The Big Picture: Supreme Court : The Judges' Debate

[@anupamsharma1]

J sai deepak is simply the best in business.

[@neerajupadhyay1477]

Young Talented like j sai deepak need more on big picture shows

[@divyadas8373]

I was deeply engrossed in the debate until Mr Singh said there is no need of transparency in judicial appointment. His views are as opaque as the judiciary. J sai Deepak and Satya Prakash were pure gems in this debate.

[@vipingoyal1804]

divya das rightly said Me too!!

[@satyaprakash-mc4yf]

Humbled by your comments. Regards

[@pravalbhatt4753]

This will go as one of the best episodes of the big picture.

[@Chandan_unforgiven]

Praval Bhatt True!!

[@MohitKJha]

Feeling Sorry For Justice Singh. Advocate Sai and Journalist Prakash you both made this episode one of the best episode of this year till now. We always raise our voices against the NJAC as we think it would be an encroachment of appointing power by the executive. But this is also not true. A consideration is must as nothing is enough perfect that it is beyond the improvement. Advocate Sai thank you for mentioning 'Not taking decision is also a best decision'. And I before I wrap up my views I would like to appreciate Frank as your smile during the episode killed me.😆

[@premchandpaswan4524]

Mohit Jha Well Said Brother

[@premchandpaswan4524]

Mohit Jha Well Said Brother

[@MohitKJha]

Prashant kumar Whatever you are mentioning no one can deny these facts And it is also true and we all are well versed with all these. Here, we are not discussing the best way of appointment of the judges. HERE THE MATTER IS TO COUNTER THE DEADLOCK WHICH IS CURRENTLY STALLING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE JUDGES. we must not fix ourselves only to the collegium system. As we can see this system nowadays became the most controversial and resulting in no appointment of the new judges like Indu Malhotra and the CJ of Uttarakhand. We must consider another ways to ensure the appointment on a regular basis to smoothen the function of the supreme court. If not NJAC then a modified version of that would be an option.Thank You

[@mokshsharma09]

Mr. Deepak and Mr. Prakash nailed it😀

[@prashantsinghparihar165]

Young advocate like Deepak overriding the old judge 😀😀😀

[@smruthik1]

Sai Deepak. Amazing u r man #respect

[@lavkushyadav9463]

I agree with Mr satya prakash and Deepak sir that there should be NJAC for appointment of Judges. It will not reduce the independence of the judiciary but it will bring transparency to the judiciary system.

[@nikhilkayathwal7270]

Satya prakash has made a big fan today.... Superb debate

[@amritkhanna6463]

sai deepak is miles ahead of everyone in articulation

[@snr5950]

Thanq M/s Sai Deepak n Satya Prakash for enlightening we the ordinary mortals abt the judicial appointments by the so-called collegium system n breaking the glass ceiing of the dubious superiority of judiciary over executive'''''

[@ajaxaj8470]

Its heartening to see Satya dominating Sai,

[@santosh_979]

Ex Judges cry is like Islam खतरे में है।

[@vedaschannel1827]

Very informative debate...Mr Sai Deepak had put points very well... Now I clearly understood the basic probelm... Mr Satya Prakash also rightly said today most of the people are using superlative saying to creat fear and take advantage

[@chaitanyavelamala7268]

Came here for JSD but stayed for SP

[@kiranransing]

23:40 "... transparency is not the necessary part of the appointments of the judges". Somebody please kill me.

[@divyadas8373]

Kiran Ransing true that!!😂😂 They say Bollywood promotes nepotism and favouritism. But then you have Indian Judiciary giving tough competition. Severe allegations of the kith and kin of judges and other influential people in the judiciary benefiting from this system.

[@007kshitijjain]

Actually he is saying that Independence of judiciary is more important then transparency.

[@deepakkumar-bu7cs]

and they are also against the interference of the executives who comes from a political party with their own personal interests.....transparency should be in the appointment but executive interference is unacceptable. ..emergency is one of the example as Judge rightly pointed out

[@koushikworldian9239]

deepak kumar u can give emergency as an example but there r thousands of examples of inefficiency n corruption in judiciary sys..point is there should be checks and balances better executive n legislature n judiciary

[@koushikworldian9239]

Kshitij Jain thats a nonsense statement

[@magnetkhuraijam7698]

i understood this issue perfectly clearly from this discussion. thank you RSTV

[@dhirajbankar1094]

j sai deepak as usual,excellently articulated his views.Its very educative to hear Mr.Sai deepak on such issues. tnx rs tv

[@Nagesh10440]

Excellent Debate Again

[@jayuyuvraj3889]

Judge vs advocate and editor..... Great great great and simply great

[@TarunKumar-qr3fb]

sir, please upload subtitles which are useful for deaf people

[@sanobarkhan5861]

Right!

[@rahulnamaste]

absolutely

[@lavkushyadav9463]

tharun kumar ji you are right

[@koushikworldian9239]

tharun kumar 😲😲😲😲😲

[@richakulshreshtha8535]

Can we have J Sai Deepak more on the table? ^_^

[@nitishbisht3614]

Satyaprakash is the gem of the show, and the whole argument summed by him with facts and ideologies is really the way one should come for debate. Satyprakash, i would like to see you more on this debates.

