My main issue with Pranav and Vimoh is not the fact that they are atheists-I respect people having different viewpoints-but, in my opinion, that they spend a lot of time attacking different views. I get it; in India especially, people tend to get duped quite often by believing certain figureheads who confidently spout pseudoscience, and as concerned citizens, we should be highlighting and debunking these. However, asserting that scientific methods are the only way we can understand the universe also lacks intellectual humility. Many indigenous cultures have had their own ways of looking at nature and engaging in practices that seem absurd to us modern humans. In fact, that became the root of how they had their lives uprooted through colonialism-because the Europeans who had progressed through the Scientific Revolution saw these communities as "backward" and their gods and religions as "primordial.". They were living in lands that were rich with resources and had a symbiotic rather than extractive relationship with nature, which was then exploited over time by setting in place capitalistic systems that made the colonial masters richer. I don't necessarily agree with everything that is said in religious texts-not to forget that we are interpreting them through the lens of modern society, and probably a lot of the ideas mentioned in these texts have been diluted, misinterpreted, and lost in translation-but I do feel that the core ideas across many religions, spiritual in nature, are related to the oneness of humankind and perceiving God in their own different ways. You can think of God as a supernatural entity that is vast and hence, by definition, beyond our understanding. Just as the entire cosmos continues to exist outside whatever drama we humans create here on this small - at least in relation to the observable universe - yet beautiful planet we call Earth. It reminds me of that dialogue from the film PK about how "there are two Gods: the one we have created and the one that exists beyond our comprehension." Due to our scientific and technological progress over the last few centuries, we as a species have grown rather arrogant. We have gotten this idea that we are a supreme species and that we are the masters of the universe. However, once we peel back the layers and embrace the attitude of curiosity, we can then begin to question the nature of reality and decondition ourselves from the ideas that are prevalent in society. Different societies and cultures have their own way of seeing things and none can be inherently evaluated as right or wrong, but the problem comes when the clash of ideas puts us in a place of "us vs them", and we try to attack our opponents, rather than trying to find a way to live in harmony and work towards the "greater good".

I'm not an atheist , and believe in and pray to god . But, I don't practise superstitious beliefs and practises of Hinduism . Hinduism itself is all about preaching people that you don't need to do fancy rituals to pray to god. I think a bunch of infiltrators entered hinduism and created all those fake stories , to further their agenda .

When anyone says 'God did it', he/she is insulting God himself. Every religion says, Human is the supreme creation of God. Which is true. Human has brain, intelligence, thinking ability and a mind of his/her own to understand the world around him. By applying Logic, Science, Reason, he can understand the world and survive here but this "religious" folks do the opposite. Instead of understanding an unusual phenomena, they name it "God's act". An animal also perceives things this way, like not God for it but something some power or anything else. So what is the difference between you and that animal? What is the use of God's supreme being then?

You can make an informative video about the Saint called, "Dada Guru" and he is alive still now and it's being heard about him that he did not eat solid food for few years and just drank water of narmada river and staying well now. He accepted come to a news channel's interview and many things were discussed there. If possible, try to visit him personally.

After 1 yr of this video, now you can check our textbooks. ☺️ Luv from ❤🇵🇰

1:35 Axioms are experimentally verified truths.

1. Equivocation Fallacy Definition: Using a term or concept in a misleading way to shift the argument. In this case, equating religious belief with a mathematical truth (2+2=4) is invalid. Mathematical truths are demonstrable, verifiable, and universal, while the divine origin of a religious text is a matter of faith, not demonstrable fact. 2. Appeal to Tradition Definition: Assuming something is true because it has been accepted or passed down for a long time. The argument implies that because the teachings of the religion have been passed down through a chain of individuals (just like mathematical knowledge), its divine origin should not be questioned. However, the validity of mathematics is based on logic and proof, while the divine origin of scripture cannot be verified through the same process. 3. False Analogy Definition: Comparing two things that are not sufficiently similar in relevant aspects. The process of learning mathematics through teachers and proving its validity independently is not comparable to accepting the religious text as the word of God based on faith. Mathematical knowledge can be tested and verified through empirical means, while religious claims are inherently metaphysical and cannot be tested in the same way. 4. Circular Reasoning (Implied) Definition: Using the conclusion as a premise in the argument. The answer seems to assume that the religious text mentioned is unquestionably divine and attempts to support this by analogizing it to unquestioned truths in mathematics. This assumes the conclusion without providing evidence for it. 5. Red Herring Definition: Introducing an irrelevant point to distract from the original question. The question asks for evidence of the text being spoken by God, while the answer diverts to a discussion about how mathematical knowledge is passed down, avoiding the original point entirely. Scientific and Logical Distinction Mathematical Knowledge: Based on proofs, logical reasoning, and empirical validation. Universally consistent and does not depend on faith. Religious Belief: Based on faith, tradition, and subjective experience. Not subject to empirical verification or falsification.

