Please subscribe to this channel for more updates!
Пікірлер: 15
@jaydutta4355 Жыл бұрын
One of great lecture videos by an imminent in the field of Quantum Physics.
@buckweasel59313 жыл бұрын
Good work buddy I'm actually from Germany but it was so well explained I understood it anyways😅
@akta1984 Жыл бұрын
Good explanation, exactly what I have been looking for. Thank you.
@Sanjayydv__12Ай бұрын
Thank you❤❤
@mahdichaypeyma13048 ай бұрын
Good explanation,Thank you.
@jonny4233 Жыл бұрын
This blows my mind - if you sent a single particle, the phase shift would control which detector the particle arrives at (unless I'm mistaken).
@PragyAgarwal10 ай бұрын
what is causing the assymetry in the measured intensities here? The setup seems perfectly symmetrical, except for the direction of the input light. Is that direction causing the difference in the measured intensities?
@beasea7617 ай бұрын
the phase plate causes a phase shift in one of the components
@Sanjayydv__12Ай бұрын
Thank you so much ❤❤
@nilakanthameher24063 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation...
@inventaunmanana48603 жыл бұрын
I believe there is constructive interference btw both beams in detector 2, probably the numbers should be interchanged? E.g. for sensor 2 of the video, there are 1 transmission + 2 reflections for each beam.
@yacc17062 ай бұрын
I think is a erratum. If phase shift is 0, all intensity will get detector 2, E1+E2. The detector captions are interchanged!
@jacobvandijk65253 жыл бұрын
@ 3:25 Very disappointing! He already discussed the beam-splitter and said nothing about it. @ 7:04 And again, there is only 1 input-port.
@QuantumPolyhedron7 ай бұрын
There are actually 2 input ports... the moment you realize that you realize that there is no need to say the single photon that passes in spreads out into a wave taking both paths that collapses at the end, there is no need to then draw any of the conclusions people draw from interferometer based thought experiments: interaction free measurements, retrocausality, the "cheshire" effect, etc. It is all based on the assumption that there is only one input when there is two!
@jacobvandijk65257 ай бұрын
@@QuantumPolyhedron Thanks. It would have been better to understand if he had mentioned what you have written above.