Quine's Logistical Approach to Ontology

[@okzoia]

Daniel: I wrote my dissertation on Quine's naturalized epistemology and I am familiar with most of his work, and I have to say that your account of his philosophy is the best I have seen, especially for undergraduates. I can tell that you not only know your stuff, but that you love what you are doing, and the students are really engaged. I wish my lectures on Quine were as accurate, entertaining and clear as yours are. Keep it up! Rick

[@annieandre4893]

You are an absolute angel. Thank you so much for helping me to understand! Whoever is marking my essay will undoubtedly thank you aswell

[@Wingedmagician]

This channel is a gift. I’d download this whole thing just in case.

[@jrrr5039]

Jokes are on fire in this! Brilliant lecturer for sure.

[@KayBeeJay]

Thanks for putting this up. Great professor

[@die_schlechtere_Milch]

thank you for uploading these lectures!

[@Sapiensis901]

Please, sorry turn on the subtitle

[@humeanrgmnt7367]

for some x that exists (pebbles) X have roundness.

[@inggriddev]

Info subtitle

[@safiraaprilialuckyta8691]

ga tau mbak e, kulo nggeh mumet sirah e

[@websurfer352]

What minimum factors are essential for something to exist?? Would be substance and accidents for instance?? A clock has accidents it’s physical properties what it looks like and sounds like?? But what it is, it’s being a clock is independent of its accidents?? There are square clocks!! So, being a clock is it’s substance!! But, a pure substance devoid of accidents would be a pure spirit?? A non-physical entity has no accidents or physical properties?? And pure accidents without a substance might be possible if substance is actually an idea?? If substance was ultimately a phenomenological label we place on things?? Like a clock is a clock because we use clocks to tell time?? On the other hand if substance is actually the what a thing is regardless of what we deem it to be?? In that case it would be impossible for accidents to exist without a substance!!

[@darrellee8194]

The question is science is can I measure it? Science advances by developing new and better ways of measuring. How do we measure roundness?