1. Claim: "Temples are manifestation circuits with yantras as chips, idols for visualization, and cosmic energy transmitters" Logical Fallacy: Misappropriation of Scientific Terms A yantra is a geometric design often used in meditation and religious practices. While it has spiritual significance in Hinduism, likening it to a "chip in a phone" is scientifically inaccurate. Chips are silicon-based semiconductor devices designed to manipulate electrical signals. A yantra has no such material properties or demonstrated technological functions. The concept of "cosmic energy" as used here is vague and unscientific. While cosmic radiation (high-energy particles from space) exists, there is no evidence that temples "absorb" it or that pyramids focus it in a meaningful way. Scientific Explanation: Temples often have pyramidal structures because they are architecturally stable and aesthetically pleasing, not because they channel cosmic energy. Yantras and idols are cultural and psychological tools, serving as focal points for meditation and prayer. The benefits of prayer or meditation arise from psychological and neurological effects, not energy transmission. 2. Claim: "Mantras add energy codes to the system" Logical Fallacy: Unsupported Attribution of Power to Sound Mantras are sequences of words or sounds, often in Sanskrit, believed to have spiritual power. While chanting mantras can have psychological and physiological benefits (e.g., calming the mind or reducing stress), there is no evidence that they "add energy codes" to a temple or manipulate physical reality. Scientific Explanation: Sound is a mechanical wave that requires a medium (air, water) to propagate. Chanting mantras creates sound waves that can affect the immediate environment (e.g., through resonance in an enclosed space) but not "manifest" energy or influence the cosmos. Positive effects of mantras are better explained through neuroscience: rhythmic chanting can activate the parasympathetic nervous system, promoting relaxation. 3. Claim: "The kumbam (spire) acts as a transmitter" Logical Fallacy: Conflating Architectural Symbolism with Physical Function The kumbam (kalasha) on top of temples is a symbolic structure, often made of metal or stone, representing the culmination of spiritual effort or energy. It has no demonstrated ability to "transmit" energy in the scientific sense. Scientific Explanation: For a structure to function as a transmitter, it would need to be part of a circuit with electrical components like antennas and oscillators. Temples lack such components. Claims of energy transmission are rooted in metaphorical or symbolic interpretations, not empirical science. 4. Claim: "Prayers manifest energy into reality" Logical Fallacy: Magical Thinking There is no scientific evidence that prayers directly cause physical changes in the external world. While prayer and meditation can influence one's mindset and actions (thus indirectly affecting outcomes), attributing causation to a mystical process lacks evidence. Scientific Explanation: Psychological studies suggest that prayer or intention-setting can enhance focus, resilience, and goal-directed behavior, leading to better outcomes. This is not "manifestation" but an example of cognitive-behavioral effects. 5. Claim: "Millions of people praying empower the circuit" Logical Fallacy: Argument from Popularity The number of people engaging in a practice does not validate its scientific efficacy. Billions of people believe in varying religious practices, but belief alone does not equate to physical or metaphysical truth. Scientific Explanation: Collective practices like group meditation or prayer can foster a sense of community and shared purpose. Any "power" arises from social and psychological cohesion, not mystical circuits. 6. Claim: "33 million Gods for desires and fears" Logical Fallacy: Conflating Symbolism with Literal Truth The "33 million Gods" in Hinduism is misinformation. Originally, the Vedic texts spoke of 33 Devas (divine forces), not millions of gods. Scientific Explanation: The variety of deities in Hinduism reflects the complexity of human psychology, This diversity serves a psychological function, not a scientific one. Broader Issues with the Argument 1. Misuse of Science Terms: Words like "manifestation circuit," "energy codes," and "transmitter" are borrowed from modern science but lack rigorous definitions or empirical evidence in this context. This is a common tactic in pseudoscience to lend credibility to mystical claims. 2. Absence of Empirical Evidence: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. No scientific study has demonstrated that temples or idols function as described in the claim. 3. Misrepresentation of Religion and Tradition: Hindu practices are deeply symbolic, psychological, and cultural. Attempting to retrofit them into scientific concepts does a disservice to both science and religion.

Stop these idiots who say there are "33 million" gods in Hinduism. NO! 33 Koti means 33 types. And apart from this that video is as usual "cyber zeal", "abhi and niyu" video.

