Rafale Jet Fighter - breakdown of the new Indian purchase - (Long Format)

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Support me on Subscribestar www.subscribestar.com/millennium-7-history-technology Support me on Patreon www.patreon.com/Millennium7

[@man15h]

Would you be comfortable to share the name of music which you have used @2:52

[@stupidburp]

Could you please consider making a video about the Chengdu J-10? It seems like it would make a nice addition to your delta wing fighter series. As the most numerous fighter currently in the People's Liberation Army Air Force it also seems relevant to current events.

[@man15h]

(I know have already asked this,but assuming you didn't receive it ,) pls share the 🎶 @2:52, and yes I agree Rafael is one of the best 4.5++ gen fighter jet but I think the radio used at the nose portion could have been better considering its 2020

[@man15h]

Oh sorry i thought you said 40 km but I turned the subtitles on

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

@@man15h It is a track called "Aphrodite" from Filmstro.com

[@r.blakehole932]

One thing I have to give the French credit for is maintaining an independent aerospace and defense capability despite the...challenges.

[@aymericdelansalut2760]

It’s paramount to us !

[@samarkand1585]

it's not fully independant however

[@liammarra4003]

Of course. After the fremch government losing their nation-state on mamy occasions. It would behoove them to ensure such independence. Theyre lucky they were on the wests side and were strong to be so independent, or else they probably would've been slapped doiwn, embargoed, sanctioned to death, and hell, throw in a US-UK backed coup for good measure.

[@fjordsiekl1492]

@@liammarra4003 Can you give examples when they lost their nation-state other than WW2?

[@stevendouglas3860]

France is already occupied by a 5th colonm

[@tangodman]

This is hands down the best and most detailed explanation on Rafale present on any media platform. Your knowledge on this subject is exceptional. Glad I found this channel.

[@Enuogyan]

Ok so now step 1 : spell Rafale properly 😁

[@tangodman]

Thanks for finding the mistake. Autocorrect error.

[@morso1]

Aerospace engineer here....agree, great quality content

[@NATObait]

@@morso1 If not factually correct. Rafale has not got similar performance to EFT Rafale engines rated; Dry 50kN ,Wet 75kN. Top Speed Mach 1.8 EFT engines rated. Dry 60kN. Wet 90kN. Top Speed Mach 2+ In war setting the EJ2000 give 69kN dry. German Airforce give Mach 2.35 as the top speed of its EF. EFT can Supercruise at Mach 1.5 with weapons Rafale can Supercruise at Mach 1.4 Clean. Looking at basics like Ferry Range Rafale with 3 X tanks 3760k EFT with 3 X tanks. 3700k When conformal tanks are fitted it would be greater for Rafale but EF has experimental not production tanks so it is hard to compare as we don't know what extra volumes they offer. The height capabilities of EFT are 19,812m The Rafale height capabilities are 15,835m The possibility of launching a missile from high speed and height give Meteor a 30% increase in range. So this is not a very good comparison video for the facts that are known are airbrushed .... simply the Rafale does not have similar performance.

[@docteurpimousse2117]

Thank you for showing respect to the French baguette. We'll always fight for it.

[@doogleticker5183]

Its origins are not French. But who cares? Fresh (warm) French baguettes are so awesome. Perfect with butter and ham slices...

[@jean-loupdesbordes4833]

@@doogleticker5183 Well in fact if the form isn't originally french it is not the case of the recipe of the past and I am sorry but both are necessary to make it french. And as french I live the invention of the french fries to the belgians who really do know how to make them.

[@Taketimeout3]

@@jean-loupdesbordes4833 Met or Zonder?

[@pritidodhia5059]

Hello sir, I am amazed with the knowledge you possess on these subjects. I have watched many of your videos before: EXTRAORDINARY!!!!

[@atacorion]

I worked extensively alongside French Rafales in Africa. Its an amazing Aircraft with fantastic ground crews and pilots. Their mission success rate was very high and its a very mature airframe with a lot of capabilities.

[@53r4x3h]

Are there any anecdotes you'd be willing to share without breaking OPSEC?

[@atacorion]

@@53r4x3h lotta dead jihadis in Nigeria and Chad/Mali

[@NATObait]

In the Libyan conflict Gripens provided recognisance flights and didn't get targeted due to their on board abilities. When the airfield they operated from was closed by an accident they flew from the taxiway.....very impressive, just perfect for Ukraine!

[@M1984FA]

@@NATObait You mean when the US war machine destroyed the wealthiest and most functional country in Africa AFTER Gaddafi gave up his nuclear ambitions? Now look at the place... slave markets and Al Quaeda flags. Something to be proud of.... not

[@didierchaumet]

The intelligent description of the Libya mission is very compelling, and demonstrates the plane is extremely cost effective when all associated mission costs are factored in.

[@paulmakinson1965]

For those interested in the Rafale, I recommend the channel of "Até", a retired French navy pilot who flew the Rafale M.

[@rasputin4u1]

This is a most enlightening video on the capabilities of the Rafale..so far no one had treated this topic with as much depth and indepth knowledge .

