Can confirm it's awesome! Big ups to Jye and the ELRS team.
@McShakyFPV5 ай бұрын
I’ve been waiting for this! Next we need dual band moxon antennas for long range
@robertklug38632 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@ninjalemon_Squash5 ай бұрын
The price is quiet amazing. Good times ahead for the people who were trying to unknowingly bind a 2.4GHz receiver with a 900MHz all this time.
@Chillin-fpv5 ай бұрын
😂🤣
@maeluis62145 ай бұрын
Welcome to a new generation of pilots that don't need to understand about matching numbers to put a Fpv drone in the air 😂
@SkermiebroTech5 ай бұрын
Omg the amount of people who have messaged me about this
@CapnBry5 ай бұрын
Man what a great overview with plenty of details, great video Ian! I do not believe this will replace existing transmitters though because the LR1121 can't do FLRC at all, so F modes are completely out unless Semtech adds it to the chip. If they do, ExpressLRS webui now has a flasher for flashing the LR1121 firmware as well. You like firmware? We got like 19 firmwares per module now. Nobody can beat us on number of firmwares!
@lasersbee5 ай бұрын
The best Review and explanation of the Gemini and Gemini X systems that I have seen to date.
@m3chanist5 ай бұрын
A brilliant elaboration on gemini/ELRS , very clear and thorough. Cheers.
@smithe685 ай бұрын
Fantastic level of detail on this new system! The first thing I’d want to do is replace all those short rx antennas with longer ones so they could actually be outside the body of a wing.
@techstuff68295 ай бұрын
If the wing is foam or balsa or fiberglass they don’t really need to be outside the body.
@smithe685 ай бұрын
@@techstuff6829 I thought that might be the case but I wasn’t sure, thanks for confirming that. I do like them further apart though.
@fokusfpv5 ай бұрын
it seems like this could be great for pro work - run one band on 2.4 and the other on 900 and you get the benefits of short and long range RX/TX combo (as long as the quad is running the new RX - which looks great as well!)
@Chillin-fpv5 ай бұрын
Now it makes sense why radiomaster never released their version of gemini.
@fokusfpv5 ай бұрын
thinking the same thing :)
@CRO-dr4si4 ай бұрын
Agree.
@billmcdonald43355 ай бұрын
US$75 for both TX _and_ RX. Killer deal. Gotta love open source!
@gammagonad16575 ай бұрын
So smart making one module that will fit JR and Nano.
@dave8825 ай бұрын
Awesome. Now to figure out where to run four antennas 😂
@podex6354Ай бұрын
On a quad: maybe one on every arm Fixed wing: just stuff it somewhere 😂
@northerntierfpv89475 ай бұрын
Thanks Ian, I know how Dual Band works now. Always good stuff! Cheers
@JPMediaProductions5 ай бұрын
Wow! This is impressive. Going to have to get one now. Now I gotta figure out where to those four antennas on the quad lol.
@kedrickperkins3315 ай бұрын
I would love for radiomaster to release this with the ability to replace the internal module of the boxer and tx26s
@SuprDlux5 ай бұрын
Game changing.
@Rafa-pt7oh5 ай бұрын
Buen trabajo,como siempre.
@redreefbud5 ай бұрын
Just like the betafpv true diversity i have been running for last year 😉😁 good stuff
@giusepearturo5 ай бұрын
This is perfect technology for large RC airplanes, both gasoline and turbine-powered, where maximum redundancy and safety are needed. Create PWM receivers, and you will gain a new, large market.
@VladTepes445 ай бұрын
There are crossfire to PWM converters around. Matek has several that are pretty cheap including one with a Vario and GPS connectivity
@giusepearturo5 ай бұрын
@@VladTepes44 yeah but si Sketchie for a big plane, i had tried those but i don see a guy put that in a 10k jet
@nvrmor023Ай бұрын
Just get frsky they have been doing this for years.
@406fpv95 ай бұрын
This is awesome! Might be a little difficult trying to fit a reciever that huge in a quad but still awesome!
@Chillin-fpv5 ай бұрын
It doesn't look any bigger than a 20x20vtx
@TheCra6er2 ай бұрын
5:07 I missed, why it is necessary to use vibration dampers?
