China can have it buy it has no experience fighting so not to worried
@YouTube_Censors_Me4 сағат бұрын
The J stands for Junk!!! Chinas military is a paper lion would get shredded!!!
@KingOfKings346 сағат бұрын
They could have made the mid engine a ramjet, sad, missed opportunity
@TjahjadiTedjasaputra7 сағат бұрын
Amerika dan Barat melupakan buat Rakyat Tiongkok jika negara membutuhkan dalam hitungan jam 1 miliyard lebih rakyat tiongkok berubah menjadi Tentara pembebasan Rakyat. Lihat contoh gempa bumi tibet belum lama ini, itulah mobilisasi Rakyat Tiongok, mereka mengambil semua bagian dari yang di butuhkan Negara.
@samad32517 сағат бұрын
US can afford everything with the paper money. 😊
@altafahmed51237 сағат бұрын
For the sake of conventional logic. 😀
@klardfarkus38917 сағат бұрын
They already have the b21. NGAD adds nothing new to that capability. Just another of many wastes of money on useless equipment
@enoga32839 сағат бұрын
Is there a pilot inside ?
@賴志偉-d7h9 сағат бұрын
Project costs in the US are inflated because most of the money goes to the top brass and there are too many hands to pay off. And too little are achieved with too much money.
@atomixfang9 сағат бұрын
The 21st century will belong to China and trump will open the door to the decline of the empire.
@Gunni197210 сағат бұрын
So that's what Otis was doing as a side job?
@shafrannilamdeen285610 сағат бұрын
OK why can't it be a RC model to create propaganda?
@明明-t9c10 сағат бұрын
确保没有下一个乌克兰,确保美国利益集团和美国政府爱好和平
@shafrannilamdeen285610 сағат бұрын
What the heck man? Jet name sounds similar to their phone name
@damirbajic457911 сағат бұрын
Why are people surprised? Most of the thing we own is made in China including the things we type in the comments.
@t3h51d3w1nd3r11 сағат бұрын
I love thise channel. great discussions and full of info.
@Millennium7HistoryTech5 сағат бұрын
Glad you enjoy it!
@horusfalcon11 сағат бұрын
Thanks for the reporting on this, and for continuing to admit what you don't know about it. Is this aircraft possibly a drone? What I didn't see in the views provided was the upper surfaces. (only "artist renderings" which can be misleading...)
@СлавьсяРоссия12 сағат бұрын
США вы должны гордится русскими по одной причине , именно мы сегодня наводим порядок после вашего вмешивания в другие страны
@scottbigler918212 сағат бұрын
Chinese have no experience in a war, unless you consider WW II, many technological advances are done by battlefield experience, advantage America.
@МистерФанни-з4к12 сағат бұрын
А представтте что каждая боеголовка в орешнике, оснащенная ядерным стержнем, который по мощности сравнима с херосимой. А их в ракете 6
@МистерФанни-з4к12 сағат бұрын
Кстати чертежи царь бомбы не были уничтожены. ТАМ БОЕГОЛОВКА БЫЛА В 50 МЕГАТОНН. Для справки взрывная волна обогнула земной шар несколько раз
@hooks463814 сағат бұрын
👍🏻👍🏻 You always do an excellent job, especially in your research. I also appreciate that you don't rely on hyperbole to keep things interesting. You have an excellent channel Sir. Please, keep it up. 👏🏻👏🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@fftt936014 сағат бұрын
Yahh but USA is kicking China rear on comments in the more popular videos!
@cadetsparklez330015 сағат бұрын
ive been hearing alot of talk about NASAMS from the sloppy youtubers who dont know anything, would be interested in a video from you!!
@pedronobrega545715 сағат бұрын
About you inventing names .... dont you realize that 'the fack checkers' does not verify facts ??? what they really do its to censor information :) the bad comments that you have recived its not checking facts .. its censor information to not go againts the dogma they belive in .... good work by the way ..
@lukas_94115 сағат бұрын
Good stuff
@WeAllLaughDownHere-ne2ou15 сағат бұрын
China's Naval and aerospace capabilities are advancing at lightning speed meanwhile the American Congress is forcing the US Air Force to keep flying the A10, forcing the Navy to keep building LCS, refuses to BRAC surplus stateside bases, and won't give the Navy the money it needs to expand its port and ship building infrastructure. This battle is already lost.
@tommerrill761815 сағат бұрын
👍 good
@gregp737915 сағат бұрын
Alot of China experts here that have never set one foot in China. I went back for my 10th trip. The economy is hurting, many shops are poorly frequented or closed, not a single crane I saw was actually in use. Now it doesn't tell all the story, but it is not a good indication.
@chokwoo572016 сағат бұрын
So glad the technology is in the hands of civilized nation, instead of nation founded with genocide and slavery
@mentalpot16 сағат бұрын
Looks to me that the 2 outer "control surfaces" on either side are not "control surfaces". This is the reason that they have no actuators. They are in a fixed position. I believe that the outer edges were added when the goblins realised that they could not make this thing fly. Sure, never underestimate your enemy but always remember, like their orc frenemies, the goblins occupy the land of tofu construction. Personally I have little doubt that the primary building materials of the J36 are chewing gum, duct tape and string.
@renegadekav16 сағат бұрын
US NGAD flew at least 3 demonstrators which "broke records" as far back as 5 years ago. NGAD is on hold because it may not be needed. They are doing the smart thing by taking their time, they have the ability to anyway.