[@jetaddicted]

Complete and accurate. There are a few channels that provide quality content, this one is possibly the best of them, at least in my opinion, such luxury in details! Bravo.

[@gumnaamaadmi007]

A lot of Indians do not know this - the French have NEVER delayed the delivery of, or asked more money for(after the initial contract has been signed) any aircraft they delivered to the IAF. Unlike the Russians who keep upping the price and making us pay more and more even after a contract has been signed, the French have ALWAYS followed through on time and within budget. Remember how the cost of the INS VIkramaditya ballooned from an initial $700M to $2.5B? Or how they asked for a fortune to integrate the Brahmos to the Su-30s? Or how the Mig-29Ks have to make a trip to the hangar after every sortie due to reliability issues? Russian equipment is proving troublesome. Previous Indian governments were admittedly foolish when Dassault time and again offered to shift the M2000's assembly line here, and offered us the first -5's and -9s that the line produced. I sincerely believe that India should agree to host a future Rafale production line(if offered) and join the Franco-German-Spanish 6th gen fighter project while keeping the AMCA alive.

[@christophechaumont2735]

Agreed

[@NATObait]

Belgium have been refused a membership to the FCAS project and India would be given the same "you can look but not touch" answer should they ask. France never promised to build Rafale in India by setting up and certifying a production line, it was just Indian Paper Talk. As for France sticking to its cost price.......$255m dollars per unit gave a significant margin!

[@willisfernandes2366]

As an indian I agree with each and everything that you've mentioned.

[@nicolaspeigne1429]

When i saw the baguette, i couldn't help it but stand up and salute.

[@koaalor]

En chantant la marseillaise :-)

[@celestialboy]

Took me 3yrs to find such a channel to end my curiosity 😁🙃

[@arthurvandeman]

yes, where has this channel been? nothing like it on utube.

[@bob_leponge2277]

Great video and content. Nice to see France still has a few strong points in its industry and engineering. It's probably worth mentioning that the French (since De Gaulle) try to maintain they sovereignty and independence when it comes to strategic industries such as defense or energy. This is one of the big competing of the last few governments which have taken damaging steps against French capability to remain truly independent militarily. Nevertheless, the Rafale if an incredible machine and a thing of beauty, but to be fair Dassault have done it before. The various Mirage variants are incredible machines not totally obsolete today, and in my eye the most amazing looking fighter.

[@kolerick]

when you're so early nobody spelled it rafael yet...

[@thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361]

rafael is comming

[@everlearner8974]

Some dumb politician in India tried to make the Rafale deal a controversy by invoking corruption but he utterly failed. He also involved Former president Francois Hollande and his girlfriend's names as well. Since he is dumb, he always pronounced the Fighter as Rafael jet, which the Indian media also pounced upon without any regard for cross-verification. It's pathetic but it is what it is. That's why most Indian people who just follow news don't know its original pronounciation. Actually, the Israeli company, Rafael should sue this Indian politician :)

[@vinjagvijya]

@@everlearner8974 @Frenchpie he is an i-talian decent so you see he is dumb - 1/10 indian 3/4 italian and remains may be a slough dna. Who wanted to purchase these f-2 version which was just for eye wash - it's like a 2002 model with a outdated interrioirs and avionics. And fool the nation to showcase it's the lates F-3 c

[@spartanx9293]

@Frenchpie could be because it's a theoporic name

[@vinjagvijya]

@Frenchpie 🙂 got that sound and clear - the remaining 36 they want to build in india it self like the Russian multirole one. Not sure will it be manufactured here or assembled here. Need to wait and watch but good info on what has improved and what stays as is

[@arghya1611]

One word for the Rafale: Elegance. Much like the French. Bring on the croissants!

[@jamesmani5985]

Sir Ji💪🚀 ♥️🏋️ Real Meaning of Rafal is power ful One of Angel of God Fight against Evils 😍

[@vinjagvijya]

You making me feel hungry and given me a travel idea

[@max2008abhi]

@@jamesmani5985 that's Raphael, not rafale. Rafale is French and Raphael is Hebrew.

[@jamesmani5985]

@@max2008abhi okay 👍

[@kloschuessel773]

Well, looks like an f16 with two engines and take ins and a delta wing

[@ericksubverter8696]

_" Expensive Maybe but Really EXCELLENT!!! " , this looks Like European Chef Presenting BEST Dish in his Restaurant_ _Much love and Respect from India !_

[@Snp2024]

Especially french dish minus frog legs

[@ericksubverter8696]

@@Snp2024 lol Yeah right 👍😁

[@VuLamDang]

Lol most french things in a nutshell

[@Fabio-om4kb]

Non pas expensive, proportionnelle a ces capacités. Sera jamais aussi chère qu'un F35 sur toute sa durée de vie.

[@drunkcat1713]

🤣🤣🤣

[@off_grid_javelin]

One of the biggest plus points of purchasing rafale for IAF was the fact that Eurofighter was joint venture and bad ties with any of the participants (UK, our former coloniser for e.g.) nations in future could create lack of cooperation to maintain eurofighter fleet. While rafale also has some components from other nations but they are replaced by french seeing that India and other future customers would highly prefer it, Although Indian indigenous tejas mk2 will be more than sufficient for IAF's need in future but the French has always came to our rescue as they're the most autonomous nation that is a part of nato.