@petrusoroaga65285 ай бұрын
44 bucks it's a steal. Glad to live these times :))))
@ugpfpv3615 ай бұрын
Crossfire, who 🤔... Wow I like and will keep my betafpv Gemini, but $45!!!! Awesome, radiomaster is killing it!!!
@AttentionDeficitHobbyDisorder5 ай бұрын
Very excited to see so much new stuff happening with ELRS! I wonder if it would be possible to install the internals of this unit as an internal module. I've been considering the Gemini internal upgrade for my T20 V2, but if this could be installed with that same kit, that would be amazing!
@_google_user_3 ай бұрын
It's out now, in the mail from Radiomaster.
@jerryFPV5 ай бұрын
Final nail in the coffin for TBS crossfire?😂
@jameswho55175 ай бұрын
Super interesting, now if only we got more BW :P Thanks for the info!
@dennisvandervloet86405 ай бұрын
Amazing but so difficult at the same time 😅 I am allready glad my crossfire is working as it should 😂
@VideoAve5 ай бұрын
Thank you very much! I’m interested in getting the transmitter but I just want to be sure it will work ok with my existing old 2.4 GHz ELRS receiver.
@techstuff68295 ай бұрын
Yes, it will, but only when using the LoRa modulation not FLRC.
@speed2o75 ай бұрын
Why do I want this? It’s beyond overkill for what I do. 😂
@JDsRCModelWorld-up7ws5 ай бұрын
Great for aircraft...Drones maybe 7 to 10 inch!
@Chillin-fpv5 ай бұрын
I use the betafpv gemini module in my boxer with the radiomaster RP4TD receiver in my 5 inch quads. The LQ doesn't move below 99 I barely look at my rssi dbm and LQ anymore cuz that's how locked in it is. I really only look at my MBPS for my video feed cuz that's my ONLY limiting factor on far I can fly. Well, that and battery power. Gemini is absolutely incredible! Gemini x 🤯 hopefully it's 5 times better than gemini
@ThorrFPV5 ай бұрын
Hi Mad, love your videos! I am going to be trying to repair some drone parts. I don't really know how. Would you maybe be able to do a video on basic repair technics? Not really diagnosing, but what stuf to use and how to use it correctly.
@UAVfutures5 ай бұрын
heck yeah, awesome video and tear down brother.
@Peter-z1h4 ай бұрын
There is compatibility issue with the nano adapter. Does not fit with normal nano module bay found in Frsky radios and TBS Tango 2 module bay addon.
@PeterBesenyeiАй бұрын
Could you please test Tandem and Twin FrsKy Transmitters, please on your Spektrum Analyser?
@maxsteal19825 ай бұрын
@MadRC what do think are the best receiver antennas for this receiver?
@TriMeX19872 күн бұрын
So what does the antenna mode do for this module ? Gemini I get but then antenna 1 and antenna 2 since they are both dual band I am guesing not alot ? and the last mode switch? Also I can confirm you need a 3d print for putting on a tango 2 and externa lipo power 6v -16.8v to run it. ( something you might want to know a head )
@drelephanttube5 ай бұрын
Hi Mads, love your videos. Can you please test latency on the janky new Walksnail Goggles X analog thingy?
@skiseb046 күн бұрын
Is there any dual band long range antenna on the market for the TX ? The stock ones seems to be kind of limited for long range in X100 or X150 packet rate.
@stevearmett15652 ай бұрын
Awesome overview ! I am brand new to Express ELRS and I have got this Nomad Gemini module for my TX 16S. I fly fixed wing and this allows redundancy and the Radio master ELRS RX's are literally half the price of mainstream RX's really impressed so far !!
@sashgorokhov5 ай бұрын
No screen and no RGB leds 😢
@Bulu28985 ай бұрын
If my cake is in front of me believe I'm the only eating it. Hahaha awesome review 👏 😄.
@chriswhitehead60954 ай бұрын
TBS was about to release a similar product in 2045, maybe! I am a Crossfire user.
@SFPFPV5 ай бұрын
So can we use the Nomad in dual 915mhz mode with a standard true D 915mhz rx and have 915mhz Gemini? 915mhz Gemini 100Full seems like the holy grail of LR ELRS.
@techstuff68295 ай бұрын
Yes.
