The public vote goes to Rafale based on the applauses this performance received among the audience. An ace as a pilot!
@pasimiettinen24782 жыл бұрын
Also Rafale booth personnel looked very aerodynamically efficient😁
@iankuah86063 жыл бұрын
Total control over speed and altitude - this is real precision flying!
@panu55753 жыл бұрын
Standing right there at 1:34 was the highlight of my entire year
@robertwilliams28503 жыл бұрын
That was an over the field pass with a Split-S landing. Perfectly executed. 👍🏻
@bradyjohn77993 жыл бұрын
i guess Im kinda randomly asking but do anybody know of a good place to stream new movies online?
@Thankz4sharing3 жыл бұрын
When I see "Most Amazing ***** Ever" on KZbin I figure it's clickbait. Not this time.
@Fabio-om4kb3 жыл бұрын
Et il se pose comme une fleur, magnifique.
@virajar96313 жыл бұрын
Superb landing and pilot's skills!
@greyman00003 жыл бұрын
Watching this jet land conjures an image in my head of a raptor swooping low to grab its prey. So beautiful to see.
@gliderboy4383 жыл бұрын
Saw this done by an Italian Fiat G91 at Farnborough in 1964 :-) Pretty impressive all the same.
@ronbros3 жыл бұрын
pilots and planes keep getting better!
@natioffline3 жыл бұрын
Superb, thank you very much for sharing
@Dzordzikk3 жыл бұрын
Wow, never seend before landings like this with jet ... Respect.
@dmutant26353 жыл бұрын
The good ones make it look easy...This guy makes it look easier.
@celtoroma40133 жыл бұрын
The math for Finland may actually be the following: Not contested air space?: Gripen! (Use case: Brazil, Czech republic) Contested air space?: F16 block 52! (Use case: UAE, Greece) Highly contested air and terrestrial space?: RAFALE (Use cases: India & Greece)
@williamf.76553 жыл бұрын
Whatever contested Airspace but hope on the US army to make the defense: F35: uk, italy, netherlands, belgium, australia, Norway, Danemark.
@goldorak32513 жыл бұрын
@@williamf.7655 Sure !! They all chose the F35 for its performances...WTF ! Most of them now understand their catastrophic decision.
@vtecharrys.69813 жыл бұрын
@FUCK SHIT Yup. The F35 orders have stopped for some time now. The US was pushing Greece to order them in 2019, then again in early 2020 and told them they must order now or the price will go up in 2021. Greece just ignored them. Now the US is back again with another formal letter and NO price increase, asking Greece to place the order this year or they will face price increases and this and that. They are pushing hard to get the order. Greece is still ignoring them and have announced that they will be placing a 2nd order for more Rafale's! They did their homework on the F35, they are not stupid. Egypt also just placed an order this week for 40 Rafales, and in the meantime (70?) Rafales for India are being built now, and they will be delivering the first batch at the end of this year I believe. I think in a couple of years France will have sold more Rafales than F35's the US has sold to other countries.
@Ante-I3 жыл бұрын
@@vtecharrys.6981 Croatia delayed decision, we choose between Rafale and new F16 viper. USA make some political pressure, but F16 viper is really good plane, so i dont care. I hope we choose Rafale. For F35, that is too expensive, and we need to see how that work in real fight.
@brianmays17313 жыл бұрын
@@williamf.7655 Israel
@marsupiomarsupi44213 жыл бұрын
OK; it's only a show.. But Rafale jet is a effective fighter too. One example: January 13, 2013: AQMI (Al Qaeda) trucks are rushing towards Bamako, 500 km south... Malian troops are soon to be defeated. Malian government activate the France-Mali Defence Agreement. 6 Rafale fighter jets loaded with GBUs take off from Northern France and fly to Mali. The jets flew over France, Mediterranean sea, Morocco and Mauritania in order to avoid Algeria, refueled three times during the trip (French Air Force operates 14 KC-135F, to be replaced by 15 Airbus A330). About six hours after takeoff, AQMI columns are stopped by Rafale jets. Landing in Chad after 9h 35mn in flight.. Almost a 10 hour mission.
