Mr. Siu and his expert team is possibly one of the best Macro economy analysts, specialized in the Asian Region.
@mrslcom Жыл бұрын
Many of his points can be academically challenged. But it’s certainly better than the past and current policy implemented in China. There is no right or wrong answer. Every course of action has its consequences, whether intentional or unintentional. He is politically on the right, while China is mixed bag. Neither is the best for the entire population at large.
@uebatjik4468 Жыл бұрын
His analysis has been emprical and coherent. Appreciate.
@mrslcom Жыл бұрын
@@uebatjik4468 Yes, but despite what he claimed, his sources were often chosen to meet his narratives. Some of which were not objective or fact-checked. His analysis are often controversial and they’re not unfounded. I do agree with his points of view, but sometimes his comments and opinions can only be taken as a token reflection of his own personal views and bias.
@mrslcom Жыл бұрын
@@Johnson22813 I say Mr. Siu is an excellent analyst, among many. And like everyone else, he makes lots of mistakes and misconceptions. He’s a commentator and therefore we are unable to hear the counterpoints to his analysis. A lot of issues are complex which he oversimplifies in order to give his opinion. No one can provide an accurate solution in a half-hour video. Not even for a genius like Mr. Siu.
你可以說當有通縮時 fiat money 的優點是政府可以隨意印錢救市,但不要忘記政府可隨時印鈔即可隨時合法地以通漲盜取人們的購買力。所謂救市其實是拿你的購買力去救,而且從來沒有徵得你同意。人們很容易看到通縮時經營困難,百業蕭條,但不大多人會想到對勤於儲蓄者,他們的購買力在這些時期是會不斷增加,中國人不是常說儲蓄是美德嗎?可能不太多人知到,歷史中所有的 fiat money 最後都是因通漲變成廢紙收場,平均壽命四五十左右,無一例外。
What he suggested will lead to a complete collapse of the Chinese financial system and the economy. It will take much longer than 2 years to recover. Not to mention foreign investments will pull out and be very cautious to return in the future, especially without radical change in political power and possibly the demise of the ruling CPP. It’s a good analysis and proposal but laced with a bit of wishful thinking and optimism.