@mtv14bvlos4 ай бұрын
How does it compare for range capability to Doodle Labs Mesh Rider dual band which claims 80+ kilometers
@SebastienChedalBornu5 ай бұрын
how dual band antenna (with one RP-SMA connector) can be good on both band ? thrilled byu the product but this question keeps in my mind
@cnw-jd9tt4 ай бұрын
can you do a vid on what hz is best for what you do? such as 250 vs 333 full because thats something i still struggle to understand, i know that 500 is faster then 250 but what does d and full mean?
@captain-22Ай бұрын
What if one chip sends alternate packets of 2.4 and sub900 , that way zero latency untill u loose one, and even then u still remain in control but in limp mode, should be a great feature for single chip rx/tx sets,
@chrislappas1Ай бұрын
Hey Ian!! Can we fly this module in Europe???
@garycaruso48835 ай бұрын
So Please!.. a dual band integrated Boxer Color screen next year?
@TheCatFather015 ай бұрын
Amazing
@MorningView5 ай бұрын
rofl i just bought bandit nano module (on you recommendation!)
@amgbenz7712 күн бұрын
Can you swap the antennas for the 2.4 915 T band?
@derrogers5 ай бұрын
i never switched from 900mhz to 2.4ghz, probably the best time to do so... no need to switch all rx on the old gear...
@stevietee105 ай бұрын
going to need a 20x20 blank board to stop the uFLS' popping off !
@MadRC5 ай бұрын
Possibly some glue.
@MatCron5 ай бұрын
you can also use bayckrc elrs very small same functions
@NaorFPV5 ай бұрын
maybe print with TPU
@jimmytheriot89785 ай бұрын
In x mode what antenna is 2.4 and what antenna is 900 if we wanted to replace antennas for better ones while on x mode
@BengalCatChilli5 ай бұрын
Sorry, what was that Spekrum? 😂😂😂
@SebastienChedalBornu3 ай бұрын
@Mads Tech you confirm that the DBR4 got always 2 antennas that are connected but not used am i right ?
@angelnunez6476Ай бұрын
It uses both at once unless you change it in radio settings on the tbs luascript
@mfrfpv90795 ай бұрын
Can we get a starter kit with 3 elrs Gemini recivers ❤❤❤❤?
@puneethff49275 ай бұрын
A great review brother thanks a lot , and a small question , like as it has 2 frequency bands and it can bind to both the individual receivers at once right ?? , so is it possible to use 2 receiver in a ardupilot , one to control quad and other one to get the telemetry data( like flashing the other receiver to airport we can use it as a telemetry receiver ) ? as i know we need 2 set of uart on the module to get this worked i think ?? like one to controll quad and another one to connect to laptop or mobile for telemetry data ? or am i wrong ? , like if this is possible then we will end of saving about a lot of money , like a quality telemetry module is from 60$ and it goes on ,, plz clarify me on this brother , it helps a lot
@CapnBry5 ай бұрын
Not at this time. Currently the same data is going on both connections and to a single dual band receiver.
@fordboyzzzz5 ай бұрын
that would be nice - long range telemetry. im guessing the 100mw telem does not go very far.
@puneethff49275 ай бұрын
@@fordboyzzzz yes brother Like I have seen people using elrs for telemetry data Like they will use one 2.4ghz module and rx to controller quad And another 900mhz module and rx to get the telemetry data And these both the receiver should be connected to different uart ports
@fordboyzzzz5 ай бұрын
@@puneethff4927 yea but im after long range - they only 100watt. could prob put another nomad module in the glider to get it back maybe.
@techstuff68295 ай бұрын
@@fordboyzzzz100mW telemetry goes surprisingly far actually, further than most will ever fly.
@NorgeSquad5 ай бұрын
Is it possible to hack it to 2W?
@Fazzelgaming2 ай бұрын
Does this one fit my taranis qx7?
@jimmytheriot89784 ай бұрын
Can this bind to crossfire nano,cant seem to get mine to bind
@rippfpv5 ай бұрын
But is it better than the 2w version?
@frank37225 ай бұрын
Can you better explain the 1800-1900 peak? It is only present when the module is broadcasting on 868/900MHz/ When you change to 2.4GHz, it is gone. I heard you blame a mobile carrier. Please explain. (around the 18:55 min mark)
@techstuff68295 ай бұрын
It’s a harmonic of the 900MHz signal, it’s there on the Bandit and TBS Crossfire TX modules as well, nothing to worry about.