@borisjohnson14733 жыл бұрын
Operates 10 KC-135 I believe.
@halnineooo1363 жыл бұрын
Rafale is indeed an excellent well balanced machine. I hope France will pull off the joint next gen fighter program with Germany, Airbus / EADS is just eyeballing Dassault's expertise and will probably draw the project into the same industrial non sense as the Eurofighter was.
@henriso23 жыл бұрын
It’s an amazing weapon I agree. What I find ridiculous and unfortunately it’s a sample of the French decadence, it’s the fact that France has nearly 15,000 boots on the ground in Mali since nearly 8 years, and they have to bring air support from northern France, and avoiding Algeria!!!! This is really stupid tactics and strategy. But, what can we expect from a guy like Macron???
@halnineooo1363 жыл бұрын
@@henriso2 How would you have done it?
@ostsakhaltor88683 жыл бұрын
@@henriso2 Did you read the commentary correctly. The date shown is January 13, 2013. 2013 ! Avoiding Algeria is a political reason given the relationship between France and Algeria.
@nigeh53263 жыл бұрын
Smooth as silk landing 👍😊
@GOASTRC3 жыл бұрын
Negative tower, I'm making my own approach!
@34136TS3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, downwind checklist complete, short final? haha
@dimitrisnomikos82153 жыл бұрын
Waiting for them in Greece.. Adore France adore rafales
@Ante-I3 жыл бұрын
We, in Croatia waiting for them, too.. Rafale or F-16 viper.. Greece have F16 Viper? What is better? Rafale is great, but Viper is great too in some stuff, (AESA radar).. My wish is Rafale, its better to make stronger Europe defence industry.
@drdoolittle57243 жыл бұрын
wonder how many 'payments' were made to your generals to help with the purchase!
@Hypernefelos3 жыл бұрын
@@Ante-I Greece already has over 100 F-16s, so upgrading most of them to the Viper standard is a cost-effective way to increase their capabilities. Croatia doesn't have a pre-existing F-16 fleet, so it will be more expensive for it, per plane, to get them set up. That said, French planes are notoriously more expensive to support with spare parts, because they tend to have far smaller production runs than American ones. That has made Greece's Mirage 2000s more expensive to operate than its F-16s. I don't know how it will be with the Rafale vs F-35, but I expect that the Rafale may end up being more expensive in the long run. Still, it's a very capable fighter and, as you said, it helps support the European defence industry. This is especially important to Greece at the moment, as it's in an informal coalition with France to contain Turkey.
@deckdeckard52973 жыл бұрын
@@Ante-I Your wish has been granted. Congratulations ! 🥳👍
@NATObait3 жыл бұрын
Croatia getting 12 second hand jets will they have AESA radars ? Also 12 second hand jets for Greece . Could be good deal again dependent on version and condition.
@bi50483 жыл бұрын
truly amazing. Even I can't do that with my scooter.
@muhammadfarhankhan71473 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@souravmukherjee19613 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@ERICSAW3 жыл бұрын
😂😂🤣
@Entermagnetic3 жыл бұрын
well, you can try!
@nisheethshukla61423 жыл бұрын
As of today, Indian Air Force got 15 of them and by April end 21. By the end of 2021 all 36 ordered Rafales will be handed over to IAF. Dassault has amazing production rate. Hopefully in MMRCA 2.0 deal also Rafale gets selected.
@st-ex85063 жыл бұрын
The next lot of Rafales delivered to India will be with a complimentary additional O2 cylinder... just in case...
@LarsHofman3 жыл бұрын
This maneuver has the potential to be very dangerous. Many airshow accidents happen with a half reverse Cuban 8. A combination of being too fast and too low is key to disaster. Either way, a very skilled pilot and indeed an amazing airshow finish.
@Dibona013 жыл бұрын
Magnifique atterrissage c'est toujours ce qui me surprend le plus avec cet appareil. Une vitesse particulièrement basse qui lui permet d' apponter aisément sûr le CDG qui est un bâtiment relativement court par rapport à ses homologues américains. Évidemment tout cela n' est obtenu que par une parfaite adéquation entre toutes les surfaces de voilure et une avionique raffinée. Bravo aux concepteurs et à nos militaires de l' armée de l' air et de l' espace de toujours le faire progresser. Quand je vois encore ces parachutes de freinage se déployer derrière certains autres avions je trouve tellement dépassés.