Atheism is illegal and punishable by death in Saudi Arabia.., Saudi Arabia declared Atheists as terrorists back in 2014.., “Indeed, those who disbelieve and die while they are disbelievers - upon them will be the curse of Allah and of the angels and of mankind, [cast] into the Hellfire, wherein they will abide eternally. Never will the punishment be lightened for them, and never will they be reprieved.” - Qur'an 2:161-162 .. Hadith by Sahih Bukhari: “Whoever changes his religion, kill him.” (Sahih Bukhari, 9:84:57) This hadith is aimed at apostates meaning the people who leave Islam..

So everytime an Indian eats with his hand, he releases a domain expansion.

Ye takala kathawachak khud ek rakshas hai to purano k pat katha ko apmanit karta hai Jhooti stories sunata hai

They ate with hands because they didn't had the understanding of utensils. Even when they were taught, they refused to leave savagery.

The argument presented by Sheldon is an example of the fine-tuning argument for the existence of God. It posits that the fundamental constants of the universe are so precisely calibrated to support life that it implies the existence of a designer, often identified as God. While the argument has emotional appeal, it is flawed on several grounds, both logical and scientific. Let’s address the fallacies and debunk it: 1. Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Ignorance The fine-tuning argument assumes that since we don't currently understand why the constants of nature are what they are, the only explanation must be a divine creator. This is a form of the appeal to ignorance fallacy (arguing from a lack of evidence to a conclusion). 2. Logical Fallacy: False Dichotomy The argument presents two options: The universe is finely tuned by God. The universe is random and chaotic. This ignores other possibilities, such as: A multiverse theory, where multiple universes exist with varying constants, and we happen to be in one where the conditions support life. Unknown natural principles that dictate the constants. 3. Misunderstanding Probability and Necessity The argument often assumes that the constants could have been otherwise and that their exact values are improbable. However: We have no evidence to suggest that the constants of nature can vary independently. The constants might be the result of deeper laws of physics we do not yet understand, making their values inevitable rather than "fine-tuned." Scientific Explanation The Anthropic Principle Weak Anthropic Principle: We observe the universe as life-permitting because we exist. If the constants were different, we wouldn't be here to observe them. This doesn’t imply a divine designer; it's a simple tautology. Strong Anthropic Principle: Suggests the constants are the way they are because they must allow for life. This is speculative but doesn't require divine intervention. The Multiverse Hypothesis Modern cosmology suggests that our universe might be one of many in a multiverse. Each universe could have different constants. In a vast number of universes, it's statistically inevitable that some will have life-permitting conditions. Fine-Tuning Is Not Necessarily for Life The argument assumes that the universe is fine-tuned specifically for life. However: Life as we know it depends on these constants, but alternative forms of life might exist under different constants. The universe appears to be "fine-tuned" for creating black holes and empty space, not specifically for life, as life occupies an insignificant fraction of the universe. --- Debunking: No Need for a Designer 1. Emergent Properties: Just because something is improbable does not mean it requires a designer. Snowflakes, for example, have intricate designs, but they arise naturally due to the laws of physics. 2. Limits of Human Understanding: Our current understanding of the universe is incomplete. Claiming a divine explanation halts scientific inquiry rather than advancing it. 3. Naturalistic Explanations Are Sufficient: The constants of the universe may be a product of symmetry breaking, quantum mechanics, or deeper physical laws. There is no evidence that divine intervention is required to explain them. --- Conclusion The fine-tuning argument is not a scientific proof of God's existence but rather a theological assertion based on gaps in current knowledge. While the constants of the universe are indeed fascinating, invoking a deity to explain them is unnecessary. Science continues to explore these mysteries without resorting to supernatural explanations.

Everything she say is false but one thing is true is that she is beautiful!

Fireworks was created by accident in China in 2nd century.. So is he telling us, that particular scripture was written after that?!? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Pranav, there is a bit of newance to consider here others than calories. Red meat is very high in LDL cholesterol which is not good for ur heart. Abt the cancer claim I am not sure but red meat for sure a cause for heart problems and gall bladder stones you can look up the evidence.

Sir, sir with your video I understand why Left loves Islam because they are hypocrites like you. On ground, I went with many riders on Ola, uber bikes who are Muslims and my roommates are Muslims where I am pure vegetarian. Nothing is there to raise voice for one community. Left has agenda just as you. Kamlesh Tiwari, Kanhaiya Kumar also lynched.

like tf what the fuck is this kind of left i will say i am slightly left and as an atheist i have a subtle negative opinion of all religion its not that i have a soft corner for a muslim guy over a hindu person its more i have a soft corner for non heinous people i think that muslims or hindus arent the ones to be defended the ones to be defended are innocents yes i have a soft spot for taxi muslim driver that is not because of islam or islam is being threatened or some bs its because the poor innocent guy is being attacked for his religious beliefs let it be hindu christian or islam beliefs this is the most i have disagreed with you

😂😂 love your expressions.