[@NATObait]

Don't buy FCAS that is a joint effort 🇧🇪🇪🇸🇫🇷 stick to Tejas and it's 🇺🇲 engines etc.

[@off_grid_javelin]

@@NATObait well we won't, our plans differ as far as 5th and 6th gen fighters are concerned, read about AMCA, it's wind tunnel model is already finished since half a year ago and 1st flight will be before 2025. The American engines are an emergency substitute until an indigenous one is developed with French assistance.

[@davidsuzukiispolpot]

That was great. I didn't know France made such a good plane, and the sensors and sensor fusion looks very good.

[@betterworld6166]

Very informative video , very clear explanation. This is also the first video of yours which i was able to understand fully. i have tried many others videos as well.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Glad it was helpful!

[@hangie65]

Excellent series of videos reviewing the Rafale in all its version. Many thanks for posting!

[@andrewlambert7246]

The good thing with French is that they during combat exercises dont put on their radars and try not to show the capabilities of their weapons even to their allies. They usually only sniff around at exercisers and try to snap up electronic emissions of other nations radars. The Indians are also very careful about their radars.

[@noobda4932]

Are you usaf pilot ? Do you do exercises with other nations??

[@yumyum7309]

Greetings from France! Great video, nice to see you again!

[@JDSFLA]

Rafale is the new jet fighter acquired BY India....from France. Thanks for the video from which I learned a lot about this plane.

[@jamesmani5985]

Yes and Customized To IAF Further Fighters will be Assembled. made in India 50/50💪🚀

[@Taketimeout3]

You forgot to mention the stowage holes for baguettes in the cockpit. This, of course, is the most important upgrade that explains its ability to operate missions exceeding 12 hours duration.

[@williamtell1477]

One of the best channels on KZbin!!

[@Robert_Kawalec]

Correct !!

[@abrahkadabra9501]

Just subscribed and really enjoying the content. 👍 This is probably the only combat aviation channel on KZbin that actually presents factual quality information and refrains from tribal chest thumping. You should have 10 X the subscribers you have now!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Welcome aboard!

[@neoasj]

Good work bro, from India. 🇮🇳🇨🇵🇮🇳🇨🇵🇮🇳🇨🇵🇮🇳🇨🇵🇮🇳🇨🇵

[@manassurya2019]

India already paid all the initial costs for the rafale in the first batch, such as weapons, training costs, simulators, infrastructure modification, spare parts, India specific modifications, etc. That's why the initial 36 rafales cost 8.4 billion USD. If India decides to buy 36 more, the next batch will cost only about 4 billion USD. India will most probably order 36 more, for a total of 72 rafales.

[@viharamonastry]

@Marcos B Indian centric r&d cost 1.8 bil $ Training/infrastructure cost another 1 bill So next 36 will come for 5 bill $

[@mrspaceman2764]

I didn't know that part about the French in Libya. Pretty bad ass!

[@hectorherbert6585]

Dassault Aviation has integrated their combat systems in the late private jet FALCON where the pilots can fly only by visuals on a large screen in any weather with an all weather camera even by a foggy night on a blacked out runway ,very impressive..

[@inwedavid6919]

In a video from indian army they talk about the MICA and adapt it on the SU30, in this official video they explain that the Mica is a little superior to the AAMRAM and a lot to its Russian counterpart, making the SU30 a far more efficient plane with it.

[@anilbundhoo7486]

I salute you sir. Thank you for this excellent analysis. You definitely know what you are talking about. You have a new subscriber.

[@Snp2024]

I hope India buy 110 more of these .

[@dgap4724]

India will have a total of 72 of them, means 36 more on IAF wishlist as of now. The ADA and DRDO/HAL are really pushing for Tejas MK2 around 2025 and the AMCA around 2024. People have doubt over it, watching the track record of hal/iaf's everchanging wish of Tejas's capabilities/flowing of funds. And Tedbf too is on the list which will gonna replace carrier-based mig29ks around 2029.

[@dgap4724]

@ no, I think there is no future of mmrca 2.0. that's in the dustbin now if you see the way things are taking place. There will be very less chance that IN will opt for Rafale, even if it does..the number will certainly not be 90. I think there won't be any rafale in Navy. Both navy and the govt is focusing on TEDBF . mig29ks will start phasing itself out from 2033 and TEDBF first flight is scheduled for 2029. So govt is going in that path. TEFBf is also given green light so that the air force version of it ORCA can be developed quickly on the TEFBf structure. So, if you ask me, then another 36 rafale for IAF will end the saga of buying foreign fighters IF EVERYTHINGS STAYS ON THE RIGHT PATH. And 42 sqrdn cant be achieved before 2035-40

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

The Rafale needs at least a 70mts catapult to take off. The V. carrier doesn't have one. Maybe it could TO from the sky jump but I am pretty sure that the payload will be severely affected, up to the point of not being worth considering. Adding the catapult is a terribly complex job that heavily taxes the ship structure, either steam or EMALs. Unless India buys a new catobar, no Rafales for the Indian Navy.

