"QURAN IS NOT PRESERVED" [DEBUNKED BY SHAYKH AL KHAMIS]

[@xenomorphisisdilage472]

Subhan’Allah, may Allah preserve the Shaykh. Just listening to him is a treat.

[@tofutofu137]

Jazaka Alaahou Khairan Sheikh for this beautiful explanation. Baaraka Alaahou feekoum one dawah for this brilliant refutation.

[@sevenheavens6313]

May Allah increase you in beneficial knowledge and give you Guidance and blessings

[@one_dawah]

Wa iyaak 🙏

[@tofutofu137]

MashaAlaah, an excellent series one dawah. May Allah bless you and reward you with janaat al firdous al a'alaa.

[@burnttomato3577]

Ma shaa Allah, May Allah bless you and this Shiekh. Ameen

[@mewzi]

Loving these series

[@goshbaby8531]

this clears up alot for me, JazakAllah hu khairan!

[@ISLAMICDEFENSE9302]

ALLAH hu akbar

[@zhasan6561]

Salam bro

[@mujahid5470]

Jazakallah, bro

[@محمد-ر6غ4ذ]

Tabarakallah, great and clear explanation.

[@rokayamane2668]

Always remind David that he almost killed his dad with the hammer 🔨🛠. David the hammer man.

[@joenathan7211]

Jazakallahu khairan

[@4funclps]

jazkallahukhayr

[@HayatHayat-rj8sg]

Mashallah sheikh Uthman Allah yahfazak

[@balochiduroos]

Is it halal to edit his face like that?

[@yasirm3215]

David mocked Allah ﷻ and Rasulullah ﷺ so there's nothing wrong with the edit.

[@rokayamane2668]

@@yasirm3215 👏🙌

[@balochiduroos]

@@yasirm3215 You sure? I mean I'm no faqeeh that's why I asked. If you're wrong then. It's pretty dangerous... It was narrated that 'Abdullah said: "The Messenger of Allah [SAW] said: 'Among the people who will be most severely punished on the Day of Resurrection will be the image-makers.'" Nasa'i 5364

[@balochiduroos]

@Muhammad Abdullah جزاك الله خيرا

[@Fox2025-v2n]

No it’s not allowed it’s haram

[@nobodynobody4389]

None of what is said in the video refutes points made by David on the contrary it reinforces them and shows that's uthman has committed shirk by choosing which were the words of Allah out of all differing (thus not preseved miraculously) circulating recitations and books

[@Ayo550]

do you even know the differences? they differed in recitation and pronounciation as said in Sahih Bukhari 4987. there was no difference in meaning. Uthman RA only wished to preserve the original ways of recitation as in the 7 Ahraf.

[@nobodynobody4389]

@@Ayo550 no they differed in meaning of words besides why not 11 Ahraf uthman took it upon himself to decide which ones were the words of Allah and thus seeked partnership with him similarly to Muhammad who first claimed that shirk is the worst all the while he constantly seeked partnership with him

[@Ayo550]

@@nobodynobody4389 there are 7 Ahraf not 11, at least learn the basics. secondly he didn't decide by himself. there was a book called the Mushaf of Hafsa which was the first compilation of the Quran, he just copied and standardised it.

[@nobodynobody4389]

@@Ayo550 there were 11 at least at one point in Islamic history it's you who should do some reading besides it wasn't only stadariaation it was a choice from entirely different Quran's with different words and sentences hardly a standardisation David made a good point in his video and this isn't a sufficient answer for it

[@Ayo550]

@@nobodynobody4389 show me where there were 11 Ahraf. Plus, the difference in words and sentence structure isn't anything new, it's something anybody with an actual understanding of Arabic would know. The meaning is overall the same other than the occasional depth of meaning which is literary effect and cannot directly be expressed in translation.

[@ABMRefutes]

You are refuting that idiot?. Masha Allah, me too. 🙂

[@artemis1127]

Salam alaykom, can you refute the latest vid of apostate prophet. He really thinks he got something😣

[@flyhigh2044]

يا شيخ هذه روايات عن قرات سبعة ليس صحيح. هناك فقط واحد رواية الذي نزل فيه القرءان وهو كما قال تعالى " فَإِنَّمَا يَسَّرْنَٰهُ بِلِسَانِكَ لِتُبَشِّرَ بِهِ ٱلْمُتَّقِينَ وَتُنذِرَ بِهِۦ قَوْمًا لُّدًّا" وقال "فَإِنَّمَا يَسَّرْنَاهُ بِلِسَانِكَ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَتَذَكَّرُونَ"

[@bilalbutt8574]

Are u a quranist?

[@adamnasser2995]

Why did Ibn Mas'ud and Ubay ibn Ka'b sometimes omit words like qul ("Say" ) in 112:1 and "him who created" before the words male and female in 92:3 (or why were both versions revealed)? Also I was wondering why Ibn Mas'ud and several others had "fast for three successive days" instead of "fast for three days" in 58:9 (or why was not just their version revealed)?

[@doug5434]

How is this an answer....? Muhammad said to learn the Quran from ibn masud and ibn masud said not to trust the uthman copy. This is just muslims coping because your own Islamic sources contradict your religion. Aisha says in an authentic hadith "I fear your lord hastens in fulfilling all of your wishes and desires" which basically means " I think you're making this all up as you go along in order to get what you want." Oh and you know how the eternal law of God says that men can have up to four wives? Well it would hurt Muhammad's feelings if Ali took a second wife therefore Ali cant marry a second wife. Yep Muhammad feelings are above the law of God somehow lmao. Muhammads convenient seizure revelations that get him out of trouble somehow didnt save him before he ate poisoned food which killed him according to authentic hadiths. Come on guys this is obviously all made up. Not to mention the endless scientific mistakes such as the house fly hadith

Muhammad died years later after he got poisoned and he gave other revelations after that event. One of his companions dropped dead immediately but he didn't die. Just as SHAYKH AL KHAMIS said, the different interpretations people had collected had small recitation differences. All Uthman did was try his best to standardise the quran to please all recitations. When quran was written during the time of Muhammad, there were no dots and signs on top of letters in arabic so dispute was created when arabic started to write its letters with them. A single letter can have multiple sounds depending on that one sign. Quran has 0 scientific mistakes. Hadith on the other hand is not 100% authentic, since it is not the word of God. Hadith have been categorized as strong, weak etc etc.

[@dp_9290]

@ and neither u as well answer the critics of david, rather make some stupid claims

[@Jfry69]

@@dp_9290 he literally answerd it lmao btw this is just a 8 minute video u can go and watch some schoolers answer the same question btw david wood isn't the first one to say this

[@dp_9290]

@@Jfry69 and u aren't able to add one link which actually debunk it according to u

[@DARTH-R3VAN]

​@@dp_9290 Read "Variant Readings of the Qur'an: A Critical Study of their Historical and Linguistic Origins" by Ahmad Ali al Imam for an actual full explanation. This video is too short for this subject.