अच्छा फिर gautra भी angrezo ne hi banaye होंगे 😂 unke pass yahi kaam tha kya? Lagata hai बातें angrezo ne hi likhi हैं

May he rest in peace. I have never read any of his works but he seems to have been a great man. Pranav I would like to say in the beginning I didnt like you much and had issues. But the more i watched more of you and learn about my culture and religion by reading the texts myself I found my answers that Hinduism does not contain science at all nor does it contain any pseudoscience. However several of its ideas can be compatible with science. Its a work of logical and philosophical ideas designed for the people to follow and base their lives on. Our rishis weren't smart in the sense they were scientific but extremely observant of human psychology and knew how to guide humanity the best way they could according to their times and possibly for the future. I've realised your not Anti-Hindu just someone who wants to expose the superstitious bullshit several babas and dharam gurus try to spread about Hinduism and make us rational and logical of our own beliefs. There is no harm in following beliefs that doesn't hurt anyone like performing a homam for shuddhi and things like that. I would like to thank you for makine me love my religion and culture even more but also giving me guidance to being rational and logical. Thank you.❤

No, it's not propaganda. It's called correlating chain of events.

I am indian muslim always hated ncert for being hard and tough language......now Thank God my ancestors choosed India

As soon as she mentioned Chakras, I was done. It was the same with Rajiv Malhotra. He was awesome with his pro Hindu arguments, until he collaborated with Nithyanand for the third eye nonsense , and I was done. Unless you can explain something to me without using words like Chakra, prana, positive and negative energy , vibration, soul/atma, I'm not interested in listening.

Why is people obsessed about proving wrong a yoga teacher when he speaks about chemistry? It's like complaining that your doctor doesn't know about history. It's the one who asked the one who should wonder why he or she went to the doctor to learn history. Your doctor is not worse if he answers your random questions.

Hello this is Dr Rupali.. Shantanu s wife..thanx for making such a lovely video👍🙏

I swear. They are doing things in tbe name of ayurveda as Sadguru does in the name of spirituality

Ok when this guy backs up Oreo i was like thats enough internet for today.And bunch of people supporting him in comment section.😂😅

Believing isn't evidence again even if some scientists quote it or not. Need proper research behind that without any evidence they can't get Nobel prize 🏆

Quantum mechanics is so misunderstood it's like weapons for pseudoscience 😅. Most people understand double slit experiment is like one electron passing from both slit at a one time(not actually and not measured too because measuring it destroys Quantum super position) actually We named this state is Quantum super position and it can't be explained by any word or sentence it's strange and didn't uncovered until now. What we are doing is we are trying to explain mathematically not verbally.

dada you forgot Vimoh

do not waste your and people's time showing some one wrong. Instead spend more time on reading and researching scriptures in more depth.

22:03- Ayurveda is pseudo science😂😂. Okay so i finally understood this guy whole point.

09:55 have this person ever see his own video and thinks the same??

Making comments on ones effort is very easy, before you comment, show your potential, try to bring some unknown facts to public rather than wasting time commenting on someone’s hard work..

This was smthng that I used to ponder all the time, thanks bro for this beautiful explanation. ❤

Much support from Pune❤

Hey atleast give what ans. You gave to those andhbhakts who always put Muslim and Christian just their beliefs comes to existential treat

He is atleast making ppl realise packaged food are not healthy..he promotes health and u are concerned abt oncogens and other stuff🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ those packaged foods arent good for us during long term period and is trying to cover necessary information in a yt short....ofc ppl like you try to bash him....u might have all the time in the world to sit and argue with some1 who does 1% better than rest of ppl who r sitting at home like you and bashing ppl like him who r trying to bring abt change🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

Just imagine if 1+1=5 not 2 . Truely says only god can make the universe. Man this is dumb

Thats why i never take seriously from science channels from India. I also thought you were pro muslim channel but after somevideos i realised you were legit. Indias maximum channels are either islamic or hindu

Nilesh Oak eh? Any relation to PN Oak, another clown?

4:15 Forrest Valkai sir probably would have had an heart attack reading that headline whilst knowing that it is taught in actual school. "Creation of living organism?

J Lie Deepak just imagined this from animation movie Coco.

😂😂 wow

For a few minutes, I actually thought you were faking an accent.

Oh so that's why Sai Deepak flies hot air balloons in his speeches. To carry the ancestral spirits upwards. There must be a lot of spirits lying down here.

Very nice 👍👍👍

She's not totally wrong may be her explanation is not to the point in current context but Sabarimala is a MokshaDham like Kailash Mansarovar Even men have to follow some strict rules before entering the temple although they don't thats there problem but mokshadham literally means which gives you moksha and for that you have to leave all kinds of worldly pleasures and Family and Some temples definitely have Higher Frequencies which somewhere affect human bodies.