[@dgap4724]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech Exactly. And chaps who are saying that Rafale for IN are not entirely wrong either. But things have changed in last 2-3 years and IN is seriously thinking to boost the Submarine fleet rather than diverting the fund to a new aircraft carrier, IN has 1 carrier right now i.e INs Vikramaditya and 1 will soon join the fleet in 2022 i.e INs Vikrant. but IN had a plan of constructing a CATOBAR type carrier. "INS Vishal, also known as Indigenous Aircraft Carrier 2 (IAC-2), is a planned aircraft carrier to be built by Cochin Shipyard Limited for the Indian Navy. It is intended to be the second aircraft carrier to be built in India after INS Vikrant (IAC-1). The proposed design of the second carrier class will be a new design, featuring significant changes from Vikrant, including an increase in displacement. An Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) CATOBAR system is also under consideration.[8] Its name Vishal means 'giant' in Sanskrit.[9]"-Wikipedia but as things are panning out, IN wants a large submarine fleet , than constructing a new carrier.

[@mangeshchalan8786]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech well we are developing orca for the carriers so I don't think we need rafel-m in airforce maybe we do

[@oclastax]

Very nice video man, you really deserv way more subscribers than what you have !

[@likklej8]

French built aircraft design is beautiful it’s like fine art in the air, really good looking airplanes.I loved the Caravelle airliner!

[@kloschuessel773]

This plane looks like the f16 just with two engines and the delta wing design And french planes used to be really fucking ugly

[@theric66]

@@kloschuessel773 it doesnt look like a f16 but a mirage 2000 first the f16 didnt have a delta wing ,no canards and only one engine and lots of things are different , the f16 is the plane created by the us but has no resenblance with the rafale the f35 is certainly an ugly plane

[@kloschuessel773]

@@theric66 all nonsense Especially saying the f35 is ugly Totally retarded statement Have yet to see an ugly stealth plane

[@kloschuessel773]

@@theric66 boeings version of that one engined stealth plane was indeed to thicc

[@theric66]

@@kloschuessel773 stealth plane doesnt mean nice the shape of the f35 is ugly and dont insult me for saying that, grow up and respect the fact that some people dont agree with you

[@FlamesOfThought]

such an excellent presentation video. Thank you, that was top draw. Off to Patreon now

[@thondupandrugtsang]

I'm thrilled that India choose the Rafale.

[@dranzergigs8333]

It was a logical choice. Russian planes are very outdated , American planes are very expensive and have humiliating user agreement clauses, gripen is not very impressive and the eurofighter has a very complex supply chain since it s an entire EU project. France has been a reliable supplier to India for decades so the trust factor was also there.

[@doogleticker5183]

@@dranzergigs8333 - How many have been bought? Nuff said.

[@dranzergigs8333]

@@doogleticker5183 36 at the moment. Although some unconfirmed reports say the air force is demanding 36 more.

[@doogleticker5183]

@@dranzergigs8333 - Then that is good news! Namaste.

[@prashanthb6521]

@@doogleticker5183 Indian Navy has started testing Rafale since yesterday.

[@aleksandarjevremovic1028]

Best, most informative, extremely well explained aviation Chanel available. Great job man. Its plesure to follow you. Greetings from Serbia.

[@darveshzamindar]

A good video 👍 after a long time.

[@neelscooldude1]

India should immediately order 72 more of these birds. They perfectly fit Indian needs

[@vinjagvijya]

It literally replaces 4 fighters 2 intercepter 2 bombers. That is the main reason it's called the omnirole combact aircraft

[@haseebahmed1320]

do you have 72 more abhinandan ?

[@neelscooldude1]

@@haseebahmed1320 Abhinandan takes a 1960 MiG. Chases F16 squadron into Pakistan territory and shoots down a 2007 model F16. Then Pak in its sheer terror closes its airspace for 45 days. Imagine if Abhinandan had a Rafale. Ur F16 pilot didn't even get a janaza. Now they won't even take off

[@pravinmeher2036]

@@haseebahmed1320 we have more abhinandans than the number of f-16's you have. Lol. Tumhare nikamme pilots ne f16 ki izzat ka faluda bana diya. Khairat me planes to mil gaye. Fly suar ki aulade karenge yo hashra to yahi hoga.

[@pravinmeher2036]

@@neelscooldude1 kargil me maranewaloko janaza haasil nahi hua. Unanki lashe le janeke liye bhi paisa nahi tha en bhikhariyoke pass.

[@arupdas4657]

Great Info. Now I know why India ordered Rafale to handle a two front war as it does not have dedicated SEAD capability unlike the US.

[@Pranith_]

Excellent.... really informative video...

[@bernardotorres2532]

I liked the slow paced way in which the host talked,, if it had been an American or an British host he would have talked noticeably faster, and slow paced talk is a good thing for a listener who is hearing matters that are rather different to what he/she is familiar with.

[@jenuvs4886]

Absolutely loved the detailed content and highly appreciate the quality of the content. I genuinely wish people showed a little more appreciation to such quality awesome videos, than the normal click bait ones.. Kudos guys.. Lots of love from India.

