R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister & Cherry and others v Adv.General for Scotland

  Рет қаралды 31,997

UKSupremeCourt

UKSupremeCourt

4 жыл бұрын

[2019] UKSC 41
UKSC 2019/0192
R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent)
On appeal from the QBD Administrative Court (England and Wales) (Leapfrog)
On 28 August 2019, on the advice of the Prime Minister, Her Majesty the Queen made an Order in Council providing that Parliament be prorogued on a day no earlier than 9 September 2019 and no later than 12 September 2019, until Monday 14 October 2019. The Prime Minister issued a press release stating that the purpose of the prorogation was to introduce a new legislative programme to Parliament at a Queen’s Speech to take place on 14 October 2019. Parliament was subsequently prorogued on 9 September 2019. The appellant issued proceedings for judicial review on the grounds that the Prime Minister’s decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was an abuse of power and beyond the proper constitutional limits of the common law prerogative of prorogation.
The issues are:
Whether the decision of the Prime Minister to advise Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament is justiciable in the courts; and
If the decision is justiciable and the appeal is not academic, whether that advice was lawful.
UKSC 2019/0193
Cherry and others (Respondents) v Advocate General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland)
On appeal from the Court of Session (Scotland)
The Inner House held that the issue of prorogation was, in the circumstances, justiciable. When the reasons for the prorogation that has occurred were considered they demonstrated that the true reason for the prorogation was to reduce the time for Parliamentary scrutiny of Brexit and thus prevent Parliament from performing its central role in scrutinising Government action.
The issue(s) are:
Whether the challenge to the decision of the Prime Minister to advise Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament is justiciable in the courts;
Whether the appeal is in any event academic, given Parliamentary sittings before the UK’s exit from the EU on 31 October 2019; and
If the appeal is justiciable, whether the Prime Minister’s advice was lawful.

Пікірлер
Miller (No 2), the Case of the Decade?: CULS Lecture
36:55
Cambridge Law Faculty
Рет қаралды 11 М.
The House of Commons Chamber
19:52
UK Parliament
Рет қаралды 731 М.
Nutella bro sis family Challenge 😋
00:31
Mr. Clabik
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
R v Jogee and Ruddock v The Queen
14:07
UKSupremeCourt
Рет қаралды 71 М.
Lady Hale, President of the UK Supreme Court - BBC HARDtalk
24:41
BBC HARDtalk
Рет қаралды 188 М.
How Big A Role Does Class Play In Modern Britain? (2011)
20:23
Journeyman Pictures
Рет қаралды 78 М.
The Judges: Power, Politics and the People - Episode 1 - Lord Woolf
37:29
The University of Law
Рет қаралды 3,6 М.
Isle of Wight Council (Appellant) v Platt (Respondent)
7:15
UKSupremeCourt
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Controversial Constitutional Cases: Miller I with Professor Mark Elliott
22:11
Cambridge Law Faculty
Рет қаралды 4,4 М.
The life and legal career of Baroness Hale
23:45
First 100 Years
Рет қаралды 34 М.