8706]

@1080lights archaeology to show that humans diet wasn't the junk that professional eaters eat and other sources are evidences from populations of countries

[@nikhilnicky7810]

SCIENCE IS THE NEW RELIGION...REAL RATIONALIST..WILL NEVER CONDEMN ANYTHING..

[@anirban7493]

Too many times have I seen the Observer effect being misinterpreted and misused as something related to the consciousness of the observer. I am studying Quantum mechanics as a part of GATE physics syllabus, let me clarify this once and for all. A quantum particle is described by it's wave function or state | Ψ ⟩. Now this state contains all the information about the particle and can itself be expressed as a summation of other states , this is called superposition. Eg. let state | Ψ ⟩ represent the spin state of an electron | Ψ ⟩ = α •| ↑ ⟩ + β •| ↓ ⟩ where the term α in front of the state | ↑ ⟩ represent the square root of the probability of the electron residing in state | ↑ ⟩ (spin up state) and β in front of | ↓ ⟩ represents the square root of the probability of finding the electron in spin down state. The electron doesn't have a specific spin until we measure it, but when we do measure it we never find it in state | ψ⟩, we either find it in spin up stae | ↑ ⟩ with a (α² × 100) % chance or we find it in spin down state | ↓ ⟩ with a (β²× 100)% chance. But wait, what do we mean by measurement in this context? To understand this we need to see what actually happens when we measure the electron spin, we pass it through an inhomogenus magnetic field, this magnetic field disturbs the state | Ψ ⟩ and forces the electron to assume either state | ↑ ⟩ or state | ↓ ⟩ with the said probabilities. This is called the collapse of the wave function. You see, it is the magnetic field that disturbed the electron and collapsed the wave function, not the consciousness of the experimenting scientist. In general the collapse of the wave function is a result of an interaction of the system with the factors and influences of the outside world, and that interaction can either be induced by the the action of a conscious observer trying to measure the system or it may be induced by mundane natural factors, for example say it naturally cane under the influence of an inhomogenus magnetic field. The observer or consciousness has little to do with it. Note: In this particular example, it happens to be the case that, α = β = 1/√2 this means (α²×100)% = (β²×100)% = 50% . This means, upon measurement, there is a 50 % chance that we will find the electron to be in spin up state | ↑ ⟩ and there is a 50% chance that we'll find the electron to be in spin down state | ↓ ⟩.

[@99eigencharu]

Another way to think about it is that the observer gets entangled to one of the states of the electron.

[@anirban7493]

@@99eigencharu Yes, the many world's interpretation uses this convention.

[@Shubhwise]

Are you alive???

[@TamalRayMahapatra]

Can you make a video about paranormal activities and ghost hunting? Apparently there's a lot of people believing in that kinda stuff So many that I am thinking that they might be true and honest (which makes me look dumb)