@hagankeys361014 сағат бұрын
Is it the one flown by Tom Cruise?
@renegadekav13 сағат бұрын
@@hagankeys3610 That's sr-72 mockup.
@nickbrough833512 сағат бұрын
@@renegadekav i quite help wondering why so many commentators on this channel love Russia and China and keep spouting Russian and chinese propaganda as if they know more than china has ever released
@directxxxx7111 сағат бұрын
@@nickbrough8335Did your great and rich democratic government pay up all your student loans and property tax for you? Do your voted government really represent you? Do they even provide you free ambulance?😂😂😂
@srijanme11 сағат бұрын
Not the money though 😂😂😂
@outman620716 сағат бұрын
why in china, medical insurance is $300 a year, no property tax, income tax is 5%, no purchase tax/tips. Even labour worker can afford 3 meal in restaurant every day, zero homeless, zero drug issue(any drug dealer simply get death sentence) As CHINESE, let me tell you this: Believe it or not, the main reason is Chinese goverment system is BETTER. Chinese system is based on ideology. the main purpose is for the people's good, it doesnt matter if people like it or not. just like chinese parrent do, you will go to doctor or engineer, it doesnt matter you like it or not, and sometimes they would make you by beating. here is thing, #1 difference is politic accountability, in china if politician dont do well, or make some progress, you could end up with jail( my father working in prison, 3 of his warden went to jail in a row, because they didnt perform well for covid policy) #2, they dont play by book, for example, Yun Ma, the richest chinese wanna build another system for financing system, and everything was legal, but its like those dangerous financial game played in Wall Street, was stopped by CCP without a reason. The key point is government is controlling the money, not contrast. One example, if Boeing is in china, its ceos, every directors, and EVEN governor will go to jail or death sentence. (1 chinese example, SanLu milk powder issue, 4 kids dead, then 3 company worker got death sentence, company founder life sentence and a dozen relating worker went to jail, more than dozen governor fired)
@davdav13704 сағат бұрын
was stopped by CCP without a reason -> It was stopped with reason, as all profits would go to Ma, but all liability to China.
@RobertTapia16 сағат бұрын
Paper tigers?
@Neeboopsh16 сағат бұрын
lol the deblurring is hilarious defense news is run by a bunch of war hawks that have an agenda. i get shit for giving credit to foreign adversaries for technological prowess. as if i am some china hawk or some putin puppet. i like technologies and warfare stuff. we should be doing better here in the west
@thomas_jay17 сағат бұрын
The Chinese have the J-20 and the J-35, both of which are fairly new and which fulfill certain roles. Maybe it's easy to think about what the Chinese currently don't have in order to find out what roles these two new airplanes are meant for.
@profo454417 сағат бұрын
You can literally draw a straight line from the engine inlet, to the outlet thats not good for stealth, the radar will find the fans also nothing to slow down the air before it reaches the turbines for supersonic speed, this is why s ducts are used. The wingtips are nothing new, the YF-23 had this style of wingtip, you can google this.. Also this has visual actuators (bumps) near all of the control surfaces, so does the other one they released. Northrop's Yf-23 also had no visible actuators anywhere, and is what 30 years at most older than these airframes lol. The wingtip style was literally used on the YF-23 in what 1990 ?
@flaggschiffen17 сағат бұрын
You can't draw a straight line from inlet to outlet otherwise they would't be able to fit the weapon bay's depths. It has to be a S-duct internally.
@profo454416 сағат бұрын
@@flaggschiffen I thought this to at first, its an assumption, but both of them you can do this with both the J50 and j36 both very different designs and very different sizes, both you can draw the line. The j36 is big enough to where none of this is an issue, yet it still has straight on ducts, both also use splitters as opposed to something lifting the boundary layer air off, both especially the j36 has big bulky actuator bumps on the underside of the airframe. We found answers to this type of stuff in the late 1980s. The b-2 spirit for example, expensive, but the tech was ahead of its time, and the yf-23 wich adopted tech from the b-2.
17 сағат бұрын
Perhaps the CCP is trying to lock the US into an over spending trap like the US did to the USSR under Reagan. I don't think it'll work this time round due to the CCPs penchant for self delusion and their own shaky economy. Not to mention the difference in the ability to free think the next big tech advances.
@DIREWOLFx7517 сағат бұрын
"the world is upside down" Nah, you just haven't been paying attention what's been happening the last 20 years if you think that. Extremely simplified, a study in IIRC 2019, found that RF physical production economy was roughly 80% of USAs, while China's was OVER 10 times the size of USAs. And while research wasn't quite along the same lines, RF was far better compared to population than USA, while China was not, but still overall had far more capability in total.
@KKMan20xx18 сағат бұрын
Why can China afford it but the US can't? It is because China is actually the largest economy in the world in terms of PPP. Also, China's military production is purpose-driven while the US is profit driven.
@renegadekav16 сағат бұрын
5 rmb and plus 50 social credit score credit.
@NickyDekker8918 сағат бұрын
Has America really been sleeping for the last 40 years?
@din0kill18 сағат бұрын
USA should just copy it / steal Chinese tech.
@MoniDabas-ou2uz18 сағат бұрын
Watched a few videos over the years and its the most balanced and intelligent analysis of military equipment.