@Vogxel4 ай бұрын
Is the 250 hz lowband compatable with older 900mhz rx?
@NeilKagan5 ай бұрын
Im excited to try it. But i do have a question. How would you set up X in betaflight ?
@Akceptor5 ай бұрын
Do you actually have to? AFAIK setup in betaflight normally looks like "okay, I have my receiver on UART 2" and that's it. Everything else is in the elrs configurator and lua scripts
@NeilKagan5 ай бұрын
@@Akceptor I always select a preset for the elrs configuration. Normally 250hz.
@Akceptor5 ай бұрын
@@NeilKagan I see. That preset usually just contains settings like if you have SPI or UART receiver, telemetry and RC smoothing. In this case you know it is UART, I don't know if you need RC Smoothing, but you can switch it on and off via toggle. I would probably disable smoothing for tests and just set select a proper port. The whole settings thing is in the different place anyways
@CapnBry5 ай бұрын
You don't do anything in betaflight other than using an appropriate Feed Forward setting for the packet rate-- betaflight just sees channels data coming like it normally does in a single band setup.
@NeilKagan5 ай бұрын
@@Akceptor gotcha. Thanks
@brianmar88505 ай бұрын
Would it be better to get this one instead of the radio Master Ranger Micro? Is this one still compatible with all the other ELRS receivers?
@techstuff68295 ай бұрын
Sort of. Main downsides are it’s slightly more expensive and somewhat larger. You also lose some modes when used with single-frequency 2.4GHz receivers.
@pav2k5 ай бұрын
Is the module compatible with my old 2.4 receivers on D500? (one is FLRC another one FSK..?)
@cinemoriahFPV27 күн бұрын
Take my money 💰
@sUASNews5 ай бұрын
So with this we can send MAVLINK as well? Just started watching this.
@jackvine1348Ай бұрын
On their website they say it is Mavlink ready so I assume so
@LobstersLobsters4 ай бұрын
Sweet now I can outrange my video link by dozens more kms :D
@jas-FPV5 ай бұрын
PleSe ask RM if nano will be fitting x20 radio
@fordboyzzzz5 ай бұрын
just ordered them, what is the best receiver antennas to get for a large glider long range?
@Michelsen3K5 ай бұрын
Lumenier ax2 long range or truerc singularity for example
@fordboyzzzz4 ай бұрын
@@Michelsen3K I just looked the ax2 up the day 5.8ghz - is that compatible with 2.4elrs receiver antenna’s?
@DizzyBoyTony4 ай бұрын
Im getting into FPV just now , I just purchased the TX16s and this module , does anyone know if I need a specific frame that mounts that receiver? Sorry if this is a dumb question .
@angelnunez6476Ай бұрын
Just put it above fc and extend top plate up if you have to.
@ДмитроНечай-с9о5 ай бұрын
But what does "F" modes mean in Elrs then?
@techstuff68295 ай бұрын
They use FSK modulation for the radio signal.
@ДмитроНечай-с9о5 ай бұрын
@@techstuff6829 And the practical impact of that?
@techstuff68294 ай бұрын
@@ДмитроНечай-с9о higher bandwidth, shorter range
@ДмитроНечай-с9о4 ай бұрын
@@techstuff6829 Thank you!
@breakflight5 ай бұрын
Looks interesting, but because of size, on a quad, I'd rather stay with an EP
@N0FPV5 ай бұрын
LoL I just bought a RM ranger module last week 😅
@Michelsen3K5 ай бұрын
Yeah me too. Nano ranger 😂 anyway. 915mhz not legal where i live. I don't want to get in trouble haha 😂
@quadswithmods5 ай бұрын
🎉
@Jay-zc7iq5 ай бұрын
If you had to choose, crossfire or this ……? Help
@valiant3604205 ай бұрын
All those words, and I still am not sure if it will bind to my existing 915 MHz express LRS receivers. 😏
@techstuff68295 ай бұрын
It will.
@emafpv5 ай бұрын
😊
@BrainDeadEngineering5 ай бұрын
My brain is still healing from the first Gen ELRS drama, not this ! the brain will be cooked for sure now🤣
@QuinDominicPLim4 ай бұрын
These might out perform vtxs.