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
Rafales papers et corruption active de Dassault aviation
@@Pasdidentifiant00 va enfin bosser dans ta vie feignant entretenu par des copains maghrébins
@Pasdidentifiant003 жыл бұрын
@@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa8454 suis rentier ducon...
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
@@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa8454 vu ton commentaire anti français c'est plutôt toi le maghrébin...
@didierlemoine67713 жыл бұрын
very short landing, impressiv !
@whisthpo3 жыл бұрын
Artist !
@Milo300663 жыл бұрын
Hey there is a white orb at the 3 to 4 second mark on the video. You could see it on slow motion too in the last part.
@parthoghosh58093 жыл бұрын
India is proud to be part of the Rafael team 👍
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
RAFALE, please...
@nghonleong3 жыл бұрын
that's the benefit of a delta wing......which effectively acts as brake at the correct pitch angle.
@ravishankar-zl9ru3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful. I love rafile. Great.
@Soussmeboules3 жыл бұрын
They did it many times with the Rafale. The most impressive video of this landing has been filmed 2 or 3 years ago in Switzerland. It is available on KZbin. You have a better view of the landing manoeuvre because the cameraman is filming in higher altitude than the airfield.
@kolerick3 жыл бұрын
for those interested: kzbin.info/www/bejne/f5inZYSsrc15r7c
@Soussmeboules3 жыл бұрын
@@kolerick Yes that one. ;)
@SouperAsH3 жыл бұрын
Curious to know how the throttle was being worked, through this process. It almost looked like the pilot dropped to idle, just before the apogee of that loop.
@yenaurapourtoulmonde3 жыл бұрын
Superbe ! C'est aussi grâce aux plans-canard, car on est vraiment aux grands angles, limite décrochage dynamique. Bravo au pilote et aux ingénieurs de Dassault !
@gillescharvet3 жыл бұрын
@@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa8454 c’est vrai qu’a la place faut acheter amercain ... pathetique. Bravo pour le boulot
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
@@gillescharvet ha ben dis donc tu te réveilles seulement à midi un jeudi de travail feignant entretenu par des copains communistes et tout de suite tu viens ici nous empester avec ton haleine fétide au lieu d’aller enfin bosser dans ta vie ?
@@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa8454 mais bien sûr..., on a très bien compris que t'es membre d'AQMI ou de l' IS...
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
@@leneanderthalien = pourriture de mauvais français qui traite lâchement de terroriste tous ceux qui ne pensent pas comme lui !
@Musgrave123 жыл бұрын
Perfection. Brilliant flying.
@WASRGP3 жыл бұрын
That pilot is a BOSS!! 🖤👊🏼🤘🏼✌🏼 Unfk'nbelieveably smooth!
@paulrandig3 жыл бұрын
How do you get rid of the speed you have from free falling in such a short time?
@situbes.9723 жыл бұрын
That is an amazing landing, how do they bleed off air speed (on the way down) to have it slow enough to land?
@LeoH3L13 жыл бұрын
Delta wings are naturally good at bleeding off speed, he would have put the engines to idle and used the wing itself as a big airbrake, and balanced descent rate and speed with AOA changes, kind of gliding it in, the key to it will be the entry speed and altitude when he begins.
@situbes.9723 жыл бұрын
@@LeoH3L1 Thanks. I knew that delta wings could tolerate a higher AoA but didnt know you could use as an airbrake (atleast that drastically). I watch some youtube on Concord. They said it couldn't have flap. (I am not sure if it could have slats). So can delta wings have slates? Does this particular jet have surface control on front small wings?
@LeoH3L13 жыл бұрын
@@situbes.972 Leading edge slats yes, having flaps would cause a nose down rotation though without a tail. In the case of a pure delta like a Mirage 2000 you couldn't have flap. The Rafale's canards move, and perform a similar function to elevators on a conventional layout, so you could have some flap on a delta-canard, but not much at all, whether that's ever done though.... I can't think of any that do.