[@AFMR0420]

I hadn’t previously realized that the Rafale had such a high loiter time or super cruise capabilities.

[@NATObait]

Rafale can Supercruise at Mach 1.4 Clean EFT can Supercruise at Mach 1.5 with weapons F22 can Supercruise at Mach1.82 with weapons Impressive but even Gripen E claims it can Supercruise at Mach 1.2 with weapons and its top speed is Mach 2.

[@rajendrakumarshivalingarad724]

Very frank, bold , straightforward, neat analysis with proper inputs 😎

[@onesec8005]

Very thorough, detailed, and informative. Great work. Thank you.

[@XR190190]

I live in France and saw 2 Rafale training in the sky. Then suddenly the two of them had like a bubble popping around them ? Then 2 consecutive big BOOM, making my windows shake ! It was 2 days ago and the news said those 2 Rafale were training going past the wall of sound and that it was the cause of the big BOOM ! Such an incredible plane !

[@XR190190]

@Pavan Kumar They do in France, it's not that unusual

[@morso1]

Love the long Version breakdown

[@marc9080]

Vous êtes un vrai passionné et un connaisseur, c'est rare sur YTube! merci, cet avion est le meilleur dans sa catégorie voir plus mais la France communique d'une manière différente des autres pays! Dassault est un fabuleux constructeur d'avion de guerre! et il n'a rien a envier à personne pas même à LM! pour terminer j'apporte une modification nouvelle plus récente sur la capacité et la détection via le pod de Thales, le Damocles a été remplacé par le Thalios!

[@Robert_Kawalec]

As usually, Great piece of material. Really interesting. Please cover SAAB JA 37 Viggen in future videos. Keep it up.

[@KingKong-os7iv]

Great aircrafts. But by favourite is still the Mirage of the french ACs :)

[@harishkiran3663]

Can Brahmos be integrated with Rafael?!

[@neelscooldude1]

Pretty sure it is. But the customisation specifics are not made public. But just looking at the price that India has paid, its pretty obvious they asked for Brahmos mounting capability

[@mayankrajsinghchauha]

No because brahmos is of russian origin . Its nearly impossible ...We are buying Hammer missile though

[@depakranjanb6717]

@@mayankrajsinghchauha brahmos was jointly developed by India and Russia. So India definitely would like the option of arming rafale with brahmos.

[@Kal_sengupta]

@@mayankrajsinghchauha Too little of information to a underdeveloped brain is a very dangerous thing !!!

[@off_grid_javelin]

Although nato has been very "do gooding" kind of organization for middle east (lolz), but I don't think even F35s will be flying anywhere near eastern libyan airspace if S400s are ACTUALLY deployed there, Nato clearly does not wants to find that fight's outcome, as we saw with turkey too.

[@NATObait]

F35 and it's stand off weapons are designed for S400. We are not seeing great ability from S400 in Ukraine are we.

[@emmanuelcarre6796]

vous avez réussi à m'apprendre tellement de choses sur mon jet préféré ! Merci Monsieur !

[@परशुरामएकशिवभक्त]

People comparing Rafale with J20,but let me tell you this *_"A knight in shining armor is a man who has never had his metal truly tested."_* J20 hasn't been into any war or battle whereas Rafale is battle tested and actively participated in Libyan war and ongoing Syria & Iraq conflict...

[@bing3820]

Sure. Combat experience in war zones with practically no enemy air power is better than nothing I guess

[@prasmitkumarpradhan1497]

@@bing3820 😂😂😂 but Turkish army get bombed by this plane bcoz they didn't get it in radar

[@jkmcgregor7797]

Libya and Syria with no opposition in the air is not battle tested.

[@alainprostbis]

@@jkmcgregor7797 simply not true. ground-to-air-missiles-tested is battle-tested.

[@jkmcgregor7797]

@@alainprostbis no opposition fighters not tested

[@sufianansari4923]

26:35 hey a little of topic my good sir, but what is the tune in the background here? ps great video

[@KernowekTim]

Good on ya France. Yet another really very fine fighter aircraft.

[@celtoroma4013]

Greece has just fast tracked the acquisition of 18 Rafales. When facing an aggressive regime, there is diplomacy and there is Rafale diplomacy. I predict additional orders from India very soon. If your neighbours are cool and wealthy, buy Gripen. If not, and if America doesn't really care about you (like Greece or India), Rafale is a good option. If your sky is safe, do as the French, have a Baguette!

[@geekdaddy5351]

Great presentation! Thanks!

[@jacobcyriac432]

Appreciate the details of the Rafale , but I don't see anything about the Indian Rafale, which as I understand, is slightly different. Was looking to hear some of that, but there was none! Anyways greatly appreciated.

[@huizhang54]

Great post! Big fan here

[@seanpaulluke]

Great content once again! Bravo 👏

[@VishnuKamath]

I feel India should have gone for JAS as we could have brought more. India should have taken license production of Rafale. Compared to PLAAD, IAF has less fighters. We need atleast 200-300 of rafales.

[@VELS436]

Your are best aviation channel ...❤️😍 Thank you ..Please talk about helicopters too...