@rcaddict95585 ай бұрын
How much do we really need, come on! Isnt normal true diversity enough, lets learn to fly well first! Thanks, this hobby is just draining money now and leaves us wanting every month! ❤
@fpvfun9224 ай бұрын
Overkill.... 😂
@jaysonrees7385 ай бұрын
I swear Radiomaster is in a constant state of "Hold my beer." One company will do something, and then a few months later, Radiomaster comes along with something that invalidates it.
@jasukenneth5 ай бұрын
So it happened. ELRS is now better than Crossfire.
@JPspinFPV5 ай бұрын
Been expecting this kit. At the price its a bargain.
@FürstKöterich5 ай бұрын
Vtx is the Problem mit the Radio
@Tokyo_Dom5 ай бұрын
And I thought managing 2 amtennas was annoying on a quad. Impressive tech indeed, but this doesn't seem really useful for anyone into micros.
@chuckjoga11615 ай бұрын
I really appreciate the content that you are producing. This is indeed impressive technology and makes me want to move away from Crossfire. However, your opinion on FPV companies producing equipment for war efforts does not seem to extend to the unspoken reason why all the redundancy with Deja vu, gemini, frequency hopping, etc are being developed. These technologies are hardly necessary for your average FPV pilot as I regularly fly miles on the least expensive Crossfire Nano/Tango 2 (1W) combo. But, if I were to be piloting my aircraft in a hostile war environment, this is the RC technology I would be running. It would be interesting to hear your opinion on how war efforts are driving development ad manufacturing of FPV equipment. e.g. 30x30 FC stacks seem to be cheaper than ever........
@kkazakov5 ай бұрын
LoL, wth. I don't fly in hostile environment, but with 250mW my connection sometimes drops. I definitely will be getting this module. Not for war.
@angelnunez6476Ай бұрын
Lower packet rate to increase range
@madladdan5 ай бұрын
Check that xt30 lol
@lonelyroamer5 ай бұрын
How to get 868mhz version? If I buy LBT version, it’s underpowered right?
@ChrisQuadFPV5 ай бұрын
They gave everyone on KZbin one Free. If you post a video on it 🎉
@MadRC5 ай бұрын
I know right!, I can't believe all I had to do was spend 2+ days testing, recording and editing to get this $45 module. These people will say anything to get free gear.
@ChrisQuadFPV5 ай бұрын
@@MadRC I'd be grateful
@josefdahari5 ай бұрын
Maybe they want everybody to keep it a secret and not explain exactly what it is. That's what they're doing their job explaining exactly what this product is. How dare they
@ChrisQuadFPV5 ай бұрын
@@josefdahari weird
@woltervandenberg5 ай бұрын
Frsky already implemented this three years ago with their Tandem and later the Twin protocol. I don't think it's a coincidence it's called Gemini when FrSky's counterpart is called Twin. I believe the ELRS team stole this idea from Frsky when they got the TWIN-module in their hands for the implementation of ELRS.
@rubberonasphalt5 ай бұрын
ExpressLRS is an open source team, who basically work for free to develop it. Radiomaster is the company selling these modules and receivers, using ExpressLRS. So ExpressLRS must be horrible thieves for stealing something they are not profiting from themselves You also can't steal the idea of redundancy, which has been a concept of radio for decades
@Vitroid5 ай бұрын
🤡
@Vitroid5 ай бұрын
Hopefully just a bad joke... Need an /s or /j in there mate
@WezleyVarty5 ай бұрын
Imagine accusing people of shady behaviour while also supporting a company like FrSky in the same breath 😂😂
@BengalCatChilli5 ай бұрын
Are you high?
@surjitsinghdeo65335 ай бұрын
So this + OpenIPC mario vtx + fixed wing, would be great for a long range setup ❤
@hradynarski5 ай бұрын
Oo common, dual band :) Ukrainians already have tipple band radios.
@MadRC5 ай бұрын
I hear the CIA has octotupa band radios. Either way this has NOTHING to do with this video bro
@hradynarski5 ай бұрын
@@MadRC It is related, those companies are looking for advancements and are just coping them in their products. And I'm not talking mill grade staff (CIA or DOD).