@AB-vc7ox3 жыл бұрын
Wind resistance pure and simple, consider the wing surface area, compared to other fighters it’s a flying airbrake.
@philippehoudoin27213 жыл бұрын
@@LeoH3L1 Rafale's canards can be seen in some airbrake position sometimes, it supported by flying envelop computer.
@RedNovembers3 жыл бұрын
awsome skills! great
@tomsmodeltime66623 жыл бұрын
That's some badass crazy high alpha landing!
@christianlebordelais2 жыл бұрын
Cool spotting
@ericlozen96313 жыл бұрын
Very Impressive - It would be ridiculous to try and compare it with the F-35 and AV-8B because those aircraft were developed around the whole concept of STOLV performance. While in the military I worked on the F-14D Tomcat and F/A-18C Hornet. I saw them in action countless times and never got tired or bored from seeing them do their magic.
@deckdeckard52973 жыл бұрын
ONLY the B variant of the F-35 is STOVL. It is perfectly relevant to compare the Rafale with the F-35A (conventional take-off and landing) and the F-35C (for CATOBAR aircraft carriers).
@ericlozen96313 жыл бұрын
@@deckdeckard5297 Thank's for the information. I served on CV-43, CV-60, and CVN-71.
@moriver38573 жыл бұрын
Great skill and situational awareness.
@yashbirsingh16733 жыл бұрын
Beautiful soft landing 👍
@pcrnicki3 жыл бұрын
Great, but nothing new for Rafale display pilots. I was watching the Rafale on Airpower 2016 live six years ago when Cpt Jean Guillaume Martinez “Marty” performed the same landing at the end of his display. Very very attractive to viewers. Bravo for Rafal display pilots !!!
@BytebroUK3 жыл бұрын
My Navy friend just said "practising that stuff onto a carrier will make it look easy on an airfield".
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
Les pilotes de chasse de l’aviation française sont des gros lâche en opérations extérieures
@BytebroUK3 жыл бұрын
@@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa8454 I'm slightly struggling with my translation, so "lâche" is "loose"? So "are a bit loose/not great overseas", is that what you are saying? I'm not going to disagree, but just trying to understand.
@ericroger926 Жыл бұрын
Laches = cowards. According to him … I am only translating 😊
@dogwalker6663 жыл бұрын
Delta wing landings always look cool!
@JohnSmith-ci2vu3 жыл бұрын
Australia should have these instead of the ridiculously expensive F35’s.
@iblesbosuok3 жыл бұрын
How many G are those?
@sulek1233 жыл бұрын
sick skill .... good one
@supercat3802 жыл бұрын
This is one damn good pilot!!!
@mandeadmandead66243 жыл бұрын
Best plane for sure
@RKZX23 жыл бұрын
check out the Rafale routine from Switzerland from 2018 or 2019. not sure.
@philippehoudoin27213 жыл бұрын
This one? kzbin.info/www/bejne/f5inZYSsrc15r7c 2017. Great image quality, with a beautiful background. And Split-S landing at end.
@nicholasroberts69543 жыл бұрын
How the fluffin-hell does he scrub-off all that airspeed from the dive so quickly ? The wing wasn't particularly high-alpha prior to touch-down. He's obviously been practising and, I recall, that earlier versions of the Rafale display routine did include a finale where they climbed to several hundred feet, rolled on to its back inverted , dropped (?) the gear and then righted and reversed track through a descending curve before setting down at the end of the runway, but that involved far more space and gave the opportunity to scrub the speed-off gradually . . .but even given this, how did he scrub off so much speed in so little distance/space ?
@34136TS3 жыл бұрын
....during which time he lowers the gear! Everyone else is pulling back on the stick for dear life 🤣 Makes absolutely no sense at all
@nicholasroberts69543 жыл бұрын
'suppose the extra drag of the lowered gear, if lowered early in the dive, limits the gravity inspired speed gain . . And must make it easier to pull the nose up. Works, as long as you do it below 300 knots, otherwise, I understand, the gear parts company from the main plane.