[@richardcarr6493]

l like the way french defenses think ,if opportunity presents itself take it :)

[@Topbuzzr]

Thank you for your youtube video. the detail is great

[@Tetemovies4]

1:10 and there's also that there was pressure to build a new fighter for the navy which the 2000 wasn't. If there was only the air force i wonder if they would have went for the 2000-9. Regarding active cancellation it is physically doable and it seems believable that it would work against older radars, but against an Aesa that can use multiple frequencies and quickly switch frequency, i have a hard time believing they would be able to effectively cancel the signal.

[@stupidburp]

Theoretically active cancellation could still work but would require a powerful computer and highly capable sensors. With the advances in computing power and sensors over the last decades, I find it plausible that such methods could still be effective, at least to some degree. There would also be a variety of other electronic warfare methods available using the same hardware and some combination of these should be able to make it much more difficult to isolate the Rafale as a target. Enough to give the Rafale an advantage in many scenarios anyways.

[@Tetemovies4]

@@stupidburp I see how lightning kick reaction times or knowledge of the frequencies program the enemy will use - assuming it's not randomized - would help but how could computer power solve that problem?

[@stupidburp]

@@Tetemovies4 It helps to react to multiple simultaneous transmissions on different frequencies and determine the matching opposite waveforms for each without delay. With a single or just a few sources this can be done with simple hardware - like noise cancellation headphones. But with a thousand different channels hopping frequencies in different patterns it becomes a much more demanding task. There are other secret ways that can use computing power to enhance electronic warfare and I am only vaguely aware of how a few of them might work but I do know that processing power is required.

[@shi01]

In case of fooling older Radars, it was already proven that this is possible with a simple hook on ECM-Pod. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bHylnqlsfaefqq8

[@kajjansson9481]

Wonder if there would be an episode with the eurofighter upcoming upgrades? Also, I cannot see any coverings of the Eurofighter - why not?

[@chas435]

Excellent informative and interesting. Big huge THANK YOU!!!!

[@vikkris]

You haven't mentioned anything specific to the Indian version and Customisation... would have been good to provide this as the title mentions India

[@anupampaul7342]

that cannot be public information ofcourse 🙂

[@neelscooldude1]

Indian customization is still not made public for obvious reasons

[@bolzdk9032]

It's for algorithm, the video probably showed up in your feed right?

[@vikkris]

@@neelscooldude1 @Anupam Paul there are already few articles online on this.... www.businessinsider.in/slideshows/tech/rafale-fighter-jets-special-features/slidelist/71278070.cms m.hindustantimes.com/india-news/france-speeds-up-rafale-fighter-jet-deliveries-on-iaf-s-special-request/story-d52eideBabhi6BG9Nhmu5J.html

[@supratiksaha2001]

Rafael is good. But nobody in India can ever forget those beautiful Mirage-2000 fighters launching bunker blasters on the hills of Kargil and of course Balakot air strike.👍👍👍👍

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

I don't know what you think but I can't look back at destruction with nostalgia, any of it, anywhere.

[@sharequsman596]

How u people can still talk about that mess as a victory is just laughable

[@ritwikg2818]

Your videos has best analysis

[@piwi2005]

Hi, I tried to found this interview from the Rafale pilot that you are citing in the end, but I could not find it. Could you post the link to that interview ? Many thanks !

[@szwrph]

I've read it some years ago, i think you must research an 5-6 years old interview.

[@Lapantouflemagic0]

i can't tell you which interview it is, but there is a former Rafale pilot on YT who said extremely similar things (look for "ATE" CHUET). that's probably something pilots are taught in military school.

[@Kenny-yl9pc]

This jet is such a beauty

[@keshavkishore3745]

That conformal fuel tanks look so cool

[@martinabowm1786]

Rafale - a typically French product! So very elegant! Only thing missing is a Bèret on the Canopy!😉

[@NATObait]

Rafale remains a better strike package as it can deliver more weapons than EFT. EFT remains a better interceptor as it has height and speed advantages. That is a basic distinction as both are capable of switching to their next best roles. But Rafale is Nuclear capable ( but only with French type) and a carrier version is available and suitable for medium carrier decks due to its size. Neither compare with F22 or F35 though due to 5th generation modernization.

[@GenoGENOVA]

Astra - Matra - MICA IR/EN - Meteor

[@Fabio-om4kb]

MICA NG bientôt ;)

[@campeador94]

These are the same videos uploaded earlier, just merged into one.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Yes, sometimes I do it. Many of my videos are fragmented in different episodes that have different viewership. Some may not even be aware that there are other videos or may not find them. As a secondary video of the week, it may be a decent service for the viewers.

[@campeador94]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech oh okay. Thanks for the clarification. Huge fan here. I have watched many of your videos. Thank you for the quality content. Appreciate it and love from India!

[@mhorasail]

Is Indian choice the right one.. what is the 5 th generation option..

[@gorabose334]

How is the combination of Rafael and SU-30MKI currently with the IAF ? How does Mirage 2000, Jaguar, MIG29 and Tejas set into the basket

[@WorldCitizenX]

Rafale, please. Merci

[@titouanreynaud1345]

The M88 has 75kN of thrust with the afterburner, you said 50kN ans that’s right but just without the afterburners.