[@ro_chy]

Transparency not necessary for judges...what is Mr MP Singh saying???

[@koushikworldian9239]

Rohit Chakraborty nothing but nonsense

[@ro_chy]

surely..what a man this MP Singh is!!

[@anjaneyarajum.s.4875]

Best debate.. may be younger among them but have more insight@sai deepak

[@Neha-kl8yz]

J sai deepak n his perfect articulation is must for a debate that is worth listening.... N Frank superb always....

[@dbsshyara3881]

Way forward...Revised and modified NJAC and judicial accountability bill

[@deepakrajsahu8084]

The best of all is Add time bound hearing and closing of cases...all will fall within line....in court transparency will never show unless young bloods mixed in 80:20 ratio with old system...thanks to the courage of Sai

[@arvindkumarsrivastava7893]

There can virtually be no Legal debates without satya prakash and sai Deepak....these men hv the potential to outflank anyone in debates

[@aijazladi1799]

Good discussion about judges

[@sanikakadam343]

Awesome debate ...one of the best

[@krishna_o15]

Seriously the guy Justice Jaspal Singh is a frustrated person as most of the judiciary is that they cannot take criticism.

[@Vamsibl]

Conduct an exam like UPSC to judges who want to go for HC and SC and in interview they should be interviewed by Judges of either SC or HC then transparency will increase and everyone will get opportunity

[@jaihind116]

Great

[@siddharthavhad6316]

Justice Singh's behaviour is the same as those Maharajas who lost their privy purse - sour and angry for losing something which was never supposed to be theirs. I wish the present government acts with an iron hand and tame the judiciary. You cannot allow the opaque system to run the system.

[@santosh_979]

These people will cry for transparency, same transparency is not needed in collegium.

[@wheeloflife17]

Brilliant discussion

[@SACHinsight]

Not taking decision is also a decision

[@sachinagrawal3767]

sai deepak what an excellent man

[@RAJGAURAV110]

when even there is finger raising towards each others in the judiciary itself. Then its time to introduce some reforms in the Judiciary itself, nd it can't be stalled just by saying that ... "it will endanger the independence of judiciary "

[@muthyamdinesh9949]

Every time, I hear about Indian Judicial system , it gives a vomiting sensation. When will this Media -bubble failed Judicial system end and begin providing justice to the common people for which they exist????People have lost faith in both the elites and the Judges who can't judge . It's like circus show.

[@balamurali746]

Govt is the biggest litigant in the court. then how can they will be allowed to have a say in appointment of judges. if allow it will create conflict of interest between executive and judiciary

[@satishkanakappanavar8531]

J sai Deepak rocks

[@BharatSingh-hw4hl]

why nowadays constant glitches while broadcasting it seems like a controversy.

[@deeprahul]

great discussion. I think there should be more time given to the programme. I could see Mr. Singh wasn't able to completely say about his opinion and had to be cut short because of the dearth of time. To have a proper good discussion there should be like 45 mins be given to each programmes.

[@awanishkumartiwari8891]

Deep Rahul I agree with your valuable suggestion .And of course this is the one of the finest debate I ever watch at Big Picture .

[@donbuddha8341]

they could have also discussed "master of the roster" issue

[@deepanshudwivedi9337]

judiciary works in cilos...that the only problem that they work in cilos..for collegium system , no of selection committee members should be increased to large number than its having today for better transparency.

[@divyadas8373]

Deepanshu dwivedi *silos

[@deepanshudwivedi9337]

yaa actuaally u r ryt...and thanks

[@takeasport9057]

Judges supporting this to allow their sons and daughters to become, judges < something which is already happening in collegium sadly.

[@bhavani805]

in most cases govt is the party ,then how can govt say in the appointment.e.g latest one judge who quashes president rule not appointing to supreme court.so say of govt in appointment not good.

[@devendrapailwan]

How can anybody dislike this?

[@chaitanyavelamala7268]

It was the collegium after listening to JSD & SP

[@suryaunknown]

Judiciary like our Constitution believed to be a sacred thing but amendment's and reforms will be the need of time to better sustain and progress of nation but it just keeps in mind that the Independence of judiciary is more or less like the Independence of Indian nation so it must be needed to keep it in views...

[@durveshnavande3708]

Sai has a sound judgment.

[@gauravkumar-rx5gd]

App ka mann mai kon sa app log bola ra hu

[@bhavani805]

if leaders maintain that high standards ,then only ask to do.

[@deepakkumar-bu7cs]

judges are known for their judgements. ..not by their appointments

[@bhavani805]

first political reforms then judiciary reforms better

[@maya7814]

10:16 thats the best way to rip apart 😂

[@bhavani805]

how we can trust prime minister&govt,if he is the obey the constitution how he can approve ordinary bill as a money bill.whatever the reason may, every organ of the constitution constitutional principles must obey at any cost .

[@bhavani805]

mr.satya prakkash your taking some mischief in the judicial system and talking about and blaming but why can't take mischief in executive. so much MPs in govt threatening to constitution,social harmony , corrupt and taking hasty decisions.so present circumstances say in judiciary better for the people of india because these rules are finally for betterment of people .

[@vimaldiyora766]

hindi me bhi debate kijiye...hume bhi kuch samaj aye