@34136TS3 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasroberts6954 I wonder what the minimum speed is for the gear down? It's certainly not delicate... www.safran-landing-systems.com/landing-gears/military-aircraft/dassault-rafale
@nicholasroberts69543 жыл бұрын
@@34136TS 120 Knots is the landing speed according to :- www.dassault-aviation.com/en/defense/rafale/specifications-and-performance-data/ . . .and that's going to be with some degree of flapperon deployment . . so add 10-15 knots to that . . . and then add another 10-15 knots for safety as the delta planform begins to become a high-drag device at anything other than near zero alpha, . . . so add a total of 20-30 knots to the landing speed (At low altitude/high air density) giving a viable aerodynamic envelope for that aerial display maneouvre of 140-150 to 270-300 knots . .so just over a 100 knots leeway to perform the manoeuvre successfully ???? Remember, when you talking about damage to gear due to deployment at too high a speed, your not talking about the main oleos and their capacity to absorb high shock loads, your talking about the more lightly engineered and fragile stays which hold the gear in the locked position. From my understanding, if they get bent, then even a lowered gear will not lock . . and that matters . . . . . unless you're driving an A-10 or similar ! A lowered and locked gear is essential for successful landing. On another point, I'm amazed how quickly the driver was able to come to rest without a drag chute - look at the Dassault spec. You could almost do an unarrested super carrier landing in the distance he took, but then again, that aircraft was an exceptionally "Clean" airframe, not sporting the aerodynamic limiting impedimentia of an in-service warplane.
@34136TS3 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasroberts6954 Yeah, I agree with your ball-parks - which makes it even more remarkable! The beefy gear is hardy low drag was where I was coming from, although the forces are different of course. Great pilot, great plane!
@larrymiller4653 жыл бұрын
C'est magnifique!!!
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
Destructeur de l’humanité cet avion avec sa pollution sonore et atmosphérique
@tolitsdterrible47853 жыл бұрын
That was awesome!
@mikmerl13 жыл бұрын
Split-S maneuver transitioning to landing procedure. Very impressive for a jet fighter aircraft!!
@rangganuganu31153 жыл бұрын
Fantastic landing
@roygradidge75383 жыл бұрын
Wow! best i have seen!
@rahulnair78963 жыл бұрын
Smooth landing.....
@tanzidane2 жыл бұрын
Very good low speed handling
@geraldheinig42053 жыл бұрын
Very nice!
@markcherriman61363 жыл бұрын
Perfection .
@muraliradhakrishna1673 жыл бұрын
Have seen this landing in Bangalore also
@chrisjung35383 жыл бұрын
Dassaut fabrique les meilleures avions. Y a pas photo. Le futur avion de l’armée 🇨🇭.
@Victor_Gvne3 жыл бұрын
On espère !
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
Destructeur de vie sur terre
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
@@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa8454 on a bien compris que t'es le meilleur pote des terroristes islamistes égorgeurs d'innocents, alors va répandre ta désinformation ailleurs...
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
@@leneanderthalien = une pourriture de mauvais français qui traite lâchement de terroriste tous ceux qui ne pensent pas comme lui !
@amirozani12123 жыл бұрын
This plane can hover in mid air Amazing stuff. Can the f-15/16 do that ?
@rihaskell48123 жыл бұрын
F15 and f16 are 1960s and 1970s technology. Lol speaks volumes that they are still active to this very day
@amirozani12123 жыл бұрын
@@rihaskell4812 but can they hover like that ? I think the Russian mig 35 can do that to
@rihaskell48123 жыл бұрын
@@amirozani1212 the British harriers (developed in 1960s) could hover.
@amirozani12123 жыл бұрын
@@rihaskell4812 of course he is build for that with rotating engine. The mig wasn't built for that !!
@rihaskell48123 жыл бұрын
@@amirozani1212 why do you keep talking about MIGs? They do not have VTOL. The Yak did but, once again, developed in the 60s. The pegasus engine has nothing to do with VTOL. It's the management of the thrust vectoring. Lol you need to work on your history
@RalphEllis3 жыл бұрын
So that was a vertical base-leg. Not and ‘etap de base’, but an ‘etap de verticale’. Interesting.