[@stupidburp]

Safran has also tested uprated variants of M88 with over 100kN wet thrust.

[@ludovicbon5903]

@@stupidburp yes but the the structure of the plane must be modified and it needs bigger air intakes

[@denhed78]

Nice with some Swedish made baguette ;)

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

😋

[@Raj-nh3fc]

Nice catch. They are actually Swedish baguettes! But at least they are made with sour dough technique as it says on the label. It is perhaps a fine way of paying tribute to the land of the DRAKEN, the father of odd Delta wings.😃

[@WorldCitizenX]

@@Raj-nh3fc wrong, the first delta wing fighter was convair F102, usa, but nice joke anyway

[@Raj-nh3fc]

@@WorldCitizenX why let the historical facts get in the way of a cool story? 😃

[@WorldCitizenX]

@@Raj-nh3fc Because history is not his story? :)

[@durandil]

You should compare MICA to AIM-120B or C, not D. The MICA was made in early 90s and was first used by the Mirage 2000-5.

[@ethancorcoral5562]

Where did come from the interview at the end (that you acted perfectly)

[@Baby_Boomer19]

Good work brother

[@hectorherbert6585]

Note that the Rafale has 'killed' a F22 twice in simulated combat in the USA....the talent of a pilot is most important too..!!

[@kathrynck]

The Mica's "over the shoulder" firing capability has been on the AIM-120D for a while, thought it was only recently made public knowledge. This is further enhanced on the F-35 via it's 365 degree sensor suite. Also another US munition I'll leave unnamed. Mica is not the only missile with this capability. Somewhat related, a couple Russian missiles can fire at targets from a very large off-axis angle, but not "over the shoulder". These drastically change the nature of visual range air to air combat.

[@aamerjamal]

So mica is only Whats it called off bore i think missile in world nop plenty of countries build it and building it i think not 120d but aim 9x is i think

[@kathrynck]

@@aamerjamal HOBS "high off bore sight" targeting. Russian short range heat seeking missiles allow for targeting significantly off to either side. They may have similar capability with other missiles. The AIM-9X has similar ability. I'm not sure who fielded this first, since both sides kept it hush-hush for a while. This drastically changes dog-fighting mechanics. When the US build the F-22, which fires missiles from an internal bay, the issue arose of of how do you get a 'lock' when the missile is inside an internal compartment. So we had to change how it's done. Missiles had to be remade to have a virtual 'sense of space & momentum' and follow an inertial guidance until they can get a target lock. The F-22 uses it's radar to target anything in a wide cone in front of the aircraft with both short and longer ranged missiles (AIM-9X and AIM-120D). The F-35 takes this a step further, and uses a 360 degree sensor suite to allow it to target other aircraft in literally any direction, regardless of where the nose of the plane is pointed, out to a range of about 60-120 miles (less in bad weather), or about 10-20 miles with the AIM-9X. This is one of the reasons why I get kinda tired of all the comparisons between the F-22 and F-35... people don't really 'get' what the F-35 can do. Realistically, the F-22 is at a disadvantage vs an F-35, despite being more maneuverable and having a smaller RCS. Any F-22 within 80+ miles of an F-35 would be in continuous, uninterrupted, targeting threat. Plus the F-35's omni-directional IRST suite, and reduced heat emissions, allows it to counter stealth aircraft far better than the F-22. The F-35 is a monstrously capable platform. I find it shocking that we sell them to anybody, even close allies. I'm not saying the F-22 is a bad plane. Far from it. But the F-35 has much better 'toys' installed. An advantage of being developed some dozen years later. The F-22 is the better airframe, but without the new toys, it's the actually underdog between the two. An F-22 "B" could rectify that, and put it back on top. But even then the price differential favors the F-35. HOBS is making maneuverability a very secondary consideration, and re-writing the rules of air to air combat. Basically, being extremely maneuverable is now like having a great pistol sidearm, on a battlefield where everybody's wearing lvl 4 body armor. It's not the asset it once was.

[@aamerjamal]

@@kathrynck yes hobs aim9x also have it and can b guided by hmd thanks

[@NATObait]

Many missiles have this ability to "Lock on after Launch , over the shoulder abilities or Helmet Queuing" even co-operative launching where the missile is fired by a different partner from your aircraft. Simply MICA is one of many.

[@kathrynck]

@@NATObait Yeah. Although depending on a 3rd party's targeting info, it's often not entirely reliable or ideal. If the source info is from far away, it may not be the best targeting data. If your data comes from a wingman or on-board sensors, it's much better than getting it from a distant track shared via network. A far off awacs or something telling you where a target is may have a +/- of say 5 miles distance, which in close quarters could mean the difference of the missile needing to turn left or right as it exits the plane. Very robust onboard sensor suites, and strong compute power (for fast & accurate correlation of tracks) really makes these missiles shine. And it kinda deconstructs the traditional dogfight, when there's a bunch of targeting going on irrespective of nose orientation. It's kind of the next evolution of "look down/shoot down".