@tamasgutpinter3423 жыл бұрын
Awesome
@acquario5993 жыл бұрын
when the plane flips over and the pulls out the cart, you can see a Ufo passing by and then splashing away.
@natioffline3 жыл бұрын
It’s not the sun’s reflection?
@ZubairKhan-vs8fe3 жыл бұрын
Wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Never seen this before
@franckcavalier37013 жыл бұрын
Dispose-t-il de tuyères à poussé vectorielle ou d'inverseurs de poussé ?
@roybatty19723 жыл бұрын
Non pas besoin, l'appareil est suffisamment léger.
@franckcavalier37013 жыл бұрын
Merci Roy mais ma question ne concernait pas la distance d'atterrissage mais l'ultra-manœuvrabilité et l'attaque en piqué accentué à très basse vitesse.
@roybatty19723 жыл бұрын
@@franckcavalier3701 Pour la raison que j'ai évoqué, le risque de décrochage aérodynamique est fortement réduit par rapport aux homologues Russes et américains dont la charge alaire est supérieure. Leur masse à sec est double, c'est 4 fois plus d'énergie cinétique...
@franckcavalier37013 жыл бұрын
@@roybatty1972, de cela je n'ai jamais douté mais je me demandais simplement si ce bel oiseau était capable d'effectuer un freinage aérodynamique de type "Kort Parad" ou "Cobra de Pougatchev", ou de pointer un objectif situé au dessous (ou derrière lui) de lui sans conversion d'altitude en énergie (accélération) à la manière du Saab 105 ou du Saab Ja-37 Viggen.
@roybatty19723 жыл бұрын
@@franckcavalier3701 pour le cobra ou ou le nez bas, je pense que oui, pour le reste je ne sais pas.
@corvanphoenix3 жыл бұрын
Finland's fighter jet competition makes it an awesome time to have an Air Show in Finland! :D
@NGYT403 жыл бұрын
Awesome!!!!
@Alexduvsg3 жыл бұрын
ty , nice vidéos ! :p
@Francis-zw6rt3 жыл бұрын
Love it
@michaelshore23003 жыл бұрын
What was amazing ? that it landed successfully ?
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
With a common fighter without thrust vectoring is this figure impossible
@shanevickyware40103 жыл бұрын
That the world's best fighter
@drdoolittle57243 жыл бұрын
Could well be wrong but would you need a computer to work out that sequence!
@philippehoudoin27213 жыл бұрын
Rafale is a fully fly-by-wire flight controlled plane. Without this computer, Rafale is aerodynamically unstable in fact, by design.
@drdoolittle57243 жыл бұрын
@@philippehoudoin2721 ...was thinking about the manoeuvre rather than the plane!
@philippehoudoin27213 жыл бұрын
@@drdoolittle5724 oh. No, it not done by a computer, the pilot do it.
@PETE49553 жыл бұрын
The Rafael is a real effective fight tool not a flighing computer that can be compromised by a phone call !
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
RAFALE please: Rafael was a 15° century painter (rafale means "wind gust" in french, or "burst fire"...
@Arun436473 жыл бұрын
Oh....... Wow! I have never ever seen a plane landing like this!!! Truly amazing video 😛 KZbin please introduce moron filters ASAP! 🙄
@drewblackmatter66693 жыл бұрын
Wellcome too hellenic AIRSPACE NAW IS INIOHOS 2021 TIME. THANK FRANCE
@fabricecambres27773 жыл бұрын
French jet, French pilot; French Army.
@helvetia19783 жыл бұрын
I hope sooooo much that the Swiss Gov. will choose to purchase this for our F-18 replacement!!
@veragon45053 жыл бұрын
Il préfère le fer à repasser américain xD
@andreactuel72093 жыл бұрын
@@veragon4505 non le F35 n’a litérallement aucune chance en Suisse. Les favoris sont le Super Hornet (F-18) et le Rafale
@NATObait3 жыл бұрын
I think F18 Super Hornet would make more sense as they have some experience with the early model and F18 is constantly updated.