[@chandrachurniyogi8394]

Indian Air Force needs to upgrade it's existing fleet of 36 Dassault Rafale EH (F3-R) multi role interdictor strike fighter to F4-1R & F4-2R standards asap . . . the 50 kN Snecma M88-4E afterburning turbofan engines needs to be upgraded with high thrust variants of the Snecma M88-4E afterburning turbofan engines, either from off the shelf or tailor made . . . it'll generate somewhere around 62.9 kN of dry thrust & 88.3 kN in full afterburner mode . . . a 4.5 gen multi role fighter jet able to supercruise at Mach 2.3 needs way more powerful turbofan engines, period . . . especially when a Rafale F4-R is laden with fuel & weaponry . . . new built brand new Dassault Rafale EH (F4-R) multi role interdictor strike fighter will feature 56% composite airframe & 44% advanced lithium alloys . . . specific reinforcements incorporated into the fuselage & wings, wherever necessary in the airframe . . . plus strengthened forward & aft landing gears . . . all glass touchscreen cockpit & new highly advanced zero-zero Martin Baker Mk21 pilot ejection seat, that is custom made for the Dassault Rafale F4-R multi role interdictor strike fighter only . . . improved fly-by-wire controls & AESA radar . . . the Indian Air Force is seriously considering acquiring an additional fleet of 83 - 89 brand new Dassault Rafale F4-R multi role interdictor strike fighter by 2028 . . . alongwith it's dedicated airframe specific air-to-air & air-to-surface ordinance . . .

[@michaelrunnels7660]

If you feel an obligation to show a baguette if you show a French fighter, then please show a hot dog when you show an American fighter.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Fair enough! I will remember that!

[@VishalJoshi-sk8ll]

Very Elegant & Elobrate session ...Merci...

[@googlebhai7529]

What's is the part in tail ? Box type 😁

[@benmol_]

It's a part of the spectra system (electronic warfare / incoming missiles detection / "active stealth")

[@googlebhai7529]

@@benmol_ wow , thank you 🙏

[@hectorherbert6585]

at 22.25 this pic (close-up) of the cockpit shows the build quality of this marvel...

[@MrM970]

Very funky background music 😊

[@vhira]

Very interesting video 👍🏻

[@RP-qs1tp]

I think we should order 90 more as, 45 for IAF and 45 for IN as Navy also needs extra fighters. Reason is, we planned 126 aircraft, with the new uniform command policy we will have all 90 available when required. Rafale is very costly so we cannot invest more even if we want and we should spend the rest on Indian projects. Having one plane will save ISE costs and SCM costs as well. ( Having one more foreign plane F18 for IN even though good will not have these advantages )

[@amitwali3565]

Rafale naval version may not be compatible with vikramaditya or any of the future aircraft carriers of Indian navy which under construction as rafale naval version doesn't come with foldable wings.

[@RP-qs1tp]

@@amitwali3565 Yes, but its already smaller in size than F18 so thats the reason it does not have and need those foldable wings

[@bjornnordstrom]

Who are ”we”?

[@RP-qs1tp]

@@bjornnordstrom Indians, as the heading pointed to India so I used it general as its about Rafale and Indian aircraft purchases

[@RP-qs1tp]

@@bjornnordstrom Story is around 2004 India put out a request for 126 medium weight fighters, Rafale won in around 2012 but nothing moved forward. In 2016 GOI decided to purchase 36 Rafale as stop gap and so India is still short by 90 aircrafts from original plan after 16 years :) . There is again a tender out in market for 114 MWF aircrafts. There is also a 2nd tender for 57 carrier based aircrafts for 2nd carrier. That is short summary and background :).

[@prakrit8284]

Video on Difference between stable and unstable design of plane please?

[@rexxbailey2764]

OHH DATS A NICE ONE! 👌👍

[@atlet1]

Rafale spercruise at M1.4 clean. Gripen E supercruise at M1.2+ with 6missiles and centertank. Rafale can carry 14000kg of fuel an weapons. Gripen E can carry 8500kg of fuel and weapons and need much less fuel.

[@UnePintade]

"Need much less fuel" I wonder why 🤔

[@MS-pm7rh]

Rafale supercruise at Mach 1.4 with 6 Mica missiles and Mach 1.2 with 4 Mica missiles and a 1250 l center tank . It is the only fighter who can carry 150% of its empty load.

[@atlet1]

@@UnePintade less drag and single engine.

[@atlet1]

@@MS-pm7rh 14/10*100=140% 8.5/8*100=106%. Rafale can take 14/8.5*100=165% of Gripen E load. To compare usefull load, we have to guess the difference in fuel consumption: Gripen E have internal fuel of 3400kg and Rafale may need 180% of that. 1.8*3400=6120. 6120-1400=1420. Gripen E can take 8500-3400=5100. 6120/5100*100=120% of useful load, compared to Gripen E. Yes, Rafale seem to be a very potent fighter airplane in many different missions. Just as Gripen E. One reason is the close coupled delta-canard configuration. The two fighters is the only ones in the world with that.

[@UnePintade]

@@atlet1 that was a joke ...