@helvetia19783 жыл бұрын
@@NATObait i agree, but i am sure that the commitee including our Bundesrat (our president for Army/Airforce) does not want to run into a second referendum....this will happen if our commitee will chose an american jet....again political resistence is announced. I really do not understand why we did not let SAAB the chance to come up with its best option during the evulation phase....we showed SAAB probably not enough will and trust to prove the can deliver the jet we need.
@JohnSmith-qq8ok3 жыл бұрын
Superb!
@planesstevee3 жыл бұрын
Amazing!!
@ГалинаЮрусова3 жыл бұрын
Супер !!!! Такого ещё никто не делал !
@ГалинаЮрусова3 жыл бұрын
У мужа ученик сейчас летает в " СТРИЖАХ " . Ему отправили это видео с вопросом : у вас в программе есть что-нибудь похожее ? Он ответил : Нет . Показал командиру . Тот сказал - будем налётывать . РАФАЛЬ , в реальном воздушном бою , они воспринимают как ОЧЕНЬ серьёзного противника !
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
@варфоломей ночь Если серьезно, то русские были очень впечатлены Rafale, когда Normandie Niemen посетила Россию в 2012 году.
@RJ-fv1bp3 жыл бұрын
Balls of steel
@bebeguygoz68403 жыл бұрын
Le meilleur...!!
@andyinkwemagangan89552 жыл бұрын
its the standard last part of the French demo
@jamesmani59853 жыл бұрын
Super Elagance ❣️Indian
@Ivancorresempre703 жыл бұрын
UFO from 01:56 🌌
@kurtbey37993 жыл бұрын
The Greek A.F. ( Hellenic A.F) will get them soon and we'll see them, as a faithful neighbour we are😇 Komşuda pişer bize de düşer 🙂
@srfrg97073 жыл бұрын
Indeed. No doupt your perseverance will give you that privilege.
@kurtbey37993 жыл бұрын
@@srfrg9707 Please make footages lots of it.
@kurtbey37993 жыл бұрын
@@srfrg9707 As I said lots of memories should be preserved since the fusilages gets old and dirt very shortly, for instance The Turkish AF f-16s and cougars hardly gets over the gravity :)
@srfrg97073 жыл бұрын
@@kurtbey3799 Geçenlerde Türk televizyonunda F16'nın görüntülerini gördüm. Not shure it was not a fake thow.
@vtecharrys.69813 жыл бұрын
@@kurtbey3799 That can be said for 2/3 of the Turkish F16's that are approaching 40 years, the end of their service life. Many of those will be forced to retire because Turkey cannot make structural upgrades to them due to US sanctions, and cannot get any parts for them either (or make them because the US has suspended the licensing).
@cesarsuarez34443 жыл бұрын
at 1:58 there is a white object behind looks like a ufo
@dougholstein3 жыл бұрын
Even ET was impressed..... UFO at beginning of footage????
@AlexKall3 жыл бұрын
Nice!
@mdc7343 жыл бұрын
Très Jolie le Rafale.
@williamf.76553 жыл бұрын
Actually, in franch, you change the adjectif, depending the gender of object. Consequently, for "une rafale" (a burst, a strong moment of wind) as this is female, you could write: "Tres joliE la rafale" But the Rafale, is a plane. And a plane is "un avion" this is male. It isn't "une avion" which had shown thst it was femal. Consequentely, you should write: "très joli le Rafale"
@Boutdumonde13 жыл бұрын
@@williamf.7655 Toi t'es pas le mec un peu chiant à corriger alors que ton Anglais n'est pas non plus parfait ? Et par ailleurs, si ça se trouve l'auteur du commentaire est lui-même Français.
@saijasaija42113 жыл бұрын
Élégant !
@Fabio-om4kb3 жыл бұрын
Trop drôle tout les coms anglais, "mouais pas terrible j'ai déjà vu mieux" 🤣
@gibsonnevincent99533 жыл бұрын
1'59 ovni in the sky ?
@garysteinert80403 жыл бұрын
Left base.... hold on... right base... forget it... runway clear.
@bman30203 жыл бұрын
Service engine light went from steady on to blinking. Had to land quick or eject. He chose land. Lucky guy.
@williamf.76553 жыл бұрын
Don't understand your idea? This is a controlled and planned landing